CN106776331A - The assessment method of software maturity, device and system - Google Patents
The assessment method of software maturity, device and system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106776331A CN106776331A CN201611221611.4A CN201611221611A CN106776331A CN 106776331 A CN106776331 A CN 106776331A CN 201611221611 A CN201611221611 A CN 201611221611A CN 106776331 A CN106776331 A CN 106776331A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- software
- defect
- weighted score
- state
- maturity
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
- G06F11/3692—Test management for test results analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
- G06F11/3688—Test management for test execution, e.g. scheduling of test suites
Abstract
The invention discloses a kind of assessment method of software maturity, device and system, wherein, method includes：Obtain the relevant information of all software defects that software product to be tested and assessed exists under current state, including the software defect last defect state and its corresponding first weighted score, severity and its corresponding second weighted score；Respectively by corresponding first weighted score of last defect state and corresponding second weighted score of severity of each software defect, the software maturity value desired value of each software defect is calculated；Software maturity value desired value to all software defects is calculated, and obtains the software maturity value desired value of software product to be tested and assessed.The present invention proposes a kind of measures of new SMI, by the SMI values that are calculated based on defect state and its severity as reference index, stability and software maturity state of the software product at current time can fully be reflected, with effective research and development, assessment process for instructing to ensure software quality.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to software evaluation technology, especially a kind of assessment method of software maturity, device and system.
Background technology
The ability that software quality (Software Quality) is with software product meets explicitly or implicitly demand is relevant
The summation of features and characteristics, in brief, software quality is the combination of some characteristics of software, and it only relies upon software in itself.Mesh
Before, mainly by both direction come the software quality of evaluation software product：One is satisfaction to product demand, i.e.,：Software
The measurement index of product completeness；During another is software development process, the module variations in software product may cause software
Unstable evaluation index, i.e.,：The stability assessment index of software product.
Institute of Electrical and Electric Engineers (Institute of Electrical and Electronics
Engineers, IEEE) a kind of stability assessment index of software maturity index (SMI) as software product is proposed with, its
In stability be：The change for being based upon each software product issue and doing.
A kind of method of existing calculating SMI is：The maintenance workload of SMI and software product is connected, one is formed
Individual empirical model, for the complexity that metric software is safeguarded；When calculating the SMI of current issue software using the empirical model, need
The basic measurement data and the computational methods of SMI wanted are as follows：
Number of modules MT in current issue software；
The number of modules Fc changed in current issue software；
Added number of modules Fa in current issue software；
Number of modules Fd in once issue deleted in current issue software, preceding.
By formula：SMI=[MT- (Fa+Fc+Fd)]/MT, calculates the SMI of current issue software.When SMI is close to 1,
Software product just starts stabilization.
Realize it is of the invention during, inventor by study find, above-mentioned existing SMI and its computational methods are at least
There is problems with：
The SMI and its computational methods of existing software product, are the complexity analyzings based on software product maintenance, what it was directed to
It is software development process, reaching certain index for a software product of macroscopic view, overall assessment need to do the degree for changing, and
The software maturity of a certain moment software product can not be reflected, to the research and development for ensureing software quality, assessment process without real
Border directive significance.
The content of the invention
An embodiment of the present invention technical problem to be solved is：The assessment method and dress of a kind of software maturity are provided
Put, electronic equipment, to obtain the software maturity of software product at a time software product.
One side according to embodiments of the present invention, there is provided a kind of software maturity assessment method, including：
Obtain the relevant information of all software defects that software product to be tested and assessed exists under current state；Wherein, own
Software defect includes more than one software defect, and the relevant information of each software defect includes that last of the software defect lacks
Fall into state and its corresponding first weighted score, and the software defect severity and its corresponding second weighted score；
Respectively by corresponding first weighted score of last defect state and severity of each software defect corresponding
Two weighted scores, calculate the software maturity value desired value of each software defect；
Software maturity value desired value to all software defects is calculated, and obtains the software product to be tested and assessed
Software maturity value desired value.
Alternatively, in the assessment method of above-mentioned software maturity, the defect state includes：Newly report Open, go up again
Reopen is reported, Resolved to be verified, checking modification has been solved and is effectively closed Closed, treats further to verify Verified, soft
Part defect lacks important information Wait For Info, the invalid Review Invalid of software defect, does not currently solve software defect
Review Wont fix, reacquisition software defect information Works For Me, current project close software defect Plan.
Alternatively, in the assessment method of above-mentioned software maturity, in the defect state, first group the first of defect state
Weighted score, the first weighted score of second group of defect state, the first weighted score, the 4th group of defect of the 3rd group of defect state
First weighted score of state is raised successively；
Wherein, first group of defect state includes：Closed is effectively closed in checking modification, and current project closes software defect
Plan；
Second group of defect state includes：Resolved to be verified solved, treated further to verify Verified, software defect
Invalid Review Invalid, software defect Review Wont fix are not currently solved；
3rd group of defect state includes：Software defect lacks important information Wait For Info, reacquires software defect
Information Works For Me；
4th group of defect state includes：Newly report Open, report Reopen again.
Alternatively, in the assessment method of above-mentioned software maturity, first group of first weighted score of defect state is M, the
Two groups of first weighted scores of defect state are M+2, and the 3rd group of the first weighted score of defect state is M+3, the 4th group of defect
First weighted score of state is M+4；Wherein, the value of M is more than or equal to 0.
Alternatively, in the assessment method of above-mentioned software maturity, the severity includes：It is extremely serious Blocker, serious
Critical, important Major, general Minor.
Alternatively, it is second weighted score of the general Minor, described heavy in the assessment method of above-mentioned software maturity
Want the second weighted score, second weighted score of the serious Critical, the second of the extremely serious Blocker of Major
Weighted score is raised successively.
Alternatively, in the assessment method of above-mentioned software maturity, second weighted score of the general Minor is N, described
Second weighted score of important Major is 5N, second weighted score of the serious Critical is 10N, described extremely serious
Second weighted score of Blocker is 20N；Wherein, the value of N is more than 0.
Alternatively, it is described respectively by last defect of each software defect in the assessment method of above-mentioned software maturity
Corresponding first weighted score of state and corresponding second weighted score of severity, calculate the software maturity value of each software defect
Desired value includes：Corresponding first weighted score of last defect state for calculating each software defect respectively is corresponding with severity
The second weighted score product, obtain the software maturity value desired value of each software defect；
Or
The software maturity value desired value of described pair of all software defects is calculated, and obtains the software product to be tested and assessed
Software maturity value desired value include：
Read group total is carried out to the software maturity value desired value of all software defects, obtain described in treat test and evaluation software
The software maturity value desired value of product.
Alternatively, it is described to obtain software product to be tested and assessed under current state in the assessment method of above-mentioned software maturity
The relevant information of all software defects for existing, including：
All software defects that software product to be tested and assessed exists under current state are obtained from software defect information table
Relevant information；
Wherein, the software defect information table includes the software that software product occurred in exploitation and/or test process
The integrated information of defect, the integrated information of the software defect includes the relevant information of software defect；
The integrated information of the software defect is created when the software defect occurs or is further updated.
Other side according to embodiments of the present invention, there is provided a kind of software maturity assessment device, including：
Acquiring unit, the related letter for obtaining all software defects that software product to be tested and assessed exists under current state
Breath；Wherein, all software defects include more than one software defect, and the relevant information of each software defect includes the software defect
Last defect state and its corresponding first weighted score, and the software defect severity and its corresponding second
Weighted score；
First computing unit, for respectively by corresponding first weighted score of last defect state of each software defect
The second weighted score corresponding with severity, calculates the software maturity value desired value of each software defect；
Second computing unit, calculates for the software maturity value desired value to all software defects, obtains
The software maturity value desired value of the software product to be tested and assessed.
Alternatively, in the assessment device of above-mentioned software maturity, the defect state includes：Newly report Open, go up again
Reopen is reported, Resolved to be verified, checking modification has been solved and is effectively closed Closed, treats further to verify Verified, soft
Part defect lacks important information Wait For Info, the invalid Review Invalid of software defect, does not currently solve software defect
Review Wont fix, reacquisition software defect information Works For Me, current project close software defect Plan.
Alternatively, in the assessment device of above-mentioned software maturity, in the defect state, first group the first of defect state
Weighted score, the first weighted score of second group of defect state, the first weighted score, the 4th group of defect of the 3rd group of defect state
First weighted score of state is raised successively；
Wherein, first group of defect state includes：Closed is effectively closed in checking modification, and current project closes software defect
Plan；
Second group of defect state includes：Resolved to be verified solved, treated further to verify Verified, software defect
Invalid Review Invalid, software defect Review Wont fix are not currently solved；
3rd group of defect state includes：Software defect lacks important information Wait For Info, reacquires software defect
Information Works For Me；
4th group of defect state includes：Newly report Open, report Reopen again.
Alternatively, in the assessment device of above-mentioned software maturity, the severity includes：It is extremely serious Blocker, serious
Critical, important Major, general Minor；
It is second weighted score of the general Minor, second weighted score of the important Major, described serious
Second weighted score of Critical, second weighted score of the extremely serious Blocker are raised successively.
Alternatively, in the assessment device of above-mentioned software maturity, first computing unit is each specifically for calculating respectively
Corresponding first weighted score of last defect state of software defect and the product of corresponding second weighted score of severity,
Obtain the software maturity value desired value of each software defect；
Or
Second computing unit, asks specifically for the software maturity value desired value to all software defects
And calculating, obtain the software maturity value desired value of the software product to be tested and assessed.
Another aspect according to embodiments of the present invention, there is provided a kind of software maturity evaluation system, including：
Defect information management system, be stored with software defect information table, and the software defect information table includes software product
The integrated information of the software defect occurred in exploitation and/or test process, the integrated information of the software defect is including soft
The relevant information of part defect；The integrated information of the software defect is created or by further more when the software defect occurs
Newly；
The assessment device of software maturity, is working as obtaining software product to be tested and assessed from the software defect information table
The relevant information of all software defects existed under preceding state；Wherein, all software defects include more than one software defect, often
The relevant information of individual software defect includes last defect state and its corresponding first weighted score of the software defect, with
And the severity and its corresponding second weighted score of the software defect；Respectively by last defect state of each software defect
Corresponding first weighted score and corresponding second weighted score of severity, calculate the software maturity value index of each software defect
Value；And the software maturity value desired value of all software defects is calculated, obtain the software product to be tested and assessed
Software maturity value desired value.
The assessment method of software maturity, device and the system provided based on the above embodiment of the present invention, to software product
Software maturity when being tested and assessed, obtain the correlation of all software defects that software product to be tested and assessed exists under current state
Information, the relevant information of each software defect includes last defect state of the software defect and its corresponding first weighting
Score value, and the software defect severity and its corresponding second weighted score；Respectively by each software defect last
Corresponding first weighted score of defect state and corresponding second weighted score of severity, the software for calculating each software defect are ripe
Angle value desired value；Software maturity value desired value to all software defects is calculated, and obtains the soft of software product to be tested and assessed
Part maturation angle value desired value.The embodiment of the present invention proposes a kind of measures of new SMI, is worked as according to software product to be tested and assessed
The defect state and its severity of all software defects (BUG) of preceding presence, calculate the current SMI of the software product to be tested and assessed
Value, is used as the reference index of SMI, because the measures of the SMI are entered based on all BUG that software product there is currently
OK, it can fully reflect stability of the software product at current time, and research and development, tester are based on the SMI values, just can be real
When, be fully understood by software maturity state of the software product at current time, so as to be applied to effectively instruct ensure software quality
Research and development, assessment process.
Below by drawings and Examples, technical scheme is described in further detail.
Brief description of the drawings
The Description of Drawings embodiments of the invention of a part for specification are constituted, and together with description for explaining
Principle of the invention.
Referring to the drawings, according to following detailed description, the present invention can be more clearly understood from, wherein：
Fig. 1 is the flow chart of assessment method one embodiment of invention software maturity.
Fig. 2 is the flow chart of another embodiment of the assessment method of invention software maturity.
Fig. 3 is a trend graph of the SMI values of software product in the embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 4 is the structural representation of assessment device one embodiment of invention software maturity.
Fig. 5 is the structural representation of evaluation system one embodiment of invention software maturity.
Specific embodiment
Describe various exemplary embodiments of the invention in detail now with reference to accompanying drawing.It should be noted that：Unless had in addition
Body illustrates that the part and the positioned opposite of step, numerical expression and numerical value for otherwise illustrating in these embodiments do not limit this
The scope of invention.
Simultaneously, it should be appreciated that for the ease of description, the size of the various pieces shown in accompanying drawing is not according to reality
Proportionate relationship draw.
The description only actually at least one exemplary embodiment is illustrative below, never as to the present invention
And its any limitation applied or use.
May be not discussed in detail for technology, method and apparatus known to person of ordinary skill in the relevant, but suitable
In the case of, the technology, method and apparatus should be considered as a part for specification.
It should be noted that：Similar label and letter represents similar terms in following accompanying drawing, therefore, once a certain Xiang Yi
It is defined in individual accompanying drawing, then it need not be further discussed in subsequent accompanying drawing.
The embodiment of the present invention can apply to electronic equipment, for example：Mobile terminal, computer system, server, it can be with
Numerous other universal or special computing system environments or configuration are operated together.It is suitable to and mobile terminal, computer system, server
The example of the well-known computing system, environment and/or the configuration that are used together is included but is not limited to：Personal computer system,
Server computer system, thin client, thick client computer, hand-held or laptop devices, the system based on microprocessor, Set Top Box,
Programmable consumer electronics, NetPC Network PC, minicomputer system, large computer system and including any of the above described system
Distributed cloud computing technology environment of system, etc..
Computer system/server can be in computer system executable instruction (the such as journey performed by computer system
Sequence module) general linguistic context under describe.Generally, program module can include routine, program, target program, component, logic, number
According to structure etc., they perform specific task or realize specific abstract data type.Computer system/server can be with
Implement in distributed cloud computing environment, in distributed cloud computing environment, task is by by the long-range of communication network links
What reason equipment was performed.In distributed cloud computing environment, program module may be located at the Local or Remote meter including storage device
On calculation system storage medium.
Fig. 1 is the flow chart of assessment method one embodiment of invention software maturity.As shown in figure 1, the embodiment
The assessment method of software maturity includes：
102, obtain the relevant information of all software defects that software product to be tested and assessed exists under current state.
Wherein, above-mentioned all software defects include more than one software defect, and each software defect in the same time may not
In different defect states (Status), the relevant information of each software defect includes last defect of the software defect
State and its corresponding first weighted score, and the software defect severity and its corresponding second weighted score.
104, corresponding first weighted score of last defect state by each software defect is corresponding with severity respectively
The second weighted score, calculate the SMI values of each software defect.
106, the SMI values to all software defects are calculated, and obtain the SMI values of software product to be tested and assessed.
A kind of assessment method of the software maturity provided based on the above embodiment of the present invention, it is proposed that survey of new SMI
Mode is commented, when the software maturity to software product is tested and assessed, obtains what software product to be tested and assessed existed under current state
The relevant information of all BUG, the relevant information of each BUG includes last defect state and its corresponding first of the BUG
Weighted score, and the BUG severity and its corresponding second weighted score；Respectively by last defect shape of each BUG
Corresponding first weighted score of state and corresponding second weighted score of severity, calculate the SMI values of each BUG；To all BUG's
SMI values are calculated, and obtain the SMI values of whole software product to be tested and assessed, and are used as the reference index of SMI, the lower table of SMI values
The stability of showing software product is better, maturity is higher.By the institute that the measures of the SMI there is currently based on software product
Having BUG is carried out, and it can fully reflect stability of the software product at current time, and research and development, tester are based on the SMI values,
Just can in real time, be fully understood by software maturity state of the software product at current time, so as to be applied to effectively instruct ensure
The research and development of software quality, assessment process.
In a specific example of the assessment method embodiment of invention software maturity, BUG defects that may be present
State can for example include：(Open) is newly reported, (Reopen) is reported again, (Resolved) to be verified has been solved, has been verified and repair
Change and effectively close (Closed), treat further to verify that (Verified), software defect lack important information (Wait For
Info), software defect invalid (Review Invalid), currently do not solve software defect (Review Wont fix), obtain again
Take software defect information (Works For Me), current project and close software defect (Plan).
In the exploitation and test process of software product, may be according to feelings such as project demands change, the BUG for occurring
Condition, is constantly changed software product, therefore, in the exploitation and test process of software product, lacking for BUG may be caused
The state of falling into is being continually changing, so that a BUG there may be multiple defect states, enters for the software product under a state
When row software maturity is tested and assessed, last defect state of BUG could reflect the current defect state of the BUG under the state,
Therefore last defect state and its corresponding first weighted score of each BUG participate in calculating the BUG under selection current state
SMI values.
Wherein, influences of the BUG of different defect states to software product stability is different, for example, checking modification is effectively closed
Close (Closed) state and current project closes the end-state that software defect (Plan) state is BUG life cycles, to software
The stability of product does not influence；Solve (Resolved) state to be verified, treat further to verify (Verified) state, soft
Invalid (Review Invalid) state of part defect and current software defect (the Review Wont fix) state that do not solve are " to treat
Checking " state, the stability influence to software product is smaller；Software defect lacks important information (Wait For Info) state
It is the state that need to further provide for information with software defect information (the Works For Me) state of reacquisition, to software product
Stability influence is larger；It is the initial of BUG life cycles newly to report (Open) state and report (Reopen) state again, due to
It is the new problem for reporting, the stability influence to software product is maximum.Accordingly, each defect state can be respectively and sets corresponding
First weighted score reflects the influence degrees of the BUG to software product stability of each defect state.
For example, first group of defect can be set according to the BUG of each defect state to the influence degree of software product stability
First weighted score of state, the first weighted score of second group of defect state, the first weighted score of the 3rd group of defect state,
First weighted score of the 4th group of defect state is raised successively.Wherein, first group of defect state includes：Checking modification is effectively closed
(Closed) and current project close software defect (Plan)；Second group of defect state includes：Solve to be verified
(Resolved), treat further to verify (Verified), software defect invalid (Review Invalid) and do not solve currently soft
Part defect (Review Wont fix)；3rd group of defect state includes：Software defect lacks important information (Wait For
Info software defect information (Works For Me)), is reacquired；4th group of defect state includes：Newly report (Open) and weight
Newly report (Reopen).
For example, in a specific software product project, can set first group and lack according to the real needs of the project
First weighted score of the state of falling into is M, and second group of first weighted score of defect state is M+2, the of the 3rd group of defect state
One weighted score is M+3, and the 4th group of the first weighted score of defect state is M+4.Wherein, weighted score based on M, its value
0 can be more than or equal to.In practical application, because (Closed) state and current project closing software are effectively closed in checking modification
Defect (Plan) state is the end-state of BUG life cycles, and the stability on software product does not influence, the value of usual M
It is 0.
In actual applications, can be set according to the real needs of different software products and its BUG situations of presence
Or adjust the concrete form and its value of the first weighted score of various defect states.For example, for the solution promptness to BUG
There is the software product project of hard requirement, can correspond to will newly report (Open) state and report again (Reopen) in above-mentioned example
First weighted score of state is adjusted to M+5 or higher.
It is as shown in table 1 below, it is BUG defect states that may be present (Status), each defect state in the embodiment of the present invention
Implication explanation and corresponding first weighted score a specific example.It is real that the specific example is not used in the restriction present invention
The defect state that BUG in example is only existed or there must be is applied, without in limiting corresponding first weighted score of each defect state
Specific value form and size, the record of those skilled in the art's present invention embodiment, can increase or part increase,
Reduce or BUG defect states that may be present are reduced in part, can according to the actual requirements adjust each defect state corresponding first
The specific value form and/or size of weighted score, can know the survey of the invention software maturity under the above variation
Comment implementing for method.
Table 1
In another specific example of the assessment method embodiment of invention software maturity, the severity of software defect
Can be divided into following four ranks according to the order of severity：Extremely serious (Blocker), serious (Critical), important (Major) and
Typically (Minor).General second weighted score of (Minor), second weighted score of important (Major), serious
(Critical) the second weighted score, second weighted score of extremely serious (Blocker) are raised successively in sequence, and second adds
Power score value is higher, and the order of severity of software defect is more serious.
For example, the second weighted score that general (Minor) can be set be N, second weighted score of important (Major) be
5N, second weighted score of serious (Critical) are 10N, second weighted score of extremely serious (Blocker) is 20N.Wherein,
The value of N is more than 0.
It is as shown in table 2 below, be the severity (Priority) of BUG in the embodiment of the present invention, the implication explanation of each severity,
And a specific example of corresponding second weighted score.The specific example is not used in and limits BUG in the embodiment of the present invention
The partition of the level of severity, without in the specific value form and size that limit corresponding second weighted score of each severity,
The record of those skilled in the art's present invention embodiment, can increase or decrease the number of levels of the severity of BUG, will be tight
Severe is divided into more or less than four ranks, it is also possible to adjust corresponding second weighting point of each severity according to the actual requirements
The specific value form and/or size of value, can know the assessment method of the invention software maturity under the above variation
Implement.
Table 2
| Severity (Priority) | Severity explanation | Second weighted score |
| Blocker | Pole serious problems, influence the research and development progress of software product | 20N |
| Critical | Serious problems, influence the use of software product | 10N |
| Major | Major issue | 5N |
| Minor | General considerations, it is proposed that modification class problem | N |
Wherein, Minor is suggestion class problem, and the stability influence degree to software product is minimum, can set its second plus
Weighted N based on power score value；
Major is major issue, and it is slightly higher to solve priority, and certain influence can be caused on the stability of software product, can be with
Second weighted score has been set for 5N；
Critical is serious problems, it is necessary to solved, and will otherwise influence the normal of software product to use, to software product
Stability influence it is very high, the second weighted score can be set for 10N；
Blocker is pole serious problems, and setting severity rank is primarily directed to some influence project feasibilities or directly
Connecing causes the extreme problem of project failure, can set the second weighted score for 20N.
In another specific example of the assessment method embodiment of invention software maturity, in aforesaid operations 104,
Specifically can be by calculating corresponding first weighted score of last defect state of each BUG and severity corresponding respectively
The product of two weighted scores, obtains the SMI values of each BUG.Specifically, the SMI values of each BUG can be expressed as SMIi, wherein, i tables
Show i-th software defect that software product to be tested and assessed exists under current state, i=1,2 ..., n, n are software product to be tested and assessed
The numerical value of all BUG existed under current state, the value of n is the integer more than 0；Or, i can also treat test and evaluation software
BUG marks (ID) in product, in a software product to be tested and assessed, one BUG of each BUG ID unique mark.
Such as with [Status]iRepresent the BUG that software product to be tested and assessed exists under current stateiLast defect shape
Corresponding first weighted score of state, [Priority]iRepresent the BUG that software product to be tested and assessed exists under current stateiIt is serious
Corresponding second weighted score is spent, then BUG can be calculated by equation belowiSMI values：SMIi=[Status]i×
[Priority]i
For example, if setting M=0, N=1, then for single BUG, the SMI values SMI for calculatingiRefer to such as following table
3。
Table 3
In another specific example of the assessment method embodiment of invention software maturity, in aforesaid operations 106,
The SMI of all BUG that test and evaluation software product exists under current state can specifically be treatediRead group total is carried out to be treated
The SMI values of test and evaluation software product, i.e.,：SMI=SUM (SMIi)=SUM ([Status]i×[Priority]i), i=1,2 ...,
N, n are the numerical value of all BUG that software product to be tested and assessed exists under current state, and the value of n is the integer more than 0；Or,
I can also be the BUG ID in software product to be tested and assessed, in a software product to be tested and assessed, each BUG ID unique mark one
Individual BUG.
In addition, in the assessment method of invention software maturity another embodiment, can be in software defect information table
In, for the software defect that software product occurs in exploitation and/or test process, create each software of software product appearance
The integrated information of defect, the integrated information of the software defect includes the relevant information of software defect, and subsequently occur it is new soft
The integrated information of existing software defect is updated during part defect or according to the demand of research and development, test, for example, research and development, tester
Member can update its defect state and/or severity according to the treatment of BUG progress, or be changed according to the demand of software product project
Become first weighted score and/or the second weighted score of BUG.In practical application, software defect information table therein specifically can be with
It is the information of record developer and/or tester's input in an EXCEL table, or a BUG management system
Database, or the table generated to the information that BUG management systems are input into based on developer and/or tester, etc..
Then with the embodiment correspondingly, in operation 102, software product to be tested and assessed specifically is obtained from software defect information table
The relevant information of all software defects existed under current state.
Fig. 2 is the flow chart of another embodiment of the test and appraisal of invention software maturity.As shown in Fig. 2 the embodiment is soft
The assessment method of part maturity includes：
202, the phase of all BUG that software product to be tested and assessed exists under current state is obtained from software defect information table
Pass information.
Wherein, above-mentioned all BUG include that more than one BUG, each BUG be not likely to be at different defect shapes in the same time
State, the relevant information of each BUG includes last defect state and its corresponding first weighted score of the BUG, and should
The severity of BUG and its corresponding second weighted score.
204, corresponding first weighted score [Status] of last defect state of each BUG is calculated respectivelyiWith it is serious
Spend corresponding second weighted score [Priority]iProduct, obtain the SMI of each software defectiValue：SMIi=[Status]i×
[Priority]i。
Wherein, i represents i-th BUG, i=1,2 ... that software product to be tested and assessed exists under current state, n, and n is to treat
The numerical value of all BUG that test and evaluation software product exists under current state, the value of n is the integer more than 0；Or, i can also
It is the BUG ID in software product to be tested and assessed, in a software product to be tested and assessed, one BUG of each BUG ID unique mark.
Assuming that there are 2 BUG under current state in software product to be tested and assessed, wherein the 1st BUG is in software defect information table
In be described as follows shown in table 4, the 2nd BUG being described as follows shown in table 5 in software defect information table.
Table 4
Table 5
In above-mentioned table 4 and table 5, SMT represents the item id of software product to be tested and assessed, and each item id unique mark one is soft
Part product, 1990 and 1991 is BUG ID.
Then according to table 4, the 1st defect state Status of BUG is Open, the first weighted score [Status]1990=4；
Severity Priority is Critical, the second weighted score [Priority]1990=20, if M=0, N=1, then according to table 3,
The 1st SMI values SMI of BUG can be known1990=40.
According to table 5, the 2nd defect state Status of BUG is Resolved, the first weighted score [Status]1991=
2；Severity Priority is Major, the second weighted score [Priority]1991=5, if M=0, N=1, then according to table 3, can
To know the 2nd SMI values SMI of BUG1991=10.
206, treat the SMI of all BUG that test and evaluation software product exists under current stateiRead group total is carried out, i.e.,：
SMI=SUM (SMIi)=SUM ([Status]i×[Priority]i) obtain the SMI values of software product to be tested and assessed.
Wherein, i=1,2 ..., n, n are the numerical value of all BUG that software product to be tested and assessed exists under current state, n's
Value is the integer more than 0；Or, i can also be the BUG ID in software product to be tested and assessed, in a software product to be tested and assessed
In, one BUG of each BUG ID unique mark.
Continue to operate the example in 204, to the SMI of the two BUGiCarry out read group total：SMI1990+SMI1991=40+10
=50.
An application based on the embodiment of the present invention, can obtain software product in SMI values not in the same time.For macroscopic view
Aware software product in whole research and development, the software maturity of test phase, can in the research and development of software product, test phase,
Its SMI value is calculated according to predetermined period (for example, week, moon etc.), the maturity state of software product can be in real time understood, can be with
The SMI value drafting patterns that further different cycles are calculated, so that more intuitive aware software product is in whole research and development, test
The software maturity situation of change in stage.As shown in figure 3, being one one of the SMI values of software product in the embodiment of the present invention
Trend graph, the trend graph gives change of the software product in the SMI values of each week (WEEK).
In addition, in further applying based on the embodiment of the present invention, can be by observing the trend of SMI curves in trend graph
(rise, decline), analyzes reason, to instruct to adjust the focus that software product is researched and developed；Can also be in the exploitation of software product
After project terminates, by the global shape feature of SMI curves, cause SMI curve abnormality flex points in analysis project work, to change
Enter follow-up work；In addition, can also be concluded according to the Long-term change trend feature of SMI curves by the contrast of the SMI curves of disparity items
Classification item type, to help improve project management mechanism.
One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that：Realizing all or part of step of above method embodiment can pass through
Programmed instruction related hardware is completed, and foregoing program can be stored in a computer read/write memory medium, the program
Upon execution, the step of including above method embodiment is performed；And foregoing storage medium includes：ROM, RAM, magnetic disc or light
Disk etc. is various can be with the medium of store program codes.
Fig. 4 is the structural representation of assessment device one embodiment of invention software maturity.The software of the embodiment
The assessment device of maturity can be used to realize the assessment method embodiment of the above-mentioned each software maturity of the present invention.As shown in figure 4, should
The assessment device of embodiment software maturity includes：Acquiring unit, the first computing unit and the second computing unit.Wherein：
Acquiring unit, the relevant information for obtaining all BUG that software product to be tested and assessed exists under current state.
Wherein, above-mentioned all BUG include that more than one BUG, each BUG be not likely to be at different defect shapes in the same time
State (Status), the relevant information of each BUG includes last defect state of the BUG and its corresponding first weighting point
Value, and the BUG severity and its corresponding second weighted score.
In specific example, BUG defect states that may be present can for example include：Newly report (Open), report again
(Reopen) (Resolved) to be verified, checking modification, has been solved effectively to close (Closed), treat further checking
(Verified), software defect lack important information (Wait For Info), software defect invalid (Review Invalid),
It is current not solve software defect (Review Wont fix), reacquire software defect information (Works For Me), currentitem
Mesh closes software defect (Plan).
In the exploitation and test process of software product, may be according to feelings such as project demands change, the BUG for occurring
Condition, is constantly changed software product, therefore, in the exploitation and test process of software product, lacking for BUG may be caused
The state of falling into is being continually changing, so that a BUG there may be multiple defect states, enters for the software product under a state
When row software maturity is tested and assessed, last defect state of BUG could reflect the current defect state of the BUG under the state,
Therefore last defect state and its corresponding first weighted score of each BUG participate in calculating the BUG under selection current state
SMI values.
Wherein, influences of the BUG of different defect states to software product stability is different, for example, checking modification is effectively closed
Close (Closed) state and current project closes the end-state that software defect (Plan) state is BUG life cycles, to software
The stability of product does not influence；Solve (Resolved) state to be verified, treat further to verify (Verified) state, soft
Invalid (Review Invalid) state of part defect and current software defect (the Review Wont fix) state that do not solve are " to treat
Checking " state, the stability influence to software product is smaller；Software defect lacks important information (Wait For Info) state
It is the state that need to further provide for information with software defect information (the Works For Me) state of reacquisition, to software product
Stability influence is larger；It is the initial of BUG life cycles newly to report (Open) state and report (Reopen) state again, due to
It is the new problem for reporting, the stability influence to software product is maximum.Accordingly, each defect state can be respectively and sets corresponding
First weighted score reflects the influence degrees of the BUG to software product stability of each defect state.
For example, first group of defect can be set according to the BUG of each defect state to the influence degree of software product stability
First weighted score of state, the first weighted score of second group of defect state, the first weighted score of the 3rd group of defect state,
First weighted score of the 4th group of defect state is raised successively.Wherein, first group of defect state includes：Checking modification is effectively closed
(Closed) and current project close software defect (Plan)；Second group of defect state includes：Solve to be verified
(Resolved), treat further to verify (Verified), software defect invalid (Review Invalid) and do not solve currently soft
Part defect (Review Wont fix)；3rd group of defect state includes：Software defect lacks important information (Wait For
Info software defect information (Works For Me)), is reacquired；4th group of defect state includes：Newly report (Open) and weight
Newly report (Reopen).
For example, in a specific software product project, can set first group and lack according to the real needs of the project
First weighted score of the state of falling into is M, and second group of first weighted score of defect state is M+2, the of the 3rd group of defect state
One weighted score is M+3, and the 4th group of the first weighted score of defect state is M+4.Wherein, weighted score based on M, its value
0 can be more than or equal to.In practical application, because (Closed) state and current project closing software are effectively closed in checking modification
Defect (Plan) state is the end-state of BUG life cycles, and the stability on software product does not influence, the value of usual M
It is 0.
In another specific example, the severity of software defect can be divided into following four ranks according to the order of severity：
Extremely serious (Blocker), serious (Critical), important (Major) and typically (Minor).Typically second weighting of (Minor)
Score value, second weighted score of important (Major), second weighted score of serious (Critical), extremely serious (Blocker)
Second weighted score is raised successively in sequence, and the second weighted score is higher, and the order of severity of software defect is more serious.
For example, the second weighted score that general (Minor) can be set be N, second weighted score of important (Major) be
5N, second weighted score of serious (Critical) are 10N, second weighted score of extremely serious (Blocker) is 20N.Wherein,
The value of N is more than 0.
First computing unit, for respectively by corresponding first weighted score of last defect state of each BUG and tight
Corresponding second weighted score of severe, calculates the software maturity value desired value of each BUG.
Exemplarily, the first computing unit specifically can be corresponding by calculating last defect state of each BUG respectively
The first weighted score and corresponding second weighted score of severity product, obtain the SMI values of each BUG.Specifically, each BUG
SMI values can be expressed as SMIi, wherein, i represents that i-th software that software product to be tested and assessed exists under current state lacks
Fall into, i=1,2 ..., n, n are the numerical value of all BUG that software product to be tested and assessed exists under current state, the value of n be more than
0 integer；Or, i can also be BUG marks (ID) in software product to be tested and assessed, in a software product to be tested and assessed, often
Individual one BUG of BUG ID unique marks.
Such as with [Status]iRepresent the BUG that software product to be tested and assessed exists under current stateiLast defect shape
Corresponding first weighted score of state, [Priority]iRepresent the BUG that software product to be tested and assessed exists under current stateiIt is serious
Corresponding second weighted score is spent, then the first computing unit can calculate BUG by equation belowiSMI values：SMIi=
[Status]i×[Priority]i
Second computing unit, calculates for the software maturity value desired value to above-mentioned all BUG, obtains and waits to test and assess
The software maturity value desired value of software product.
Exemplarily, what the second computing unit can specifically treat that test and evaluation software product exists under current state is all
The SMI of BUGiCarry out read group total to obtain the SMI values of software product to be tested and assessed, i.e.,：SMI=SUM (SMIi)=SUM
([Status]i×[Priority]i), i=1,2 ..., n, n be software product to be tested and assessed exist under current state it is all
The numerical value of BUG, the value of n is the integer more than 0；Or, i can also be the BUG ID in software product to be tested and assessed, at one
In software product to be tested and assessed, one BUG of each BUG ID unique mark.
The assessment device of the software maturity provided based on the above embodiment of the present invention, it is current according to software product to be tested and assessed
The defect state and its severity of all software defects (BUG) for existing, calculate the current SMI of the software product to be tested and assessed
Value, is used as the reference index of SMI, because the measures of the SMI are entered based on all BUG that software product there is currently
OK, it can fully reflect stability of the software product at current time, and research and development, tester are based on the SMI values, just can be real
When, be fully understood by software maturity state of the software product at current time, so as to be applied to effectively instruct ensure software quality
Research and development, assessment process.
The embodiment of the present invention additionally provides a kind of evaluation system of software maturity.As shown in figure 5, for invention software into
The structural representation of evaluation system one embodiment of ripe degree.In the embodiment, the evaluation system of software maturity includes defect
The assessment device of information management system and software maturity.Wherein：
Defect information management system, be stored with BUG information tables, and the BUG information tables include that software product is being developed and/or surveyed
The integrated information of the BUG occurred during examination, the integrated information of BUG includes the relevant information of BUG；The integrated information of BUG exists
The BUG is created when occurring or is further updated.
The assessment device of software maturity, for obtaining software product to be tested and assessed from BUG information tables under current state
The relevant information of all BUG for existing；Wherein, all BUG include more than one BUG, and the relevant information of each BUG includes should
Last defect state of BUG and its corresponding first weighted score, and the BUG severity and its corresponding second plus
Power score value；Respectively by corresponding second weighting of corresponding first weighted score of last defect state and severity of each BUG
Score value, calculates the software maturity value desired value of each BUG；And the software maturity value desired value of all BUG is calculated,
Obtain the software maturity value desired value of software product to be tested and assessed.
Specifically, the assessment device of the software maturity in the embodiment can be ripe based on any of the above-described embodiment software
The structure of the assessment device of degree is realized.
The evaluation system of the software maturity provided based on the above embodiment of the present invention, it is current according to software product to be tested and assessed
The defect state and its severity of all software defects (BUG) for existing, calculate the current SMI of the software product to be tested and assessed
Value, is used as the reference index of SMI, because the measures of the SMI are entered based on all BUG that software product there is currently
OK, it can fully reflect stability of the software product at current time, and research and development, tester are based on the SMI values, just can be real
When, be fully understood by software maturity state of the software product at current time, so as to be applied to effectively instruct ensure software quality
Research and development, assessment process.
Each embodiment is described by the way of progressive in this specification, and what each embodiment was stressed is and it
The difference of its embodiment, same or analogous part cross-reference between each embodiment.For device, system reality
Apply for example, because it is substantially corresponding with embodiment of the method, so description is fairly simple, related part is referring to embodiment of the method
Part explanation.
The method of the present invention, device and system may be achieved in many ways.For example, can be by software, hardware, firmware
Or any combinations of software, hardware, firmware realize the method for the present invention, device and system.The step of for methods described
Said sequence be not limited to order described in detail above merely to illustrate, the step of the method for the present invention, unless with
Other manner is illustrated.Additionally, in certain embodiments, also the present invention can be embodied as recording journey in the recording medium
Sequence, these programs include the machine readable instructions for realizing the method according to the invention.Thus, the present invention also covering storage is used
In the recording medium of the program for performing the method according to the invention.
Description of the invention is given for the sake of example and description, and is not exhaustively or by the present invention
It is limited to disclosed form.Many modifications and variations are for the ordinary skill in the art obvious.Select and retouch
State embodiment and be to more preferably illustrate principle of the invention and practical application, and one of ordinary skill in the art is managed
The solution present invention is suitable to the various embodiments with various modifications of special-purpose so as to design.
Claims (15)
1. a kind of assessment method of software maturity, it is characterised in that including：
Obtain the relevant information of all software defects that software product to be tested and assessed exists under current state；Wherein, all softwares
Defect includes more than one software defect, and the relevant information of each software defect includes last defect shape of the software defect
State and its corresponding first weighted score, and the software defect severity and its corresponding second weighted score；
Added by corresponding first weighted score of last defect state and severity corresponding second of each software defect respectively
Power score value, calculates the software maturity value desired value of each software defect；
Software maturity value desired value to all software defects is calculated, and obtains the soft of the software product to be tested and assessed
Part maturation angle value desired value.
2. method according to claim 1, it is characterised in that the defect state includes：Newly report Open, report again
Reopen, solved Resolved to be verified, checking modification effectively close Closed, treat further to verify Verified, software
Defect lacks important information Wait For Info, the invalid Review Invalid of software defect, does not currently solve software defect
Review Wont fix, reacquisition software defect information Works For Me, current project close software defect Plan.
3. method according to claim 2, it is characterised in that in the defect state, first group the first of defect state
Weighted score, the first weighted score of second group of defect state, the first weighted score, the 4th group of defect of the 3rd group of defect state
First weighted score of state is raised successively；
Wherein, first group of defect state includes：Closed is effectively closed in checking modification, and current project closes software defect Plan；
Second group of defect state includes：Resolved to be verified solved, treated further to verify that Verified, software defect are invalid
Review Invalid, software defect Review Wont fix are not currently solved；
3rd group of defect state includes：Software defect lacks important information Wait For Info, reacquires software defect information
Works For Me；
4th group of defect state includes：Newly report Open, report Reopen again.
4. method according to claim 3, it is characterised in that first group of first weighted score of defect state is M, second
First weighted score of group defect state is M+2, and the 3rd group of the first weighted score of defect state is M+3, the 4th group of defect shape
First weighted score of state is M+4；Wherein, the value of M is more than or equal to 0.
5. the method according to Claims 1-4 any one, it is characterised in that the severity includes：It is extremely serious
Blocker, serious Critical, important Major, general Minor.
6. method according to claim 5, it is characterised in that second weighted score of the general Minor, described important
Second weighted score of Major, second weighted score of the serious Critical, the second of the extremely serious Blocker add
Power score value is raised successively.
7. method according to claim 6, it is characterised in that second weighted score of the general Minor is N, described
Second weighted score of important Major is 5N, second weighted score of the serious Critical is 10N, described extremely serious
Second weighted score of Blocker is 20N；Wherein, the value of N is more than 0.
8. the method according to claim 1 to 7 any one, it is characterised in that it is described respectively by each software defect most
Corresponding first weighted score of latter defect state and corresponding second weighted score of severity, calculate the soft of each software defect
Part maturation angle value desired value includes：Calculate respectively each software defect corresponding first weighted score of last defect state and
The product of corresponding second weighted score of severity, obtains the software maturity value desired value of each software defect；
Or
The software maturity value desired value of described pair of all software defects is calculated, and obtains the soft of the software product to be tested and assessed
Part maturation angle value desired value includes：
Software maturity value desired value to all software defects carries out read group total, obtains the software product to be tested and assessed
Software maturity value desired value.
9. the method according to claim 1 to 8 any one, it is characterised in that described to obtain software product to be tested and assessed and exist
The relevant information of all software defects existed under current state, including：
The correlation of all software defects that software product to be tested and assessed exists under current state is obtained from software defect information table
Information；
Wherein, the software defect information table includes the software defect that software product occurred in exploitation and/or test process
Integrated information, the integrated information of the software defect includes the relevant information of software defect；
The integrated information of the software defect is created when the software defect occurs or is further updated.
10. a kind of assessment device of software maturity, it is characterised in that including：
Acquiring unit, the relevant information for obtaining all software defects that software product to be tested and assessed exists under current state；
Wherein, all software defects include more than one software defect, and the relevant information of each software defect includes the software defect
Last defect state and its corresponding first weighted score, and the software defect severity and its corresponding second plus
Power score value；
First computing unit, for respectively by corresponding first weighted score of last defect state of each software defect and tight
Corresponding second weighted score of severe, calculates the software maturity value desired value of each software defect；
Second computing unit, calculates for the software maturity value desired value to all software defects, obtains described
The software maturity value desired value of software product to be tested and assessed.
11. devices according to claim 10, it is characterised in that the defect state includes：Newly report Open, go up again
Reopen is reported, Resolved to be verified, checking modification has been solved and is effectively closed Closed, treats further to verify Verified, soft
Part defect lacks important information Wait For Info, the invalid Review Invalid of software defect, does not currently solve software defect
Review Wont fix, reacquisition software defect information Works For Me, current project close software defect Plan.
12. devices according to claim 11, it is characterised in that in the defect state, first group the of defect state
One weighted score, the first weighted score of second group of defect state, the first weighted score of the 3rd group of defect state, the 4th group lack
First weighted score of the state of falling into is raised successively；
Wherein, first group of defect state includes：Closed is effectively closed in checking modification, and current project closes software defect Plan；
Second group of defect state includes：Resolved to be verified solved, treated further to verify that Verified, software defect are invalid
Review Invalid, software defect Review Wont fix are not currently solved；
3rd group of defect state includes：Software defect lacks important information Wait For Info, reacquires software defect information
Works For Me；
4th group of defect state includes：Newly report Open, report Reopen again.
13. device according to claim 10 to 11 any one, it is characterised in that the severity includes：It is extremely serious
Blocker, serious Critical, important Major, general Minor；
Second weighted score of the general Minor, second weighted score of the important Major, the serious Critical
The second weighted score, second weighted score of the extremely serious Blocker raises successively.
14. device according to claim 10 to 13 any one, it is characterised in that first computing unit, specifically
Corresponding first weighted score of last defect state and severity corresponding second for calculating each software defect respectively
The product of weighted score, obtains the software maturity value desired value of each software defect；
Or
Second computing unit, summation meter is carried out specifically for the software maturity value desired value to all software defects
Calculate, obtain the software maturity value desired value of the software product to be tested and assessed.
A kind of 15. evaluation systems of software maturity, it is characterised in that including：
Defect information management system, be stored with software defect information table, and the software defect information table is being opened including software product
The integrated information of the software defect occurred in hair and/or test process, the integrated information of the software defect lacks including software
Sunken relevant information；The integrated information of the software defect is created when the software defect occurs or is further updated；
The assessment device of software maturity, for obtaining software product to be tested and assessed in current shape from the software defect information table
The relevant information of all software defects existed under state；Wherein, all software defects include more than one software defect, and each is soft
The relevant information of part defect includes last defect state and its corresponding first weighted score of the software defect, and should
The severity of software defect and its corresponding second weighted score；Respectively by last defect state correspondence of each software defect
The first weighted score and corresponding second weighted score of severity, calculate the software maturity value desired value of each software defect；
And the software maturity value desired value of all software defects is calculated, obtain the soft of the software product to be tested and assessed
Part maturation angle value desired value.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201611221611.4A CN106776331A (en) | 2016-12-26 | 2016-12-26 | The assessment method of software maturity, device and system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201611221611.4A CN106776331A (en) | 2016-12-26 | 2016-12-26 | The assessment method of software maturity, device and system |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN106776331A true CN106776331A (en) | 2017-05-31 |
Family
ID=58925950
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201611221611.4A Pending CN106776331A (en) | 2016-12-26 | 2016-12-26 | The assessment method of software maturity, device and system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN106776331A (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107590008A (en) * | 2017-08-02 | 2018-01-16 | 中国科学院计算技术研究所 | A kind of method and system that distributed type assemblies reliability is judged by weighted entropy |
| CN108197018A (en) * | 2017-12-12 | 2018-06-22 | 链家网（北京）科技有限公司 | A kind of software code ratio of defects statistical method and device |
| CN111124912A (en) * | 2019-12-23 | 2020-05-08 | 个体化细胞治疗技术国家地方联合工程实验室（深圳） | Quality evaluation method and device for software development project |
| CN111506634A (en) * | 2020-04-29 | 2020-08-07 | 北京金山云网络技术有限公司 | Method, device, equipment and system for performing cloud analysis on business application |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102622510A (en) * | 2012-01-31 | 2012-08-01 | 龚波 | System and method for quantitative management of software defects |
| CN105808435A (en) * | 2016-03-08 | 2016-07-27 | 北京理工大学 | Construction method of software defect evaluation model on the basis of complex network |
-
2016
- 2016-12-26 CN CN201611221611.4A patent/CN106776331A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102622510A (en) * | 2012-01-31 | 2012-08-01 | 龚波 | System and method for quantitative management of software defects |
| CN105808435A (en) * | 2016-03-08 | 2016-07-27 | 北京理工大学 | Construction method of software defect evaluation model on the basis of complex network |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 闫振兴 等: ""软件缺陷度量与软件过程管理方法研究"", 《计算机与数字工程》 * |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107590008A (en) * | 2017-08-02 | 2018-01-16 | 中国科学院计算技术研究所 | A kind of method and system that distributed type assemblies reliability is judged by weighted entropy |
| CN107590008B (en) * | 2017-08-02 | 2019-11-15 | 中国科学院计算技术研究所 | A kind of method and system judging distributed type assemblies reliability by weighted entropy |
| CN108197018A (en) * | 2017-12-12 | 2018-06-22 | 链家网（北京）科技有限公司 | A kind of software code ratio of defects statistical method and device |
| CN111124912A (en) * | 2019-12-23 | 2020-05-08 | 个体化细胞治疗技术国家地方联合工程实验室（深圳） | Quality evaluation method and device for software development project |
| CN111506634A (en) * | 2020-04-29 | 2020-08-07 | 北京金山云网络技术有限公司 | Method, device, equipment and system for performing cloud analysis on business application |
| CN111506634B (en) * | 2020-04-29 | 2023-12-08 | 北京金山云网络技术有限公司 | Method, device, equipment and system for carrying out cloud analysis on business application |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Negri et al. | Field-synchronized Digital Twin framework for production scheduling with uncertainty | |
| CN106776331A (en) | The assessment method of software maturity, device and system | |
| CN110543697B (en) | Electric power market simulation running system | |
| Matinnejad et al. | Mil testing of highly configurable continuous controllers: scalable search using surrogate models | |
| US20200090788A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for reducing chemical reaction mechanisms | |
| CN110413510A (en) | A kind of data processing method, device and equipment | |
| Singer et al. | A framework for smart control using machine-learning modeling for processes with closed-loop control in Industry 4.0 | |
| Neto et al. | Building energy consumption models based on smartphone user’s usage patterns | |
| Eberhardinger et al. | Measuring and evaluating the performance of self-organization mechanisms within collective adaptive systems | |
| Kumar et al. | Performance analysis of repairable system using GA and fuzzy Lambda-Tau methodology | |
| Singh et al. | Economic lot sizing for unreliable production system with shortages | |
| Suharyanti et al. | The scheme of product development process as a trigger to product success: A theoretical framework | |
| Grosch et al. | A framework for researching energy optimization of factory operations | |
| Zhou et al. | Towards building ai-cps with nvidia isaac sim: An industrial benchmark and case study for robotics manipulation | |
| Abraham et al. | Test-driven goal-directed debugging in spreadsheets | |
| Herber et al. | A multi-robot search using LEGO mindstorms: an embedded software design project | |
| Fierro et al. | Notes paper: enabling building application development with simulated digital twins | |
| Karunakaran et al. | A petri net simulation of software development lifecycle towards green IT | |
| Ketenci et al. | Scenario-based simulation for energy optimization in learning factory environments | |
| Nagaoka | Service business design method utilizing business dynamics | |
| US20230350392A1 (en) | Method and system for seamless transition of runtime system from controller device to digitalization platform | |
| Winther | Virtual commissioning of production process | |
| Hackenberg et al. | Towards early emergent property understanding | |
| Katsis et al. | InteractEva: A Simulation-Based Evaluation Framework for Interactive AI Systems | |
| Schuld et al. | Solid State Lighting System Reliability |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20170531 |