CN106773712A - Double feedback robust self-adaptation control methods and its Control system architecture - Google Patents
Double feedback robust self-adaptation control methods and its Control system architecture Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106773712A CN106773712A CN201710030878.3A CN201710030878A CN106773712A CN 106773712 A CN106773712 A CN 106773712A CN 201710030878 A CN201710030878 A CN 201710030878A CN 106773712 A CN106773712 A CN 106773712A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- dead time
- state
- time lag
- model
- vector
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 59
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 35
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 31
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 claims description 108
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 19
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 claims description 19
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000012886 linear function Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000005312 nonlinear dynamic Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000003889 chemical engineering Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000011217 control strategy Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000004886 process control Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 30
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 8
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 3
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000001311 chemical methods and process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000779 smoke Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
- G05B13/042—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Feedback Control In General (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a kind of pair of feedback robust self-adaptation control method and its Control system architecture, L is inherited1The ability of the powerful treatment uncertain factor of self-adaptation control method, but by the built-in controll plant dynamic dead time delay model of controller, using the forecast function of model, overcoming L1Adaptive controller time lag allowance is small, be not applied for the shortcoming of big dead time delay process;The present invention utilizes L simultaneously1Self Adaptive Control processes the ability of uncertain factor, using a kind of adaptive law of new Dual-loop feedback control strategy, reduces the requirement to built-in dynamic dead time delay model accuracy.Compared with other System design based on model methods, the present invention can have the built-in dynamic dead time delay model of larger modeling error using dynamic characteristic and time lag characteristic, and superiority is had more in terms of robustness and stability.Thus the present invention can be directly applied for big dead time delay uncertainty thermal technology and Chemical Engineering Process Control, including without obvious dead time delay and probabilistic controlled process.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the field of thermal power engineering and automatic control, and particularly relates to a double-feedback robust self-adaptive control method and a control system structure thereof, which are suitable for a large dead time lag uncertainty process.
Background
At present, the operation of a thermal system represented by a thermal power generating unit faces more and more challenges, such as rapid load tracking, large-range variable working condition operation, unknown uncertainty caused by fuel calorific value change, and immeasurable disturbance caused by smoke emission control. To deal with these problems, the thermal power unit control should have fast, adaptive and robust stability performance. L is1The self-adaptive control is a novel rapid robust self-adaptive control method, and compared with other advanced control such as predictive control and the like, the self-adaptive control has strong capability in the aspect of processing uncertainty problems such as nonlinearity, undetectable disturbance, model mismatching and the like, so that the self-adaptive control has an application prospect in a thermal power generating unit bearing power grid peak regulation and frequency modulation tasks. However, L1The self-adaptive controller has smaller time-lag margin and is easy to disperse when controlling a large pure time-lag object, and a large amount of pure time-lag phenomena exist in the thermal engineering and chemical engineering processes, so that L1Adaptive controllers are currently not suitable for use in a large number of such processes.
Disclosure of Invention
The technical problem is as follows: the invention provides a double-feedback robust self-adaptive control method capable of implementing rapid, robust, self-adaptive and stable control on a large dead time uncertainty process, aiming at solving the problem that the existing control method is difficult to simultaneously process three aspects of large dead time, nonlinearity and unknown disturbance.
The technical scheme is as follows: the invention discloses a double-feedback robust self-adaptive control method, which comprises the following steps:
step 1: initializing the structure, parameters and variables of the double-feedback robust adaptive controller, wherein the initialization comprises the initialization of an expected reference system, a state estimator and a built-in dynamic dead time lag model, and the initialization of the built-in dynamic dead time lag model comprises the initialization of a dead time-free dynamic model and a dead time lag model;
step 2: at each sampling moment, the double-feedback robust adaptive controller outputs a bounded reference input vector r (t) serving as a set value and a state vector without dead time lag output from a dynamic model without dead time lagDead-time-lag-bearing state vector output from dead-time-lag modelState vector estimator output from state estimatorAnd sampling a measurable state vector x (t) output from the controlled process, calculating a state prediction bias by a dual feedback loop
And step 3: predicting deviation of stateInputting adaptive law, calculating uncertainty estimator of controlled process
And 4, step 4: estimating an uncertaintySending the control signals into a low-pass filter and a control law module which are connected in series, and calculating the control quantity u (t) at the current moment;
and 5: sending the control quantity u (t) to a controlled object executing mechanism, and driving the controlled object to track a set value along the input and output tracks of the expected reference system; meanwhile, the control quantity u (t) is sent to a built-in dynamic dead time model, and the built-in dynamic dead time model is calculated in the next sampling period; meanwhile, the control quantity u (t) is also sent to a state estimator, and state estimation is carried out in the next sampling period; and returning to the step 2, and controlling the next sampling period.
Further, to implement step 1, the desired reference system and state estimator are described and designed for the controlled process, and the steps are as follows:
step 1-1: describing a large dead time lag uncertainty controlled process as a nonlinear state space equation with output dead time lag; the equation consists of an unmeasured state equation, an internal unmodeled state equation, a measurable state equation with pure time lag and an output equation:
wherein x isD(t)=[xD1(t)…xDn(t)]T∈RnAs an undetectable state vector, x0Is xD(t) initial vector value, xDi(t) is xD(t), i ═ 1, …, n;
x(t)=[x1(t)…xn(t)]T∈Rnis a measurable state vector, the component x of whichi(T) has a pure time lag Tdi≥0,i=1,…,n;
z (t) represents an unmodeled internal unmeasured state vector, the unknown function g (z, x)DT) represents the dynamic behavior of z (t), z0An initial vector value of z (t);
control quantity u (t) ∈ RmInput vector for controlled process, y (t) ∈ RmOutputting a vector for the controlled process; m and n represent the dimensions of the vector;
f(xDz, t) is an unknown function expressing the nonlinear dynamic characteristics of the object; coefficient matrix AD,BD,CDRepresenting the desired dynamic characteristics of a stable closed-loop system, D is an output coefficient matrix;
Step 1-2: desired dynamic characteristics A described according to step 1-1D,BD,CDDefining a desired reference system with dead time lag, described by the following state space equations:
wherein,in order for the reference state vector to be undetectable,is composed of1, …, n;
xdes(t)=[xdes,1(t),…,xdes,n(t)]∈Rnis a pure time-lagged reference state vector, the component x of whichdes,i(T) has a pure time lag Tdi≥0,i=1,…,n;
ydes(t)∈RmIs a reference output vector; coefficient matrixr(t)∈RmInputting a vector for a given bounded reference;
step 1-3: desired dynamic characteristics A described according to step 1-1D,BD,CDDefining the state estimator as:
wherein the state vector estimatorAnd output vector estimatorEstimates of a measurable state vector x (t) and an output vector y (t) of the controlled object, respectively,is an uncertainty estimator of the system, x0Is composed ofThe initial vector value of (a), the control quantity u (t) ∈ RmAlso the input vector to the state estimator.
Further, step 1 also includes steps 1-4: in order to realize the double-feedback strategy of the invention, a built-in dynamic dead time lag model of the controlled object is required to be added in the double-feedback robust self-adaptive controller, and the built-in dynamic dead time lag model consists of a dead time lag-free dynamic model and a dead time lag model.
Furthermore, the built-in dynamic dead time lag model can be described as a dead time lag-free dynamic model and a dead time lag model; a dynamic model without dead time lag can be described in the form of the following equation of state:
wherein,for a state vector without a pure time lag,is composed of1, …, n; a. them、BmIs a matrix of coefficients, x0Is composed ofThe initial vector value of (a), the control quantity u (t) ∈ RmAn input vector of a built-in dynamic dead time lag model;
the pure time lag model can be described in the form of the following pure time lag equation and output equation:
wherein the input quantity of the dead time lag model is a state vector component without dead time lagi=1,…,n;Is a state vector with dead time lag, its componentsWith dead time Tmi≥0,i=1,…,n;Outputting vectors for the built-in dynamic dead time lag model; cm、DmIs a matrix of coefficients.
Further, to implement step 2, a state prediction bias is calculated based on the dual feedback state vectorThe method comprises the following steps:
step 2-1: calculating the inner loop feedback deviation
Wherein,is the state vector of the state estimator,the state vector is a state vector without dead time lag of a built-in dynamic dead time lag model;
step 2-2: calculating an outer loop feedback offset
Wherein,the state vector with dead time lag is a built-in dynamic dead time lag model, and x (t) is a measurable state vector of a controlled process;
step 2-3: calculating a state prediction biasThe feedback error is obtained by adding the inner loop feedback error and the outer loop feedback error.
Further, to implement step 3, the states are predicted to be biasedInputting the adaptive law, calculating the uncertainty estimatorAdaptive law for predicting deviations from stateAs input, with an uncertainty estimatorIs output as followsPiecewise linear function:
wherein,
t >0 denotes the sampling period and i denotes the sampling sequence number.
Further, in step 4, the control amount u (t) is generated by the following control law:
wherein the coefficient matrix
F(s) is a low pass filter with a steady state gain of 1, s is the Laplace transform operator, r(s) anda bounded reference input vector r (t) and an uncertainty estimator, respectivelyOf laplace transform, L-1[·]Representing an inverse laplace transform.
The invention also discloses a control system structure of the double-feedback robust self-adaptive control method, which comprises a control law, a dynamic model without dead time lag, a dead time lag model, a state estimator, a first adder for forming an inner loop feedback deviation signal, a second adder for forming an outer loop feedback deviation signal, a third adder for forming a state prediction deviation signal, a self-adaptive law module and a low-pass filter; the input end of the control law inputs an input signal, the output signal of the control law is simultaneously sent to a controlled object, a dead time-lag-free dynamic model and a state estimator, the controlled object is driven by the output signal of the control law, the output end of the controlled object outputs a measurable state signal, one path of the output signal of the dead time-lag-free dynamic model is sent to the input end of the dead time-lag model, the other path of the output signal of the dead time-lag-free dynamic model is sent to a first adder, the output signal of the dead time model and the measurable state signal are sent to a second adder to obtain and output an outer loop feedback deviation signal, the control quantity signal output by the control law and the output signal of the adaptive law module are used as input signals to enter the state estimator, the output signal of the state estimator is sent to the first adder to output an inner loop feedback deviation signal, the inner loop feedback deviation signal output by the first adder and the outer loop feedback deviation signal output by the second The state prediction deviation signal is sent to an adaptive law module, one path of the output end of the adaptive law module is sent to a state estimator, the other path of the output end of the adaptive law module enters a control law through a low-pass filter connected with the adaptive law module in series, and the input signal of the control law also comprises a bounded reference input signal.
Has the advantages that: the invention inherits L1The self-adaptive control method has strong capability of processing uncertain factors, but overcomes the defect of L by arranging a controlled object dynamic dead time delay model in the controller and utilizing the prediction function of the model1The self-adaptive controller has the defects of small time lag allowance and incapability of being suitable for a large pure time lag process; while the present invention utilizes L1The capability of self-adaptive control for processing uncertain factors adopts a self-adaptive law of a new double closed-loop feedback strategy, and reduces the requirement on the precision of a built-in dynamic dead time lag model. Compared with other control methods based on models, the method can use the built-in dynamic dead time lag model with larger modeling errors in both dynamic characteristics and time lag characteristics, and is more robust and stableHas the advantages. Therefore, the invention can be directly applied to the control of large dead time uncertainty thermotechnical and chemical processes, including controlled processes without obvious dead time and uncertainty.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a control process of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the control system of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is L1Adaptive control system architecture;
FIG. 4 shows L in an embodiment1Step response curve of adaptive control system:
wherein FIG. 4-1 shows a step response curve of steam pressure; FIG. 4-2 shows a step response curve for power; 4-3 show step response curves for drum water levels; 4-4 show step response curves for fuel flow, steam valve opening, and feedwater flow;
fig. 5 is a step response curve of the control system of the present invention in an embodiment (dead time accurate with a built-in dynamic dead time model):
wherein FIG. 5-1 shows a step response curve for steam pressure; FIG. 5-2 shows a step response curve for power; 5-3 show step response curves for drum water levels; 5-4 show step response curves for fuel flow, steam valve opening, and feedwater flow;
FIG. 6 is a step response curve (dead time offset for built-in dynamic dead time model) for a control system of the present invention in an exemplary embodiment:
wherein FIG. 6-1 shows a step response curve for steam pressure; FIG. 6-2 shows a step response curve for power; 6-3 show a step response curve for drum level; fig. 6-4 show step response curves for fuel flow, steam valve opening, and feedwater flow.
Detailed Description
And the model which is widely used as a test object of the thermal control algorithm internationally, namely R.D. Bell and K.J.The invention is explained by taking the built 160MW unit machine furnace model as an example and referring to the attached drawings.
The model has no obvious pure time lag, and a pure time lag link is added on the model for implementing and verifying the invention. Adding dead time does not affect the dynamics of the model, i.e., for a given input change, the model only delays its output change by a dead time. The 160MW unit furnace model with increased dead time is as follows:
qe(t)=[0.854u2(t)-0.147]xD1(t)+45.59u1(t)-2.514u3(t)-2.096, (2)
wherein the controlled quantity is the fuel flow u1Value of [0,1]Opening u of steam valve2Value of [0,1]And the feed water flow u3Value of [0,1]All are normalized variables and are constrained by the following conditions:
0≤ui≤1,i=1,2,3;
wherein, the state variable drum pressure xD1(unit is kg/cm)2) Generated power xD2(in MW) and drum liquid density xD3(unit is kg/cm)3) Being unmeasurable, pure time-lagging state variable drum pressure x1Generated power x2And drum level deviation x3(in m) is measurable, one-to-one corresponding to the output variable y1、y2、y3Respectively having dead time-lag time Td1、Td2、Td3(unit s).
The machine furnace model has obvious pure time lag characteristic and has strong nonlinearity and uncertainty when operating in a large-range variable working condition.
A control system is designed for the model by applying the double-feedback robust self-adaptive control method provided by the invention.
Step 1: initializing the structure, parameters and variables of the double-feedback robust adaptive controller, wherein the initialization comprises the initialization of an expected reference system, a state estimator and a built-in dynamic dead time lag model, and the initialization of the built-in dynamic dead time lag model comprises the initialization of a dead time-free dynamic model and a dead time lag model;
step 1-1: the 160MW unit furnace model to increase dead time is described as:
wherein x isD(t)=[xD1(t)…xDn(t)]T∈RnAs an undetectable state vector, x0Is xD(t) initial vector value, xDi(t) is xD(t), i ═ 1, …, n;
x(t)=[x1(t)…xn(t)]T∈Rnis a measurable state vector, the component x of whichi(T) has a pure time lag Tdi≥0,i=1,…,n;
z (t) represents an unmodeled internal unmeasured state vector, the unknown function g (z, x)DT) represents the dynamic behavior of z (t), z0An initial vector value of z (t);
control quantity u (t) ∈ RmInput vector for controlled process, y (t) ∈ RmOutputting a vector for the controlled process; m and n represent the dimensions of the vector, m-n-3 in this example;
f(xDz, T) is an unknown function for expressing the nonlinear dynamic characteristics of the object, D is an output coefficient matrix, the symbol ' ∈ ' represents ' belonging ', the ' (-) on the variable represents taking derivatives, and the superscript ' T ' on the variable represents the transpose of a matrix or a vector.
Matrix AD,BD,CDThe expected dynamic characteristics of a stable closed loop system are described, and the values are as follows:
step 1-2: desired dynamic characteristics A described according to step 1-1D,BD,CDDefining a desired reference system with dead time lag, described by the following state space equations:
wherein,in order for the reference state vector to be undetectable,is composed of1, …, n;
xdes(t)=[xdes,1(t),…,xdes,n(t)]∈Rnis a pure time-lagged reference state vector, the component x of whichdes,i(T) has a pure time lag Tdi≥0,i=1,…,n;
ydes(t)∈RmIs a reference output vector; coefficient matrixWherein the superscript "-1" denotes the matrix inversion, R (t) ∈ RmInputting a vector for a given bounded reference;
the double-feedback robust adaptive controller has the function of ensuring that the output vector y (t) of the controlled process tracks the reference output vector y of the expected reference system in a bounded way for any bounded reference input vector r (t)des(t);
Step 1-3: period described according to step 1-1Inspection of dynamic characteristics AD,BD,CDDefining the state estimator as:
wherein the state vector estimatorAnd output vector estimatorEstimates of a measurable state vector x (t) and an output vector y (t) of the controlled object, respectively,is an uncertainty estimator of the system, x0Is composed ofThe initial vector value of (a), the control quantity u (t) ∈ RmAlso the input vector of the state estimator;
step 1-4: the method comprises the following steps of (1) embedding a dynamic dead time lag model of a controlled object in a controller: the built-in dynamic dead time lag model can be described as a dead time lag-free dynamic model and a dead time lag model. The present embodiment adopts a dead-time-lag-free dynamic model in the form of a state equation, which is described as follows:
wherein,without dead time lagThe state vector is then used to determine the state of the device,is composed of1, …, n; a. them、BmIs a coefficient matrix; x is the number of0Is composed ofThe initial vector value of (a), the control quantity u (t) ∈ RmIs an input vector of a built-in dynamic dead time model.
The pure time lag model can be described in the form of the following pure time lag equation and output equation:
wherein the input quantity of the dead time lag model is a state vector component without dead time lagi=1,…,n;Is a state vector with dead time lag, its componentsWith dead time Tmi≥0,i=1,…,n;Outputting vectors for the built-in dynamic dead time lag model; cm、DmIs a matrix of coefficients.
Besides the built-in dynamic dead time lag model described by the state equation, the dead time lag equation and the output equation, the built-in dynamic dead time lag model in other description forms is also applicable, and the performance of the controller is better the closer the used model and the controlled object are to the characteristic, so the built-in dynamic dead time lag models in various description forms belong to the protection scope of the invention.
Carrying out Taylor series expansion on the 160MW unit machine-made furnace model with the increased dead time lag at the working condition point x (0) ([ 108,66.65,0 ]), and obtaining the coefficient of the dynamic dead time lag model as follows:
step 2: calculating state prediction bias from dual feedback state vectorsThe method comprises the following steps:
step 2-1: calculating the inner loop feedback deviation
Wherein,is the state vector of the state estimator,the state vector is a state vector without dead time lag of a built-in dynamic dead time lag model;
step 2-2: calculating an outer loop feedback offset
Wherein,the state vector with dead time lag is a built-in dynamic dead time lag model, and x (t) is a measurable state vector of a controlled process;
step 2-3: calculating a state prediction biasThe feedback error is obtained by adding the inner loop feedback error and the outer loop feedback error.
And step 3: predicting deviation of stateInputting the adaptive law, calculating the uncertainty estimatorAdaptive law for predicting deviations from stateAs input, with an uncertainty estimatorThe following piecewise linear function for the output:
wherein,
i denotes a sampling sequence number, T >0 denotes a sampling period, and T is 0.01 s.
And 4, step 4: estimating an uncertaintyAnd (4) sending the control signals to a low-pass filter and a control law module which are connected in series, and calculating the control quantity u (t) at the current moment. The control quantity u (t) is generated by the following control law:
u(t)=L-1[u(s)], (11)
wherein
F(s) is a low pass filter with a steady state gain of 1, s is the Laplace transform operator, r(s) anda bounded reference input vector r (t) and an uncertainty estimator, respectivelyOf laplace transform, L-1[·]Representing an inverse laplace transform.
And 5: sending the control quantity u (t) to a controlled object executing mechanism, and driving the controlled object to track a set value along the input and output tracks of the expected reference system; meanwhile, the control quantity u (t) is sent to a built-in dynamic dead time model, and the built-in dynamic dead time model is calculated in the next sampling period; meanwhile, the control quantity u (t) is sent to a state estimator, and state estimation is carried out in the next sampling period; and returning to the step 2, and controlling the next sampling period.
In this embodiment, to verify the effect of the invention, a large-scale load step simulation experiment is performed, so that the state vector setting value is stepped from the initial steady-state point x (0) ([ 108,66.65,0], to another steady-state point x (t) ([ 129.6,105.8,0 ]). For comparative effect, three different controller settings were used:
(1)L1the structure of the adaptive controller is shown in figure 3. Make the dead time lag time of the machine furnace system as Td1=Td2=Td3Fig. 4-1 shows a step response curve for steam pressure, fig. 4-2 shows a step response curve for power, fig. 4-3 shows a step response curve for drum level, and fig. 4-4 shows a step response curve for fuel flow, steam valve opening, and feedwater flow.
(2) The structure of the controller of the invention is shown in figure 2. Make the dead time lag time of the machine furnace system as Td1=60s,Td2=50s,Td3Setting the dead time of the built-in dynamic dead time model as T as 40sm1=60s,Tm2=50s,Tm3Fig. 5-1 shows a step response curve for steam pressure, fig. 5-2 shows a step response curve for power, fig. 5-3 shows a step response curve for drum level, and fig. 5-4 shows a step response curve for fuel flow, steam valve opening, and feedwater flow.
(3) The structure of the controller of the invention is shown in figure 2. Make the dead time lag time of the machine furnace system as Td1=60s,Td2=50s,Td3Setting the dead time of the built-in dynamic dead time model as T as 40sm1=66s,Tm2=55s,Tm344s, with a step response as shown in fig. 6, fig. 6-1 showing a step response curve for steam pressure, fig. 6-2 showing a step response curve for power, fig. 6-3 showing a step response curve for drum level, and fig. 6-4 showing a step response curve for fuel flow, steam valve opening, and feedwater flow.
(1) The step responses of (1) and (2) are shown in FIGS. 4 and 5, respectively, and demonstrate that the controller ratio L of the present invention is the same under the same conditions1The range of time lags that the adaptive controller can control is much larger. (3) The step response is shown in figure 6, which shows that the controller of the invention can tolerate the larger difference between the time lag parameter of the built-in dynamic dead time lag model and the actual controlled process, and the controller of the invention can be used for the built-in dynamic dead time lag modelHas stronger robustness, thus being widely applied to actual large dead time lag uncertainty controlled processes, including thermal and chemical process control.
The above-described arrangements are only preferred embodiments of the present invention and are not exhaustive of the possible embodiments of the present invention. Any obvious modifications to the above would be included within the scope of the present invention, which is set forth in the following claims, and the scope of the invention is to be determined by a person of ordinary skill in the art.
Claims (8)
1. A double-feedback robust self-adaptive control method is characterized in that: the method comprises the following steps:
step 1: initializing the structure, parameters and variables of the double-feedback robust adaptive controller, wherein the initialization comprises the initialization of an expected reference system, a state estimator and a built-in dynamic dead time lag model, and the initialization of the built-in dynamic dead time lag model comprises the initialization of a dead time-free dynamic model and a dead time lag model;
step 2: at each sampling instant, the dual feedback robust adaptive controller pairs a bounded parameter as a setpointState vector without dead time lag output from dynamic model without dead time lag by considering input vector r (t)Dead-time-lag-bearing state vector output from dead-time-lag modelState vector estimator output from state estimatorAnd sampling a measurable state vector x (t) output from the controlled process, calculating a state prediction bias by a dual feedback loop
And step 3: predicting deviation of stateInputting adaptive law, calculating uncertainty estimator of controlled process
And 4, step 4: estimating an uncertaintySending the control signals into a low-pass filter and a control law module which are connected in series, and calculating the control quantity u (t) at the current moment;
and 5: sending the control quantity u (t) to a controlled object executing mechanism, and driving the controlled object to track a set value along the input and output tracks of the expected reference system; meanwhile, the control quantity u (t) is sent to a built-in dynamic dead time model, and the built-in dynamic dead time model is calculated in the next sampling period; meanwhile, the control quantity u (t) is also sent to a state estimator, and state estimation is carried out in the next sampling period; and returning to the step 2, and controlling the next sampling period.
2. The dual feedback robust adaptive control method according to claim 1, wherein: to implement step 1, the controlled process is described, and the desired reference system and state estimator are designed, as follows:
step 1-1: describing a large dead time lag uncertainty controlled process as a nonlinear state space equation with output dead time lag; the equation consists of an unmeasured state equation, an internal unmodeled state equation, a measurable state equation with pure time lag and an output equation:
wherein x isD(t)=[xD1(t)…xDn(t)]T∈RnAs an undetectable state vector, x0Is xD(t) initial vector value, xDi(t) is xD(t), i ═ 1, …, n;
x(t)=[x1(t)…xn(t)]T∈Rnis a measurable state vector, the component x of whichi(T) has a pure time lag Tdi≥0,i=1,…,n;
z (t) represents an unmodeled internal unmeasured state vector, the unknown function g (z, x)DT) represents the dynamic behavior of z (t), z0An initial vector value of z (t);
control quantity u (t) ∈ RmInput vector for controlled process, y (t) ∈ RmOutputting a vector for the controlled process, m and n representing the dimensions of the vector;
f(xDz, t) is an unknown function expressing the nonlinear dynamic characteristics of the object; coefficient matrix AD,BD,CDRepresenting the desired dynamic characteristics of a stable closed loop system, D being the outputA coefficient matrix is obtained;
step 1-2: desired dynamic characteristics A described according to step 1-1D,BD,CDDefining a desired reference system with dead time lag, described by the following state space equations:
wherein,in order for the reference state vector to be undetectable,is composed of1, …, n;
xdes(t)=[xdes,1(t),…,xdes,n(t)]∈Rnis a pure time-lagged reference state vector, the component x of whichdes,i(T) has a pure time lag Tdi≥0,i=1,…,n;
ydes(t)∈RmIs a reference output vector; coefficient matrixr(t)∈RmInputting a vector for a given bounded reference;
step 1-3: desired dynamic characteristics A described according to step 1-1D,BD,CDDefining the state estimator as:
wherein the state vector estimatorAnd output vector estimatorEstimates of a measurable state vector x (t) and an output vector y (t) of the controlled object, respectively,is an uncertainty estimator of the system, x0Also is thatThe initial vector value of (a), the control quantity u (t) ∈ RmAlso the input vector to the state estimator.
3. A dual feedback robust adaptive control method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that: the step 1 also comprises steps 1-4: in order to realize the double-feedback strategy of the invention, a built-in dynamic dead time lag model of a controlled object is added in the double-feedback robust self-adaptive controller, and the built-in dynamic dead time lag model consists of a dead time lag-free dynamic model and a dead time lag model.
4. A dual feedback robust adaptive control method according to claim 3, characterized in that: the built-in dynamic dead time lag model can be described as a dead time lag-free dynamic model and a dead time lag model; a dynamic model without dead time lag can be described in the form of the following equation of state:
wherein,for a state vector without a pure time lag,is composed of1, …, n; a. them、BmIs a matrix of coefficients, x0Is composed ofThe initial vector value of (a), the control quantity u (t) ∈ RmAn input vector of a built-in dynamic dead time lag model;
the pure time lag model can be described in the form of the following pure time lag equation and output equation:
wherein the input quantity of the dead time lag model is a state vector component without dead time lagi=1,…,n;
Is a state vector with dead time lag, its componentsWith dead time Tmi≥0,i=1,…,n;Output vector, C, for a built-in dynamic dead-time modelm、DmIs a matrix of coefficients.
5. A dual feedback robust adaptive control method according to claim 1, 2 or 4, wherein: to implement step 2, a state prediction bias is calculated based on the dual feedback state vectorThe method comprises the following steps:
step 2-1: calculating the inner loop feedback deviation
Wherein,is the state vector of the state estimator,the state vector is a state vector without dead time lag of a built-in dynamic dead time lag model;
step 2-2: calculating an outer loop feedback offset
Wherein,the state vector with dead time lag is a built-in dynamic dead time lag model, and x (t) is a measurable state vector of a controlled process;
step 2-3: calculating a state prediction biasThe feedback error is obtained by adding the inner loop feedback error and the outer loop feedback error.
6. The dual feedback robust adaptive control method according to claim 5, wherein: to implement step 3, the states are predicted to be biasedInputting the adaptive law, calculating the uncertainty estimatorAdaptive law for predicting deviations from stateAs input, with an uncertainty estimatorThe following piecewise linear function for the output:
wherein,
t >0 denotes the sampling period and i denotes the sampling sequence number.
7. The dual feedback robust adaptive control method according to claim 6, wherein: in the step 4, the control quantity u (t) is generated by the following control law:
u(t)=L-1[u(s)], (11)
wherein the coefficient matrix
F(s) is a low pass filter with a steady state gain of 1, s is the Laplace transform operator, r(s) anda bounded reference input vector r (t) and an uncertainty estimator, respectivelyOf laplace transform, L-1[·]Representing an inverse laplace transform.
8. The control system architecture for a dual feedback robust adaptive control method as claimed in claim 1, wherein: the system comprises a control law, a dead time lag-free dynamic model, a dead time lag model, a state estimator, a first adder for forming an inner loop feedback deviation signal, a second adder for forming an outer loop feedback deviation signal, a third adder for forming a state prediction deviation signal, an adaptive law module and a low-pass filter; the input end of the control law inputs an input signal, the output signal of the control law is simultaneously sent to a controlled object, a dead time-lag-free dynamic model and a state estimator, the controlled object is driven by the output signal of the control law, the output end of the controlled object outputs a measurable state signal, one path of the output signal of the dead time-lag-free dynamic model is sent to the input end of the dead time-lag model, the other path of the output signal of the dead time-lag-free dynamic model is sent to a first adder, the output signal of the dead time model and the measurable state signal are sent to a second adder to obtain and output an outer loop feedback deviation signal, the control quantity signal output by the control law and the output signal of the adaptive law module are used as input signals to enter the state estimator, the output signal of the state estimator is sent to the first adder to output an inner loop feedback deviation signal, the inner loop feedback deviation signal output by the first adder and the outer loop feedback deviation signal output by the second The state prediction deviation signal is sent to an adaptive law module, one path of the output end of the adaptive law module is sent to a state estimator, the other path of the output end of the adaptive law module enters a control law through a low-pass filter connected with the adaptive law module in series, and the input signal of the control law also comprises a bounded reference input signal.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710030878.3A CN106773712B (en) | 2017-01-17 | 2017-01-17 | Double feedback robust self-adaptation control methods and its Control system architecture |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710030878.3A CN106773712B (en) | 2017-01-17 | 2017-01-17 | Double feedback robust self-adaptation control methods and its Control system architecture |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN106773712A true CN106773712A (en) | 2017-05-31 |
CN106773712B CN106773712B (en) | 2019-11-12 |
Family
ID=58945770
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710030878.3A Active CN106773712B (en) | 2017-01-17 | 2017-01-17 | Double feedback robust self-adaptation control methods and its Control system architecture |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN106773712B (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107490961A (en) * | 2017-07-26 | 2017-12-19 | 东华大学 | A kind of controller for being used to control the double circle structure of unstable plus time delay processes |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103322553A (en) * | 2013-07-04 | 2013-09-25 | 东南大学 | Multi-model disturbance estimation predictive-control method for superheated steam temperature of thermal power generating unit |
CN204013883U (en) * | 2014-07-10 | 2014-12-10 | 公安部第一研究所 | A kind of bimodulus bi-feedback adaptive Target Tracking System and control circuit |
CN104656448A (en) * | 2015-01-16 | 2015-05-27 | 东南大学 | Predictive control method for supercritical set based on decoupling and disturbance observation |
-
2017
- 2017-01-17 CN CN201710030878.3A patent/CN106773712B/en active Active
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103322553A (en) * | 2013-07-04 | 2013-09-25 | 东南大学 | Multi-model disturbance estimation predictive-control method for superheated steam temperature of thermal power generating unit |
CN204013883U (en) * | 2014-07-10 | 2014-12-10 | 公安部第一研究所 | A kind of bimodulus bi-feedback adaptive Target Tracking System and control circuit |
CN104656448A (en) * | 2015-01-16 | 2015-05-27 | 东南大学 | Predictive control method for supercritical set based on decoupling and disturbance observation |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
LEI PAN.ETC: "L 1 adaptive control for improving load-following capability of nonlinear boiler–turbine units in the presence of unknown uncertainties", 《SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY》 * |
冯谦: "超临界机组特性建模与协调控制系统优化", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库》 * |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107490961A (en) * | 2017-07-26 | 2017-12-19 | 东华大学 | A kind of controller for being used to control the double circle structure of unstable plus time delay processes |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN106773712B (en) | 2019-11-12 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Ye et al. | Position control of nonlinear hydraulic system using an improved PSO based PID controller | |
Liu et al. | Nonlinear fuzzy model predictive iterative learning control for drum-type boiler–turbine system | |
Wu et al. | Data-driven modeling and predictive control for boiler–turbine unit | |
Tan et al. | Analysis and control of a nonlinear boiler-turbine unit | |
Li et al. | Offset-free fuzzy model predictive control of a boiler–turbine system based on genetic algorithm | |
Luo et al. | Data-driven predictive control of Hammerstein–Wiener systems based on subspace identification | |
CN103406909B (en) | Tracking control device and method of mechanical arm system | |
Zhou et al. | RBF-ARX model-based MPC strategies with application to a water tank system | |
Malhotra et al. | Boiler flow control using PID and fuzzy logic controller | |
Prasad et al. | Plant-wide predictive control for a thermal power plant based on a physical plant model | |
CN103322553A (en) | Multi-model disturbance estimation predictive-control method for superheated steam temperature of thermal power generating unit | |
CN106292277A (en) | Subcritical fired power generating unit control method for coordinating based on total-sliding-mode control | |
Yang et al. | A genuine nonlinear approach for controller design of a boiler–turbine system | |
Kergus et al. | Frequency-domain data-driven control design in the Loewner framework | |
CN110737198B (en) | Large-scale coal-fired power plant CO based on BP neural network 2 Capture system prediction control method | |
Chertovskikh et al. | An adaptive PID controller with an online auto-tuning by a pretrained neural network | |
CN102393645A (en) | Control method of high-speed electro-hydraulic proportional governing system | |
Yang et al. | Parameter self-tuning of SISO compact-form model-free adaptive controller based on long short-term memory neural network | |
Zhou et al. | RBF-ARX model-based robust MPC for nonlinear systems with unknown and bounded disturbance | |
Mugweni et al. | Neural networks-based process model and its integration with conventional drum level PID control in a steam boiler plant | |
CN106773712B (en) | Double feedback robust self-adaptation control methods and its Control system architecture | |
CN111880470B (en) | Buffeting-free sliding mode control method of piezoelectric driving micro-positioning platform | |
JP2018055169A (en) | State prediction device | |
Tudoroiu et al. | Modelling, identification, implementation and MATLAB simulations of multi-input multi-output proportional integral-plus control strategies for a centrifugal chiller system | |
Sun et al. | System identification for nonlinear FOPDT model with input-dependent dead-time |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |