CN106651861A - Method for automatically and optimally selecting remote sensing image segmentation parameters based on regional inconsistency evaluation - Google Patents

Method for automatically and optimally selecting remote sensing image segmentation parameters based on regional inconsistency evaluation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN106651861A
CN106651861A CN201611005687.3A CN201611005687A CN106651861A CN 106651861 A CN106651861 A CN 106651861A CN 201611005687 A CN201611005687 A CN 201611005687A CN 106651861 A CN106651861 A CN 106651861A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
parameter
scale
value
segmentation
move
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201611005687.3A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN106651861B (en
Inventor
张寅丹
刘勇
王苗苗
黄哲
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Lanzhou University
Original Assignee
Lanzhou University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Lanzhou University filed Critical Lanzhou University
Priority to CN201611005687.3A priority Critical patent/CN106651861B/en
Publication of CN106651861A publication Critical patent/CN106651861A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN106651861B publication Critical patent/CN106651861B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/10Image acquisition modality
    • G06T2207/10032Satellite or aerial image; Remote sensing

Landscapes

  • Image Analysis (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for automatically and optimally selecting remote sensing image segmentation parameters based on regional inconsistency evaluation. A segmentation data set is constructed in turn based on five groups of equidistant scale parameters and fixed shape factors and compactness factors, then an ED2 array is obtained from the segmentation data set and a corresponding reference data set based on PSE-NSR-ED2 inconsistency segmentation parameter evaluation system, the distribution mode of the five values of the ED2 array changing along with the scale parameters is analyzed, constant iteration is performed through transformation of the five scale parameters until the minimum ED2 value of the bottom part of an oblique U-shaped ED2-SP curve is found, and the scale parameters corresponding to the minimum ED2 value are the optimal scale parameters; and finally constant iteration of the process is performed on the basis of different combinations of the shape factors and the compactness factors. Blindness of parameter selection can be avoided so that the uncertainty caused by a trial-and-error method and time consumption caused by a method of exhaustion can be solved, and the accuracy and the degree of automation of object-oriented remote sensing image processing and analysis can also be enhanced.

Description

The preferably method of Remote Sensing Image Segmentation parameter is evaluated automatically based on region inconsistency
Technical field
The invention belongs to the side such as space statistical analysis and pattern-recognition is learned on geoscience research field, more particularly to remote sensing ground Face, and in particular to the preferably method of Remote Sensing Image Segmentation parameter is evaluated automatically based on region inconsistency.
Background technology
In remote sensing fields, for different application and purpose, different image segmentation algorithms are constantly suggested, and multiresolution The appearance of segmentation (Multiresolution Segmentation) algorithm a, it is considered to be mileage of Remote Sensing Image Segmentation Upright stone tablet.The algorithm combines the spectral information and spatial information of image in Image Segmentation, can produce internal homogeney highest shadow As object, the various combination that its major parameter has yardstick, form factor, the compactness factor, these parameters can produce different dividing Cut result.The process for selecting top-quality segmentation result is referred to as parameter preferably, and parameter preferably has to the problem for solving It is the concrete evaluation to splitting quality.Therefore, optimum segmentation parameter combination how is obtained to evaluate Image Segmentation quality be OBIA In a problem must solving.
Inconsistency segmentation result evaluation method is based on reference to polygon (Reference Polygon) and corresponding matching Split the inconsistency (Discrepancy) between polygon (Corresponding Polygon) to measure parameter current group The quality of the partition data produced by closing.It is a kind of objectively empirical evaluation method (Empirical Method), and it is With geometry inconsistency tolerance is to refer to polygon and the difference for matching area between polygon, and arithmetic inconsistency is measured Be both polygon quantity difference.
In inconsistency appraisement system (Potential Segmentation Error, PSE-Number-of- Segments Ratio, NSR-Euclidean Distance 2, ED2) in, PSE is potential segmentation area of error ratio, and NSR is Segmentation polygon quantity ratio, ED2 is the Euclidean distance of PSE and NSR.Oblique U-shaped (Euclidean Distance2, ED2- Scale Patterns, SP) pattern is based on to PSE-SP, what the analysis of NSR-SP, ED2-SP curve was proposed.In given shape In the case of shape, compactness parameter, Image Segmentation cell-average area is with the form that the increasing of scale parameter is in approximately power function Monotonic increase, the area of cutting unit is in approximately power function with the incremental of scale parameter.Correspondingly, the quantity of cutting unit is with chi Degree parameter is successively decreased approximately in power function.ED2 can be inclined as the combining form of PSE and NSR as the change of scale parameter is presented U-shaped curve form, as shown in Figure 1.
2nd, prior art
The method of segmentation quality evaluation has inconsistency method and goodness method.Based on inconsistency evaluation method by comparing ginseng Data set and partitioned data set are examined, comprehensive commenting is carried out to splitting quality in terms of geometry inconsistency and arithmetic inconsistency two Valency.Main inconsistency evaluation index has a series of segmentation quality evaluation index QR of the propositions such as Clinton etc., Weidner (Quality Rate), UR (Under-Segmentation Rate), OR (Over-Segmentation Rate) and ED1; Liu etc. proposes ED2 (Euclidean Distance 2) index based on geometry inconsistency and arithmetic inconsistency;And Yang Deng by analyzing ED1, ED2 serial evaluations index, ED3, ED3-Modified and SEI (Segmentation is further provided Evaluation Index).Meanwhile, Zhang etc. proposes F-measure indexs and MOA (Multiscale Object ) and BCA (Bidirectional Consistency Accuracy) Accuracy.Commented based on the partitioning parameters quality of goodness method What valency index was mainly built by local variance;The local variance for proposing Kim Deng (2010) is evaluated most Optimal sorting cuts the method for yardstick and is automated, and constructs the instrument ESP of optimal scale parameter selection;It is right Deng (2014) ESP instruments are improved.
By analyzing and summarizing optimal scale partitioning parameters system of selection, propose that yardstick evaluation should be with reference to shape, texture Etc. information, the automatic selection of multi-scale segmentation parameter is finally realized, but at present automatic mode mostly is non-supervisory segmentation, certain The partitioning parameters yardstick that there is selection in degree is bigger than normal, and over the ground the other specific aim of differentiating of species is not strong, and less divided phenomenon is obvious etc. Problem, this can bring detrimental effect to subsequent images classification.
The content of the invention
The purpose of the present invention is to overcome the deficiencies in the prior art, there is provided one kind evaluates automatically excellent based on region inconsistency The method for selecting Remote Sensing Image Segmentation parameter combination.
Technical scheme is as follows:
The invention discloses a kind of evaluate automatically the preferably method of Remote Sensing Image Segmentation parameter, bag based on region inconsistency Include following steps:
Step one:Input remote sensing image to be split and reference data set, initiation parameter, described initiation parameter bag Include given initial gauges partitioning parameters interval value s1And s5, and s5>s1, give minimum step d between multi-scale segmentation parametermin, give ED2minMaximum L, form factor, the compactness factor and ED2minMinimum ζ;
Step 2:If s5-s1>4dmin, then in initial gauges partitioning parameters value s1And s5On the basis of arrange 5 yardsticks Partitioning parameters and its step pitch, otherwise need to reset initial gauges partitioning parameters value s1And s5, d here>dminFor constraints, s1, s2, s3, s4, s5Five multi-scale segmentation parameters are specifically calculated as follows:
s2=s1+d
s4=s5-d
Step 3:According to s1, s2, s3, s4, s5Respective partitioned data set and reference data set in multi-scale segmentation parameter, point Do not count it and refer to polygon quantity, segmentation polygon quantity, overlapping area, over-segmentation area, less divided area, calculate successively Go out the corresponding PSE of the corresponding inconsistency metric parameter of each multi-scale segmentation parameteri, NSRiAnd ED2i, wherein i=2,3,4, 5}.Concrete calculation process is as follows:
In each multi-scale segmentation parameter, with R={ ri:I=1,2 ..., m } represent that m refers to polygonal set, S ={ sj:J=1,2 ..., n } the polygonal set of segmentation is represented, | ri∩sj| represent and refer to polygon riWith segmentation polygon sj The area of intersection, | ri| and | sj| respectively with reference to polygon riWith segmentation polygon sjArea, S'={ sk:K=1, 2 ..., v } represent the set of the partitioned data set corresponding with reference data set.Two subsets that Sa and Sb is set S are defined, And meet matching criterior:
That is matching criterior is with reference to polygon and splits the area of polygon intersection at least with reference to polygon Shape matches polygonal half of the area, then with reference to the polygonal set S' of segmentation that polygon matches be just Sa and Sb's and Collection.∑ is defined simultaneously | Ri| the polygonal gross area is referred to for m, ∑ | Sk| it is many with reference to the segmentation that polygon matches with m The side shape gross area, ∑ | Ri∩Sk| for reference data set and matching partitioned data set overlapping area, | ri-sj|=| ri|-|ri∩ sj| be matching polygon outside part with reference to polygonal area be over-segmentation area, | sj-ri|=| sj|-|ri∩sj | it is that to match polygonal area be less divided area for part outside with reference to polygon.Therefore, PSE, NSR and ED2 can be with It is expressed as:
Finally obtain the ED2 minimum of a values and maximum calculated between 5 points:
ED2min=min { ED21,ED22,ED23,ED24,ED25}
ED2max=max { ED21,ED22,ED23,ED24,ED25}
Step 4:Pattern matching process
ED2 is with s for analysis1~s5The trend and dynamic five multi-scale segmentation parameters of adjustment of multi-scale segmentation Parameters variation, constantly Matching inconsistent evaluation model Case a~17 kinds of the Case q changing patteries of PSE-NSR-ED2, obtain in the solid shape factor and The optimal scale partitioning parameters of remote sensing image under the compactness factor.
Step 5:Successively according to form factor=0.1,0.2 ..., 0.9, the compactness factor=0.1,0.2 ..., 0.9 Combination carries out step one to the interative computation of step 4, obtains the optimal scale partitioning parameters in 81 parameter combinations;So This 81 groups of optimal scale partitioning parameters are sorted again afterwards, the corresponding multi-scale segmentation parameter of minimum ED2 groups therefrom selected, shape Three parameter combinations of the shape factor and the compactness factor are optimum segmentation parameter combination.
Preferably, described step four ED2 has Case a~Case q17 kinds with the trend of multi-scale segmentation Parameters variation Pattern:
Case a.ED2iDo not change with multi-scale segmentation parameter, i.e. ED21=ED22=ED23=ED24=ED25, or Maximum therebetween, the difference of minimum of a value are less than default minimum ζ:
|ED2max-ED2min| < ζ
If so and ED2max>=L, then mean that default multi-scale segmentation parameter is substantially bigger than normal to ED2 value changes range of instability Domain, needs multi-scale segmentation parameter area to little value direction, by s5Move left to s1Position, s1Move to left 4 step pitches, s3For dynamic S after adjustment1And s5Value half, s2And s4Also 4 step pitches are accordingly moved to left:
s5←s1
s1←s1-4·d
s2←s1+d
s4←s5-d
Wherein " ← " represents the variable that the value of arrow right-hand member is assigned to arrow left end, and as multi-scale segmentation dynamic state of parameters is adjusted Whole process, the adjustment of five multi-scale segmentation parameters is synchronously to carry out, dividing without priority;S1~s5 on the right of arrow is tune Multi-scale segmentation parameter value before whole;With s5←s1As a example by;Represent former s1Value be assigned to new s5, that is, represent s5Move left to Former s1Position.
The adjustment of parameter is specifically according to the trend of multi-scale segmentation Parameters variation to s1~s5Dynamic adjustment, complete corresponding Multi-scale segmentation parameter " moving to left ", " moving to right ", " amplification " and " diminution " etc., all " ← " for mentioning represent this meaning in the present invention Think.
If s1<0, then make s1=5, s5Move to left s4Position, d for dynamic adjustment after s1And s5Value a quarter, s3For S after dynamic adjustment1And s5Value 1/2nd, s2And s4Move to left 1 step pitch for newly obtaining:
s1←5
s5←s4
s2←s1+d
s4←s5-d
Return to step 3 continuation;
Otherwise when meeting condition ED2max<Expand multi-scale segmentation parameter search scope, corresponding s during L3It is constant, s1Reduce former The 2 times of step pitches come, s5Expand 2 times of original step pitches, s2And s4Original s is replaced respectively1And s5)
s2←s1
s4←s5
s1←s2-2·d
s5←s4+2·d
If there is s in expansion1<0, then make s1=5, s5Move to left s4Position, d for dynamic adjustment after s1And s5Value four/ One, s3For s after dynamic adjustment1And s5Value 1/2nd, s2And s4Move to left 1 step pitch for newly obtaining:
s1←5
s5←s4
s2←s1+d
s4←s5-d
Return to step 3 continuation;
If expanding the search of multi-scale segmentation parameter area, still there is ED2iDo not change with scale parameter, or therebetween Situation of the difference of maximum, minimum of a value less than one of default minimum ζ:
|ED2max-ED2min| < ζ
And ED2max≤ L, then optimal scale partitioning parameters may occupy first, sopt∈[s1,s5];Need to further sentence It is disconnected:If in front and back there is above-mentioned condition in computing twice, computing ED twice before and after contrast2min, take ED2minLess once conduct The scope of optimal scale partitioning parameters, sopt∈[s1,s5], then sopt=s5, end of run simultaneously reports result.
Case b.ED2iSuccessively decrease with the increase of multi-scale segmentation parameter, i.e. ED21≥ED22≥ED23≥ED24≥ED25, then Optimal scale partitioning parameters are more than s5, multi-scale segmentation parameter setting is adjusted, by s1It is shifted to the right to s3Position, s2It is shifted to the right to s4Position Put, s3It is shifted to the right to s5Position, s2And s4Also 2 step pitches are accordingly moved to right:
s1←s3
s2←s4
s3←s5
s4←s3+2·d
s5←s4+2·d
Return to step 3 continuation;
Case c.ED2iIn s4Place is presented minimum of a value flex point, i.e. ED21≥ED22≥ED23≥ED24And ED24≤ED25, Then optimal scale partitioning parameters are likely to be at s3And s5Between, by multi-scale segmentation parameter area to little value direction, then make s1It is shifted to the right to s2Position, s2It is shifted to the right to s3Position, s3It is shifted to the right to s4Position, s4It is shifted to the right to s5Position, s5Move to right 1 step pitch:
s1←s2
s2←s3
s3←s4
s4←s5
s5←s4+d
Return to step 3 continuation;
Case d.ED2iIn s3Place is presented minimum of a value flex point, i.e. ED21≥ED22≥ED23, and ED23≤ED24≤ED25, Then optimal scale partitioning parameters are in s2And s4Between;And if then ED23>=L, then mean that default multi-scale segmentation parameter is obvious It is bigger than normal to ED2 value changes unstable regions, need multi-scale segmentation scope to little value direction, by s5Move left to s1Position, s1It is left Move 4 step pitches, s3For s after dynamic adjustment5And s11/2nd, s2And s4Also 4 step pitches are accordingly moved to left:
s5←s1
s1←s1-4·d
s2←s1+d
s4←s2-d
If s1<0, then make s1=5, s5Move to left s4Position, d for dynamic adjustment after s1And s5Value a quarter, s3For S after dynamic adjustment1And s5Value 1/2nd, s2And s4Also 1 step pitch for newly obtaining accordingly is moved to left:
s1←5
s5←s4
s2←s1+d
s4←s5-d
Return to step 3 continuation;
Otherwise ED23<L, and d > dmin, then need in s2And s4Between encryption search, corresponding s3It is constant, by s1Move to left To s2Position, s5Move left to s4Position, s2And s4Also 1/2nd step pitches are accordingly moved to left:
s1←s2
s5←s4
Until d≤dmin, and meet ED23<L, then sopt=s3
Case e.ED2iIn s2Place is presented minimum of a value flex point, i.e. ED21≥ED22, and ED22≤ED23≤ED24≤ED24, Then optimal scale partitioning parameters are likely to be at s1And s3Between, if ED22<L, and d<dmin, then s2For optimized parameter;Else if ED22>=L, then need multi-scale segmentation parameter area to little value direction, then make s5Move left to s4Position, s4Move left to s3Position Put, s3Move left to s2Position, s2Move left to s1Position, s1Move to left 1 step pitch:
s5←s4
s4←s3
s3←s2
s2←s1
s1←s1-d
If s1<0, then make s1=5, s5Move to left s4Position, d for dynamic adjustment after s1And s5Value a quarter, s3For S after dynamic adjustment1And s5Value 1/2nd, s2And s4Also 1 step pitch for newly obtaining accordingly is moved to left:
s1←5
s5←s4
s2←s1+d
s4←s5-d
Return to step 3 continuation;
Otherwise work as ED22<L, and d>dmin, in s1And s3Place's encryption, then need in s2And s4Between encryption search, corresponding s3 It is constant, by s1Move left to s2Position, s5Move left to s4Position, s2And s4Also 1/2nd step pitches are accordingly moved to left:
s1←s2
s5←s4
Return to step 3 continuation;
Case f.ED2iIt is incremented by with multi-scale segmentation parameter, i.e. ED21≤ED22≤ED23≤ED24≤ED22, then optimal scale Partitioning parameters are less than s1Or neighbouring s1, then s is made5Move left to s3Position, s3Move left to s1Position, s4Move left to s2Position, s2Move to left 2 step pitches, s1Move to left 2 step pitches:
s5←s3
s3←s1
s4←s2
s2←s3-d
s1←s2-d
If s1<0, then make s1=5, s5Move to left s4Position, d for dynamic adjustment after s1And s5Value a quarter, s3For S after dynamic adjustment1And s5Value 1/2nd, s2And s4Also 1 step pitch for newly obtaining accordingly is moved to left:
s1←5
s5←s4
s2←s1+d
s4←s5-d
Return to step 3 continuation;
Case g-Case q. are incremented by with multi-scale segmentation parameter, ED2iTend to unstable with the variation tendency of multi-scale segmentation parameter It is fixed, ED2i values unstable region that arrives with multi-scale segmentation Parameters variation, and ED2min>=L, then mean default multi-scale segmentation parameter It is substantially bigger than normal to ED2iValue changes unstable region, needs to move to left segmentation scale parameter scope to little value direction, by s5Move left to s1Position, s1Move to left 4 step pitches, s3For s after dynamic adjustment1And s5Value half, s2And s4Also 4 step pitches are accordingly moved to left:
s5←s1
s1←s1-4·d
s2←s1+d
s4←s2-d
If s1<0, then make s1=5, s5Move to left s4Position, d for dynamic adjustment after s1And s5Value a quarter, s3For S after dynamic adjustment1And s5Value 1/2nd, s2And s4Also accordingly move to left 1 and newly obtain step pitch:
s1←5
s5←s4
s2←s1+d
s4←s5-d
Return to step 3 continuation:Otherwise run into ED2maxDuring≤L, this group of data of acquisition will be calculated after amplification with upper one group The ED2 of dataminIt is compared, if there is continuing to amplify less than the situation of upper one group of minimum of a value, until finding minimum ED2min, amplification terminates, it is determined that minimum ED2minInterval, be then encrypted in smallest interval, be encrypted into d≤dmin, encryption knot Beam, takes its ED2minCorresponding multi-scale segmentation parameter is optimal scale partitioning parameters.
Preferably, minimum step d between multi-scale segmentation parameter is given in described step onemin=1, give ED2minMaximum L=1.0, form factor=0.1, the compactness factor=0.1, ED2minMinimum ζ=0.0001.
The present invention ground spatial analysis and pattern match are used in particular problem, it is determined that optimum segmentation parameter can land used Spatial analysis is learned and based on geometry inconsistency and arithmetic inconsistency definite principle ground be further explained, with higher theory Confidence level.
The inventive method, is not limited to Remote Sensing Image Segmentation parameter optimization algorithm, can be widely applied to the oblique U of any obedience The model of type curve distribution asks the problem of optimal value, the method to have wide applicability and using value.
The prediction of partitioning parameters before the inventive method, substantially remote sensing images analysis, it is to avoid selection parameter it is blind Mesh, solves uncertainty that trial-and-error method brings and that the method for exhaustion is brought is time-consuming, while having taken into account operating efficiency, also improves Object-oriented remote sensing image processes the precision and automaticity with analysis.
Description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is given form factor and the oblique U-shaped ED2-SP pattern diagrams of the compactness factor;
Fig. 2 is 17 kind basic model schematic diagrames of the ED2 with multi-scale segmentation Parameters variation;
Fig. 3 evaluates automatically the preferably method of Remote Sensing Image Segmentation parameter for the embodiment of the present invention based on region inconsistency Procedure Procedure figure;
Fig. 4 is the track pair that the embodiment of the present invention and the method for exhaustion select the automatic search of remote sensing image optimum segmentation parameter combination Than figure;
Fig. 5 applies the segmentation in the Quick bird high-resolution remote sensing images of Dongguan City, Guangdong Province for the embodiment of the present invention Design sketch;
Fig. 6 is applied in Hui Nationality in Ningxia Hui Nationality Autonomy autonomous prefecture Zhongwei City World view2 high-definition remote sensing shadows for the embodiment of the present invention Segmentation effect figure as in.
Specific embodiment
As shown in figure 3, evaluating automatically preferably Remote Sensing Image Segmentation ginseng based on region inconsistency for the embodiment of the present invention Several method flow flow charts;In all embodiments of the invention, step one gives minimum step d between multi-scale segmentation parametermin =1, give ED2minMaximum L=1.0, form factor=0.1, the compactness factor=0.1, ED2minMinimum ζ=0.0001.
It is illustrated in figure 2 17 kind basic model schematic diagrames of the ED2 with multi-scale segmentation Parameters variation.
1. the method for the present invention and the method for exhaustion select the contrast of optimum segmentation parameter combination
The embodiment of the present invention is applied into Dongguan City, Guangdong Province and Hui Nationality in Ningxia Hui Nationality Autonomy autonomous prefecture Zhongwei City three kinds of sensors (Quick bird, Alos, World view2) it is multispectral with fusion 6 scape high-resolution remote sensing images in 3 kinds of different atural objects The selection of (arable land FL, residential building RB, swag WB) optimum segmentation parameter combination, and compared with the result of method of exhaustion acquisition Compared with, tested with the computer for similarly configuring in experiment, initial gauges parameter area is unified, it is ensured that two methods have There is comparativity, obtain experimental result, wherein as shown in table 1, method of the present invention result is as shown in table 2 for method of exhaustion experimental result.
Contrast Tables 1 and 2, it can be found that the embodiment of the present invention substantially can under identical initial gauges parameter area The partitioned data set compared with small data magnitude is produced, the spent time is also relatively also shorter, and step-length can be accurate to 1, obtained The value of more accurate ED2 is determining the optimum segmentation parameter combination of remote sensing image, but the currently a popular method of exhaustion needs The partitioned data set that step-length specifies mechanically is produced, step-length is once it is determined that dynamic can not adjust, the initial gauges parameter for finding Scope, as initial gauges parameter area considers not comprehensively, not being enumerated to the scope of optimum segmentation parameter combination presence, Specific restriction is brought to parameter is found.The contrast tested by this, embodiment of the present invention performance is good, not only can be with Optimal scale partitioning parameters are quickly obtained by arranging suitable initial gauges parameter area, and step can be changed with dynamic It is long, can precisely predict that PSE-NSR-ED2 inconsistencies evaluation model obtains the interval of optimal scale partitioning parameters, save the time While avoid select optimum segmentation parameter combination blindness.
The method of exhaustion result statistical form of table 1
The inventive method result statistical form of table 2
Obtain from Tables 1 and 2 when one group of form factor and the compactness factor are extracted in substantial amounts of data being all 0.1, select The track of optimal scale partitioning parameters is analyzed, and can be clearly seen that in the embodiment of the present invention can split in initial gauges Then fast prediction starts encryption and determines optimum to the interval of the presence of optimal scale partitioning parameters in the range of parameter, and poor Act method does not have any acquisition track, needs the artificial judgment tiltedly optimum position of U-shaped curve, as shown in Figure 4.
2. the method for the present invention and other automatic segmentation parameter preferred kit contrasts
By the embodiment of the present invention withThe instrument ESP of the automatic preferred remote sensing image scale parameter proposed Deng (2014) Contrasted, experimental data be Dongguan City, Guangdong Province and Hui Nationality in Ningxia Hui Nationality Autonomy autonomous prefecture Zhongwei City three kinds of sensors (Quick bird, Alos, World view2) 3 kinds of different atural objects (arable land, forest land, swag) in 3 scape high-resolution remote sensing images, because ESP can only Optimal scale partitioning parameters are selected, using the form factor found in the embodiment of the present invention and the compactness factor as standard, and is set Putting identical initial gauges parameter and step-length carries out contrast experiment.According to the regulation in segmentation precision evaluation index, producer's essence Degree and user's precision all close 1, the optimum principle of segmentation effect weighs the result in table 3, it can be found that user's essence of ESP instruments Degree is very unstable, minimum to reach 0.11, and the optimal scale partitioning parameters for finding are substantially bigger than normal, and partitioned data set magnitude is very Greatly, whole efficiency is poor.
The optimum segmentation parametric results of table 3 and precision evaluation contrast statistical form
3. Fig. 5 is the embodiment of the present invention and the optimum segmentation parameter combination of method of exhaustion acquisition to Dongguan City, Guangdong Province Quick Segmentation effect of the bird high-resolution remote sensing images to water body, it can be seen that can well divide the region of water body, too Cut and less divided phenomenon is all solved well;Fig. 6 is the embodiment of the present invention and the optimum segmentation parameter combination of method of exhaustion acquisition to peaceful Segmentation effect of summer autonomous prefecture of the Hui ethnic group Zhongwei City World view2 high-resolution remote sensing images to arable land, hence it is evident that it can be seen that this Inventive embodiments can predict the optimal scale partitioning parameters scope of such atural object than larger, but method of exhaustion ignorant of the economics Mesh thinks initial gauges parameter area it has been estimated that maximum magnitude, and so artificial interpretation has a serious subjectivity.

Claims (3)

1. a kind of method that automatically preferably Remote Sensing Image Segmentation parameter is evaluated based on region inconsistency, it is characterised in that include as Lower step:
Step one:Input remote sensing image to be split and reference data set, initiation parameter, described initiation parameter include to Determine initial gauges partitioning parameters interval value s1And s5, and s5>s1, give minimum step d between multi-scale segmentation parametermin, give ED2min Maximum L, form factor, the compactness factor and ED2minMinimum ζ;Step 2:If s5-s1>4dmin, then in initial gauges point Cut parameter value s1And s5On the basis of 5 multi-scale segmentation parameters and its step pitch are set, otherwise need to reset initial gauges segmentation ginseng Numerical value s1And s5, d here>dminFor constraints, s1, s2, s3, s4, s5Five multi-scale segmentation parameters are specifically calculated as follows:
d = 1 4 ( s 5 - s 1 )
s 3 = 1 2 ( s 1 + s 5 )
s2=s1+d
s4=s5-d
Step 3:According to s1, s2, s3, s4, s5Respective partitioned data set and reference data set, unite respectively in multi-scale segmentation parameter Count it and refer to polygon quantity, segmentation polygon quantity, overlapping area, over-segmentation area, less divided area, calculate successively it is every The corresponding PSE of the corresponding inconsistency metric parameter of one multi-scale segmentation parameteri, NSRiAnd ED2i, wherein i={ 2,3,4,5 }. Concrete calculation process is as follows:
In each multi-scale segmentation parameter, with R={ ri:I=1,2 ..., m } represent that m refers to polygonal set, S={ sj: J=1,2 ..., n } the polygonal set of segmentation is represented, | ri∩sj| represent and refer to polygon riWith segmentation polygon sjCross-shaped portion The area for dividing, | ri| and | sj| respectively with reference to polygon riWith segmentation polygon sjArea, S'={ sk:K=1,2 ..., v } Represent the set of the partitioned data set corresponding with reference data set.Define two subsets that Sa and Sb is set S, and satisfaction With criterion:
S a = { s j : | r i &cap; s j | | s j | > 0.5 }
S b = { s j : | r i &cap; s j | | r i | > 0.5 }
That is matching criterior be with reference to polygon and segmentation polygon intersection area at least with reference to polygon or Polygonal half of the area is matched, then the polygonal set S' of segmentation for matching with reference to polygon is just the union of Sa and Sb. ∑ is defined simultaneously | Ri| the polygonal gross area is referred to for m, ∑ | Sk| it is polygon with reference to the segmentation that polygon matches with m The shape gross area, ∑ | Ri∩Sk| for reference data set and matching partitioned data set overlapping area, | ri-sj|=| ri|-|ri∩sj | be matching polygon outside part with reference to polygonal area be over-segmentation area, | sj-ri|=| sj|-|ri∩sj| It is that to match polygonal area be less divided area for part outside with reference to polygon.Therefore, PSE, NSR and ED2 can be with It is expressed as:
P S E = &Sigma; | S k | - &Sigma; | S k &cap; R i | &Sigma; | R i |
N S R = a b s ( m - n ) m
E D 2 = PSE 2 + NSR 2
Finally obtain the ED2 minimum of a values and maximum calculated between 5 points:
ED2min=min { ED21,ED22,ED23,ED24,ED25}
ED2max=max { ED21,ED22,ED23,ED24,ED25}
Step 4:Pattern matching process
ED2 is with s for analysis1~s5The trend and dynamic five multi-scale segmentation parameters of adjustment of multi-scale segmentation Parameters variation, constantly matches The inconsistent evaluation model Case a of PSE-NSR-ED2~17 kinds of Case q changing patteries, obtain in the solid shape factor and compact The optimal scale partitioning parameters of remote sensing image under the degree factor.
Step 5:Successively according to form factor=0.1,0.2 ..., 0.9, the compactness factor=0.1,0.2 ..., 0.9 combination Mode carries out step one to the interative computation of step 4, obtains the optimal scale partitioning parameters in 81 parameter combinations;Then it is right This 81 groups of optimal scale partitioning parameters are sorted again, the corresponding multi-scale segmentation parameter of minimum ED2 groups therefrom selected, shape because Son and three parameter combinations of the compactness factor are optimum segmentation parameter combination.
2. method according to claim 1, it is characterised in that described step four ED2 becoming with multi-scale segmentation Parameters variation Gesture has Case a~17 kinds of Case q patterns:
Case a.ED2iDo not change with multi-scale segmentation parameter, i.e. ED21=ED22=ED23=ED24=ED25, or therebetween Maximum, the difference of minimum of a value be less than default minimum ζ:
|ED2max-ED2min| < ζ
If so and ED2max>=L, then mean that default multi-scale segmentation parameter is substantially bigger than normal to ED2 value changes unstable regions, needs By multi-scale segmentation parameter area to little value direction, by s5Move left to s1Position, s1Move to left 4 step pitches, s3After dynamic adjustment s1And s5Value half, s2And s4Also 4 step pitches are accordingly moved to left:
s5←s1
s1←s1-4·d
s 3 &LeftArrow; 1 2 ( s 1 + s 5 )
s2←s1+d
s4←s5-d
If s1<0, then make s1=5, s5Move to left s4Position, d for dynamic adjustment after s1And s5Value a quarter, s3For dynamic tune Whole rear s1And s5Value 1/2nd, s2And s4Move to left 1 step pitch for newly obtaining:
s1←5
s5←s4
d &LeftArrow; 1 4 ( s 5 - s 1 )
s 3 &LeftArrow; 1 2 ( s 5 + s 1 )
s2←s1+d
s4←s5-d
Return to step 3 continuation;
Otherwise when meeting condition ED2max<Expand multi-scale segmentation parameter search scope, corresponding s during L3It is constant, s1Reduce original 2 Times step pitch, s5Expand 2 times of original step pitches, s2And s4Original s is replaced respectively1And s5)
s2←s1
s4←s5
s1←s2-2·d
s5←s4+2·d
If there is s in expansion1<0, then make s1=5, s5Move to left s4Position, d for dynamic adjustment after s1And s5Value a quarter, s3 For s after dynamic adjustment1And s5Value 1/2nd, s2And s4Move to left 1 step pitch for newly obtaining:
s1←5
s5←s4
d &LeftArrow; 1 4 ( s 5 - s 1 )
s 3 &LeftArrow; 1 2 ( s 5 + s 1 )
s2←s1+d
s4←s5-d
Return to step 3 continuation;
If expanding the search of multi-scale segmentation parameter area, still there is ED2iDo not change with scale parameter, or maximum therebetween, Situation of the difference of minimum of a value less than one of default minimum ζ:
|ED2max-ED2min| < ζ
And ED2max≤ L, then optimal scale partitioning parameters may occupy first, sopt∈[s1,s5];Further judgement need to be made:Such as There is above-mentioned condition in computing twice before and after fruit, computing ED twice before and after contrast2min, take ED2mIn is less once as optimum The scope of multi-scale segmentation parameter, sopt∈[s1,s5], then sopt=s5, end of run simultaneously reports result.
Case b.ED2iSuccessively decrease with the increase of multi-scale segmentation parameter, i.e. ED21
ED22≥ED23≥ED24≥ED25, then optimal scale partitioning parameters are more than s5, multi-scale segmentation parameter setting is adjusted, by s1It is right Move on to s3Position, s2It is shifted to the right to s4Position, s3It is shifted to the right to s5Position, s2And s4Also 2 step pitches are accordingly moved to right:
s1←s3
s2←s4
s3←s5
s4←s3+2·d
s5←s4+2·d
Return to step 3 continuation;
Case c.ED2iIn s4Place is presented minimum of a value flex point, i.e. ED21≥ED22≥ED23≥ED24And ED24≤ED25, then most Excellent multi-scale segmentation parameter is likely to be at s3And s5Between, by multi-scale segmentation parameter area to little value direction, then make s1It is shifted to the right to s2's Position, s2It is shifted to the right to s3Position, s3It is shifted to the right to s4Position, s4It is shifted to the right to s5Position, s5Move to right 1 step pitch:
s1←s2
s2←s3
s3←s4
s4←s5
s5←s4+d
Return to step 3 continuation;
Case d.ED2iIn s3Place is presented minimum of a value flex point, i.e. ED21≥ED22≥ED23, and ED23≤ED24≤ED25, then most Excellent multi-scale segmentation parameter is in s2And s4Between;And if then ED23>=L, then mean that default multi-scale segmentation parameter is substantially bigger than normal To ED2 value changes unstable regions, need multi-scale segmentation scope to little value direction, by s5Move left to s1Position, s1Move to left 4 Individual step pitch, s3For s after dynamic adjustment5And s11/2nd, s2And s4Also 4 step pitches are accordingly moved to left:
s5←s1
s1←s1-4·d
s 3 &LeftArrow; 1 2 ( s 1 + s 2 )
s2←s1+d
s4←s2-d
If s1<0, then make s1=5, s5Move to left s4Position, d for dynamic adjustment after s1And s5Value a quarter, s3For dynamic S after adjustment1And s5Value 1/2nd, s2And s4Also 1 step pitch for newly obtaining accordingly is moved to left:
s1←5
s5←s4
d &LeftArrow; 1 4 ( s 5 - s 1 )
s 3 &LeftArrow; 1 2 ( s 5 + s 1 )
s2←s1+d
s4←s5-d
Return to step 3 continuation;
Otherwise ED23<L, and d > dmin, then need in s2And s4Between encryption search, corresponding s3It is constant, by s1Move left to s2 Position, s5Move left to s4Position, s2And s4Also 1/2nd step pitches are accordingly moved to left:
s1←s2
s5←s4
s 2 &LeftArrow; s 1 + 1 2 &CenterDot; d
s 4 &LeftArrow; s 5 - 1 2 &CenterDot; d
Until d≤dmin, and meet ED23<L, then sopt=s3
Case e.ED2iIn s2Place is presented minimum of a value flex point, i.e. ED21≥ED22, and ED22≤ED23≤ED24≤ED24, then most Excellent multi-scale segmentation parameter is likely to be at s1And s3Between, if ED22<L, and d<dmin, then s2For optimized parameter;Else if ED22≥ L, then need multi-scale segmentation parameter area to little value direction, then make s5Move left to s4Position, s4Move left to s3Position, s3It is left Move on to s2Position, s2Move left to s1Position, s1Move to left 1 step pitch:
s5←s4
s4←s3
s3←s2
s2←s1
s1←s1-d
If s1<0, then make s1=5, s5Move to left s4Position, d for dynamic adjustment after s1And s5Value a quarter, s3For dynamic tune Whole rear s1And s5Value 1/2nd, s2And s4Also 1 step pitch for newly obtaining accordingly is moved to left:
s1←5
s5←s4
d &LeftArrow; 1 4 ( s 5 - s 1 )
s 3 &LeftArrow; 1 2 ( s 5 + s 1 )
s2←s1+d
s4←s5-d
Return to step 3 continuation;
Otherwise work as ED22<L, and d>dmin, in s1And s3Place's encryption, then need in s2And s4Between encryption search, corresponding s3No Become, by s1Move left to s2Position, s5Move left to s4Position, s2And s4Also 1/2nd step pitches are accordingly moved to left:
s1←s2
s5←s4
s 2 &LeftArrow; s 1 + 1 2 &CenterDot; d
s 5 &LeftArrow; s 2 - 1 2 &CenterDot; d
Return to step 3 continuation;
Case f.ED2iIt is incremented by with multi-scale segmentation parameter, i.e. ED21≤ED22≤ED23≤ED24≤ED22, then optimal scale segmentation Parameter is less than s1Or neighbouring s1, then s is made5Move left to s3Position, s3Move left to s1Position, s4Move left to s2Position, s2It is left Move 2 step pitches, s1Move to left 2 step pitches:
s5←s3
s3←s1
s4←s2
s2←s3-d
s1←s2-d
If s1<0, then make s1=5, s5Move to left s4Position, d for dynamic adjustment after s1And s5Value a quarter, s3For dynamic tune Whole rear s1And s5Value 1/2nd, s2And s4Also 1 step pitch for newly obtaining accordingly is moved to left:
s1←5
s5←s4
d &LeftArrow; 1 4 ( s 5 - s 1 )
s 3 &LeftArrow; 1 2 ( s 5 + s 1 )
s2←s1+d
s4←s5-d
Return to step 3 continuation;
Case g-Case q. are incremented by with multi-scale segmentation parameter, ED2iTend to unstable with the variation tendency of multi-scale segmentation parameter, ED2i values unstable region that arrives with multi-scale segmentation Parameters variation, and ED2min>=L, then mean that default multi-scale segmentation parameter is bright It is aobvious bigger than normal to ED2iValue changes unstable region, needs to move to left segmentation scale parameter scope to little value direction, by s5Move left to s1 Position, s1Move to left 4 step pitches, s3For s after dynamic adjustment1And s5Value half, s2And s4Also 4 step pitches are accordingly moved to left:
s5←s1
s1←s1-4·d
s 3 &LeftArrow; 1 2 ( s 1 + s 2 )
s2←s1+d
s4←s2-d
If s1<0, then make s1=5, s5Move to left s4Position, d for dynamic adjustment after s1And s5Value a quarter, s3For dynamic tune Whole rear s1And s5Value 1/2nd, s2And s4Also accordingly move to left 1 and newly obtain step pitch:
s1←5
s5←s4
d &LeftArrow; 1 4 ( s 5 - s 1 )
s 3 &LeftArrow; 1 2 ( s 5 + s 1 )
s2←s1+d
s4←s5-d
Return to step 3 continuation:Otherwise run into ED2maxDuring≤L, this group of data and upper one group of data of acquisition will be calculated after amplification ED2minIt is compared, if there is continuing to amplify less than the situation of upper one group of minimum of a value, until finding minimum ED2min, Amplification terminates, it is determined that minimum ED2minInterval, be then encrypted in smallest interval, be encrypted into d≤dmin, encryption terminates, takes Its ED2minCorresponding multi-scale segmentation parameter is optimal scale partitioning parameters.
3. method according to claim 1, it is characterised in that give in described step one minimum between multi-scale segmentation parameter Step pitch dmin=1, give ED2minMaximum L=1.0, form factor=0.1, the compactness factor=0.1, ED2minMinimum ζ= 0.0001。
CN201611005687.3A 2016-11-15 2016-11-15 Method based on the automatic preferably Remote Sensing Image Segmentation parameter of region inconsistency evaluation Active CN106651861B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201611005687.3A CN106651861B (en) 2016-11-15 2016-11-15 Method based on the automatic preferably Remote Sensing Image Segmentation parameter of region inconsistency evaluation

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201611005687.3A CN106651861B (en) 2016-11-15 2016-11-15 Method based on the automatic preferably Remote Sensing Image Segmentation parameter of region inconsistency evaluation

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN106651861A true CN106651861A (en) 2017-05-10
CN106651861B CN106651861B (en) 2019-05-24

Family

ID=58805378

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201611005687.3A Active CN106651861B (en) 2016-11-15 2016-11-15 Method based on the automatic preferably Remote Sensing Image Segmentation parameter of region inconsistency evaluation

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN106651861B (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112396615A (en) * 2020-11-27 2021-02-23 广东电网有限责任公司肇庆供电局 Individual stumpage segmentation method and device based on adjustable hemispherical canopy camera
CN113592022A (en) * 2021-08-11 2021-11-02 中国科学院空天信息创新研究院 Forest fire dangerous terrain identification method considering vegetation types

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120189212A1 (en) * 2011-01-24 2012-07-26 Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. Method and apparatus for comparing videos
CN103646400A (en) * 2013-12-17 2014-03-19 中国地质大学(北京) Automatic scale segmentation parameter selection method for object remote sensing image analysis
CN104200482A (en) * 2014-09-17 2014-12-10 武汉狮图空间信息技术有限公司 SSC (scale-shape-compactness) based optimization method of multi-scale segmentation parameters

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120189212A1 (en) * 2011-01-24 2012-07-26 Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. Method and apparatus for comparing videos
CN103646400A (en) * 2013-12-17 2014-03-19 中国地质大学(北京) Automatic scale segmentation parameter selection method for object remote sensing image analysis
CN104200482A (en) * 2014-09-17 2014-12-10 武汉狮图空间信息技术有限公司 SSC (scale-shape-compactness) based optimization method of multi-scale segmentation parameters

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
YONG LIU ET AL.: "Discrepancy measures for selecting optimal combination of parameter values in object-based image analysis", 《ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING》 *
吴波 等: "面向对象的高分辨率遥感影像分割分类评价指标", 《地球信息科学学报》 *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112396615A (en) * 2020-11-27 2021-02-23 广东电网有限责任公司肇庆供电局 Individual stumpage segmentation method and device based on adjustable hemispherical canopy camera
CN113592022A (en) * 2021-08-11 2021-11-02 中国科学院空天信息创新研究院 Forest fire dangerous terrain identification method considering vegetation types
CN113592022B (en) * 2021-08-11 2022-07-05 中国科学院空天信息创新研究院 Forest fire dangerous terrain identification method considering vegetation types

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN106651861B (en) 2019-05-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN102750739B (en) Construction method of three-dimensional geologic model
CN106355011B (en) Geochemical data element sequence structure analysis method and device
CN101763069B (en) Identification method of machining characteristics of complex parts of airplane
CN107627152B (en) Numerical control machining chip control method based on BP neural network
CN105760673B (en) A kind of fluvial depositional reservoir seismic-sensitive parameterized template analysis method
CN103310481B (en) A kind of point cloud compressing method based on fuzzy entropy iteration
CN109345007B (en) Advantageous reservoir development area prediction method based on XGboost feature selection
Zhu et al. Seed point selection method for triangle constrained image matching propagation
CN105427309A (en) Multiscale hierarchical processing method for extracting object-oriented high-spatial resolution remote sensing information
CN103926879B (en) Aero-engine casing characteristic recognition method
CN106651861A (en) Method for automatically and optimally selecting remote sensing image segmentation parameters based on regional inconsistency evaluation
CN104992178A (en) Tight sandstone fluid type identification method based on support vector machine simulation cross plot
CN104820826B (en) A kind of domatic extraction and recognition methods based on digital elevation model
CN107632967A (en) A kind of meadow grass yield evaluation method
CN109508753A (en) A kind of on-line prediction method of Mineral Floating Process index
CN110968618A (en) Method for mining quantitative association rule of welding parameters and application
CN105469408A (en) Building group segmentation method for SAR image
CN106777707A (en) A kind of method that WELL LITHOLOGY quantitative judge is carried out using improved spider diagram
CN105046265A (en) Iris image intestinal loop area detection method based on texture difference
CN109583276B (en) CNN-based height determination method and system for barefoot or stocking foot footmark
Kvapil et al. Using Gaussian mixture model clustering to explore morphology and standardized production of ceramic vessels: A case study of pottery from Late Bronze Age Greece
CN114091333A (en) Shale gas content artificial intelligence prediction method based on machine learning
CN105334336A (en) Automatic blood cell counting system and control method thereof
CN110765665B (en) Dynamic modeling method and system for geography
CN104036499A (en) Multi-scale superposition segmentation method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant