CN107066425A - Overdetermination amount flood nonuniformity analysis method under a kind of changing environment - Google Patents
Overdetermination amount flood nonuniformity analysis method under a kind of changing environment Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN107066425A CN107066425A CN201710159692.8A CN201710159692A CN107066425A CN 107066425 A CN107066425 A CN 107066425A CN 201710159692 A CN201710159692 A CN 201710159692A CN 107066425 A CN107066425 A CN 107066425A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- flood
- quantitative
- sequence
- over
- time
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 89
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 101
- 238000006424 Flood reaction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 59
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 18
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 claims description 60
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 abstract description 32
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 abstract description 26
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 abstract description 13
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 38
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 21
- 239000013256 coordination polymer Substances 0.000 description 8
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000007476 Maximum Likelihood Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 description 6
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000011218 segmentation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000354 decomposition reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004445 quantitative analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001308 synthesis method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000009853 xinfeng Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000003646 Spearman's rank correlation coefficient Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001174 ascending effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005206 flow analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011430 maximum method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035772 mutation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/10—Complex mathematical operations
- G06F17/18—Complex mathematical operations for evaluating statistical data, e.g. average values, frequency distributions, probability functions, regression analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A10/00—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE at coastal zones; at river basins
- Y02A10/40—Controlling or monitoring, e.g. of flood or hurricane; Forecasting, e.g. risk assessment or mapping
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- Computational Mathematics (AREA)
- Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
- Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
- Algebra (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Computational Biology (AREA)
- Evolutionary Biology (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Probability & Statistics with Applications (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Complex Calculations (AREA)
Abstract
本发明公开一种变化环境下超定量洪水非一致性分析方法,包括以下步骤:样本选取:采用超定量抽样方法对样本序列进行筛选;序列非一致性诊断:判断序列是否存在特大洪水的跳跃变异和趋势变异,对跳跃和趋势两种不同情况利用不同的方法进行超定量的洪水频率分析;变化环境下超定量频率计算:考虑历史洪水的超定量洪水频率分析,根据所选的连续的POT样本与历史洪水组合构成不连续POT样本,对各样本段序列进行洪水频率分析;基于POT序列进行频率分析,并考虑序列非一致性,从洪水量级和洪水发生过程两方面反应洪水随时间的变化特征,提出研究非一致性洪水的新方法,促进变化环境下的水文演变规律的研究,为水利工程建设提供有力参考。
The invention discloses a method for analyzing the inconsistency of over-quantitative floods in a changing environment, which comprises the following steps: sample selection: adopting an over-quantitative sampling method to screen sample sequences; sequence inconsistency diagnosis: judging whether the sequence has a jump variation of a catastrophic flood and trend variation, using different methods for over-quantitative flood frequency analysis for two different situations of jump and trend; over-quantitative frequency calculation under changing environment: over-quantitative flood frequency analysis considering historical floods, according to the selected continuous POT samples Combine with historical floods to form discontinuous POT samples, and analyze the flood frequency of each sample segment sequence; conduct frequency analysis based on the POT sequence, and consider the sequence inconsistency, and reflect the change of flood over time from the aspects of flood magnitude and flood occurrence process It proposes a new method for studying non-uniform floods, promotes the study of hydrological evolution laws in changing environments, and provides a powerful reference for water conservancy project construction.
Description
技术领域technical field
本发明涉及洪水频率分析技术领域,更具体地,涉及一种变化环境下超定量洪水非一致性分析方法。The invention relates to the technical field of flood frequency analysis, and more specifically, relates to a non-consistency analysis method for over-quantitative floods under changing environments.
背景技术Background technique
在气候变化和人类活动影响下,众多江河水文情势已发生了显著变化,洪旱的水文极值事件频发,并且世界上众多江河洪水序列形成的环境背景“一致性”已不复存在,传统极值流量分析的“极值理论”须要修正以适应序列非平稳性。采用现有的工程水文分析方法设计的流域开发利用工程、防洪和抗旱工程及其运行调度等,将面临由变化环境带来的设计频率失真的风险。Under the influence of climate change and human activities, the hydrological regimes of many rivers have undergone significant changes, and extreme hydrological events of floods and droughts have occurred frequently, and the "consistency" of the environmental background formed by the flood sequences of many rivers in the world no longer exists. The traditional The "extreme value theory" of extreme value flow analysis needs to be modified to accommodate sequence non-stationarity. Watershed development and utilization projects, flood control and drought relief projects and their operation scheduling designed by existing engineering hydrological analysis methods will face the risk of design frequency distortion caused by changing environments.
洪水频率分析方法采用概布拟合观测极值,从而获得指定或平均重现期的设计洪水,为水利工程规划和运行提供统依据,并且其应用已有近百年历史。通过洪水频率分析估计工程设洪存在的最大问题是观测资料过短,可供使用的洪水信息不足。传统获取洪水信息的方法为年最大值(Annual Maximun Series,AMS),但采用AMS取样,会忽略变化环境后的年内第二、第三大洪峰,尽管它们普遍比变化环境之前洪水量级要大得多。超定量(Peak-over-Threshold,POT)模型同时考虑了超定量年发生次数分布模型和超定量分布模型,比AMS法能更完整、更灵活地描述洪水及其产生过程。因此,POT模型可作为一种适合变化环境的频率分析方法。POT抽样选取实测资料中超过门限值的所有洪峰为样本,能获取比传统的年最大值(AMS)序列更多的洪水信息量,有效提高设计洪水计算精度。统计试验表明,加入计算的历史洪水重现期越长,对提高频率分析精度及稳定性越有益。考虑历史洪水的POT洪水频率分析,能从实测和考证资料两方面使洪水信息量利用最大化,提高设计洪水精度,具有较大研究价值。目前已有部分关于在POT方法中考虑历史洪水的研究,但只考虑在连续样本中加入一个考证期历史洪水,未考虑存在分组历史洪水的情况;所用数据多通过统计试验获取而非特定站点的实测及考证资料。针对特定流域分析历史洪水对POT洪水频率分析影响的研究较少。在实际应用中,考证到的历史洪水可能存在多个考证期,需考虑分组历史洪水的处理。因此,研究分组历史洪水对POT方法的影响,对提高POT洪水频率分析的适用性有重要意义。非一致性(非平稳性)水文序列的频率计算是一项新兴的研究课题,相关研究成果相当少。国内较常用的方法是基于还原/还现途径,主要包括:变异点前后系列与某一参数的关系分析法、时间系列的分解与合成法以及水文模型3种。但上述方法均存在不足,如时间系列的分解与合成法在预测期较长情况下,现有的确定性成分预测方法很难令人信服且存在较大的外延风险;通过建立水文模型从成因途径分离水文序列的确定性成分,模型很多参数的率定均局限于历史某一时期的流域物理条件。随着全球变化对水文过程影响问题研究的深入,变化环境导致非平稳性条件下的水文频率研究近年来受到格外关注。针对水文序列非平稳性,可建立基于时变统计参数非平稳序列进行估计。目前国外非平稳性洪水频率分析常用方法主要有:时间变化矩(TVM),区域汇集洪水频率分析,局部似然法,分位数回归和混合分布模型等。由于非平稳性洪水序列的统计参数(如平均值和标准差)和分布线型自身时刻发生改变,相应设计流量的不确定性也将发生变化。对此,Strupczewski等提出处理非平稳性极值序列的TVM模型,该模型考虑统计参数均值和方差的趋势性,可得到设计值随时间的变化关系。Strupczewski等以泊松-指数分布为例提出基于POT序列的TVM频率分析模型,考虑POT年发生次数序列一阶矩和POT序列一、二阶矩的趋势性,用序列的矩描述模型分布参数,并根据POT模型与AMS模型的对应关系,分别用年发生次数和POT洪峰序列的一、二阶时变矩描述AMS模型分布参数,从而得到设计值随时间的变化关系。基于POT序列的非一致频率分析模型不仅能洪峰流量随时间变化趋势,还能反映洪水发生次数的变化趋势,可较好地从量级和过程两方面,反应洪水随时间的变化特征。Strupczewski等提出的基于POT序列的TVM模型,采用的是固定门限值,Kysely等在用时变矩分析气温非一致性时提出基于分位数回归技术实现门限值时变,采用该方法获得的POT序列年发生次数满足一致性假设。此后,TVM方法被学者成功应用于其他地区,也得到一定标准P下,洪水设计值XP随时间存在显著变化关系。The flood frequency analysis method adopts the general distribution to fit the observed extreme value, so as to obtain the design flood with a specified or average return period, which provides a unified basis for the planning and operation of water conservancy projects, and its application has a history of nearly a hundred years. The biggest problem in estimating project design flood through flood frequency analysis is that the observation data is too short and the available flood information is insufficient. The traditional method of obtaining flood information is the Annual Maximum Series (AMS), but using AMS sampling will ignore the second and third largest flood peaks in the year after the environment is changed, although they are generally larger than the flood magnitude before the environment change much. The over-quantity (Peak-over-Threshold, POT) model considers both the over-quantity annual occurrence frequency distribution model and the over-quantity distribution model, which can describe the flood and its generation process more completely and flexibly than the AMS method. Therefore, the POT model can be used as a frequency analysis method suitable for changing environments. POT sampling selects all flood peaks that exceed the threshold in the measured data as samples, which can obtain more flood information than the traditional annual maximum (AMS) sequence, and effectively improve the calculation accuracy of design floods. Statistical experiments show that the longer the historical flood return period added to the calculation, the more beneficial it is to improve the accuracy and stability of frequency analysis. Considering the POT flood frequency analysis of historical floods, it can maximize the utilization of flood information from the two aspects of actual measurement and research data, improve the accuracy of design floods, and has great research value. At present, there have been some studies on considering historical floods in the POT method, but they only consider adding historical floods in a research period to continuous samples, and do not consider the existence of grouped historical floods; the data used are mostly obtained through statistical experiments rather than specific sites. Experimental and research data. Few studies have analyzed the impact of historical floods on POT flood frequency analysis for specific watersheds. In practical applications, the verified historical floods may have multiple research periods, and the processing of grouped historical floods needs to be considered. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the influence of grouping historical floods on the POT method to improve the applicability of POT flood frequency analysis. The frequency calculation of non-consistent (non-stationary) hydrological series is an emerging research topic, and the relevant research results are quite few. The more commonly used methods in China are based on the reduction/rediscovery approach, which mainly includes: the relationship analysis method between the series before and after the variation point and a certain parameter, the decomposition and synthesis method of the time series, and the hydrological model. However, the above-mentioned methods have shortcomings. For example, when the time series decomposition and synthesis method has a long prediction period, the existing deterministic component prediction method is difficult to be convincing and has a large extension risk; By separating the deterministic components of the hydrological sequence, the calibration of many parameters of the model is limited to the physical conditions of the watershed in a certain period of history. With the in-depth research on the influence of global changes on hydrological processes, the study of hydrological frequency under non-stationary conditions caused by changing environments has received special attention in recent years. Aiming at the non-stationary of hydrological series, non-stationary series based on time-varying statistical parameters can be established for estimation. At present, the commonly used methods of non-stationary flood frequency analysis in foreign countries mainly include: Time Variation Moment (TVM), regional pooled flood frequency analysis, local likelihood method, quantile regression and mixed distribution model, etc. Since the statistical parameters (such as mean and standard deviation) and the distribution line shape of the non-stationary flood sequence change from time to time, the uncertainty of the corresponding design flow will also change. In this regard, Strupczewski et al. proposed a TVM model for dealing with non-stationary extreme value sequences. This model considers the trend of statistical parameter mean and variance, and can obtain the relationship between design values and time changes. Strupczewski et al. took the Poisson-exponential distribution as an example to propose a TVM frequency analysis model based on the POT sequence, considering the first-order moment of the POT annual occurrence sequence and the trend of the first and second-order moments of the POT sequence, and using the moment of the sequence to describe the model distribution parameters. And according to the corresponding relationship between POT model and AMS model, the distribution parameters of AMS model are described by the number of annual occurrences and the first and second order time-varying moments of POT flood peak sequence, so as to obtain the relationship of design values with time. The non-uniform frequency analysis model based on the POT sequence can not only reflect the change trend of flood peak discharge over time, but also reflect the change trend of flood occurrence times, and can better reflect the change characteristics of flood over time from two aspects of magnitude and process. The TVM model based on the POT sequence proposed by Strupczewski et al. uses a fixed threshold value. Kysely et al. proposed a time-varying threshold value based on quantile regression technology when analyzing temperature inconsistency with time-varying moments. The annual occurrence frequency of POT sequence satisfies the consistency assumption. Since then, the TVM method has been successfully applied to other regions by scholars, and it has also been obtained that under a certain standard P, the flood design value XP has a significant change relationship with time.
发明内容Contents of the invention
本发明所要解决的技术问题是克服可供使用的洪水信息不足和洪水极值序列不满足一致性假设,提供一种基于POT序列利用TVM模型进行洪水频率分析,并考虑序列非一致性,从洪水量级和洪水发生过程两方面反应洪水随时间的变化特征,提出非一致性洪水频率分析的新方法。对于超定量洪峰序列中存在特大洪水跳跃点的情况,探讨历史洪水对超定量洪水频率分析结果的影响;对于超定量序列存在趋势时变的情况,将基于时变矩的非一致性洪水频率分析方法应用于超定量样本的分析,实现门限值时变的抽样方法在洪水频率分析中的应用。The technical problem to be solved by the present invention is to overcome the lack of available flood information and the inconsistency assumption of the flood extreme value sequence, provide a kind of flood frequency analysis based on the POT sequence using the TVM model, and consider the sequence inconsistency, from the flood The magnitude and process of floods reflect the characteristics of flood changes over time, and a new method for analyzing the frequency of non-uniform floods is proposed. For the case where there are extreme flood jump points in the over-quantitative flood peak sequence, the influence of historical floods on the frequency analysis results of over-quantitative floods is discussed; for the case where there is a time-varying trend in the over-quantitative flood sequence, the non-uniform flood frequency analysis based on time-varying moments The method is applied to the analysis of ultra-quantitative samples, and realizes the application of the sampling method with time-varying threshold value in the analysis of flood frequency.
为解决上述技术问题,本发明的技术方案如下:一种变化环境下超定量洪水非一致性分析方法,包括以下步骤:In order to solve the above-mentioned technical problems, the technical solution of the present invention is as follows: a non-consistency analysis method for over-quantitative floods under a changing environment, comprising the following steps:
样本选取:考虑历史洪水进行洪水频率分析,确定门限值,采用超定量抽样方法对样本序列进行筛选;Sample selection: consider historical floods for flood frequency analysis, determine threshold values, and use super-quantitative sampling methods to screen sample sequences;
序列非一致性诊断:判断序列是否存在特大洪水的跳跃变异和趋势变异,对跳跃和趋势两种不同情况利用不同的方法进行超定量的洪水频率分析;Sequence inconsistency diagnosis: judging whether there is jump variation and trend variation of catastrophic floods in the sequence, using different methods for super-quantitative flood frequency analysis for the two different situations of jump and trend;
变化环境下超定量频率计算:考虑历史洪水的超定量洪水频率分析,根据所选的连续的POT样本,与历史洪水组合构成不连续POT样本,对各样本段序列进行洪水频率分析;采用极大似然法估计GP分布参数,得到各序列拟合优度及重现期设计洪水计算结果。非一致性超定量洪水频率分析,采用TVM模型对非一致性年最大日流量序列进行分析,通过Mann-Kendall(M-K)法和CSDMC方法诊断序列的趋势变化及阶段变化特征可作为依据来选择TVM方法的时间基点,最终推导出相应的AMS模型的分布,拟合AMS序列并进行非一致性洪水频率分析。拟合AMS序列并进行非一致性洪水频率分析。Calculation of over-quantitative frequency under changing environment: considering the over-quantitative flood frequency analysis of historical floods, according to the selected continuous POT samples, combined with historical floods to form discontinuous POT samples, the flood frequency analysis is performed on each sample segment sequence; The likelihood method is used to estimate the GP distribution parameters, and the goodness of fit of each sequence and the calculation results of the design flood in the return period are obtained. Non-consistent super-quantitative flood frequency analysis, using the TVM model to analyze the non-consistent annual maximum daily flow series, and using the Mann-Kendall (M-K) method and CSDMC method to diagnose the trend and stage change characteristics of the series can be used as a basis to select TVM The time base point of the method, and finally deduce the distribution of the corresponding AMS model, fit the AMS sequence and conduct the non-consistent flood frequency analysis. Fitting AMS series and performing non-uniform flood frequency analysis.
在一种优选的方案中,所述门限值根据独立性准则和超定量门限值选取标准确定。门限值根据超定量系列发生次数分布、超定量洪水频率分布以及独立同分布假设共同确定,利用超定量样本均值法、分散指数法、年均超定量发生次数μ法确定门限值的取值范围。In a preferred solution, the threshold value is determined according to an independence criterion and an over-quantity threshold value selection criterion. The threshold value is jointly determined based on the occurrence frequency distribution of the over-quantity series, the frequency distribution of over-quantity floods and the assumption of independent and identical distribution, and the value of the threshold value is determined by using the over-quantity sample mean method, the dispersion index method, and the annual average number of over-quantity occurrence times μ method scope.
在一种优选的方案中,所述序列非一致性诊断是利用M-K趋势检验法分析,判断洪水序列的趋势性和跳跃。In a preferred solution, the sequence inconsistency diagnosis is analyzed by using the M-K trend test method to determine the trend and jump of the flood sequence.
在一种优选的方案中,对不同的洪水序列采用不同的洪水频率分析方法。时变门限值的频率分析方法是指:考虑门限值的时间变化特征,采用时变的门限值提取超定量样本,获得满足一致性假设的POT年发生次数序列。在采用时变门限值获取POT样本后,考虑POT序列一、二阶矩的趋势性,采用Poisson-GP分布,用时变矩描述模型分布参数,进行门限值和POT样本矩时变的超定量洪水频率分析。In a preferred solution, different flood frequency analysis methods are used for different flood sequences. The frequency analysis method of the time-varying threshold value refers to: considering the time-varying characteristics of the threshold value, using the time-varying threshold value to extract super-quantitative samples, and obtaining the annual occurrence frequency sequence of POT that satisfies the consistency assumption. After using the time-varying threshold to obtain POT samples, considering the trend of the first and second order moments of the POT sequence, using the Poisson-GP distribution, using the time-varying moment to describe the model distribution parameters, the threshold value and the time-varying moment of the POT sample are time-varying. Quantitative Flood Frequency Analysis.
在一种优选的方案中,所述的洪水频率分析方法包括固定门限值时变矩方法和时变门限值时变矩方法。In a preferred solution, the flood frequency analysis method includes a time-varying moment method with a fixed threshold value and a time-varying moment method with a time-varying threshold value.
在一种优选的方案中,所述固定门限值时变矩方法为确定唯一固定的门限值,在洪水频率分析中选择不同的概率分布,考虑序列前两阶矩不同趋势构造不同TVM模型的非一致性处理方法。TVM模型考虑了洪水时间序列第一、第二阶矩(均值m和标准差σ)的趋势成分,把分布的原始参数用时变矩来表示,对概率密度函数的参数进行估计。把极大似然法应用在满足独立性要求的洪水序列上,假设造成序列不满足独立性仅是因为序列存在趋势,将这种趋势考虑在模型中。最终用AIC准则作为最优模型的判别标准。In a preferred solution, the time-varying moment method for the fixed threshold value is to determine a unique fixed threshold value, select different probability distributions in the flood frequency analysis, and construct different TVM models considering the different trends of the first two moments of the sequence inconsistency handling method. The TVM model considers the trend components of the first and second moments (mean m and standard deviation σ) of the flood time series, expresses the original parameters of the distribution as time-varying moments, and estimates the parameters of the probability density function. Applying the maximum likelihood method to the flood sequence that meets the independence requirement, assuming that the sequence does not meet the independence requirement is only due to the sequence's trend, and this trend is taken into account in the model. Finally, the AIC criterion is used as the criterion of the optimal model.
在一种优选的方案中,所述时变门限值时变矩方法为将气温的非一致性研究时变门限值应用到洪水超定量样本的提取中,采用回归分位数计算时变门限值,并根据流域水库调蓄情况确定分段门限值,在抽样时考虑洪水发生次数的非一致性。In a preferred scheme, the time-varying threshold time-varying moment method is to apply the time-varying threshold value of the inconsistency research of temperature to the extraction of flood over-quantitative samples, and use the regression quantile to calculate the time-varying Threshold value, and determine the sub-threshold value according to the regulation and storage of reservoirs in the river basin, and consider the inconsistency of the number of flood occurrences when sampling.
与现有技术相比,本发明技术方案的有益效果是:Compared with the prior art, the beneficial effects of the technical solution of the present invention are:
(1)将历史洪水应用于超定量频率分析,分析实测资料中存在特大洪水时分组历史洪水对POT洪水频率分析结果的影响。(1) Apply historical floods to super-quantitative frequency analysis, and analyze the influence of grouped historical floods on POT flood frequency analysis results when there are severe floods in the measured data.
(2)将基于时变矩的非一致洪水频率分析应用超定量方法中,与年最大值法相比,非一致性超定量洪水频率分析能同时反映发生洪水发生过程及洪水量级的变化特征。(2) Applying the non-uniform flood frequency analysis based on time-varying moments to the super-quantitative method, compared with the annual maximum method, the non-uniform super-quantitative flood frequency analysis can reflect the change characteristics of the flood occurrence process and flood magnitude at the same time.
(3)非一致性超定量洪水频率分析多采用固定门限值提取样本,本文将用气温的非一致性研究时变门限值应用到洪水超定量样本的提取中,采用回归分位数计算时变门限值,并根据流域水库调蓄情况确定分段门限值,在抽样时考虑洪水发生次数的非一致性。(3) The frequency analysis of non-uniform and over-quantitative floods usually uses a fixed threshold value to extract samples. In this paper, the time-varying threshold value of the non-uniform study of temperature is applied to the extraction of over-quantitative flood samples, and the regression quantile is used to calculate The time-varying threshold value is determined according to the regulation and storage of reservoirs in the basin, and the non-uniformity of flood occurrence times is taken into account when sampling.
附图说明Description of drawings
图1为本发明模型框架图。Fig. 1 is a frame diagram of the model of the present invention.
图2为本发明实施例1的POT样本选取示意图。FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of POT sample selection in Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
图3为本发明实施例1的序列非一致性诊断示意图。Fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of sequence inconsistency diagnosis in Example 1 of the present invention.
图4为本发明实施例1的系统框图。FIG. 4 is a system block diagram of Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
图5为本发明实施例2的东江三站时变门限值及洪峰流量。Fig. 5 is the time-varying threshold value and flood peak flow of the three Dongjiang stations in Embodiment 2 of the present invention.
图6为本发明实施例2的东江三站分段门限值及洪峰流量。Fig. 6 shows the subsection thresholds and flood peak flows of the three Dongjiang stations in Embodiment 2 of the present invention.
图7为本发明实施例2的东江三站基于时间基准点的POT洪水频率曲线变化情况。Fig. 7 is the change of the POT flood frequency curve based on the time reference point of the three Dongjiang stations according to the second embodiment of the present invention.
具体实施方式detailed description
附图仅用于示例性说明,不能理解为对本专利的限制;The accompanying drawings are for illustrative purposes only and cannot be construed as limiting the patent;
为了更好说明本实施例,附图某些部件会有省略、放大或缩小,并不代表实际产品的尺寸;In order to better illustrate this embodiment, some parts in the drawings will be omitted, enlarged or reduced, and do not represent the size of the actual product;
对于本领域技术人员来说,附图中某些公知结构及其说明可能省略是可以理解的。For those skilled in the art, it is understandable that some well-known structures and descriptions thereof may be omitted in the drawings.
下面结合附图和实施例对本发明的技术方案做进一步的说明。The technical solutions of the present invention will be further described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and embodiments.
实施例1Example 1
如图1所示,一种变化环境下超定量洪水非一致性分析方法,包括以下步骤:As shown in Figure 1, a non-consistency analysis method for over-quantitative floods in a changing environment includes the following steps:
样本选取:考虑历史洪水进行洪水频率分析,确定门限值,采用超定量抽样方法对样本序列进行筛选;Sample selection: consider historical floods for flood frequency analysis, determine threshold values, and use super-quantitative sampling methods to screen sample sequences;
序列非一致性诊断:判断序列是否存在特大洪水的跳跃变异和趋势变异,对跳跃和趋势两种不同情况利用不同的方法进行超定量的洪水频率分析;Sequence inconsistency diagnosis: judging whether there is jump variation and trend variation of catastrophic floods in the sequence, using different methods for super-quantitative flood frequency analysis for the two different situations of jump and trend;
变化环境下超定量频率计算:考虑历史洪水的超定量洪水频率分析,根据所选的连续的POT样本,与历史洪水组合构成不连续POT样本,对各样本段序列进行洪水频率分析;采用极大似然法估计GP分布参数,得到各序列拟合优度及重现期设计洪水计算结果。非一致性超定量洪水频率分析,采用TVM模型对非一致性年最大日流量序列进行分析,通过M-K法和CSDMC方法诊断序列的趋势变化及阶段变化特征可作为依据来选择TVM方法的时间基点,最终推导出相应的AMS模型的分布,拟合AMS序列并进行非一致性洪水频率分析。拟合AMS序列并进行非一致性洪水频率分析。Calculation of over-quantitative frequency under changing environment: considering the over-quantitative flood frequency analysis of historical floods, according to the selected continuous POT samples, combined with historical floods to form discontinuous POT samples, the flood frequency analysis is performed on each sample segment sequence; The likelihood method is used to estimate the GP distribution parameters, and the goodness of fit of each sequence and the calculation results of the design flood in the return period are obtained. Non-consistent super-quantitative flood frequency analysis, using the TVM model to analyze the non-consistent annual maximum daily flow series, and using the M-K method and CSDMC method to diagnose the trend and phase change characteristics of the series can be used as a basis to select the time base point of the TVM method. Finally, the distribution of the corresponding AMS model is deduced, the AMS sequence is fitted, and the non-uniform flood frequency analysis is performed. Fitting AMS series and performing non-uniform flood frequency analysis.
在具体实施过程中,所述门限值根据独立性准则和超定量门限值选取标准确定。门限值根据超定量系列发生次数分布、超定量洪水频率分布以及独立同分布假设共同确定,利用超定量样本均值法、分散指数法、年均超定量发生次数μ法确定门限值的取值范围。In a specific implementation process, the threshold value is determined according to the independence criterion and the selection criterion of the over-quantity threshold value. The threshold value is jointly determined based on the occurrence frequency distribution of the over-quantity series, the frequency distribution of over-quantity floods and the assumption of independent and identical distribution, and the value of the threshold value is determined by using the over-quantity sample mean method, the dispersion index method, and the annual average number of over-quantity occurrence times μ method scope.
在具体实施过程中,所述序列非一致性诊断是利用M-K趋势检验法分析,判断洪水序列的趋势性和跳跃。In the specific implementation process, the sequence inconsistency diagnosis is analyzed by using the M-K trend test method to judge the trend and jump of the flood sequence.
在具体实施过程中,对不同的洪水序列采用不同的洪水频率分析方法。时变门限值的频率分析方法是指:考虑门限值的时间变化特征,采用时变的门限值提取超定量样本,获得满足一致性假设的POT年发生次数序列。在采用时变门限值获取POT样本后,考虑POT序列一、二阶矩的趋势性,采用Poisson-GP分布,用时变矩描述模型分布参数,进行门限值和POT样本矩时变的超定量洪水频率分析。In the specific implementation process, different flood frequency analysis methods are used for different flood sequences. The frequency analysis method of the time-varying threshold value refers to: considering the time-varying characteristics of the threshold value, using the time-varying threshold value to extract super-quantitative samples, and obtaining the annual occurrence frequency sequence of POT that satisfies the consistency assumption. After using the time-varying threshold to obtain POT samples, considering the trend of the first and second order moments of the POT sequence, using the Poisson-GP distribution, using the time-varying moment to describe the model distribution parameters, the threshold value and the time-varying moment of the POT sample are time-varying. Quantitative Flood Frequency Analysis.
在具体实施过程中,所述的洪水频率分析方法包括固定门限值时变矩方法和时变门限值时变矩方法。In a specific implementation process, the flood frequency analysis method includes a time-varying moment method with a fixed threshold value and a time-varying moment method with a time-varying threshold value.
在具体实施过程中,所述固定门限值时变矩方法为确定唯一固定的门限值,在洪水频率分析中选择不同的概率分布,考虑序列前两阶矩不同趋势构造不同TVM模型的非一致性处理方法。TVM模型考虑了洪水时间序列第一、第二阶矩(均值m和标准差σ)的趋势成分,把分布的原始参数用时变矩来表示,对概率密度函数的参数进行估计。把极大似然法应用在满足独立性要求的洪水序列上,假设造成序列不满足独立性仅是因为序列存在趋势,将这种趋势考虑在模型中。最终用AIC准则作为最优模型的判别标准。In the specific implementation process, the time-varying moment method of the fixed threshold value is to determine the only fixed threshold value, select different probability distributions in the flood frequency analysis, and consider the different trends of the first two order moments of the sequence to construct different TVM models. consistent approach. The TVM model considers the trend components of the first and second moments (mean m and standard deviation σ) of the flood time series, expresses the original parameters of the distribution as time-varying moments, and estimates the parameters of the probability density function. Applying the maximum likelihood method to the flood sequence that meets the independence requirement, assuming that the sequence does not meet the independence requirement is only due to the sequence's trend, and this trend is taken into account in the model. Finally, the AIC criterion is used as the criterion of the optimal model.
在具体实施过程中,所述时变门限值时变矩方法为将气温的非一致性研究时变门限值应用到洪水超定量样本的提取中,采用回归分位数计算时变门限值,并根据流域水库调蓄情况确定分段门限值,在抽样时考虑洪水发生次数的非一致性。In the specific implementation process, the time-varying threshold time-varying moment method is to apply the time-varying threshold value of the inconsistency research of temperature to the extraction of flood over-quantitative samples, and use the regression quantile to calculate the time-varying threshold value, and determine the segmentation threshold value according to the adjustment and storage of the basin reservoir, and consider the inconsistency of the number of flood occurrences when sampling.
在具体实施过程中,考虑历史洪水的超定量洪水频率分析的工作过程如下:In the specific implementation process, the working process of over-quantitative flood frequency analysis considering historical floods is as follows:
1.超定量洪水频率分析。设POT年发生次数服从Poisson分布,年发生次数m的概率为:式中,m为年发生次数,λ为Poisson分布参数,Poisson分布的数学期望E(m)=λ。超定量洪水频率分布服从GP分布,在超定量发生次数服从泊松分布的条件下,则洪峰流量x的重现期T(x)为:式中μ为年平均超定量发生次数,F(x)为x不超过概率。1. Super-quantitative flood frequency analysis. Assuming that the annual occurrence frequency of POT obeys the Poisson distribution, the probability of the annual occurrence frequency m is: In the formula, m is the number of occurrences per year, λ is the parameter of Poisson distribution, and the mathematical expectation of Poisson distribution is E(m)=λ. The frequency distribution of over-quantity floods obeys the GP distribution, and under the condition that the number of over-quantity occurrences obeys the Poisson distribution, the return period T(x) of the flood peak flow x is: In the formula, μ is the average annual number of over-quantity occurrences, and F(x) is the probability that x does not exceed.
2.洪峰独立性及门限值选取。超定量洪水频率分析的前提是洪峰样本具有独立性。本模型采用美国水资源协会(USWRC)提出的独立洪峰判别标准。同时选取两个连续洪峰的条件为θ>5+ln(A)且Xmin<0.75min[Q1,Q2],式中,θ为两个峰间的间隔时间(天);A为流域面积,Mile2;Qi为第i场洪水的最大日流量。不满足上述条件的连续洪峰中,只取其中最大一次洪峰。门限值根据超定量系列发生次数分布、超定量洪水频率分布以及独立同分布假设共同确定。利用超定量样本均值法、分散指数法、年均超定量发生次数μ法确定门限值的取值范围。2. Flood peak independence and threshold value selection. The premise of super-quantitative flood frequency analysis is that the flood peak samples are independent. This model adopts the independent flood peak criterion proposed by the United States Water Resources Council (USWRC). The conditions for selecting two consecutive flood peaks at the same time are θ>5+ln(A) and X min <0.75min[Q1, Q2], where θ is the interval time (days) between two peaks; A is the watershed area, Mile 2 ; Qi is the maximum daily discharge of the i-th flood. Among the continuous flood peaks that do not meet the above conditions, only the largest flood peak is taken. The threshold value is jointly determined based on the occurrence frequency distribution of over-quantity series, the frequency distribution of over-quantity floods and the assumption of independent and identical distribution. The value range of the threshold value was determined by using the over-quantity sample mean method, the dispersion index method, and the annual average over-quantity occurrence times μ method.
3.参数估计。本模型采用极大似然估计,含一个考证期历史洪水条件下,设考证期为N年,在无实测资料的年份(N-S)年中有k场历史洪水,其中最小历史洪水为X0,对于考证期内未知洪水流量的数据,但已知其流量小于考证期内已知历史洪水中的最小洪水,用不超过概率表示,已知流量的历史洪水用概率密度函数表示,则对数似然函数为:3. Parameter estimation. This model adopts maximum likelihood estimation, under the condition of including a historical flood in a research period, assuming that the research period is N years, there are k historical floods in the year (N-S) without actual measurement data, and the minimum historical flood is X0, for The data of unknown flood discharge during the research period, but known that its discharge is less than the minimum flood in the known historical floods during the research period, is expressed by the probability of not exceeding, and the historical flood with known discharge is expressed by the probability density function, then the logarithmic likelihood The function is:
式中,h=μ*(N-S),为无实测资料的(N-S)年中超过门限值的洪水数量;xi为实测洪水,yj为历史洪水,其余参数意义同前。In the formula, h=μ*(N-S), which is the number of floods exceeding the threshold value in (N-S) years without actual measurement data; xi is the measured flood, yj is the historical flood, and the meanings of other parameters are the same as before.
4.拟合优度检验。采用基于准则的离(残)差平方和最小准则(OLS)和概率点据相关系数(PPCC)评价模型的拟合优度。PPCC检验统计量:4. Goodness of fit test. The criterion-based minimum sum of squares (OLS) and the probability point data correlation coefficient (PPCC) were used to evaluate the goodness of fit of the model. PPCC test statistic:
式中,x(i)和xm分别表示排序后的实测值和实测样本的均值;y(i)和ym分别是假设分布相对于x(i)的理论值和均值,理论上,y(i)=E(x(i)),ym=xm。In the formula, x (i) and x m represent the sorted measured value and the mean value of the measured sample, respectively; y (i) and y m are the theoretical value and mean value of the hypothetical distribution relative to x (i) , respectively. In theory, y (i) = E(x (i) ), y m = x m .
OLS检验: OLS test:
式中,Pi为对应于x(i)的经验频率,f(Pi,θ)为频率曲线纵坐标,其他参数意义同前。In the formula, P i is the empirical frequency corresponding to x (i) , f(P i , θ) is the ordinate of the frequency curve, and the meanings of other parameters are the same as before.
5.趋势检验。采用Spearman秩相关系数法检验样本趋势性。统计量ZSP随n的增加收敛于标准正态分布。如果数据xi按升序排序,则ZSP>0,表明序列有上升趋势;ZSP<0,表明序列有下降趋势;若按降序排序,则相反。|ZSP|≤Zα/2,则接受零假设,即趋势不显著;否则,趋势显著。α为显著性水平Z0.05/2=1.96。5. Trend test. The sample trend was tested by the Spearman rank correlation coefficient method. The statistic Z SP converges to the standard normal distribution with the increase of n. If the data xi are sorted in ascending order, then Z SP > 0, indicating that the sequence has an upward trend; Z SP < 0, indicating that the sequence has a downward trend; if sorted in descending order, the opposite is true. |Z SP |≤Z α/2 , the null hypothesis is accepted, that is, the trend is not significant; otherwise, the trend is significant. α is the significance level Z 0.05/2 = 1.96.
在具体实施过程中,基于时变矩的非一致性超定量洪水频率分析的工作过程如下:In the specific implementation process, the working process of non-uniform over-quantitative flood frequency analysis based on time-varying moments is as follows:
1.洪水序列非一致性诊断。利用Cumulative Sum of Departures ofModulusCoefficient(CSDMC)检测洪峰流量变化阶段特征,该方法可反映序列时间变化的细节信息。采用M-K趋势检验法分析洪水时间序列趋势特征。1. Flood sequence inconsistency diagnosis. The Cumulative Sum of Departures of Modulus Coefficient (CSDMC) is used to detect the stage characteristics of the flood peak flow change, which can reflect the detailed information of the sequence time change. The M-K trend test method was used to analyze the trend characteristics of the flood time series.
2.POT模型与AMS模型的转换。采用Poisson分布拟合超定量洪水年发生次数序列,用GP分布拟合超定量序列,应用Pareto-Poisson分布描述POT模型,则相应的AMS序列服从GEV分布。将POT模型与AMS模型的参数进行转换,对于xx0,AMS序列GEV分布的参数k*、α*、ξ*与POT序列Pareto-Poisson分布参数λ、α、k、的转换关系为:ξ*=ξ+αln(λ)α*=αk*=k≠02. Conversion between POT model and AMS model. The Poisson distribution is used to fit the over-quantity flood annual occurrence sequence, the GP distribution is used to fit the over-quantity sequence, and the Pareto-Poisson distribution is used to describe the POT model, then the corresponding AMS sequence obeys the GEV distribution. Convert the parameters of the POT model and the AMS model. For xx0, the parameters k*, α*, ξ* of the GEV distribution of the AMS sequence and the Pareto-Poisson distribution of the POT sequence The conversion relationship of parameters λ, α, k, is: ξ * = ξ+αln(λ) α * = αk * =k≠0
α为GP分布的尺度参数,k为形状参数;k*为AMS形状参数、α*为AMS尺度参数、ξ*为AMS位置参数。α is the scale parameter of GP distribution, k is the shape parameter; k* is the shape parameter of AMS, α* is the scale parameter of AMS, and ξ* is the location parameter of AMS.
3.时变矩方法。在洪水频率分析中考虑洪水时间序列第一、二阶矩的趋势成分对序列进行非一致性处理。3. Time-varying moment method. In the flood frequency analysis, the trend components of the first and second moments of the flood time series are considered to deal with the inconsistency of the series.
时间变化矩方法的具体实施方法为:The specific implementation method of the time-varying moment method is as follows:
3.1.时变矩模型。设分布的概率密度函数为f=f(x;p),其中,p为分布参数,与前两阶矩的关系为p=p(m,σ),则概率密度函数为f=f(x;m,σ)。其中m,σ为考虑趋势成分的样本矩,与时间有关,有m=m(t;θ(m))和σ=(t;θ(σ)),用θ(m)和θ(σ)分别表示m和σ的参数向量,则参数p为p=p(t;θ),θ为由θ(m)、θ(σ)组成的参数矩阵。通过时变矩法把分布参数向量p转换为m和σ的参数向量θ(m)、θ(σ),即f=f(x,t;θ)。3.1. Time-varying moment model. Suppose the probability density function of the distribution is f=f(x;p), where p is the distribution parameter, and the relationship with the first two moments is p=p(m,σ), then the probability density function is f=f(x ; m,σ). Among them, m and σ are the sample moments considering the trend component, related to time, there are m=m(t; θ (m) ) and σ=(t; θ (σ) ), use θ (m) and θ (σ) represent the parameter vectors of m and σ respectively, then the parameter p is p=p(t; θ), and θ is a parameter matrix composed of θ (m) and θ (σ) . Transform the distribution parameter vector p into the parameter vectors θ (m) and θ (σ) of m and σ by the time-varying moment method, that is, f=f(x,t; θ).
3.2.趋势模型。用简单的连续函数表述样本前二阶矩存在的趋势,考虑存在线性趋势和抛物线趋势的情况,共分析了六种时间-趋势种类:①均值具有线性趋势(AL);②标准差具有线性趋势(BL);③均值、标准差均有线性趋势,并以一固定值(变差系数Cv)为比例相关(CL);④均值和标准差都具有线性趋势,并且不相关(DL);⑤均值具有抛物线趋势(AP);⑥均值、标准差均有抛物线趋势,并以一固定值(变差系数Cv)为比例相关(CP)。在洪水频率分析中考虑洪水时间序列第一、二阶矩的趋势成分对序列进行非一致性处理。还有一种稳定状态情况(S),假设样本矩不存在趋势变化,即分布参数稳定。POT模型需要考虑的有两个序列,一个是用Poisson分布拟合的超定量年发生次数序列,一个是用GP分布拟合的超定量洪水序列,两个序列中任何一个序列存在趋势,都将影响AMS模型GEV分布的参数计算结果。由于Poisson分布参数λ为超定量年发生次数样本的数学期望,故超定量年发生次数序列只需考虑一阶矩的趋势;POT序列考虑前二阶矩的趋势。两序列结合考虑,可衍生出多种趋势模型,本模型共考虑15种,模型名称“ALS”表示超定量年发生次数样本均值具有线性趋势,超定量洪水序列前二阶矩均不具有趋势,“SAL”表示超定量年发生次数样本均值不具有趋势,超定量洪水序列均值具有线性趋势,其余模型同理。各趋势模型样本前二阶矩的表达式及模型增加参数个数详见表1各趋势模型两阶矩的表达式。3.2. Trend model. Using a simple continuous function to describe the trend of the first second moment of the sample, considering the existence of linear and parabolic trends, a total of six time-trend types are analyzed: ①The mean has a linear trend (AL); ②The standard deviation has a linear trend (BL); ③The mean value and standard deviation have a linear trend, and a fixed value (coefficient of variation Cv) is proportionally related (CL); ④The mean value and standard deviation have a linear trend, and are not correlated (DL); ⑤ The mean has a parabolic trend (AP); ⑥The mean and standard deviation have a parabolic trend, and a fixed value (coefficient of variation Cv) is proportionally related (CP). In the flood frequency analysis, the trend components of the first and second moments of the flood time series are considered to deal with the inconsistency of the series. There is also a steady-state situation (S), which assumes that there is no trend change in the sample moments, that is, the parameters of the distribution are stable. There are two sequences that need to be considered in the POT model, one is the overquantitative annual occurrence sequence fitted by the Poisson distribution, and the other is the overquantified flood sequence fitted by the GP distribution. If any of the two sequences has a trend, it will be Calculated results of parameters affecting the GEV distribution of the AMS model. Since the parameter λ of the Poisson distribution is the mathematical expectation of the sample of overquantitative annual occurrences, only the trend of the first-order moment is considered for the overquantitative annual occurrence sequence; the trend of the first second-order moment is considered for the POT sequence. Considering the two series together, a variety of trend models can be derived. This model considers 15 types in total. The model name "ALS" indicates that the sample mean of the over-quantitative annual occurrence times has a linear trend, and the first second-order moments of the over-quantitative flood series do not have a trend. "SAL" indicates that the sample mean of over-quantitative annual occurrences does not have a trend, and the mean of over-quantitative flood series has a linear trend, and the rest of the models are the same. For the expression of the first second-order moment of each trend model sample and the number of parameters added to the model, see Table 1 for the expression of the second-order moment of each trend model.
3.3.参数估计。利用极大似然法估计参数,参数估计结果为使对数似然函数lnL取最大值时的参数矩阵g和h,由此计算各时间基准点t时POT模型参数,再根据POT模型和AMS模型相关关系计算相应GEV分布参数。3.3. Parameter estimation. Using the maximum likelihood method to estimate the parameters, the parameter estimation results are the parameter matrices g and h when the logarithmic likelihood function lnL takes the maximum value, thus calculating the parameters of the POT model at each time reference point t, and then according to the POT model and AMS Model correlations calculate the corresponding GEV distribution parameters.
3.4.最优趋势模型选择。本模型以基于最大熵原理AIC准则为最优趋势模型的选择标准。该准则考虑两部分内容,一是模型对样本的拟合效果,用似然函数值反应;二是模型稳定性,通过对模型的参数个数进行惩罚来实现。最终选取对数据拟合较好而参数数量尽可能少的模型为最优模型。增加模型参数可提高对样本的拟合效果,但可能因为过分强调对样本的拟合效果而降低曲线外延性,由于洪水频率分析更关心曲线的外延部分,所以在模型选择上,应尽量简化参数。AIC准则可检验出不同模型间差异显著性,并综合权衡模型适用性和参数个数之间的关系,计算简单、客观。计算公式:AIC=-2lnML+2k,式中,ML为似然函数的最大值,为极大似然参数估计结果对应的似然函数值;k为模型参数个数。AIC值最小的趋势模型为最优模型。3.4. Optimal trend model selection. This model uses the AIC criterion based on the principle of maximum entropy as the selection criterion for the optimal trend model. This criterion considers two parts, one is the fitting effect of the model to the sample, which is reflected by the likelihood function value; the other is the model stability, which is realized by punishing the number of parameters of the model. Finally, the model that fits the data well and has as few parameters as possible is selected as the optimal model. Increasing the model parameters can improve the fitting effect of the sample, but the extension of the curve may be reduced due to overemphasis on the fitting effect of the sample. Since the flood frequency analysis is more concerned with the extension part of the curve, the parameters should be simplified as much as possible in the model selection . The AIC criterion can test the significance of the difference between different models, and comprehensively weigh the relationship between the applicability of the model and the number of parameters, and the calculation is simple and objective. Calculation formula: AIC=-2lnML+2k, where ML is the maximum value of the likelihood function, which is the value of the likelihood function corresponding to the maximum likelihood parameter estimation result; k is the number of model parameters. The trend model with the smallest AIC value is the optimal model.
3.5.序列重构。在用极大似然法估计POT模型GP-Poisson分布的时变矩参数后,就可取任意年份(t0)作为基准参照年份,通过超过概率将实测序列转换为稳定条件下的序列。3.5. Sequence reconstruction. After using the maximum likelihood method to estimate the time-varying moment parameters of the POT model GP-Poisson distribution, any year (t 0 ) can be taken as the reference year, and the measured sequence can be converted into a sequence under stable conditions by exceeding the probability.
表1各趋势模型两阶矩的表达式。Table 1 The expressions of the second-order moments of each trend model.
具体实施过程中,考虑时变门限值的超定量洪水频率分析的工作过程如下:In the specific implementation process, the working process of the over-quantitative flood frequency analysis considering the time-varying threshold value is as follows:
1.时变门限值估计。1. Time-varying threshold estimation.
1.1通过分位数回归方法估计时变门限值,自然直观地取变量分布的高分位数为时变门限值进行超定量分析。分位数回归估计通过 完成最小值线性规划。式中,θ为所要估计的分位数值,代表在回归线或回归表面以下的数据占全体数据的百分比,θ∈(0,1);β为随着θ变化而变化的系数向量,称β(θ)为第θ回归分位数;yi为因变量向量,xi为自变量向量。以洪峰流量对应年为自变量,洪峰流量为因变量,进行分位数回归估计以确定时变门限值。先以较大的年均超定量发生次数μ初步提取超定量洪峰作为因变量,再根据所需年均发生次数确定分位数,最后进行分位数回归估计,位于回归线上的洪峰流量为根据时变门限值获取的POT洪峰序列。1.1 The time-varying threshold value is estimated by the quantile regression method, and the high quantile of the variable distribution is naturally and intuitively taken as the time-varying threshold value for super-quantitative analysis. Quantile regression is estimated by Complete the minimum linear program. In the formula, θ is the quantile value to be estimated, representing the percentage of the data below the regression line or the regression surface in the whole data, θ∈(0,1); β is the coefficient vector that changes with θ, called β( θ) is the θth regression quantile; y i is the dependent variable vector, and xi is the independent variable vector. Taking the year corresponding to the flood peak flow as the independent variable and the peak flow as the dependent variable, quantile regression estimation is performed to determine the time-varying threshold. Firstly, the over-quantity flood peak is initially extracted as the dependent variable based on the relatively large annual average number of over-quantity occurrences μ, and then the quantile is determined according to the required annual average occurrence number, and finally the quantile regression estimation is performed. The flood peak flow on the regression line is based POT flood peak sequence obtained by time-varying threshold.
1.2根据流域环境变化特征确定分段门限值。对实测流量数据划分不同时间区间,各时间阶段内通过给定年均发生次数单独提取超定量样本,从而确定相应阶段门限值。时间阶段划分可根据各水文站控制流域的人类活动如土地利用、水利工程影响以及气候变化特征确定,由此确定的门限值能够反映流域环境变化特征。此外,也可采用固定门限值先提取POT样本,通过分析超定量年发生次数序列的阶段变化特征确定。1.2 Determine the segmentation threshold value according to the change characteristics of the watershed environment. The measured flow data is divided into different time intervals, and over-quantitative samples are extracted separately through a given annual average occurrence number in each time stage, so as to determine the threshold value of the corresponding stage. The division of time stages can be determined according to the human activities in the watershed controlled by each hydrological station, such as land use, impact of water conservancy projects, and climate change characteristics. The threshold value thus determined can reflect the characteristics of the watershed environment change. In addition, a fixed threshold value can also be used to extract POT samples first, and then determine by analyzing the phase change characteristics of the over-quantitative annual occurrence sequence.
2.门限值时变的超定量洪水频率分布。设X*=(x1*,…,xi*,…,xn*)表示采用时变门限值提取的超定量洪峰流量序列,n为序列长度;X=(x1,…,xi,…,xn)表示洪峰流量超过门限值的部分;S=(s1,…,sj,…,sN)为各年门限值,N为年数;则xi=xi*-sj,j为xi所在年。记POT序列为X,用于时变矩分析的为序列X的一、二阶矩。样本X服从GP分布。由于X为超定量洪峰的超门限部分,故GP分布的位置参数ζ为0。重现期T的设计洪峰超门限值部分x(T)的计算公式为:由于各年门限值不同,故每年对应X*的实际设计洪峰值X*(T)与当年门限值有关,计算公式为:xj*(T)=sj+x(T)。2. Frequency distribution of over-quantitative floods with time-varying threshold. Let X*=(x 1 *, ..., x i *, ..., x n *) represent the over-quantitative peak flow sequence extracted by time-varying threshold, n is the sequence length; X=(x 1 ,..., x i ,...,x n ) represent the part of the flood peak flow exceeding the threshold value; S=(s 1 ,...,s j ,...,s N ) is the threshold value of each year, and N is the number of years; then x i = xi *-s j , j is the year where xi is located. Denote the POT sequence as X, and the first and second moments of the sequence X are used for time-varying moment analysis. Sample X obeys GP distribution. Since X is the over-threshold part of the over-quantitative flood peak, the location parameter ζ of the GP distribution is 0. The formula for calculating the portion x(T) of the design flood peak exceeding the threshold value in the return period T is: Since the threshold value is different in each year, the actual design flood peak X*(T) corresponding to X* each year is related to the threshold value of the year, and the calculation formula is: x j *(T)=s j +x(T).
3.时间变化矩方法。具体实施方法与考虑历史洪水的超定量洪水频率分析相同。3. Time-varying moment method. The specific implementation method is the same as the over-quantitative flood frequency analysis considering historical floods.
实施例2Example 2
如图1~4所示,一种变化环境下超定量洪水非一致性分析系统,包括:样本分析去(POT超定量抽样法)、序列非一致性诊断、变化环境下超定量频率分析法(TVM频率分析模型)。As shown in Figures 1 to 4, a non-consistency analysis system for over-quantitative floods in changing environments includes: sample analysis (POT over-quantitative sampling method), sequence inconsistency diagnosis, and over-quantitative frequency analysis under changing environments ( TVM frequency analysis model).
变化环境下超定量洪水非一致性分析的工作过程如下:The working process of non-consistency analysis of overquantitative flood under changing environment is as follows:
1.所需数据1. Required data
如图5所示,以东江流域龙川、河源、博罗三站为例进行考虑门限值时变的超定量洪水频率分析,各水文站用于洪峰流量样本提取的数据为逐日流量过程。根据各站逐日流量过程,提取独立洪峰序列,先以年均超定量发生次数μ=10初步提取超定量洪峰用于时变门限值的确定及POT样本的提取。取μ=2.5为POT年均超定量发生次数,则采用回归分位数估计时变门限值时,确定分位数为75%,位于回归线以上的洪峰流量为最终获取的POT洪峰。采用分段门限值时,根据各站上游水库开始蓄水时间划分时间阶段,在各时间阶段内以μ=2.5分段提取POT序列。枫树坝水库于1973年10月开始蓄水,故龙川站分为1954年-1973年和1974年-2009年两个阶段;河源站受枫树坝、新丰江水库影响,由于新丰江水库影响前的阶段1954年-1959年时间太短,不单独分段,故河源站分段与龙川站相同;博罗站除受新丰江、枫树坝影响外,还有西枝江的白盆珠水库,故划分三个时间阶段:1954年-1973年、1974年-1984年、1985年-2009年。As shown in Figure 5, taking Longchuan, Heyuan, and Boluo stations in the Dongjiang River Basin as an example, the overquantitative flood frequency analysis considering the time-varying threshold value is carried out. The data used by each hydrological station for flood peak flow sample extraction is a daily flow process. According to the daily flow process of each station, the independent flood peak sequence is extracted, and the over-quantity flood peak is initially extracted with the annual average number of over-quantity occurrences μ = 10 for the determination of the time-varying threshold and the extraction of POT samples. Taking μ = 2.5 as the average annual over-quantity occurrence of POT, when using the regression quantile to estimate the time-varying threshold value, the quantile is determined to be 75%, and the flood peak flow above the regression line is the final POT flood peak. When using segmented thresholds, the time stages are divided according to the time when the upstream reservoirs of each station start storing water, and the POT sequence is extracted in segments with μ = 2.5 in each time stage. Fengshuba Reservoir began to store water in October 1973, so Longchuan Station was divided into two stages: 1954-1973 and 1974-2009; Heyuan Station was affected by Fengshuba and Xinfengjiang Reservoirs, and Xinfeng The period before the impact of the Jiang reservoir from 1954 to 1959 was too short to be divided into separate sections, so the sections of Heyuan Station were the same as those of Longchuan Station; apart from the impact of Xinfeng River and Fengshu Dam on Boluo Station, there were also Xizhi River's Baipenzhu Reservoir, so it is divided into three time periods: 1954-1973, 1974-1984, 1985-2009.
2.时变门限值的确定及POT样本提取2. Determination of time-varying threshold and POT sample extraction
2.1回归分位数确定的时变门限值2.1 Time-varying threshold value determined by regression quantile
基于日流量序列提取独立洪峰,并以POT年均发生次数μ=10初步提取POT序列,以该POT序列的75%回归分位数为门限值提取门限值时变的POT洪峰样本,由此提取的洪峰序列的POT年均发生次数μ=2.5,图5为各站μ=10提取的洪峰流量和对应的75%百分位数门限值,位于时变门限值曲线以上的洪峰流量为根据时变门限值提取的POT序列。Extract independent flood peaks based on the daily flow series, and initially extract the POT series with the average annual occurrence frequency of POT μ = 10, and use the 75% regression quantile of the POT series as the threshold to extract the time-varying POT flood peak samples. The average annual occurrence times of POT of the extracted flood peak sequence is μ=2.5, and Fig. 5 shows the flood peak flow extracted by each station μ=10 and the corresponding 75% percentile threshold value, and the flood peak located above the time-varying threshold value curve Traffic is the POT sequence extracted according to the time-varying threshold.
2.2分段门限值2.2 Segmentation Threshold
如图6所示,根据各水文站上游库开始蓄水时间,对日流量序列分段提取POT序列,各时段内POT年均发生次数μ取2.5,图6为各站μ=10提取的洪峰流量和各时段门限值,位于门限值曲线以上的洪峰流量为根据时变门限值提取的POT序列。As shown in Figure 6, according to the start time of water storage in the upstream reservoir of each hydrological station, the daily flow sequence is segmented to extract the POT sequence, and the average annual occurrence frequency of POT in each time period is taken as 2.5, and Figure 6 shows the flood peak extracted by each station with μ=10 The flow rate and the threshold value of each period, the peak flow rate above the threshold value curve is the POT sequence extracted according to the time-varying threshold value.
2.3序列非一致性诊断2.3 Sequence inconsistency diagnosis
采用M-K法对采用时变门限值提取的POT序列以及对应的POT序列发生次数序列进行趋势检验。根据M-K检验结果取5%显著性水平,采用线性时变和分段门限值提取的POT样本,对应的年发生次数序列均不具有显著趋势,可见基于时变门限值提取的超定量样本的年发生次数序列满足一致性假设。龙川和河源站POT序列具有显著下降趋势,博罗站POT序列具有下降趋势,但未达到5%显著性水平。The M-K method is used to test the trend of the POT sequence extracted with the time-varying threshold value and the corresponding POT sequence occurrence number sequence. According to the 5% significance level of the M-K test results, the POT samples extracted using linear time-varying and segmented thresholds have no significant trend in the corresponding annual occurrence frequency series. It can be seen that the over-quantitative samples extracted based on time-varying thresholds The annual occurrence sequence of satisfies the consistency assumption. The POT series of Longchuan and Heyuan stations had a significant downward trend, and the POT series of Boluo station had a downward trend, but it did not reach the 5% significance level.
对比分位数回归门限值和分段门限值所获取的POT年发生次数序列的M-K检验结果可知,龙川、河源站采用分位数回归门限值时的年发生次序列趋势较小,博罗站采用分段门限值时年发生次数序列趋势较小。因此进行考虑间矩的超定量洪水频率分析时,龙川、河源站采用位数回归门限值所提取的POT序列,博罗站采用分段门限值所提取的POT序列。Comparing the M-K test results of the POT annual occurrence sequence obtained by the quantile regression threshold value and the segmented threshold value, it can be seen that the trend of the annual occurrence sequence of Longchuan and Heyuan stations is small when the quantile regression threshold value is used , when Boluo station adopts segmented threshold value, the trend of annual frequency series is smaller. Therefore, when analyzing the over-quantitative flood frequency considering the moment, the Longchuan and Heyuan stations use the POT sequence extracted by the digit regression threshold value, and the Boluo station uses the POT sequence extracted by the segmented threshold value.
2.4最优趋势模型选择2.4 Optimal trend model selection
根据AIC准则选取东江三站由时变门限值获取的POT序列均值、标准差的最优趋势模型,选取AIC值最小的模型为优趋势,龙川、河源博罗站均为CP趋势最优,即POT序列均值、标准差为抛物线趋势,并以固定比例(CV)相关。3.变化环境下线型相应规律及设计洪峰流量变化According to the AIC criterion, the optimal trend model of the POT sequence mean and standard deviation obtained from the time-varying threshold value of the three stations in Dongjiang was selected, and the model with the smallest AIC value was selected as the optimal trend. Both Longchuan and Heyuan Boluo stations had the best CP trend , that is, the mean and standard deviation of the POT series have a parabolic trend and are related by a constant ratio (CV). 3. Corresponding law of line shape and design flood peak discharge change under changing environment
3.1变化环境下洪水线型响应规律3.1 Response law of flood line in changing environment
受水库调蓄影响,龙川、河源博罗站的根据时变门限值提取POT洪峰流量仍存在下降趋势。为研究不同变化阶段洪水频率曲线的情况,分析水利工程(主要是蓄水)对设计洪峰流量的影响,根据AIC准则选取东江三站由时变门限值获取的POT序列均值、标准差的最优趋势模型。根据时变门限值提取的POT序列重构为各特征时间基准点下的稳定POT序列,根据选取依据选择时间基准点。如图7所示,根据各时间基准点的稳定POT序列绘制洪水频率曲线,并与未考虑POT序列样本矩趋势特征的洪水频率配线结果进行对比。龙川站的3个时间基准点1962年、1989年和2009年分别代表枫树坝水库建前、建库后以及现状情况。枫树坝水调蓄影响之前,以1962年为代表时间基准点:与不考虑POT样本矩趋势(S模型)时的POT及GP洪水频率曲线对比,以该年为时间基准点重构的POT样本点据在实测POT样本点据上方,GP-CP频率曲线高水尾端较陡。以1989年和2009年代表枫树坝水库建成后的阶段,这两个时间基点对应的GP-CP曲线位置均在GP-S曲线下方,可见同量级洪水发生概率减小,说明龙川站超定量洪峰受水库调蓄削作用影响明显2009年GP-CP曲线位于1989年曲线上方,但2009年对应门限值小于1989年,故这两个时间点指定标准设计洪峰量级的关系有待进一步分析。Affected by reservoir regulation and storage, there is still a downward trend in the extraction of POT peak flow at Longchuan and Heyuan Boluo Stations based on time-varying thresholds. In order to study the situation of flood frequency curves in different stages and analyze the impact of water conservancy projects (mainly water storage) on the design flood peak discharge, according to the AIC criterion, the maximum value of the POT sequence mean and standard deviation obtained from the time-varying threshold value of the three stations of the Dongjiang River was selected. Optimal trend model. The POT sequence extracted according to the time-varying threshold value is reconstructed into a stable POT sequence under each characteristic time reference point, and the time reference point is selected according to the selection basis. As shown in Figure 7, the flood frequency curve is drawn according to the stable POT sequence at each time reference point, and compared with the flood frequency distribution result that does not consider the trend characteristics of the POT sequence sample moments. The three time reference points of Longchuan Station, 1962, 1989 and 2009, respectively represent the pre-construction, post-construction and current situation of Fengshuba Reservoir. Before the impact of Fengshu Dam water regulation and storage, the time reference point represented by 1962: Compared with the POT and GP flood frequency curves without considering the POT sample moment trend (S model), the reconstructed POT with this year as the time reference point The sample point data is above the measured POT sample point data, and the high end of the GP-CP frequency curve is steeper. Taking 1989 and 2009 to represent the stage after the completion of the Fengshuba Reservoir, the positions of the GP-CP curves corresponding to these two time base points are all below the GP-S curve. It can be seen that the probability of flood occurrence of the same magnitude is reduced, indicating that the Longchuan Station The over-quantitative flood peak is obviously affected by the adjustment and storage reduction of the reservoir. The GP-CP curve in 2009 is above the curve in 1989, but the corresponding threshold value in 2009 is smaller than that in 1989. Therefore, the relationship between the designated standard design flood peak magnitude at these two time points needs to be further studied. analyze.
河源站的4个时间基准点为1956年、1966年、1989年和2009年。在新丰江水库建库前,河源站流量不受水调蓄影响,1956年时间基准点重构POT序列及GP-CP曲线位于各时间基点频率的最上方,大量级洪水出现概较大。新丰江水库蓄水、枫树坝库建前,受新丰江调蓄影响,1966年时间基点的GP-CP曲线有所下降。枫树坝水库建成后,受两大水库蓄水影响,1989年和2009年的频率曲线均在GP-S曲线下方,大洪水出现概率显著下降。2009年GP-CP曲线位于1989年曲线上方,但2009年对应门限值小于1989年。河源站不同时间基准点的频率曲线变化规律与龙川站类似。The four time reference points of Heyuan station are 1956, 1966, 1989 and 2009. Before the construction of Xinfengjiang Reservoir, the flow at Heyuan Station was not affected by water regulation and storage. The reconstructed POT sequence and GP-CP curve at the time reference point in 1956 were at the top of the frequency at each time base point, and the occurrence of large-scale floods was likely to be relatively large. Before the Xinfengjiang Reservoir was impounded and the Fengshuba Reservoir was built, the GP-CP curve at the time base point of 1966 declined somewhat due to the impact of Xinfengjiang's regulation and storage. After the completion of the Fengshuba Reservoir, affected by the water storage of the two major reservoirs, the frequency curves in 1989 and 2009 were both below the GP-S curve, and the probability of major floods dropped significantly. The GP-CP curve in 2009 is above the curve in 1989, but the corresponding threshold value in 2009 is smaller than that in 1989. The changing law of frequency curves at different time reference points at Heyuan Station is similar to that at Longchuan Station.
博罗站5个时间基准点分别为1956年、1966年、1978年、1994年和2009年。1956年、1966年和1978年的GP-CP频率曲线高水尾部逐渐趋于平缓,曲线位置下移其中1966年的频率曲线与GP-S曲线较相似。以上几个时间点频率变化特征表明大洪水出现概率显著下降。1994年GP-CP曲线与1978年几乎重合,但1994年对应门限值小于1978年,故1994年大洪水出现概率小于1978年。2009年频率曲线位于1994年曲线上方,两时间基准点对应门限值相同故年曲线上方,两时间基准点对应门限值相同故年曲线上方,两时间基准点对应门限值相同,故2009年大洪水出现概率大于1994年,与其他时间点设计值的关系有待进一步分析。The five time reference points of Boluo Station are 1956, 1966, 1978, 1994 and 2009 respectively. The high water tail of the GP-CP frequency curves in 1956, 1966 and 1978 gradually became flat, and the position of the curves moved down. The frequency curve in 1966 was similar to the GP-S curve. The frequency change characteristics of the above several time points indicate that the probability of major floods has decreased significantly. The GP-CP curve in 1994 almost coincides with that in 1978, but the corresponding threshold value in 1994 is smaller than that in 1978, so the probability of a major flood in 1994 is lower than that in 1978. The frequency curve in 2009 is above the curve in 1994. The threshold values corresponding to the two time reference points are the same, so the year curve is above the curve. The threshold values corresponding to the two time reference points are the same. The occurrence probability of major floods in one year is greater than that in 1994, and the relationship with the design values at other time points needs to be further analyzed.
3.2设计洪峰流量变化特征3.2 Design peak discharge change characteristics
考虑门限值时变和POT序列均值、标准差变化趋势后,指定标准的设计洪峰流量为随时间变化的量,为探讨变化环境对洪峰流量设计值的影响,本文基于前面所选各站最优趋势模型,分析指点标准下(100年一遇)洪峰流量1954~2009年随时间的变化过程。After considering the time-varying threshold value and the change trend of the mean value and standard deviation of the POT sequence, the designated standard design peak flow is a quantity that changes with time. In order to explore the influence of the changing environment on the design value of the flood peak flow, this paper bases An optimal trend model is used to analyze the change process of flood peak discharge over time from 1954 to 2009 under the guiding standard (once in 100 years).
稳定模型,即门限值固定且不考虑超定量样本矩时变条件下,龙川站100年一遇洪峰流量为7141m3/s。考虑门限值线性时变且POT样本矩以CP趋势时变后,随时间推移,龙川站100年一遇设计洪峰流量先减小,变化幅度逐渐减小;洪水量级由1954年约12000m3/s减小至4000m3/s,1995年后洪峰流量有所增大。In the stable model, that is, under the condition that the threshold value is fixed and the overquantity sample moment is not considered, the 100-year flood peak discharge at Longchuan station is 7141m 3 /s. Considering the linear time-varying threshold value and the time-varying POT sample moment with the CP trend, as time goes by, the 100-year design flood peak discharge of Longchuan Station decreases first, and the range of change gradually decreases; the flood magnitude is about 12000m 3 /s decreased to 4000m 3 /s, and after 1995, the peak discharge increased somewhat.
河源站稳定条件下计算的100年一遇设计洪峰为10748m3/s,考虑门限值线性时变且POT样本矩以CP趋势时变后,设计洪峰流量变化特征与龙川站相似但变化幅度大于龙川站。1954年洪水量级约15000m3/s,至1995年已减小至4100m3/s,在1995年后有所增大,2009年时大于5000m3/s。The once-in-100-year design flood peak calculated under stable conditions at Heyuan Station is 10748m 3 /s. After considering the linear time-varying threshold value and the time-varying CP trend of the POT sample moment, the design flood peak discharge characteristics are similar to those at Longchuan Station, but the magnitude of change is It is bigger than Longchuan Station. The magnitude of the flood in 1954 was about 15000m 3 /s, which decreased to 4100m 3 /s in 1995, increased after 1995, and exceeded 5000m 3 /s in 2009.
博罗站稳定条件下计算的100年一遇设计洪峰为13032m3/s。博罗站门限值为分段时变,POT样本矩以CP趋势变化。由于不同阶段取门限值,博罗站100年一遇设计洪峰变化过程非平滑曲线,而是在年一遇设计洪峰变化过程非平滑曲线,而是在年一遇设计洪峰变化过程非平滑曲线,而是在1974年和1985年存在突变。1954-1973年和1974-1984年两个阶段,博罗站洪峰流量随时间变化而减小,1985-2009年洪峰流量有所增大。The 100-year design flood peak calculated under stable conditions at Boluo Station is 13032m 3 /s. The threshold value of Boluo station is time-varying in segments, and the sample moment of POT changes in CP trend. Due to the threshold values taken at different stages, the 100-year design flood peak change process of Boluo station is not a smooth curve, but the design flood peak change process of the 1-year design flood peak is an unsmooth curve, but the 1-year design flood peak change process is an unsmooth curve , but there were mutations in 1974 and 1985. During the two stages of 1954-1973 and 1974-1984, the peak flow of Boluo Station decreased with time, and the peak flow of Boluo Station increased from 1985 to 2009.
指定标准下(百年一遇)设计洪峰流量随时间变化情况表明,东江三站指定标准的设计洪峰流量量级总体上存在由大变小,再有所回升的趋势。如果不考虑序列非一致性处理,采用传统方法计算龙川、河源、博罗站百年一遇设计洪水分别为7141m3/s、10748m3/s和13032m3/s。而考虑门限值时变及POT样本矩变化趋势后,传统方法计算的设计洪峰值出现在1960-1970年期间,该期间各站流量过程受水库调蓄影响较少,而在70年代后,受水库调蓄影响,设计洪峰均小于传统方法计算结果,若不考虑洪峰样本非一致性,洪水频率分析结果会高估设计洪水量级。The change of design peak discharge under the specified standard (once in a hundred years) with time shows that the magnitude of the design peak discharge of the designated standards of the three stations of the Dongjiang River has generally changed from large to small, and then has a tendency to rise again. If sequence inconsistency processing is not considered, the 100-year design floods of Longchuan, Heyuan and Boluo stations calculated by traditional methods are 7141m 3 /s, 10748m 3 /s and 13032m 3 /s respectively. After considering the time-varying threshold value and the variation trend of POT sample moments, the design flood peak value calculated by the traditional method appeared in the period from 1960 to 1970. During this period, the flow process of each station was less affected by reservoir regulation and storage. Affected by reservoir regulation and storage, the design flood peaks are smaller than the traditional calculation results. If the inconsistency of flood peak samples is not considered, the flood frequency analysis results will overestimate the design flood magnitude.
3.3非一致性方法与传统方法重现期对比3.3 Comparison of non-consistent method and traditional method return period
以现状2009年为时间基准点,考虑门限值变的非一致处理后指定标洪峰流量与基于一致性假设的传统分析结果差异度。趋势项用SS表示既不考虑门限值时变,也既不考虑门限值时变,也POT样本矩时变的稳定状态;MS表示门限值时变,POT样本矩稳定;E_MS表示MS模型计算的设值与SS模型设计值的差异度。Taking the current situation in 2009 as the time reference point, considering the inconsistency treatment of the threshold value change, the difference between the designated standard flood peak flow and the traditional analysis results based on the consistency assumption is considered. The trend item uses SS to represent a stable state that neither considers the time-varying threshold value nor the time-varying threshold value, nor the time-varying POT sample moment; MS represents the time-varying threshold value and the stable POT sample moment; E_MS represents MS The degree of difference between the set value calculated by the model and the design value of the SS model.
表2表明:龙川站非一致性处理后设计洪峰均小于基于一致性假设的计算结果;只考虑门限值时变的计算与基于一致性假设洪峰差异度约为10%,差异程度随重现期增大而略有减小;考虑门限值时POT样本矩以CP趋势时变后,与传统方法计算结果的差异程度大于30%,且差异度随重现期的增大而增大。河源站非一致性处理后设计洪峰均小于基于一致性假设的计算结果,且差异度均随重现期增大而增大,考虑POT样本矩时变的差异度大于未考虑POT样本矩时变的情况;重现期为100年时,MS模型与SS模型差异度达25%,CP模型与SS模型差异度达51%。博罗站MS模型计算结果小于SS模型,差异度随重现期增大而增大,100年重现期时差异度为15%;CP模型与SS模型的关系与龙川、河源站不同,在重现期小于20时,CP模型计算结果略大于SS模型,重现期超过30年后,CP模型计算结果小于SS模型,且差异程度随重现期增大而增大,100年重现期时差异度为5.5%。Table 2 shows that the design flood peaks of Longchuan station after non-consistency treatment are all smaller than the calculation results based on the consistency assumption; The current period increases but slightly decreases; when the threshold value is considered, the POT sample moment changes with the CP trend, and the difference between the calculation result and the traditional method is greater than 30%, and the difference increases with the increase of the return period . The design flood peaks of the Heyuan station after inconsistency treatment are all smaller than the calculation results based on the consistency assumption, and the degree of difference increases with the increase of the return period. The difference degree considering the time variation of POT sample moments is greater than that without considering the time variation of POT sample moments When the return period is 100 years, the difference between MS model and SS model reaches 25%, and the difference between CP model and SS model reaches 51%. The calculated results of the MS model at Boluo Station are smaller than those of the SS model, and the difference increases with the increase of the return period, and the difference is 15% at the 100-year return period; the relationship between the CP model and the SS model is different from that of Longchuan and Heyuan stations. When the return period is less than 20, the calculation result of the CP model is slightly larger than that of the SS model. After the return period exceeds 30 years, the calculation result of the CP model is smaller than that of the SS model, and the degree of difference increases with the increase of the return period. The time difference is 5.5%.
表2门限值时变处理(t0=2009)与传统方法估计设计洪峰差异程度相同或相似的标号对应相同或相似的部件;Table 2 The time-varying processing of the threshold value (t0=2009) and the traditional method estimate the same or similar design flood peak difference. The labels correspond to the same or similar components;
附图中描述位置关系的用语仅用于示例性说明,不能理解为对本专利的限制;The terms describing the positional relationship in the drawings are only for illustrative purposes and cannot be interpreted as limitations on this patent;
显然,本发明的上述实施例仅仅是为清楚地说明本发明所作的举例,而并非是对本发明的实施方式的限定。对于所属领域的普通技术人员来说,在上述说明的基础上还可以做出其它不同形式的变化或变动。这里无需也无法对所有的实施方式予以穷举。凡在本发明的精神和原则之内所作的任何修改、等同替换和改进等,均应包含在本发明权利要求的保护范围之内。Apparently, the above-mentioned embodiments of the present invention are only examples for clearly illustrating the present invention, rather than limiting the implementation of the present invention. For those of ordinary skill in the art, on the basis of the above description, other changes or changes in different forms can also be made. It is not necessary and impossible to exhaustively list all the implementation manners here. All modifications, equivalent replacements and improvements made within the spirit and principles of the present invention shall be included within the protection scope of the claims of the present invention.
Claims (7)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710159692.8A CN107066425B (en) | 2017-03-17 | 2017-03-17 | A method for non-consistency analysis of ultra-quantitative floods in changing environments |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710159692.8A CN107066425B (en) | 2017-03-17 | 2017-03-17 | A method for non-consistency analysis of ultra-quantitative floods in changing environments |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN107066425A true CN107066425A (en) | 2017-08-18 |
CN107066425B CN107066425B (en) | 2020-08-14 |
Family
ID=59620043
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710159692.8A Active CN107066425B (en) | 2017-03-17 | 2017-03-17 | A method for non-consistency analysis of ultra-quantitative floods in changing environments |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN107066425B (en) |
Cited By (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107797969A (en) * | 2017-10-30 | 2018-03-13 | 中国水利水电科学研究院 | A kind of determination method and device of flood retrieving parameter |
CN108009565A (en) * | 2017-11-07 | 2018-05-08 | 中山大学 | River network design flood level computational methods under one kind variation environment |
CN109753633A (en) * | 2018-12-05 | 2019-05-14 | 中国能源建设集团江苏省电力设计院有限公司 | A kind of structures under wind Failure risk evaluation method based on non-stationary GEV distributed model |
CN110020469A (en) * | 2019-03-21 | 2019-07-16 | 武汉大学 | Flood warning analysis method and system based on Poisson regression and space filter value |
CN110598315A (en) * | 2019-09-10 | 2019-12-20 | 太原理工大学 | Uncertainty analysis method for non-uniform design flood in watershed under changing conditions |
CN111080059A (en) * | 2019-11-11 | 2020-04-28 | 天津大学 | Non-uniform multi-source flood encounter risk analysis method |
CN111241478A (en) * | 2020-01-08 | 2020-06-05 | 南京大学 | Flood frequency estimation method considering historical flood |
CN111488679A (en) * | 2020-04-03 | 2020-08-04 | 中国能源建设集团江苏省电力设计院有限公司 | Method for calculating non-uniform wind speed sequence design wind speed |
CN112183870A (en) * | 2020-10-09 | 2021-01-05 | 黄河水利委员会黄河水利科学研究院 | An Uncertainty Analysis Method of Design Flood Based on Time Variation of Superquantitative Flood |
CN114580171A (en) * | 2022-03-03 | 2022-06-03 | 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 | Method for identifying river basin flood type and analyzing influence factors of river basin flood type |
CN114595425A (en) * | 2021-12-20 | 2022-06-07 | 西安理工大学 | Method for diagnosing and analyzing inconsistent mutation points of runoff relation of drainage basin rainfall |
CN114970187A (en) * | 2022-06-09 | 2022-08-30 | 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 | A method to realize unbiased estimation of hydroclimate time series trends |
CN118395192A (en) * | 2024-06-26 | 2024-07-26 | 中南民族大学 | Regional frequency analysis method of non-stationary flood considering the influence of climate and reservoir |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105178240A (en) * | 2015-06-08 | 2015-12-23 | 武汉大学 | Optimization method for drawing P-III type distribution frequency curve |
-
2017
- 2017-03-17 CN CN201710159692.8A patent/CN107066425B/en active Active
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105178240A (en) * | 2015-06-08 | 2015-12-23 | 武汉大学 | Optimization method for drawing P-III type distribution frequency curve |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
Title |
---|
W.G STRUPCZEWSKI,V.P.SINGH,W.FELUCH: "Non-stationary approach to at-site flood frequency modeling I. Maximum likelihood estimation", 《JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY》 * |
叶长青,陈晓宏,张家鸣,朱爱萍,张丽娟: "具有趋势变异的非一致性东江流域洪水序列频率计算研究", 《自然资源学报》 * |
张丽娟,陈晓宏,叶长青,张家鸣: "考虑分组历史洪水的超定量洪水频率分析", 《水力发电学报》 * |
Cited By (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107797969A (en) * | 2017-10-30 | 2018-03-13 | 中国水利水电科学研究院 | A kind of determination method and device of flood retrieving parameter |
CN108009565A (en) * | 2017-11-07 | 2018-05-08 | 中山大学 | River network design flood level computational methods under one kind variation environment |
CN109753633A (en) * | 2018-12-05 | 2019-05-14 | 中国能源建设集团江苏省电力设计院有限公司 | A kind of structures under wind Failure risk evaluation method based on non-stationary GEV distributed model |
CN110020469B (en) * | 2019-03-21 | 2022-07-19 | 武汉大学 | Poisson regression and spatial filtering value-based flood early warning analysis method and system |
CN110020469A (en) * | 2019-03-21 | 2019-07-16 | 武汉大学 | Flood warning analysis method and system based on Poisson regression and space filter value |
CN110598315A (en) * | 2019-09-10 | 2019-12-20 | 太原理工大学 | Uncertainty analysis method for non-uniform design flood in watershed under changing conditions |
CN110598315B (en) * | 2019-09-10 | 2022-11-18 | 太原理工大学 | Uncertainty analysis method for basin non-uniformity design flood under variable conditions |
CN111080059A (en) * | 2019-11-11 | 2020-04-28 | 天津大学 | Non-uniform multi-source flood encounter risk analysis method |
CN111241478A (en) * | 2020-01-08 | 2020-06-05 | 南京大学 | Flood frequency estimation method considering historical flood |
CN111488679B (en) * | 2020-04-03 | 2022-06-10 | 中国能源建设集团江苏省电力设计院有限公司 | Method for calculating non-uniform wind speed sequence design wind speed |
CN111488679A (en) * | 2020-04-03 | 2020-08-04 | 中国能源建设集团江苏省电力设计院有限公司 | Method for calculating non-uniform wind speed sequence design wind speed |
CN112183870A (en) * | 2020-10-09 | 2021-01-05 | 黄河水利委员会黄河水利科学研究院 | An Uncertainty Analysis Method of Design Flood Based on Time Variation of Superquantitative Flood |
CN112183870B (en) * | 2020-10-09 | 2023-09-01 | 黄河水利委员会黄河水利科学研究院 | Design flood uncertainty analysis method based on super-quantitative flood time variability |
CN114595425A (en) * | 2021-12-20 | 2022-06-07 | 西安理工大学 | Method for diagnosing and analyzing inconsistent mutation points of runoff relation of drainage basin rainfall |
CN114595425B (en) * | 2021-12-20 | 2024-08-16 | 西安理工大学 | Diagnostic analysis method for inconsistency mutation point of precipitation-runoff relationship in a watershed |
CN114580171A (en) * | 2022-03-03 | 2022-06-03 | 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 | Method for identifying river basin flood type and analyzing influence factors of river basin flood type |
CN114580171B (en) * | 2022-03-03 | 2022-09-30 | 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 | A method for identification of watershed flood types and analysis of their influencing factors |
CN114970187A (en) * | 2022-06-09 | 2022-08-30 | 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 | A method to realize unbiased estimation of hydroclimate time series trends |
CN114970187B (en) * | 2022-06-09 | 2024-04-16 | 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 | A method for unbiased estimation of hydroclimatic time series trends |
CN118395192A (en) * | 2024-06-26 | 2024-07-26 | 中南民族大学 | Regional frequency analysis method of non-stationary flood considering the influence of climate and reservoir |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN107066425B (en) | 2020-08-14 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN107066425A (en) | Overdetermination amount flood nonuniformity analysis method under a kind of changing environment | |
CN107992961B (en) | An Adaptive Model Framework for Mid- and Long-Term Runoff Forecasting in Watersheds | |
CN111104981A (en) | A method and system for evaluating the accuracy of hydrological forecasting based on machine learning | |
CN110276104B (en) | A method for estimating floods in staged design under an ensemble climate model | |
CN107093013B (en) | A hydrological situation evaluation method considering the distribution law of hydrological indicators | |
CN108955652A (en) | A kind of hydrology nonuniformity sequence reconstructing method | |
CN113780684A (en) | A method for predicting energy consumption behavior of smart building users based on LSTM neural network | |
CN107886160B (en) | BP neural network interval water demand prediction method | |
CN105023066A (en) | Business expansion analytical prediction system and method based on seasonal adjustment | |
CN106598918A (en) | Non-uniform designed flood calculation method based on quantile regression | |
CN110728409A (en) | A Flood Process Type Similarity Mining and Fast Prediction Method | |
CN109902267B (en) | River channel safety discharge amount calculation method influenced by downstream lake jacking | |
CN112183870B (en) | Design flood uncertainty analysis method based on super-quantitative flood time variability | |
CN107040412A (en) | A kind of Cloud Server load predicting method | |
CN115542236B (en) | Electric energy meter operation error estimation method and device | |
CN109635372A (en) | Design flood method based on the Bayesian model for improving prior probability | |
CN109919362B (en) | A medium and long-term runoff forecasting method considering the influence of water conservancy project dispatch | |
Lei et al. | The analysis and improvement of the fuzzy weighted optimum curve-fitting method of Pearson–type III distribution | |
CN117788016A (en) | Carbon emission comprehensive efficiency evaluation method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
CN114970082B (en) | Non-uniform design flood estimation method | |
CN110648023A (en) | The Establishment Method of Data Prediction Model Based on Quadratic Exponential Smoothing Improved GM(1,1) | |
CN106557614B (en) | Flood frequency analysis method based on Halphen IB distribution | |
CN117035417A (en) | Method, system, equipment and medium for assessing risk of underwater descent in irrigation area | |
CN111080115B (en) | Water consumption distribution method and device based on water supply hydraulic model | |
CN108009565B (en) | Method for calculating design flood level of river network area under variable environment |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
EE01 | Entry into force of recordation of patent licensing contract |
Application publication date: 20170818 Assignee: Guangzhou Kangpusi Network Technology Co.,Ltd. Assignor: SUN YAT-SEN University Contract record no.: X2023980054174 Denomination of invention: A method for analyzing non consistency of ultra quantitative floods in changing environments Granted publication date: 20200814 License type: Common License Record date: 20231227 Application publication date: 20170818 Assignee: Huanyi (Guangdong) emergency safety Technology Group Co.,Ltd. Assignor: SUN YAT-SEN University Contract record no.: X2023980053955 Denomination of invention: A method for analyzing non consistency of ultra quantitative floods in changing environments Granted publication date: 20200814 License type: Common License Record date: 20231225 |
|
EE01 | Entry into force of recordation of patent licensing contract |