CN106874998A - A kind of step matrix disassembling method certainly based on Pareto optimization - Google Patents
A kind of step matrix disassembling method certainly based on Pareto optimization Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106874998A CN106874998A CN201710022647.8A CN201710022647A CN106874998A CN 106874998 A CN106874998 A CN 106874998A CN 201710022647 A CN201710022647 A CN 201710022647A CN 106874998 A CN106874998 A CN 106874998A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- population
- gen
- matrix
- individual
- pareto optimization
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N3/00—Computing arrangements based on biological models
- G06N3/004—Artificial life, i.e. computing arrangements simulating life
- G06N3/006—Artificial life, i.e. computing arrangements simulating life based on simulated virtual individual or collective life forms, e.g. social simulations or particle swarm optimisation [PSO]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N3/00—Computing arrangements based on biological models
- G06N3/12—Computing arrangements based on biological models using genetic models
Abstract
The invention provides a kind of step matrix disassembling method certainly based on Pareto optimization, to determine that the weight of sample is changed into being obtained using Pareto optimization technology the weight of sample using the Learning Step of monotonic increase mode in the existing study from step, and sample weights are represented into scope [0 during Pareto optimization, 1] it is changed to [1, 1] difficult sample weights is there is rational distribution and then ensure diversity, finally selecting compromise best Knee points on optimum results PF faces can accelerate matrix decomposition process as matrix element weights, the present invention more rationally more meets cognitive science in a word.
Description
Technical field
The invention belongs to machine learning techniques field, and in particular to a kind of step matrix decomposition side certainly based on Pareto optimization
Method.
Background technology
In machine learning field, because the problem to be solved becomes increasingly complex, the optimization object function right and wrong of many tasks
Convex, this is easily ensnared into local best points in optimization process.It is inspired and often taken in learning process in humans and animals
First learn simple knowledge and then gradually learn the knowledge of hardly possible to reach learning objective, Y.Bengio, J.Louradour,
One kind is proposed in R.Collobert, and J.Weston is in document " Curriculum learning " (ICML, 2009) to be based on
The learning strategy course learning (CL) of machine learning, its core concept be exactly define a training sample by training difficulty gradually
Incremental " course ", the course for then allowing model training to define, experiment proves that CL is beneficial to accelerate convergence and obtains more preferable
Training result and more preferable model generalization.But in practical application, because amount of training data is big and difficulty is indefinite, artificially
Definition course is unreasonable and lacks the feedback of modelling effect during model training, in order to solve the above problems, M.Kumar,
B.Packer and D.Koller are in document " Self-paced learning for latent variable models "
One kind is proposed in (NIPS, pp.1189-1197,2010) " Self-paced learning (SPL) " can from step learning method
Oneself determine that the complexity of training sample is expressed as sample weights during model training with by learner, by a step-length
Parameter is incremented by gradually to increase the number of samples and its difficulty of model training, and from step learning method, iteratively more new samples are weighed
Gradually be added to sample from the easier to the more advanced in model training and then model parameter is updated by weight, and its other party is surpassed in many applications
Method.
Matrix decomposition underlying issue and is widely used in machine learning and computation vision, it is intended to decompose m × n's
Data matrix Y is two less matrix U ∈ Rm×r,V∈Rn×r(r < < min (m, n)) causes UVT≈ Y, can be by solving
Optimization problem is realized:Wherein Ω is the index of non-missing data, l () table
Show loss function, R (U, V) is regular terms, conventional loss function is as follows with regular terms:
With
But due to the nonconvex property of above-mentioned optimization problem, traditional matrix disassembling method is easily trapped into bad local minimum
Especially in the case where there is abnormal data and missing data, in order to solve the above problems, Q.Zhao, D.Y.Meng,
L.Jiang, Q.Xie, Z.B.Xu and A.Hauptman are in document " Self-paced learning for matrix
Matrix decomposition will be applied to from step study in factorization " (AAAI, 2015) to propose from step matrix disassembling method, with reference to
New optimization problem is obtained from step learning strategy and matrix decomposition target:
Wherein wijThe weight (penalty values are bigger, and explanation is more difficult, and weight will be smaller) of representing matrix element, f (wij,k)
It is that k is the step parameter of monotonic increase from step function.Experiment is proved can be from noisy data effectively from step matrix disassembling method
Approach truth value matrix.
Although can effectively mitigate local minimum problem from step matrix disassembling method, many problems are still present
Unreasonable part, it is not meet to recognize to control the difficulty of matrix element using a step parameter for monotonic increase from step study first
Can science, the knowledge quantity and difficulty that people's next step in the cognitive process to be learnt be according to previous study situation depending on;Its
The complexity of matrix element represents that distribution is unreasonable in the secondary study from step, i.e. the scope of weight is [0,1], wherein difficult
Matrix element be 0 without degree of difficulty distribution.
And Pareto optimization is a kind of Multipurpose Optimal Method without formulating decision rule, have wide range of applications, it is different
In general single object optimization, Pareto optimization is intended to find the compromise and Pareto having had to all targets and arranges other solutions
Pareto optimality disaggregation and Pareto leading surface, Knee points are exactly the optimal turning point of Pareto leading surface, are had to different target
Best is compromise.In addition Pareto optimization has many successful Applications, such as C.Qian, and Y.Yu and Z.-H.Zhou are in document
Subset is carried out using Pareto optimization in " Subset selection by pareto optimization " (NIPS, 2015)
Select and in document " Pareto ensemble pruning " (AAAI, pp.2935-2941,2015) by Pareto application
In integrated pruning.
The content of the invention
The purpose of the present invention is to overcome the problem for existing from step study from step matrix disassembling method in the prior art, effectively
Mitigate matrix decomposition bad local minimum problem is absorbed in due to non convex objective function, especially in the presence of abnormal data and lack
In the case of losing data.
To achieve these goals, the invention provides a kind of step matrix disassembling method certainly based on Pareto optimization, bag
Include following steps:
Step 1) input matrix Y ∈ R to be decomposedm×n, Population Size NpAnd step information, do not lack in the matrix Y to be decomposed
The matrix index collection for losing data is combined into Ω, and the step information includes initial step length k0With step size increments μ;
Step 2) decompose matrix Y to be decomposed and obtain initial matrix U0,V0, calculating matrix element loss value, then according to weight
Method of salary distribution f (wij;K) it is N with randomized generation Population SizepInitial weight population P0And calculate corresponding to population at individual
Two target function values, nowAnd iteration ends number of times G is setmax, its
In, U0∈Rm×r,V0∈Rr×n, r < < min (m, n), k represents step-length, by initial step length k0Increase μ successively to obtain, wijRepresent square
The weight of the i-th row jth column element of battle array,S-th population at individual is represented,RepresentCorresponding two
Target function value, s={ 1 ..., Np};
Step 3) to P0Carry out non-dominated ranking operation;
Step 4) iterations gen=0 is set, make Pgen=P0Represent the gen times population of iteration;
Step 5) to population Pgen`Perform selection operation and select Np/ 2 parent individualities constitute parent sub-group;
Step 6) parent sub-group is carried out cross and variation genetic manipulation generation Population Size be NpProgeny population Qgen;
Step 7) combination population PgenWith progeny population QgenFor scale is 2NpPopulation Rgen:Rgen=Pgen∪Qgen;
Step 8) to population RgenPerform selection operation and select NpIndividual population at individual constitutes a new generation colony Pgen+1:
Step 9) judge iterations gen whether less than termination iterations GmaxIf being less than Gmax, iterations adds 1, returns
To step 5) start a new round circulation, otherwise stop circulation, obtain population PF faces, find out the Knee points on PF facesI.e. one group element weights, wherein the value by weight less than 0 is entered as 0 again;
Step 10) by Optimization SolutionObtain last split-matrix
U,V。
The wijThe weight of ∈ [- 1,1] representing matrix the i-th row jth column element,
Two target function value computing formula corresponding to the calculating population at individual are as follows:
Step 3) in P0Carry out non-dominated ranking operation detailed process as follows:Population at individual allocation level is given, and is calculated
The crowding distance of each population at individual, now
Wherein ranks, dissThe grade and crowding distance of s-th individuality of population are represented respectively.
Step 5) to population Pgen`Perform selection operation and select Np/ 2 parent individualities constitute the specific method of parent sub-group
It is as follows:Two population at individual are selected at random compares their grade and crowding distance, the individual reservation of lower grade, if grade phase
Same then crowding distance individual reservation high, until selecting Np/ 2 individual composition populations of parent;
Step 8) to population RgenPerform selection operation and select NpIndividual population at individual composition population P of new generationgen+1Specific side
Method is as follows:The low population at individual of non-dominant grade to population P of new generation is selected successivelygen+1In, when selected same grade
Number of individuals is more than NpWhen, then crowding distance individuality high to population P of new generation is selected successivelygen+1In, final composition scale is Np
Population P of new generationgen+1。
The beneficial effects of the invention are as follows:
1st, the step matrix disassembling method certainly based on Pareto optimization that the present invention is provided, will be weighed using Pareto optimization element
Weight population, it is no longer necessary to which the step parameter of monotonic increase determines element weights, and Pareto optimization can be with adjust automatically object function
Solution path get the solution for making object function optimal, in addition the genetic manipulation during Pareto optimization can make from step learn
The autonomous regularized learning algorithm paces of habit process;
2nd, it is the larger rational weight distribution of Elemental partition of loss that sample weights scope is changed to [- 1,1] by this method
Scope, is beneficial to simple sample and complex samples and more abundant sample weights is generated during Pareto optimization, finally from
Can select and object function is rolled over as the matrix element weights for solving optimization problem from Knee solutions in Pareto optimization result
The best weight of inner feelings, more conforms to cognitive science based on Pareto optimization from step matrix disassembling method in a word.
It is described in further details below in conjunction with accompanying drawing.
Brief description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is flow chart of the invention;
Fig. 2 is population P0Schematic diagram;
Fig. 3 is Pareto leading surface schematic diagram;
Fig. 4 is target function value f1;
Fig. 5 is target function value f2;
Fig. 6 is matrix decomposition experimental result.
Specific embodiment
Embodiment 1:
Present embodiments provide it is a kind of it is as shown in Figure 1 based on Pareto optimization from step matrix disassembling method, including with
Lower step:
Step 1) input matrix Y ∈ R to be decomposedm×n, Population Size NpAnd step information, do not lack in the matrix Y to be decomposed
The matrix index collection for losing data is combined into Ω, and the step information includes initial step length k0With step size increments μ;
Step 2) decompose matrix Y to be decomposed and obtain initial matrix U0,V0, calculating matrix element loss value, then according to weight
Method of salary distribution f (wij;K) it is N with randomized generation Population SizepInitial weight population P0And calculate corresponding to population at individual
Two target function values, nowAnd iteration ends number of times G is setmax, its
In, U0∈Rm×r,V0∈Rr×n, r < < min (m, n), k represents step-length, by initial step length k0Increase μ successively to obtain, wijRepresent square
The weight of the i-th row jth column element of battle array,S-th population at individual is represented,RepresentCorresponding two
Target function value, s={ 1 ..., Np};
Step 3) to P0Carry out non-dominated ranking operation;
Step 4) iterations gen=0 is set, make Pgen=P0Represent the gen times population of iteration;
Step 5) to population Pgen`Perform selection operation and select Np/ 2 parent individualities constitute parent sub-group;
Step 6) parent sub-group is carried out cross and variation genetic manipulation generation Population Size be NpProgeny population Qgen;
Step 7) combination population PgenWith progeny population QgenFor scale is 2NpPopulation Rgen:Rgen=Pgen∪Qgen;
Step 8) to population RgenPerform selection operation and select NpIndividual population at individual constitutes a new generation colony Pgen+1:
Step 9) judge iterations gen whether less than termination iterations GmaxIf being less than Gmax, iterations adds 1, returns
To step 5) start a new round circulation, otherwise stop circulation, obtain population PF faces, find out the Knee points on PF facesI.e. one group element weights, wherein the value by weight less than 0 is entered as 0 again;
Step 10) by Optimization SolutionObtain last split-matrix
U,V。
The step matrix disassembling method certainly based on Pareto optimization that the present invention is provided, will be using Pareto optimization element weights
Population, it is no longer necessary to which the step parameter of monotonic increase determines element weights, Pareto optimization can be with adjust automatically object function
Solution path gets the solution for making object function optimal, and the genetic manipulation during Pareto optimization can make to learn from step in addition
The autonomous regularized learning algorithm paces of process.
Embodiment 2:
On the basis of embodiment 1, a kind of step matrix disassembling method certainly based on Pareto optimization is present embodiments provided,
Comprise the following steps:
Step 1) input matrix Y, Population Size NpAnd step information:
The element Y of random generator matrix YijGaussian distributed N (0,1), then wherein 40% elects missing data, 20% as
Data are added in Gaussian noise~N (0,0.01) disturbances that uniformly distributed noise disturbance and 20% data are added on [- 20,20];
Step information includes initial step length k and step size increments μ;
Step 2) decompose Y obtain initial matrix U0,V0, counting loss simultaneously generates initial weight population P0And iteration end is set
Only number of times Gmax:Population P0Illustrate map Fig. 2;
Initial matrix U is obtained using traditional matrix disassembling method0,V0, by matrix U0,V0Substitute into loss function formula (LS
Or LAD loss functions) calculating elements penalty values, then according to element loss value and initial step length k generation element weightsAs
Population at individual, repeatedly makes step-length increase the population at individual of μ generations 30%, the population at individual composition rule of random generation remaining 70%
Mould is NpInitial population P0And calculate the addition population next two columns of the target function value corresponding to individuality:Fig. 4 and Fig. 5 are respectively mesh
Offer of tender numerical value f1、f2;
At this momentWhereinRepresent s-th kind
Group is individual,RepresentTwo corresponding target function values, s={ 1 ..., Np}
Step 3) to population P0Carry out non-dominated ranking operation:
If the fitness of an individual is below another individual fitness value shows that the individuality arranges another individuality, compare successively
Fitness value compared with population at individual gives individual distribution non-dominant grade (individuality of lower grade explanation domination is more), and suitable according to individuality
Angle value is answered to calculate the crowding distance of each population at individual, now population:
Wherein ranks,dissThe grade and crowding distance of s-th individuality of population are represented respectively;
Step 4) set iterations gen=1 make Pgen=P0Represent the gen times population of iteration;
Step 5) to population PgenPerform selection operation and select parent sub-group:
Two population at individual are selected at random compares their grade and crowding distance, the individual reservation of lower grade, if waiting
The identical then crowding distance of level individual reservation high, until selecting Np/ 2 individual composition populations of parent;
Step 6) parent sub-group is carried out cross and variation genetic manipulation generation scale be NpProgeny population Qgen:
Cross and variation probability, index are set, and random selection parent individuality is simulated binary system and intersects and multinomial variation
Generation new individual composition progeny population Qgen;
Step 7) combination population PgenWith progeny population QgenFor scale is 2NpPopulation Rgen:
Directly merge contemporary population PgenWith progeny population QgenComposition population Rgen:Rgen=Pgen∪Qgen;
Step 8) to population RgenPerform selection operation and select colony P of new generationgen+1;
The low population at individual of non-dominant grade to population P of new generation is selected successivelygen+1In, when selected same grade
Number of individuals is more than NpWhen, then crowding distance individuality high to population P of new generation is selected successivelygen+1In, final composition scale is Np
Population P of new generationgen+1;
Step 9) judge iterations gen whether less than termination iterations GmaxIf being less than Gmax, then gen=gen+1,
Return to step 5) start new circulation, otherwise stop circulation, the PF faces of population are obtained, find out the Knee points on PF facesI.e. one group sample weights, wherein the value by weight less than 0 is entered as 0:
The Knee points of leading surface are distributed using the Pareto for selecting based on Angle Method or other method population, by what is selected
Sample weights carry out again sample of the assignment only from weight more than 0 and carry out the renewal of next step model parameter, and weight is less than into 0
Value be entered as 0;Fig. 3 is Pareto leading surface schematic diagram;
Step 10) by optimization object functionObtain final output
Matrix U, V.Fig. 6 is matrix decomposition experimental result.
It is the larger rational weight distribution model of Elemental partition of loss that sample weights scope is changed to [- 1,1] by this method
Enclose, be beneficial to simple sample and complex samples and more abundant sample weights are generated during Pareto optimization, finally from handkerchief
Can be selected compromise to object function as the matrix element weights for solving optimization problem from Knee solutions in tired support optimum results
Best weight, more conforms to cognitive science based on Pareto optimization from step matrix disassembling method in a word.
The method and structure that various embodiments above is not described in detail belongs to the common knowledge of the industry, does not chat one by one here
State.
It is exemplified as above be only to of the invention for example, do not constitute the limitation to protection scope of the present invention, it is all
It is that design same or analogous with the present invention is belonged within protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (6)
- It is 1. a kind of that matrix disassembling method is walked based on Pareto optimization certainly, it is characterised in that:Comprise the following steps:Step 1) input matrix Y ∈ R to be decomposedm×n, Population Size NpAnd step information, non-missing number in the matrix Y to be decomposed According to matrix index collection be combined into Ω, the step information includes initial step length k0With step size increments μ;Step 2) decompose matrix Y to be decomposed and obtain initial matrix U0,V0, calculating matrix element loss value, then according to weight distribution Mode f (wij;K) it is N with randomized generation Population SizepInitial weight population P0And calculate two corresponding to population at individual Target function value, nowAnd iteration ends number of times G is setmax, wherein, U0∈ Rm×r,V0∈Rr×n, r < < min (m, n), k represents step-length, by initial step length k0Increase μ successively to obtain, wijThe row of representing matrix i-th The weight of jth column element,Represent s-th population at individual, f1 s,RepresentTwo corresponding target letters Numerical value, s={ 1 ..., Np};Step 3) to P0Carry out non-dominated ranking operation;Step 4) iterations gen=0 is set, make Pgen=P0Represent the gen times population of iteration;Step 5) to population Pgen`Perform selection operation and select Np/ 2 parent individualities constitute parent sub-group;Step 6) parent sub-group is carried out cross and variation genetic manipulation generation Population Size be NpProgeny population Qgen;Step 7) combination population PgenWith progeny population QgenFor scale is 2NpPopulation Rgen:Rgen=Pgen∪Qgen;Step 8) to population RgenPerform selection operation and select NpIndividual population at individual constitutes a new generation colony Pgen+1:Step 9) judge iterations gen whether less than termination iterations GmaxIf being less than Gmax, iterations adds 1, returns to step The rapid circulation for 5) starting a new round, otherwise stops circulation, obtains the PF faces of population, finds out the Knee points on PF facesI.e. one group element weights, wherein the value by weight less than 0 is entered as 0 again;Step 10) by Optimization SolutionObtain last split-matrix U, V.
- 2. it is according to claim 1 it is a kind of based on Pareto optimization from step matrix disassembling method, it is characterised in that:It is described wijThe weight of ∈ [- 1,1] representing matrix the i-th row jth column element,
- 3. it is according to claim 1 it is a kind of based on Pareto optimization from step matrix disassembling method, it is characterised in that:It is described The two target function value computing formula calculated corresponding to population at individual are as follows:
- 4. it is according to claim 1 it is a kind of based on Pareto optimization from step matrix disassembling method, it is characterised in that step 3) to P in0Carry out non-dominated ranking operation detailed process as follows:Population at individual allocation level is given, and calculates each population at individual Crowding distance, nowWherein ranks, diss The grade and crowding distance of s-th individuality of population are represented respectively.
- 5. it is according to claim 1 it is a kind of based on Pareto optimization from step matrix disassembling method, it is characterised in that step 5) to population Pgen`Perform selection operation and select NpThe specific method of/2 parent individuality composition parent sub-groups is as follows:Random choosing Go out two population at individual and compare their grade and crowding distance, the individual reservation of lower grade, if grade is identical it is crowded away from Retain from individuality high, until selecting Np/ 2 individual composition populations of parent.
- 6. it is according to claim 1 it is a kind of based on Pareto optimization from step matrix disassembling method, it is characterised in that step 8) to population RgenPerform selection operation and select NpIndividual population at individual composition population P of new generationgen+1Specific method it is as follows:Successively Select the low population at individual of non-dominant grade to population P of new generationgen+1In, when the number of individuals of selected same grade is more than Np When, then crowding distance individuality high to population P of new generation is selected successivelygen+1In, final composition scale is NpPopulation of new generation Pgen+1。
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710022647.8A CN106874998A (en) | 2017-01-12 | 2017-01-12 | A kind of step matrix disassembling method certainly based on Pareto optimization |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710022647.8A CN106874998A (en) | 2017-01-12 | 2017-01-12 | A kind of step matrix disassembling method certainly based on Pareto optimization |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN106874998A true CN106874998A (en) | 2017-06-20 |
Family
ID=59158479
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710022647.8A Pending CN106874998A (en) | 2017-01-12 | 2017-01-12 | A kind of step matrix disassembling method certainly based on Pareto optimization |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN106874998A (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN109783769A (en) * | 2017-11-15 | 2019-05-21 | 中国移动通信集团上海有限公司 | A kind of matrix disassembling method and device based on user items scoring |
US11429884B1 (en) * | 2020-05-19 | 2022-08-30 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Non-textual topic modeling |
-
2017
- 2017-01-12 CN CN201710022647.8A patent/CN106874998A/en active Pending
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN109783769A (en) * | 2017-11-15 | 2019-05-21 | 中国移动通信集团上海有限公司 | A kind of matrix disassembling method and device based on user items scoring |
CN109783769B (en) * | 2017-11-15 | 2023-02-28 | 中国移动通信集团上海有限公司 | Matrix decomposition method and device based on user project scoring |
US11429884B1 (en) * | 2020-05-19 | 2022-08-30 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Non-textual topic modeling |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Lobato et al. | Multi-objective genetic algorithm for missing data imputation | |
Wang et al. | A hybridization of teaching–learning-based optimization and differential evolution for chaotic time series prediction | |
Chen et al. | Multiobjective tracking control design of T–S fuzzy systems: Fuzzy Pareto optimal approach | |
CN113190688B (en) | Complex network link prediction method and system based on logical reasoning and graph convolution | |
Dhahri et al. | Hierarchical multi-dimensional differential evolution for the design of beta basis function neural network | |
CN104636801A (en) | Transmission line audible noise prediction method based on BP neural network optimization | |
CN106650920A (en) | Prediction model based on optimized extreme learning machine (ELM) | |
CN103116324B (en) | Micro-electronics production line scheduling method based on index prediction and online learning | |
Cao et al. | Anti-synchronization of delayed memristive neural networks with leakage term and reaction–diffusion terms | |
Li | Neural network models for intelligent support of mark‐up estimation | |
Ayad et al. | Parametric analysis for genetic algorithms handling parameters | |
Whigham et al. | Predicting chlorophyll-a in freshwater lakes by hybridising process-based models and genetic algorithms | |
CN106874998A (en) | A kind of step matrix disassembling method certainly based on Pareto optimization | |
CN106227767A (en) | A kind of based on the adaptive collaborative filtering method of field dependency | |
CN102930341B (en) | Optimal training method of collaborative filtering recommendation model | |
Bouaziz et al. | Evolving flexible beta basis function neural tree for nonlinear systems | |
MirRokni | Applying genetic algorithm in architecture and neural network training | |
CN109408896B (en) | Multi-element intelligent real-time monitoring method for anaerobic sewage treatment gas production | |
Van Kien et al. | Cascade training multilayer fuzzy model for nonlinear uncertain system identification optimized by differential evolution algorithm | |
Bouaziz et al. | Extended immune programming and opposite-based PSO for evolving flexible beta basis function neural tree | |
Elomda et al. | Fuzzy cognitive map with linguistic values | |
Tu et al. | Multitarget prediction—A new approach using sphere complex fuzzy sets | |
Dhahri et al. | Opposition-based differential evolution for beta basis function neural network | |
Jian et al. | Learning from Simulated World-Surrogates Construction with Deep Neural Network. | |
Buchholz et al. | Clifford algebra multilayer perceptrons |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20170620 |