CN106126892A - A kind of plastic limit analysis upper bound method of stone masonry retaining wall ultimate bearing capacity - Google Patents
A kind of plastic limit analysis upper bound method of stone masonry retaining wall ultimate bearing capacity Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106126892A CN106126892A CN201610440635.2A CN201610440635A CN106126892A CN 106126892 A CN106126892 A CN 106126892A CN 201610440635 A CN201610440635 A CN 201610440635A CN 106126892 A CN106126892 A CN 106126892A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- retaining wall
- stone
- stone masonry
- rightarrow
- gamma
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 239000004575 stone Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 119
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 44
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 11
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 239000004570 mortar (masonry) Substances 0.000 claims description 50
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000010008 shearing Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 abstract description 6
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 206010061619 Deformity Diseases 0.000 abstract 1
- 230000001815 facial effect Effects 0.000 abstract 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000011083 cement mortar Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 2
- 241000208340 Araliaceae Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000005035 Panax pseudoginseng ssp. pseudoginseng Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000003140 Panax quinquefolius Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011449 brick Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004568 cement Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000205 computational method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002939 conjugate gradient method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004069 differentiation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011439 discrete element method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005206 flow analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000008434 ginseng Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011440 grout Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013178 mathematical model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007613 slurry method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005303 weighing Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02D—FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
- E02D29/00—Independent underground or underwater structures; Retaining walls
- E02D29/02—Retaining or protecting walls
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16Z—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G16Z99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other main groups of this subclass
Abstract
The plastic limit analysis upper bound method of a kind of stone masonry retaining wall ultimate bearing capacity, the present invention relates to a kind of plastic Limit Analysis Method solving stone masonry gear soil ultimate bearing capacity, belongs to side slope protection field of engineering technology.The present invention is with stone masonry retaining wall as object of study, theoretical based on plastic limit analysis upper bound method, use the mechanical characteristic of Stiff Block volume elements simulation stone-laying stone, with the rate of displacement of the Block Element centre of form as unknown quantity, and introduce Rankine's earth pressure theory and set up external force overload condition, structure meets rigid block movement unit and screed facial disfigurement compatibility conditions, Plastic Flow constraints, the equal condition of interior external power and the motor-driven license velocity field of velocity boundary conditions, set up the nonlinear mathematics programming model solving stone masonry gear soil ultimate bearing capacity, and use optimized algorithm to solve the minima of ultimate load.The inventive method has definite conception, computational accuracy high, can be applied to the Analysis of Bearing Capacity of stone masonry retaining wall.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to the plastic limit analysis upper bound method of a kind of stone masonry gear soil ultimate bearing capacity, belong to side slope protection work
Journey technical field.
Background technology
The protection of slope project is one of important content that foundation engineering is built, and stone masonry retaining wall is in slope project one
Plant conventional bank protection structures.Stone masonry retaining wall has lot of advantages, such as: advantage of lower cost, strong adaptability, bank protection energy
Power is higher, easy construction etc., because these advantage stone masonry retaining walls are favored by a large amount of side slope protection engineering projects.Therefore
Being necessary that the mechanics effect of the bearing capacity to stone masonry retaining wall and destruction is studied, this has important practical value
And theory significance.
Work stone or the rubble masonry of cement mortar of stone masonry retaining wall general selected shape rule form.Requirement in construction
Sleeping blocks of stone layering, the upper and lower fissure of displacement, inside and outside take block, and strictly accomplish " flat, steady, tight, completely " four words.Flat is exactly that each layer is wanted
Ask level to rise, contour carry out, do not allow bricklaying surface to cause the discrepancy in elevation excessive because of progress difference, be exactly surely that stone to be built surely, no
Easily shake;Being exactly tightly that stone leans on tight with stone, do not have big gap, the mortar filling in space is closely;It it is exactly completely mortar
Crack of stone to be filled, prevents dry joint and empty seam.The stone masonry retaining wall built in strict accordance with construction technology code has higher
Strength and stiffness, bearing capacity is preferable.For economic, safe purpose, need gear in the stone masonry DESIGN OF RETAINING WALLS stage
Wall carries out the design of science, mainly determines its bearing capacity, physical dimension, material parameter etc..Over nearly 40 years, along with computer
The development of technology and the further investigation of ground theory, the analysis of stone masonry retaining wall has defined many practical methods, than
As: balance method of rigid-body limit, FInite Element, discrete element method etc..Numerous engineers and scholar are from the soil pressure of stone masonry retaining wall
The aspects such as power theory, calculation of stability against sliding, deformation calculating and ultimate bearing capacity have carried out system in-depth study, and obtain
Plentiful and substantial achievement in research.
Although stone masonry retaining wall is widely used in side slope protection engineering, but stone masonry retaining wall has the power of complexity
Learning characteristic, be mainly manifested in: stone masonry retaining wall is typical Discontinuous transmission, the destruction of body of wall typically occurs in mortar aspect
On, stone does not destroys.Therefore, current wide variety of analysis method can't describe stone masonry gear soil accurately
Wall bearing capacity problem.This respect still has many weak points, is mainly manifested in:
(1) based on limit equilibrium method in the main flow analysis method of present stage stone masonry retaining wall bearing capacity, the limit is put down
Although weighing apparatus method has been highly convenient for application under the effort of many scholars, but it is only applicable to known retaining wall post-failure behaviors and (breaks
Broken face) situation, i.e. the plane of fracture be calculate before artificial suppose in advance, this has certain difference with practical situation, so pole
Limit counterbalanced procedure has certain limitation.
(2) stone masonry retaining wall is mainly formed by different block stone and masonry of cement mortar, and wherein block stone is due to by force
Spending and higher typically will not destroy, the destruction of retaining wall typically occurs in cement mortar aspect, therefore stone masonry retaining wall tool
Having the Discontinuous transmission characteristic of height, under limit state, its post-failure behaviors is difficult to determine, it is therefore desirable to one can simulate non-company
The method of continuous mechanics characteristic solves its ultimate load.
In consideration of it, present invention research work based on project of national nature science fund project (51564026) proposes a kind of new
The method for solving of ultimate bearing capacity of stone masonry retaining wall.
Summary of the invention
It is an object of the invention to provide the computational methods of a kind of stone masonry retaining wall ultimate bearing capacity, it is thus achieved that stone masonry gear soil
Limit state when wall destroys, design, calculating for slope earth-retaining wall provide a kind of new method.
The technical scheme of the stone masonry retaining wall ultimate bearing capacity upper bound method of the present invention sequentially includes the following steps: successively and sees
Fig. 1 Technology Roadmap
One, draft the calculating parameter of stone masonry retaining wall, according to the practical situation of stone masonry retaining wall, draft it and calculate ginseng
Number, specifically includes that the protection geological conditions parameter of side slope, retaining wall build geometric parameter, retaining wall and the material parameter of the soil body
The information such as (unit weight, cohesiveness, angle of friction), parameters of loading.
Two, use rigid block movement mesh discretization stone masonry retaining wall, i.e. use rigid block movement mesh discretization method to grout
Stone retaining wall is discrete becomes rigid block movement unit+without the mechanical model (as shown in Figure 2) of thickness mortar aspect, with rigid block movement list
The speed of unit's centre of form is the motor-driven license velocity field that unknown quantity builds retaining wall.Stone masonry retaining wall is by stone and mortar aspect group
Become, in order to simplify the Upper Bound Solution calculating and seeking accurately its ultimate load, present invention assumes that stone-laying stone is rigidity
Block, it will not occur any deformation and failure, and use its mechanical characteristic of rigid block movement unit simulation;Assume screed simultaneously
Face is without thickness contact surface, and the destruction of retaining wall only occurs at the mortar aspect between stone, and in deformation process, stone
Will not be mutually disengaged out between block.
The variable defined in Rigid Body Element, mortar aspect (contact surface) is as shown in Figure 3.Wherein global coordinate is (X, Y),
Local coordinate system in mortar aspect k of adjacent block unit i and Rigid Body Element j is defined as (Sk,nk), the block i centre of form acts on
Velocity vectors beSpeed present on structural plane k is interrupted, and its vector isEach change
Amount explanation is as shown in Table 1 below.
Table 1 mortar aspect and the variable of rigid block movement unit
Three, foundation solves the upper bound method nonlinear mathematics programming model of stone masonry retaining wall ultimate bearing capacity
1, object function
The present invention is by unlimited evenly load q on stone masonry retaining wall rolling earth behind retaining wall surface0As object function, it is assumed that after wall
Banketing and extend to unlimited distance, surface of banketing is level, wall back of the body vertical smooth.Solve its ultimate load to be just to solve for retaining wall and exist
There is the load of unstable failure critical moment, according to upper bound theorem, need to solve q0MinimaObjectives function is fixed
Justice is as follows:
Minimize:q0 (1)
Wherein: q0Unlimited evenly load (as shown in Figure 4) for retaining wall rolling earth behind retaining wall surface.
2, the Rigid Body Element upper bound method constraint equation of stone-laying stone
(1) rigid block movement element deformation compatibility conditions
After the stone masonry discrete geometrical system for rigid block movement unit+without thickness mortar aspect of gear soil, adjacent block
Deformation between unit i, j and both mortar aspects k must is fulfilled for deformation compatibility condition.Deformation compatibility condition is as follows:
In above formula:For the relative speed between adjacent block.Wherein:For global coordinate and local coordinate system
Transition matrix:
Then can get:
In above formula: αkIt it is the inclination angle (counterclockwise for just) of mortar aspect between two Rigid Body Elements.
Formula (4) availability vector, matrix are abbreviated as:
In above formula:
(2) the Plastic Flow constraints of mortar aspect
Present invention assumes that stone block will not destroy, therefore Plastic Flow occurs over just contact surface (the i.e. stone between stone
Mortar aspect between block) on, i.e. suppose that speed is discontinuously positioned on the contact edge of two adjacent rigid Rigid Body Elements (such as Fig. 3
Shown in), and assume that screed face thickness is zero, in order to meet the condition of motor-driven license, on contact edge discontinuous normal direction and
Tangential velocity interruption value has to comply with flowing criterion.Mohr-Coulomb yield function f (σ, τ) is determined by the discontinuous limit of speed
Local coordinate system (n, s) in can be written as:
In above formula: σn,τsIt is respectively the normal stress in mortar aspect and tangential stress,For the angle of friction of mortar aspect,
C is the cohesiveness of mortar aspect, f1(σn,τs)、f2(σn,τs) it is the Mohr-Coulomb yield function of mortar aspect.Can by deriving
Obtain the velocity discontinuity value determined by yield function:
In above formula: Δ vn,ΔusFor the velocity discontinuity value of stone masonry aspect,For plasticity multiplier.
Formula (8) availability vector, matrix are abbreviated as:
In above formula:For plasticity multiplier.
According to the associated flow rule of the theory of plasticity, for ideal epistemology model, deformation compatibility condition obtain broad sense
The components of strain should be equal to being obtained generalized plasticity strain rate component by associated flow rule and yield condition.By formula (5) and formula
(9) combine and just obtain the Plastic Flow constraints of all mortar aspects:
Require that plasticity multiplier is non-negative simultaneously:
(3) internal strength power condition equal with external work power
Being learnt by the principle of virtual work, virtual power and the dissipated power of object internal energy that external force is done are equal, then have:
In above formula:It is continuum internal stress vector,It is the virtual strain within continuum,It it is border upper stress
Vector,Being borderline virtual strain, W is block deadweight, and Q is face power load, V*For virtual velocity;The equation left side is respectively and produces
In stone masonry barricade and along the internal dissipation power destroyed along sliding surface, on the right of equation, it is respectively block deadweight W, borderline
The equivalent load of face power load Q is in virtual velocity V*On power.
According to stone-laying stone of the present invention be rigidity it is assumed that the Rigid Body Element of stone will not deform and destroy, internal strength
Dissipation only result from the interface (i.e. mortar aspect) between Rigid Body Element, the therefore internal strength power within continuumConvolution (6), (7), in formula (12), Section 1 can be written as:
In above formula: σn,τsIt is respectively the normal stress in mortar aspect and tangential stress,It is respectively in mortar aspect
Normal direction normal strain rate and tangential shear strain rate,It is border upper stress vector,Being borderline virtual strain, l is mortar
The length of aspect, c is the cohesiveness of mortar aspect,For plasticity multiplier.
The most only consider that the interior energy that borderline stress and the deadweight of stone block are caused dissipates.For stone masonry retaining wall
Borderline load, patent of the present invention mainly considers the unlimited evenly load on the deadweight of the soil body after retaining wall and rolling earth behind retaining wall
q0Effect to the wall back of the body, its action principle is as shown in Figure 4.According to Theory of Rankine Active Earth Pressure, banket case depth Z in distance
The active earth pressure strength p of the retaining walls back of the body of place's any pointakExpression formula be:
In above formula,It is coefficient of active earth pressure, σak=γ Z+q0It is vertically should at degree of depth Z
Power,C' is the shearing strength of rolling earth behind retaining wall.
The face power load Q then banketed on surface-boundary can be written as:
In above formula, Γ is that retaining walls carries on the back integral boundary.
Consider further that the deadweight W of stone block, then (12) formula becomes:
(4) velocity boundary conditions
From upper bound theorem, motor-driven license velocity field must is fulfilled for known velocity boundary conditions in speed edges.
Speed in stone masonry retaining wall is that the velocity boundary conditions on the border b of zero is:
In above formulaFor the coordinate conversion matrix of interface j on the b of border:
4, the upper bound method nonlinear mathematics programming model of stone masonry retaining wall ultimate bearing capacity is solved
During finding limit load, by unlimited evenly load q on retaining wall rolling earth behind retaining wall surface0It is set to object function, then solves
The upper bound method nonlinear mathematics programming model of stone masonry retaining wall ultimate bearing capacity is:
Four, the ultimate bearing capacity of stone masonry retaining wall is solved
Mathematical model derived above is a nonlinear mathematics programming model.It is non-that the present invention uses conjugate gradient method to carry out
Solving of linear math plan model, obtains result of calculation and includes the ultimate load of retaining wall and the velocity field of correspondence.
The ultimate principle of the present invention is: theoretical based on upper bound method, with stone masonry retaining wall as object of study, by upper bound method,
Rigid block movement mesh discretization method, Theory of Rankine Active Earth Pressure and Mathematical Planning means combine, with stone masonry gear soil
The unlimited evenly load on wall rolling earth behind retaining wall surface, as object function, uses rigid block movement mesh discretization method by stone masonry gear soil
Wall is discrete for block stone rigid block movement unit+without the mechanical model of thickness mortar aspect, builds and meets rigid block movement unit and mortar
The motor-driven license speed of layers defonnation compatibility conditions, Plastic Flow constraints, the equal condition of interior external power and velocity boundary conditions
Degree field, sets up the nonlinear mathematics programming model solving stone masonry gear soil ultimate bearing capacity, and uses optimized algorithm to solve the limit
The minima of load.
The method have the advantages that
1, the analysis of Ultimate that the present invention is stone masonry retaining wall provides a kind of new method, can accurately solve stone masonry
The Upper Bound Solution of the ultimate bearing capacity of retaining wall.
2, the present invention use rigid block movement unit+without thickness mortar aspect pattern come discrete stone masonry retaining wall, permissible
The mechanical characteristic of accurate simulation stone masonry retaining wall Discontinuous transmission, can accurately obtain its ultimate load and corresponding destruction machine
Structure.
3, the inventive method definite conception, computational accuracy height, can be applied to the bearing capacity of stone masonry retaining wall side slope
Analyze.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is the Technology Roadmap of the present invention;
Fig. 2 is stone masonry barricade rigid block movement unit and the discrete schematic diagram of mortar aspect;
Fig. 3 is the velocity mode of stone masonry rigid block movement unit;
Fig. 4 is that stone masonry retaining wall Rankine Active Earth Pressure calculates schematic diagram;
Fig. 5 is the geometry schematic diagram of embodiment retaining wall;
Fig. 6 is embodiment stone masonry retaining wall rigid block movement mesh discretization schematic diagram;
Fig. 7 is the speed vector figure that embodiment retaining wall ultimate load Upper Bound Solution is corresponding.
Detailed description of the invention
The invention will be further described with specific embodiment below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Embodiment: the present embodiment uses following steps to solve the ultimate load of a stone masonry retaining wall, and is obtaining
The failure mode of barricade analyzes with conventional method result of calculation later.
(1) the calculating parameter of retaining wall, is drafted
Being illustrated in figure 5 a stone masonry retaining wall, it is for grouting work stone retaining wall, and its design parameter is: stone masonry weight
Power formula retaining walls height 3.5m, slope, face gradient: 1:0.3, back slope gradient: 1:0.0, the wall slanted floor gradient: 0.0:
1, retaining wall is supporting course based on " argillaceous sandstone ", and retaining wall substrate enters supporting course >=1m;Stone-laying barricade uses cement bonded sand
Block stone material built by laying bricks or stones by slurry, and stone material is selected without differentiation, the square work stone of flawless regular shape, and the thickness of work stone is about
300mm, length and width is all not less than 200mm;Masonry allowable compressive stress is more than 2100kPa, and allowable shearing stress is more than 110kPa;
Stone masonry barricade is strictly by squeezing slurry method construction, it is ensured that mortar is full.Table 2 is the Material Physics mechanics parameter table of embodiment.
Table 2 embodiment grouts the physical and mechanical parameter table of stone and mortar aspect
(2), use the discrete embodiment of rigid block movement elements method stone masonry retaining wall, it may be assumed that use rigid block movement unit from
Dissipate stone, build the motor-driven license velocity field of retaining wall with the speed of the stone centre of form for unknown quantity.The retaining wall of embodiment altogether from
Dissipating is 53 rigid block movement unit and 127 mortar aspects, and its discrete schematic diagram is as shown in Figure 6.
(3), foundation solves the upper bound method nonlinear mathematics programming model of stone masonry retaining wall ultimate bearing capacity
Evenly load q of effect on surface of banketing is carried on the back in order to solve retaining walls0MinimaCan be according to formula (18)
The upper bound method nonlinear mathematics programming model of the ultimate bearing capacity of constitution and implementation example.
(4) ultimate bearing capacity of embodiment retaining wall, is solved.
Ultimate load according to the embodiment stone masonry retaining wall that formula (18) is set upUpper bound method nonlinear mathematics optimize
Model, uses the nonlinear mathematics programming solver of establishment, calculates the pole under the conditions of mortar aspect takes different parameters of shear resistant
Limit load carriesResult of calculation is listed in shown in table 3.This stone masonry retaining wall body of wall is understood at Ultimate Loads by result of calculation
Under failure mode as it is shown in fig. 7, Fig. 7 is mortar aspect parameters of shear resistant take c=100kPa,Time speed vector figure,
The failure mode being understood embodiment retaining wall body of wall by it is, along mortar aspect AB, failure by shear occurs.At this failure mode known
After, the analytic solutions of ultimate load can be calculated by the rigid Limit Equilibrium relation of retaining wallIt is shown in Table 3 equally
Shown in.
From result, the inventive method numerical solution is all higher than analytic solutions, shows as Upper Bound Solution character;And by side of the present invention
The ultimate load that method obtainsThe ultimate load obtained with analytic solutionsClosely, the inventive method is calculated
Numerical solution is less than 1% with the maximum error of analytic solutions, demonstrates correctness and the accuracy of the inventive method.
The ultimate load result of calculation of table 3 embodiment stone masonry retaining wall
Claims (1)
1. the plastic limit analysis upper bound method of a stone masonry retaining wall ultimate bearing capacity, it is characterised in that: with stone masonry gear soil
The unlimited evenly load on wall rolling earth behind retaining wall surface, as object function, uses rigid block movement mesh discretization method by stone masonry gear soil
Wall is discrete for block stone rigid block movement unit+without the mechanical model of thickness mortar aspect, builds and meets rigid block movement unit and mortar
The motor-driven license speed of layers defonnation compatibility conditions, Plastic Flow constraints, the equal condition of interior external power and velocity boundary conditions
Degree field, sets up the nonlinear mathematics programming model solving stone masonry gear soil ultimate bearing capacity, and uses optimized algorithm to solve the limit
The minima of load;Specifically comprise the following steps that
One, the calculating parameter of stone masonry retaining wall is drafted
According to the practical situation of stone masonry retaining wall, draft it and calculate parameter, including geological conditions parameter, geometric parameter, gear material
Material parameter, parameters of loading, material parameter includes unit weight, cohesiveness, angle of friction;
Two, rigid block movement mesh discretization stone masonry retaining wall is used
Rigid block movement mesh discretization method is used to become rigid block movement unit and mortar aspect by discrete for stone masonry retaining wall;Totally
Coordinate system is (X, Y), and the local coordinate system in mortar aspect k of adjacent block unit i and Rigid Body Element j is defined as (Sk,nk),
In the block i centre of form, the velocity vectors of effect isδuiRepresent rate of translation in X direction, δ viRepresent along Y side
To rate of translation structural plane k on speed interrupt vector beδSkRepresent along SkBetween the rate of translation of direction
Disconnected, δ nkRepresent along nkDirection rate of translation is interrupted;
Three, foundation solves the upper bound method nonlinear mathematics programming model of stone masonry retaining wall ultimate bearing capacity
(1) object function
Unlimited evenly load q with stone masonry retaining wall rolling earth behind retaining wall surface0As object function, it is assumed that rolling earth behind retaining wall extends to
Unlimited distance, surface of banketing is level, wall back of the body vertical smooth, solves q0Minima
(2) the Rigid Body Element upper bound method constraint equation of stone-laying stone
A rigid block movement element deformation compatibility conditions
Wherein:For the relative speed between adjacent block,For global coordinate and the transition matrix of local coordinate system;
Can be abbreviated as:
Wherein:αkIt is the inclining of mortar aspect between two Rigid Body Elements
Angle, is just counterclockwise;
The Plastic Flow constraints of b mortar aspect
Assuming that stone block will not destroy, therefore Plastic Flow occurs over just in the contact surface mortar aspect between stone, and false
If screed face thickness is zero, on contact edge, discontinuous normal direction and tangential velocity interruption value meet flowing criterion:
σn,τsIt is respectively the normal stress in mortar aspect and tangential stress,For the angle of friction of mortar aspect, c is mortar aspect
Cohesiveness, f1(σn,τs)、f2(σn,τs) it is the Mohr-Coulomb yield function of mortar aspect;
Can obtain further
Δvn,ΔusFor the velocity discontinuity value of stone masonry aspect,For plasticity multiplier;
Can be abbreviated as:
For plasticity multiplier;
According to the associated flow rule of the theory of plasticity, for ideal epistemology model, deformation compatibility condition obtain generalized strain
Component should obtain generalized plasticity strain rate component equal to by associated flow rule and yield condition:With
Shi Yaoqiu plasticity multiplier is non-negative:
C internal strength power condition equal with external work power
Being learnt by the principle of virtual work, virtual power and the dissipated power of object internal energy that external force is done are equal, then have
It is continuum internal stress vector,It is the virtual strain within continuum,It is border upper stress vector,It it is border
On virtual strain, W be block deadweight, Q is face power load, V*For virtual velocity;The equation left side respectively results from stone masonry barricade
Neutralize along the internal dissipation power destroyed along sliding surface, on the right of equation, be respectively block deadweight W, borderline power load Q
Equivalent load is in virtual velocity V*On power;
According to stone-laying stone be rigidity it is assumed that the Rigid Body Element of stone will not deform and destroy, the dissipation of internal strength is only
Result from the interface (i.e. mortar aspect) between Rigid Body Element, the therefore internal strength power within continuum
σn,τsIt is respectively the normal stress in mortar aspect and tangential stress,It is respectively the normal direction normal strain in mortar aspect
Rate and tangential shear strain rate,It is border upper stress vector,Being borderline virtual strain, l is the length of mortar aspect, c
For the cohesiveness of mortar aspect,For plasticity multiplier;
According to Theory of Rankine Active Earth Pressure, the active soil of the retaining walls back of the body of any point at distance bankets case depth Z
Intensity of pressure pakExpression formula be:
It is coefficient of active earth pressure, σak=γ Z+q0, it is the vertical stress at degree of depth Z,C' is
The shearing strength of rolling earth behind retaining wall;
The face power load Q then banketed on surface-boundary can be written as:
Γ is that retaining walls carries on the back integral boundary;
Consider further that the deadweight W of stone block, then can obtain:
D velocity boundary conditions
Speed in stone masonry retaining wall is that the velocity boundary conditions on the border b of zero is:
For the coordinate conversion matrix of interface j on the b of border;
(4) the upper bound method nonlinear mathematics programming model of stone masonry retaining wall ultimate bearing capacity is solved
During finding limit load, by unlimited evenly load q on retaining wall rolling earth behind retaining wall surface0It is set to object function, then solves stone masonry
The upper bound method nonlinear mathematics programming model of retaining wall ultimate bearing capacity is:
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610440635.2A CN106126892B (en) | 2016-06-20 | 2016-06-20 | A kind of plastic limit analysis upper bound method of stone masonry retaining wall ultimate bearing capacity |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610440635.2A CN106126892B (en) | 2016-06-20 | 2016-06-20 | A kind of plastic limit analysis upper bound method of stone masonry retaining wall ultimate bearing capacity |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN106126892A true CN106126892A (en) | 2016-11-16 |
CN106126892B CN106126892B (en) | 2018-11-09 |
Family
ID=57470586
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610440635.2A Active CN106126892B (en) | 2016-06-20 | 2016-06-20 | A kind of plastic limit analysis upper bound method of stone masonry retaining wall ultimate bearing capacity |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN106126892B (en) |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107330145A (en) * | 2017-05-26 | 2017-11-07 | 昆明理工大学 | It is a kind of while considering the jointed rock slope analysis of Ultimate Lower Bound Limit of rock mass translation and turning effect |
CN107330146A (en) * | 2017-05-26 | 2017-11-07 | 昆明理工大学 | It is a kind of while considering the jointed rock slope analysis of Ultimate upper bound method of translation and turning effect |
CN107341285A (en) * | 2017-05-26 | 2017-11-10 | 昆明理工大学 | Jointed rock slope Inclining destruction analysis of Ultimate Lower Bound Limit under a kind of seismic force effects |
CN109858108A (en) * | 2019-01-14 | 2019-06-07 | 北京市轨道交通建设管理有限公司 | A kind of polymorphic structure plate ultimate bearing capacity and failure mode acquisition methods and system |
CN110083883A (en) * | 2019-04-04 | 2019-08-02 | 中国水利水电科学研究院 | Three-dimensional slope safety coefficient method for solving based on lower bound limit analysis theorem |
CN110569622A (en) * | 2019-09-18 | 2019-12-13 | 中国电建集团成都勘测设计研究院有限公司 | Retaining wall optimization design method based on multi-objective optimization |
CN114491737A (en) * | 2021-12-30 | 2022-05-13 | 北京市政路桥股份有限公司 | Stability mechanical analysis method for cutting masonry retaining wall |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2005083154A (en) * | 2003-09-11 | 2005-03-31 | Nippon Koatsu Concrete Kk | Foundation pile structure using prefabricated concrete pile, and construction method of foundation pile |
CN103485353A (en) * | 2013-09-24 | 2014-01-01 | 昆明理工大学 | Slope stability analysis slice method based on global optimization |
CN104480962A (en) * | 2014-11-14 | 2015-04-01 | 重庆大学 | Limited filling retaining wall earth pressure distribution calculation method |
-
2016
- 2016-06-20 CN CN201610440635.2A patent/CN106126892B/en active Active
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2005083154A (en) * | 2003-09-11 | 2005-03-31 | Nippon Koatsu Concrete Kk | Foundation pile structure using prefabricated concrete pile, and construction method of foundation pile |
CN103485353A (en) * | 2013-09-24 | 2014-01-01 | 昆明理工大学 | Slope stability analysis slice method based on global optimization |
CN104480962A (en) * | 2014-11-14 | 2015-04-01 | 重庆大学 | Limited filling retaining wall earth pressure distribution calculation method |
Non-Patent Citations (6)
Title |
---|
ZI LI 等: "Rock Wedge Stability Analysis Using Plastic Limit Analysis Method", 《DISASTER ADVANCES》 * |
刘泽 等: "半挖半填工况加筋土挡墙失稳机制试验研究与上限法分析", 《岩石力学与工程学报》 * |
李泽 等: "基于刚性块体系统的岩质边坡稳定性上限法研究", 《岩石力学与工程学报》 * |
王均星 等: "土坡稳定的有限元塑性极限分析上限法研究", 《岩石力学与工程学报》 * |
王均星 等: "考虑孔隙水压力的土坡稳定性的有限元上限分析", 《岩土力学》 * |
魏久坤 等: "基于非线性规划的边坡稳定性分析条分法研究", 《路基工程》 * |
Cited By (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107330145A (en) * | 2017-05-26 | 2017-11-07 | 昆明理工大学 | It is a kind of while considering the jointed rock slope analysis of Ultimate Lower Bound Limit of rock mass translation and turning effect |
CN107330146A (en) * | 2017-05-26 | 2017-11-07 | 昆明理工大学 | It is a kind of while considering the jointed rock slope analysis of Ultimate upper bound method of translation and turning effect |
CN107341285A (en) * | 2017-05-26 | 2017-11-10 | 昆明理工大学 | Jointed rock slope Inclining destruction analysis of Ultimate Lower Bound Limit under a kind of seismic force effects |
CN107330145B (en) * | 2017-05-26 | 2020-07-31 | 昆明理工大学 | Rock slope ultimate bearing capacity analysis lower limit method considering rotation effect |
CN107330146B (en) * | 2017-05-26 | 2020-08-25 | 昆明理工大学 | Rock slope ultimate bearing capacity analysis upper limit method considering rotation effect |
CN109858108A (en) * | 2019-01-14 | 2019-06-07 | 北京市轨道交通建设管理有限公司 | A kind of polymorphic structure plate ultimate bearing capacity and failure mode acquisition methods and system |
CN110083883A (en) * | 2019-04-04 | 2019-08-02 | 中国水利水电科学研究院 | Three-dimensional slope safety coefficient method for solving based on lower bound limit analysis theorem |
CN110083883B (en) * | 2019-04-04 | 2021-06-01 | 中国水利水电科学研究院 | Three-dimensional slope safety coefficient solving method based on limit analysis lower limit theorem |
CN110569622A (en) * | 2019-09-18 | 2019-12-13 | 中国电建集团成都勘测设计研究院有限公司 | Retaining wall optimization design method based on multi-objective optimization |
CN110569622B (en) * | 2019-09-18 | 2022-05-20 | 中国电建集团成都勘测设计研究院有限公司 | Retaining wall optimization design method based on multi-objective optimization |
CN114491737A (en) * | 2021-12-30 | 2022-05-13 | 北京市政路桥股份有限公司 | Stability mechanical analysis method for cutting masonry retaining wall |
CN114491737B (en) * | 2021-12-30 | 2023-07-14 | 北京市政路桥股份有限公司 | Stability mechanical analysis method of cutting masonry retaining wall |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN106126892B (en) | 2018-11-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN106126892A (en) | A kind of plastic limit analysis upper bound method of stone masonry retaining wall ultimate bearing capacity | |
Yang et al. | Three-dimensional failure mechanism of a rectangular cavity in a Hoek–Brown rock medium | |
Jiang et al. | Simulation of cracking near a large underground cavern in a discontinuous rock mass using the expanded distinct element method | |
Dimitri et al. | A parametric investigation of the seismic capacity for masonry arches and portals of different shapes | |
Uzuoka et al. | Three-dimensional numerical simulation of earthquake damage to group-piles in a liquefied ground | |
Cho et al. | Analysis of lateral earth pressure on a vertical circular shaft considering the 3D arching effect | |
Wei et al. | A modified numerical manifold method for simulation of finite deformation problem | |
Chen et al. | Numerical simulation of large deformation in shear panel dampers using smoothed particle hydrodynamics | |
Mokhtar et al. | Lateral displacement and pile instability due to soil liquefaction using numerical model | |
Colas et al. | 2D modelling of a dry joint masonry wall retaining a pulverulent backfill | |
CN104281730A (en) | Great-rotating-deformation plate shell structure dynamic response finite element analysis method | |
Caselunghe et al. | Structural element approaches for soil-structure interaction | |
Dong et al. | Advanced finite element analysis of a complex deep excavation case history in Shanghai | |
Hongyun et al. | Analysis method of the water inrush and collapse in jointed rock mass tunnels: A case study | |
Mostafaei et al. | Stability analysis of arch dam abutments due to seismic loading | |
Issa et al. | Numerical analysis of micromechanical behaviour of granular materials | |
Chambon et al. | Uniqueness studies in boundary value problems involving some second gradient models | |
Vo-Minh et al. | Upper bound limit analysis of circular tunnel in cohesive-frictional soils using isogeometric analysis based on Bézier extraction | |
Tao et al. | Failure and stability analysis of Jinping-I arch dam based on geomechanical model test and nonlinear numerical analysis | |
Zhan et al. | Stability analysis and reinforcement of a high-steep rock slope with faults: numerical analysis and field monitoring | |
CN107066744B (en) | Earthquake-resistant analysis method for subway station in water-rich stratum | |
Tsesarsky et al. | Mechanical response of a jointed rock beam—numerical study of centrifuge models | |
Perozzi | Quantification of the earth pressure acting on corrosion-damaged cantilever retaining walls: An analysis of the soil-structure interaction | |
Aydın Ertuğrul | Effect of soil arching on lateral soil pressures acting upon rigid retaining walls | |
Kang et al. | 3D limit equilibrium stability analysis of concave and convex slopes considering kinematic constraints |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
CB03 | Change of inventor or designer information | ||
CB03 | Change of inventor or designer information |
Inventor after: Li Ze Inventor after: Hu Zheng Inventor after: Xue Long Inventor after: Zhou Yu Inventor after: Wei Jiukun Inventor before: Li Ze Inventor before: Xue Long Inventor before: Zhou Yu Inventor before: Wei Jiukun |
|
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |