CN106377272A - Method and system for testing reaction capacity of driver - Google Patents
Method and system for testing reaction capacity of driver Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106377272A CN106377272A CN201610784528.1A CN201610784528A CN106377272A CN 106377272 A CN106377272 A CN 106377272A CN 201610784528 A CN201610784528 A CN 201610784528A CN 106377272 A CN106377272 A CN 106377272A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- driver
- test
- overbar
- analog
- respond
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 116
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 37
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 42
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 230000011514 reflex Effects 0.000 claims description 23
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000004575 stone Substances 0.000 description 3
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 241000208340 Araliaceae Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000005035 Panax pseudoginseng ssp. pseudoginseng Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000003140 Panax quinquefolius Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004744 fabric Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000008434 ginseng Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000002085 irritant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 231100000021 irritant Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/16—Devices for psychotechnics; Testing reaction times ; Devices for evaluating the psychological state
- A61B5/18—Devices for psychotechnics; Testing reaction times ; Devices for evaluating the psychological state for vehicle drivers or machine operators
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/16—Devices for psychotechnics; Testing reaction times ; Devices for evaluating the psychological state
- A61B5/162—Testing reaction times
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/26—Government or public services
- G06Q50/265—Personal security, identity or safety
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B2503/00—Evaluating a particular growth phase or type of persons or animals
- A61B2503/20—Workers
- A61B2503/22—Motor vehicles operators, e.g. drivers, pilots, captains
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Social Psychology (AREA)
- Psychiatry (AREA)
- Hospice & Palliative Care (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Surgery (AREA)
- Educational Technology (AREA)
- Developmental Disabilities (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Psychology (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Child & Adolescent Psychology (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Measurement Of The Respiration, Hearing Ability, Form, And Blood Characteristics Of Living Organisms (AREA)
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a method and a system for testing reaction capacity of a driver. The method for testing the reaction capacity of the driver comprises the following steps: after receiving an instruction of starting to test, controlling a simulating frame for showing the visual field of the driver; controlling to asynchronously show at least two barrier analog images in the simulating frame for showing the visual field of the driver; judging if receiving input information and confirming a test result of the reaction capacity of the driver according to a judging result and a reaction duration from the appearance of the barrier analog images to the receiving of the input information. According to the test method and system provided by the invention, the automatic test for the reaction capacity of the driver can be realized and the basis is supplied for the subsequent driver assessment and selection.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to traffic field tests, more particularly, to a kind of method of testing of driver's respond and system.
Background technology
High ferro driving operation judges to the signal of driver and the psychological diathesiss such as response speed propose very high requirement, these
The height of ability directly determines its operational performance and runs safety.But existing test and appraisal are all manually to carry out.Therefore, anxious at present
The respond assessment system being suitable for high ferro driver of a set of more objective science need to be developed, for its select provide decision-making according to
According to.
Content of the invention
Present invention seek to address that problem as described above.It is an object of the present invention to provide a kind of driver's respond
Method of testing and system avoid existing cannot test driver respond automatically defect.
According to the first aspect of the invention, provide a kind of method of testing of driver's respond, methods described includes:?
After receiving the instruction starting to test, control the analog picture of display driver's seat;Control the simulation in described driver's seat
Asynchronous display at least two barrier analog images in picture;Judge whether to receive input information, and according to judged result with
There is to the reaction duration receiving input information determining the reflex test result of driver from described barrier analog image.
According to the second aspect of the invention, a kind of test system of driver's respond is provided, including:Analog picture control
Display unit processed, for, after receiving the instruction starting to test, controlling the analog picture of display driver's seat;Barrier is simulated
Image control display unit, for controlling asynchronous display at least two barriers in the analog picture of described driver's seat
Analog image;Reflex test unit, is used for judging whether to receive input information, and according to judged result and from described obstacle
To the reaction duration receiving input information the reflex test result determining driver in thing analog image.
The method of testing of driver's respond of the present invention and test system are passed through to control the mould in described driver's seat
Intend the asynchronous situation showing that the true simulation of at least two barrier analog images is actual when driving in picture, and by judging
Whether receive input information, and occur to the reaction that receive input information according to judged result and from described barrier analog image
Duration determines that the reflex test result of driver realizes the automatic test of driver's respond, for follow-up driver evaluation
Select and foundation is provided.
Following description for exemplary embodiment is read with reference to the drawings, other property features of the present invention and advantage will
It is apparent from.
Brief description
It is incorporated in description and constitutes the accompanying drawing of a part for description and show embodiments of the invention, and with
Description is used for explaining the principle of the present invention together.In the drawings, similar reference is used for representing similar key element.Under
Accompanying drawing in the description of face is some embodiments of the present invention, rather than whole embodiments.Those of ordinary skill in the art are come
Say, on the premise of not paying creative work, other accompanying drawings can be obtained according to these accompanying drawings.
Fig. 1 schematically illustrates a kind of flow chart of the method for testing of driver's respond;
Fig. 2 schematically illustrates a kind of structured flowchart of the test system of driver's respond.
Specific embodiment
Purpose, technical scheme and advantage for making the embodiment of the present invention are clearer, below in conjunction with the embodiment of the present invention
In accompanying drawing, the technical scheme in the embodiment of the present invention is clearly and completely described it is clear that described embodiment is
The a part of embodiment of the present invention, rather than whole embodiments.Based on the embodiment in the present invention, those of ordinary skill in the art
The every other embodiment being obtained under the premise of not making creative work, broadly falls into the scope of protection of the invention.Need
Illustrate, in the case of not conflicting, the embodiment in the application and the feature in embodiment can mutual combination in any.
Embodiment one
Fig. 1 schematically illustrates a kind of flow chart of the method for testing of driver's respond;As shown in figure 1, it is a kind of
The method of testing of driver's respond, including:
Step 101:After receiving the instruction starting to test, control the analog picture of display driver's seat;Concrete operations
When, this analog picture can be the video of one section of simulation train operation;The instruction that this starts to test is to distinguish official testing
With practice stage and arrange, exercise rank is broken to allow and is test for driver and is familiar with operation, and official testing then offical record
Data, obtains corresponding test result;
Step 103:Control asynchronous display at least two barrier simulation in the analog picture of described driver's seat
Image;Specifically, described at least two barrier analog images include at least one default threat image and at least one
Default safe object image;
During concrete operations, this threat image can be the image of stone, that is, need driver to adjust driver behavior
The image of reaction;Safe object image can be the image of bird, adjust the image of driver behavior reaction without driver;
The probability of threat image and the appearance of safe object image can be arranged according to actual needs, and such as danger assumes probability is 20%;
Step 105:Judge whether to receive input information;
Step 107:According to judged result with from described barrier analog image occur to receive input information reaction when
The long reflex test result determining driver;
Specifically, described at least two barrier analog images include at least one default threat image and at least one
Plant default safe object image;
If step 107 can include showing described threat image, and described input information and default reference information one
During cause, the meansigma methodss of described reaction duration as the response speed parameter of described driver, if not collecting described input information
When, then it is incremented by for representing that what described driver failed to report to danger fail to report parameter;Or/and,
If showing described safe object image, if collect described input information, it is incremented by for representing described driver
Wrong report parameter to the wrong report of safe thing.
The method of testing of the present embodiment driver's respond is passed through to control in the analog picture of described driver's seat
The asynchronous situation showing that the true simulation of at least two barrier analog images is actual when driving, and by judging whether to receive
Input information, and occur to the reaction duration receiving input information determining with from described barrier analog image according to judged result
The reflex test result of driver realizes the automatic test of driver's respond, and selecting for follow-up driver evaluation provides
Foundation.
Additionally, it is preferably square also at least to there is following one kind in the method for testing other embodiments of this driver respond
Formula:
Step 103 specifically can include:Control multiple default picture ranges in the analog picture of described driver's seat
Position individually shows one of described at least two barrier analog images;The plurality of default picture range position includes mould
Intend picture two side position and analog picture centre position.It is further preferred that the plurality of default picture range position is uniformly divided
Cloth is in described analog picture.Correspondingly, method of testing can also include:According to judged result and from described barrier simulation drawing
As occurring to the reaction duration receiving input information determining that the step of the reflex test result of driver includes:
Occur in the anti-of analog picture two side position and analog picture centre position according in described barrier analog image
Meansigma methodss, rate of failing to report and the rate of false alarm of answering duration determine the reflex test result in different range positions of driver.
Specifically, multiple default picture range positions can include but is not limited to 10 positions, and train visual field screen is long
Square, each 5 of left and right.
Step 107 can also include:Using described fail to report parameter with show described threat image number of times ratio as
The rate of failing to report that described driver fails to report to danger;Ratio by described wrong report parameter and the number of times showing described safe object image
The rate of false alarm safe thing reported by mistake as described driver.
Can include before step 103:Control and show that traveling watches mesh attentively in the analog picture of described driver's seat
Cursor position.It is further preferred that described travel the center that fixation object position is located at the analog picture of described driver's seat.Tool
When gymnastics is made, this traveling fixation object position can be in train visual field center Screen position, can pass through cross, a round dot
Or the display of other identification patterns such as five-pointed star travels fixation object position.
Specifically:The method of testing of described driver's respond, also includes:To described
Any one in the meansigma methodss of reaction duration, rate of failing to report and rate of false alarm is standardized at process or concordance
Reason;
Assume that total n driver participates in test, total m item test index.If the jth item test value of i-th people is xij, wherein
I=1,2 ..., n, j=1,2 ..., m
Wherein, standardization is:
Note jth item test index sample average beSample variance isIts
Middle j is the test sequence number of driver's respond, then after standardization be:
Consistency treatment is:
Wherein Mj=max { yij, i=1,2 ..., n }, mj=min { yij, i=1,2 ..., n }, j=m1+1,m1+2,…,m1
+m2.
Described basis occurs in analog picture two side position and analog picture centre position in described barrier analog image
The reaction meansigma methodss of duration, rate of failing to report and rate of false alarm determine the reflex test result in different range positions of driver
Step include:
Relatively through standardization or consistency treatment meansigma methodss, rate of failing to report and rate of false alarm and each corresponding default ginseng
Examine value to be compared, determine the evaluation result of driver according to comparative result, wherein,
Each reference value is standardized processing or consistency treatment;
If the underproof reference value of jth item index expression is θj, the reference value of jth item qualified isJ is driver
The test sequence number of respond;
The standardization of reference value is:
The unification of reference value is processed as:
Included according to the evaluation result that comparative result determines driver:
IfThen judge that i-th driver belongs to unqualified;
IfThen judge that i-th driver belongs to qualified;
Wherein I () is logical judgment function, and that is, expression formula takes 1 for true time;Otherwise take 0.
Embodiment two
Fig. 2 schematically illustrates a kind of structured flowchart of the test system of driver's respond, and it is respectively driven for above-mentioned
The corresponding system of method of testing illustrated embodiment of the person's of sailing respond, shown in the method for testing of above-mentioned each driver's respond
The explanation of embodiment is applied to the present embodiment.As shown in Fig. 2 this test system includes:
Analog picture control display unit 201, for after receiving the instruction starting to test, controlling display driver to regard
Wild analog picture;
Barrier analog image control display unit 203, for controlling in the analog picture of described driver's seat not
Simultaneous display at least two barrier analog image;
Reflex test unit 205, is used for judging whether to receive input information, and according to judged result and from described barrier
Hinder thing analog image that the reflex test result determining driver occurs to the reaction duration receiving input information.
Preferably, described at least two barrier analog images include at least one default threat image and at least one
Plant default safe object image;Described reflex test unit 205 can include:
First test cell (not shown), if for showing described threat image, and described input information with pre-
If reference information consistent when, the meansigma methodss of described reaction duration as the response speed parameter of described driver, if not gathering
During to described input information, then it is incremented by for representing that what described driver failed to report to danger fail to report parameter;Or/and;
Second test cell (not shown), if for showing described safe object image, if collect described input letter
During breath, then it is incremented by for representing the wrong report parameter that described driver reports by mistake to safe thing.
It is further preferred that described barrier analog image control display unit is additionally operable to control in described driver's seat
Analog picture in multiple default picture range positions individually show one of described at least two barrier analog images;Institute
State multiple default picture range positions and include analog picture two side position and analog picture centre position
Preferably, the test system of described driver's respond can include:
Range test cell 207, for according to described barrier analog image occur in analog picture two side position and
The reaction meansigma methodss of duration in analog picture centre position, rate of failing to report and rate of false alarm determine driver in different range positions
Reflex test result.
Preferably, the test system of described driver's respond also includes:Target location control display unit 209, uses
Show traveling fixation object position in controlling in the analog picture of described driver's seat.
Specifically, test system, also includes:
Data processing unit, for entering to any one in the described meansigma methodss reacting duration, rate of failing to report and rate of false alarm
Row standardization or consistency treatment;
Assume that total n driver participates in test, total m item test index.If the jth item test value of i-th people is xij, wherein
I=1,2 ..., n, j=1,2 ..., m
Wherein, standardization is:
Note jth item test index sample average beSample variance isIts
Middle j is the test sequence number of driver's respond, then after standardization be:
Consistency treatment is:
Wherein Mj=max { yij, i=1,2 ..., n }, mj=min { yij, i=1,2 ..., n }, j=m1+1,m1+2,…,m1
+m2.
Described range test cell also includes:
Reference value processes subelement, is standardized processing or consistency treatment for each reference value;If jth item index table
Show that underproof reference value isθ j, the reference value of jth item qualified isJ is the test sequence number of driver's respond;
The standardization of reference value is:
The unification of reference value is processed as:
Range tests subelement, is used for comparing through standardization or consistency treatment meansigma methodss, rate of failing to report and wrong report
Rate is compared with each corresponding default reference value, determines the evaluation result of driver according to comparative result,.
Range test subelement includes
Evaluation module, is used for:
IfThen judge that i-th driver belongs to unqualified;
IfThen judge that i-th driver belongs to qualified;
Wherein I () is logical judgment function, and that is, expression formula takes 1 for true time;Otherwise take 0.
The work process of the test system of this driver respond is summarized as follows:Receiving the instruction starting to test
Afterwards, the video of train operation is simulated on screen, assumes " ten " point of fixation in train visual field center Screen;Driver according to
" ten " word of center Screen is watched in prompting always attentively.In test process, predetermined instant point has bird or stone to occur in screen
Diverse location on, when stone image occurs, input predetermined key information, then realize danger correct response, otherwise
Report by mistake for danger or fail to report;It is not necessary to button reacts, if there being any input information, for safety when bird occurs
Thing is reported by mistake.During concrete operations, various obstructions chart pictures can flash at random on default (as 10) position, left according to contrast screen
In the middle of right two borders and screen during irritant reaction, the data such as mistake rate of failing to report to be surveying tested personnel's range ability.It is achieved in surveying
The size of examination driver's attention field when driving is span of attention ability, response speed, danger rate of failing to report, safe thing
The indexs such as rate of false alarm.
The test system of the present embodiment driver's respond controls different in the analog picture of described driver's seat
Situation during the actual driving of the step display true simulation of at least two barrier analog images, and by judging whether to receive input
Information, and driven with occurring determining to the reaction duration receiving input information from described barrier analog image according to judged result
The reflex test result of member realizes the automatic test of driver's respond, select for follow-up driver evaluation provide according to
According to.
Descriptions above can combine individually or in every way enforcement, and these variant all exist
Within protection scope of the present invention.
Finally it should be noted that:Above example only in order to technical scheme to be described, is not intended to limit.Although
With reference to the foregoing embodiments the present invention is described in detail, it will be understood by those within the art that:It still may be used
To modify to the technical scheme described in foregoing embodiments, or equivalent is carried out to wherein some technical characteristics;
And these modification or replace, do not make appropriate technical solution essence depart from various embodiments of the present invention technical scheme spirit and
Scope.
Claims (16)
1. a kind of method of testing of driver's respond is it is characterised in that methods described includes:
After receiving the instruction starting to test, control the analog picture of display driver's seat;
Control asynchronous display at least two barrier analog images in the analog picture of described driver's seat;
Judge whether to receive input information, and according to judged result with from described barrier analog image occur to receive input letter
The reaction duration of breath determines the reflex test result of driver.
2. according to claim 1 the method for testing of driver's respond it is characterised in that described at least two barriers
Analog image includes at least one default threat image and at least one default safe object image;
Described judge whether to receive input information, and according to judged result with occur from described barrier analog image defeated to receiving
The reaction duration entering information determines that the step of the reflex test result of driver includes:
If showing described threat image, and when described input information is consistent with default reference information, described reaction duration
Meansigma methodss, as the response speed parameter of described driver, if do not collect described input information, are incremented by for representing
That states that driver fails to report to danger fails to report parameter;Or/and,
If showing described safe object image, if collect described input information, it is incremented by for representing described driver to peace
The wrong report parameter of full thing wrong report.
3. according to claim 2 driver's respond method of testing it is characterised in that described according to judged result with
There is to the reaction duration receiving input information determining the reflex test result of driver from described barrier analog image
Step also include:
Fail to report described parameter and as described driver, danger is failed to report with the ratio of number of times showing described threat image
Rate of failing to report;
The ratio of described wrong report parameter and the number of times showing described safe object image is reported by mistake as described driver to safe thing
Rate of false alarm.
4. according to claim 3 the method for testing of driver's respond it is characterised in that described control in described driving
In the analog picture in the member visual field, the step of asynchronous display at least two barrier analog images includes:
Control multiple default picture range positions individually display described at least two in the analog picture of described driver's seat
One of barrier analog image;The plurality of default picture range position includes analog picture two side position and analog picture
Centre position;Or/and,
Control and show traveling fixation object position in the analog picture of described driver's seat.
5. according to claim 4 the method for testing of driver's respond it is characterised in that the plurality of default picture is wide
Degree position is evenly distributed in described analog picture;Or/and,
According to judged result and occur to the reaction duration receiving input information determining driver from described barrier analog image
The step of reflex test result include:
According to occur in described barrier analog image analog picture two side position and analog picture centre position reaction when
The meansigma methodss of length, rate of failing to report and rate of false alarm determine the reflex test result in different range positions of driver.
6. according to claim 5 the method for testing of driver's respond it is characterised in that also including:To described reaction
Any one in the meansigma methodss of duration, rate of failing to report and rate of false alarm is standardized processing or consistency treatment;
Assume that total n driver participates in test, total m item test index, if the jth item test value of i-th people is xij, wherein i=
1,2 ..., n, j=1,2 ..., m
Wherein, standardization is:
Note jth item test index sample average beSample variance isWherein j
For the test sequence number of driver's respond, after standardization it is then:
Consistency treatment is:
Wherein Mj=max { yij, i=1,2 ..., n }, mj=min { yij, i=1,2 ..., n }, j=m1+1,m1+2,…,m1+m2.
7. according to claim 6 the method for testing of driver's respond it is characterised in that described basis is in described obstacle
Thing analog image occur in the meansigma methodss of reaction duration in analog picture two side position and analog picture centre position, rate of failing to report and
Rate of false alarm determines that the step of the reflex test result in different range positions of driver includes:
Relatively through the meansigma methodss of standardization or consistency treatment, rate of failing to report and rate of false alarm and each corresponding default reference
Value is compared, and determines the evaluation result of driver according to comparative result, wherein,
Each reference value is standardized processing or consistency treatment;
If the underproof reference value of jth item index expression isθ j, the reference value of jth item qualified isJ reacts for driver
The test sequence number of ability;
The standardization of reference value is:
The unification of reference value is processed as:
8. according to claim 7 driver's respond method of testing it is characterised in that:According to comparative result determination department
The evaluation result of machine includes:
IfThen judge that i-th driver belongs to unqualified;
IfThen judge that i-th driver belongs to qualified;
Wherein I () is logical judgment function, and that is, expression formula takes 1 for true time;Otherwise take 0.
9. a kind of test system of driver's respond is it is characterised in that described system includes:
Analog picture control display unit, for, after receiving the instruction starting to test, controlling the simulation of display driver's seat
Picture;
Barrier analog image control display unit, for controlling asynchronous display in the analog picture of described driver's seat
At least two barrier analog images;
Reflex test unit, is used for judging whether to receive input information, and according to judged result and from described barrier mould
Intend the reflex test result that image occurs to the reaction duration receiving input information determining driver.
10. according to claim 9 the test system of driver's respond it is characterised in that described at least two obstacles
Thing analog image includes at least one default threat image and at least one default safe object image;
Reflex test unit includes:
First test cell, if for showing described threat image, and described input information is consistent with default reference information
When, the meansigma methodss of described reaction duration as the response speed parameter of described driver, if do not collect described input information,
Then it is incremented by for representing that what described driver failed to report to danger fail to report parameter;Or/and,
Second test cell, if for showing described safe object image, if collect described input information, be incremented by for table
Show the wrong report parameter that described driver reports by mistake to safe thing.
The test system of 11. driver's responds according to claim 9 is it is characterised in that described first test cell
It is additionally operable to as described driver, danger is leaked with the ratio of the described number of times failing to report parameter and the described threat image of display
The rate of failing to report of report;
Described second test cell be additionally operable to using described wrong report parameter with show described safe object image number of times ratio as
The rate of false alarm that described driver reports by mistake to safe thing.
12. according to claim 11 driver's respond test system it is characterised in that described barrier simulation drawing
As control display unit is additionally operable to control multiple default picture range positions in the analog picture of described driver's seat independent
Show one of described at least two barrier analog images;The plurality of default picture range position includes analog picture two
Side position and analog picture centre position;Or/and,
Described test system also includes target location control display unit, for controlling the analog picture in described driver's seat
Middle display travels fixation object position.
13. according to claim 12 driver's respond test system it is characterised in that the plurality of default picture
Range position is evenly distributed in described analog picture;
Described test system also includes:
Range test cell is used for basis and occurs in analog picture two side position and analog picture in described barrier analog image
The meansigma methodss of reaction duration in centre position, rate of failing to report and rate of false alarm determine the respond in different range positions of driver
Test result.
14. according to claim 13 driver's respond test system, also include:
Data processing unit, for entering rower to any one in the described meansigma methodss reacting duration, rate of failing to report and rate of false alarm
Standardization is processed or consistency treatment;
Assume that total n driver participates in test, total m item test index, if the jth item test value of i-th people is xij, wherein i=
1,2 ..., n, j=1,2 ..., m
Wherein, standardization is:
Note jth item test index sample average beSample variance isWherein j is
The test sequence number of driver's respond, then after standardization be:
Consistency treatment is:
Wherein Mj=max { yij, i=1,2 ..., n }, mj=min { yij, i=1,2 ..., n }, j=m1+1,m1+2,…,m1+m2.
15. according to claim 14 driver's respond test system it is characterised in that:Described range test cell
Also include:
Reference value processes subelement, is standardized processing or consistency treatment for each reference value;If jth item index expression is not
Qualified reference value isθ j, the reference value of jth item qualified isJ is the test sequence number of driver's respond;
The standardization of reference value is:
The unification of reference value is processed as:
Range tests subelement, be used for comparing through standardization or consistency treatment meansigma methodss, rate of failing to report and rate of false alarm with
Each correspond to default reference value to be compared, determine the evaluation result of driver according to comparative result,.
16. according to claim 15 driver's respond test system it is characterised in that:Range tests subelement bag
Include
Evaluation module, is used for:
IfThen judge that i-th driver belongs to unqualified;
IfThen judge that i-th driver belongs to qualified;
Wherein I () is logical judgment function, and that is, expression formula takes 1 for true time;Otherwise take 0.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610784528.1A CN106377272B (en) | 2016-08-30 | 2016-08-30 | The test method and system of driver's respond |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610784528.1A CN106377272B (en) | 2016-08-30 | 2016-08-30 | The test method and system of driver's respond |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN106377272A true CN106377272A (en) | 2017-02-08 |
CN106377272B CN106377272B (en) | 2019-07-26 |
Family
ID=57938770
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610784528.1A Active CN106377272B (en) | 2016-08-30 | 2016-08-30 | The test method and system of driver's respond |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN106377272B (en) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107220669A (en) * | 2017-05-27 | 2017-09-29 | 西南交通大学 | The method of testing and system of the behavior monitoring ability of dispatcher a kind of |
CN109637261A (en) * | 2019-01-16 | 2019-04-16 | 吉林大学 | Auto manual drives driver's respond training system under power handover situations |
CN111505664A (en) * | 2020-05-11 | 2020-08-07 | 中国人民解放军陆军研究院装甲兵研究所 | Test room based on obstacle test and test method |
CN112617834A (en) * | 2019-10-09 | 2021-04-09 | 辽宁师范大学 | Implementation method of driver danger perception test system |
EP3903159A4 (en) * | 2018-12-27 | 2022-09-28 | INTEL Corporation | Technologies for providing a cognitive capacity test for autonomous driving |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5488353A (en) * | 1993-01-06 | 1996-01-30 | Mitsubishi Jidosha Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Apparatus and method for improving the awareness of vehicle drivers |
CN1879135A (en) * | 2003-11-30 | 2006-12-13 | 沃尔沃技术公司 | Method and system for recognizing driver impairment |
CN101320523A (en) * | 2007-06-08 | 2008-12-10 | 沙乐工程公司 | Train travelling simulation system |
CN104000614A (en) * | 2014-06-09 | 2014-08-27 | 南通大学 | System and method for evaluating comprehensive quality of long-distance passenger transportation driver |
CN104517494A (en) * | 2014-12-29 | 2015-04-15 | 东莞市新雷神仿真控制有限公司 | System for testing brake reaction of driver |
-
2016
- 2016-08-30 CN CN201610784528.1A patent/CN106377272B/en active Active
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5488353A (en) * | 1993-01-06 | 1996-01-30 | Mitsubishi Jidosha Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Apparatus and method for improving the awareness of vehicle drivers |
CN1879135A (en) * | 2003-11-30 | 2006-12-13 | 沃尔沃技术公司 | Method and system for recognizing driver impairment |
CN101320523A (en) * | 2007-06-08 | 2008-12-10 | 沙乐工程公司 | Train travelling simulation system |
CN104000614A (en) * | 2014-06-09 | 2014-08-27 | 南通大学 | System and method for evaluating comprehensive quality of long-distance passenger transportation driver |
CN104517494A (en) * | 2014-12-29 | 2015-04-15 | 东莞市新雷神仿真控制有限公司 | System for testing brake reaction of driver |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107220669A (en) * | 2017-05-27 | 2017-09-29 | 西南交通大学 | The method of testing and system of the behavior monitoring ability of dispatcher a kind of |
EP3903159A4 (en) * | 2018-12-27 | 2022-09-28 | INTEL Corporation | Technologies for providing a cognitive capacity test for autonomous driving |
CN109637261A (en) * | 2019-01-16 | 2019-04-16 | 吉林大学 | Auto manual drives driver's respond training system under power handover situations |
CN109637261B (en) * | 2019-01-16 | 2021-08-24 | 吉林大学 | System for training reaction capability of driver under automatic-manual driving right switching situation |
CN112617834A (en) * | 2019-10-09 | 2021-04-09 | 辽宁师范大学 | Implementation method of driver danger perception test system |
CN111505664A (en) * | 2020-05-11 | 2020-08-07 | 中国人民解放军陆军研究院装甲兵研究所 | Test room based on obstacle test and test method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN106377272B (en) | 2019-07-26 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN106377272A (en) | Method and system for testing reaction capacity of driver | |
Pezdek et al. | Children's face recognition memory: more evidence for the cross-race effect. | |
US20220309944A1 (en) | Method for adjusting driving training course, electronic device, and storage medium | |
CN109887362B (en) | Man-machine interactive automatic display system for teaching | |
CN105608446A (en) | Video stream abnormal event detection method and apparatus | |
CN106056968A (en) | Parking space detection method based on optical image | |
CN106361357B (en) | Driving capability test method and system | |
CN107832890A (en) | A kind of congestion Forecasting Methodology and device | |
Clarke et al. | Classification accuracy of easyCBM first-grade mathematics measures: Findings and implications for the field | |
CN106355329A (en) | Method and system for testing sign aligning ability of driver | |
Gronlund et al. | Presentation methods. | |
CN107507114A (en) | A kind of Internet of Things teaching platform method of controlling security and device | |
Kim et al. | Using immersive augmented reality to assess the effectiveness of construction safety training | |
Prohn et al. | Potentially Critical Driving Situations During “Blue-light” Driving: A Video Analysis | |
CN115204678B (en) | Tourist evaluation analysis system based on scenic spot tourist platform | |
CN106388837A (en) | Test method and system for memory anti-interference capability of driver | |
JP4473744B2 (en) | Human error diagnosis system | |
CN113409635A (en) | Interactive teaching method and system based on virtual reality scene | |
CN106344050A (en) | Testing method and system for stress tolerance of driver | |
Arnegard | Operator strategies under varying conditions of workload | |
CN106344049A (en) | Testing method and system for driver space memory abilities | |
JP4255314B2 (en) | Human error diagnosis system | |
US20120196263A1 (en) | Interactive educational device and method of use | |
Blair | From the field: Can detection of deception response bias be manipulated? | |
Matthews | Realist criminology revisited |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |