CN106815471B - A kind of special vehicle information system efficiency estimation method - Google Patents
A kind of special vehicle information system efficiency estimation method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106815471B CN106815471B CN201611237275.2A CN201611237275A CN106815471B CN 106815471 B CN106815471 B CN 106815471B CN 201611237275 A CN201611237275 A CN 201611237275A CN 106815471 B CN106815471 B CN 106815471B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- ability
- evaluation
- capability
- weight
- information system
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16Z—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G16Z99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other main groups of this subclass
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention belongs to special vehicle information systems technology fields, and in particular to a kind of special vehicle information system efficiency estimation method.This method proposes specific appraisal procedure in terms of the opening of information system, cooperative ability, platform capabilities three, can science, comprehensively the function of information system, performance etc. are assessed.This method can comprehensively consider the factors such as Weight of Expert, index weights and qualitative index and quantitative target, assess the comprehensive effectiveness of information system.
Description
Technical field
The invention belongs to special vehicle information systems technology fields, and in particular to a kind of special vehicle information system efficiency is commented
Estimate method.
Background technique
Information system is the core component of special vehicle, its theoretical, information theory and advanced electricity with special vehicle
Based on sub- technology, each mission profile function is realized towards special vehicle and improves general operation effectiveness, using system engineering side
Method by battle field information, special vehicle platform information, the acquisition for multiplying the various informations such as load person's manipulation, transmission, processing, storage, is shown
Functions and the corresponding electronic equipment such as show, control, by the Integration ofTechnologies such as vehicle bus/network and software be a distribution,
Open organic whole is both that a part of special vehicle master-plan and vehicle other each subsystems provide information biography
The generic services such as defeated, processing, storage, aobvious control, to achieve the purpose that system resource shared resources and overall efficiency greatly improve.
As special vehicle combat mode is changed from " platform centric warfare " to " network-centric warfare ", special vehicle is made in joint
Undertaking under war system for task is more and more, becomes increasingly complex, and information system is the key that vehicle completes complicated cotasking.It is special
Kind of Vehicle Information System is that a collection video, audio, image, text, the processing of control information much information are answered with switching requirement
Miscellaneous system.As vehicle task and function are more and more, electronic device types and quantity largely increase, to the volume, again of platform
Amount, cost, length of cable, crew module's man-machine environment etc. all bring large effect.
With the development of science and technology, the hardware and software platform of special vehicle information system, synthesization, modularization level be increasingly
Height, each military power are proposed advanced information system architectural framework, such as the open electron system structure of the VICTORY of U.S. army
The GVA structure (General Vehicle Architecture: general-purpose vehicle architecture) standardized with U.K. Ministry of Defence.China
After decades of development, certain progress is also achieved in terms of special vehicle information system integratedization.
But at home in the technology development process of special vehicle information system, all lack always a set of
Effective synthetic effectiveness evaluation method, can not function, performance etc. to various special vehicle information system carry out objective appraisal,
It can only judge by the experience of expert.The high speed development of China's special vehicle information system is hindered to a certain extent.
Summary of the invention
(1) technical problems to be solved
The technical problem to be solved by the present invention is how to propose a kind of special vehicle information system efficiency estimation method, energy
Enough relatively comprehensively, objectively the function to special vehicle information system and performance carry out scientific evaluation, are evaluation information system
Efficiency provides foundation.
(2) technical solution
In order to solve the above technical problems, the present invention provides a kind of special vehicle information system efficiency estimation method, this method
In, for the design scheme of special vehicle information system, system effectiveness is defined as:
S=f { A, B, C }=α1·A+α2·B+α3·C
Wherein, A refers to opening, and B refers to that cooperative ability, C refer to platform capabilities, and system effectiveness S passes through to systemic openness, collaboration
It is assessed and is obtained in terms of ability and platform capabilities three, α1、α2And α3Respectively opening A, cooperative ability B, platform capabilities C
Weight, in evaluation procedure, according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP) determine, α1+α2+α3=1；
(1) the open A appraisal procedure of information system
The open A of information system is defined as:
Wherein, A1For reconfigurable property, A2For scalability, A3For supportability, A4For standardization, pass through this four
Aspect evaluates the open A of information system, βA1、βA2、βA4、βA4Respectively reconfigurable property A1, scalability A2、
Supportability A3And standardized A4Weight when evaluating opening A, βA1+βA2+βA3+βA4=1；
Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
(a) reconfigurable property A1Appraisal procedure
The reconfigurable property A of information system1Is defined as:
Wherein, A11For adaptability, A12For interchangeability, by the two aspects to the reconfigurable property A of information system1Into
Row evaluation, γA11、γA12Respectively adaptability A11With interchangeability A12Evaluating reconfigurable property A1When weight, γA11+
γA12=1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
Adaptability A11Refer to the ability with another one system unit of part replacement with identity function, performance, mutually
Transsexual A12Refer to the ability of the interchange system component between different type platform；Adaptability A11With interchangeability A12Using level point
The evaluation method of analysis method or Fuzzy Evaluation Method can also be used 5 points of systems and carry out quantitative assessment；
(b) scalability A2Appraisal procedure
The scalability A of information system2Is defined as:
Wherein, A21For longitudinal scalability, A22For horizontal scalability, A23For surplus, A24For modularization, by this four
Scalability A of a aspect to information system2It is evaluated, γA21、γA22、γA23、γA24Respectively longitudinal scalability A21、
Horizontal scalability A22, surplus A23With modularization A24In evaluation scalability A2When weight, γA21+γA22+γA23+γA24
=1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
Longitudinal scalability A21Refer to the ability for increasing system resource；Horizontal scalability A22Refer to increase or decrease and is
The ability of system component or software；Surplus A23Refer to the spare surplus of system；Longitudinal scalability A21, horizontal scalability A22, it is remaining
Measure A23With modularization A24Using the evaluation method of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or Fuzzy Evaluation Method, quantitative assessment also is carried out using 5 points of systems；
(c) supportability A3Appraisal procedure
The supportability A of information system3It may be defined as:
Wherein, A31For built-in test ability, A32For with higher level's Maintenance Support System interconnection capability, pass through the two aspect
It can supportability A to information system3It is evaluated, γA31、γA32Respectively built-in test ability A31It is protected with being repaired with higher level
Barrier system interconnection capability A32In evaluation supportability A3When weight, γA31+γA32=1；Weight is in evaluation procedure, according to layer
Fractional analysis determines；
Built-in test ability A31With with higher level's Maintenance Support System interconnection capability A32, using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or fuzzy comment
The evaluation method of valence method also carries out quantitative assessment using 5 points of systems；
(d) standardized A4Appraisal procedure
The standardized A of information system4It may be defined as:
Wherein, A41For selection standard and technology, A42For electric interfaces, A43It, can be right by these three aspects for information interface
The standardized A of information system4It is evaluated, γA41、γA42、γA43Respectively selection standard and technology A41, electric interfaces A42With
Information interface A43In evaluation criterion A4When weight, γA41+γA42+γA43=1；Weight is in evaluation procedure, according to level point
Analysis method determines；
Selection standard and technology A41, electric interfaces A42With information interface A43, using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or Fuzzy Evaluation Method
Evaluation method can also be used 5 points of systems and carry out quantitative assessment；
(2) the cooperative ability B appraisal procedure of information system
The cooperative ability B of information system may be defined as:
Wherein, B1Ability, B are managed for task2For the ability of interconnecting, B3For communication capacity, by these three aspects to letter
The cooperative ability B of breath system is evaluated, βB1、βB2、βB3Respectively task manages ability B1, the ability that interconnects B2With communication energy
Power B3Weight when evaluating cooperative ability B, βB1+βB2+βB3=1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
(a) task manages ability B1Appraisal procedure
The task of information system manages ability B1It may be defined as:
Wherein, B11For mission planning ability, B12To assist decision-making capability, B13For information fusion faculty, B14For voice commander
Ability, B15For data command ability, B16For interoperability, B17For multisensor-multitarget tracking ability, B18For more weapon managerial abilities,
Ability B is managed by task of this eight aspects to information system1It is evaluated, γB11、γB12、γB13、γB14、γB15、
γB16、γB17、γB18Respectively mission planning ability B11, aid decision ability B12, information fusion faculty B13, voice command energy
Power B14, data command ability B15, interoperability B16, multisensor-multitarget tracking ability B17With more weapon managerial ability B18Appoint in evaluation
Be engaged in control ability B1When weight, γB11+γB12+γB13+γB14+γB15+γB16+γB17+γB18=1；Weight was being evaluated
Cheng Zhong is determined according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
For mission planning ability B11, aid decision ability B12, information fusion faculty B13, voice command ability B14, data
Command ability B15, interoperability B16, multisensor-multitarget tracking ability B17With more weapon managerial ability B18, using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or
The evaluation method of Fuzzy Evaluation Method can also be used 5 points of systems and carry out quantitative assessment；
(b) ability that interconnects B2Appraisal procedure
The ability B that interconnects of information system2It may be defined as:
Wherein, B21To interconnect ability with vehicle, B22To interconnect ability with infantry, B23For with armed helicopter
Interconnect ability, B24To interconnect ability with fighter plane, B25To interconnect ability with unmanned plane, B26It is mutual with naval vessel
Join interoperability, B27To interconnect ability with cannon, by this seven aspects to the ability B that interconnects of information system2Into
Row evaluation, γB21、γB22、γB23、γB24、γB25、γB26、γB27Respectively interconnect with vehicle ability B21, it is mutual with infantry
Join interoperability B22, interconnect ability B with armed helicopter23, interconnect ability B with fighter plane24And unmanned plane interconnects
Interoperability B25And interconnect ability B on naval vessel26It interconnects ability B with cannon27It interconnects ability B in evaluation2When
Weight, γB21+γB22+γB23+γB24+γB25+γB26+γB27=1；Weight is in evaluation procedure, according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
It determines；
For interconnecting ability B with vehicle21, interconnect ability B with infantry22, interconnect energy with armed helicopter
Power B23, interconnect ability B with fighter plane24, interconnect ability B with unmanned plane25And interconnect ability B on naval vessel26With with
Cannon interconnects ability B27, using the evaluation methods of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or Fuzzy Evaluation Method, 5 points of systems can also be used and quantified
Evaluation；
(c) communication capacity B3Appraisal procedure
The communication capacity B of information system3It may be defined as:
Wherein, B31For dynamic group net ability, B32For communication bandwidth, B33For traffic rate, B34For communication distance, B35It is anti-
Interference performance, B36For redundant ability, by this six aspects to the communication capacity B of information system3It is evaluated, γB31、γB32、
γB33、γB34、γB35、γB36Respectively dynamic group net ability B31, communication bandwidth B32, traffic rate B33, communication distance B34, it is anti-
Interference performance B35With redundant ability B36In evaluation communication capacity B3When weight, γB31+γB32+γB33+γB34+γB35+γB36
=1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
For dynamic group net ability B31, anti-interference ability B35, redundant ability B36, using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or fuzzy evaluation
The evaluation method of method can also be used 5 points of systems and carry out quantitative assessment；For communication bandwidth B32, traffic rate B33And communication distance
B34, using 1 change method is returned, numerical value conversion is assessed for unified dimension；
(3) the platform capabilities C appraisal procedure of information system
The platform capabilities C of information system is defined as:
Wherein, C1For overall performance, C2For information Perception ability, C3For message transmission capability, C4For information processing capability, C5
For information storage capability, C6For interactive capability, the platform capabilities C of information system is evaluated by this six aspects,
βC1、βC2、βC3、βC4、βC5、βC6Respectively overall performance C1, information Perception ability C2, message transmission capability C3, information processing capability
C4, information storage capability C5With interactive capability C6Weight in evaluation platform ability C, βC1+βC2+βC3+βC4+βC5+βC6=
1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
(a) overall performance C1Appraisal procedure
The overall performance C of information system1Is defined as:
Wherein, C11For task integration capability, C12For function synthesized ability, C13For security of system, C14It is reliable for system
Property, C15For processor type, C16For type of operating system, C17For software development environment type, C18For programming language type, lead to
This eight aspects are crossed to the overall performance C of information system1It is evaluated, γC11、γC12、γC13、γC14、γC15、γC16、
γC17、γC18Respectively task integration capability C11, function synthesized ability C12, security of system C13, system reliability C14, processing
Device type C15, type of operating system C16, software development environment type C17With programming language type C18In evaluation overall performance C1When
Weight, γC11+γC12+γC13+γC14+γC15+γC16+γC17+γC18=1；Weight is in evaluation procedure, according to level point
Analysis method determines；
For task integration capability C11, function synthesized ability C12, security of system C13With system reliability C14, using layer
The evaluation method of fractional analysis or Fuzzy Evaluation Method can also be used 5 points of systems and carry out quantitative assessment；For processor type C15, behaviour
Make system type C16, software development environment type C17With programming language type C18, counted the statistics knot for obtaining different schemes
After fruit, using 1 change method is returned, numerical value conversion is assessed for unified dimension；
(b) information Perception ability C2Appraisal procedure
The information Perception ability C of information system2Is defined as:
Wherein, C21For target detection ability, C22For targeting capability, C23For target traceability, C24For road conditions perception
Ability, C25For vehicle condition sensing capability, by this five aspects to the information Perception ability C of information system2It is evaluated, γC21、
γC22、γC23、γC24、γC25Respectively target detection ability C21, targeting capability C22, target traceability C23, road conditions sense
Know ability C24With vehicle condition sensing capability C25In evaluation information sensing capability C2When weight, γC21+γC22+γC23+γC24+γC25
=1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
For target detection ability C21, targeting capability C22, target traceability C23, road conditions sensing capability C24And vehicle
Condition sensing capability C25, using the evaluation methods of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or Fuzzy Evaluation Method, 5 points of systems can also be used and carry out quantitative assessment；
(c) message transmission capability C3Appraisal procedure
The message transmission capability C of information system3Is defined as:
Wherein, C31For transmission rate, C32For delay, C33For redundant ability, by these three aspects to the letter of information system
Cease transmittability C3It is evaluated, γC31、γC32、γC33Respectively transmission rate C31, delay C32With redundant ability C33It is evaluating
Message transmission capability C3When weight, γC31+γC32+γC33=1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
For transmission rate C31With delay C32, carry out after test analysis obtains the result of different schemes, using returning 1 change side
Method assesses numerical value conversion for unified dimension；For redundant ability C33, using commenting for analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or Fuzzy Evaluation Method
Valence method can also be used 5 points of systems and carry out quantitative assessment；
(d) information processing capability C4Appraisal procedure
The information processing capability C of information system4Is defined as:
Wherein, C41For resource sharing capability, C42For redundancy backup ability, C43For processor host frequency, C44For memory, C45For
Start time, C46For Low temperature start-ability, C47For volume, C48For weight, by this eight aspects to the information of information system at
Reason ability C4It is evaluated, γC41、γC42、γC43、γC44、γC45、γC46、γC47、γC48Respectively resource sharing capability C41、
Redundancy backup ability C42, processor host frequency C43, memory C44, starting time C45, Low temperature start-ability C46, volume C47With weight C48
In evaluation information processing capacity C4When weight, γC41+γC42+γC43+γC44+γC45+γC46+γC47+γC48=1；Weight
In evaluation procedure, determined according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
For resource sharing capability C41With redundancy backup ability C42, using the evaluation of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or Fuzzy Evaluation Method
Method can also be used 5 points of systems and carry out quantitative assessment；For processor host frequency C43, memory C44, starting time C45, cold-starting energy
Power C46, volume C47With weight C48, after progress test analysis obtains the numerical result of different schemes, using 1 change method is returned, will count
Value conversion is assessed for unified dimension；
(e) information storage capability C5Appraisal procedure
The information storage capability C of information system5Is defined as:
Wherein, C51For memory capacity, C52For redundancy backup ability, C53Ability, C are exported for data54For safe and secret energy
Power, by this four aspects to the information storage capability C of information system5It is evaluated, γC51、γC52、γC53、γC54Respectively
Memory capacity C51, redundancy backup ability C52, data export ability C53With safe and secret ability C54In evaluation information storage capacity C5
When weight, γC51+γC52+γC53+γC54=1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
For memory capacity C51, redundancy backup ability C52, data export ability C53With safe and secret ability C54, using layer
The evaluation method of fractional analysis or Fuzzy Evaluation Method can also be used 5 points of systems and carry out quantitative assessment；
(f) interactive capability C6Appraisal procedure
The interactive capability C of information system6Is defined as:
Wherein, C61For learnability, C62For ease for use, C63For aobvious control integration capability, C64For redundant ability, C65For occupant's work
Make load, C66For ergonomic, by this six aspects to the interactive capability C of information system6It is evaluated, γC61、
γC62、γC63、γC64、γC65、γC66Respectively learnability C61, ease for use C62, aobvious control integration capability C63, redundant ability C64, multiply
Member's workload C65With ergonomic C66In evaluation interactive capability C6When weight, γC61+γC62+γC63+γC64+γC65
+γC66=1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
For learnability C61, ease for use C62, aobvious control integration capability C63, redundant ability C64, occupant's workload C65And people
Machine work efficiency C66, using the evaluation methods of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or Fuzzy Evaluation Method, 5 points of systems can also be used and carry out quantitative assessment.
(3) beneficial effect
Compared with prior art, the present invention establishes a kind of method for assessing special vehicle information system efficiency,
In terms of the opening of information system, cooperative ability, platform capabilities three, specific appraisal procedure is proposed, it can be scientific, complete
Face is assessed by function, the performance etc. of information system.
The present invention gives a kind of appraisal procedures of special vehicle information system, can comprehensively consider Weight of Expert, index
The factors such as weight and qualitative index and quantitative target, assess the comprehensive effectiveness of information system.
Information system efficiency estimation method of the present invention is not limited only to special vehicle, and can be applied to it
The measures of effectiveness of its weaponry information system.
The present invention is for current domestic special vehicle field of information system, it is difficult to carry out science to the efficiency of information system and comment
The problem of estimating proposes a kind of special vehicle information system efficiency estimation method, can believe relatively comprehensively, objectively tank armor
The function and performance of breath system carry out scientific evaluation, provide foundation for the efficiency of evaluation information system.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 is technical solution of the present invention schematic illustration.
Specific embodiment
To keep the purpose of the present invention, content and advantage clearer, with reference to the accompanying drawings and examples, to of the invention
Specific embodiment is described in further detail.
In order to solve the above technical problems, the present invention provides a kind of special vehicle information system efficiency estimation method, this method
In, for the design scheme of special vehicle information system, system effectiveness is defined as:
S=f { A, B, C }=α1·A+α2·B+α3·C
Wherein, A refers to opening, and B refers to that cooperative ability, C refer to platform capabilities, and system effectiveness S passes through to systemic openness, collaboration
It is assessed and is obtained in terms of ability and platform capabilities three, α1、α2And α3Respectively opening A, cooperative ability B, platform capabilities C
Weight, in evaluation procedure, according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP) determine, α1+α2+α3=1；
(1) the open A appraisal procedure of information system
The open A of information system is defined as:
Wherein, A1For reconfigurable property, A2For scalability, A3For supportability, A4For standardization, pass through this four
Aspect evaluates the open A of information system, βA1、βA2、βA3、βA4Respectively reconfigurable property A1, scalability A2、
Supportability A3And standardized A4Weight when evaluating opening A, βA1+βA2+βA3+βA4=1；
Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
(a) reconfigurable property A1Appraisal procedure
The reconfigurable property A of information system1Is defined as:
Wherein, A11For adaptability, A12For interchangeability, by the two aspects to the reconfigurable property A of information system1Into
Row evaluation, γA11、γA12Respectively adaptability A11With interchangeability A12Evaluating reconfigurable property A1When weight, γA11+
γA12=1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
Adaptability A11Refer to the ability with another one system unit of part replacement with identity function, performance, mutually
Transsexual A12Refer to the ability of the interchange system component between different type platform；Adaptability A11With interchangeability A12Using level point
A variety of different evaluation methods such as analysis method or Fuzzy Evaluation Method, can also be used 5 points of systems or other stage divisions carry out quantitative assessment；
(b) scalability A2Appraisal procedure
The scalability A of information system2Is defined as:
Wherein, A21For longitudinal scalability, A22For horizontal scalability, A23For surplus, A24For modularization, by this four
Scalability A of a aspect to information system2It is evaluated, γA21、γA22、γA23、γA24Respectively longitudinal scalability A21、
Horizontal scalability A22, surplus A23With modularization A24In evaluation scalability A2When weight, γA21+γA22+γA23+γA24
=1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
Longitudinal scalability A21Refer to the ability for increasing system resource, such as processor upgrade, increase memory；It laterally can
Scalability A22Refer to the ability for increasing or decreasing system unit or software；Surplus A23Refer to the spare surplus of system, such as stores empty
Between, bus bandwidth etc.；Longitudinal scalability A21, horizontal scalability A22, surplus A23With modularization A24Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or
A variety of different evaluation methods such as Fuzzy Evaluation Method also carry out quantitative assessment using 5 points of systems or other stage divisions；
(c) supportability A3Appraisal procedure
The supportability A of information system3It may be defined as:
Wherein, A31For built-in test (BIT) ability, A32For with higher level's Maintenance Support System interconnection capability, pass through the two
Aspect can supportability A to information system3It is evaluated, γA31、γA32Respectively built-in test (BIT) ability A31With with it is upper
Grade Maintenance Support System interconnection capability A32In evaluation supportability A3When weight, γA31+γA32=1；Weight is in evaluation procedure
In, it is determined according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
Built-in test (BIT) ability A31With with higher level's Maintenance Support System interconnection capability A32, using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or mould
A variety of different evaluation methods such as evaluation assessment are pasted, also carry out quantitative assessment using 5 points of systems or other stage divisions；
(d) standardized A4Appraisal procedure
The standardized A of information system4It may be defined as:
Wherein, A41For selection standard and technology, A42For electric interfaces, A43It, can be right by these three aspects for information interface
The standardized A of information system4It is evaluated, γA41、γA42、γA43Respectively selection standard and technology A41, electric interfaces A42With
Information interface A43In evaluation criterion A4When weight, γA41+γA42+γA43=1；Weight is in evaluation procedure, according to level
Analytic approach determines；
Selection standard and technology A41, electric interfaces A42With information interface A43, using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or Fuzzy Evaluation Method etc.
A variety of different evaluation methods, can also be used 5 points of systems or other stage divisions carry out quantitative assessment；
(2) the cooperative ability B appraisal procedure of information system
The cooperative ability B of information system may be defined as:
Wherein, B1Ability, B are managed for task2For the ability of interconnecting, B3For communication capacity, by these three aspects to letter
The cooperative ability B of breath system is evaluated, βB1、βB2、βB3Respectively task manages ability B1, the ability that interconnects B2With communication energy
Power B3Weight when evaluating cooperative ability B, βB1+βB2+βB3=1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
(a) task manages ability B1Appraisal procedure
The task of information system manages ability B1It may be defined as:
Wherein, B11For mission planning ability, B12To assist decision-making capability, B13For information fusion faculty, B14For voice commander
Ability, B15For data command ability, B16For interoperability, B17For multisensor-multitarget tracking ability, B18For more weapon managerial abilities,
Ability B is managed by task of this eight aspects to information system1It is evaluated, γB11、γB12、γB13、γB14、γB15、
γB16、γB17、γB18Respectively mission planning ability B11, aid decision ability B12, information fusion faculty B13, voice command energy
Power B14, data command ability B15, interoperability B16, multisensor-multitarget tracking ability B17With more weapon managerial ability B18Appoint in evaluation
Be engaged in control ability B1When weight, γB11+γB12+γB13+γB14+γB15+γB16+γB17+γB18=1；Weight was being evaluated
Cheng Zhong is determined according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
For mission planning ability B11, aid decision ability B12, information fusion faculty B13, voice command ability B14, data
Command ability B15, interoperability B16, multisensor-multitarget tracking ability B17With more weapon managerial ability B18, using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or
A variety of different evaluation methods such as Fuzzy Evaluation Method, can also be used 5 points of systems or other stage divisions carry out quantitative assessment；
(b) ability that interconnects B2Appraisal procedure
The ability B that interconnects of information system2It may be defined as:
Wherein, B21To interconnect ability with vehicle, B22To interconnect ability with infantry, B23For with armed helicopter
Interconnect ability, B24To interconnect ability with fighter plane, B25To interconnect ability with unmanned plane, B26It is mutual with naval vessel
Join interoperability, B27To interconnect ability with cannon, by this seven aspects to the ability B that interconnects of information system2Into
Row evaluation, γB21、γB22、γB23、γB24、γB25、γB26、γB27Respectively interconnect with vehicle ability B21, it is mutual with infantry
Join interoperability B22, interconnect ability B with armed helicopter23, interconnect ability B with fighter plane24And unmanned plane interconnects
Interoperability B25And interconnect ability B on naval vessel26It interconnects ability B with cannon27It interconnects ability B in evaluation2When
Weight, γB21+γB22+γB23+γB24+γB25+γB26+γB27=1；Weight is in evaluation procedure, according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
It determines；
For interconnecting ability B with vehicle21, interconnect ability B with infantry22, interconnect energy with armed helicopter
Power B23, interconnect ability B with fighter plane24, interconnect ability B with unmanned plane25And interconnect ability B on naval vessel26With with
Cannon interconnects ability B27, using a variety of different evaluation methods such as analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or Fuzzy Evaluation Method, can also be used 5 points
System or other stage divisions carry out quantitative assessment；
(c) communication capacity B3Appraisal procedure
The communication capacity B of information system3It may be defined as:
Wherein, B31For dynamic group net ability, B32For communication bandwidth, B33For traffic rate, B34For communication distance, B35It is anti-
Interference performance, B36For redundant ability, by this six aspects to the communication capacity B of information system3It is evaluated, γB31、γB32、
γB33、γB34、γB35、γB36Respectively dynamic group net ability B31, communication bandwidth B32, traffic rate B33, communication distance B34, it is anti-
Interference performance B35With redundant ability B36In evaluation communication capacity B3When weight, γB31+γB32+γB33+γB34+γB35+γB36
=1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
For dynamic group net ability B31, anti-interference ability B35, redundant ability B36, using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or fuzzy evaluation
A variety of different evaluation methods such as method, can also be used 5 points of systems or other stage divisions carry out quantitative assessment；For communication bandwidth
B32, traffic rate B33With communication distance B34, using 1 change method is returned, numerical value conversion is assessed for unified dimension；
(3) the platform capabilities C appraisal procedure of information system
The platform capabilities C of information system is defined as:
Wherein, C1For overall performance, C2For information Perception ability, C3For message transmission capability, C4For information processing capability, C5
For information storage capability, C6For interactive capability, the platform capabilities C of information system is evaluated by this six aspects,
βC1、βC2、βC3、βC4、βC5、βC6Respectively overall performance C1, information Perception ability C2, message transmission capability C3, information processing capability
C4, information storage capability C5With interactive capability C6Weight in evaluation platform ability C, βC1+βC2+βC3+βC4+βC5+βC6=
1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
(a) overall performance C1Appraisal procedure
The overall performance C of information system1Is defined as:
Wherein, C11For task integration capability, C12For function synthesized ability, C13For security of system, C14It is reliable for system
Property, C15For processor type, C16For type of operating system, C17For software development environment type, C18For programming language type, lead to
This eight aspects are crossed to the overall performance C of information system1It is evaluated, γC11、γC12、γC13、γC14、γC15、γC16、
γC17、γC18Respectively task integration capability C11, function synthesized ability C12, security of system C13, system reliability C14, processing
Device type C15, type of operating system C16, software development environment type C17With programming language type C18In evaluation overall performance C1When
Weight, γC11+γC12+γC13+γC14+γC15+γC16+γC17+γC18=1；Weight is in evaluation procedure, according to level point
Analysis method determines；
For task integration capability C11, function synthesized ability C12, security of system C13With system reliability C14, using layer
A variety of different evaluation methods such as fractional analysis or Fuzzy Evaluation Method, can also be used 5 points of systems or other stage divisions are quantified
Evaluation；For processor type C15, type of operating system C16, software development environment type C17With programming language type C18, carry out
After statistics obtains the statistical result of different schemes, using 1 change method is returned, numerical value conversion is assessed for unified dimension；
(b) information Perception ability C2Appraisal procedure
The information Perception ability C of information system2Is defined as:
Wherein, C21For target detection ability, C22For targeting capability, C23For target traceability, C24For road conditions perception
Ability, C25For vehicle condition sensing capability, by this five aspects to the information Perception ability C of information system2It is evaluated, γC21、
γC22、γC23、γC24、γC25Respectively target detection ability C21, targeting capability C22, target traceability C23, road conditions sense
Know ability C24With vehicle condition sensing capability C25In evaluation information sensing capability C2When weight, γC21+γC22+γC23+γC24+γC25
=1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
For target detection ability C21, targeting capability C22, target traceability C23, road conditions sensing capability C24And vehicle
Condition sensing capability C25, using a variety of different evaluation methods such as analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or Fuzzy Evaluation Method, can also be used 5 points of systems or its
Its stage division carries out quantitative assessment；
(c) message transmission capability C3Appraisal procedure
The message transmission capability C of information system3Is defined as:
Wherein, C31For transmission rate, C32For delay, C33For redundant ability, by these three aspects to the letter of information system
Cease transmittability C3It is evaluated, γC31、γC32、γC33Respectively transmission rate C31, delay C32With redundant ability C33It is evaluating
Message transmission capability C3When weight, γC31+γC32+γC33=1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
For transmission rate C31With delay C32, carry out after test analysis obtains the result of different schemes, using returning 1 change side
Method assesses numerical value conversion for unified dimension；For redundant ability C33, more using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or Fuzzy Evaluation Method etc.
The different evaluation method of kind, can also be used 5 points of systems or other stage divisions carry out quantitative assessment；
(d) information processing capability C4Appraisal procedure
The information processing capability C of information system4Is defined as:
Wherein, C41For resource sharing capability, C42For redundancy backup ability, C43For processor (CPU) dominant frequency, C44For memory,
C45To start time, C46For Low temperature start-ability, C47For volume, C48For weight, by this eight aspects to the letter of information system
Cease processing capacity C4It is evaluated, γC41、γC42、γC43、γC44、γC45、γC46、γC47、γC48Respectively resource-sharing energy
Power C41, redundancy backup ability C42, processor host frequency C43, memory C44, starting time C45, Low temperature start-ability C46, volume C47With
Weight C48In evaluation information processing capacity C4When weight, γC41+γC42+γC43+γC44+γC45+γC46+γC47+γC48=
1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
For resource sharing capability C41With redundancy backup ability C42, a variety of using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or Fuzzy Evaluation Method etc.
Different evaluation methods, can also be used 5 points of systems or other stage divisions carry out quantitative assessment；For processor host frequency C43, memory
C44, starting time C45, Low temperature start-ability C46, volume C47With weight C48, carry out test analysis and obtain the numerical value of different schemes
As a result after, using 1 change method is returned, numerical value conversion is assessed for unified dimension；
(e) information storage capability C5Appraisal procedure
The information storage capability C of information system5Is defined as:
Wherein, C51For memory capacity, C52For redundancy backup ability, C53Ability, C are exported for data54For safe and secret energy
Power, by this four aspects to the information storage capability C of information system5It is evaluated, γC51、γC52、γC53、γC54Respectively
Memory capacity C51, redundancy backup ability C52, data export ability C53With safe and secret ability C54In evaluation information storage capacity C5
When weight, γC51+γC52+γC53+γC54=1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
For memory capacity C51, redundancy backup ability C52, data export ability C53With safe and secret ability C54, using layer
A variety of different evaluation methods such as fractional analysis or Fuzzy Evaluation Method, can also be used 5 points of systems or other stage divisions are quantified
Evaluation；
(f) interactive capability C6Appraisal procedure
The interactive capability C of information system6Is defined as:
Wherein, C61For learnability, C62For ease for use, C63For aobvious control integration capability, C64For redundant ability, C65For occupant's work
Make load, C66For ergonomic, by this six aspects to the interactive capability C of information system6It is evaluated, γC62、
γC62、γC63、γC64、γC65、γC66Respectively learnability C61, ease for use C62, aobvious control integration capability C63, redundant ability C64, multiply
Member's workload C65With ergonomic C66In evaluation interactive capability C6When weight, γC61+γC62+γC63+γC64+γC65
+γC66=1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
For learnability C61, ease for use C62, aobvious control integration capability C63, redundant ability C64, occupant's workload C65And people
Machine work efficiency C66, using a variety of different evaluation methods such as analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or Fuzzy Evaluation Method, 5 points of systems or other points can also be used
Grade method carries out quantitative assessment.
The above is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, it is noted that for the ordinary skill people of the art
For member, without departing from the technical principles of the invention, several improvement and deformations can also be made, these improvement and deformations
Also it should be regarded as protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (1)
1. a kind of special vehicle information system efficiency estimation method, which is characterized in that in this method, for special vehicle information system
The design scheme of system, system effectiveness is defined as:
S=f { A, B, C }=α1·A+α2·B+α3·C
Wherein, A refers to opening, and B refers to that cooperative ability, C refer to platform capabilities, and system effectiveness S passes through to systemic openness, cooperative ability
It is obtained, α with being assessed in terms of platform capabilities three1、α2And α3The respectively power of opening A, cooperative ability B, platform capabilities C
Weight determines, α in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)1+α2+α3=1；
(1) the open A appraisal procedure of information system
The open A of information system is defined as:
Wherein, A1For reconfigurable property, A2For scalability, A3For supportability, A4It is right by this four aspects for standardization
The open A of information system is evaluated, βA1、βA2、βA3、βA4Respectively reconfigurable property A1, scalability A2, ensure energy
Power A3And standardized A4Weight when evaluating opening A, βA1+βA2+βA3+βA4=1；
Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
(a) reconfigurable property A1Appraisal procedure
The reconfigurable property A of information system1Is defined as:
Wherein, A11For adaptability, A12For interchangeability, by the two aspects to the reconfigurable property A of information system1It is commented
Valence, γA11、γA12Respectively adaptability A11With interchangeability A12Evaluating reconfigurable property A1When weight, γA11+γA12=
1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
Adaptability A11Refer to the ability with another one system unit of part replacement with identity function, performance, interchangeability
A12Refer to the ability of the interchange system component between different type platform；Adaptability A11With interchangeability A12Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
Or the evaluation method of Fuzzy Evaluation Method, 5 points of systems can also be used and carry out quantitative assessment；
(b) scalability A2Appraisal procedure
The scalability A of information system2Is defined as:
Wherein, A21For longitudinal scalability, A22For horizontal scalability, A23For surplus, A24For modularization, pass through this four sides
In face of the scalability A of information system2It is evaluated, γA21、γA22、γA23、γA24Respectively longitudinal scalability A21, laterally
Scalability A22, surplus A23With modularization A24In evaluation scalability A2When weight, γA21+γA22+γA23+γA24=1；
Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
Longitudinal scalability A21Refer to the ability for increasing system resource；Horizontal scalability A22Refer to and increases or decreases system unit
Or the ability of software；Surplus A23Refer to the spare surplus of system；Longitudinal scalability A21, horizontal scalability A22, surplus A23With
Modularization A24Quantitative assessment is carried out using the evaluation method of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or Fuzzy Evaluation Method, or using 5 points of systems；
(c) supportability A3Appraisal procedure
The supportability A of information system3It may be defined as:
Wherein, A31For built-in test ability, A32For with higher level's Maintenance Support System interconnection capability, by the two aspect can be to letter
The supportability A of breath system3It is evaluated, γA31、γA32Respectively built-in test ability A31With with higher level's Maintenance Support System
Interconnection capability A32In evaluation supportability A3When weight, γA31+γA32=1；Weight is in evaluation procedure, according to step analysis
Method determines；
Built-in test ability A31With with higher level's Maintenance Support System interconnection capability A32, using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or Fuzzy Evaluation Method
Evaluation method, or quantitative assessment is carried out using 5 points of systems；
(d) standardized A4Appraisal procedure
The standardized A of information system4It may be defined as:
Wherein, A41For selection standard and technology, A42For electric interfaces, A43It, can be to information by these three aspects for information interface
The standardized A of system4It is evaluated, γA41、γA42、γA43Respectively selection standard and technology A41, electric interfaces A42And information
Interface A43In evaluation criterion A4When weight, γA41+γA42+γA43=1；Weight is in evaluation procedure, according to step analysis
Method determines；
Selection standard and technology A41, electric interfaces A42With information interface A43, using the evaluation of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or Fuzzy Evaluation Method
Method can also be used 5 points of systems and carry out quantitative assessment；
(2) the cooperative ability B appraisal procedure of information system
The cooperative ability B of information system may be defined as:
Wherein, B1Ability, B are managed for task2For the ability of interconnecting, B3For communication capacity, by these three aspects to information system
The cooperative ability B of system is evaluated, βB1、βB2、βB3Respectively task manages ability B1, the ability that interconnects B2With communication capacity B3
Weight when evaluating cooperative ability B, βB1+βB2+βB3=1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
(a) task manages ability B1Appraisal procedure
The task of information system manages ability B1It may be defined as:
Wherein, B11For mission planning ability, B12To assist decision-making capability, B13For information fusion faculty, B14Energy is commanded for voice
Power, B15For data command ability, B16For interoperability, B17For multisensor-multitarget tracking ability, B18For more weapon managerial abilities, lead to
It crosses this eight aspects and ability B is managed to the task of information system1It is evaluated, γB11、γB12、γB13、γB14、γB15、γB16、
γB17、γB18Respectively mission planning ability B11, aid decision ability B12, information fusion faculty B13, voice command ability B14、
Data command ability B15, interoperability B16, multisensor-multitarget tracking ability B17With more weapon managerial ability B18In evaluation task control
Ability B1When weight, γB11+γB12+γB13+γB14+γB15+γB16+γB17+γB18=1；Weight is in evaluation procedure, root
It is determined according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
For mission planning ability B11, aid decision ability B12, information fusion faculty B13, voice command ability B14, data commander
Ability B15, interoperability B16, multisensor-multitarget tracking ability B17With more weapon managerial ability B18, using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or obscure
The evaluation method of evaluation assessment can also be used 5 points of systems and carry out quantitative assessment；
(b) ability that interconnects B2Appraisal procedure
The ability B that interconnects of information system2It may be defined as:
Wherein, B21To interconnect ability with vehicle, B22To interconnect ability with infantry, B23To be interconnected with armed helicopter
Interoperability, B24To interconnect ability with fighter plane, B25To interconnect ability with unmanned plane, B26It is mutual with naval vessel interconnection
Logical ability, B27To interconnect ability with cannon, by this seven aspects to the ability B that interconnects of information system2It is commented
Valence, γB21、γB22、γB23、γB24、γB25、γB26、γB27Respectively interconnect with vehicle ability B21And infantry's interconnection is mutual
Logical ability B22, interconnect ability B with armed helicopter23, interconnect ability B with fighter plane24, interconnect with unmanned plane
Ability B25And interconnect ability B on naval vessel26It interconnects ability B with cannon27It interconnects ability B in evaluation2When power
Weight, γB21+γB22+γB23+γB24+γB25+γB26+γB27=1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
For interconnecting ability B with vehicle21, interconnect ability B with infantry22, interconnect ability with armed helicopter
B23, interconnect ability B with fighter plane24, interconnect ability B with unmanned plane25And interconnect ability B on naval vessel26With with fire
Big gun interconnects ability B27, using the evaluation methods of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or Fuzzy Evaluation Method, 5 points of systems can also be used and quantitatively commented
Valence；
(c) communication capacity B3Appraisal procedure
The communication capacity B of information system3It may be defined as:
Wherein, B31For dynamic group net ability, B32For communication bandwidth, B33For traffic rate, B34For communication distance, B35It is anti-interference
Ability, B36For redundant ability, by this six aspects to the communication capacity B of information system3It is evaluated, γB31、γB32、
γB33、γB34、γB35、γB36Respectively dynamic group net ability β31, communication bandwidth B32, traffic rate B33, communication distance β34, it is anti-
Interference performance B35With redundant ability B36In evaluation communication capacity B3When weight, γB31+βB32+γB33+βB34+βB35+βB36=1；
Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
For dynamic group net ability B31, anti-interference ability B35, redundant ability B36, using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or Fuzzy Evaluation Method
Evaluation method can also be used 5 points of systems and carry out quantitative assessment；For communication bandwidth B32, traffic rate B33With communication distance B34, adopt
With 1 change method is returned, numerical value conversion is assessed for unified dimension；
(3) the platform capabilities C appraisal procedure of information system
The platform capabilities C of information system is defined as:
Wherein, C1For overall performance, C2For information Perception ability, C3For message transmission capability, C4For information processing capability, C5For letter
Cease storage capacity, C6For interactive capability, the platform capabilities C of information system is evaluated by this six aspects, βC1、
βC2、βC3、βC4、βC5、βC6Respectively overall performance C1, information Perception ability C2, message transmission capability C3, information processing capability C4、
Information storage capability C5With interactive capability C6Weight in evaluation platform ability C, βC1+βC2+βC3+βC4+βC5+βC6=1；
Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
(a) overall performance C1Appraisal procedure
The overall performance C of information system1Is defined as:
Wherein, C11For task integration capability, C12For function synthesized ability, C13For security of system, C14For system reliability, C15
For processor type, C16For type of operating system, C17For software development environment type, C18For programming language type, by this eight
Overall performance C of a aspect to information system1It is evaluated, γC11、γC12、γC13、γC14、γC15、γC16、γC17、γC18
Respectively task integration capability C11, function synthesized ability C12, security of system C13, system reliability C14, processor type C15、
Type of operating system C16, software development environment type C17With programming language type C18In evaluation overall performance C1When weight,
γC11+γC12+γC13+γC14+γC15+γC16+γC17+γC18=1；Weight is true according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in evaluation procedure
It is fixed；
For task integration capability C11, function synthesized ability C12, security of system C13With system reliability C14, using level point
The evaluation method of analysis method or Fuzzy Evaluation Method can also be used 5 points of systems and carry out quantitative assessment；For processor type C15, operation system
Unite type C16, software development environment type C17With programming language type C18, counted the statistical result for obtaining different schemes
Afterwards, using 1 change method is returned, numerical value conversion is assessed for unified dimension；
(b) information Perception ability C2Appraisal procedure
The information Perception ability C of information system2Is defined as:
Wherein, C21For target detection ability, C22For targeting capability, C23For target traceability, C24Energy is perceived for road conditions
Power, C25For vehicle condition sensing capability, by this five aspects to the information Perception ability C of information system2It is evaluated, γC21、
γC22、γC23、γC24、γC25Respectively target detection ability C21, targeting capability C22, target traceability C23, road conditions sense
Know ability C24With vehicle condition sensing capability C25In evaluation information sensing capability C2When weight, γC21+γC22+γC23+γC24+γC25
=1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
For target detection ability C21, targeting capability C22, target traceability C23, road conditions sensing capability C24With vehicle condition sense
Know ability C25, using the evaluation methods of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or Fuzzy Evaluation Method, 5 points of systems can also be used and carry out quantitative assessment；
(c) message transmission capability C3Appraisal procedure
The message transmission capability C of information system3Is defined as:
Wherein, C31For transmission rate, C32For delay, C33For redundant ability, passed by information of these three aspects to information system
Movement Capabilities C3It is evaluated, γC31、γC32、γC33Respectively transmission rate C31, delay C32With redundant ability C33In evaluation information
Transmittability C3When weight, γC31+γC32+γC33=1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
For transmission rate C31With delay C32,, will using 1 change method is returned after progress test analysis obtains the result of different schemes
Numerical value conversion is assessed for unified dimension；For redundant ability C33, using the evaluation side of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or Fuzzy Evaluation Method
Method can also be used 5 points of systems and carry out quantitative assessment；
(d) information processing capability C4Appraisal procedure
The information processing capability C of information system4Is defined as:
Wherein, C41For resource sharing capability, C42For redundancy backup ability, C43For processor host frequency, C44For memory, C45For starting
Time, C46For Low temperature start-ability, C47For volume, C48For weight, by this eight aspects to the information processing energy of information system
Power C4It is evaluated, γC41、γC42、γC43、γC44、γC45、γC46、γC47、γC48Respectively resource sharing capability C41, redundancy
Backup capabilities C42, processor host frequency C43, memory C44, starting time C45, Low temperature start-ability C46, volume C47With weight C48It is commenting
Valence information processing capability C4When weight, γC41+γC42+γC43+γC44+γC45+γC46+γC47+γC48=1；Weight is being commented
During valence, determined according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
For resource sharing capability C41With redundancy backup ability C42, using the evaluation method of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or Fuzzy Evaluation Method,
5 points of systems can also be used and carry out quantitative assessment；For processor host frequency C43, memory C44, starting time C45, Low temperature start-ability C46、
Volume C47With weight C48, after progress test analysis obtains the numerical result of different schemes, using 1 change method is returned, numerical value is converted
It is assessed for unified dimension；
(e) information storage capability C5Appraisal procedure
The information storage capability C of information system5Is defined as:
Wherein, C51For memory capacity, C52For redundancy backup ability, C53Ability, C are exported for data54For safe and secret ability, lead to
This four aspects are crossed to the information storage capability C of information system5It is evaluated, γC51、γC52、γC53、γC54Respectively store
Capacity C51, redundancy backup ability C52, data export ability C53With safe and secret ability C54In evaluation information storage capacity C5When
Weight, γC51+γC52+γC53+γC54=1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
For memory capacity C51, redundancy backup ability C52, data export ability C53With safe and secret ability C54, using level point
The evaluation method of analysis method or Fuzzy Evaluation Method can also be used 5 points of systems and carry out quantitative assessment；
(f) interactive capability C6Appraisal procedure
The interactive capability C of information system6Is defined as:
Wherein, C61For learnability, C62For ease for use, C63For aobvious control integration capability, C64For redundant ability, C65It is negative for occupant's work
Lotus, C66For ergonomic, by this six aspects to the interactive capability C of information system6It is evaluated, γC61、γC62、
γC63、γC64、γC65、γC66Respectively learnability C61, ease for use C62, aobvious control integration capability C63, redundant ability C64, Cheng Yuangong
Make load C65With ergonomic C66In evaluation interactive capability C6When weight, γC61+γC62+γC63+γC64+γC65+
γC66=1；Weight determines in evaluation procedure according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
For learnability C61, ease for use C62, aobvious control integration capability C63, redundant ability C64, occupant's workload C65And ergonomic
C66, using the evaluation methods of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) or Fuzzy Evaluation Method, 5 points of systems can also be used and carry out quantitative assessment.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201611237275.2A CN106815471B (en) | 2016-12-28 | 2016-12-28 | A kind of special vehicle information system efficiency estimation method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201611237275.2A CN106815471B (en) | 2016-12-28 | 2016-12-28 | A kind of special vehicle information system efficiency estimation method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN106815471A CN106815471A (en) | 2017-06-09 |
| CN106815471B true CN106815471B (en) | 2019-04-19 |
Family
ID=59110288
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201611237275.2A Active CN106815471B (en) | 2016-12-28 | 2016-12-28 | A kind of special vehicle information system efficiency estimation method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN106815471B (en) |
Families Citing this family (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US10831190B2 (en) | 2017-08-22 | 2020-11-10 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | System, method, and processor-readable medium for autonomous vehicle reliability assessment |
| CN108734399B (en) * | 2018-05-17 | 2021-08-13 | 沈阳航空航天大学 | Nuclear accident unmanned aerial vehicle rescue performance evaluation method |
| CN109839106B (en) * | 2019-02-22 | 2021-07-23 | 上海蔚来汽车有限公司 | Driving simulation system, and evaluation method and system of vehicle-mounted information entertainment system |
| CN110955994B (en) * | 2019-11-25 | 2023-05-23 | 中国海洋大学 | Combustible ice exploitation environment safety virtual simulation evaluation system and method |
| CN114219220B (en) * | 2021-11-18 | 2022-12-09 | 中国电子产品可靠性与环境试验研究所（（工业和信息化部电子第五研究所）（中国赛宝实验室）） | Human-machine ergonomics assessment method, system, computer device and storage medium |
| CN115470638B (en) * | 2022-09-19 | 2023-10-20 | 中国人民解放军陆军装甲兵学院 | Military vehicle efficiency evaluation method |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102103722A (en) * | 2011-03-18 | 2011-06-22 | 北京航空航天大学 | Warship reliability quantitative requirement demonstration method |
| CN102136034A (en) * | 2011-03-18 | 2011-07-27 | 北京航空航天大学 | Military aircraft reliability quantitative requirement demonstration method |
| CN102902882A (en) * | 2012-09-14 | 2013-01-30 | 安徽南瑞继远软件有限公司 | Method for evaluating operation quality of information systems |
| CN104077456A (en) * | 2014-07-06 | 2014-10-01 | 哈尔滨工业大学 | Method for performance evaluation of spacecraft attitude control ground simulation system |
-
2016
- 2016-12-28 CN CN201611237275.2A patent/CN106815471B/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102103722A (en) * | 2011-03-18 | 2011-06-22 | 北京航空航天大学 | Warship reliability quantitative requirement demonstration method |
| CN102136034A (en) * | 2011-03-18 | 2011-07-27 | 北京航空航天大学 | Military aircraft reliability quantitative requirement demonstration method |
| CN102902882A (en) * | 2012-09-14 | 2013-01-30 | 安徽南瑞继远软件有限公司 | Method for evaluating operation quality of information systems |
| CN104077456A (en) * | 2014-07-06 | 2014-10-01 | 哈尔滨工业大学 | Method for performance evaluation of spacecraft attitude control ground simulation system |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| 战斗机编队协同作战效能评估研究;夏庆军 等;《系统仿真学报》;20100930;第22卷(第9期);第2182-2184页 |
| 指挥自动化系统效能评估的方法;吴晓艳 等;《黔东南民族师范高等专科学校学报》;20060228;第24卷(第1期);第29-30页 |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN106815471A (en) | 2017-06-09 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN106815471B (en) | A kind of special vehicle information system efficiency estimation method | |
| CN106502266B (en) | Multi-machine collaborative operation command control system | |
| Carley et al. | Destabilizing terrorist networks | |
| CN113392521B (en) | Method and system for constructing resource marshalling model for air-sea joint combat mission | |
| CN108182536B (en) | CPS security defense method for power distribution network based on finiteness | |
| CN110929394A (en) | Combined combat system modeling method based on super network theory and storage medium | |
| CN108647414A (en) | Operation plan adaptability analysis method based on emulation experiment and storage medium | |
| CN105825022A (en) | Multi-Agent-based dynamic equipment security system efficiency evaluation method and system | |
| CN101819661A (en) | Method for analyzing and evaluating decision supporting capability of complex system | |
| CN103617447B (en) | The evaluation system of intelligent substation and evaluation methodology | |
| CN107368991A (en) | A kind of Emergency Logistics addressing arrangement path method for averagely exceeding regret value based on α reliabilitys | |
| CN111598393A (en) | Data link network operation reliability assessment method based on hyper-network theory | |
| CN104780535A (en) | Method and device for authenticating safe center node in multi-terminal cooperative process | |
| CN106851689B (en) | Multifactor method for allocating tasks in wireless sensor and actor network | |
| CN115826614A (en) | Multi-unmanned aerial vehicle energy support task allocation method | |
| CN109324505A (en) | A kind of collaboration detecting and control method based on machine learning | |
| Li et al. | Reliability allocation and prediction for command and control system | |
| CN113435624A (en) | Man-machine function distribution method | |
| Jin et al. | Operation framework of the command information system based on big data analysis | |
| CN103391218B (en) | A kind of be applied to power system based on data management system at different levels | |
| Yu et al. | Screening of effectiveness evaluation index and construction of network index system of command and control system | |
| Zhao et al. | SE-DEA-SVM evaluation method of ECM operational disposition scheme | |
| CN103870882A (en) | System and method for analyzing war power indicator system based on models | |
| Jingyu et al. | Construction of Equipment Support Commanding Ability Indicators System Based on Information System | |
| CN103281756B (en) | A kind of communication measure selection method rapidly and efficiently |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |