CN105976082A - Workload estimation mechanism for company management - Google Patents
Workload estimation mechanism for company management Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN105976082A CN105976082A CN201610249402.4A CN201610249402A CN105976082A CN 105976082 A CN105976082 A CN 105976082A CN 201610249402 A CN201610249402 A CN 201610249402A CN 105976082 A CN105976082 A CN 105976082A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- workload
- parameter
- work
- improvement
- workflow
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0633—Workflow analysis
Abstract
The invention discloses a workload estimation mechanism for company management, which comprises the steps of firstly determining all main workflows which can be related in the life cycle of the whole improvement work, and determining a detailed list of all parameters which potentially affecting the workload or the work time occupied by completing a certain improvement function; presenting the parameters in a problem mode, completing the work after multiple times of discussions of experts, determining each parameter on the level of the minimum granularity, and allocating the workflows and relative weights of the parameters; and establishing pairwise comparison matrixes for each workflow and all parameters in each workflow, wherein the matrixes are filled according to repeatedly discussed expert opinions so as to be used for weight calculation. The workload estimation mechanism eliminates the possibility of potential parameter missing occurred in improvement workload estimation to a great extent, the workload required by completing improvement work for an analysis tool or a product can be clearly indicated, thereby providing price estimation for the improvement work, and accelerating the decision-making process.
Description
Technical field
The invention belongs to workload estimating techniques field, particularly relate to the exploitation of a kind of workload estimation mechanism, a kind of workload for company management estimates mechanism.
Background technology
Workload estimation is a kind of trial that the workload completed needed for a particular task carries out optimum prediction as far as possible, put it briefly, there is currently two class models to estimate for the amount of being operated, it is respectively algorithm model and model based on expertise, the former is devoted to the help of predefined algorithm to derive in a quantitative manner estimated value, for example with function-point method FPA and use-case point UCP, the latter then use the subjective judgment of expert to draw estimated value, such as Delphi method.Existing model is the most not enough in terms of prediction estimated value the most accurately, and reason is comprehensive to contain whole relevant evaluation standards that required workload can produce impact.Therefore, if there being one subjective suggestion to be integrated mutually with mathematical framework, thus the model estimating the workload in analytical tool improved, process has just become a current significant demand.The existing present invention develops a kind of workload for company management specially and estimates mechanism, it is adaptable to the workload estimation to Pei Ke inscription Management Advisory Services (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., i.e. Pei Ke inscription workload estimation mechanism.
Summary of the invention
The deficiency that the present invention exists to overcome prior art, it is provided that a kind of workload for company management is estimated machine-processed, i.e. Pei Ke inscription workload estimation mechanism, this mechanism for carrying out the improvement of data driven type to analytical tool or analysis product.
The present invention is achieved by the following technical solutions: a kind of workload for company management estimates mechanism, and its model carrying out the requirement of evaluation work amount according to series of parameters by exploitation one realizes:
A, first determine the life cycle of whole improvement work in all groundwork streams that may relate to, define multiple workflow respectively, make its most independent, not omission, for each workflow, need to determine that potential impact completes workload shared by a certain improved function or the Verbose Listing of working time whole parameter；
B, above-mentioned parameter present with the form of problem, for finding workflow improves the content of work, and after expert repeatedly discusses, complete this work, and after the rank of fine granularity determines each parameter, next step share out the work stream and relative weighting of each parameter；
C, setting up pairwise comparison matrix for all parameters in all working stream and each workflow, matrix is filled with, for weight calculation according to the expert opinion after repeatedly discussing.
The workload estimation mechanism of the present invention also includes a kind of scoring, the parameter evaluation improvement work that scoring defines according to each:
A, first by conventional yardstick, the potential feedback of parameter being mapped to score value, each parameter being identified can be used for assessment improvement work, and defines one group of possible feedback according to all of parameter,
B, then these feedbacks being mapped in scoring with 1 yardstick assigning to 9 points, the score corresponding to arbitrary parameter is i.e. the product of this parameters weighting and the feedback relevant scoring of this parameter；
C, the weighted mean of all parameter scores are final score, represent the workload needed for this improvement work, and using this final score is main, medium and secondary three ranks by improvement workload partition；
D, the corresponding classification of improvement work can help to formulate PTS based on improvement work and collect to client and realize the reasonable interval of expense needed for this improvement work.
Workload estimation mechanism uses AHP analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to determine weight.
The invention provides a kind of indicating mechanism based on marking, for indicating analytical tool or analyzing the workload needed for improved product.When needing to provide new improved function in existing instrument, participate in each side and may produce different opinions in terms of determining the size of the workload reaching ideally required.In this case, the present invention can help to provide the quantitative estimation to required workload, thus reduces the scope to new improved function iterative re-evaluation.
The invention has the beneficial effects as follows: the present invention eliminates the probability occurring potential parameter to lack when assessment improvement workload to a great extent, and by the way of taking predefined form structure, it is iterated classification for improvement work, thus improves work efficiency.This model also defines the scope of improvement work, thus eliminates the request not as improvement work, such as instrument mistake, new tool exploitation etc..Workload estimation mechanism in the present invention can clearly indicate the workload needed for the improvement work of analytical tool or analysis product, provides price budget for improvement work and accelerates decision making process.
Detailed description of the invention
Below in conjunction with detailed description of the invention, the present invention is described in detail.
A kind of workload for company management estimates mechanism, it carrys out, according to series of parameters, model that evaluation work amount requires by exploitation one and realizes: a, first determine the life cycle of whole improvement work in all groundwork streams that may relate to, define multiple workflow respectively, make its most independent, not omission, for each workflow, need to determine that potential impact completes workload shared by a certain improved function or the Verbose Listing of working time whole parameter；B, above-mentioned parameter present with the form of problem, for finding workflow improves the content of work, and after expert repeatedly discusses, complete this work, and after the rank of fine granularity determines each parameter, next step share out the work stream and relative weighting of each parameter；C, setting up pairwise comparison matrix for all parameters in all working stream and each workflow, matrix is filled with, for weight calculation according to the expert opinion after repeatedly discussing.
The workload estimation mechanism of the present invention also includes a kind of scoring, the parameter evaluation improvement work that scoring defines according to each: a, first by conventional yardstick, the potential feedback of parameter is mapped to score value, each parameter being identified can be used for assessment improvement work, and define one group of possible feedback according to all of parameter, b, then these feedbacks being mapped in scoring with 1 yardstick assigning to 9 points, the score corresponding to arbitrary parameter is i.e. the product of this parameters weighting and the feedback relevant scoring of this parameter；C, the weighted mean of all parameter scores are final score, represent the workload needed for this improvement work, and using this final score is main, medium and secondary three ranks by improvement workload partition；D, the corresponding classification of improvement work can help to formulate PTS based on improvement work and collect to client and realize the reasonable interval of expense needed for this improvement work, and workload estimation mechanism uses AHP analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to determine weight.
Finally should be noted that; above content is only in order to illustrate technical scheme; rather than limiting the scope of the invention, simple modification that technical scheme is carried out by those of ordinary skill in the art or equivalent, all without departing from the spirit and scope of technical solution of the present invention.
Claims (3)
1. the workload for company management estimates mechanism, it is characterised in that: the model that described workload estimation mechanism carrys out the requirement of evaluation work amount by exploitation one according to series of parameters realizes:
A, first determine the life cycle of whole improvement work in all groundwork streams that may relate to, define multiple workflow respectively, make its most independent, not omission, for each workflow, need to determine that potential impact completes workload shared by a certain improved function or the Verbose Listing of working time whole parameter；
B, above-mentioned parameter present with the form of problem, for finding workflow improves the content of work, and after expert repeatedly discusses, complete this work, after determining each parameter in the rank of fine granularity, next step distributes described workflow and the relative weighting of each parameter；
C, setting up pairwise comparison matrix for all parameters in all working stream and each workflow, matrix is filled with, for weight calculation according to the expert opinion after repeatedly discussing.
A kind of workload for company management the most according to claim 1 estimates mechanism, it is characterised in that: described workload estimation mechanism also includes a kind of scoring, the parameter evaluation improvement work that described scoring defines according to each:
A, first by conventional yardstick, the potential feedback of parameter being mapped to score value, each parameter being identified can be used for assessment improvement work, and defines one group of possible feedback according to all of parameter,
B, then these feedbacks being mapped in scoring with 1 yardstick assigning to 9 points, the score corresponding to arbitrary parameter is i.e. the product of this parameters weighting and the feedback relevant scoring of this parameter；
C, the weighted mean of all parameter scores are final score, represent the workload needed for this improvement work, and using this final score is main, medium and secondary three ranks by improvement workload partition；
D, the corresponding classification of improvement work can help to formulate PTS based on improvement work and collect to client and realize the reasonable interval of expense needed for this improvement work.
A kind of workload for company management the most according to claim 1 estimates mechanism, it is characterised in that: described workload estimation mechanism uses AHP analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to determine weight.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610249402.4A CN105976082A (en) | 2016-04-21 | 2016-04-21 | Workload estimation mechanism for company management |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610249402.4A CN105976082A (en) | 2016-04-21 | 2016-04-21 | Workload estimation mechanism for company management |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN105976082A true CN105976082A (en) | 2016-09-28 |
Family
ID=56994785
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610249402.4A Pending CN105976082A (en) | 2016-04-21 | 2016-04-21 | Workload estimation mechanism for company management |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN105976082A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106779607A (en) * | 2016-12-22 | 2017-05-31 | 上海爱韦讯信息技术股份有限公司 | The method and system of software project cost estimation are realized based on computer software |
-
2016
- 2016-04-21 CN CN201610249402.4A patent/CN105976082A/en active Pending
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106779607A (en) * | 2016-12-22 | 2017-05-31 | 上海爱韦讯信息技术股份有限公司 | The method and system of software project cost estimation are realized based on computer software |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Thanki et al. | A quantitative framework for lean and green assessment of supply chain performance | |
| Nasab et al. | An improvement of quantitative strategic planning matrix using multiple criteria decision making and fuzzy numbers | |
| Wu et al. | Evaluation the drivers of green supply chain management practices in uncertainty | |
| Alwaer et al. | Key performance indicators (KPIs) and priority setting in using the multi-attribute approach for assessing sustainable intelligent buildings | |
| Gupta et al. | A quantitative analysis of the relationship between drivers of innovativeness and performance of MSMEs | |
| Bhatnagar et al. | Analytical customer relationship management in insurance industry using data mining: a case study of Indian insurance company | |
| Jetmarová | Benchmarking: methods of raising company efficiency by learning from the best-in-class | |
| CN105976082A (en) | Workload estimation mechanism for company management | |
| Singh | MCDM based model for sustainable green development through modern production techniques | |
| Zeynali et al. | A hybrid fuzzy multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) approach to combination of materials selection | |
| Jiang et al. | A fuzzy DEMATEL method to analyze the criteria for sustainable supplier selection | |
| Chlomoudis et al. | A business excellence approach for the port industry | |
| Erjavec et al. | SMEs “Growing Smart”: The Complementarity of Intangible and Digital Investment in Small Firms and Their Contribution to Firm Performance | |
| Long Chen | Logit models for early warning of distressed capital projects | |
| Sahu et al. | Appraisement and benchmarking of supply chain performance extent: a fuzzy grey relation method | |
| Tong et al. | The evaluation of lean logistics performance based on balanced score card and unascertained sets | |
| Iorga et al. | Matrix-type model to control the business processes | |
| Tsai et al. | The exponential grey forecasting model for CO2 emissions in Taiwan | |
| Quan | Analysis of Network Marketing Performance Evaluation System Based on BP Neural Network Clustering Algorithm | |
| Jiang et al. | Sustainable lean redesign of manufacturing enterprises | |
| Zhu et al. | Calibration of rail transit assignment model with automated fare collection data and a parallel genetic algorithm | |
| Kasemsap | The role of sustainable performance measurement system in global supply chain | |
| Mojahed et al. | Using engineering economy techniques with group topsis method for best project selection | |
| Wang et al. | Novel metrics for social collaboration processes | |
| Rodríguez et al. | Trade-offs between Environmental and Economic Objectives in Closed-Loop Supply Chains |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20160928 |