CN106092402B - Total stress computing method and safety pre-warning method of large-span steel box girder bridge based on monitored data and temperature stress analysis - Google Patents
Total stress computing method and safety pre-warning method of large-span steel box girder bridge based on monitored data and temperature stress analysis Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106092402B CN106092402B CN201610373912.2A CN201610373912A CN106092402B CN 106092402 B CN106092402 B CN 106092402B CN 201610373912 A CN201610373912 A CN 201610373912A CN 106092402 B CN106092402 B CN 106092402B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- temperature
- stress
- strain
- steel box
- box girder
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims abstract description 59
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 59
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 39
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 32
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 10
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 43
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 29
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000003321 amplification Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000003199 nucleic acid amplification method Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000013307 optical fiber Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013528 artificial neural network Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009412 basement excavation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007781 pre-processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000001215 vagina Anatomy 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01L—MEASURING FORCE, STRESS, TORQUE, WORK, MECHANICAL POWER, MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY, OR FLUID PRESSURE
- G01L5/00—Apparatus for, or methods of, measuring force, work, mechanical power, or torque, specially adapted for specific purposes
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
- Bridges Or Land Bridges (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a total stress computing method and safety pre-warning method of a large-span steel box girder bridge based on monitored data and temperature stress analysis. The total stress computing method comprises a step 1 of acquiring the strain and the temperature of the bridge by using a health monitoring system; a step 2 of separating temperature strain from the actually measured strain; a step 3of computing the uniform temperature and gradient temperature on the upper cross section of the steel box girder; a step 4 of computing axial restraint stress; a step 5 of computing bending restraint stress; a step 6 of computing temperature self-stress; a step 7 of acquiring geostatic stress from a finite element model; and a step 8 of computing the total stress of the large-span bridge in operation. Compared with a conventional early warning method, the early warning method is clear in early warning index and clear in mechanical model, takes account of the influence of temperature load on the large-span bridge structure, and is applicable to popularization in engineering field.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of monitoring data early warning of long-span bridges in civil and traffic engineering.
Background
The safety early warning of the bridge structure is a complex research subject, which not only relates to professional knowledge in the bridge field, but also relates to multiple disciplines such as system science, management science, decision making and the like, and the early warning problem of the bridge structure can be understood more deeply and comprehensively only by comprehensively applying numerous latest discipline knowledge to the bridge structure safety monitoring field. In recent years, early warning methods based on vibration mode analysis and parameter identification are widely researched, but due to the complex characteristics of bridge structures, the technologies have many problems when applied to large bridge structures. With the push of social informatization and the increasingly wide application of technologies such as computers, networks and the like, particularly the installation and operation of bridge structure health monitoring systems, the research of efficient bridge early warning systems is necessary to improve the safe operation condition of bridge structures.
The structural stress can be used as an early warning index to early warn the operation state of the long-span bridge. Stress is the concentration of internal forces on a cross-section of a structural member and can be used to determine whether a structure has failed due to insufficient strength. The stress of the structure truly reflects the stress condition of the structure under external load. In a long-span bridge early warning system, at present, engineering personnel only act on the vehicle-mounted stress to give an early warning index, and the total stress of the structure is not completely considered. The reason for this is that: under the service state of a large-span bridge, the structural reaction is very complex, and the components for monitoring strain data for a long time are more complex. The strain caused by the vehicle load is easy to extract, and the vehicle load strain is directly multiplied by the elastic modulus to obtain the vehicle-mounted stress, so that engineering personnel are used to use the vehicle load stress as an early warning index. However, the bridge is not only subjected to vehicle loads, but also to temperature loads, particularly on large-span bridges. In this case, the stress calculation of the structure becomes more complicated, rather than simply multiplying the measured strain by the modulus of elasticity. For example, in a daily operation state of the bridge in jiangyin, the strain monitoring value can reach 200 μ, the stress is about 42MPa, 7 months in 2014, a truck static load test is performed on the bridge in jiangyin, and when 52 heavy trucks (corresponding to 17689kN) are loaded in a main beam span, the strain of the main beam reaches 156 μ and the stress reaches 32 MPa. From the data calculation, under the normal operation state of the Jiangyin bridge, the service state of the main beam reaches the static load stage of the truck, which is obviously not right. The long-term monitoring data are interfered by temperature load, and the temperature load is not completely converted into stress when acting on the main beam. That is to say, the traditional stress calculation method can not be directly used for solving long-term monitoring data and can not be used for early warning.
The large-span bridge early warning parameters and models are many, and mainly comprise displacement/deflection early warning, vehicle-mounted stress early warning (fatigue early warning), frequency early warning, energy early warning, a grey system theoretical prediction model, a BP neural network algorithm model, a wavelet packet energy spectrum and the like. The Niyiqing and other people utilize GPS data to perform early warning setting on the bridge; the Limega Xia et al uses the frequency stress of the steel box girder to perform early warning; sunzhong et al discuss a method for realizing a novel detection technology by using a Feed-forward back propagation network (Feed-forward BP network), and perform simulation research on damage early warning on a cable-stayed bridge structure by using a structure natural frequency as a basic input of the network. The wavelet packet energy spectrum, Dingjuliang and other systems illustrate the theoretical basis and essence of the structural damage early warning method based on the wavelet packet energy spectrum, and develop the experimental research of the Benchemark structural damage early warning.
These early warning methods have the following disadvantages: 1. traditional early warning parameters (such as structural frequency and the like) are easily influenced by environment, particularly temperature change; 2. the traditional early warning parameters are usually macroscopic indexes (such as structural deflection), the macroscopic indexes only reflect the overall condition of the structure, and in fact, the damage of structural regions or members is a direct cause of structural damage and even collapse, and the macroscopic indexes cannot reflect the local characteristics of the structure; 3. the traditional early warning method is complex in theory and not easy to popularize in the engineering field. Compared with the early warning based on structural stress, the method has the advantages that the physical concept and the mechanical model are clearer, and the method is suitable for operation of engineering personnel, but the problems exist when the method is used for early warning of the long-span bridge.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to solve the technical problem of providing a method for solving the total stress of a large-span bridge in a service state and an early warning method taking the total stress as an evaluation index, which have better precision by considering the influence of temperature strain on load strain, aiming at the defects in the prior art.
In order to solve the technical problems, the invention adopts the technical scheme that:
a structural total stress calculation method of a long-span steel box girder bridge based on monitoring data and temperature stress analysis is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step one, strain and temperature of the bridge collected by a health monitoring system are as follows:
strain of the top plateU1,U2,…Ui…UnStrain of the base plateL1,L2,…Li…LnTemperature T of the top plateU1,TU2,…TUi…TUnTemperature T of the soleplateL1,TL2,…TLi…TLn(ii) a In the formula,UiandLirespectively representing monitored strain data of the top plate and the bottom plate of the ith section; t isUiAnd TLi(ii) monitored temperature data representative of the ith cross-sectional top and bottom plates;
step two, separating temperature strain from the measured strain:
temperature strain of the top plateTU1,TU2,…TUi…TUnTemperature strain of the soleplateTL1,TL2,…TLi…TLnAnd roof board on-board strainVU1,VU2,…VUi…VUnFloor vehicle mounted strainVL1,VL2,…VLi…VLn;
Step three, calculating the uniform temperature and the gradient temperature on the upper section of the steel box girder:
uniform temperature of cross section
TAvgi=TLi
Wherein, TAvgiRepresents the uniform temperature of the i-th section;
temperature gradient of cross section
Tyi=TUi-TLi
Wherein, TyiRepresents the gradient temperature of the ith section;
step four, calculating the axial constraint stress:
uniform temperature induced unconstrained deformation
T=αLTAvgi
Wherein,Tα represents the expansion coefficient of the steel box girder material, L represents the effective span of the bridge structure;
calculating the deformation under axial constraint by actually measured temperature strain of the top plate and the bottom plate
Wherein,lis a steel box girderActual deformation under axial constraint; n denotes a sensor arrangement n cross-sections; the length of the span of the steel box girder is divided into the length according to the number of the sensors, and the length is L/n;
unconstrained axial deformation by nonlinear temperature gradient
σRT(y)=E·α·Tyi
Wherein σRT(y) represents the temperature stress at which the nonlinear gradient temperature is completely converted; n is a radical ofTyAxial force representing temperature stress equivalent;representing the strain generated under the equivalent axial force; h is0Represents the distance of the upper surface of the cross section from the central axis of the cross section; b (y) represents the cross-sectional width and varies with the cross-sectional height; a represents a cross-sectional area; e represents the modulus of elasticity of the structural material. Finally, the unconstrained axial deformation generated by the nonlinear temperature gradient can be calculated as;
axial constraint stress calculation
Wherein,for indicating steel box girdersAxial constraint stress;
step five, calculating bending constraint stress
Unconstrained bending strain and beam-end corner generated by nonlinear temperature gradient
θT=MTL/2EI
Wherein M isTThe temperature stress generated by the nonlinear temperature gradient is equivalent to bending moment;representing the strain generated by the equivalent bending moment; thetaTRepresenting the beam end corner generated by the equivalent bending moment in an unconstrained state; EI represents cross-sectional bending stiffness;
calculating the actual corner of the beam end by actually measuring the temperature strain of the top plate and the bottom plate
Wherein h represents the section height of the steel box girder;
the actually constrained corner and the relationship to the boundary-constrained bending moment are then expressed as
θ′R=θT-θU
Wherein,θ′Rindicating a restrained beam end corner; msRepresenting the bending moment induced by the boundary constraint, the bending constraint stress induced by the bending moment
Wherein, σ'MRepresenting rotational constraint stress;
step six, calculating the self-stress of the temperature
g) On-board stress calculation
σ′V=EVLi
Step seven, obtaining dead weight stress sigma 'from the finite element model'G;
Step eight, calculating the total stress of the large-span bridge during operation:
σ′Total=σ′N+σ′M+σ′V
wherein, σ'TotalIs the total stress.
Strain sensors and temperature sensors are respectively arranged on the top plate and the bottom plate in the 1/4, 1/2 and 3/4 sections of the steel box girder so as to monitor the strain and the temperature of each section of the steel box girder, 2n strain sensors are arranged on n sections of the bridge girder, wherein the n strain sensors are respectively arranged on the top plate and the bottom plate of the steel box girder, and one temperature sensor is also arranged at each strain sensor position.
The temperature strain is separated from the measured strain by the EEMD technique.
A safety early warning method of a long-span steel box girder bridge based on monitoring data and temperature stress analysis is characterized in that total stress calculated by adopting the structural total stress calculation method is used as an early warning index.
The damage early warning under the operation state of the steel box girder is defined as the following formula as an early warning calculation value,
wherein SF represents a stress early warning value under a normal state of the bridge structure, and mu represents a total stress amplification coefficient; rNRepresenting structural allowable stress, or design value stress; the early warning upper and lower intervals can set early warning threshold values according to the structure or the importance of the key area.
Advantageous effects
1. The invention provides a real-time monitoring and early warning method based on structural stress. The method has the advantages that the total stress of the key regions and the components of the structure is calculated by directly utilizing the monitoring data, and the working performance index of the current structure in the operation stage is directly reflected. Meanwhile, the invention greatly reduces the cost of regular manual detection of key areas and areas difficult to detect. The invention is suitable for all bridge types, in particular to long-term monitoring large-span bridges.
2. The temperature stress correlation calculation method provided by the invention can not only obtain the stress size and distribution of the section of the main beam, but also invert the deformation of the bridge structure under the temperature load, thereby greatly improving the high-efficiency utilization rate and deep excavation force of the bridge monitoring data.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a flow chart of a stress warning method.
FIG. 2 is a reaction at a uniform temperature with an axial confinement structure. Graph a shows uniform temperature acting on a simple-supported structure with axial constraint, graph b shows deformation of a simple-supported structure without axial constraint at uniform temperature, and graph c shows deformation of a simple-supported structure with axial constraint at uniform temperature
FIG. 3 is a reaction at a gradient temperature with a rotation restriction. Graph a shows the effect of gradient temperature on a simple-supported structure with rotational constraint, graph b shows the deformation of a simple-supported structure without rotational constraint at the gradient temperature, and graph c shows the deformation of a simple-supported structure with rotational constraint at the gradient temperature
FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional strain and temperature sensor layout.
Fig. 5 is a temperature strain separation diagram. Graph a shows the measured strain, graph b shows the temperature strain separated from the measured strain by the EEMD technique, graph c shows the vehicle load strain, and graph d shows the change in temperature of the main beam over the day.
Fig. 6 shows the temperature stress at a certain time during the span of the bridge in the river or the south. Graph a shows temperature induced axial constraint stress, graph b shows temperature induced self-constraint stress, and graph c shows total temperature stress
FIG. 7 real-time early warning model. The diagram a shows a cross-middle top plate real-time early warning model, and the diagram b shows a cross-middle bottom plate real-time early warning model
The specific implementation mode is as follows:
the present invention is further illustrated by the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and the detailed description, it is to be understood that these examples are given by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation, and that various equivalent modifications of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art after reading the present invention.
1. The axial constraint gradual release concept, fig. 2.
As shown in FIG. 2(a), the simply supported beam is exposed to solar radiation, and the temperature T inside the structure is uniformAvgAnd the beam end is added with rigidity kRIs axially constrained. Releasing as shown in FIG. 2(b)Boundary axial constraint, then beam end will be generatedTIs deformed in the axial direction. As shown in FIG. 2(c), there is actual monitoring data to calculate the actual deformation of the structurelThen the deformation compressed by the boundary constraint can be expressed asThe axial constraint stress generated by the boundary caused by temperature can be calculated through the constrained deformation.
2. Temperature induced axial constraint stress calculation
a) And the strain and the temperature of the bridge are acquired through a health monitoring system. Strain of the top plateU1,U2,…Ui…UnStrain of the base plateL1,L2,…Li…LnTemperature T of the top plateU1,TU2,…TUi…TUnBottom plate TL1,TL2,…TLi…TLn(ii) a In the formula,UiandLirespectively representing monitored strain data of the top plate and the bottom plate of the ith section; t isUiAnd TLiRepresenting the monitored temperature data of the top and bottom plates of the ith cross-section.
The temperature strain is separated from the measured strain by the eemd (ensemble Empirical Mode composition) technique. Temperature strain of the top plateTU1,TU2,…TUi…TUnStrain of the base plateTL1,TL2,…TLi…TLnAnd roof board on-board strainVU1,VU2,…VUi…VUnFloor vehicle mounted strainVL1,VL2,…VLi…VLn。
b) And calculating the uniform temperature and the gradient temperature on the upper section of the steel box girder according to the monitoring temperature data. The invention divides the section temperature into uniform temperature and gradient temperature.
Uniform temperature of cross section
TAvgi=TLi(1)
Wherein, TAvgiRepresents the uniform temperature of the i-th section;
temperature gradient of cross section
Tyi=TUi-TLi(2)
Wherein, TyiRepresents the gradient temperature of the ith section;
c) axial constraint stress calculation
Uniform temperature induced unconstrained deformation
T=αLTAvgi(3)
Wherein,Tα represents the expansion coefficient of the steel box girder material, L represents the effective span of the bridge structure;
calculating the deformation under axial constraint by actually measured temperature strain of the top plate and the bottom plate
Wherein,lthe actual deformation of the steel box girder is generated under the axial constraint; n denotes a sensor arrangement n cross-sections; the length of the span of the steel box girder is divided into the length according to the number of the sensors, and the length is L/n;
unconstrained axial deformation by nonlinear temperature gradient
σRT(y)=E·α·Tyi(5)
Wherein, formula (5) represents the temperature stress to which the nonlinear gradient temperature is completely converted; formula (6) represents the temperature stress equivalent axial force; formula (7) represents the strain produced under equivalent axial force; h is0Represents the distance of the upper surface of the cross section from the central axis of the cross section; b (y) represents the cross-sectional width and varies with the cross-sectional height; a represents a cross-sectional area; finally, the unconstrained axial deformation generated by the nonlinear temperature gradient can be calculated as;
axial constraint stress calculation
Wherein,the axial restraint stress of the steel box girder is shown.
3. The rotational constraint gradual release concept, fig. 3.
As shown in FIG. 3(a), the simply supported beam is exposed to solar radiation, and the temperature inside the structure is gradient TyAnd the beam end is added with rigidity ksIs restricted. If the boundary rotation constraint is released as shown in FIG. 3(b), θ will be generated at the beam endTThe corner of (2) is deformed. Referring to fig. 3(c), the actual monitoring data can calculate the actual beam end corner deformation θ of the structureUThen the corner deformation compressed by the boundary constraint may be represented as θ'R=θT-θUAnd the rotation constraint stress generated by the boundary caused by the gradient temperature can be calculated through the compressed rotation deformation.
4. Temperature induced bending constraint stress calculation
Unconstrained bending strain and beam-end corner generated by nonlinear gradient temperature
θT=MTL/2EI (12)
Wherein M isTThe temperature stress generated by the nonlinear temperature gradient is equivalent to bending moment;representing the strain generated by the equivalent bending moment; thetaTRepresenting the beam end corner generated by the equivalent bending moment in an unconstrained state; EI represents cross-sectional bending stiffness;
calculating the actual corner of the beam end by actually measuring the temperature strain of the top plate and the bottom plate
Wherein h represents the section height of the steel box girder;
the actually constrained corner and the relationship to the boundary-constrained bending moment may then be expressed as
θ′R=θT-θU(14)
Wherein, theta'RIndicating a restrained beam end corner; msRepresenting the bending moment caused by the boundary constraint, the bending constraint stress caused by the bending moment can be calculated by the formula (12-15)
Wherein, σ'MRepresenting rotational constraint stress.
The method for early warning the damage of the steel box girder of the long-span bridge based on consideration of the temperature stress influence comprises the following specific steps:
step 1: extracting bridge strain and temperature data
And the strain and the temperature of the bridge are acquired through a health monitoring system. Strain of the top plateU1,U2,…Ui…UnStrain of the base plateL1,L2,…Li…LnTemperature T of the top plateU1,TU2,…TUi…TUnBottom plate TL1,TL2,…TLi…TLn(ii) a In the formula,UiandLirespectively representing monitored strain data of the top plate and the bottom plate of the ith section; t isUiAnd TLiRepresenting the monitored temperature data of the top and bottom plates of the ith cross-section.
Step 2: processing of monitoring data
The temperature strain is separated from the measured strain by the eemd (ensemble Empirical Mode composition) technique. Temperature strain of the top plateTU1,TU2,…TUi…TUnStrain of the base plateTL1,TL2,…TLi…TLnAnd roof board on-board strainVU1,VU2,…VUi…VUnFloor vehicle mounted strainVL1,VL2,…VLi…VLn。
And step 3: temperature stress calculation
a) Calculating the axial constraint stress caused by the temperature load by adopting a formula (9)
b) Calculating the bending constraint stress caused by the temperature load by adopting a formula (16)
c) Calculation of self-stress caused by temperature load
d) On-board stress calculation
e)σ′V=EVLi(18)
f) Calculation of self-weight stress of long-span bridge
σ′GThe dead weight stress can be obtained according to a finite element model
And 4, step 4: total stress calculation and early warning
Structural total stress: sigma'Total=σ′N+σ′M+σ′V(19)
The damage early warning under the operation state of the steel box girder is defined as the following formula as an early warning calculation value,
wherein SF represents a stress early warning value under a normal state of the bridge structure, and mu represents a total stress amplification coefficient; rNRepresenting structural allowable stress, or design value stress; the early warning upper and lower intervals can set early warning threshold values according to the structure or the importance of the key area.
The calculation method comprises the following specific steps:
step 1: arrangement of bridge strain and temperature sensors
Arranging strain sensors and temperature sensors on the inner top plate and the inner bottom plate of the 1/4, 1/2 and 3/4 sections of the steel box girder to monitor the strain and the temperature of each section of the steel box girder; arranging 2n strain sensors on n sections of the bridge, wherein the n strain sensors are respectively arranged on a top plate and a bottom plate of the steel box girder, and a temperature sensor is also arranged at the position of each strain sensor; step 2: processing of monitoring data
a) And the strain and the temperature of the bridge are acquired through a health monitoring system. Strain of the top plateU1,U2,…Ui…UnStrain of the base plateL1,L2,…Li…LnTemperature T of the top plateU1,TU2,…TUi…TUnTemperature T of the soleplateL1,TL2,…TLi…TLn(ii) a In the formula,UiandLirespectively representing monitored strain data of the top plate and the bottom plate of the ith section; t isUiAnd TLiRepresenting the monitored temperature data of the top and bottom plates of the ith cross-section.
b) The measured strain mainly comprises a high-frequency part and a low-frequency part, wherein the high-frequency part is mainly caused by vehicle load, and the low-frequency part is mainly caused by temperature load. The temperature strain is separated from the measured strain by the EEMD technique. Temperature strain of the top plateTU1,TU2,…TUi…TUnStrain of the base plateTL1,TL2,…TLi…TLnAnd roof board on-board strainVU1,VU2,…VUi…VUnFloor vehicle mounted strainVL1,VL2,…VLi…VLn。
c) And calculating the uniform temperature and the gradient temperature on the upper section of the steel box girder according to the monitoring temperature data. The invention divides the section temperature into uniform temperature and gradient temperature.
Uniform temperature of cross section
TAvgi=TLi
Wherein, TAvgiRepresents the uniform temperature of the i-th section;
temperature gradient of cross section
Tyi=TUi-TLi
Wherein, TyiRepresents the gradient temperature of the ith section;
d) axial constraint stress calculation
Uniform temperature induced unconstrained deformation
T=αLTAvgi
Wherein,Tα represents the expansion coefficient of the steel box girder material, L represents the effective span of the bridge structure;
calculating the deformation under axial constraint by actually measured temperature strain of the top plate and the bottom plate
Wherein,lthe actual deformation of the steel box girder is generated under the axial constraint; n denotes a sensor arrangement n cross-sections; the length of the span of the steel box girder is divided into the length according to the number of the sensors, and the length is L/n;
unconstrained axial deformation resulting from the non-linear temperature gradient. The effect of the nonlinear temperature gradient can be equated to a bending moment and an axial force.
σRT(y)=E·α·Tyi
Wherein σRT(y) represents the temperature stress at which the nonlinear gradient temperature is completely converted; n is a radical ofTyAxial force representing temperature stress equivalent;representing the strain generated under the equivalent axial force; h is0Represents the distance of the upper surface of the cross section from the central axis of the cross section; b (y) represents the cross-sectional width and varies with the cross-sectional height; a represents a cross-sectional area; finally, the unconstrained axial deformation generated by the nonlinear temperature gradient can be calculated as;
axial constraint stress calculation
Wherein,the axial restraint stress of the steel box girder is shown.
e) Bending constraint stress calculation
Unconstrained bending strain and beam-end corner generated by nonlinear temperature gradient
θT=MTL/2EI
Wherein M isTThe temperature stress generated by the nonlinear temperature gradient is equivalent to bending moment;representing the strain generated by the equivalent bending moment; thetaTRepresenting the beam end corner generated by the equivalent bending moment in an unconstrained state; EI represents cross-sectional bending stiffness;
calculating the actual corner of the beam end by actually measuring the temperature strain of the top plate and the bottom plate
Wherein h represents the section height of the steel box girder;
the actually constrained corner and the relationship to the boundary-constrained bending moment may then be expressed as
θ′R=θT-θU
Wherein, theta'RIndicating a restrained beam end corner; msRepresenting the bending moment induced by the boundary constraint, the bending constraint stress induced by the bending moment can be calculated
Wherein, σ'MRepresenting rotational constraint stress.
f) Temperature self-stress calculation
g) On-board stress calculation
σ′V=EVLi
h) Obtaining dead weight stress sigma 'from finite element model'G
i) Total stress calculation of large-span bridge during operation
σ′Total=σ′N+σ′M+σ′V
And step 3: establishing an early warning model
The damage early warning under the operation state of the steel box girder is defined as the following formula as an early warning calculation value,
wherein SF represents a stress early warning value under a normal state of the bridge structure, and mu represents a total stress amplification coefficient; rNRepresenting structural allowable stress, or design value stress; the early warning upper and lower intervals can set early warning threshold values according to the structure or the importance of the key area.
Example (b):
the following takes stress early warning calculation analysis of the suspension bridge of the river-yin bridge under the combined action of vehicle load and temperature as an example, and the specific implementation process of the invention is described as follows:
(1) in the arrangement process of the bridge strain sensors and the temperature sensors, the number, the positions and the parameters of the sensors can be set according to the specific conditions of bridge type, span, bridge deck width, bridge site environment and the like. The steel box girder of the Jiangyin bridge is divided into 8 equal parts, and 72 optical fiber strain sensors and 36 optical fiber thermometers along the bridge direction are arranged on 9 sections. The arrangement of the strain and temperature sensor of the cross section is shown in figure 4; the Jiangyin bridge is a single-span suspension bridge, the support form is a sliding support, and no rotation restriction is caused, so that the boundary rotation restriction condition is not considered in the calculation example.
(2) Data preprocessing and early warning
a) The 3 rd and 7 th strains per section were selectedThe sensor is an analysis object. And the strain and the temperature of the bridge are acquired through a health monitoring system. Strain of the top plateBaseplate strainTemperature T of the top plateU1,TU2,…TUi…TUnBottom plate TL1,TL2,…TLi…TLn(ii) a In the formula,UiandLirespectively representing monitored strain data of the top plate and the bottom plate of the ith section; t isUiAnd TLiThe average of 2 thermometers of the i-th cross-sectional top and bottom plate is shown. Fig. 5 shows the curves of measured strain, temperature strain, vehicle-mounted strain and temperature across the mid-section.
b) The temperature strain is separated from the measured strain by the EEMD technique. Temperature strain of the top plateBaseplate strainAnd roof board vehicle mounted strainVU1,VU2,…VUi…VU9Floor vehicle mounted strainVL1,VL2,…VLi…VL9。
c) And (3) calculating the uniform temperature and the gradient temperature on the upper section of the steel box girder according to the formulas (1) and (2).
d) Axial constraint stress calculation
The unconstrained deformation caused by the uniform temperature is generated,
wherein,Tα is the axial deformation of the steel box girder at uniform temperatureRepresenting the expansion coefficient of the steel box girder material; l represents the effective span of the bridge structure; the temperature load is distributed unevenly along the span direction of the bridge, so the elongation of each section is different, so that the delta L of the sensors on the first section and the ninth section is 87m, and the delta L of the sensors on the ninth section is 173m, so that the axial deformation of the steel box girder generated by uniform temperature under the unconstrained condition can be calculated.
In fact, the bridge cannot be completely free and unconstrained in the axial direction, and axial constraint stress is generated when a certain axial constraint rigidity exists in the boundary. The deformation under axial restraint is first calculated from the temperature strains of the top and bottom plates,
wherein,lthe actual deformation of the steel box girder is generated under the axial constraint; likewise, the Δ L of the sensors in the first and ninth cross-sections is 87m, which is determined by the Δ L of the cross-section being 173m,
not only the steel box girder is deformed axially by the uniform temperature, but also the steel box girder is deformed axially by the nonlinear temperature gradient, and the axial direction generated by the nonlinear gradient temperature is represented by the formulas (5), (6), (7) and (8),
likewise, the Δ L of the sensors in the first and ninth cross-sections is 87m, which is determined by the Δ L of the cross-section being 173m,
finally, the axial constraint stress can be calculated according to equation (9).
e) The temperature self-stress can be calculated according to equation (17), the vehicle-mounted stress can be calculated according to equation (18), and the total stress can be calculated according to equation (19). The temperature stress of the cross section at the highest temperature of the midspan section is shown in fig. 6, fig. 6(a) shows the axial constraint stress of the steel box girder of the Jiangyin bridge at uniform temperature, fig. 6(b) shows the self-constraint stress of the steel box girder at gradient temperature, and fig. 6(c) shows the total temperature stress of the steel box girder.
f) The damage early warning under the operation state of the steel box girder adopts a formula (20)
The main beam of the Jiangyin bridge adopts European standard steel S355J2G3, the national standard is replaced by Q345D, the tensile allowable stress 1 is 230MPa, and the axial compression allowable stress is 230 MPa. The approximate constant load of the bridge in the river and the vagina, which is about 60MP, is obtained by using finite elements. In the embodiment, 35% (or calculated according to the current bridge design stress value) of the bearing capacity utilization rate is selected as the early warning value. The results of the examples are shown in FIG. 7. Fig. 7(a) shows the load capacity utilization of the cross ceiling. Wherein the load bearing capacity is negative due to the top plate compressive stress. The spare degree of the cross section bearing capacity is high, and the safety state is good. Fig. 7(b) also shows that the actual stress of the bottom plate is far away from the safety threshold, the margin degree of the bearing capacity is high, and the bridge operation state is good.
Claims (5)
1. A structural total stress calculation method of a long-span steel box girder bridge based on monitoring data and temperature stress analysis is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step one, strain and temperature of the bridge collected by a health monitoring system are as follows:
strain of the top plateU1,U2,…Ui…UnStrain of the base plateL1,L2,…Li…LnTemperature T of the top plateU1,TU2,…TUi…TUnTemperature T of the soleplateL1,TL2,…TLi…TLn(ii) a In the formula,UiandLirespectively representing monitored strain data of the top plate and the bottom plate of the ith section; t isUiAnd TLi(ii) monitored temperature data representative of the ith cross-sectional top and bottom plates;
step two, separating temperature strain from the measured strain:
temperature strain of the top plateTU1,TU2,…TUi…TUnTemperature strain of the soleplateTL1,TL2,…TLi…TLnAnd roof board on-board strainVU1,VU2,…VUi…VUnFloor vehicle mounted strainVL1,VL2,…VLi…VLn;
Step three, calculating the uniform temperature and the gradient temperature on the upper section of the steel box girder:
uniform temperature of cross section
TAvgi=TLi
Wherein, TAvgiRepresents the uniform temperature of the i-th section;
temperature gradient of cross section
Tyi=TUi-TLi
Wherein, TyiRepresents the gradient temperature of the ith section;
step four, calculating the axial constraint stress:
uniform temperature induced unconstrained deformation
T=αLTAvgi
Wherein,Tα represents the expansion coefficient of the steel box girder material, L represents the effective span of the bridge structure;
calculating the deformation under axial constraint by actually measured temperature strain of the top plate and the bottom plate
Wherein,lthe actual deformation of the steel box girder is generated under the axial constraint; n denotes a sensor arrangement n cross-sections; the length of the span of the steel box girder is divided into the length according to the number of the sensors, and the length is L/n;
unconstrained axial deformation by nonlinear temperature gradient
σRT(y)=E·α·Tyi
Wherein σRT(y) represents the temperature stress at which the nonlinear gradient temperature is completely converted; n is a radical ofTyAxial force representing temperature stress equivalent;representing the strain generated under the equivalent axial force; h is0Represents the distance of the upper surface of the cross section from the central axis of the cross section; b (y) represents the cross-sectional width and varies with the cross-sectional height; a represents a cross-sectional area; e represents the modulus of elasticity of the structural material;
finally, the unconstrained axial deformation generated by the nonlinear temperature gradient can be calculated as;
axial constraint stress calculation
Wherein, σ'NRepresenting the axial constraint stress of the steel box girder;
step five, calculating bending constraint stress
Unconstrained bending strain and beam-end corner generated by nonlinear temperature gradient
θT=MTL/2EI
Wherein M isTThe temperature stress generated by the nonlinear temperature gradient is equivalent to bending moment;representing the strain generated by the equivalent bending moment; thetaTRepresenting the beam end corner generated by the equivalent bending moment in an unconstrained state; EI means cross-section bending rigidityDegree;
calculating the actual corner of the beam end by actually measuring the temperature strain of the top plate and the bottom plate
Wherein h represents the section height of the steel box girder;
the actually constrained corner and the relationship to the boundary-constrained bending moment are then expressed as
θ′R=θT-θU
Wherein, theta'RIndicating a restrained beam end corner; msRepresenting the bending moment induced by the boundary constraint, the bending constraint stress induced by the bending moment
Wherein, σ'MRepresenting rotational constraint stress;
step six, calculating the self-stress of the temperature
On-board stress calculation
σ′V=EVLi
Step seven, obtaining dead weight stress sigma 'from the finite element model'G;
Step eight, calculating the total stress of the large-span bridge during operation:
σ′Total=σ′N+σ′M+σ′V
wherein, σ'TotalIs the total stress.
2. The structural total stress calculation method of claim 1, wherein strain sensors and temperature sensors are arranged on the top plate and the bottom plate of the 1/4 section, 1/2 section and 3/4 section of the steel box girder to monitor the strain and temperature of each section of the steel box girder.
3. Method for calculating the total structural stress according to claim 1, characterized in that the temperature strain is separated from the measured strain by the EEMD technique.
4. A safety early warning method of a long-span steel box girder bridge based on monitoring data and temperature stress analysis is characterized in that the total stress calculated by the structural total stress calculation method according to any one of claims 1 to 3 is used as an early warning index.
5. The safety precaution method according to claim 4, characterized in that the damage precaution of the steel box girder in the operating state is defined as the precaution calculated value by the following formula,
wherein SF represents a stress early warning value under a normal state of the bridge structure, and mu represents a total stress amplification coefficient; rNRepresenting structural allowable stress, or design value stress; the early warning upper and lower intervals can set early warning threshold values according to the structure or the importance of the key area.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610373912.2A CN106092402B (en) | 2016-05-31 | 2016-05-31 | Total stress computing method and safety pre-warning method of large-span steel box girder bridge based on monitored data and temperature stress analysis |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610373912.2A CN106092402B (en) | 2016-05-31 | 2016-05-31 | Total stress computing method and safety pre-warning method of large-span steel box girder bridge based on monitored data and temperature stress analysis |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN106092402A CN106092402A (en) | 2016-11-09 |
CN106092402B true CN106092402B (en) | 2017-04-26 |
Family
ID=57230405
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610373912.2A Active CN106092402B (en) | 2016-05-31 | 2016-05-31 | Total stress computing method and safety pre-warning method of large-span steel box girder bridge based on monitored data and temperature stress analysis |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN106092402B (en) |
Families Citing this family (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107389285B (en) * | 2017-06-16 | 2019-06-04 | 东南大学 | A kind of quick test and evaluation method of bridge changed based on temperature |
CN107292023B (en) * | 2017-06-20 | 2020-07-24 | 哈尔滨工业大学 | Bridge structure state diagnosis method based on narrow-area characteristics of damage index system |
CN107220219B (en) * | 2017-07-10 | 2020-11-20 | 长安大学 | Method for evaluating temperature gradient mode of railway steel box girder bridge |
CN107229837B (en) * | 2017-07-10 | 2020-05-05 | 长安大学 | Combined plate girder bridge temperature gradient mode evaluation method |
CN107871161A (en) * | 2017-11-07 | 2018-04-03 | 中国铁道科学研究院铁道建筑研究所 | A kind of bridge entirety damage alarming method based on neutral net |
CN108052770B (en) * | 2017-12-28 | 2020-04-07 | 大连理工大学 | Long-span bridge girder performance early warning method considering time-varying effect |
CN108534927A (en) * | 2018-05-09 | 2018-09-14 | 华中科技大学 | A kind of building structure, construction temporary structure and construction equipment integral firmness monitoring method |
CN108920881B (en) * | 2018-08-14 | 2024-01-23 | 中国矿业大学 | Main gradient temperature determination method for influencing transverse strain of steel truss bridge expansion device |
CN110986747B (en) * | 2019-12-20 | 2021-03-19 | 桂林电子科技大学 | Landslide displacement combined prediction method and system |
CN113139993B (en) * | 2021-06-22 | 2021-12-14 | 中铁大桥科学研究院有限公司 | Intelligent identification method for bridge linear data |
CN114329967B (en) * | 2021-12-29 | 2024-04-16 | 中国人民警察大学 | Calculation method of temperature stress of steel frame center column |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR100516135B1 (en) * | 2001-12-26 | 2005-09-21 | 김상효 | Constructing Method of Continuous PSC Girder Bridges Using Multi-stepwise Thermal Prestressing Method |
JP2008232998A (en) * | 2007-03-23 | 2008-10-02 | Osaka Univ | Method and device for measuring stress fluctuation distribution of structure, defect detecting method of structure, and risk assessing method of structure |
CN102243671B (en) * | 2011-06-16 | 2013-05-29 | 东南大学 | Method for analyzing temperature gradient effect of flat steel box girder of long-span steel bridge |
CN103065035A (en) * | 2012-09-29 | 2013-04-24 | 长沙理工大学 | Method for designing longitudinal prestressed tendons of variable-section prestressed concrete continuous beam bridge |
CN104166792B (en) * | 2014-08-06 | 2017-06-06 | 中国科学院工程热物理研究所 | A kind of prestressed concrete continuous rigid-framed bridge temperature action finite element method |
-
2016
- 2016-05-31 CN CN201610373912.2A patent/CN106092402B/en active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN106092402A (en) | 2016-11-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN106092402B (en) | Total stress computing method and safety pre-warning method of large-span steel box girder bridge based on monitored data and temperature stress analysis | |
Zhu et al. | Mechanical property and damage evolution of concrete interface of ballastless track in high-speed railway: Experiment and simulation | |
Fan et al. | Vibration-based damage identification methods: a review and comparative study | |
CN104834805B (en) | A kind of building method for estimating damage based on simplified cantilever beam | |
Ni et al. | Fast operational modal analysis of a single-tower cable-stayed bridge by a Bayesian method | |
JP5145501B2 (en) | Large building diagnostic system, large building diagnostic program, recording medium, and large building diagnostic method | |
Ding et al. | Long‐Term Structural Health Monitoring System for a High‐Speed Railway Bridge Structure | |
Chen et al. | Damage detection of long-span bridges using stress influence lines incorporated control charts | |
Law et al. | Updating the reliability of a concrete bridge structure based on condition assessment with uncertainties | |
CN104331595A (en) | Moving principal component correlation analysis for early warning of damage of bridge | |
Caglayan et al. | Evaluation of a steel railway bridge for dynamic and seismic loads | |
JP2007270552A (en) | Signal processing method, signal processing program and recording medium | |
Al-Khateeb et al. | Computing continuous load rating factors for bridges using structural health monitoring data | |
Tang et al. | Ballastless track arching recognition based on one-dimensional residual convolutional neural network and vehicle response | |
Gong et al. | Early warning for abnormal strains of continuous bridges using a proposed temperature–strain mapping model | |
Wang et al. | Model investigations for seismic responses of a scaled polar crane at a nuclear power station | |
Perry et al. | Tipping point analysis of cracking in reinforced concrete | |
Prakash | A deflection-based practicable method for health monitoring of in-service bridges | |
Zhuang et al. | Fatigue flexural performance of short-span reinforced concrete t-beams considering overloading effect | |
Lu et al. | Experimental study and numerical analysis of a composite bridge structure | |
CN111400808B (en) | Road bridge anti-shake and overload performance control system under simulated overload spectrum | |
Wan et al. | Analysis of load carrying capacity of bridges strengthened by extracorporeal prestressing after five years of operation: a case study | |
Rizzo et al. | Diagnostics of Concrete Box Beam Bridges Using Wireless Sensors and Finite Element Analysis | |
Dan et al. | The application of a fuzzy inference system and analytical hierarchy process based online evaluation framework to the donghai bridge health monitoring system | |
Liu et al. | Analysis on deflection characteristics of steel cable-stayed bridge |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |