CN106682809A - Enterprise BIM technology application capability quantification assessment method - Google Patents
Enterprise BIM technology application capability quantification assessment method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106682809A CN106682809A CN201611007538.0A CN201611007538A CN106682809A CN 106682809 A CN106682809 A CN 106682809A CN 201611007538 A CN201611007538 A CN 201611007538A CN 106682809 A CN106682809 A CN 106682809A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- enterprise
- bim
- questionnaire
- key element
- factor
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 107
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 23
- 238000011002 quantification Methods 0.000 title abstract 4
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 56
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims description 41
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims description 23
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 claims description 18
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000013439 planning Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000013332 literature search Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000011158 quantitative evaluation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010561 standard procedure Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 2
- 241000936936 Opitutaceae Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000002946 Total quality control Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012141 concentrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000354 decomposition reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005192 partition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000750 progressive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012800 visualization Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0637—Strategic management or analysis, e.g. setting a goal or target of an organisation; Planning actions based on goals; Analysis or evaluation of effectiveness of goals
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/08—Construction
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides an enterprise BIM technology application capability quantification assessment method. The invention discloses an enterprise Building Information Modeling technology application capability assessment method. The method includes the following steps: defining the concept of enterprise BIM application capability; selecting and classifying impact factors of the enterprise BIM application capability; setting the weight of each impact factor; classifying levels of each impact factor; applying an enterprise BIM technology application capability assessment; and dividing the development stages of the enterprise BIM application capability. According to the invention, the method addresses the difficulty of quantification assessment of the enterprise BIM application capability by achieving the quantification assessment of the enterprise BIM application capability and provides accurate and objective assessment result and by providing a sustainable development route for the enterprise BIM application capability.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to building engineering field, more particularly to a kind of enterprise B IM technical application ability quantitative estimation method.
Background technology
BIM (Building Information Modeling, abbreviation BIM) is in recent years in computer aided manufacturing
The new technology for helping architectural design field to occur, it is the base using every relevant information data of construction-engineering project as model
Plinth, sets up complete, highly integrated construction-engineering project informationization model, so as in Building Engineering Design, construction and management
Etc. in whole life cycle, informationization, the integration degree of architectural engineering is improved.
The BIM technology application power for evaluating enterprise depends on BIM technology application power appraisement system and Capability Maturity Model, mesh
The front assessment for BIM is main concentrates the satisfaction evaluated based on the project of BIM to weigh, the BIM rates of return on investment of enterprise are commented
Valency and BIM using and BIM Performance Evaluation developing direction research, into system enterprise B IM application power appraisal procedure not yet
Formed.
Applications of the BIM in Practical Project is one and deepens continuously and continuous ripe process, developed at home in recent years
Rapidly, each large enterprises focus on the construction of itself BIM application power very much, but the influence factor for BIM application powers and its
Criterion is a unsolved problem always, thus causes enterprise B IM application power development neither one clearly side
To the evaluation to enterprise B IM application power also lacks a criterion, for each participant of project, selects in the project
Suitable BIM embodiment party causes certain impact.
The content of the invention
It is an object of the invention to provide a kind of enterprise B IM technical application ability quantitative estimation method, can realize enterprise
The quantitative evaluation of BIM application powers, evaluation result is more accurate, objective.
To solve the above problems, the present invention provides a kind of enterprise B IM technical application ability quantitative estimation method, including：
The enterprise B IM application power concept of appraisal procedure is set up by literature search, comprehensive analysis；
The initial data of various key elements is obtained by way of literature research, survey, expert interviewing, each key element is entered
Row screening is comprehensive, and the theory according to Modern administrology is divided into technical capability, process capability, three big class of strategic capability；
Using currently for the conventional analytic hierarchy process (AHP) of multiple target, many element questions, adopting said method designs special tune
Volume is interrogated, this questionnaire is completed by the expert of association area, then one by one level carries out consistency analysis for questionnaire result, to one
The questionnaire that the analysis of cause property passes through determines the weight of each influent factor again with analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
Each key element development is divided into several significant processes, the evolution to each key element carries out grade stroke
Point, the lowest class is the starting stage, and highest ranking is the highest level that the key element should reach under theory state, indicates certain
Key element is from just setting the process that develops successively to high level；
From overall process, full tissue, the comprehensive BIM application powers evaluation method of three Level buildings of total factor, having built up
On the basis of the influencing factor system of enterprise B IM technical application ability evaluation system, and the weight of each factor for determining, to each
Factor has carried out the refinement of substantially 10 ranks, sets up the Mathematical Modeling of a BIM application power project evaluation chain；
The first dimension in BIM organization and administration Capability Maturity Models is chosen in the development of enterprise B IM technical application ability, enterprise
Industry BIM technology application power is in turn divided into as Preliminary Applications stage, the stage of growth, raising stage, the stage of ripeness and continues
Five grades of raising stage, stages can be with each rank tool of the first dimension in BIM organization and administration Capability Maturity Models
There is corresponding relation.
Further, in the above-mentioned methods, it is divided into technical capability, process capability, strategy according to the theory of Modern administrology
Three big class of ability, including：Technical capability, process capability, strategic capability have been obtained after classification in interior three major types totally ten
One key element.
Further, in the above-mentioned methods, from overall process, full tissue, the comprehensive BIM applications energy of three Level buildings of total factor
Power evaluation method, in the influencing factor system for having built up enterprise B IM technical application ability evaluation system, and each factor for determining
Weight on the basis of, the refinement of substantially 10 ranks has been carried out to each factor, set up a BIM application power project evaluation chain
Mathematical Modeling, including：
The various key element construction situations of enterprise B IM and key element hierarchical table are compared, the corresponding rank of individual event factor is chosen,
With the integration that the rank and the key element multiplied by weight obtain single index, the integration of indices is added, as enterprise B IM
The TOP SCORES of technical application ability,
Represented with Mathematical Modeling as：Enterprise B IM application power integration=∑ element level * key element weight.
Further, in the above-mentioned methods, using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) commonly used currently for multiple target, many element questions,
Adopting said method designs special questionnaire, and by the expert of association area this questionnaire is completed, then for questionnaire result one by one
Level carries out consistency analysis, and the questionnaire passed through to consistency analysis uses again analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and then determines each influent factor
Weight, including：
AHP Model destination layer is enterprise B IM application power appraisement system, and datum layer is technical field, process neck
Domain, strategic three, field one-level key element, indicator layer is each two-stage elements；
Questionnaire design is carried out, investigated person is compared two-by-two influent factor importance in same level, yardstick is drawn
It is divided into nine grades；
Consistency analysis are carried out in the questionnaire result to multiple experts, selection uses level by the sample of consistency analysis
Analytic approach, finally determines each key element weight.
Further, in the above-mentioned methods, questionnaire is filled in by AHP Model description, questionnaire in the questionnaire design
Illustrate, the part of questionnaire content three constitutes.
Further, in the above-mentioned methods, consistency analysis are carried out in the questionnaire result to multiple experts, chooses and pass through one
The sample of cause property analysis uses analytic hierarchy process (AHP), finally determines each key element weight, including：
After finding is obtained, result is analyzed with analytic hierarchy process (AHP) professional software, through following steps：
Analysis model is set up in DAS according to the AHP Model of above-mentioned structure；
The correctness of "current" model is checked in operation " inspection "current" model ", if prompting outlet mistake, according to accordingly carrying
Show adjustment model, till correctness passes through；
In investigational data one by one input model, and the uniformity of data is verified, give up the unsanctioned data of uniformity, selected
Take the data for having passed through to be analyzed；
Consistency analysis are carried out in the questionnaire result to multiple experts, selection uses level by the sample of consistency analysis
Analytic approach, finally determines each key element weight.
Further, in the above-mentioned methods, the overall process refers to application of the BIM technology in building full lifetime, covers rule
Draw, design, construct, run, transform and remove six Main Stages.
Further, in the above-mentioned methods, the full tissue refers to the main body that BIM applications are participated in the building lifetime, including
Government department, owner, designing unit, unit in charge of construction, property department and supplier.
Further, in the above-mentioned methods, the total factor refers to 3D geometrical models, quality, progress, cost and personnel five
Key element.
Compared with prior art, the invention discloses a kind of enterprise's BIM (BIM) technical application ability is commented
Estimate method, main contents include enterprise B IM application power concept defining；Enterprise B IM application power influent factor is chosen and is sorted out；
The setting of each influent factor weight；Each element level subdivision；Enterprise B IM technical application ability assessment models；Enterprise B IM application energy
Power developing stage is divided.The present invention solves the problems, such as that enterprise B IM application power is difficult to quantitative evaluation：On the one hand enterprise is realized
The quantitative evaluation of BIM application powers, evaluation result is more accurate, objective；On the other hand a kind of enterprise B IM application power is provided
Sustainable development approach.
Description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is the workflow diagram of the enterprise B IM technical application ability quantitative estimation method of one embodiment of the invention；
Fig. 2 is the evaluation system influence factor structural model of one embodiment of the invention.
Specific embodiment
It is understandable to enable the above objects, features and advantages of the present invention to become apparent from, it is below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and concrete real
The present invention is further detailed explanation to apply mode.
As shown in figure 1, the present invention provides a kind of enterprise B IM technical application ability quantitative estimation method, including：
Step S1, enterprise B IM application power concept defining 1：The master of appraisal procedure is set up by literature search, comprehensive analysis
Concept is wanted, in the method, mainly the main concepts such as BIM, BIM technology application power is bound；BIM is a kind of for creating
The modeling technique and its flow process of architecture information are built, exchange, analyzing, using construction-engineering project relevant information data as model base
Plinth, carries out the foundation of BUILDINGS MODELS, is the digital expression of Architecural Physics and functional characteristic, and it has visualization, harmony, mould
Intend property, optimization property, the big feature of figure five can be gone out；Enterprise B IM technical application ability be enterprise using BIM technology and business event and
The ability that the construction project for being participated in combines, is created with information and information sharing is as core, is that constructional enterprises surround information
Transmission and information synergism, using BIM be managed with operation etc. integration capability concentrated reflection and embodiment；
Step S2, enterprise B IM application power influent factor chooses and sorts out 2：Influent factor be it is various connect each other will
The organic whole that element is constituted, is to realize the decomposition that a certain target is carried out by certain rule, setting up research object each
Individual aspect interdependence and the mutually relation of restriction；According to specific aim, operability, comprehensive principle, with literature research,
The various ways such as survey, expert interviewing obtain the initial data of various key elements, and screening is carried out to each key element comprehensively, and according to
The theory of Modern administrology is divided into technical capability, process capability, three big class of strategic capability, enterprise B IM application energy in the present invention
Power influent factor is obtained through various ways such as literature research, survey, expert interviewings, it is ensured that each key element it is comprehensive,
Objectivity；After the initial data for obtaining each key element, various key elements are screened, integrated, using Modern Enterprise Administration
Theory, is sorted out all key elements by technical field, process area, strategic field；Specifically, skill has been obtained after classification
Enterprise is sorted out and its be described as follows to art ability, process capability, strategic capability in interior three major types totally ten one key elements, each key element
Shown in BIM application power influent factor tables.
Step S3, the setting 3 of each influent factor weight：The weight of each influent factor has important work in this appraisal procedure
With in order to ensure the accuracy of weight, present invention employs currently for the conventional analytic hierarchy process (AHP) of multiple target, many element questions
(AHP), adopting said method devises special questionnaire, and by the authoritative expert of association area this questionnaire is completed, then is directed to
One by one level carries out consistency analysis to questionnaire result, and the questionnaire passed through to consistency analysis uses again analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and then really
The weight of fixed each influent factor；
Step S4, each element level subdivision 4：The development of enterprise B IM application power is a process for progressively developing, a rank
Section be subjected to some significant processes to next stage development, need each key element to step up；Each key element is sent out
Exhibition is divided into several significant processes, and the evolution to each key element carries out grade classification, and the lowest class is the starting stage,
Highest ranking is the highest level that the key element should reach under theory state, indicates certain key element from just setting to high level successively
The process of development；
Step S5, enterprise B IM technical application ability assessment models 5：The present invention to BIM correlation theories and is being related to factor and is entering
On the basis of row analysis is sorted out, absorb " comprehensive theory " in total quality control, from overall process, full tissue, total factor three
The comprehensive BIM application powers evaluation method of individual Level building；Overall process BIM technology application refers to BIM technology in building full lifetime
Using, cover planning, design, construction, operation, transformation and remove six Main Stages；The BIM technology application of full tissue refers to building life
The main body of BIM applications is participated in the life phase, mainly there is government department, owner, designing unit, unit in charge of construction, property department and supply
Business etc.；Total factor refers mainly to five key elements such as 3D geometrical models, quality, progress, cost and personnel；According to the Establishing
BIM application Capability Maturity Models, model establishes maturity assessment index system and index ability method of discrimination, it is determined that maturity
The evaluation mode of rank, is finally applied for detailed programs to Capability Maturity Model；Enterprise is had built up in above-mentioned part
The influencing factor system of BIM technology application power evaluation system, and the weight of each factor for determining, have been carried out greatly to each factor
The refinement of 10 ranks is caused, the Mathematical Modeling of a BIM application power project evaluation chain is set up on the basis of several conditions more than；
Step S6, BIM application powers developing stage is divided：The BIM organization and administration that Australian researcher Succar sets up
Capability Maturity Model is made up of three dimensions, and the first dimension is maturity grade, is divided into initial level, definable level, management level, integrated
Level and optimization level；2nd dimension is construction project life cycle, third dimension is to include technological layer, process aspect, policy aspect
In interior BIM applicating evaluating indexs domain；BIM organization and administration maturity moulds are have chosen in the development of enterprise B IM technical application ability
The first dimension in type, is in the method in turn divided into enterprise B IM technical application ability for Preliminary Applications stage, growth rank
Section, raising stage, five grades of the stage of ripeness and constantly improve stage, stages can be ripe with BIM organization and administration
The first dimension each rank in degree model has corresponding relation.Specifically, enterprise B IM technical application ability grade classification, can
Such as following table：
The fraction up to standard of each rank should be able to be on the whole to be according to the aggregate level of assessment object come what is determined
The situation of an existing normal distribution, in order to realize a range of management and control, the fraction up to standard of each rank can also be in difference
Stage is adjusted according to BIM application power overall development levels.
In order that this appraisal procedure is more complete, it is assumed that the integration distribution of each grade is as follows：
In one embodiment of the invention, step S5, enterprise B IM technical application ability assessment models, including：
The various key element construction situations of enterprise B IM and key element hierarchical table are compared, the corresponding rank of individual event factor is chosen,
With the integration that the rank and the key element multiplied by weight obtain single index, the integration of indices is added, as enterprise B IM
The TOP SCORES of technical application ability,
Represented with Mathematical Modeling as：Enterprise B IM application power integration=∑ element level * key element weight.
In one embodiment of the invention, using currently for the conventional analytic hierarchy process (AHP) of multiple target, many element questions, this is applied
Method designs special questionnaire, and by the authoritative expert of association area this questionnaire is completed, then for questionnaire result layer one by one
Secondary to carry out consistency analysis, the questionnaire passed through to consistency analysis uses again analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and then determines each influent factor
Weight, including：
AHP Model is set up：One Analytic Hierarchy Process Model is made up of destination layer, datum layer, indicator layer, at this
Bright middle level fractional analysis simulated target layer be enterprise B IM application power appraisement system, datum layer be technical field, process area,
Three, strategic field one-level key element, indicator layer is each two-stage elements；Specifically, enterprise B IM application power evaluation system level
Analysis model such as following table：
Questionnaire design：Questionnaire investigation is analytic hierarchy process (AHP) usual way, needs investigated person in same level to affecting to want
Plain importance compares two-by-two, and yardstick is divided into nine grades, and such as A key elements and B, C, D compare successively relative importance such as
What；A.1 and A.2, A.3, how A.n compares relative importance successively, wherein 9,7,5,3,1 numerical value corresponds to respectively definitely weight
Will, particularly significant, important, somewhat important, no less important, 8,6,4,2 represent significance levels between two adjacent grades
Between, finding will be used to determine the weight of each key element, in order to ensure data accuracy, therefore, to assure that number of samples is sufficiently large
Or questionnaire is completed by the authoritative expert of association area；
Each key element weight：Consistency analysis are carried out in the questionnaire result to multiple experts, is chosen by consistency analysis
Sample uses analytic hierarchy process (AHP), finally determines each key element weight.
In one embodiment of the invention, questionnaire design：For this method Design hierarchy analytic approach questionnaire, questionnaire is by step analysis
The description of method model, questionnaire filling explanation, the part of questionnaire content three composition：
(1) problem description
This questionnaire uses layer to set up enterprise B IM application power appraisal procedure as target to its various factors
Fractional analysis is analyzed, hierarchical model below figure.Index descriptions such as Fig. 2 at different levels.
(2) questionnaire filling explanation
The purpose of this questionnaire is to determine relative weighting between each influence factor of enterprise B IM application power, and investigation is asked
Roll up the form design according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP) (AHP).Influence factor importance is compared two-by-two in same level, is weighed
Partition of the scale is 9 grades, wherein 9,7,5,3,1 numerical value correspond to respectively it is absolutely essential, particularly significant, important, somewhat
Important, no less important, 8,6,4,2 represent significance level between two adjacent grades.According to your BIM application experiences,
Hook is please made before relatively important factor, and selects the corresponding numerical grade of importance.
1. each key element of the following first order compares two-by-two, for " assessment of enterprise B IM application power " importance relatively how,
Please select.
| Technical capabilities | □1 | □2 | □3 | □4 | □5 | □6 | □7 | □8 | □9 | Process capabilities |
| Technical capabilities | □1 | □2 | □3 | □4 | □5 | □6 | □7 | □8 | □9 | Strategic capabilities |
| Strategic capabilities | □1 | □2 | □3 | □4 | □5 | □6 | □7 | □8 | □9 | Process capabilities |
2. following second level key element compares two-by-two, for " technical capability " importance relatively how, please select.
| Application dimensions | □1 | □2 | □3 | □4 | □5 | □6 | □7 | □8 | □9 | IT are supported |
3. following second level key element compares two-by-two, for " process capability " importance relatively how, please select.
Following second level key element compares two-by-two, for " strategic capability " importance relatively how, please select.
| Strategical plannings | □1 | □2 | □3 | □4 | □5 | □6 | □7 | □8 | □9 | Standard methods |
| Strategical plannings | □1 | □2 | □3 | □4 | □5 | □6 | □7 | □8 | □9 | The capacities of scientific research |
| Strategical plannings | □1 | □2 | □3 | □4 | □5 | □6 | □7 | □8 | □9 | Personnel trainings |
| Standard methods | □1 | □2 | □3 | □4 | □5 | □6 | □7 | □8 | □9 | The capacities of scientific research |
| Standard methods | □1 | □2 | □3 | □4 | □5 | □6 | □7 | □8 | □9 | Personnel trainings |
| The capacities of scientific research | □1 | □2 | □3 | □4 | □5 | □6 | □7 | □8 | □9 | Personnel trainings |
In one embodiment of the invention, each key element weight：After finding is obtained, with analytic hierarchy process (AHP) professional software to knot
Fruit is analyzed, through following steps：
(1) AHP Model is set up
Analysis model is set up in DAS according to the AHP Model of above-mentioned structure.
(2) inspection model
The correctness of "current" model is checked in operation " inspection "current" model ", if prompting outlet mistake, according to accordingly carrying
Show adjustment model, till correctness passes through.
(3) judgment matrix
In investigational data one by one input model, and the uniformity of data is verified, give up the unsanctioned data of uniformity, selected
Take the data for having passed through to be analyzed.
(4) each key element weight is calculated
Consistency analysis are carried out in the questionnaire result to multiple experts, selection uses level by the sample of consistency analysis
Analytic approach, and each sample arithmetic mean of instantaneous value is taken, finally determine normalized each key element weight, it is as shown in the table：
| Index | Weight | Index | Weight |
| Using dimension | 0.13 | Social benefit | 0.02 |
| IT is supported | 0.05 | Strategy orientation | 0.16 |
| Management platform | 0.10 | Standards system | 0.05 |
| Resources bank | 0.075 | The capacity of scientific research | 0.035 |
| Human resources | 0.19 | Personnel training | 0.14 |
| Economic benefit | 0.05 |
In sum, the invention discloses a kind of appraisal procedure of enterprise's BIM (BIM) technical application ability,
Main contents include enterprise B IM application power concept defining；Enterprise B IM application power influent factor is chosen and is sorted out；It is each to affect
The setting of key element weight；Each element level subdivision；Enterprise B IM technical application ability assessment models；Enterprise B IM application power develops
Divided stages.The present invention solves the problems, such as that enterprise B IM application power is difficult to quantitative evaluation：On the one hand realize that enterprise B IM is applied
The quantitative evaluation of ability, evaluation result is more accurate, objective；On the other hand persistently send out there is provided a kind of enterprise B IM application power
Exhibition approach.The present invention establishes enterprise B IM technical application ability progressively from perfect process, and each enterprise can be for assessment knot
Weak link in fruit proposes the behave that BIM technology application power is improved, and applies to construction unit, designing unit, work order
The BIM application power appraisal procedures of all kinds building enterprises such as position, consulting unit.
Each embodiment is described by the way of progressive in this specification, and what each embodiment was stressed is and other
The difference of embodiment, between each embodiment identical similar portion mutually referring to.
Professional further appreciates that, with reference to the unit of each example of the embodiments described herein description
And algorithm steps, can with electronic hardware, computer software or the two be implemented in combination in, in order to clearly demonstrate hardware and
The interchangeability of software, according to function has generally described the composition and step of each example in the above description.These
Function is performed with hardware or software mode actually, depending on the application-specific and design constraint of technical scheme.Specialty
Technical staff can use different methods to realize described function to each specific application, but this realization should not
Think beyond the scope of this invention.
Obviously, those skilled in the art can carry out the spirit of various changes and modification without deviating from the present invention to invention
And scope.So, if these modifications of the present invention and modification belong to the claims in the present invention and its equivalent technologies scope it
Interior, then the present invention is also intended to including including these changes and modification.
Claims (9)
1. a kind of enterprise B IM technical application ability quantitative estimation method, it is characterised in that include：
The enterprise B IM application power concept of appraisal procedure is set up by literature search, comprehensive analysis；
The initial data of various key elements is obtained by way of literature research, survey, expert interviewing, each key element is sieved
Choosing is comprehensive, and the theory according to Modern administrology is divided into technical capability, process capability, three big class of strategic capability；
Using currently for the conventional analytic hierarchy process (AHP) of multiple target, many element questions, adopting said method designs special investigation and asks
Volume, by the expert of association area this questionnaire is completed, then one by one level carries out consistency analysis for questionnaire result, to uniformity
The questionnaire that analysis passes through determines the weight of each influent factor again with analytic hierarchy process (AHP)；
Each key element development is divided into several significant processes, the evolution to each key element carries out grade classification, most
Inferior grade is the starting stage, and highest ranking is the highest level that the key element should reach under theory state, indicates certain key element
From just setting the process that develops successively to high level；
From overall process, full tissue, the comprehensive BIM application powers evaluation method of three Level buildings of total factor, enterprise is being had built up
On the basis of the influencing factor system of BIM technology application power evaluation system, and the weight of each factor for determining, to each factor
The refinement of substantially 10 ranks has been carried out, the Mathematical Modeling of a BIM application power project evaluation chain has been set up；
The first dimension in BIM organization and administration Capability Maturity Models is chosen in the development of enterprise B IM technical application ability, enterprise
BIM technology application power is in turn divided into as Preliminary Applications stage, the stage of growth, raising stage, the stage of ripeness and persistently carries
Five grades of high-stage, stages can and the first dimension each rank for organizing in Capability Maturity Model of BIM have
Corresponding relation.
2. enterprise B IM technical application ability quantitative estimation method as claimed in claim 1, it is characterised in that according to modern pipe
Theory of science is divided into technical capability, process capability, three big class of strategic capability, including：Technology energy has been obtained after classification
Power, process capability, strategic capability are in interior three major types totally ten one key elements.
3. enterprise B IM technical application ability quantitative estimation method as claimed in claim 1, it is characterised in that from overall process, complete
Tissue, the comprehensive BIM application powers evaluation method of three Level buildings of total factor, are having built up enterprise B IM technical application ability
On the basis of the influencing factor system of evaluation system, and the weight of each factor for determining, substantially 10 are carried out to each factor
The refinement of rank, sets up the Mathematical Modeling of a BIM application power project evaluation chain, including：
The various key element construction situations of enterprise B IM and key element hierarchical table are compared, the corresponding rank of individual event factor is chosen, with this
Rank and the key element multiplied by weight obtain the integration of single index, and the integration of indices is added, as the enterprise B IM technology
The TOP SCORES of application power,
Represented with Mathematical Modeling as：Enterprise B IM application power integration=∑ element level * key element weight.
4. enterprise B IM technical application ability quantitative estimation method as claimed in claim 1, it is characterised in that using current pin
The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) conventional to multiple target, many element questions, adopting said method designs special questionnaire, by association area
Expert completes this questionnaire, then one by one level carries out consistency analysis for questionnaire result, the questionnaire passed through to consistency analysis
Analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and then the weight of each influent factor of determination are used again, including：
AHP Model destination layer be enterprise B IM application power appraisement system, datum layer be technical field, process area,
Three, strategic field one-level key element, indicator layer is each two-stage elements；
Questionnaire design is carried out, investigated person is compared two-by-two influent factor importance in same level, yardstick is divided into
Nine grades；
Consistency analysis are carried out in the questionnaire result to multiple experts, selection uses step analysis by the sample of consistency analysis
Method, finally determines each key element weight.
5. enterprise B IM technical application ability quantitative estimation method as claimed in claim 4, it is characterised in that the questionnaire sets
Questionnaire is made up of AHP Model description, questionnaire filling explanation, the part of questionnaire content three in meter.
6. enterprise B IM technical application ability quantitative estimation method as claimed in claim 4, it is characterised in that to it is multiple specially
The questionnaire result of family carries out consistency analysis, and selection uses analytic hierarchy process (AHP) by the sample of consistency analysis, final to determine respectively
Key element weight, including：
After finding is obtained, result is analyzed with analytic hierarchy process (AHP) professional software, through following steps：
Analysis model is set up in DAS according to the AHP Model of above-mentioned structure；
The correctness of "current" model is checked in operation " inspection "current" model ", if prompting outlet mistake, is adjusted according to corresponding prompting
Integral mould, till correctness passes through；
In investigational data one by one input model, and the uniformity of data is verified, give up the unsanctioned data of uniformity, chosen
The data for passing through are analyzed；
Consistency analysis are carried out in the questionnaire result to multiple experts, selection uses step analysis by the sample of consistency analysis
Method, finally determines each key element weight.
7. enterprise B IM technical application ability quantitative estimation method as claimed in claim 1, it is characterised in that the overall process
Refer to application of the BIM technology in building full lifetime, cover planning, design, construction, operation, transformation and remove six Main Stages.
8. enterprise B IM technical application ability quantitative estimation method as claimed in claim 1, it is characterised in that the full tissue
Refer to the main body that BIM applications are participated in the building lifetime, including government department, owner, designing unit, unit in charge of construction, property department
And supplier.
9. enterprise B IM technical application ability quantitative estimation method as claimed in claim 1, it is characterised in that the total factor
Refer to 3D geometrical models, quality, progress, five key elements of cost and personnel.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201611007538.0A CN106682809A (en) | 2016-11-16 | 2016-11-16 | Enterprise BIM technology application capability quantification assessment method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201611007538.0A CN106682809A (en) | 2016-11-16 | 2016-11-16 | Enterprise BIM technology application capability quantification assessment method |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN106682809A true CN106682809A (en) | 2017-05-17 |
Family
ID=58839473
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201611007538.0A Pending CN106682809A (en) | 2016-11-16 | 2016-11-16 | Enterprise BIM technology application capability quantification assessment method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN106682809A (en) |
Cited By (14)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107463712A (en) * | 2017-08-23 | 2017-12-12 | 上海中信信息发展股份有限公司 | File format usability evaluation method and device |
| CN107545056A (en) * | 2017-05-27 | 2018-01-05 | 中科钢研节能科技有限公司 | A kind of new technology potentiality information analysis system and information analysis method |
| CN107562605A (en) * | 2017-05-27 | 2018-01-09 | 中科钢研节能科技有限公司 | The information authentication system and Information Authentication method of a kind of New Product |
| CN107688969A (en) * | 2017-08-25 | 2018-02-13 | 中科钢研节能科技有限公司 | A kind of New Product research and development management information system and management information method |
| CN108304655A (en) * | 2018-02-01 | 2018-07-20 | 华北水利水电大学 | The quantitative assessment of design software of structure course and degree of reaching computational methods and system |
| CN109272163A (en) * | 2018-09-25 | 2019-01-25 | 佛山市珠三角民营企业发展研究中心 | A kind of enterprise's gene diagnosis system |
| CN109784749A (en) * | 2019-01-28 | 2019-05-21 | 上海建科工程咨询有限公司 | One kind carrying out BIM application quantification Valuation Method and system based on VETS |
| CN109816228A (en) * | 2019-01-16 | 2019-05-28 | 徐州工业职业技术学院 | A kind of enterprise B IM technical application ability quantitative evaluation system and method |
| CN110163460A (en) * | 2018-03-30 | 2019-08-23 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | A kind of method and apparatus determined using score value |
| CN110188024A (en) * | 2019-05-30 | 2019-08-30 | 普元信息技术股份有限公司 | The system and method for data managing capacity assessment are realized under big data environment |
| CN110689280A (en) * | 2019-10-12 | 2020-01-14 | 国网河南省电力公司信息通信公司 | Data management capability self-evaluation system and method |
| CN111563673A (en) * | 2020-04-28 | 2020-08-21 | 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 | Computer technology digitization degree evaluation method and device |
| CN111582692A (en) * | 2020-04-28 | 2020-08-25 | 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 | IT and strategic business matching degree evaluation method and device |
| CN116069834A (en) * | 2023-03-07 | 2023-05-05 | 武汉东方赛思软件股份有限公司 | BIM technology-based enterprise data visual management method |
-
2016
- 2016-11-16 CN CN201611007538.0A patent/CN106682809A/en active Pending
Cited By (18)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107545056A (en) * | 2017-05-27 | 2018-01-05 | 中科钢研节能科技有限公司 | A kind of new technology potentiality information analysis system and information analysis method |
| CN107562605A (en) * | 2017-05-27 | 2018-01-09 | 中科钢研节能科技有限公司 | The information authentication system and Information Authentication method of a kind of New Product |
| CN107562605B (en) * | 2017-05-27 | 2021-06-11 | 中科钢研节能科技有限公司 | Information verification system and information verification method for new technology product |
| CN107545056B (en) * | 2017-05-27 | 2020-08-28 | 中科钢研节能科技有限公司 | New technology potential information analysis system and information analysis method |
| CN107463712A (en) * | 2017-08-23 | 2017-12-12 | 上海中信信息发展股份有限公司 | File format usability evaluation method and device |
| CN107688969A (en) * | 2017-08-25 | 2018-02-13 | 中科钢研节能科技有限公司 | A kind of New Product research and development management information system and management information method |
| CN108304655A (en) * | 2018-02-01 | 2018-07-20 | 华北水利水电大学 | The quantitative assessment of design software of structure course and degree of reaching computational methods and system |
| CN108304655B (en) * | 2018-02-01 | 2021-10-01 | 华北水利水电大学 | Building structure design software course quantitative evaluation and achievement calculation method and system |
| CN110163460A (en) * | 2018-03-30 | 2019-08-23 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | A kind of method and apparatus determined using score value |
| CN110163460B (en) * | 2018-03-30 | 2023-09-19 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | Method and equipment for determining application score |
| CN109272163A (en) * | 2018-09-25 | 2019-01-25 | 佛山市珠三角民营企业发展研究中心 | A kind of enterprise's gene diagnosis system |
| CN109816228A (en) * | 2019-01-16 | 2019-05-28 | 徐州工业职业技术学院 | A kind of enterprise B IM technical application ability quantitative evaluation system and method |
| CN109784749A (en) * | 2019-01-28 | 2019-05-21 | 上海建科工程咨询有限公司 | One kind carrying out BIM application quantification Valuation Method and system based on VETS |
| CN110188024A (en) * | 2019-05-30 | 2019-08-30 | 普元信息技术股份有限公司 | The system and method for data managing capacity assessment are realized under big data environment |
| CN110689280A (en) * | 2019-10-12 | 2020-01-14 | 国网河南省电力公司信息通信公司 | Data management capability self-evaluation system and method |
| CN111563673A (en) * | 2020-04-28 | 2020-08-21 | 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 | Computer technology digitization degree evaluation method and device |
| CN111582692A (en) * | 2020-04-28 | 2020-08-25 | 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 | IT and strategic business matching degree evaluation method and device |
| CN116069834A (en) * | 2023-03-07 | 2023-05-05 | 武汉东方赛思软件股份有限公司 | BIM technology-based enterprise data visual management method |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN106682809A (en) | Enterprise BIM technology application capability quantification assessment method | |
| Torkayesh et al. | An integrated BWM-LBWA-CoCoSo framework for evaluation of healthcare sectors in Eastern Europe | |
| Gao et al. | Consolidating SWOT analysis with nonhomogeneous uncertain preference information | |
| An et al. | Target intermediate products setting in a two-stage system with fairness concern | |
| Johnes et al. | Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher education institutions using data envelopment analysis | |
| CN103632203B (en) | A kind of power distribution network division of the power supply area method based on overall merit | |
| Abu Dabous et al. | Decision support method for multi‐criteria selection of bridge rehabilitation strategy | |
| Omrani et al. | Incorporating decision makers’ preferences into DEA and common weight DEA models based on the best–worst method (BWM) | |
| Stopka et al. | Identification of appropriate methods for allocation tasks of logistics objects in a certain area | |
| Dai et al. | Modeling change-pattern-value dynamics on land use: an integrated GIS and artificial neural networks approach | |
| CN104299067A (en) | Quantifiable enterprise development situation evaluation model | |
| Do et al. | AHP-based evaluation model for optimal selection process of patching materials for concrete repair: focused on quantitative requirements | |
| Wu | Grey relational analysis method for group decision making in credit risk analysis | |
| CN110751378A (en) | Nuclear facility decommissioning scheme evaluation method and system | |
| CN108647869A (en) | Engineering Assessment Method and device | |
| Arukala et al. | Evaluation of sustainable performance indicators for the built environment using AHP approach | |
| Cabeça et al. | A multicriteria classification approach for assessing the current governance capacities on energy efficiency in the European Union | |
| Raut et al. | A new strategic approach of fuzzy-quality function deployment and analytical hierarchy process in construction industry | |
| Alias et al. | Consistent fuzzy preference relation with geometric Bonferroni mean: a fused preference method for assessing the quality of life | |
| Li et al. | Owner-based benefit evaluation of BIM applications in China's engineering projects | |
| CN107256461A (en) | A kind of electrically-charging equipment builds address evaluation method and system | |
| CN110750572A (en) | Adaptive method and device for heuristic evaluation of scientific and technological achievements | |
| Xu et al. | Cross-efficiency evaluation method for non-homogeneous parallel network systems with imprecise data | |
| Wang et al. | A fuzzy DEA–Neural approach to measuring design service performance in PCM projects | |
| Cheng et al. | Analyzing relationships between project team compositions and green building certification in green building projects |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20170517 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |