CN106067100A - The ameliorative way of a kind of product quality and system - Google Patents
The ameliorative way of a kind of product quality and system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106067100A CN106067100A CN201610599228.6A CN201610599228A CN106067100A CN 106067100 A CN106067100 A CN 106067100A CN 201610599228 A CN201610599228 A CN 201610599228A CN 106067100 A CN106067100 A CN 106067100A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- discrepancy
- reason
- defective
- rational technology
- rectify
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06395—Quality analysis or management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/04—Manufacturing
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
- Y02P90/30—Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing
Abstract
This application discloses ameliorative way and the system of a kind of product quality, it is applied to industrial production system, this ameliorative way and system are specially to occurring that the defective product of quality problems and qualified products carry out across comparison, determine discrepancy between the two according to comparing result, determine defective reason and rational technology degree according to discrepancy and originally design；Determine the 5W factor of quality problems according to discrepancy, determine the basic reason of quality problems according to 5W factor and rational technology degree；Formulating measures to rectify and reform according to rational technology degree and basic reason, measures to rectify and reform are used for eliminating discrepancy, are additionally operable to eradicate basic reason.The product quality problem occurring in can realizing producing by the technical program is analyzed confirming, and takes measures to rectify and reform according to product quality problem Producing reason, thus realizes improving the satisfaction of user.
Description
Technical field
The application relates to technical field of quality detection, more particularly, it relates to the ameliorative way of a kind of product quality and be
System.
Background technology
With industrial progress, modern industry produces the different demands increasingly requiring to meet in time user, i.e. work
The requirement on flexibility that industry produces is more and more higher.To this end, the solution cycle request of the quality problems occurring aborning gets more and more,
If able to the quality problems occurring in quickly and efficiently solving to produce, it becomes possible to improve the satisfaction of user, so that enterprise
Get the mastery in keen competition day by day status.
Content of the invention
In view of this, the application provides ameliorative way and the system of a kind of product quality, for the product occurring in production
Quality problem is analyzed confirming, and takes measures to rectify and reform according to product quality problem Producing reason, to improve user's
Satisfaction.
To achieve these goals, it is proposed that scheme as follows:
The ameliorative way of a kind of product quality, is applied to industrial production system, and described ameliorative way specifically includes step:
To occurring that the defective product of quality problems and qualified products carry out across comparison, according to comparing result determine both it
Between discrepancy, determine defective reason and rational technology degree according to described discrepancy and originally design；
Determine the 5W factor of described quality problems according to described discrepancy, according to described 5W factor and described rational technology journey
Degree determines the basic reason of described quality problems；
Formulating measures to rectify and reform according to described rational technology degree and described basic reason, described measures to rectify and reform are used for eliminating institute
State discrepancy, be additionally operable to eradicate described basic reason.
Optionally, described to occurring that the defective product of quality problems and qualified products carry out across comparison, according to contrast knot
Fruit determines discrepancy between the two, determines rational technology degree according to described discrepancy and originally design, comprising:
Described defective product and described qualified products are measured, obtains defective product data and qualified products data；
Determine described discrepancy according to defective product data and qualified products data；
Described discrepancy is contrasted with the described design data originally designing, determines described defective reason；
Realize that difficulty determines described rational technology degree according to the described technique originally designing.
Optionally, the described 5W factor determining described quality problems according to described discrepancy, comprising:
Take fish bone chart to be analyzed described discrepancy, determine described 5W factor according to analysis result.
Optionally, further comprise the steps of:
Described discrepancy, described defective reason, described rational technology degree, described basic reason and described rectification are arranged
Execute and carry out record and stay shelves.
Optionally, described to described discrepancy, described defective reason, described rational technology degree, described basic reason
Carry out record with described measures to rectify and reform and stay shelves, comprising:
Described discrepancy, described defective reason, described rational technology degree, described basic reason and described rectification are arranged
Execute and include 7/7 default management instrument in.
The improvement system of a kind of product quality, is applied to industrial production system, and described improvement system specifically includes:
Across comparison module, for occurring that the defective product of quality problems and qualified products carry out across comparison, according to
Comparing result determines discrepancy between the two, determines defective reason and rational technology according to described discrepancy and originally design
Degree；
Vertical analysis module, for determining the 5W factor of described quality problems according to described discrepancy, according to described 5W because of
Plain and described rational technology degree determines the basic reason of described quality problems；
Module is formulated in measure, for formulating measures to rectify and reform according to described rational technology degree and described basic reason, described
Measures to rectify and reform are used for eliminating described discrepancy, are additionally operable to eradicate described basic reason.
Optionally, described across comparison module includes:
DATA REASONING unit, for measuring described defective product and described qualified products, obtains defective product number
According to qualified products data；
Difference determining unit, for determining described discrepancy according to defective product data and qualified products data；
Data Comparison unit, for contrasting described discrepancy with the described design data originally designing, determines institute
State defective reason；
According to the described technique originally designing, resonable degree determining unit, for realizing that difficulty determines described rational technology
Degree.
Optionally, described vertical analysis module includes:
Fish bone chart analytic unit, for taking fish bone chart to be analyzed described discrepancy, determines institute according to analysis result
State 5W factor.
Optionally, also include:
Experience Sediment Module, for described discrepancy, described defective reason, described rational technology degree, described
This reason and described measures to rectify and reform carry out record and stay shelves.
Optionally, described experience Sediment Module includes:
Data entry element, for by described discrepancy, described defective reason, described rational technology degree, described
This reason and described measures to rectify and reform include 7/7 default management instrument in.
From above-mentioned technical scheme it can be seen that this application discloses ameliorative way and the system of a kind of product quality, should
For industrial production system, this ameliorative way and system are specially to occurring that the defective product of quality problems and qualified products are carried out
Across comparison, determines discrepancy between the two according to comparing result, determines defective reason according to discrepancy and originally design
With rational technology degree；Determine the 5W factor of quality problems according to discrepancy, determine matter according to 5W factor and rational technology degree
The basic reason of amount problem；Formulating measures to rectify and reform according to rational technology degree and basic reason, measures to rectify and reform are used for eliminating difference
Point, is additionally operable to eradicate basic reason.In can realizing producing by the technical program, the product quality problem that occurs is carried out point
Analysis confirms, and takes measures to rectify and reform according to product quality problem Producing reason, thus realizes improving the satisfaction of user.
Brief description
In order to be illustrated more clearly that the embodiment of the present application or technical scheme of the prior art, below will be to embodiment or existing
In having technology to describe, the accompanying drawing of required use is briefly described, it should be apparent that, the accompanying drawing in describing below is only this
Some embodiments of application, for those of ordinary skill in the art, on the premise of not paying creative work, all right
Obtain other accompanying drawing according to these accompanying drawings.
The flow chart of the ameliorative way embodiment of a kind of product quality that Fig. 1 provides for the application；
The flow chart of the ameliorative way embodiment of the another kind of product quality that Fig. 2 provides for the application；
The structured flowchart improving system embodiment of a kind of product quality that Fig. 3 provides for the application；
The structured flowchart improving system embodiment of the another kind of product quality that Fig. 4 provides for the application.
Detailed description of the invention
Below in conjunction with the accompanying drawing in the embodiment of the present application, the technical scheme in the embodiment of the present application is carried out clear, complete
Describe, it is clear that described embodiment is only some embodiments of the present application wholely, rather than whole embodiments.Based on
Embodiment in the application, it is every other that those of ordinary skill in the art are obtained under the premise of not making creative work
Embodiment, broadly falls into the scope of the application protection.
Embodiment one
The flow chart of the ameliorative way embodiment of a kind of product quality that Fig. 1 provides for the application.
It as it is shown in figure 1, the ameliorative way of the product quality of the present embodiment offer is applied to industrial production system, is used for improving
The quality of product produced by industrial production system, this ameliorative way specifically includes following steps:
S101: across comparison is carried out to defective product and qualified products, finds out discrepancy.
It is specially according to the description to quality problems, locking qualified products and substandard product, substandard product i.e. problem
Product, and defective product and qualified products are measured respectively, obtain defective product data and the qualified products of defective product
Qualified products data；Then discrepancy is found out according to defective product data and qualified products data；And by this discrepancy with former
Just the design data of design contrast, and determine the defective reason producing substandard product；Difficulty or ease journey is finally realized to technique
Degree is analyzed, and assesses the rational technology degree of existing technique on the basis of analyzing.
S102: vertical analysis is carried out to defective product.
After obtained the discrepancy between qualified products and defective product by across comparison, analyze method and work by 5W
Problem producing cause is analyzed by skill resonable degree deeply, eventually finds the basic reason of defective product.
5W is the abbreviation of 5why, is a kind of instrument of case study, be specially for the problem occurring ask multiple why,
Carry out deep-cutting analysis with this for problem Producing reason, may be not necessarily limited to when using 5W instrument to ask 5 why, Ke Yigeng
Less or more, it is ensured that basic reason can be found, and find effective executable measure according to basic reason.
When utilizing 5W instrument to carry out case study, it is possible to use fish bone chart carries out case study, fish bone chart is a kind of sending out
The method of existing problem " basic reason ", it also can be referred to as " Ishikawa " or " cause-and-effect diagram ".It is characterized in simple and direct practicality,
Deeply directly perceived.It somewhat looks like fish-bone, and problem or defect (i.e. consequence) are marked on " fish head " outward.Grow fishbone at fish-bone, on
Face is by occurring that chance number lists the possible cause coming into question, and contributing to illustrating is how to influence each other between each reason
's..
S103: formulate measures to rectify and reform according to rational technology degree and basic reason.
By lateral comparison and longitudinal comparison, obtain the basic reason of defective product generation and the rational technology journey of confirmation
After degree, formulate corresponding measures to rectify and reform, thus the reason that solve to produce this discrepancy, eradicate above-mentioned basic reason.More can be with
Optimize design, premised on production technology, by Optimization Work, reduce product and realize difficulty, thus realize product uniformity and
Stability, stops the generation again of defective product.
It from technique scheme it can be seen that present embodiments provide the ameliorative way of a kind of product quality, is applied to work
Industry production system, this ameliorative way is specially to occurring that the defective product of quality problems and qualified products carry out across comparison, root
Determine discrepancy between the two according to comparing result, determine defective reason and rational technology journey according to discrepancy and originally design
Degree；Determine the 5W factor of quality problems according to discrepancy, determine the basic of quality problems according to 5W factor and rational technology degree
Reason；Formulating measures to rectify and reform according to rational technology degree and basic reason, measures to rectify and reform are used for eliminating discrepancy, are additionally operable to eradicate
Basic reason.The product quality problem occurring in can realizing producing by the technical program is analyzed confirming, and according to
Product quality problem Producing reason takes measures to rectify and reform, thus realizes improving the satisfaction of user.
A present embodiment example when concrete practice be presented herein below:
Lateral comparison:
Problem describes: N300PS left front backrest abnormal sound, number of faults: 1 case.
Problem Confirmation: testing N300PS Che Huai road, backrest exists abnormal sound；
1st, abnormal sound part product performance and drawing contrast: qualified, meet design and require；
2nd, abnormal sound part is with the contrast of not abnormal sound part: critical size 424 ± 1 is variant, and abnormal sound part is 425, and abnormal sound part is not
Between 423-424；
3rd, this seat drops in different product bad road contrast: N310/N300, and bad road is tested, without backrest abnormal sound；
4th, different product critical size contrast: N310/N300 drops this size and has no abnormal sound between 423-425；N300PS exists
There is abnormal sound between 423-425；
5th, different product protection lining contrast: N300PS lining is T-shaped, and it is I shape that this lining drops in N310/N300；
Vertical analysis:
The reason that utilize fish bone chart analysis of key size (424 ± 1) uniformity difference
Problem definition: product performance and production process is confirmed meets the requirements, this Trouble cause is design defect.
Containment measure: investigation seat finished product, investigates method: fore-and-aft direction pats backrest 6 times, simulates the test of bad road.
Short-term measure: select backrest, size, between 423-424, normally uses, and between 424-425, reprocesses use.
The analysis of causes: by fish bone chart analytic approach, the immediate cause that locking abnormal sound produces is critical size (424 ± 1)
Cause property difference, basic reason is that device systems error causes part error to accumulate.
Long-term measure: submit Design Change Request table to, lining is changed to I shape by T font.
Embodiment two
The flow chart of the ameliorative way embodiment of the another kind of product quality that Fig. 2 provides for the application.
It as in figure 2 it is shown, the ameliorative way of the product quality of the present embodiment offer is applied to industrial production system, is used for improving
The quality of product produced by industrial production system, this ameliorative way specifically includes following steps:
S201: across comparison is carried out to defective product and qualified products, finds out discrepancy.
It is specially according to the description to quality problems, locking qualified products and substandard product, substandard product i.e. problem
Product, and defective product and qualified products are measured respectively, obtain defective product data and the qualified products of defective product
Qualified products data；Then discrepancy is found out according to defective product data and qualified products data；And by this discrepancy with former
Just the design data of design contrast, and determine the defective reason producing substandard product；Difficulty or ease journey is finally realized to technique
Degree is analyzed, and assesses the rational technology degree of existing technique on the basis of analyzing.
S202: vertical analysis is carried out to defective product.
After obtained the discrepancy between qualified products and defective product by across comparison, analyze method and work by 5W
Problem producing cause is analyzed by skill resonable degree deeply, eventually finds the basic reason of defective product.
5W is the abbreviation of 5why, is a kind of instrument of case study, be specially for the problem occurring ask multiple why,
Carry out deep-cutting analysis with this for problem Producing reason, may be not necessarily limited to when using 5W instrument to ask 5 why, Ke Yigeng
Less or more, it is ensured that basic reason can be found, and find effective executable measure according to basic reason.
When utilizing 5W instrument to carry out case study, it is possible to use fish bone chart carries out case study, fish bone chart is a kind of sending out
The method of existing problem " basic reason ", it also can be referred to as " Ishikawa " or " cause-and-effect diagram ".It is characterized in simple and direct practicality,
Deeply directly perceived.It somewhat looks like fish-bone, and problem or defect (i.e. consequence) are marked on " fish head " outward.Grow fishbone at fish-bone, on
Face is by occurring that chance number lists the possible cause coming into question, and contributing to illustrating is how to influence each other between each reason
's..
S203: formulate measures to rectify and reform according to rational technology degree and basic reason.
By lateral comparison and longitudinal comparison, obtain the basic reason of defective product generation and the rational technology journey of confirmation
After degree, formulate corresponding measures to rectify and reform, thus the reason that solve to produce this discrepancy, eradicate above-mentioned basic reason.More can be with
Optimize design, premised on production technology, by Optimization Work, reduce product and realize difficulty, thus realize product uniformity and
Stability, stops the generation again of defective product.
S204: discrepancy, defective reason, rational technology degree and measures to rectify and reform are filed.
By discrepancy obtained above, defective reason, rational technology degree, basic reason and measures to rectify and reform are carried out
Record stays shelves, is that experience storehouse is set up in the solution of late problems, thus shortens the solution cycle of problem later, in the specific implementation,
The default 7/7 management above-mentioned discrepancy of tool records, defective reason, rational technology degree, basic reason and whole can be used
Change measure.Owing to 7/7 management instrument is the commonly used instrument of enterprise, repeat no more here.
Embodiment three
The structured flowchart improving system embodiment of a kind of product quality that Fig. 3 provides for the application.
It as it is shown on figure 3, the improvement system of the product quality of the present embodiment offer is applied to industrial production system, is used for improving
The quality of product produced by industrial production system, this improvement system specifically includes across comparison module the 10th, vertical analysis module
20 and measure formulate module 30.
Across comparison module 10, for carrying out across comparison to defective product and qualified products, finds out discrepancy, this module
Including Difference determining unit the 11st, Data Comparison unit 12 and resonable degree determining unit 13.
First according to the description to quality problems, locking qualified products and substandard product, the i.e. problem of substandard product is produced
Product, and measuring defective product and qualified products respectively, obtain the defective product data of defective product and qualified products
Qualified products data；Difference determining unit 11 then finds out discrepancy according to defective product data and qualified products data；Data pair
Than unit 12 for this discrepancy and the design data originally designing are contrasted, determine and produce the defective of substandard product
Reason；Resonable degree determining unit 13, for realizing that complexity is analyzed to technique, is assessed existing on the basis of analyzing
The rational technology degree of technique.
Vertical analysis module 20 is for carrying out vertical analysis to defective product.
After obtained the discrepancy between qualified products and defective product by across comparison, analyze method and work by 5W
Problem producing cause is analyzed by skill resonable degree deeply, eventually finds the basic reason of defective product.
5W is the abbreviation of 5why, is a kind of instrument of case study, be specially for the problem occurring ask multiple why,
Carry out deep-cutting analysis with this for problem Producing reason, may be not necessarily limited to when using 5W instrument to ask 5 why, Ke Yigeng
Less or more, it is ensured that basic reason can be found, and find effective executable measure according to basic reason.
Vertical analysis module 20 includes fish bone chart analytic unit 21, and this unit is used for utilizing 5W instrument to carry out case study
When, utilize fish bone chart to carry out case study.Fish bone chart is that one is pinpointed the problems the method for " basic reason ", and it also can be referred to as
" Ishikawa " or " cause-and-effect diagram ".It is characterized in simple and direct practicality, deeply directly perceived.It somewhat looks like fish-bone, problem or scarce
Fall into (i.e. consequence) and be marked on " fish head " outward.Grow fishbone at fish-bone, above by occurring that chance number lists come into question possible former
Cause, how interactional contribute to illustrating is between each reason.
Measure formulates module 30 for formulating measures to rectify and reform according to rational technology degree and basic reason.
By lateral comparison and longitudinal comparison, obtain the basic reason of defective product generation and the rational technology journey of confirmation
After degree, measure is formulated module 30 and is formulated corresponding measures to rectify and reform, thus the reason that solve to produce this discrepancy, eradicate above-mentioned at all
Reason.More can be premised on optimization design, production technology, by Optimization Work, reduce product and realize difficulty, thus realize producing
The uniformity of product and stability, stop the generation again of defective product.
It from technique scheme it can be seen that present embodiments provide the improvement system of a kind of product quality, is applied to work
Industry production system, this improvement system is specially to occurring that the defective product of quality problems and qualified products carry out across comparison, root
Determine discrepancy between the two according to comparing result, determine defective reason and rational technology journey according to discrepancy and originally design
Degree；Determine the 5W factor of quality problems according to discrepancy, determine the basic of quality problems according to 5W factor and rational technology degree
Reason；Formulating measures to rectify and reform according to rational technology degree and basic reason, measures to rectify and reform are used for eliminating discrepancy, are additionally operable to eradicate
Basic reason.The product quality problem occurring in can realizing producing by the technical program is analyzed confirming, and according to
Product quality problem Producing reason takes measures to rectify and reform, thus realizes improving the satisfaction of user.
Embodiment four
The structured flowchart improving system embodiment of the another kind of product quality that Fig. 4 provides for the application.
As shown in Figure 4, the improvement system of the product quality that the present embodiment provides is to set up on the basis of a upper embodiment
Experience Sediment Module 40.
Experience Sediment Module 40 is for filing to above-mentioned discrepancy, defective reason, rational technology degree and measures to rectify and reform.
By discrepancy obtained above, defective reason, rational technology degree, basic reason and measures to rectify and reform are carried out
Record stays shelves, is that experience storehouse is set up in the solution of late problems, thus shortens the solution cycle of problem later, experience Sediment Module 40
Including data entry element 41, data entry element 41 manages the above-mentioned discrepancy of tool records for using default 7/7, does not conforms to
Lattice reason, rational technology degree, basic reason and measures to rectify and reform.Owing to 7/7 management instrument is the commonly used instrument of enterprise, this
In repeat no more.
In this specification, each embodiment uses the mode gone forward one by one to describe, and what each embodiment stressed is and other
The difference of embodiment, between each embodiment, identical similar portion sees mutually.Upper to the disclosed embodiments
State bright, make professional and technical personnel in the field be capable of or use the application.The multiple of these embodiments are changed to ability
Will be apparent from for the professional and technical personnel in territory, generic principles defined herein can be without departing from the application's
In the case of spirit or scope, realize in other embodiments.Therefore, the application be not intended to be limited to shown in this article these
Embodiment, and it is to fit to the wide scope consistent with principles disclosed herein and features of novelty.
Claims (10)
1. an ameliorative way for product quality, is applied to industrial production system, it is characterised in that described ameliorative way specifically wraps
Include step:
To occurring that the defective product of quality problems and qualified products carry out across comparison, determine between the two according to comparing result
Discrepancy, determines defective reason and rational technology degree according to described discrepancy and originally design；
Determine the 5W factor of described quality problems according to described discrepancy, true according to described 5W factor and described rational technology degree
The basic reason of fixed described quality problems；
Formulating measures to rectify and reform according to described rational technology degree and described basic reason, described measures to rectify and reform are used for eliminating described difference
Dissimilarity, is additionally operable to eradicate described basic reason.
2. ameliorative way as claimed in claim 1, it is characterized in that, described to occur the defective product of quality problems with qualified
Product carries out across comparison, determines discrepancy between the two according to comparing result, true according to described discrepancy and originally design
Determine rational technology degree, comprising:
Described defective product and described qualified products are measured, obtains defective product data and qualified products data；
Determine described discrepancy according to defective product data and qualified products data；
Described discrepancy is contrasted with the described design data originally designing, determines described defective reason；
Realize that difficulty determines described rational technology degree according to the described technique originally designing.
3. ameliorative way as claimed in claim 1, it is characterised in that described determine described quality problems according to described discrepancy
5W factor, comprising:
Take fish bone chart to be analyzed described discrepancy, determine described 5W factor according to analysis result.
4. the ameliorative way as described in any one of claims 1 to 3, it is characterised in that further comprise the steps of:
Described discrepancy, described defective reason, described rational technology degree, described basic reason and described measures to rectify and reform are entered
Row record stays shelves.
5. ameliorative way as claimed in claim 4, it is characterised in that described to described discrepancy, described defective reason, institute
State rational technology degree, described basic reason and described measures to rectify and reform to carry out record and stay shelves, comprising:
Described discrepancy, described defective reason, described rational technology degree, described basic reason and described measures to rectify and reform are received
Enter 7/7 default management instrument.
6. an improvement system for product quality, is applied to industrial production system, it is characterised in that described improvement system is specifically wrapped
Include:
Across comparison module, for occurring that the defective product of quality problems and qualified products carry out across comparison, according to contrast
Result determines discrepancy between the two, determines defective reason and rational technology journey according to described discrepancy and originally design
Degree；
Vertical analysis module, for determining the 5W factor of described quality problems according to described discrepancy, according to described 5W factor and
Described rational technology degree determines the basic reason of described quality problems；
Module is formulated in measure, for formulating measures to rectify and reform, described rectification according to described rational technology degree and described basic reason
Measure is used for eliminating described discrepancy, is additionally operable to eradicate described basic reason.
7. improvement system as claimed in claim 6, it is characterised in that described across comparison module includes:
DATA REASONING unit, for described defective product and described qualified products are measured, obtain defective product data and
Qualified products data；
Difference determining unit, for determining described discrepancy according to defective product data and qualified products data；
Data Comparison unit, for contrasting described discrepancy with the described design data originally designing, described in determination not
Qualified reason；
According to the described technique originally designing, resonable degree determining unit, for realizing that difficulty determines described rational technology journey
Degree.
8. improvement system as claimed in claim 6, it is characterised in that described vertical analysis module includes:
Fish bone chart analytic unit, for taking fish bone chart to be analyzed described discrepancy, determines described 5W according to analysis result
Factor.
9. the improvement system as described in any one of claim 6～8, it is characterised in that also include:
Experience Sediment Module, for described discrepancy, described defective reason, described rational technology degree, described at all former
Cause and described measures to rectify and reform carry out record and stay shelves.
10. improvement system as claimed in claim 9, it is characterised in that described experience Sediment Module includes:
Data entry element, for by described discrepancy, described defective reason, described rational technology degree, described at all former
Cause and described measures to rectify and reform include 7/7 default management instrument in.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610599228.6A CN106067100A (en) | 2016-07-26 | 2016-07-26 | The ameliorative way of a kind of product quality and system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610599228.6A CN106067100A (en) | 2016-07-26 | 2016-07-26 | The ameliorative way of a kind of product quality and system |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN106067100A true CN106067100A (en) | 2016-11-02 |
Family
ID=57206665
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610599228.6A Pending CN106067100A (en) | 2016-07-26 | 2016-07-26 | The ameliorative way of a kind of product quality and system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN106067100A (en) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110147935A (en) * | 2019-04-18 | 2019-08-20 | 红云红河烟草(集团)有限责任公司 | A kind of tobacco rolls up the method for building up of quality Comprehensive Model between hired car |
| CN112949955A (en) * | 2019-12-10 | 2021-06-11 | 无锡市环宇脚手架有限公司 | Method for improving product processing technology |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH10217048A (en) * | 1997-02-04 | 1998-08-18 | Nec Corp | Quality improving system |
| CN101458784A (en) * | 2007-12-10 | 2009-06-17 | 洛阳双瑞精铸钛业有限公司 | Dimension overproof rate control method |
| CN102352627A (en) * | 2011-08-03 | 2012-02-15 | 中交第一航务工程勘察设计院有限公司 | Static pressure reinforcing treatment method for pile with unqualified bearing capacity |
| CN103778257A (en) * | 2014-02-27 | 2014-05-07 | 苏州奥科姆自动化科技有限公司 | Method for acquiring and analyzing unqualified reasons of defective products in real time |
| CN104615513A (en) * | 2013-11-05 | 2015-05-13 | 张永军 | Multilevel code standardization breakdown analyzing method |
-
2016
- 2016-07-26 CN CN201610599228.6A patent/CN106067100A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH10217048A (en) * | 1997-02-04 | 1998-08-18 | Nec Corp | Quality improving system |
| CN101458784A (en) * | 2007-12-10 | 2009-06-17 | 洛阳双瑞精铸钛业有限公司 | Dimension overproof rate control method |
| CN102352627A (en) * | 2011-08-03 | 2012-02-15 | 中交第一航务工程勘察设计院有限公司 | Static pressure reinforcing treatment method for pile with unqualified bearing capacity |
| CN104615513A (en) * | 2013-11-05 | 2015-05-13 | 张永军 | Multilevel code standardization breakdown analyzing method |
| CN103778257A (en) * | 2014-02-27 | 2014-05-07 | 苏州奥科姆自动化科技有限公司 | Method for acquiring and analyzing unqualified reasons of defective products in real time |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110147935A (en) * | 2019-04-18 | 2019-08-20 | 红云红河烟草(集团)有限责任公司 | A kind of tobacco rolls up the method for building up of quality Comprehensive Model between hired car |
| CN110147935B (en) * | 2019-04-18 | 2022-07-05 | 红云红河烟草(集团)有限责任公司 | Method for establishing quality comprehensive decision model of tobacco wrapping workshop |
| CN112949955A (en) * | 2019-12-10 | 2021-06-11 | 无锡市环宇脚手架有限公司 | Method for improving product processing technology |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US20160239366A1 (en) | Operation management apparatus, operation management method, and program | |
| CN105247379B (en) | The system and method analyzed for uninterruptible power supply battery detection and data | |
| CN107478455A (en) | A kind of Censoring reliability test method suitable for Weibull distribution type product | |
| CN101996855B (en) | Wafer defect analysis method | |
| CN107122298A (en) | The methods of exhibiting of visual software development process quality | |
| EP3270249A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for a computer-based generation of component fault trees | |
| CN106067100A (en) | The ameliorative way of a kind of product quality and system | |
| CN106844180A (en) | A kind of monitoring and controlling forecast method of OpenStack platforms computing resource | |
| Hui et al. | Research on software reliability growth model based on Gaussian new distribution | |
| CN106445828B (en) | A kind of product test method and device | |
| Aslam et al. | Two-stage group acceptance sampling plan for Burr type X percentiles | |
| CN207008679U (en) | A kind of improvement system of product quality | |
| Déry et al. | Investigation of the effort data consistency in the ISBSG repository | |
| Alverbro et al. | Methods for risk analysis | |
| CN115203059B (en) | Method and system for evaluating reliability of aerospace measurement and control software | |
| CN106445812A (en) | Regression test system and regression test method | |
| Fujiwara et al. | A method of calculating safety integrity level for IEC 61508 conformity software | |
| CN101420650B (en) | Test control method | |
| DE102012101166A1 (en) | Method and system for simulating a monitoring system | |
| CN106230624A (en) | A kind of network quality appraisal procedure and device | |
| KR101403685B1 (en) | System and method for relating between failed component and performance criteria of manintenance rule by using component database of functional importance determination of nuclear power plant | |
| JP4671038B2 (en) | Information system comprehensive analysis method and apparatus | |
| Amuthakkannan et al. | Software quality measurement and improvement for real-time systems using quality tools and techniques: a case study | |
| Gong et al. | A simulation model of kanban software process | |
| Winkler | On usability in requirements trace visualizations |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20161102 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |