CN105718367A - Method and system for automatically evaluating quality of IP core - Google Patents
Method and system for automatically evaluating quality of IP core Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN105718367A CN105718367A CN201510713874.6A CN201510713874A CN105718367A CN 105718367 A CN105718367 A CN 105718367A CN 201510713874 A CN201510713874 A CN 201510713874A CN 105718367 A CN105718367 A CN 105718367A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- evaluation
- file
- test
- evaluated
- deposited
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/362—Software debugging
- G06F11/3648—Software debugging using additional hardware
- G06F11/3652—Software debugging using additional hardware in-circuit-emulation [ICE] arrangements
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/30—Circuit design
- G06F30/39—Circuit design at the physical level
Abstract
The invention relates to a method and a system for automatically evaluating the quality of an IP core. The method comprises the following steps: receiving a delivery item data packet of a to-be-evaluated IP core; classifying files in the delivery item data packet according to evaluated items and storing the same class of files into data storage catalogues, corresponding to the evaluated items, for the class of files; determining the evaluated item selected by a user and transferring an evaluation tool corresponding to the evaluated item and the files stored in the corresponding data storage catalogue; and evaluating the files stored in the data storage catalogue by the evaluation tool to obtain an evaluation result and outputting the evaluation result. The IP core is evaluated by the evaluation tool corresponding to one evaluated item in a transferring manner; and an evaluator does not need to manually evaluate various evaluated items one by one by the evaluation tools, so that the evaluation efficiency is improved; the error caused by a manual operation is reduced; and objective and fast evaluation on the quality of the IP core is achieved.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to IP kernel evaluation and test technical field, be specifically related to a kind of IP kernel quality method for automatically evaluating and system.
Background technology
The mainstream technology of contemporary integrated circuits design is SoC (SystemonChip, full name the is system level chip) designing technique based on IP kernel (intellectualpropertycore, full name is IP core).The prefered method of SoC design has been become based on the SoC design method of IP kernel multiplex technique.Therefore the top priority carrying out SoC chip research and development is exactly pick out high-quality IP kernel from the IP kernel of numerous similar types.The quality of IP kernel is the important component part in the quality certification system of SoC chip, has become as the bottleneck of restriction SoC chip quality, is the key factor affecting chip total quality.In order to ensure the quality of SoC chip, improve the design efficiency of SoC, need in a hurry to propose a set of evaluating method that can comprehensively weigh IP kernel quality.
Include the evaluation and test of multiple project for the quality assessment of IP kernel, for instance the evaluation and test to code quality, the evaluation and test to power consumption, to the evaluation and test of timing performance, the evaluation and test of verification quality, designing quality evaluation and test etc..Evaluation and test for each project, it is possible to can use different eda tools, therefore conventional at present evaluating method is to adopt corresponding software tool to implement respectively for different evaluation and test projects.Being specially reviewer uses these eda tools that each evaluation and test project is evaluated and tested one by one by hand, and process is loaded down with trivial details, evaluation and test inefficiency, and the probability made a mistake can increase.
Therefore, it is necessary to build a general IP kernel quality automatic evaluation system to complete IP kernel quality assessment task quick, objective.
Summary of the invention
The technical problem to be solved be how objective, quickly IP kernel quality is evaluated and tested.
For solving above-mentioned technical problem, the present invention proposes a kind of IP kernel quality method for automatically evaluating and system.
First aspect, this IP kernel quality method for automatically evaluating includes:
Receive the payment item data bag of IP kernel to be evaluated；
By the file in described payment item data bag according to being used for the classification of the items evaluated and tested, and same category of file is deposited to category file and be used in the data storing directory corresponding to the project evaluated and tested；
Determine the evaluation and test project that user selects, and call the file deposited in the evaluating tool corresponding with this evaluation and test project and corresponding data storing directory；
Utilize this evaluating tool that the file deposited in this data storing directory is evaluated and tested, obtain evaluation result, and this evaluation result is exported.
Optionally, the file deposited in described data storing directory includes IP kernel data file, for the constraint information file of each evaluation and test project and/or the configuration information file to the evaluating tool that each evaluation and test project uses.
Optionally, described utilize this evaluating tool that the file deposited in this data storing directory is evaluated and tested, including:
According to the constraint information file deposited in this data storing directory, the constraint information that evaluation and test is required is configured；
According to the configuration information file deposited in this data storing directory, this evaluating tool is configured；
According to the constraint information configured, utilize the evaluating tool configured that the IP kernel data file deposited in this data storing directory is evaluated and tested.
Optionally, the method also includes:
Check whether described payment item data bag comprises the file needed for each evaluation and test project, and inspection result is fed back to user；
Wherein, described inspection result includes lacking required file in described payment item data bag evaluation and test project and the required file that this evaluation and test project lacks.
Optionally, the method also includes:
To store to evaluation result data base for the evaluation result obtained after the evaluation and test of each evaluation and test project, generate the report of IP kernel quality assessment.
Second aspect, this IP kernel quality automatic evaluation system includes:
Receiver module, for receiving the payment item data bag of IP kernel to be evaluated；
Management module, for by the file in described payment item data bag according to being used for the classification of the items evaluated and tested, and same category of file is deposited to category file and is used in the data storing directory corresponding to the project evaluated and tested；
Calling module, for determining the evaluation and test project that user selects, and calls the file deposited in the evaluating tool corresponding with this evaluation and test project and corresponding data storing directory；
Evaluation and test module, for utilizing this evaluating tool that the file deposited in this data storing directory is evaluated and tested, obtains evaluation result, and is exported by this evaluation result.
Optionally, described calling module calls described evaluating tool by evaluating tool interface module.
Optionally, the output of described evaluation result is operated interface to Graphic User by described evaluation and test module.
Optionally, the file deposited in described data storing directory includes IP kernel data file, for the constraint information file of each evaluation and test project and/or the configuration information file to the evaluating tool that each evaluation and test project uses.
Optionally, described evaluation and test module includes:
First dispensing unit, for according to the constraint information file deposited in this data storing directory, configuring the constraint information that evaluation and test is required；
Second dispensing unit, for according to the configuration information file deposited in this data storing directory, configuring this evaluating tool；
Evaluation and test unit, for according to the constraint information configured, utilizing the evaluating tool configured that the IP kernel data file deposited in this data storing directory is evaluated and tested.
In IP kernel quality method for automatically evaluating provided by the invention and system, utilize the evaluating tool corresponding with evaluation and test project that IP kernel is evaluated and tested by the mode called.After user selects an evaluation and test project, call the evaluating tool of correspondence according to this evaluation and test project, utilize this evaluating tool to carry out evaluating and testing the evaluation result obtaining correspondence.Just the evaluation and test work to each evaluation and test project can be completed according to this process.Visible, in whole process, user has only to select evaluation and test project, use evaluating tool that each evaluation and test project is evaluated and tested one by one by hand without reviewer, therefore evaluation and test process becomes simple, evaluation and test efficiency is improved, decrease the error owing to manual operation causes, it is achieved that IP kernel quality is carried out objective, quickly evaluate and test.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Can be more clearly understood from inventive feature information and advantage by reference accompanying drawing, accompanying drawing is schematic and should not be construed as and the present invention is carried out any restriction, in the accompanying drawings:
Fig. 1 illustrates the schematic flow sheet according to IP kernel quality method for automatically evaluating one embodiment of the present invention；
Fig. 2 illustrates the schematic flow sheet according to the IP kernel another embodiment of quality method for automatically evaluating of the present invention；
Fig. 3 illustrates the structured flowchart according to IP kernel quality automatic evaluation system one embodiment of the present invention；
Fig. 4 illustrates the Graphic User operation interface in IP kernel quality automatic evaluation system provided by the invention.
Detailed description of the invention
In order to be more clearly understood that the above-mentioned purpose of the present invention, feature and advantage, below in conjunction with the drawings and specific embodiments, the present invention is further described in detail.It should be noted that when not conflicting, embodiments herein and the feature in embodiment can be mutually combined.
Elaborate a lot of detail in the following description so that fully understanding the present invention; but; the present invention can also adopt other to be different from other modes described here to implement, and therefore, protection scope of the present invention is by the restriction of following public specific embodiment.
The present invention provides a kind of IP kernel quality method for automatically evaluating, as it is shown in figure 1, the method includes:
Step S1, receive the payment item data bag of IP kernel to be evaluated；
Step S2, by the file in described payment item data bag according to being used for the classification of the items evaluated and tested, and same category of file is deposited to category file and is used in the data storing directory corresponding to the project evaluated and tested；
Step S3, determine the evaluation and test project that user selects, and call the file deposited in the evaluating tool corresponding with this evaluation and test project and corresponding data storing directory；
Step S4, utilize this evaluating tool that the file deposited in this data storing directory is evaluated and tested, obtain evaluation result, and this evaluation result is exported.
In IP kernel quality method for automatically evaluating provided by the invention, in step S2, criteria for classification is the file project for evaluating and testing, namely the file for evaluating and testing identical items is classified as a class, such as the file being used for evaluating and testing this project of code quality is classified as a class, deposit to the data storing directory corresponding with evaluation and test this project of code quality, so the benefit of classification is easy for follow-up calling work, arranges the benefit of data storing directory and is easy for IP and evaluates and tests the management of data.
The present invention utilizes the evaluating tool corresponding with evaluation and test project that IP kernel is evaluated and tested by the mode called.After user selects an evaluation and test project, call the evaluating tool of correspondence according to this evaluation and test project, utilize this evaluating tool to carry out evaluating and testing the evaluation result obtaining correspondence.Just the evaluation and test work to each evaluation and test project can be completed according to this process.Visible, in whole process, user has only to select evaluation and test project, use evaluating tool that each evaluation and test project is evaluated and tested one by one by hand without reviewer, therefore evaluation and test process becomes simple, evaluation and test efficiency is improved, decrease the error owing to manual operation causes, it is achieved that IP kernel quality is carried out objective, quickly evaluate and test.
In actual applications, evaluating tool is generally EDA evaluating tool, and so-called evaluating tool is evaluating software.
In being embodied as, the file deposited in described data storing directory can include IP kernel data file, for the constraint information file of each evaluation and test project and/or the configuration information file to the evaluating tool that each evaluation and test project uses.
Understandable it is, so-called IP kernel data file is data file to be evaluated in IP kernel, constraint information file provides constraints or the file on evaluation and test border for evaluation and test process, and configuration information file is to provide the file of parameter configuration for corresponding evaluating tool.
Advantage of this is that, the file owing to depositing in data storing directory is pay the file in item data bag, and paying item data bag is that user inputs, and therefore can customize different configuration informations according to the demand of user.Owing to configuration information, constraint information etc. are that user is ready at the very start, when calling evaluating tool or in evaluation and test process, directly invoking configuration, use, the configuration to evaluating tool, the setting to constraints all carry out automatically, reduce the error of human configuration, setting.
When the file deposited in data storing directory includes IP kernel data file, the constraint information file for each evaluation and test project and the configuration information file to the evaluating tool that each evaluation and test project uses, the evaluation and test process in step S4 can include not shown:
Step S41, according to the constraint information file deposited in this data storing directory, the constraint information that evaluation and test is required is configured；
Step S42, according to the configuration information file deposited in this data storing directory, this evaluating tool is configured；
Step S43, according to the constraint information configured, utilize the evaluating tool configured that the IP kernel data file deposited in this data storing directory is evaluated and tested.
First relevant information is configured by above-mentioned evaluation and test process, then evaluates and tests again.
In being embodied as, when described payment item data bag lacks the file needed for a certain evaluation and test project, the evaluation and test of this evaluation and test project be cannot be carried out.To this, IP kernel quality method for automatically evaluating provided by the invention may also include that
Check whether described payment item data bag comprises the file needed for each evaluation and test project, and inspection result is fed back to user；
Wherein, described inspection result includes lacking required file in described payment item data bag evaluation and test project and the required file that this evaluation and test project lacks.
Mode here by integrity checking, it is determined which evaluation and test project can carry out, which evaluation and test project is not available for, and which required file is the evaluation and test project being not available for lack, it is simple to user supplements.
In being embodied as, IP kernel quality method for automatically evaluating provided by the invention may also include that
To store to evaluation result data base for the evaluation result obtained after the evaluation and test of each evaluation and test project, generate the report of IP kernel quality assessment.
Due to user it is generally required to IP kernel is evaluated and tested from many aspects, here all evaluation results generated are arranged, generate the report of IP kernel quality assessment, reflect the quality condition of IP kernel on the whole, it is simple to user understands the integral status of IP kernel.
In actual applications, evaluation and test project has code quality, verification quality, designing quality, Formal Verification, timing performance, power consumption quality, measurability quality etc..As in figure 2 it is shown, integrity checking can carry out before to the document classification paid in item data bag.
In fig. 2 it can be seen that the file paid in item data bag has been divided into 7 classes, wherein namely the file of verification quality tolerance is included test platform, verification vectors and can comprehensive RTL source file by the file for evaluating and testing verification quality；Wherein include can comprehensively RTL file, technology library file and comprehensive constraint file for the file of designing quality tolerance；Wherein include can comprehensive RTL source file for the file of Formal Verification；The file of timing performance tolerance includes Time-Series analysis unbound document；The file of power consumption quality metric includes power consumption analysis unbound document；The file of measurability quality metric includes measurability script file and can comprehensive RTL source file.
By calling corresponding evaluating tool, obtain corresponding evaluation result.Wherein, the evaluation result obtained after code quality being evaluated and tested is code quality tolerance report；The evaluation result obtained after wherein verification quality being evaluated and tested is verification quality tolerance report；The evaluation result obtained after wherein designing quality being evaluated and tested is designing quality tolerance report；The evaluation result obtained after wherein Formal Verification being evaluated and tested is formalization audit report；The evaluation result wherein timing performance evaluation and test obtained is design sequential quality metric report；The evaluation result wherein power consumption quality assessment obtained is the report of power consumption quality metric；It it is wherein the report of measurability quality metric to the evaluation result obtained after measurability quality assessment.Finally all of tolerance report being deposited to evaluation result data base, form overall report of accessment and test, this report of accessment and test can be used as user and picks out the important evidence of high-quality IP kernel.
Based on identical inventive concept, the present invention also provides for a kind of IP kernel quality automatic evaluation system, as it is shown on figure 3, this system 100 includes:
Receiver module 101, for receiving the payment item data bag of IP kernel to be evaluated；
Management module 102, for by the file in described payment item data bag according to being used for the classification of the items evaluated and tested, and same category of file is deposited to category file and is used in the data storing directory corresponding to the project evaluated and tested；
Calling module 103, for determining the evaluation and test project that user selects, and calls the file deposited in the evaluating tool corresponding with this evaluation and test project and corresponding data storing directory；
Evaluation and test module 104, for utilizing this evaluating tool that the file deposited in this data storing directory is evaluated and tested, obtains evaluation result, and is exported by this evaluation result.
Optionally, described calling module calls described evaluating tool by evaluating tool interface module.
Evaluating tool interface module, uses what Script Programming technology realized evaluating tool to call the configuration with constraint information.Utilizing this interface module can call different types of evaluating tool, therefore used EDA evaluating tool can be docked to flexibly in evaluating system freely by interface module by the present invention according to the evaluation and test demand of user.
Optionally, the output of described evaluation result is operated interface to Graphic User by described evaluation and test module.
Graphic User operation interface, available Script Programming graphical tool case realizes.
Optionally, the file deposited in described data storing directory includes IP kernel data file, for the constraint information file of each evaluation and test project and/or the configuration information file to the evaluating tool that each evaluation and test project uses.
Optionally, described evaluation and test module includes:
First dispensing unit, for according to the constraint information file deposited in this data storing directory, configuring the constraint information that evaluation and test is required；
Second dispensing unit, for according to the configuration information file deposited in this data storing directory, configuring this evaluating tool；
Evaluation and test unit, for according to the constraint information configured, utilizing the evaluating tool configured that the IP kernel data file deposited in this data storing directory is evaluated and tested.
Fig. 4 is a kind of Graphic User operation interface, user selects an evaluation and test project on the surface, such as code quality, automatic evaluation system provided by the invention determines, according to the operation of user, the evaluation and test project that user selects, calling module calls corresponding evaluating tool and corresponding file, code quality is evaluated and tested by evaluation and test module, obtains the evaluation result of code quality, and is shown on the surface by evaluation result.Visual evaluation and test operating environment, facilitates user to get information about evaluation and test operation and evaluation and test flow process, it is simple to man-machine interaction.In actual applications, automatic evaluation system provided by the invention is a software implementation operating environment.Native system is the evaluation and test environment of an opening, can be used for quality assessment by convenient integrated existing evaluating tool by evaluating tool interface module.
In sum, when reviewer carries out IP kernel evaluation and test, having only to input pay item data bag and select evaluation and test project, evaluating method provided by the invention and system call evaluating tool automatically, automatic phasing related parameter configures, and concrete quality assessment is automatically performed by corresponding evaluating tool.It is achieved that quickly, accurately, automatization IP kernel quality is carried out objective evaluating, drastically reduce the area the workload of reviewer, reduce subjective mistake to go, farthest reduce the impact of anthropic factor, it is ensured that the fairness of quality assessment result and reliability.
In the present invention, term " first ", " second " only for descriptive purposes, and it is not intended that instruction or hint relative importance.Term " multiple " refers to two or more, unless otherwise clear and definite restriction.
Although being described in conjunction with the accompanying embodiments of the present invention, but those skilled in the art can make various modifications and variations without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention, and such amendment and modification each fall within the scope being defined by the appended claims.
Claims (10)
1. an IP kernel quality method for automatically evaluating, it is characterised in that including:
Receive the payment item data bag of IP kernel to be evaluated；
By the file in described payment item data bag according to being used for the classification of the items evaluated and tested, and same category of file is deposited to category file and be used in the data storing directory corresponding to the project evaluated and tested；
Determine the evaluation and test project that user selects, and call the file deposited in the evaluating tool corresponding with this evaluation and test project and corresponding data storing directory；
Utilize this evaluating tool that the file deposited in this data storing directory is evaluated and tested, obtain evaluation result, and this evaluation result is exported.
2. method according to claim 1, it is characterized in that, the file deposited in described data storing directory includes IP kernel data file, for the constraint information file of each evaluation and test project and/or the configuration information file to the evaluating tool that each evaluation and test project uses.
3. method according to claim 2, it is characterised in that described utilize this evaluating tool that the file deposited in this data storing directory is evaluated and tested, including:
According to the constraint information file deposited in this data storing directory, the constraint information that evaluation and test is required is configured；
According to the configuration information file deposited in this data storing directory, this evaluating tool is configured；
According to the constraint information configured, utilize the evaluating tool configured that the IP kernel data file deposited in this data storing directory is evaluated and tested.
4. method according to claim 1, it is characterised in that also include:
Check whether described payment item data bag comprises the file needed for each evaluation and test project, and inspection result is fed back to user；
Wherein, described inspection result includes lacking required file in described payment item data bag evaluation and test project and the required file that this evaluation and test project lacks.
5. method according to claim 1, it is characterised in that also include:
To all store to evaluation result data base for the evaluation result obtained after the evaluation and test of each evaluation and test project, generate the report of IP kernel quality assessment.
6. an IP kernel quality automatic evaluation system, it is characterised in that including:
Receiver module, for receiving the payment item data bag of IP kernel to be evaluated；
Management module, for by the file in described payment item data bag according to being used for the classification of the items evaluated and tested, and same category of file is deposited to category file and is used in the data storing directory corresponding to the project evaluated and tested；
Calling module, for determining the evaluation and test project that user selects, and calls the file deposited in the evaluating tool corresponding with this evaluation and test project and corresponding data storing directory；
Evaluation and test module, for utilizing this evaluating tool that the file deposited in this data storing directory is evaluated and tested, obtains evaluation result, and is exported by this evaluation result.
7. system according to claim 6, it is characterised in that described calling module calls described evaluating tool by evaluating tool interface module.
8. system according to claim 6, it is characterised in that the output of described evaluation result is operated interface to Graphic User by described evaluation and test module.
9. system according to claim 6, it is characterized in that, the file deposited in described data storing directory includes IP kernel data file, for the constraint information file of each evaluation and test project and/or the configuration information file to the evaluating tool that each evaluation and test project uses.
10. system according to claim 9, it is characterised in that described evaluation and test module includes:
First dispensing unit, for according to the constraint information file deposited in this data storing directory, configuring the constraint information that evaluation and test is required；
Second dispensing unit, for according to the configuration information file deposited in this data storing directory, configuring this evaluating tool；
Evaluation and test unit, for according to the constraint information configured, utilizing the evaluating tool configured that the IP kernel data file deposited in this data storing directory is evaluated and tested.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510713874.6A CN105718367A (en) | 2015-10-28 | 2015-10-28 | Method and system for automatically evaluating quality of IP core |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510713874.6A CN105718367A (en) | 2015-10-28 | 2015-10-28 | Method and system for automatically evaluating quality of IP core |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN105718367A true CN105718367A (en) | 2016-06-29 |
Family
ID=56144993
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510713874.6A Pending CN105718367A (en) | 2015-10-28 | 2015-10-28 | Method and system for automatically evaluating quality of IP core |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN105718367A (en) |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106844126A (en) * | 2016-12-23 | 2017-06-13 | 中国空间技术研究院 | A kind of spacecraft hard IP kernel function of numeral and performance evaluation methodology |
| CN107300666A (en) * | 2017-06-15 | 2017-10-27 | 西安微电子技术研究所 | The test of embedded IP stone accesses isolation structure on a kind of SOC pieces |
| WO2022042397A1 (en) * | 2020-08-25 | 2022-03-03 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Method and device for logic synthesis, and storage medium |
Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101763453A (en) * | 2010-01-22 | 2010-06-30 | 工业和信息化部软件与集成电路促进中心 | Standardized IP core evaluating method and system |
-
2015
- 2015-10-28 CN CN201510713874.6A patent/CN105718367A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101763453A (en) * | 2010-01-22 | 2010-06-30 | 工业和信息化部软件与集成电路促进中心 | Standardized IP core evaluating method and system |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| 张溯: "集成电路工程学及IP评测技术的研究", 《中国优秀博硕士学位论文全文数据库 (博士)信息科技辑》 * |
| 肖羽祥等: "IP的质量与可靠性评估", 《质量工程卷》 * |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106844126A (en) * | 2016-12-23 | 2017-06-13 | 中国空间技术研究院 | A kind of spacecraft hard IP kernel function of numeral and performance evaluation methodology |
| CN106844126B (en) * | 2016-12-23 | 2019-03-22 | 中国空间技术研究院 | A kind of the spacecraft hard IP kernel function of number and performance evaluation methodology |
| CN107300666A (en) * | 2017-06-15 | 2017-10-27 | 西安微电子技术研究所 | The test of embedded IP stone accesses isolation structure on a kind of SOC pieces |
| WO2022042397A1 (en) * | 2020-08-25 | 2022-03-03 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Method and device for logic synthesis, and storage medium |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN109933522B (en) | Test method, test system and storage medium for automatic case | |
| US9262736B2 (en) | System and method for efficient creation and reconciliation of macro and micro level test plans | |
| US8689188B2 (en) | System and method for analyzing alternatives in test plans | |
| US8196113B2 (en) | Realtime creation of datasets in model based testing | |
| CN102236672B (en) | A kind of data lead-in method and device | |
| US20080295064A1 (en) | Rapid development of distributed web service | |
| EP2159744A1 (en) | Functional extensions for business objects | |
| US9348734B2 (en) | Generation of automated tests for business software solution packages | |
| CN114546738B (en) | Universal test method, system, terminal and storage medium for server | |
| CN105718367A (en) | Method and system for automatically evaluating quality of IP core | |
| CN111190814B (en) | Method and device for generating software test case, storage medium and terminal | |
| Heinrich et al. | Defining the quality of business processes | |
| CN111858698A (en) | Data checking method, data checking device and terminal equipment | |
| EP2913757A1 (en) | Method, system, and computer software product for test automation | |
| US20090241075A1 (en) | Test chip validation and development system | |
| CN112016256A (en) | Integrated circuit development platform, method, storage medium and equipment | |
| Narang et al. | Comparative analysis of component based software engineering metrics | |
| CN110209571A (en) | Test method and device, storage medium, the computer equipment of more new interface | |
| CN102043708A (en) | Erp software test system | |
| CN107766231A (en) | A kind of automated testing method and device | |
| CN109815129A (en) | Test method, device, terminal and the storage medium of securities finance application software | |
| CN105159623A (en) | Data processing method and device for storage management system | |
| US8812350B2 (en) | Service evolution approach in SOA | |
| do Carmo Machado et al. | Towards an integration testing approach for software product lines | |
| Sharma et al. | Quality assurance of component based software systems |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20160629 |