CN106295042A - A kind of coal seam top rock stability Quantitative Evaluation with Well Logging method - Google Patents
A kind of coal seam top rock stability Quantitative Evaluation with Well Logging method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106295042A CN106295042A CN201610681994.7A CN201610681994A CN106295042A CN 106295042 A CN106295042 A CN 106295042A CN 201610681994 A CN201610681994 A CN 201610681994A CN 106295042 A CN106295042 A CN 106295042A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- roof
- stability
- rock
- coal seam
- index
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 239000003245 coal Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 94
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 86
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 34
- 238000011158 quantitative evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 14
- 208000010392 Bone Fractures Diseases 0.000 claims abstract description 26
- 206010017076 Fracture Diseases 0.000 claims abstract description 26
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000005065 mining Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000010219 correlation analysis Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000004445 quantitative analysis Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 abstract description 3
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005251 gamma ray Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000008187 granular material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000004575 stone Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003466 anti-cipated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000941 radioactive substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010454 slate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/02—Agriculture; Fishing; Forestry; Mining
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Animal Husbandry (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Marine Sciences & Fisheries (AREA)
Abstract
A kind of coal seam top rock stability logging evaluation evaluation methodology, first calculate coal roof lithologic coefficient, calculate the porosity of roof again, then roof fracture development index is calculated, then roof moisture content is calculated, then calculate roof comprcssive strength, then build coal seam top rock stability Quantitative Evaluation with Well Logging model, last Appraisal of Stability of Coal Seam Roof Index for Calculation;The present invention is based on coal roof lithologic coefficient, porosity, fracture development index, the property of water-bearing and comprcssive strength parameter, construct Appraisal of Stability of Coal Seam Roof index well logging quantitative calculation, with this computation model, Appraisal of Stability of Coal Seam Roof index is calculated, borehole logging technical support will be provided for safety of coal mines exploitation.
Description
Technical field
The invention belongs to the borehole logging assessment technique in process of coal mining, particularly to a kind of coal seam top rock stability
Quantitative Evaluation with Well Logging method.
Background technology
In order to assess the stability of roof, it is an object of the invention to provide a kind of coal seam top rock stability well logging
Method for quantitatively evaluating.Affect bigger lithologic character and comprcssive strength based on coal seam top rock stability, and fully take into account top
The porosity of slate layer, moisture content and development degree of micro cracks in oil this objectively quality factor relatively big to stability influence, divides in system
Analysis lithology factor, porosity, moisture content, internal relation between fracture development index and comprcssive strength and coal seam top rock stability it
After, establish Appraisal of Stability of Coal Seam Roof index well logging computation model.This model has considered coal seam from many aspects
Five indexs that roof stability impact is bigger, therefore, this evaluation methodology more can accurately characterize the stability of roof
Can, and then can be that safety of coal mines exploitation provides logging technique support.
In actual production, for safe working colliery, it is necessary to the stability of assessment roof.It is said that in general, coal seam
Directly top is for thick-layer tight sand, and during without crack, then comprcssive strength is big, good stability;If directly top is mud stone or hole
The sandstone that gap is good, and during containing crack, then comprcssive strength is low, poor stability.
How existing Appraisal of Stability of Coal Seam Roof method, evaluate according to the comprcssive strength of rock stratum, some evaluation methodology
Have also contemplated that the impact on stability of lithologic character and moisture content.It practice, the stability of roof is not only with anti-
Compressive Strength, lithologic character are relevant with moisture content, and relevant with porosity and fracture development index.But, existing patent does not has
Have in view of porosity, the impact of fracture development exponent pair coal seam top rock stability energy.Additionally, existing coal seam top rock stability is commented
In valency, the most do not make full use of coalfield borehole logging data to calculate coal roof lithologic coefficient, porosity, fracture development refer to
Number, moisture content and comprcssive strength, and then the stability of roof is carried out Quantitative Evaluation with Well Logging, this gives colliery safe working
Detail design is made troubles.
Summary of the invention
In order to overcome above-mentioned existing methodical deficiency, it is an object of the invention to provide a kind of coal seam top rock stability well logging
Evaluate evaluation methodology, based on coal roof lithologic coefficient, porosity, fracture development index, the property of water-bearing and comprcssive strength parameter, structure
Build Appraisal of Stability of Coal Seam Roof index well logging quantitative calculation, with this computation model, Appraisal of Stability of Coal Seam Roof has been referred to
Number calculates, and will provide borehole logging technical support for safety of coal mines exploitation.
In order to achieve the above object, the technical scheme is that
A kind of coal seam top rock stability logging evaluation evaluation methodology, comprises the following steps:
Step one, calculating coal roof lithologic coefficient: use equation (1) to ask for relative natural gamma, and then utilize relatively
The rock particle diameter that natural gamma and laboratory record carries out correlation analysis, asks for the particle diameter of roof rock, and then utilizes
Rock particle diameter and shale content build coal roof lithologic coefficient calculations model, specific as follows:
Md=-0.124 Δ GR+0.248 (2)
In formula: Δ GR is relative natural gamma, dimensionless;GR、GRmax、GRminIt is respectively computation layer point, pure shale, sharp sand
The natural gamma value of rock, API;MdFor rock particle diameter, mm;IlFor coal roof lithologic coefficient, dimensionless;VshFor shale content,
Decimal;GCUR is regional experience parameter, and Tertiary Stratigraphy is taken 3.7, and old stratum is taken 2;
Step 2, the porosity of calculating roof: after porosity test data are playbacked, after extracting playback
Density log data, and in view of the shale content impact on porosity, with density and shale content as independent variable, porosity is
Dependent variable, carries out binary regression matching, just can get equation (5) shown pores porosity computation model,
φ=-1.392 ρb-0.028·Vsh+6.672 (5)
In formula: φ is the porosity of roof, %;ρbFor the density of roof, g/cm3;
Step 3, calculating roof fracture development index: the fracture development index shown in structure equation (8):
In formula: RfThe fracture intensity index (FII) calculated for Young's modulus, dimensionless;EmaFor the dynamic modulus of elasticity of rock matrix,
MPa, is tried to achieve by theoretical value;E is the Young's modulus in coal seam, MPa;Δtc、ΔtsWhen being respectively compressional wave and the shear wave of roof
Difference, μ s/m;ΔtmFor the compressional wave time difference of roof skeleton, μ s/m;FcFor fracture development intensity index, dimensionless;KνFor rock
Integrity factor, dimensionless;
Step 4, calculating roof moisture content: build the moisture content computation model shown in equation (10),
In formula: CwFor roof moisture content, dimensionless;ρwThe density aqueous for roof, g/cm3;ρmFor coal seam
The density of balkstone skeleton, g/cm3;Other parameter physical significances are ibid;
Step 5, calculating roof comprcssive strength: comprcssive strength is in close relations with Young's modulus and shale content, according to
This, establish the computation model of comprcssive strength in equation (11) clastic rock section,
Co=0.0045 E (1-Vsh)+0.008·E·Vsh (11)
In formula: CoFor compressive strength of rock, MPa;
Step 6, structure coal seam top rock stability Quantitative Evaluation with Well Logging model: based on the scheme in step one~step 5
Understanding, the stability of rock is directly proportional to lithology factor, comprcssive strength, becomes anti-with porosity, fracture development index and moisture content
Ratio, then the quantitative Analysis formula of definite equation (12) Appraisal of Stability of Coal Seam Roof index, it is steady that support equation (12) calculates
Qualitative coefficient, and have 8 well logging sampled data points in view of 1m, the method using weighting to process constructs shown in equation (13)
Appraisal of Stability of Coal Seam Roof Index for Calculation model:
In formula: RsFor coal seam top rock stability coefficient, dimensionless;IsFor Appraisal of Stability of Coal Seam Roof index, dimensionless;H
For roof thickness, m, this value can be taken as 10m;The log data that i is to be calculated is counted, dimensionless;
Step 7, Appraisal of Stability of Coal Seam Roof Index for Calculation: each evaluation that will calculate in above-mentioned steps one~step 5
Index substitutes in the equation (12) in step 6, equation (13), just can realize the calculating of roof index of stability, roof
Estimation of stability index IsChange in value is bigger, in order to according to IsValue divides the type of top board closed performance, to RsValue is also carried out
Normalized, through normalized good, IsMaximum be 1, minima is 0, and its value is the biggest, the stability of roof
The strongest, according to its result of calculation, in system contrasts actual process of coal mining on the basis of roof stability monitoring materials,
Give the Appraisal of Stability of Coal Seam Roof grading standard shown in table 1:
Table 1 Appraisal of Stability of Coal Seam Roof grade classification table
Roof stability type | Estimation of stability index Is |
I class | >0.7 |
II class | 0.4<Is<0.7 |
III class | <0.4 |
As shown in Table 1, the stability of roof is divided into three classes by the present invention, and I class represents good stability;II class represents
Stability is medium;III class represents poor stability.
The present invention is first for coal seam top rock stability, it is proposed that a kind of coal seam top rock stability Quantitative Evaluation with Well Logging side
Method, it is possible to effectively utilize well-log information and carry out roof index of stability calculating, to providing boring for safety of coal mines exploitation
Logging technique is supported, had both taken into full account the impact on stability of coal roof lithologic feature, comprcssive strength and moisture content, and had held concurrently again
Having turned round and look at the impact of roof porosity, characteristics of fracture development, the coal seam top rock stability evaluated is with colliery practical situation relatively
It is identical.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is the coal seam top rock stability Quantitative Evaluation with Well Logging method flow diagram in the present invention.
Fig. 2 is the roof natural gamma in the present invention and particle diameter graph of a relation.
Fig. 3 is the roof density in the present invention and porosity graph of a relation.
Fig. 4 is the roof shale content in the present invention and porosity graph of a relation.
Fig. 5 is the coal seam top rock stability Quantitative Evaluation with Well Logging result map in the present invention.
Detailed description of the invention
Below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings technical scheme is done narration in detail.
With reference to Fig. 1, a kind of Quantitative Evaluation with Well Logging method of coal seam top rock stability, comprise the following steps:
Step one, calculating coal roof lithologic coefficient: in clastic rock section, the granule of rock is the thickest, and comprcssive strength is the strongest,
Then stability is the best.The rock that granule is the thinnest, the radioactive substance entrained by rock particles surface is the most, gamma ray log
It is worth the biggest.Then, gamma ray log can characterize the size of rock effectively.With reference to Fig. 2, fully take into account samely
Layer, multiple wells natural gamma amplitude of variation relatively big, use equation (1) to ask for relative natural gamma, so utilize relatively from
The rock particle diameter that so gamma and laboratory record carries out correlation analysis, asks for the particle diameter of roof rock, and then utilizes
Rock particle diameter and shale content build coal roof lithologic coefficient calculations model, specific as follows:
Md=-0.124 Δ GR+0.248 (2)
In formula: Δ GR is relative natural gamma, dimensionless;GR、GRmax、GRminIt is respectively computation layer point, pure shale, sharp sand
The natural gamma value of rock, API;MdFor rock particles diameter, mm;IlFor coal roof lithologic coefficient, dimensionless;VshContain for shale
Amount, decimal;GCUR is regional experience parameter, and Tertiary Stratigraphy is taken 3.7, and old stratum is taken 2.
When coal roof lithologic coefficient increases, showing that contained chiltern proportion increases, top board more tends towards stability.Otherwise, work as coal
When layer Roof rock feature coefficient reduces, showing that contained shale proportion increases, top board is the most unstable.
Step 2, the porosity of calculating roof: with reference to Fig. 3, Fig. 4, density log can reflect stratum effectively
Porosity, and density log be coalfield produce in must survey project.Accordingly, after porosity test data are playbacked, carry
Take the density log data after playback, and in view of the shale content impact on porosity, become for oneself with density and shale content
Amount, porosity is dependent variable, carries out binary regression matching, just can get equation (5) shown pores porosity computation model,
φ=-1.392 ρb-0.028·Vsh+6.672 (5)
In formula: φ is the porosity of roof, %;ρbFor the density of roof, g/cm3。
Step 3, calculating roof fracture development index: Young's modulus can reflect the development degree of micro cracks in oil of its rock.
Owing to the elastic modelling quantity of rock and the development degree of micro cracks in oil of rock are relevant, crack is more grown, and Young's modulus is the least, and rock matrix
Elastic modelling quantity be a constant for same rock, the most just can be carried out table by the fracture intensity index (FII) shown in equation (6)
Levy whether top board grows crack.Sound wave runs into generation diffraction when rupturing in rock, when impact is walked;The zone of fracture is more grown, i.e. rock
Stone complete the poorest, velocity of longitudinal wave is the least.Therefore, utilize rock integrity factor to characterize whether roof grows broken
Band.Obviously, it is the biggest that intensity index is sent out in crack, and crack is more grown;Integrity factor is the biggest, and rock more grows crushed zone.Accordingly, may be used
Build the fracture development index shown in equation (8).
In formula: RfThe fracture intensity index (FII) calculated for Young's modulus, dimensionless;EmaFor the dynamic modulus of elasticity of rock matrix,
MPa, is tried to achieve by theoretical value;E is the Young's modulus in coal seam, MPa;Δtc、ΔtsWhen being respectively compressional wave and the shear wave of roof
Difference, μ s/m;ΔtmFor the compressional wave time difference of roof skeleton, μ s/m;FcFor fracture development intensity index, dimensionless;KνFor rock
Integrity factor, dimensionless;Other parameter physical significances are the same.
Step 4, calculating roof moisture content: when roof exists a large amount of moveable water, may directly influence
The exploitation in colliery.Being defined from moisture content, moisture content is the mass ratio of the aqueous quality of rock and whole rock.Based on
This thought, just can build the moisture content computation model shown in equation (10) based on rock physics volume-based model.
In formula: CwFor roof moisture content, dimensionless;ρwThe density aqueous for roof, g/cm3;ρmFor coal seam
The density of balkstone skeleton, g/cm3;Other parameter physical significances are ibid.
Step 5, calculating roof comprcssive strength: the comprcssive strength of rock is that rock sample is issued at uniaxial tension
The ultimate value destroyed, it is numerically equal to maximum crushing stress when destroying.The rock of different minerals composition, has different resisting
Compressive Strength.Then, comprcssive strength reflects the stability of roof largely.Learnt by forefathers' research, pressure resistance
Spend in close relations with Young's modulus and shale content, accordingly, establish the calculating of comprcssive strength in equation (11) clastic rock section
Model.
Co=0.0045 E (1-Vsh)+0.008·E·Vsh (11)
In formula: CoFor compressive strength of rock, MPa;Other parameter physical significances are ibid.
Step 6, structure coal seam top rock stability Quantitative Evaluation with Well Logging model: for stablizing of quantitatively characterizing roof
Property, introduce Appraisal of Stability of Coal Seam Roof index, as the parameter of quantitative assessment coal seam top rock stability energy, i.e. with this exponent pair
The stability of roof carries out quantitative assessment.Understand based on the scheme in step one~step 5, the stability of rock and rock
Property coefficient, comprcssive strength are directly proportional, and are inversely proportional to porosity, fracture development index and moisture content.Then definite equation (11) coal
The quantitative Analysis formula of layer Evaluation on Roof Stability index.According to production practices, when evaluating coal seam top rock stability, it is contemplated that away from
Rock stratum in the range of the 10m of top, coal seam, the top board that top, distance coal seam is the nearest, the biggest to stability influence, i.e. weight coefficient is the biggest.Based on
This thought, the coefficient of stability calculated based on equation (12), and have 8 well logging sampled data points in view of 1m, use at weighting
The method of reason constructs the Appraisal of Stability of Coal Seam Roof Index for Calculation model shown in equation (13).
In formula: RsFor coal seam top rock stability coefficient, dimensionless;IsFor Appraisal of Stability of Coal Seam Roof index, dimensionless;H
For roof thickness, m, this value can be taken as 10m;The log data that i is to be calculated is counted, dimensionless;Other parameter physics is anticipated
Justice is the same.
Step 7, Appraisal of Stability of Coal Seam Roof Index for Calculation: each evaluation that will calculate in above-mentioned steps one~step 5
Index substitutes in the equation (12) in step 6, equation (13), just can realize the calculating of roof index of stability.Roof
Estimation of stability index IsChange in value is bigger, in order to according to IsValue divides the type of top board closed performance, to RsValue is also carried out
Normalized.Good through normalized, IsMaximum be 1, minima is 0, and its value is the biggest, the stability of roof
The strongest.According to its result of calculation, in system contrasts actual process of coal mining on the basis of roof stability monitoring materials,
Give the Appraisal of Stability of Coal Seam Roof grading standard shown in table 1.
Table 1 Appraisal of Stability of Coal Seam Roof grade classification table
Roof stability type | Coefficient of stability Is |
I class | >0.7 |
II class | 0.4<Is<0.7 |
III class | <0.4 |
As shown in Table 1, the stability of roof is divided into three classes by the present invention, and I class represents good stability;II class represents
Stability is medium;III class represents poor stability.
The present invention is tried out in actual coalfield.In the coal seam top rock stability Quantitative Evaluation with Well Logging of X well is applied, reference
Fig. 5,550.1~552.5 meters of well sections are coal seam, and this direct rimrock of well section is argillaceous sandstone, and thickness is 4m, and old rimrock is mud
Rock, thickness is 6m, and the coefficient of stability distribution utilizing the inventive method to calculate is 0.21~0.56, the coal seam that weighting processes
Evaluation on Roof Stability index 0.48, illustrates that the stability of top board is medium;Mining area belonging to this well, carried out coal mining in recent years,
There is not the security incidents such as roof collapses, showed that the result of the method for the invention evaluation was fully able to meet colliery peace
The requirement of conceptual design adopted by standard-sized sheet.
The method had both taken into full account the impact on stability of coal roof lithologic feature, comprcssive strength and moisture content, again
Take into account the impact of roof porosity, characteristics of fracture development, the coal seam top rock stability evaluated and colliery practical situation
The most identical.Each evaluation index in this method can be asked for from coalfield borehole logging data, and almost all of coalfield
It is respectively provided with substantial amounts of borehole logging data.Therefore, coal seam top rock stability Quantitative Evaluation with Well Logging method of the present invention has good
Good popularizing application prospect and value.
It will be understood by those of skill in the art that owing to well-log information is easily waited borehole environment to be affected, in order to more by expanding
Evaluating the stability of roof accurately, its well-log information is carried out the correction method of surroundings effecting is the most necessary, and well logging meter
The compressive strength of rock calculated has to pass through dynamic static conversion scale.
Claims (1)
1. a coal seam top rock stability logging evaluation evaluation methodology, it is characterised in that comprise the following steps:
Step one, calculating coal roof lithologic coefficient: use equation (1) to ask for relative natural gamma, and then utilize the most natural
The rock particle diameter that gamma and laboratory record carries out correlation analysis, asks for the particle diameter of roof rock, and then utilizes rock
Particle diameter and shale content build coal roof lithologic coefficient calculations model, specific as follows:
Md=-0.124 Δ GR+0.248 (2)
In formula: Δ GR is relative natural gamma, dimensionless;GR、GRmax、GRminIt is respectively computation layer point, pure shale, clean sandstone
Natural gamma value, API;MdFor rock particle diameter, mm;IlFor coal roof lithologic coefficient, dimensionless;VshFor shale content, decimal;
GCUR is regional experience parameter, and Tertiary Stratigraphy is taken 3.7, and old stratum is taken 2;
Step 2, the porosity of calculating roof: after porosity test data are playbacked, extract the density after playback
Log data, and in view of the shale content impact on porosity, with density and shale content as independent variable, porosity be because of change
Amount, carries out binary regression matching, just can get equation (5) shown pores porosity computation model,
φ=-1.392 ρb-0.028·Vsh+6.672 (5)
In formula: φ is the porosity of roof, %;ρbFor the density of roof, g/cm3;
Step 3, calculating roof fracture development index: the fracture development index shown in structure equation (8):
In formula: RfThe fracture intensity index (FII) calculated for Young's modulus, dimensionless;EmaFor the dynamic modulus of elasticity of rock matrix, MPa,
Tried to achieve by theoretical value;E is the Young's modulus in coal seam, MPa;Δtc、ΔtsIt is respectively compressional wave and shear wave slowness, the μ s/ of roof
m;ΔtmFor the compressional wave time difference of roof skeleton, μ s/m;FcFor fracture development intensity index, dimensionless;KνFor rock integrity
Coefficient, dimensionless;
Step 4, calculating roof moisture content: build the moisture content computation model shown in equation (10),
In formula: CwFor roof moisture content, dimensionless;ρwThe density aqueous for roof, g/cm3;ρmFor roof
The density of rock matrix, g/cm3;
Step 5, calculating roof comprcssive strength: comprcssive strength is in close relations with Young's modulus and shale content, accordingly, builds
Found the computation model of comprcssive strength in equation (11) clastic rock section,
Co=0.0045 E (1-Vsh)+0.008·E·Vsh (11)
In formula: CoFor compressive strength of rock, MPa;
Step 6, structure coal seam top rock stability Quantitative Evaluation with Well Logging model: understand based on the scheme in step one~step 5,
The stability of rock is directly proportional to lithology factor, comprcssive strength, is inversely proportional to porosity, fracture development index and moisture content, in
It is the quantitative Analysis formula of definite equation (12) Appraisal of Stability of Coal Seam Roof index, relies on the stability system that equation (12) calculates
Number, and have 8 well logging sampled data points in view of 1m, the method using weighting to process constructs the top, coal seam shown in equation (13)
Plate estimation of stability Index for Calculation model:
In formula: RsFor coal seam top rock stability coefficient, dimensionless;IsFor Appraisal of Stability of Coal Seam Roof index, dimensionless;H is coal
Layer top plate thickness, m, this value can be taken as 10m;The log data that i is to be calculated is counted, dimensionless;
Step 7, Appraisal of Stability of Coal Seam Roof Index for Calculation: each evaluation index that will calculate in above-mentioned steps one~step 5
Substituting in the equation (12) in step 6, equation (13), just can realize the calculating of roof index of stability, roof is stable
Property evaluation number IsChange in value is bigger, in order to according to IsValue divides the type of top board closed performance, to RsValue is also returned
One change processes, good through normalized, IsMaximum be 1, minima is 0, and its value is the biggest, and the stability of roof is more
By force, according to its result of calculation, in system contrasts actual process of coal mining on the basis of roof stability monitoring materials, be given
Appraisal of Stability of Coal Seam Roof grading standard shown in table 1:
Table 1 Appraisal of Stability of Coal Seam Roof grade classification table
As shown in Table 1, the stability of roof is divided into three classes by the present invention, and I class represents good stability;II class represents stable
Property is medium;III class represents poor stability.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610681994.7A CN106295042B (en) | 2016-08-17 | 2016-08-17 | A kind of coal seam top rock stability Quantitative Evaluation with Well Logging method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610681994.7A CN106295042B (en) | 2016-08-17 | 2016-08-17 | A kind of coal seam top rock stability Quantitative Evaluation with Well Logging method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN106295042A true CN106295042A (en) | 2017-01-04 |
CN106295042B CN106295042B (en) | 2018-04-06 |
Family
ID=57678739
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610681994.7A Expired - Fee Related CN106295042B (en) | 2016-08-17 | 2016-08-17 | A kind of coal seam top rock stability Quantitative Evaluation with Well Logging method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN106295042B (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107066749A (en) * | 2017-04-25 | 2017-08-18 | 西安石油大学 | A kind of method that quantitative assessment Seam Roof And Floor covers performance |
CN107842394A (en) * | 2017-10-23 | 2018-03-27 | 青岛理工大学 | Large Span Underground chamber exploits the Dynamic Elastic Module detection method of roof stability |
CN108804849A (en) * | 2018-06-22 | 2018-11-13 | 西南石油大学 | A kind of rock mechanics parameters evaluation method based on structure complexity |
CN108825216A (en) * | 2018-04-03 | 2018-11-16 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | A kind of method in quantitative assessment carbonate gas reservoirs potentiality to be exploited area |
CN114418365A (en) * | 2022-01-05 | 2022-04-29 | 华北电力科学研究院有限责任公司 | Method, system and device for evaluating applicability of fly ash and storage medium |
CN116757557A (en) * | 2023-08-15 | 2023-09-15 | 山东新巨龙能源有限责任公司 | Raw gangue filling mining quality assessment method based on data analysis |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102865078A (en) * | 2012-04-28 | 2013-01-09 | 中国神华能源股份有限公司 | Method of determining water-preserved mining geological conditions under loose water bearing layer |
-
2016
- 2016-08-17 CN CN201610681994.7A patent/CN106295042B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102865078A (en) * | 2012-04-28 | 2013-01-09 | 中国神华能源股份有限公司 | Method of determining water-preserved mining geological conditions under loose water bearing layer |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
王剑,王珺,候淞译: "利用测井资料评价煤层顶底板的裂缝发育程度", 《西安石油大学学报(自然科学版)》 * |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107066749A (en) * | 2017-04-25 | 2017-08-18 | 西安石油大学 | A kind of method that quantitative assessment Seam Roof And Floor covers performance |
CN107842394A (en) * | 2017-10-23 | 2018-03-27 | 青岛理工大学 | Large Span Underground chamber exploits the Dynamic Elastic Module detection method of roof stability |
CN107842394B (en) * | 2017-10-23 | 2019-03-26 | 青岛理工大学 | The Dynamic Elastic Module detection method of Large Span Underground chamber exploitation roof stability |
CN108825216A (en) * | 2018-04-03 | 2018-11-16 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | A kind of method in quantitative assessment carbonate gas reservoirs potentiality to be exploited area |
CN108804849A (en) * | 2018-06-22 | 2018-11-13 | 西南石油大学 | A kind of rock mechanics parameters evaluation method based on structure complexity |
CN108804849B (en) * | 2018-06-22 | 2022-04-26 | 西南石油大学 | Rock mechanical parameter evaluation method based on structural complexity |
CN114418365A (en) * | 2022-01-05 | 2022-04-29 | 华北电力科学研究院有限责任公司 | Method, system and device for evaluating applicability of fly ash and storage medium |
CN114418365B (en) * | 2022-01-05 | 2024-05-03 | 华北电力科学研究院有限责任公司 | Fly ash applicability evaluation method, system, device and storage medium |
CN116757557A (en) * | 2023-08-15 | 2023-09-15 | 山东新巨龙能源有限责任公司 | Raw gangue filling mining quality assessment method based on data analysis |
CN116757557B (en) * | 2023-08-15 | 2023-11-07 | 山东新巨龙能源有限责任公司 | Raw gangue filling mining quality assessment method based on data analysis |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN106295042B (en) | 2018-04-06 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN106295042A (en) | A kind of coal seam top rock stability Quantitative Evaluation with Well Logging method | |
CN105221141B (en) | A kind of mud shale brittleness index Forecasting Methodology | |
Khaksar et al. | Rock strength from core and logs, where we stand and ways to go | |
Zimmer et al. | Pressure and porosity influences on VP− VS ratio in unconsolidated sands | |
Asadi | Application of artificial neural networks in prediction of uniaxial compressive strength of rocks using well logs and drilling data | |
CN104428691A (en) | Fracture monitoring and characterisation | |
CN106054279B (en) | A kind of determination method of coal petrography brittleness index | |
Yale et al. | Conversion of dynamic mechanical property calculations to static values for geomechanical modeling | |
CN105527652A (en) | Logging method and device for brittleness of rocks | |
Vafaie et al. | An investigation on the effect of thermal maturity and rock composition on the mechanical behavior of carbonaceous shale formations | |
Vinck et al. | Advanced in situ and laboratory characterisation of the ALPACA chalk research site | |
CN105370270B (en) | The method that shale gas reservoir gas-bearing saturation degree is determined by the dipole sonic P-wave And S time difference | |
McClave | Correlation of Rebound-Hammer Rock Strength With Core and Sonic-Log-Derived Mechanical Rock Properties in Cretaceous Niobrara and Frontier Formation Cores, Piceance Basin, ColoradoU? Y? | |
Su et al. | A comprehensive methodology of evaluation of the fracability of a shale gas play | |
He et al. | Static and dynamic elastic moduli of Bakken Formation | |
Northrop et al. | Multi-Well Experiment: a field laboratory for tight gas sands | |
Li et al. | Shale mechanical properties influence factors overview and experimental investigation on water content effects | |
Buntoro et al. | Validation of shale brittleness index calculation from wireline log of well BETRO-001 by using XRD test results and uniaxial test as parameters for determining potential of shale hydrocarbon-brown shale of Pematang Group Formation, Central Sumatra Basin, Bengkalis Trough | |
CN110954942A (en) | Method and system for making chart with clay content identification function | |
Rasouli | Geomechanics of gas shales | |
Altowairqi et al. | Measuring ultrasonic characterisation to determine the impact of TOC and the stress field on shale gas anisotropy | |
Clemons et al. | Leveraging Seismic Attributes to Understand the'Frac-Able'Limits and Reservoir Performance in the Eagle Ford Shale, South Texas, USA | |
Abdullah et al. | Characterizing P-wave velocity and elastic properties of sedimentary rocks for foundation of building | |
Mandal et al. | Viscoelastic approach to capture varying least principal stress magnitude and the effect of observed stress layering on hydraulic fracturing-An example from shale formations of the Perth Basin | |
Masri | Amplitude Versus Offset analysis–A possible useful tool for geothermal exploration |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20180406 Termination date: 20180817 |
|
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |