CN106934590A - The automatic method and system for formulating the plan of examination - Google Patents
The automatic method and system for formulating the plan of examination Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106934590A CN106934590A CN201710051195.6A CN201710051195A CN106934590A CN 106934590 A CN106934590 A CN 106934590A CN 201710051195 A CN201710051195 A CN 201710051195A CN 106934590 A CN106934590 A CN 106934590A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- plan
- project
- involvement level
- authorization
- examination
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
- G06Q10/103—Workflow collaboration or project management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0637—Strategic management or analysis, e.g. setting a goal or target of an organisation; Planning actions based on goals; Analysis or evaluation of effectiveness of goals
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Present invention is disclosed the method and system that a kind of automatic formulation examines plan, the system includes involvement level evaluation module, examines plan generation module, examines schedule determining module, generating algorithm autonomous learning module.Involvement level evaluation module, is used to assess involvement level；Plan generation module is examined, is used to generate examination plan；Schedule determining module is examined, is used to determine examination plan；Generating algorithm autonomous learning module, is used to edit generating algorithm.Automatic formulation proposed by the present invention examines the method and system of plan, formulates thinner according to granularity；The inventive method generation result is objective simultaneously；The examination plan proposed projects for automatically generating is without any personal subjective colo(u)r, it is ensured that each authorization project plan that authorization mechanism formulates is not in relatively large deviation, it is also possible to make up the uneven shortcoming of authorization personnel experience, specialized capability.
Description
Technical field
The invention belongs to computer software technical field, it is related to a kind of examination ways to draw up the plan, more particularly to one kind is certainly
The dynamic method for formulating the plan of examination；Meanwhile, the invention further relates to the system that a kind of automatic formulation examines plan.
Background technology
It is for high security related system, such as civil aviation, track traffic, nuclear power heavy industry, medicine equipment and military
System, the authoritative institution in its residing field or tissue typically can all promulgate relevant criterion, it is ensured that the safety and reliability of system
It is required that being guaranteed.
By taking civil aviation field as an example, civil aircraft can meet under predetermined running environment and restricting condition for use
Minimum safe standard, and the prerequisite quality of the institute referred to as airworthiness that can smoothly fly.The airworthiness management of civil aircraft, be with
The security for ensureing civil aircraft is target, and seaworthiness department of government is right on the basis of various minimum safe standards have been formulated
The design of civil aircraft, the link such as manufacture, use and repair and carry out examination, identification, the supervision and management of scientific unity.Seaworthiness
Authorize as a part for airworthiness management, be to authorize mechanism by the life cycle data of auditing system, Project Process and record,
And other evidences carry out the accordance of evaluation item and authorization basic target.Examination includes document reading, project personnel's interview, reality
The process of applying is witnessed, sampling of data and the short-term diversified forms such as participate in.With reference to actual conditions, examination may be completed in desk,
May need to complete at the scene.Therefore, authorization mechanism is needed for each specific authorization project, assesses involvement level, and according to
This formulates the plan of examination, instructs to complete authorization work.
By taking the authorization of civilian seaworthiness software as an example, Fig. 1 is existing examination plan flow chart.Authorization mechanism obtains first
The project grade of pending project is taken, involvement level is calculated according to relevant evaluation criterion (such as researching and developing unit experience, ability)
Total score, involvement level report is write with reference to both, and content includes：The brief introduction of Project-developing unit, involvement level score, Yi Jijian
The involvement level general introduction of view.Then the involvement level report according to document form, examination plan is made with reference to experience.
Existing examination ways to draw up the plan, has the following disadvantages：
(1) formulate thicker according to granularity；The content of involvement level assessment report is general introduction and summing-up, and length typically exists
Page 1~2 or so.The plan of examination is formulated according to the report content of summing-up, possibly cannot be considered or be ignored part details so that examined
The plan of looking into cannot meet project and be actually needed.
(2) it is subjective；Examination plan is write by authorizing mechanism related personnel by experience is purely manual, with very
Strong subjective composition, the examination plan deviation that different people may be caused to formulate same project is very big.
(3) it is unfavorable for accumulating historical experience；Although the data of history authorization project can achieve form and retain and browse,
Check that a large amount of historical summaries are probably unpractical as reference when examination plan is actually formulated.So result in project experiences
Accumulation be often limited to the expert of small part participation, and whole team cannot be benefited.
In view of this, nowadays in the urgent need to designing a kind of new examination task executing method, to overcome existing examination to appoint
The drawbacks described above of executive mode of being engaged in.
The content of the invention
The technical problems to be solved by the invention are：A kind of method of automatic formulation examination plan is provided, examination can be improved
The reasonability of plan.
Additionally, the present invention also provides a kind of system of automatic formulation examination plan, can improve and examine the reasonable of plan
Property.
In order to solve the above technical problems, the present invention is adopted the following technical scheme that：
A kind of method that automatic formulation examines plan, it is characterised in that methods described includes：
Step S1, assessment involvement level step；
Involvement level refer in project checking process, determine authorization mechanism in checking process when, with which kind of degree,
Which field accordance is participated in examine；The assessment of involvement level need to be carried out in each authorization project initiation and its knot is recorded
Really, planned as soon as possible and assessment item details with alloing authorization mechanism and researching and developing unit；Assessment result causes authorization
The involvement level of the high, medium and low Three Estate of mechanism, involvement level will be put into the meter for formulating examination plan or other equal rules
Draw document consider in；Therefore before the examination plan that is ranked, the involvement level of authorization project need to first be assessed；The system will be assessed and is situated between
Enter degree and be divided into three work, respectively：Identify project grade, calculate every score and confirm additional conditions；
Identify project grade：The first foundation of system evaluation involvement level is the project grade of pending project；Project etc.
Level is obtained automatically by system from defined " authorization project information data "；
Calculate every score：Except project grade, it is necessary to could full assessment Jie according to other " involvement level criterions "
Enter degree；Predefined each " involvement level criterion " corresponding scoring item in system database, its content includes：Comment
Valency criterion, score range, Score index；System carries out automatic scoring to each index one by one according to the project data of input, respectively
The summation of item rating is assessment total score；The involvement level of authorization project can be determined using total score integration project grade；
Determine additional conditions：Additional conditions do not influence the assessment of involvement level typically, but will examine plan as formulation
Important evidence；The additional conditions that system can record authorization project are considered as assessment；Additional conditions are referred to except project grade
With the situation that any beyond involvement level criterion may influence authorization project；These situations are divided into can be quantified and can not quantify two
Kind；As factor of influence be used to quantifiable additional conditions to automatically generate examination plan by system, without quantifiable extra feelings
Condition then by the form of list, the reference information of examination plan is finally determined as user；Quantifiable additional conditions include：
(1) workload of mechanism is authorized；By all authorization project information recorded in system database, can obtain in this automatically
Hold；(2) resource of mechanism is authorized；By the authorization resource information recorded in system database, this content is obtained automatically；
Step S2, generation examine plan step；
After assessing the involvement level of authorization project, it is possible to automatically generate examination meter using generating algorithm by assessment result
Draw；Remove outside the timing node of examination activity, the content of examination plan includes：The Designated Engineering Representatives quantity of authorization project, head
Whether whether seat or Senior Expert participate in, in-process review and the on the desk number of times for examining, merge inspection phase, the side of being investigated and need submission
Project data；
First, for these content items, according to involvement level it is low, in or it is high, it may be determined that a span substantially,
And corresponding generating algorithm；Then, by generating algorithm using every score in " involvement level criterion " as parameter, with reference to
Parameters weighting calculates the concrete outcome of each program content of the above automatically；
Under given involvement level, examine that each single item content in the works all correspond to an independent generating algorithm,
The parameter of generating algorithm includes that all or part of " involvement level criterion " must itemize, and all quantifies additional conditions；So,
After involvement level scoring work is completed, system just can calculate every result, and accordingly generate careful automatically according to algorithm
Look into the proposed projects of plan；
Step S3, determination examine plan step；
After system automatically generates the proposed projects of examination plan, user can check and Editing plan.Counted examining
Drawing editing interface can list file names with all additional conditions that can not quantify defined in step sl as reference, and user is according to certainly
Body experience, again modification adjustment examines plan, and determines final version；
Step S4, generating algorithm autonomous learning step；
Automatically generated after formula is all editable examination plan proposed projects in user's modification adjustment, difference will be compared,
Itself algorithm weights factor is adjusted according to difference comparison result, it is allowed to which device is autonomous during continuing on to improve formula calculation
Method, it is ensured that result of calculation more meets being actually needed for user；After adjustment examines plan, generation formula algorithm is improved, as item
Mesh experience accumulation data.
A kind of method that automatic formulation examines plan, methods described includes：
Step S1, involvement level appraisal procedure；Assessment determines the involvement level of authorization mechanism；
Step S2, the plan step of examination generate rapid；
Step S3, the plan of examination determine step；
Step S4, generating algorithm autonomous learning step.
Used as a preferred embodiment of the present invention, in step S1, involvement level refers in project checking process, to determine to examine
Determine mechanism in checking process when, with which kind of degree, which field to participate in accordance in and examine；In each authorization project initiation
When need to carry out the assessment of involvement level and record as a result, planning as soon as possible and commenting to allow authorization mechanism and research and develop unit
Valency Entry Details；Assessment result causes to authorize the involvement level of the high, medium and low Three Estate of mechanism, and involvement level will be arranged
The planning documentations for entering to formulate examination plan or other equal rules consider；Therefore before the examination plan that is ranked, need to first assess
The involvement level of authorization project；The system is divided into three work by involvement level is assessed, respectively：Identify project grade, calculate
Every score and confirmation additional conditions；
Identify project grade：The first foundation of system evaluation involvement level is the project grade of pending project；Project etc.
Level is obtained automatically by system from defined " authorization project information data "；
Calculate every score：Except project grade, it is necessary to could full assessment Jie according to other " involvement level criterions "
Enter degree；Predefined each " involvement level criterion " corresponding scoring item in system database, its content includes：Comment
Valency criterion, score range, Score index；The system carries out automatic scoring to each index one by one according to the project data of input,
The summation of each item rating is assessment total score；The involvement level of authorization project can be determined using total score integration project grade；
Determine additional conditions：Additional conditions do not influence the assessment of involvement level typically, but will examine plan as formulation
Important evidence；The additional conditions that the system can record authorization project are considered as assessment；Additional conditions are referred to except project etc.
Any situation that may influence authorization project beyond level and involvement level criterion；These situations are divided into can be quantified and can not quantify
Two kinds；As factor of influence be used to quantifiable additional conditions to automatically generate examination plan by the system, without quantifiable volume
Outer situation then by the form of list, the reference information of examination plan is finally determined as user；Quantifiable additional conditions bag
Include：(1) workload of mechanism is authorized；By all authorization project information recorded in the system database, this is obtained automatically
Content；(2) resource of mechanism is authorized；By the authorization resource information recorded in the system database, this content is obtained automatically；
Other need the additional conditions that can not quantify that intelligence judges to potentially include：Project risk, the adjustment of project mid-term.
As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, in step S2, after assessing the involvement level of authorization project, tied by assessing
Fruit automatically generates examination plan using generating algorithm；Remove outside the timing node of examination activity, the content of examination plan includes：Examine
Determine the Designated Engineering Representatives quantity of project, chief or Senior Expert whether participate in, in-process review and the number of times for examining on the desk, whether
The project data that merging inspection phase, the side of being investigated need to submit to；
First, for these content items, according to involvement level it is low, in or it is high, it may be determined that a span substantially,
And corresponding generating algorithm；Then, by generating algorithm using every score in " involvement level criterion " as parameter, with reference to
Parameters weighting calculates the concrete outcome of each program content of the above automatically；
Under given involvement level, examine that each single item content in the works all correspond to an independent generating algorithm,
The parameter of generating algorithm includes that all or part of " involvement level criterion " must itemize, and all quantifies additional conditions；So,
After involvement level scoring work is completed, automatically according to algorithm, every result is calculated, and accordingly generate building for examination plan
View scheme.
Used as a preferred embodiment of the present invention, step S3 is specifically included：
After the system automatically generates the proposed projects of examination plan, user can check and Editing plan.Examining
Plan editing interface can list file names with all additional conditions that can not quantify defined in step sl as reference, user according to
Experience, again modification adjustment examines plan, and determines final version.
Used as a preferred embodiment of the present invention, in step S4, it is all to compile to automatically generate formula in user's modification adjustment
After the examination plan proposed projects collected, difference will be compared, itself algorithm weights factor is adjusted according to difference comparison result, it is allowed to fill
Put and independently improve formula algorithm during continuing on, it is ensured that result of calculation more meets being actually needed for user；Examined in adjustment
After the plan of looking into, generation formula algorithm is improved, data are accumulated as project experiences.
A kind of system that automatic formulation examines plan, the system includes：
Involvement level evaluation module, is used to assess involvement level；
Plan generation module is examined, is used to generate examination plan；
Schedule determining module is examined, is used to determine examination plan；
Generating algorithm autonomous learning module, to generating algorithm autonomous learning.
Used as a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the involvement level evaluation module is used to for assessment involvement level to be divided into three
Individual work, respectively：Identify project grade, calculate every score and confirm additional conditions；
Identify project grade：The first foundation of system evaluation involvement level is the project grade of pending project；Project etc.
Level is obtained automatically by system from defined " authorization project information data "；
Calculate every score：Except project grade, it is necessary to could full assessment Jie according to other " involvement level criterions "
Enter degree；Predefined each " involvement level criterion " corresponding scoring item in system database, its content includes：Comment
Valency criterion, score range, Score index；System carries out automatic scoring to each index one by one according to the project data of input, respectively
The summation of item rating is assessment total score；The involvement level of authorization project is determined using total score integration project grade；
Determine additional conditions：Additional conditions do not influence the assessment of involvement level typically, but will examine plan as formulation
Important evidence；The additional conditions of system record authorization project are considered as assessment；Additional conditions are referred to except project grade and Jie
Any situation that may influence authorization project for entering beyond degree criterion；These situations are divided into can be quantified and can not quantify two kinds；
As factor of influence be used to quantifiable additional conditions to automatically generate examination plan by system, without quantifiable additional conditions then
By the form of list, the reference information of examination plan is finally determined as user；Quantifiable additional conditions include：(1) examine
Determine the workload of mechanism；By all authorization project information recorded in system database, this content is obtained automatically；(2) examine
Determine the resource of mechanism；By the authorization resource information recorded in system database, this content is obtained automatically.
Used as a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the examination plan generation module is used to assess the intervention journey of authorization project
After degree, examination plan is automatically generated using generating algorithm by assessment result；Remove outside the timing node of examination activity, examine meter
The content drawn includes：Whether the Designated Engineering Representatives quantity of authorization project, chief or Senior Expert participate in, in-process review and desk
The number of times of examination, whether merge inspection phase, the project data that the side of being investigated need to submit to；
First, for these content items, according to involvement level it is low, in or it is high, it may be determined that a span substantially,
And corresponding generating algorithm；Then, by generating algorithm using every score in " involvement level criterion " as parameter, with reference to
Parameters weighting calculates the concrete outcome of each program content of the above automatically；
Under given involvement level, examine that each single item content in the works all correspond to an independent generating algorithm,
The parameter of generating algorithm includes that all or part of " involvement level criterion " must itemize, and all quantifies additional conditions；So,
After involvement level scoring work is completed, automatically according to algorithm, every result is calculated, and accordingly generate building for examination plan
View scheme.
Used as a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the examination schedule determining module is used to automatically generate examination meter in system
After the proposed projects drawn, user checks and Editing plan；Can be listed file names with examination plan editing interface all defined
Can not quantify additional conditions as reference, according to experience, modification adjustment again examines plan to user, and determines final version
This；
It is all editable examining that the generating algorithm autonomous learning module is used to automatically generate formula in user's modification adjustment
After looking into plan proposed projects, difference will be compared, itself algorithm weights factor is adjusted according to difference comparison result, it is allowed to which device is not
Independently formula algorithm is improved during disconnected use, it is ensured that result of calculation more meets being actually needed for user；Plan is examined in adjustment
Afterwards, generation formula algorithm is improved, data is accumulated as project experiences.
The beneficial effects of the present invention are：Automatic formulation proposed by the present invention examines the method and system of plan, formulate according to
It is thinner according to granularity；The system scores each involvement level item as the input of the generating algorithm for examining program content so that
Examining the formulating for each content of plan can consider enough details, and program content more conforms to actual conditions.
The inventive method generation result is objective；The examination plan proposed projects for automatically generating is without any personal subjective colour
It is color, it is ensured that each authorization project plan that authorization mechanism formulates is not in relatively large deviation, it is also possible to make up authorization personnel experience,
The uneven shortcoming of specialized capability.
The present invention is conducive to system to accumulate historical experience；The formulation experience of plan is examined each time, can be by using
Editor's algorithm function of the system is by empirical conversion for organization assetses are preserved so that the project warp that different Team Members obtain
Test, whole team can be shared with.
Brief description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is the existing flow chart formulated and examine method of planning.
Fig. 2 is the automatic flow chart for formulating examination method of planning of the invention.
Specific embodiment
The preferred embodiment that the invention will now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Embodiment one
Present invention is disclosed the method and system that a kind of automatic formulation examines plan.By defining multiple generating algorithms (such as
Formula), the result correspondence of each generating algorithm examines a content of plan, and involvement level is scored item as generating algorithm
Input, after involvement level is assessed, automatically generates a set of corresponding examination plan proposed projects.
Fig. 2 is referred to, Fig. 2 is basic flow sheet of the invention.Wherein " authorization project information data " and " approving standard,
The foundation and maintenance of target, operational data " are not belonging to the scope of the system, can be considered the defined content of the system database.
The automatic method for formulating examination plan of the invention comprises the following steps：
【Step LOI-01】Assessment involvement level step；
Involvement level refer in project checking process, determine authorization mechanism in checking process when, with which kind of degree,
Which field accordance is participated in examine.The assessment of involvement level need to be carried out in each authorization project initiation and its knot is recorded
Really, planned as soon as possible and assessment item details with alloing authorization mechanism and researching and developing unit.Assessment result causes authorization
The involvement level of the high, medium and low Three Estate of mechanism, involvement level will be put into the meter for formulating examination plan or other equal rules
Draw document consider in.Therefore before the examination plan that is ranked, the involvement level of authorization project need to first be assessed.The system will be assessed and is situated between
Enter degree and be divided into three work, respectively：Identify project grade, calculate every score and confirm additional conditions.
A () is identified project grade
The first foundation of the system evaluation involvement level is the project grade of pending project, with civil aircraft software/hardware seaworthiness
As a example by authorization, project grade can be divided into A, B, C and D grade, and the corresponding relation of project grade and involvement level is as shown in table 1.Project
Grade is obtained automatically by the system from defined " authorization project information data ".
The project grade criterion of table 1
| Project grade | Involvement level |
| D | It is low |
| C | It is low or in |
| B | In or it is high |
| A | In or it is high |
B () calculates every score
Except project grade, it is necessary to could full assessment involvement level according to other " involvement level criterions ".The system
Predefined each " involvement level criterion " corresponding scoring item in database, its content includes：Interpretational criteria, score value
Scope (basic, normal, high), Score index etc..The system carries out automatic scoring to each index one by one according to the project data of input,
The summation of each item rating is assessment total score (TSR, Total Score Result).Can be determined using total score integration project grade
The involvement level of authorization project, a possible application example is as shown in table 2.
Table 2 determines involvement level
| Total score (TSR) | Project grade A | Project grade B | Project grade C | Project grade D |
| TSR≤80 | It is high | It is high | In | It is low |
| 80 ＜ TSR≤130 | It is high | In | In | It is low |
| 130 ＜ TSR | In | In | It is low | It is low |
By taking the authorization of civil aircraft software/hardware seaworthiness as an example, " involvement level criterion " may include：Research and develop the certification experience of unit；Grind
Hair ability；Software/hardware service history；System complexity；Designated Engineering Representatives ability.
C () determines additional conditions
Additional conditions do not influence the assessment of involvement level typically, but the important evidence of plan will be examined as formulation.This is
The additional conditions that system can record authorization project are considered as assessment.Additional conditions are referred to except project grade and involvement level are accurate
Any beyond then may influence the situation of authorization project.These situations are divided into can be quantified and can not quantify two kinds.The system will
Quantifiable additional conditions are used to automatically generate examination plan (LOI-02) as factor of influence, without quantifiable additional conditions
Then by the form of list, the reference information of examination plan (LOI-03) is finally determined as user.Quantifiable additional conditions
Including：
I. the workload of mechanism is authorized；By all authorization project information recorded in the system database, can be automatic
Obtain this content.
Ii. the resource of mechanism is authorized；By the authorization resource information recorded in the system database, this can be automatically obtained
Item content.
Other need the additional conditions that can not quantify that intelligence judges to potentially include：Project risk, the adjustment of project mid-term etc..
Involvement level algorithm can be：
【Step LOI-02】Generation examines plan step；
After assessing the involvement level of authorization project, it is possible to automatically generate examination meter using generating algorithm by assessment result
Draw.Remove outside the timing node of examination activity, the content of examination plan includes：The Designated Engineering Representatives quantity of authorization project；It is first
Whether seat or Senior Expert participate in；In-process review and the number of times for examining on the desk；Whether inspection phase is merged；The side of being investigated needs to submit to
Project data.
First, for these content items, according to involvement level it is low, in or it is high, it may be determined that a span substantially,
And corresponding generating algorithm.For example：Involvement level is height, the minimum Designated Engineering Representatives quantity of correspondence；Involvement level for low,
The most Designated Engineering Representatives quantity of correspondence.Then, the system is obtained by generating algorithm with every in " involvement level criterion "
It is parameter to be allocated as, and incorporating parametric weight calculates the concrete outcome of each program content of the above automatically.
Under given involvement level, examine that each single item content in the works all correspond to an independent generating algorithm,
The parameter of generating algorithm includes that all or part of " involvement level criterion " must itemize (LOI-01-b), and it is all quantify it is extra
Situation (LOI-01-c).So, after involvement level scoring work is completed, the system can just be calculated automatically according to algorithm
Go out every result, and accordingly generate the proposed projects of examination plan.
Such as, in an embodiment of the invention, examine that program content includes：Designated Engineering Representatives quantity (DER), head
Xi expert participates in (CE), in-process review number of times (OR), examination number of times (DR) on the desk, inspection phase division (SOI), submission item number
According to (DATA) is collected, i.e.,：
Examine plan Plan={ DER, CE, OR, DR, SOI, DATA }.
Assuming that known involvement level be L, software project scale be S
1) Designated Engineering Representatives quantity (DER)
DER=α * S/L (α is Dynamic gene, default value 5)
2) principal expert participates in (CE)
CE=(L- β) %2 (β is Dynamic gene, default value 1)
3) in-process review number of times (OR)
OR=χ * S*arccos (x/2) (χ is Dynamic gene, default value 2.54)
4) it is on the desk to examine number of times (DR)
(μ is Dynamic gene to DR=μ * S-OR, and 4) default value is
5) inspection phase divides (SOI)
L=0, SOI={ SOI#1, (SOI#2, SOI#3, SOI#4) }
L=1, SOI={ SOI#1, (SOI#2, SOI#3), SOI#4 }
L=2, SOI={ SOI#1, SOI#2, SOI#3, SOI#4 }
6) project data collection (DATA) is submitted to
【Step LOI-03】It is determined that examining plan step；
After automatically generating the proposed projects of examination plan, user can check and Editing plan.Compiled in the plan of examination
Editing interface can list file names with all additional conditions that can not quantify defined in LOI-01-c as reference, and user can basis
Experience, again modification adjustment examines plan, and determines final version.
【Step LOI-04】Generating algorithm autonomous learning step；
Automatically generated after formula is all editable examination plan proposed projects in user's modification adjustment, difference will be compared,
Itself algorithm weights factor is adjusted according to difference comparison result, it is allowed to which device is autonomous during continuing on to improve formula calculation
Method, it is ensured that result of calculation more meets being actually needed for user；After adjustment examines plan, generation formula algorithm is improved, as item
Mesh experience accumulation data.
Embodiment two
The present invention also discloses a kind of system of automatic formulation examination plan, and the system includes：Involvement level evaluation module,
Examine plan generation module, examine schedule determining module, generating algorithm autonomous learning module.
Involvement level evaluation module, is used to assess involvement level；Plan generation module is examined, is used to generate examination plan；
Schedule determining module is examined, is used to determine examination plan；Generating algorithm autonomous learning module, to generating algorithm autonomous learning.
The specific implementation of modules is referred to the description of respective modules in embodiment one.
In sum, automatic formulation proposed by the present invention examines the method and system of plan, formulates thinner according to granularity；Should
System scores each involvement level item as the parameter of the generating algorithm for examining program content so that examine each of plan
Formulating for content can consider enough details, and program content more conforms to actual conditions.
The inventive method generation result is objective；The examination plan proposed projects for automatically generating is without any personal subjective colour
It is color, it is ensured that each authorization project plan that authorization mechanism formulates is not in relatively large deviation, it is also possible to make up authorization personnel experience,
The uneven shortcoming of specialized capability.
The present invention is conducive to system to accumulate historical experience；The formulation experience of plan is examined each time, can be by using
Editor's algorithm function of the system is by empirical conversion for organization assetses are preserved so that the project warp that different Team Members obtain
Test, whole team can be shared with.
Here description of the invention and application are illustrative, are not wishing to limit the scope of the invention to above-described embodiment
In.The deformation and change of embodiments disclosed herein are possible, real for those skilled in the art
The replacement and equivalent various parts for applying example are known.It should be appreciated by the person skilled in the art that not departing from the present invention
Spirit or essential characteristics in the case of, the present invention can in other forms, structure, arrangement, ratio, and with other components,
Material and part are realized.In the case where scope and spirit of the present invention are not departed from, embodiments disclosed herein can be entered
Other deformations of row and change.
Claims (10)
1. a kind of method that automatic formulation examines plan, it is characterised in that methods described includes：
Step S1, assessment involvement level step；
Involvement level refer in project checking process, determine authorization mechanism in checking process when, with which kind of degree, at which
A little fields participate in accordance and examine；Each authorization project initiation when need to carry out involvement level assessment and record as a result, with
So that authorization mechanism and research and development unit are planned and assessment item details as soon as possible；Assessment result cause authorization mechanism it is high, in,
The involvement level of low Three Estate, involvement level will be put into formulation examination plan consideration；Therefore it is planned in the examination that is ranked
Before, need to first assess the involvement level of authorization project；System is divided into three work by involvement level is assessed, respectively：Identify project
Grade, the every score of calculating and confirmation additional conditions；
Identify project grade：The first foundation of system evaluation involvement level is the project grade of pending project；Project grade by
System is obtained automatically from defined " authorization project information data "；
Calculate every score：Except project grade, it is necessary to could full assessment intervention journey according to other " involvement level criterions "
Degree；Predefined each " involvement level criterion " corresponding scoring item in system database, its content includes：Evaluate accurate
Then, score range, Score index；System carries out automatic scoring, Ge Xiangping to each index one by one according to the project data of input
The summation divided is assessment total score；The involvement level of authorization project is determined using total score integration project grade；
Determine additional conditions：Additional conditions do not influence the assessment of involvement level typically, but will examine the important of plan as formulation
Foundation；The additional conditions of system record authorization project are considered as assessment；Additional conditions are referred to except project grade and intervention journey
Any situation that may influence authorization project beyond degree criterion；These situations are divided into can be quantified and can not quantify two kinds；System
Quantifiable additional conditions are used to as factor of influence to automatically generate examination plan, are then passed through without quantifiable additional conditions
The form of list, the reference information of examination plan is finally determined as user；Quantifiable additional conditions include：(1) machine is authorized
The workload of structure；By all authorization project information recorded in system database, this content is obtained automatically；(2) machine is authorized
The resource of structure；By the authorization resource information recorded in system database, this content is obtained automatically；
Step S2, generation examine plan step；
After assessing the involvement level of authorization project, examination plan is just automatically generated using generating algorithm by assessment result；Remove
Outside the timing node of examination activity, the content of examination plan includes：It is the Designated Engineering Representatives quantity of authorization project, chief or senior
Whether expert participates in, in-process review and the on the desk number of times for examining, whether merge inspection phase, the item number that the side of being investigated need to submit to
According to；
First, for these content items, according to involvement level it is low, in or it is high, it may be determined that a span substantially, and
Corresponding generating algorithm；Then, by generating algorithm using every score in " involvement level criterion " as parameter, incorporating parametric
Weight calculates the concrete outcome of each program content of the above automatically；
Under given involvement level, examine that each single item content in the works all correspond to an independent generating algorithm, generate
The parameter of algorithm includes that all or part of " involvement level criterion " must itemize, and all quantifies additional conditions；So, complete
Into after involvement level scoring work, system calculates every result, and accordingly generate building for examination plan automatically according to algorithm
View scheme；
Step S3, determination examine plan step；
After system automatically generates the proposed projects of examination plan, user checks and Editing plan；Examining plan editor circle
Face can list file names with all additional conditions that can not quantify defined in step sl as reference, user according to experience,
Modification adjustment again examines plan, and determines final version；
Step S4, generating algorithm autonomous learning step；
Automatically generated after formula is all editable examination plan proposed projects in user's modification adjustment, difference will be compared, according to
Difference comparison result adjusts itself algorithm weights factor, it is allowed to which device independently improves formula algorithm during continuing on, really
Protect result of calculation and more meet being actually needed for user；After adjustment examines plan, generation formula algorithm is improved, as project experiences
Accumulation data.
2. a kind of method that automatic formulation examines plan, it is characterised in that methods described includes：
Step S1, involvement level appraisal procedure；Assessment determines the involvement level of authorization mechanism；
Step S2, the plan step of examination generate rapid；
Step S3, the plan of examination determine step；
Step S4, generating algorithm autonomous learning step.
3. the method that automatic formulation according to claim 2 examines plan, it is characterised in that：
In step S1, involvement level refer in project checking process, determine authorization mechanism in checking process when, with which kind of
Degree, which field accordance is participated in examine；Need to carry out the assessment of involvement level and record in each authorization project initiation
As a result, to cause that authorization mechanism and research and development unit plan and assessment item details as soon as possible；Assessment result causes authorization
The involvement level of the high, medium and low Three Estate of mechanism, involvement level will be put into formulation examination plan consideration；Therefore it is being ranked
Before examining plan, the involvement level of authorization project need to be first assessed；The system is divided into three work by involvement level is assessed, respectively
For：Identify project grade, calculate every score and confirm additional conditions；
Identify project grade：The first foundation of system evaluation involvement level is the project grade of pending project；Project grade by
System is obtained automatically from defined " authorization project information data "；
Calculate every score：Except project grade, it is necessary to could full assessment intervention journey according to other " involvement level criterions "
Degree；Predefined each " involvement level criterion " corresponding scoring item in system database, its content includes：Evaluate accurate
Then, score range, Score index；System carries out automatic scoring, Ge Xiangping to each index one by one according to the project data of input
The summation divided is assessment total score；The involvement level of authorization project is determined using total score integration project grade；
Determine additional conditions：Additional conditions do not influence the assessment of involvement level typically, but will examine the important of plan as formulation
Foundation；The additional conditions of system record authorization project are considered as assessment；Additional conditions are referred to except project grade and intervention journey
Any situation that may influence authorization project beyond degree criterion；These situations are divided into can be quantified and can not quantify two kinds；System
Quantifiable additional conditions are used to as factor of influence to automatically generate examination plan, are then passed through without quantifiable additional conditions
The form of list, the reference information of examination plan is finally determined as user；Quantifiable additional conditions include：(1) machine is authorized
The workload of structure；By all authorization project information recorded in system database, this content is obtained automatically；(2) machine is authorized
The resource of structure；By the authorization resource information recorded in system database, this content is obtained automatically；
4. the method that automatic formulation according to claim 2 examines plan, it is characterised in that：
In step S2, after assessing the involvement level of authorization project, examination meter is automatically generated using generating algorithm by assessment result
Draw；Remove outside the timing node of examination activity, the content of examination plan includes：The Designated Engineering Representatives quantity of authorization project, head
Whether whether seat or Senior Expert participate in, in-process review and the on the desk number of times for examining, merge inspection phase, the side of being investigated and need submission
Project data；
First, for these content items, according to involvement level it is low, in or it is high, it may be determined that a span substantially, and
Corresponding generating algorithm；Then, by generating algorithm using every score in " involvement level criterion " as parameter, incorporating parametric
Weight calculates the concrete outcome of each program content of the above automatically；
Under given involvement level, examine that each single item content in the works all correspond to an independent generating algorithm, generate
The parameter of algorithm includes that all or part of " involvement level criterion " must itemize, and all quantifies additional conditions；So, complete
Into after involvement level scoring work, automatically according to algorithm, every result is calculated, and accordingly generate the suggestion side of examination plan
Case.
5. the method that automatic formulation according to claim 2 examines plan, it is characterised in that：
Step S3 is specifically included：
After system automatically generates the proposed projects of examination plan, user checks and Editing plan；Examining plan editor circle
Face can list file names with all additional conditions that can not quantify defined in step sl as reference, user according to experience,
Modification adjustment again examines plan, and determines final version.
6. the method that automatic formulation according to claim 2 examines plan, it is characterised in that：
In step S4, automatically generated after formula is all editable examination plan proposed projects in user's modification adjustment, will compared
Difference, itself algorithm weights factor is adjusted according to difference comparison result, it is allowed to which device is autonomous during continuing on to improve public affairs
Formula algorithm, it is ensured that result of calculation more meets being actually needed for user；After adjustment examines plan, generation formula algorithm is improved, made
For project experiences accumulate data.
7. the system that a kind of automatic formulation examines plan, it is characterised in that the system includes：
Involvement level evaluation module, is used to assess involvement level；
Plan generation module is examined, is used to generate examination plan；
Schedule determining module is examined, is used to determine examination plan；
Generating algorithm autonomous learning module, to generating algorithm autonomous learning.
8. the system that automatic formulation according to claim 7 examines plan, it is characterised in that：
The involvement level evaluation module is used to for assessment involvement level to be divided into three work, respectively：Identify project grade, meter
Calculate every score and confirm additional conditions；
Identify project grade：The first foundation of system evaluation involvement level is the project grade of pending project；Project grade by
System is obtained automatically from defined " authorization project information data "；
Calculate every score：Except project grade, it is necessary to could full assessment intervention journey according to other " involvement level criterions "
Degree；Predefined each " involvement level criterion " corresponding scoring item in system database, its content includes：Evaluate accurate
Then, score range, Score index；System carries out automatic scoring, Ge Xiangping to each index one by one according to the project data of input
The summation divided is assessment total score；The involvement level of authorization project is determined using total score integration project grade；
Determine additional conditions：Additional conditions do not influence the assessment of involvement level typically, but will examine the important of plan as formulation
Foundation；The additional conditions of system record authorization project are considered as assessment；Additional conditions are referred to except project grade and intervention journey
Any situation that may influence authorization project beyond degree criterion；These situations are divided into can be quantified and can not quantify two kinds；System
Quantifiable additional conditions are used to as factor of influence to automatically generate examination plan, are then passed through without quantifiable additional conditions
The form of list, the reference information of examination plan is finally determined as user；Quantifiable additional conditions include：(1) machine is authorized
The workload of structure；By all authorization project information recorded in system database, this content is obtained automatically；(2) machine is authorized
The resource of structure；By the authorization resource information recorded in system database, this content is obtained automatically.
9. the system that automatic formulation according to claim 7 examines plan, it is characterised in that：
After the examination plan generation module is used to assess the involvement level of authorization project, generating algorithm is utilized by assessment result
Automatically generate examination plan；Remove outside the timing node of examination activity, the content of examination plan includes：The appointment work of authorization project
Cheng represent quantity, chief or Senior Expert whether participate in, in-process review and the number of times for examining on the desk, whether merge inspection phase,
The project data that the side of being investigated need to submit to；
First, for these content items, according to involvement level it is low, in or it is high, it may be determined that a span substantially, and
Corresponding generating algorithm；Then, by generating algorithm using every score in " involvement level criterion " as parameter, incorporating parametric
Weight calculates the concrete outcome of each program content of the above automatically；
Under given involvement level, examine that each single item content in the works all correspond to an independent generating algorithm, generate
The parameter of algorithm includes that all or part of " involvement level criterion " must itemize, and all quantifies additional conditions；So, complete
Into after involvement level scoring work, automatically according to algorithm, every result is calculated, and accordingly generate the suggestion side of examination plan
Case.
10. the system that automatic formulation according to claim 7 examines plan, it is characterised in that：
The examination schedule determining module is used to after the proposed projects that system automatically generates examination plan, and user checks and edits
Examine plan；All defined additional conditions that can not quantify can be listed file names with as reference in examination plan editing interface, used
According to experience, modification adjustment again examines plan, and determines final version at family；
It is all that editable examination is counted that the generating algorithm autonomous learning module is used to automatically generate formula in user's modification adjustment
After drawing proposed projects, difference will be compared, itself algorithm weights factor is adjusted according to difference comparison result, it is allowed to which device constantly makes
Independently formula algorithm is improved during, it is ensured that result of calculation more meets being actually needed for user；It is complete after adjustment examines plan
Kind generation formula algorithm, data are accumulated as project experiences.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710051195.6A CN106934590A (en) | 2017-01-20 | 2017-01-20 | The automatic method and system for formulating the plan of examination |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710051195.6A CN106934590A (en) | 2017-01-20 | 2017-01-20 | The automatic method and system for formulating the plan of examination |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN106934590A true CN106934590A (en) | 2017-07-07 |
Family
ID=59423500
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710051195.6A Withdrawn CN106934590A (en) | 2017-01-20 | 2017-01-20 | The automatic method and system for formulating the plan of examination |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN106934590A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109592065A (en) * | 2018-11-05 | 2019-04-09 | 中国航空工业集团公司西安飞机设计研究所 | A kind of sealant material verification method suitable for seaworthiness authorization |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103049708A (en) * | 2012-12-27 | 2013-04-17 | 华为技术有限公司 | Audit configuration method and audit configuration system for database |
| CN106339850A (en) * | 2015-07-17 | 2017-01-18 | 北京奇虎科技有限公司 | Automatic generation method and device of contract approval process |
-
2017
- 2017-01-20 CN CN201710051195.6A patent/CN106934590A/en not_active Withdrawn
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103049708A (en) * | 2012-12-27 | 2013-04-17 | 华为技术有限公司 | Audit configuration method and audit configuration system for database |
| CN106339850A (en) * | 2015-07-17 | 2017-01-18 | 北京奇虎科技有限公司 | Automatic generation method and device of contract approval process |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 綦蕾: "【型号合格审定】航空发动机控制系统软件审查中的局方介入程度", 《微信公众号发动机审定中心》 * |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109592065A (en) * | 2018-11-05 | 2019-04-09 | 中国航空工业集团公司西安飞机设计研究所 | A kind of sealant material verification method suitable for seaworthiness authorization |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Barak et al. | A novel hybrid fuzzy DEA-Fuzzy MADM method for airlines safety evaluation | |
| CN106910007A (en) | The method and system of automatic distribution examination task | |
| US7788114B2 (en) | Method and article of manufacture for performing clinical trial budget analysis | |
| CN106779577A (en) | The method for building up and system of Auditing Information System system | |
| CN117196311A (en) | Railway engineering construction project risk management method | |
| CN108305011A (en) | A kind of space flight quality management system efficiency evaluation method that forward and reverse combines | |
| Safapour et al. | Investigation and analysis of human, organizational, and project based rework indicators in construction projects | |
| Li et al. | A validation research on fuzzy logic-AHP-based assessment method of operator’s situation awareness reliability | |
| Nelson et al. | Development of a leading performance indicator from operational experience and resilience in a nuclear power plant | |
| CN106934590A (en) | The automatic method and system for formulating the plan of examination | |
| Chindengwike et al. | The influence of approved budget on promoting outsourced revenue collection performance of local government Authorities in Developing Countries | |
| Juglaret et al. | Occupational Health and Safety Scorecards: New leading indicators improve risk management and regulatory compliance | |
| Liang et al. | Evaluation and prediction of on‐line maintenance workload in nuclear power plants | |
| Kjellén | Experience feedback | |
| Raffo et al. | Software process decision support: making process tradeoffs using a hybrid metrics, modeling and utility framework | |
| Alfian | The development framework of expert system application on indonesian governmental accounting system | |
| Xuejun et al. | A spacecraft launch organizational reliability model based on CSF | |
| Rohaeni et al. | Analysis of internal auditor position and functions in the company | |
| Popa | Techniques and Methods to Improve the Audit Process of the Distributed Informatics Systems Based on Metric System. | |
| Moore et al. | Quality assurance staffing impacts in military aircraft maintenance units | |
| Sanfaris et al. | Implementation in Profile Matching Techniques Avsec (Aviation Security) Career Development | |
| DePalmer | A Fuzzy Framework for the Air Force Mission Dependency Index | |
| Haney | Calculating Corporate Compliance & The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act | |
| Zheng et al. | Software quality evaluation based on improved RAD model and AHP | |
| Nayak et al. | Attitude of workers towards safety management system in rourkela steel plant |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| WW01 | Invention patent application withdrawn after publication | ||
| WW01 | Invention patent application withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20170707 |