CN106295134A - Energy storage technology and the coupling analytical method of energy storage standard - Google Patents
Energy storage technology and the coupling analytical method of energy storage standard Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106295134A CN106295134A CN201610614159.1A CN201610614159A CN106295134A CN 106295134 A CN106295134 A CN 106295134A CN 201610614159 A CN201610614159 A CN 201610614159A CN 106295134 A CN106295134 A CN 106295134A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- energy storage
- coupling
- storage technology
- technology
- standards
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16Z—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G16Z99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other main groups of this subclass
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
本发明提供了一种储能技术与储能标准的耦合分析方法,包括:确定储能技术评价指标和权重,形成储能技术评价指标体系;确定储能标准评价指标和权重,形成储能标准评价指标体系;建立储能技术与储能标准的耦合模型;原始数据标准化处理,代入耦合函数进行计算;计算结果参照相应标准进行比较,进行分析。本发明中的耦合分析方法建立了储能技术与储能标准之间的耦合模型,从很大程度上降低了储能技术与储能标准耦合分析的计算复杂度,极大地提高了计算效率,能够快速准确的找出影响我国储能产业发展的问题,提出储能产业发展方向建议,有利于我国储能技术与储能标准协调高速地达到世界领先水平。
The invention provides a coupling analysis method of energy storage technology and energy storage standards, including: determining the evaluation index and weight of energy storage technology to form an evaluation index system of energy storage technology; determining the evaluation index and weight of energy storage standards to form an energy storage standard Evaluation index system; establish a coupling model of energy storage technology and energy storage standards; standardize the original data and substitute it into the coupling function for calculation; compare and analyze the calculation results with reference to the corresponding standards. The coupling analysis method in the present invention establishes a coupling model between energy storage technology and energy storage standards, greatly reduces the computational complexity of energy storage technology and energy storage standard coupling analysis, and greatly improves calculation efficiency. Being able to quickly and accurately find out the problems that affect the development of my country's energy storage industry and put forward suggestions for the development direction of the energy storage industry will help my country's energy storage technology and energy storage standards to coordinate and quickly reach the world's leading level.
Description
技术领域technical field
本发明涉及耦合分析方法,具体地,涉及一种储能技术与储能标准的耦合分析方法。The invention relates to a coupling analysis method, in particular to a coupling analysis method of an energy storage technology and an energy storage standard.
背景技术Background technique
我国对于储能技术的研究相对于欧美国家和日本起步较晚,近年来,国家对于这一领域重视程度与日俱增,但是由于我国储能技术标准不健全,导致了我国在储能装置生产及应用环节都缺乏支撑,并不能满足应用需求。随着研究的深入,新技术、新应用场景将会不断出现,储能技术的发展与标准的耦合关系也将呈现动态变化。鉴于目前无论是储能技术本身,还是储能标准的制定都不够成熟,有较大的发展空间,为了提高储能标准制定的针对性,夯实储能标准的技术先进性,需要对二者的耦合关系进行分析。通过对储能技术的发展与储能标准的耦合关系进行分析,将会有利于我国储能标准体系的建立和储能标准的制定工作。储能标准的制定将会保障储能产业的健康发展,进一步促进储能技术的进步与创新,二者呈现良性动态发展过程将会是业界期望得到的结果。my country's research on energy storage technology started relatively late compared with Europe, the United States and Japan. In recent years, the country has paid more and more attention to this field. However, due to my country's unsound energy storage technology standards, my country's energy storage device production and application links Both lack support and cannot meet application requirements. With the deepening of research, new technologies and new application scenarios will continue to emerge, and the coupling relationship between the development of energy storage technology and standards will also show dynamic changes. In view of the fact that neither the energy storage technology itself nor the formulation of energy storage standards is mature enough, there is a large room for development. In order to improve the pertinence of energy storage standards and consolidate the technological advancement of energy storage standards, it is necessary to improve Analyze coupling relationships. By analyzing the coupling relationship between the development of energy storage technology and energy storage standards, it will be beneficial to the establishment of my country's energy storage standard system and the formulation of energy storage standards. The establishment of energy storage standards will ensure the healthy development of the energy storage industry and further promote the progress and innovation of energy storage technology. The benign dynamic development process of the two will be the result expected by the industry.
储能技术与储能标准的耦合分析涉及评价体系、评价模型的建立,但是目前国内对于这方面的研究尚且处于空白。对于二者的耦合分析,急需解决的技术问题在于需要深入了解目前的储能技术、储能标准发展现状、发展趋势及发展需求后,确定评价体系中的评价指标,确定评价模型中的评价函数。The coupling analysis of energy storage technology and energy storage standards involves the establishment of evaluation systems and evaluation models, but domestic research on this aspect is still blank. For the coupling analysis of the two, the technical problem that needs to be solved urgently is to determine the evaluation index in the evaluation system and the evaluation function in the evaluation model after deeply understanding the current energy storage technology, energy storage standard development status, development trend and development demand .
发明内容Contents of the invention
针对现有技术中的缺陷,本发明的目的是提供一种储能技术与储能标准的耦合分析方法。In view of the defects in the prior art, the purpose of the present invention is to provide a coupling analysis method of energy storage technology and energy storage standards.
根据本发明提供的储能技术与储能标准的耦合分析方法,包括如下步骤:According to the coupling analysis method of energy storage technology and energy storage standard provided by the present invention, it includes the following steps:
步骤1:建立储能技术评价指标体系,根据构建指标体系科学化、规范化的原则,结合储能技术发展现状,将储能技术的评价指标体系分为技术性指标体系、经济性指标体系以及对环境的影响性指标体系三大类;Step 1: Establish the evaluation index system of energy storage technology. According to the principle of scientific and standardized construction of the index system, combined with the development status of energy storage technology, the evaluation index system of energy storage technology is divided into technical index system, economic index system and environmental protection index system. There are three categories of influential index systems;
步骤2:建立储能标准评价指标体系,所述评价体系包括:技术水平子系统、协调配套性子系统、结构和内容子系统以及应用程度子系统;Step 2: Establish an evaluation index system for energy storage standards, the evaluation system includes: technical level subsystem, coordination supporting subsystem, structure and content subsystem, and application degree subsystem;
步骤3:对原始数据进行标准化处理;Step 3: standardize the raw data;
步骤4:将处理后的数据代入耦合函数进行计算,获得耦合度和耦合协调度的值,并分析储能技术与储能标准的耦合关系。Step 4: Substitute the processed data into the coupling function for calculation, obtain the values of coupling degree and coupling coordination degree, and analyze the coupling relationship between energy storage technology and energy storage standards.
优选地,所述步骤3包括:将数据按设定比例缩放,使得数据落入到一个较小的特定区间,这里用0-1区间,即所有数据的值都在0-1之间,且为无量纲的纯数值;具体处理的公式如下:Preferably, the step 3 includes: scaling the data according to a set ratio, so that the data falls into a smaller specific interval, here the 0-1 interval is used, that is, the values of all data are between 0-1, and It is a dimensionless pure value; the formula for specific processing is as follows:
正向指标标准化: Standardization of positive indicators:
负向指标标准化: Normalization of negative indicators:
式中,xi’表示第i个原始指标的标准值,xi表示第i个指标的原始数据,xmax、xmin分别表示原始指标的最大值和最小值。In the formula, x i ' represents the standard value of the i-th original index, x i represents the original data of the i-th index, and x max and x min represent the maximum and minimum values of the original index, respectively.
优选地,所述步骤4中利用耦合函数的计算过程如下:Preferably, the calculation process using the coupling function in the step 4 is as follows:
其中:i=1,2Where: i=1,2
T=αu1+βu2;T=αu 1 +βu 2 ;
式中:u1、u2分别表示储能技术、储能标准的评价水平,u1j、u2j分别表示储能技术评价体系、储能标准评价体系中第j个指标的数值,w1j、w2j分别表示储能技术评价体系、储能标准评价体系中第j个指标的权重,C表示u1、u2的耦合度,C∈[0,1];C的值越大表示储能技术和储能标准之间的耦合度越好,当C=0时说明二者处于无关联状态;当C=1时说明二者处于最佳耦合状态;T表示储能技术、储能标准的综合评价指数,α、β为待定系数,能够根据技术、标准的重要程度进行确定;D表示耦合协调度,D∈[0,1],D的值越大,表示储能技术与储能标准水平整体耦合发展程度越高。In the formula: u 1 , u 2 represent the evaluation levels of energy storage technology and energy storage standards respectively, u 1j , u 2j represent the value of the jth index in the energy storage technology evaluation system and energy storage standard evaluation system respectively, w 1j , w 2j respectively represent the weight of the jth index in the energy storage technology evaluation system and the energy storage standard evaluation system, C represents the coupling degree of u 1 and u 2 , C∈[0,1]; the larger the value of C, the greater the energy storage The better the coupling between the technology and the energy storage standard, when C=0, it means that the two are in an unrelated state; when C=1, it means that the two are in the best coupling state; T represents the energy storage technology and energy storage standard. Comprehensive evaluation index, α and β are undetermined coefficients, which can be determined according to the importance of technology and standards; D represents the degree of coupling coordination, D∈[0,1], the larger the value of D, the greater the energy storage technology and energy storage standard The higher the level of overall coupling development.
优选地,根据技术、标准的重要程度设置α=0.6,β=0.4。Preferably, α=0.6 and β=0.4 are set according to the importance of technology and standards.
优选地,步骤1中的所述技术性指标体系包括:容量、密度、寿命、效率四个子指标;所述经济性指标体系包括:初始投资、固定运维成本以及可变运维成本三个子指标;对环境的影响指标体系包括:安全性、环保性两个子指标;Preferably, the technical index system in step 1 includes: four sub-indices of capacity, density, service life, and efficiency; the economical index system includes: three sub-indices of initial investment, fixed operation and maintenance cost, and variable operation and maintenance cost; The impact index system on the environment includes: two sub-indices of safety and environmental protection;
其中:安全性用于评估储能技术运行的安全稳定性,环保性用于评价一项储能技术是否绿色环保,是否对环境产生污染或者对生态环境造成影响。Among them: safety is used to evaluate the safety and stability of energy storage technology operation, and environmental protection is used to evaluate whether an energy storage technology is green and environmentally friendly, whether it will pollute the environment or affect the ecological environment.
优选地,还包括步骤5:根据步骤4得出的储能技术与储能标准的耦合关系制定相应的储能标准。Preferably, step 5 is also included: formulate corresponding energy storage standards according to the coupling relationship between energy storage technology and energy storage standards obtained in step 4.
与现有技术相比,本发明具有如下的有益效果:Compared with the prior art, the present invention has the following beneficial effects:
本发明中的该耦合分析方法建立了储能技术与储能标准耦合分析的评价体系和评价模型,填补了我国在这方面的技术空白,为他人后续进行相关研究提供了参照;该耦合分析方法极大地简化二者之间的耦合分析过程,降低了计算复杂度,有利于直观地发现我国储能产业发展中存在的问题,便于后续进行针对性地研究,有利于促进储能技术与储能标准朝着协同耦合关系的方向发展。The coupling analysis method in the present invention establishes an evaluation system and an evaluation model for the coupling analysis of energy storage technology and energy storage standards, fills the technical gap in this area in our country, and provides a reference for others to conduct subsequent related research; the coupling analysis method It greatly simplifies the coupling analysis process between the two, reduces the computational complexity, and helps to intuitively discover the problems existing in the development of my country's energy storage industry, facilitates subsequent targeted research, and is conducive to promoting energy storage technology and energy storage. Standards are moving in the direction of collaborative coupling relationships.
附图说明Description of drawings
通过阅读参照以下附图对非限制性实施例所作的详细描述,本发明的其它特征、目的和优点将会变得更明显:Other characteristics, objects and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent by reading the detailed description of non-limiting embodiments made with reference to the following drawings:
图1为本发明提供的能技术与储能标准的耦合分析方法流程示意图;Fig. 1 is a schematic flow chart of the coupling analysis method of energy technology and energy storage standard provided by the present invention;
图2为储能技术评价指标体系示意图;Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of the energy storage technology evaluation index system;
图3为储能技术指标权重设置示意图;Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of the weight setting of energy storage technical indicators;
图4为储能标准评价指标体系示意图;Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of the energy storage standard evaluation index system;
图5为储能标准指标权重设置示意图。Figure 5 is a schematic diagram of the weight setting of energy storage standard indicators.
具体实施方式detailed description
下面结合具体实施例对本发明进行详细说明。以下实施例将有助于本领域的技术人员进一步理解本发明,但不以任何形式限制本发明。应当指出的是,对本领域的普通技术人员来说,在不脱离本发明构思的前提下,还可以做出若干变化和改进。这些都属于本发明的保护范围。The present invention will be described in detail below in conjunction with specific embodiments. The following examples will help those skilled in the art to further understand the present invention, but do not limit the present invention in any form. It should be noted that those skilled in the art can make several changes and improvements without departing from the concept of the present invention. These all belong to the protection scope of the present invention.
根据本发明提供的储能技术与储能标准的耦合分析方法,包括如下步骤:According to the coupling analysis method of energy storage technology and energy storage standard provided by the present invention, it includes the following steps:
步骤1:建立储能技术评价指标体系,根据构建指标体系科学化、规范化的原则,结合储能技术发展现状,将储能技术的评价指标体系分为技术性A、经济性B和对环境的影响C三大类。Step 1: Establish the evaluation index system of energy storage technology. According to the principle of scientific and standardized construction of the index system, combined with the development status of energy storage technology, the evaluation index system of energy storage technology is divided into technical A, economical B and impact on the environment C three categories.
其中,技术指标下又包含容量A1、密度A2、寿命A3、效率A4四个子指标,对储能技术的一些基本技术特征进行评价;经济性指标包含初始投资B1、固定运维成本B2和可变运维成本B3三个子指标,对储能技术进行经济型评估;对环境的影响包含安全性C1、环保性C2两个子指标,安全性主要是评估储能技术运行的安全稳定性,环保性主要评价一项储能技术是否绿色环保,是否对环境产生污染或者对生态环境造成影响。储能技术评价指标体系如图2所示。各指标权重的设置实际应用中可通过召开专家研讨会、厂商问卷调查、用户意见反馈等多种渠道,综合研究确定各影响因素的相对重要性后得出,暂将各指标权重设置如图3所示。Among them, the technical indicators include four sub-indices of capacity A1, density A2, life A3, and efficiency A4, which evaluate some basic technical characteristics of energy storage technology; economic indicators include initial investment B1, fixed operation and maintenance costs B2 and variable The three sub-indices of operation and maintenance cost B3 are for economical evaluation of energy storage technology; the impact on the environment includes two sub-indices of safety C1 and environmental protection C2. Safety is mainly to evaluate the safety and stability of energy storage technology operation, and environmental protection is mainly Evaluate whether an energy storage technology is green and environmentally friendly, whether it pollutes the environment or affects the ecological environment. The evaluation index system of energy storage technology is shown in Figure 2. In practical application, the weight setting of each index can be obtained after comprehensive research and determination of the relative importance of each influencing factor through various channels such as expert seminars, manufacturer questionnaire surveys, and user feedback. The weight setting of each index is temporarily set as shown in Figure 3 shown.
步骤2:建立储能标准评价指标体系,结合层次分析法和专家咨询法确定。该评价体系分为技术水平A、协调配套性B、结构和内容C、应用程度D四个子系统。Step 2: Establish an energy storage standard evaluation index system, which is determined by combining the analytic hierarchy process and expert consultation method. The evaluation system is divided into four subsystems: technical level A, coordination and matching B, structure and content C, and application level D.
其中,技术水平类包含与我国生产水平相比的适应性A1,考察标准所规定的技术水平与当前我国在储能领域的主流研究水平、设计水平、工艺水平、生产水平等相比是否适应;与国际标准水平相比的先进性A2,考察我国储能标准的整体技术水平与国际标准水平相比是否先进;结构和内容包含结构合理性C1,该指标仅从是否需要整合的角度考察标准的机构合理性;内容合理性C2重点考察储能标准的技术内容上存在的问题。应用程度D指标主要考察标准当前被多大比率的用户所使用。储能标准评价体系如图4,各指标的权重设置依然采取专家咨询法进行确定,各指标权重设置如图5。Among them, the category of technical level includes adaptability A1 compared with the production level in my country, which examines whether the technical level stipulated in the standard is suitable for comparison with the current mainstream research level, design level, process level, production level, etc. in the field of energy storage in my country; Advancedness A2 compared with the international standard level, which examines whether the overall technical level of my country's energy storage standards is advanced compared with the international standard level; structure and content include structural rationality C1, this indicator only examines the standard from the perspective of whether it needs to be integrated Institutional rationality; content rationality C2 focuses on the problems existing in the technical content of energy storage standards. The application degree D indicator mainly examines how many users the standard is currently using. The energy storage standard evaluation system is shown in Figure 4. The weight setting of each indicator is still determined by the expert consultation method, and the weight setting of each indicator is shown in Figure 5.
步骤3:原始数据标准化处理。储能技术和储能标准评价指标体系都是由若干个指标组成的,由于各评价指标的性质不同,这些指标具有不同的量纲和数量级。当各指标间的水平相差很大时,如果直接用原始指标值进行分析,就会突出数值较高的指标在综合分析中的作用,相对削弱数值水平较低指标的作用。因此,为了保证结果的可靠性,在将数据带入耦合模型计算之前,首先要对数据进行标准化处理。Step 3: Standardize the original data. The evaluation index system of energy storage technology and energy storage standards is composed of several indexes. Due to the different nature of each evaluation index, these indexes have different dimensions and orders of magnitude. When the levels of various indicators differ greatly, if the original indicator values are directly used for analysis, the role of indicators with higher numerical levels in the comprehensive analysis will be highlighted, and the role of indicators with lower numerical levels will be relatively weakened. Therefore, in order to ensure the reliability of the results, the data should first be standardized before being brought into the coupled model calculation.
所述步骤3中的数据标准化处理,就是将数据按一定比例缩放,使之落入到一个小的特定区间。常用的一种方法是落到0-1区间,也叫做数据的归一化处理。其公式如下:The data standardization processing in step 3 is to scale the data according to a certain ratio so that it falls into a small specific interval. A commonly used method is to fall into the 0-1 interval, which is also called the normalization of data. Its formula is as follows:
正向指标标准化: Standardization of positive indicators:
负向指标标准化: Normalization of negative indicators:
其中,xi’表示原始指标的标准值,xi表示指标的原始数据,xmax、xmin分别表示原始指标的最大值和最小值。由公式可以看出,经过数据的归一化处理,所有指标的值都在0-1之间,并且是无量纲的纯数值,便于后续实例分析中对数据进行加权计算。Among them, x i ' represents the standard value of the original index, x i represents the original data of the index, x max and x min represent the maximum value and minimum value of the original index, respectively. It can be seen from the formula that after the normalization of the data, the values of all indicators are between 0 and 1, and they are dimensionless pure values, which is convenient for weighted calculation of the data in the subsequent case analysis.
步骤4:耦合计算分析。将处理后的数据代入耦合函数进行计算,并对结果进行分析。Step 4: Coupling calculation analysis. Substitute the processed data into the coupling function for calculation, and analyze the results.
所述步骤4中耦合函数的分析如下:The analysis of the coupling function in the step 4 is as follows:
令u1、u2分别表示储能技术、储能标准的评价水平,令u1j、u2j分别表示储能技术评价体系、储能标准评价体系的第j个指标的数值,由原始数据根据指标标准化公式计算得出,令w1j、w2j分别表示储能技术评价体系、储能标准评价体系中第j个指标的权重。则利用线性加权法,可以对储能技术、储能标准水平进行测算:Let u 1 and u 2 represent the evaluation levels of energy storage technology and energy storage standards respectively, and let u 1j and u 2j represent the value of the jth index of the energy storage technology evaluation system and energy storage standard evaluation system respectively. The index standardization formula is calculated, let w 1j and w 2j denote the weight of the jth index in the energy storage technology evaluation system and the energy storage standard evaluation system respectively. Then, the linear weighting method can be used to calculate the energy storage technology and energy storage standard level:
可以分别得到储能技术和储能标准的综合发展水平u1、u2,基于此进行两者间耦合函数计算。The comprehensive development levels u 1 and u 2 of energy storage technology and energy storage standards can be obtained respectively, based on which the coupling function calculation between the two can be performed.
借鉴物理学中的耦合度函数,并在相关研究的基础上,给出储能技术与储能标准之间耦合度公式为:Referring to the coupling degree function in physics, and on the basis of related research, the coupling degree formula between energy storage technology and energy storage standards is given as:
T=αu1+βu2 (5)T=αu 1 +βu 2 (5)
其中,C表示二者耦合度,C∈[0,1],且越大表示储能技术和储能标准之间的耦合度越好,当C=0时说明二者处于无关联状态;当C=1时说明二者处于最佳耦合状态。T为储能技术、储能标准的综合评价指数,反映储能产业的整体发展水平,α、β为待定系数,根据技术、标准的重要程度,暂定α=0.6,β=0.4。这个取值反映的是储能产业发展过程中,储能技术的重要程度稍稍大于储能标准,可根据实际判断标准进行调整。D是耦合协调度,由于耦合度只能说明两个系统间相互作用程度的强弱,无法反映整个系统协调发展水平的高低,故引入耦合协调理论对两个系统的耦合协调程度进行评价,用于反映我国储能技术与储能标准交互耦合的整体协调发展水平。D∈[0,1],D的值越大,表示储能技术与储能水平整体耦合发展程度越高,这样有效避免了低储能技术水平与低储能标准水平得出高耦合值难以反映储能技术、标准整体水平的弊端。Among them, C represents the degree of coupling between the two, C∈[0,1], and the larger the degree of coupling between the energy storage technology and the energy storage standard, the better the coupling degree between the energy storage technology and the energy storage standard. When C=0, it means that the two are in an unrelated state; when When C=1, it shows that the two are in the best coupling state. T is the comprehensive evaluation index of energy storage technology and energy storage standards, which reflects the overall development level of the energy storage industry. α and β are undetermined coefficients. According to the importance of technology and standards, α=0.6 and β=0.4 are tentatively determined. This value reflects that in the development process of the energy storage industry, the importance of energy storage technology is slightly greater than the energy storage standard, and it can be adjusted according to the actual judgment standard. D is the coupling coordination degree. Since the coupling degree can only indicate the strength of the interaction between the two systems, it cannot reflect the level of coordinated development of the entire system. Therefore, the coupling coordination theory is introduced to evaluate the coupling coordination degree of the two systems. It reflects the overall coordinated development level of the interaction coupling between energy storage technology and energy storage standards in my country. D∈[0,1], the larger the value of D, the higher the overall coupling development degree of energy storage technology and energy storage level, which effectively avoids the difficulty of obtaining a high coupling value with low energy storage technology level and low energy storage standard level. Reflect the disadvantages of energy storage technology and the overall level of standards.
实施例Example
根据前文所建立的储能技术评价体系、储能标准评价体系和耦合模型,利用收集到的相关数据对储能技术与储能标准间耦合度进行测算。According to the energy storage technology evaluation system, energy storage standard evaluation system and coupling model established above, the coupling degree between energy storage technology and energy storage standards is calculated by using the collected relevant data.
由于储能技术发展时间较短,国内外相关数据资料较为缺乏,但项目研究更侧重于模型与解决问题方法思路的提出,因此下文暂以目前收集到的数据为例进行方法的展示,以期能够为未来储能推广应用,数据资料不断丰富情况下开展相关研究提供参考。Due to the short development time of energy storage technology and the lack of relevant data at home and abroad, but the project research is more focused on the proposal of the model and the idea of solving the problem, so the following will temporarily use the currently collected data as an example to demonstrate the method, in order to be able to It provides a reference for future energy storage promotion and application and relevant research under the condition of continuous enrichment of data.
(1)首先,对储能技术进行评价。这里选择对抽水储能、蓄电池储能、飞轮储能、超导磁储能、超级电容器储能、压缩空气储能目前主流的六种储能技术分别进行评价,然后取平均值作为储能技术系统的最终评价结果。收集到的原始数据如表1所示。(1) First, evaluate the energy storage technology. Here, we choose to evaluate the six current mainstream energy storage technologies of pumped water storage, battery energy storage, flywheel energy storage, superconducting magnetic energy storage, supercapacitor energy storage, and compressed air energy storage, and then take the average value as the energy storage technology The final evaluation result of the system. The collected raw data are shown in Table 1.
表1储能技术原始数据Table 1 Raw data of energy storage technology
对原始数据进行标准化处理,并根据各个指标的权重对处理后的数据进行处理后,结果如表2所示:After standardizing the original data and processing the processed data according to the weight of each indicator, the results are shown in Table 2:
表2标准化处理后储能技术评价指标Table 2 Evaluation indicators of energy storage technology after standardized treatment
对六种储能技术的评价结果取平均值,得到储能技术的综合评价结果为u1=0.4481。Taking the average value of the evaluation results of the six energy storage technologies, the comprehensive evaluation result of the energy storage technologies is u 1 =0.4481.
(2)然后,对储能标准进行评价。暂选择目前我国已经制定的在储能领域比较具有代表性的《储能系统接入配电网技术规定》、《储能系统接入配电网测试规范》、《储能系统接入配电网运行控制规范》三个标准为对象,分别进行评价,然后取评价结果的平均值作为储能标准系统的综合评价结果。采用专家打分法,参考相关技术标准体系评价要求,确定储能标准各个指标的评价值,对数据进行标准化处理后得到结果如表3所示。(2) Then, evaluate the energy storage standard. Temporarily select the representative "Technical Regulations for Energy Storage System Connected to Distribution Network", "Test Specifications for Energy Storage System Connected to Distribution Network" and "Energy Storage System Connected to Power Distribution Network" that have been formulated in my country in the field of energy storage. The three standards of the Grid Operation Control Specification are used as objects, and the evaluation is carried out separately, and then the average value of the evaluation results is taken as the comprehensive evaluation result of the energy storage standard system. Using the expert scoring method and referring to the evaluation requirements of the relevant technical standard system, the evaluation value of each index of the energy storage standard is determined, and the results are shown in Table 3 after standardizing the data.
表3标准化后的储能标准评价指标Table 3 Standardized evaluation indicators of energy storage standards
对上述三个标准的评价结果取平均值,得到储能标准的综合评价结果u2=0.715。得到储能技术系统和储能标准系统的评价值后,根据耦合模型,可以得到二者耦合度C=0.9733,综合评价指数T=0.5549,耦合协调度D=0.7349。The evaluation results of the above three standards are averaged, and the comprehensive evaluation result of the energy storage standard is u 2 =0.715. After obtaining the evaluation values of the energy storage technology system and the energy storage standard system, according to the coupling model, the coupling degree C=0.9733, the comprehensive evaluation index T=0.5549, and the coupling coordination degree D=0.7349 can be obtained.
对于储能技术系统的评价指数u1=0.4481这个结果,还是比较直观的反映了目前我国储能技术尚且不够成熟的现状,表2中计算结果表明只有抽水储能这一技术相对成熟达到了可以商业化运营的程度。The result of the evaluation index u 1 =0.4481 of the energy storage technology system directly reflects the current situation that China’s energy storage technology is not yet mature enough. The calculation results in Table 2 show that only the pumped energy storage technology is relatively mature and can reach degree of commercialization.
至于储能标准系统评价指数u2=0.715这一结果,应该更为客观地分析,该指标数值并不能表明我国目前在储能标准领域已经十分领先了,从各指标具体数值中不难看出,这些标准在应用程度、协调配套性、结构合理性方面评价较高,而在内容合理性的评价方面则得分较低,与国际标准相比较的先进性评价也比较低。As for the result of the energy storage standard system evaluation index u 2 =0.715, it should be analyzed more objectively. The value of this index does not mean that China is already very advanced in the field of energy storage standards. It is not difficult to see from the specific values of each index that These standards are highly evaluated in terms of application degree, coordination and matching, and structural rationality, but low in evaluation of content rationality, and relatively low in advanced evaluation compared with international standards.
目前,仅从耦合度计算结果来看,储能技术系统与储能标准系统二者之间耦合还是比较高的,但是从就综合评价指数而言,目前我国储能产业还处于比较低的发展水平。储能技术系统与储能标准系统耦合协调度的绝对等级评价标准如表4所示。At present, only from the calculation results of the coupling degree, the coupling between the energy storage technology system and the energy storage standard system is still relatively high, but in terms of the comprehensive evaluation index, my country's energy storage industry is still at a relatively low level of development. Level. The absolute grade evaluation criteria of the coupling coordination degree between the energy storage technology system and the energy storage standard system are shown in Table 4.
表4耦合协调度绝对等级评价表Table 4 Absolute grade evaluation table of coupling coordination degree
对照计算得到的储能技术与储能标准的耦合协调度D=0.7349,从耦合协调度的绝对等级评价标准表中可以看出,二者目前处于一个中级协调的水平Compared with the calculated coupling coordination degree of energy storage technology and energy storage standard D=0.7349, it can be seen from the absolute grade evaluation standard table of coupling coordination degree that the two are currently at an intermediate level of coordination
从整个储能技术与储能标准耦合度分析的结果来看,目前我国储能技术与储能标准耦合较好,仍有上升空间,二者之间的协同耦合关系可以进一步加强,促进良性耦合。Judging from the results of the analysis of the coupling degree of the entire energy storage technology and energy storage standards, my country's energy storage technology and energy storage standards are currently well coupled, and there is still room for improvement. The synergistic coupling relationship between the two can be further strengthened to promote benign coupling .
在实例计算中,储能技术系统和标准系统的评价结果都比较低。储能技术系统评价结果低,主要原因在于我国目前在储能领域的技术依旧是十分落后的。相比较于美国、日本等在储能领域处于领先地位的国家,国内对于新兴的储能技术研究起步比较晚而且力度不够,应该予以重视,防止日后被其他国家在这个领域形成技术壁垒。对于储能标准系统评价结果低这个现状,可以从评价结果中看到标准先进性指标评价很低,现实是我国目前制定储能标准往往都需要参照国外早就制定好的标准,这样不仅仅会导致制定的标准可能难以跟最新的技术同步,内容上难以做到与时俱进,而且使得我国很难在储能领域掌握话语权,以后很可能丢失很大的市场。因此加强我国制定储能标准的积极性和主动性也是十分必要的。In the example calculation, the evaluation results of the energy storage technology system and the standard system are relatively low. The main reason for the low evaluation results of energy storage technology system is that my country's current technology in the field of energy storage is still very backward. Compared with the leading countries in the field of energy storage, such as the United States and Japan, domestic research on emerging energy storage technology started relatively late and is not strong enough, so attention should be paid to prevent technical barriers in this field from being formed by other countries in the future. Regarding the status quo of the low evaluation results of the energy storage standard system, it can be seen from the evaluation results that the standard advanced index evaluation is very low. The reality is that my country's current energy storage standards often need to refer to standards that have been formulated long ago in foreign countries. As a result, it may be difficult for the formulated standards to keep pace with the latest technology, and it is difficult to keep pace with the times in terms of content. It also makes it difficult for our country to have the right to speak in the field of energy storage, and it is likely to lose a large market in the future. Therefore, it is also necessary to strengthen the enthusiasm and initiative of our country to formulate energy storage standards.
以上对本发明的具体实施例进行了描述。需要理解的是,本发明并不局限于上述特定实施方式,本领域技术人员可以在权利要求的范围内做出各种变化或修改,这并不影响本发明的实质内容。在不冲突的情况下,本申请的实施例和实施例中的特征可以任意相互组合。Specific embodiments of the present invention have been described above. It should be understood that the present invention is not limited to the specific embodiments described above, and those skilled in the art may make various changes or modifications within the scope of the claims, which do not affect the essence of the present invention. In the case of no conflict, the embodiments of the present application and the features in the embodiments can be combined with each other arbitrarily.
Claims (6)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610614159.1A CN106295134A (en) | 2016-07-29 | 2016-07-29 | Energy storage technology and the coupling analytical method of energy storage standard |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610614159.1A CN106295134A (en) | 2016-07-29 | 2016-07-29 | Energy storage technology and the coupling analytical method of energy storage standard |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN106295134A true CN106295134A (en) | 2017-01-04 |
Family
ID=57663016
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610614159.1A Pending CN106295134A (en) | 2016-07-29 | 2016-07-29 | Energy storage technology and the coupling analytical method of energy storage standard |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN106295134A (en) |
-
2016
- 2016-07-29 CN CN201610614159.1A patent/CN106295134A/en active Pending
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN105512799B (en) | Power system transient stability evaluation method based on mass online historical data | |
| CN106505593B (en) | A kind of analysis of distribution transforming three-phase imbalance and the method for load adjustment based on big data | |
| CN102663501A (en) | Smart grid evaluation system and method | |
| CN106548272A (en) | A kind of electric automobile fills the evaluation methodology of facility combination property soon | |
| CN105046591A (en) | Method for evaluating electricity utilization energy efficiency of power consumer | |
| CN107274047A (en) | A kind of power network method of post project evaluation based on multilevel extension assessment method | |
| CN105574632A (en) | Method for evaluating comprehensive benefits of AC/DC hybrid urban distribution network | |
| CN106709821A (en) | Main component analysis-based power supply reliability evaluation method of medium-voltage power distribution network | |
| CN103617447B (en) | The evaluation system of intelligent substation and evaluation methodology | |
| CN106548413A (en) | A kind of power system energy storage fitness-for-service assessment method and system | |
| CN110458449A (en) | Evaluation method for coordinated development of regional comprehensive energy supply system | |
| CN106056235A (en) | Power transmission grid efficiency and benefit detection method based on Klee method and matter element extension model | |
| CN106899035B (en) | Method and device for evaluating operation efficiency of power distribution network after inverter system participates in grid connection | |
| CN108009963A (en) | Economic transition development and energy demand relevance assessment system based on gray theory | |
| CN104268703A (en) | Method for evaluating power load change after making demand responses | |
| CN107944747A (en) | A kind of low-voltage platform area evaluation method based on improvement principal component analysis | |
| CN109389272A (en) | A kind of comprehensive estimation method and system for voltage coordination control strategy effect | |
| CN115330125A (en) | Energy Internet-oriented distributed power consumption metering evaluation method and system | |
| CN106295134A (en) | Energy storage technology and the coupling analytical method of energy storage standard | |
| CN103473450A (en) | Attribute interval identification method for intelligent power distribution network efficiency evaluation | |
| Du et al. | Comprehensive energy efficiency evaluation of municipal power grid based on TOPSIS method | |
| CN108205720A (en) | A kind of power consumer credit estimation method and system based on index degree of variation | |
| CN104063812A (en) | Method for evaluating low voltage ride-through performance of wind-solar complementary power generation system | |
| CN105631595A (en) | Method for obtaining coordination degree of power grid and economic level | |
| Wang et al. | Evaluation System of Substation Based on AHP-EWM and Matter-element Extension Theory |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20170104 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |