CN105682105A - Planned site evaluation method and device - Google Patents

Planned site evaluation method and device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN105682105A
CN105682105A CN201610147377.9A CN201610147377A CN105682105A CN 105682105 A CN105682105 A CN 105682105A CN 201610147377 A CN201610147377 A CN 201610147377A CN 105682105 A CN105682105 A CN 105682105A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
base station
planning
priority
list
station
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201610147377.9A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN105682105B (en
Inventor
陆昕
曹晓冬
杨杉
曹振
苏飞
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
China United Network Communications Group Co Ltd
Original Assignee
China United Network Communications Group Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by China United Network Communications Group Co Ltd filed Critical China United Network Communications Group Co Ltd
Priority to CN201610147377.9A priority Critical patent/CN105682105B/en
Publication of CN105682105A publication Critical patent/CN105682105A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN105682105B publication Critical patent/CN105682105B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W16/00—Network planning, e.g. coverage or traffic planning tools; Network deployment, e.g. resource partitioning or cells structures
    • H04W16/18—Network planning tools
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W24/00—Supervisory, monitoring or testing arrangements
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W24/00—Supervisory, monitoring or testing arrangements
    • H04W24/10—Scheduling measurement reports ; Arrangements for measurement reports

Abstract

An embodiment of the invention provides a planned site evaluation method and a planned site evaluation device, which relate to the technical field of communication, and evaluate the importance of planned base stations quickly and comprehensively. The planned site evaluation method comprises the steps of: acquiring a planned base station list in a region to be evaluated from a preconfigured site importance configuration information base according to index information of the region to be evaluated; acquiring a site importance configuration table; calculating a score of each planned base station in the planned base station list under each evaluation factor according to at least one evaluation factor configured in the site importance configuration table; acquiring comprehensive scoring parameters corresponding to each planned base station according to the score of each planned base station under each evaluation factor; and ranking the comprehensive scoring parameters corresponding to each planned base station, and determining an importance ranking of the planned base stations in the region to be evaluated. The planned site evaluation method and the planned site evaluation device are used for evaluating importance of the sites.

Description

A kind of method and apparatus planning website evaluation
Technical field
The present invention relates to communication technical field, particularly relate to a kind of method and apparatus planning website evaluation.
Background technology
Telecom operators are when carrying out wireless network planning, it usually needs newly-increased website is carried out importance assessment, planning personnel determine the priority of web construction according to assessment result, thus helping planning personnel's reasonable distribution to build a station the engineering phase. Importance assessment content generally includes: the factors such as newly-increased website periphery portfolio, existing network site density, purpose of building a station, user's perception, website investment and income.
Currently, the assessment of website importance is based primarily upon limited existing network data by planning personnel, namely limited data are gathered (such as, complaint, drive test and a small amount of wireless MR data), and by means of data processing tools (as, Excel) simply collecting, website importance is estimated by the existing network website situation grasped in conjunction with planning personnel. On the one hand, it does not have unified big data platform removes Real-time Collection, collects the existing network data of full dose; On the other hand, planning personnel lacks unified index and goes to describe these data, more lacks complete flow process and goes to weigh website importance. Sometimes existing network data is excessively outmoded, it is impossible to up-to-date state of the current network is done comprehensive assessment. Planning personnel is for the assessment of newly-increased website according to also tending to based on experience, and evaluation process is loaded down with trivial details, and workload is big and assessment result lacks objectivity.
Summary of the invention
Embodiments of the invention provide a kind of method and apparatus planning website evaluation, in order to the importance of assessment planning base station quick, comprehensive.
For reaching above-mentioned purpose, embodiments of the invention adopt the following technical scheme that
First aspect, embodiments provides a kind of method planning website evaluation, including:
Index information according to region to be assessed obtains the planning station list in described region to be assessed from the website importance configuration information storehouse being pre-configured with; Wherein, the index information in described region to be assessed at least includes the regional code in region to be assessed, item id and network formats; Multiple base stations that item id that regional code that the described website importance configuration information storehouse being pre-configured with comprises at least one region to be assessed is corresponding with described regional code is corresponding with described item id, mark that each base station is corresponding and network formats;Described planning station list at least includes the mark of each planning base station and the essential information of correspondence;
Obtain website importance allocation list; Described website importance allocation list is configured with at least one assessment factor, the corresponding allocation list of each described assessment factor;
According at least one assessment factor of configuration in described website importance allocation list, calculate the score value that in described planning station list, each described planning base station is corresponding under each assessment factor;
According to the score value that each described planning base station is corresponding under each assessment factor, obtain the comprehensive grading parameters that each described planning base station is corresponding;
Comprehensive grading parameters corresponding for described each described planning base station is ranked up, it is determined that the importance ranking of each described planning base station in described region to be assessed.
Second aspect, the embodiment of the present invention additionally provides a kind of device planning website evaluation, including:
Screening unit, is used for the index information according to region to be assessed from the website importance configuration information storehouse being pre-configured with, obtains the planning station list in described region to be assessed; Wherein, the index information in described region to be assessed at least includes the regional code in region to be assessed, item id and network formats; Multiple base stations that item id that regional code that the described website importance configuration information storehouse being pre-configured with comprises at least one region to be assessed is corresponding with described regional code is corresponding with described item id, mark that each base station is corresponding and network formats; Described planning station list at least includes the mark of each planning base station and the essential information of correspondence;
First acquiring unit, is used for obtaining website importance allocation list; Described website importance allocation list is configured with at least one assessment factor, the corresponding allocation list of each described assessment factor;
Computing unit, for according at least one assessment factor of configuration in described website importance allocation list, calculating the score value that in described planning station list, each described planning base station is corresponding under each assessment factor;
Second acquisition unit, for the score value corresponding under each assessment factor according to each described planning base station, obtains the comprehensive grading parameters that each described planning base station is corresponding;
Determine unit, for being ranked up by comprehensive grading parameters corresponding for described each described planning base station, it is determined that the importance ranking of each described planning base station in described region to be assessed.
The embodiment of the present invention provides a kind of method planning website evaluation, from the website importance configuration information storehouse being pre-configured with, the planning station list in described region to be assessed is obtained by the index information according to region to be assessed, and website importance allocation list is associated with the planning station list in described region to be assessed, thereby through at least one assessment factor pre-set, calculate the score value that in described planning station list, each described planning base station is corresponding under each assessment factor, and according to described score value, the described importance to the planning base station in area to be planned is carried out ranking, obtain the importance ranking of each planning base station, thus helping planning personnel's reasonable distribution to build a station the engineering phase. use this method to carry out the importance assessment of planning base station, while importance evaluation work amount is substantially improved, also reduce the subjective factors interference to assessment result.
Accompanying drawing explanation
In order to be illustrated more clearly that the technical scheme of the embodiment of the present invention, the accompanying drawing used required in embodiment or description of the prior art will be briefly described below, apparently, accompanying drawing in the following describes is only some embodiments of the present invention, for those of ordinary skill in the art, under the premise not paying creative work, it is also possible to obtain other accompanying drawing according to these accompanying drawings.
A kind of schematic flow sheet planning website evaluation method that Fig. 1 provides for the embodiment of the present invention;
A kind of structural representation planning website evaluation device that Fig. 2 provides for the embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed description of the invention
Below in conjunction with the accompanying drawing in the embodiment of the present invention, the technical scheme in the embodiment of the present invention is clearly and completely described, it is clear that described embodiment is only a part of embodiment of the present invention, rather than whole embodiments. Based on the embodiment in the present invention, the every other embodiment that those of ordinary skill in the art obtain under not making creative work premise, broadly fall into the scope of protection of the invention.
Wherein, communication system network standard is not defined by the embodiment of the present invention, such as, can be that the technical scheme that the embodiment of the present invention provides can apply to various cordless communication network, such as: global mobile communication (globalsystemformobilecommunication, referred to as GSM) system, CDMA (codedivisionmultipleaccess, referred to as CDMA) system, WCDMA (widebandcodedivisionmultipleaccess, referred to as WCDMA) system, universal mobile communications (universalmobiletelecommunicationsystem, referred to as UMTS) system, GPRS (general packet radio service) (generalpacketradioservice, referred to as GPRS) system, Long Term Evolution (longtermevolution, referred to as LTE) system, advanced Long Term Evolution (longtermevolutionadvanced, referred to as LTE-A) system, global interconnection inserting of microwave (worldwideinteroperabilityformicrowaveaccess, referred to as WiMAX) system etc. term " network " and " system " can be replaced mutually. term "and/or" in the embodiment of the present invention, is only a kind of incidence relation describing affiliated partner, and expression can exist three kinds of relations, for instance, A and/or B, it is possible to represent: individualism A, there is A and B, individualism B these three situation simultaneously. it addition, character "/" in the embodiment of the present invention, typically represent the forward-backward correlation relation to liking a kind of "or".
As it is shown in figure 1, the embodiment of the present invention provides a kind of method planning website evaluation, including:
S101, index information according to region to be assessed obtain the planning station list in described region to be assessed from the website importance configuration information storehouse being pre-configured with;
Wherein, the index information in described region to be assessed at least includes the regional code in region to be assessed, item id and network formats; Multiple base stations that item id that regional code that the described website importance configuration information storehouse being pre-configured with comprises at least one region to be assessed is corresponding with described regional code is corresponding with described item id, mark that each base station is corresponding and network formats; Described planning station list at least includes the mark of each planning base station and the essential information of correspondence; Wherein, described essential information at least includes the network formats of the grid value of each described planning base station, target source, area grade, construction cost, investment situation, each planning base station.
S102, acquisition website importance allocation list; Described website importance allocation list is configured with at least one assessment factor, the corresponding allocation list of each described assessment factor;
S103, according at least one assessment factor of configuration in described website importance allocation list, calculate the score value that each described planning base station in described planning station list is corresponding under each assessment factor;
S104, according to each described planning base station score value corresponding under each assessment factor, obtain the comprehensive grading parameters that each described planning base station is corresponding;
S105, comprehensive grading parameters corresponding for described each described planning base station is ranked up, it is determined that the importance ranking of each described planning base station in described region to be assessed.
The embodiment of the present invention provides a kind of method planning website evaluation, from the website importance configuration information storehouse being pre-configured with, the planning station list in described region to be assessed is obtained by the index information according to region to be assessed, and website importance allocation list is associated with the planning station list in described region to be assessed, thereby through at least one assessment factor pre-set, calculate the score value that in described planning station list, each described planning base station is corresponding under each assessment factor, and according to described score value, the described importance to the planning base station in area to be planned is carried out ranking, obtain the importance ranking of each planning base station, thus helping planning personnel's reasonable distribution to build a station the engineering phase. use this method to carry out the importance assessment of planning base station, while importance evaluation work amount is substantially improved, also reduce the subjective factors interference to assessment result.
The one planning website evaluation method that the embodiment of the present invention provides, it is possible to planning that website evaluation device performs by one, described planning website evaluation device can be Bus stop planning platform.
Wherein, described Bus stop planning platform may refer to big data analysis and supports platform, what may also mean that other are configured with that the embodiment of the present invention provides a kind of plans the platform of configuration information needed for website evaluation method, the concrete structure that described big data analysis is supported platform by the embodiment of the present invention is not defined, described Bus stop planning platform should at least include the project configuration module required for the embodiment of the present invention, website importance ranking module, described project configuration module is used for configuring described website importance configuration information storehouse, described website importance ranking module is for the priority of each assessment factor in configuration site importance allocation list, and the priority of sub-factor corresponding to each assessment factor, and generate website importance allocation list and allocation list corresponding to each assessment factor. Bus stop planning platform in the embodiment of the present invention can be the big data analysis of CHINAUNICOM and scheme support platform, and the method that inventive embodiments provides is based on the auxiliary programming under described platform, scale of investment adjusting module.
Before step S101, described method also includes:
S106, at the input page of Bus stop planning platform, receive the first operational order of user's input, described first operational order includes the index information of an area to be planned, and the index information of one area to be planned at least includes the regional code in region to be assessed, item id and network formats.
Wherein, the concrete form of the regional code in described region to be assessed is not defined by the embodiment of the present invention, for instance, it is possible to it is the regional code of user preset, it is also possible to be the regional code specified according to unification of the motherland, for instance, 104 can represent XX economizes; 10401 can represent the XX YY districts and cities saved; 10401001 can represent a region under YY districts and cities.
Wherein, this regional code can be provinces and cities' coding, districts and cities' coding, can also be the regional code in districts and cities, this is not defined by the embodiment of the present invention, if described regional code can be set to provinces and cities' coding by the website importance wanting one provinces and cities of assessment, such as 104, if described regional code can be set to districts and cities' coding by the website importance wanting one districts and cities of assessment, the like, the embodiment of the present invention does not repeat at this, preferably, the regional code in the embodiment of the present invention refers to that districts and cities encode.
Wherein, the concrete form of project label number ID is not defined by the present invention, it is possible to be determined according to the item id in the website importance configuration information storehouse being pre-configured with, as long as a project can uniquely be identified.
Wherein, network formats can be configured as required, for instance, it is possible to it is GSM network, WCDMA network, FDD-LTE network, TDD-LTE network etc.
Wherein, the configuration of described Bus stop planning platform is not defined by the embodiment of the present invention, exemplary, it is possible to be implemented by following steps:
1, receive the configuration parameter of user's input, described configuration parameter includes the essential information at least one region to be assessed, wherein, the essential information in one region to be assessed includes regional code, the corresponding multiple item ids of each regional code, each item id include at least one planning base station and with multiple existing network base stations less than predeterminable range of the spacing of each described planning base station, the network formats corresponding with each planning base station, predeterminable range, the base station work ginseng of each planning base station and existing network base station, each existing network base station correspondence wireless data, core network data and user's communication voice, data are single in detail, the time started of statistical indicator, the unit price of speech business every day and data, complain the complaint number of times that gets of platform and work order number, work ginseng in described base station at least includes the geographical position of each base station, for instance, longitude and latitude.
Wherein, described predeterminable range for filtering out the target BS group less than or equal to predeterminable range of the spacing with each planning base station from multiple existing network base stations, and described target BS group includes the spacing existing network base station less than or equal to predeterminable range that is one or more and that plan base station. the corresponding one group of satisfactory target BS group in each planning base station, the corresponding aggregative indicator of each target BS group, on the one hand, can according to the aggregative indicator often organizing target BS group, determine the often group target BS group impact on corresponding planning base station, thus determine the importance of each planning base station according to default assessment factor, wherein, the aggregative indicator of one target BS group refers to the data business volume of all existing network base stations in described target BS group, user's perception is marked, voice services volume, site density, grid is worth, high flow capacity number of users, high ranked user number and high ARPU number of users. on the other hand, can according to the aggregative indicator of target BS group corresponding to each planning base station, determine and the planning base station in area to be planned is screened, such as, if the average daily data service figureofmerit of the target BS group that any one planning base station is corresponding is be more than or equal to default average daily portfolio, then may determine that described planning base station is significant base stations.
2, complete the configuration to Bus stop planning platform according to described configuration parameter, obtain the website importance configuration information storehouse being pre-configured with;
3, receiving the second operational order of user's input, described second operational order is for configuring the priority of each assessment factor prestored in described Bus stop planning platform and the weighted value that each priority is corresponding;
Wherein, assessment factor can be the one or more factors being stored in advance in Bus stop planning platform, user can select as required, assessment factor can also be increased as needed in the configuration module of Bus stop planning platform and delete assessment factor, needing the priority of the assessment factor of configuration increase and corresponding weights when increasing assessment factor, the mode how increasing assessment factor in Bus stop planning platform is not defined by the embodiment of the present invention.
4, according to described second operational order, configure the priority of each assessment factor prestored in described Bus stop planning platform, obtain website importance allocation list, wherein, the weighted value of the assessment factor that weighted value that described website importance allocation list medium priority is high assessment factor is corresponding is low more than priority.
Wherein, described website importance allocation list at least includes target source, planning scene, area grade, structure risk and construction cost, wherein, target source is corresponding with the allocation list in target source, plans scene and plans that the allocation list of scene is corresponding, area grade is corresponding with the allocation list of area grade, structure risk allocation list counter structure risk and construction cost allocation list.
The concrete form of described website importance allocation list is not defined by the embodiment of the present invention, for instance, it is possible to it is the form of form.
Wherein, the assessment factor in the embodiment of the present invention can be arranged and name as needed in Bus stop planning platform voluntarily by user. Exemplary, described assessment factor at least includes two, and wherein, each assessment factor is a corresponding priority respectively, the weighted value that different priority is corresponding different, the weighted value of the assessment factor that weighted value that assessment factor that priority is high is corresponding is low more than priority;
Accordingly, can implement in the following manner for step S104;
S1041, basisDetermine the comprehensive grading parameters that each described planning base station is corresponding; Wherein, Q is the comprehensive grading parameters that a planning base station is corresponding, xiIt is a planning base station score value under i-th assessment factor, λiFor the weighted value that i-th assessment factor is corresponding; N >=2.
It should be noted that, in the embodiment of the present invention, the priority of each assessment factor can be carried out by user being arrange as required, during the score value that each described planning base station is corresponding under each assessment factor in calculating described planning station list, calculating can be sequentially carried out, it is also possible to do not calculate, according to the priority orders arranged, the score value that each described planning base station is corresponding under each assessment factor according to each assessment priority of user setup order from high to low.
Exemplary, described at least one assessment factor of pre-setting include the combination of following any one or more assessment factor:
Target source factors, area grade factor, planning scene factor, structure risk factor and construction cost factor.
Further, however, it is determined that described assessment factor is target source factors, calculate the score value that in described planning station list, each described planning base station is corresponding under described target source factors, including:
S1031A, slave site planning platform obtain the allocation list in target source corresponding to described planning station list; Wherein, including at least a sub-goal source in the allocation list in described target source, each described sub-goal source is a corresponding priority respectively, the score value that different priority is corresponding different, the score value that sub-goal source that score value corresponding to sub-goal source that priority is high is low more than priority is corresponding, the score value difference preset multiple between adjacent priority;
Wherein, the particular content that described each sub-goal is originated by the embodiment of the present invention is not defined, such as, can be brand building, market development, perception promote, basis covering power promote in any one, described target source is the combination in above-mentioned described any one sub-goal source or multiple sub-goal source, it is of course also possible to there is more sub-goal factor, wherein, the priority that each sub-goal source is corresponding can be configured in target originates allocation list by user.
Wherein, described preset multiple is not defined by the embodiment of the present invention, for instance, it is preferred that described preset multiple can be ten times.
Exemplary, if brand building, market development, perception promotes, basis covering power promotes priority reduce successively, it is possible to by brand building, market development, perception promotes, basis covering power promotes score value, to set gradually be 1000,100,10,1.
S1032A, the allocation list configuration originated according to described target the priority in sub-goal source, it is determined that each described planning base station score value under each described sub-goal is originated;
S1033A, by each described planning base station each described sub-goal originate under score value summation, obtain the target score of each described planning base station; Wherein, each target score comprises at least one digit order number;
Wherein, exemplary, by above-mentioned it is recognised that for any one planning base station, its score value under each described sub-goal is originated is followed successively by 1000,100,10,1, then the target score of described planning base station is 1101.
S1034A, by the figure place of digit order number corresponding for the target score of each described planning base station, it is determined that for the score value that each described planning base station is corresponding under target source factors.
As it has been described above, the target score of planning base station is 1101, then the score value that described planning base station is corresponding under target source factors is 4.
If it is determined that described assessment factor is planning scene factor, plan that base station, described first planning base station are any one planning base station in described planning station list for first;
Accordingly, calculate the score value that the first planning base station described in described planning station list is corresponding under described planning scene factor, including:
S1031B, slave site planning platform obtain the allocation list of planning scene corresponding to described planning station list; Wherein, the allocation list of described planning scene includes at least a subplan scene, each described subplan scene is a corresponding priority respectively, the score value that different priority is corresponding different, the score value that subplan scene that score value corresponding to subplan scene that priority is high is low more than priority is corresponding;
Wherein, described subplan scene is not specifically defined by the embodiment of the present invention, for instance can be urban district, county town, high ferro, motor-car, 3A/4A/5A level scenic spot, one/bis-/tri-class campuses, A/B/C class small towns.
S1032B if it is determined that described first planning scene belonging to base station exists corresponding subplan scene in the allocation list of described planning scene, then obtains the subplan scene that described first planning base station is corresponding;
S1033B, plan, according to described first, the priority that subplan scene corresponding to base station is corresponding, it is determined that the score value that described first planning base station is corresponding under planning scene.
It is preferred that, the allocation list of described planning scene also includes other scenes, the priority of other scenes described is less than the priority of any one subplan scene in the allocation list of described planning scene, user can be configured as required, as long as the priority of other scenes is less than the priority of any one subplan scene in the allocation list of described planning scene described in ensureing.
S1034B is if it is determined that described first planning scene belonging to base station is absent from corresponding subplan scene in the allocation list of described planning scene, it is determined that scene corresponding to described first planning base station is other scenes;
S1035B, according to the described first priority planning other scenes corresponding to base station, it is determined that the score value that described first planning base station is corresponding under planning scene.
Further alternative, described planning station list also includes the information of existing network base station, being configured with the base station dimension index result table that each described planning base station is corresponding in described Bus stop planning platform, described base station dimension index result table includes the grid of grid belonging to each described planning base station and is worth;Wherein, each described planning base station belongs to a grid, and the corresponding grid of each grid is worth;
Accordingly, calculate the score value that in described planning station list, each described planning base station is corresponding under area grade, including:
S1031C, slave site planning platform obtain the allocation list of area grade corresponding to described planning station list, the allocation list of described area grade comprises the grid being pre-configured with and is worth linear ordering gear;
S1032C, mark according to described planning base station each in described planning station list determine the grid belonging to each described planning base station;
S1033C, according to formula Wfinish=((I-Imin)*(W-1)/(Imax-Imin))+1 each described planning base station of calculating gear belonging in the allocation list of described area grade; Wherein, WfinishFor the gear that planning base station is corresponding, W is that the grid being pre-configured with is worth linear ordering gear number; I is that the grid belonging to each planning base station is worth; ImaxGrid maximum in being worth for the grid that grids all in region to be assessed are corresponding is worth; IminGrid minimum in being worth for the grid that grids all in region to be assessed are corresponding is worth
S1034C, by described each described planning base station in the allocation list of described area grade belonging to gear, it is determined that for the score value that each described planning base station is corresponding under area grade.
Exemplary, if a grid Maximum Value value is 1,000,000, it is 100,000 that grid is worth minima, and the grid being pre-configured with is worth linear ordering gear number and is divided into 10 grades, is 300,000 when the grid of a certain planning base station is worth, then the gear that described planning base station falls into is:
Floor ((30 10) * (10-1)/(100 10))+1=3, then the score value of described planning base station is 3.
Wherein, grid is worth and can pass through the voice of existing network base station, data list in detail in each grid being arranged in Bus stop planning platform, bill, set meal storehouse, work is joined, after obtaining net lattice control income, terminal average price score and high-grade terminal accounting, obtain according to index weightings such as net lattice control income, terminal average price score and high-grade terminal accountings;
Wherein it is possible to single in detail according to the voice of existing network base station, data in grid, bill, set meal storehouse, work ginseng calculates the income of each community in grid, by the income of all communities with divided by grid area, obtains net lattice control income;
Wherein, it is single in detail that terminal average price score can pass through voice, data, TAC storehouse, work ginseng, calculates the terminal average price average of all communities in grid, obtains terminal average price
Wherein, it is single in detail that high-grade terminal accounting score can pass through voice, data, TAC storehouse, and work is joined, and calculates the high-grade terminal accounting average of all communities in grid, obtains high-grade terminal accounting.
Z-SCORE (Z model) algorithm can be passed through and obtain net lattice control income, high-grade terminal accounting score and terminal average price score. Z-SCORE algorithm, for calculating a group interior (the whole province), the mean μ of all data and standard deviation δ, obtains indices scoring.
Further alternative, can also according to the existing network base station parameter in the predeterminable range of each planning base station, calculate the structure risk of each planning base station, for the structure risk factor of planning base station is estimated, exemplary, described base station dimension index result table also includes the site density value that each planning base station is corresponding;
Plan that base station, described second planning base station are any one planning base station in described planning station list for second;
Accordingly, calculate the score value that the second planning base station described in described planning station list is corresponding under structure risk, including:
S1031D, by described in described planning station list second planning base station be associated with the allocation list of the structure risk in Bus stop planning platform;The allocation list of described structure risk comprises default rational density value range, default excessive risk early warning value and default risk rising step-length;
S1032D if it is determined that in described planning station list exist second planning base station be designated micro-base station, then by described second plan base station priority be set to the first priority; Described second planning base station is any one planning base station in described planning station list;
S1033D if it is determined that the mark that there is the 3rd planning base station in described planning station list is not micro-base station, then obtains the site density value that described 3rd planning base station is corresponding from the dimension index result table of described base station;
S104D, plan that by the described 3rd the allocation list of site density value corresponding to base station and described structure risk compares, obtain comparative result;
S1035D, according to described comparative result, be respectively provided with priority for described planning base station each in described planning station list;
S1036D, priority according to each described planning base station, give a score value for each described planning base station respectively so that score value corresponding to the high planning base station of priority is high, and score value corresponding to planning base station that priority is low is low; Obtain the score value that each described planning base station is corresponding under structure risk.
Wherein, the site density that described planning base station is corresponding can obtain in the following manner:
1, with any one planning base station A for the center of circle, draw circle with predeterminable range for radius, obtain and all existing network base stations less than or equal to predeterminable range of the spacing of described planning base station A and every other planning base station; Wherein, the predeterminable range of the embodiment of the present invention can be one kilometer;
2, all existing network number of base stations screened and every other planning base station number are added, namely obtain the site density of planning base station A.
Further alternative, owing to according to described comparative result, the mode arranging priority for described planning base station each in described planning station list is all identical, for the 4th, the embodiment of the present invention only plans that base station illustrates, do not have any indicative implication:
Accordingly, step S1035D can realize especially by following steps:
By the described 4th, S1035D1 if it is determined that X≤D, then plans that the priority of base station is set to the first priority;
By the described 4th, S1035D2 if it is determined that D < X≤A, then plans that the priority of base station is set to X/S;
By the described 4th, S1035D3 if it is determined that A < X, then plans that the priority of base station is set to ((A-D)/S)+(X-A); Wherein, D is that the allocation list of described structure risk comprises default rational density value range; X is the site density value that described 5th planning base station is corresponding; A is default excessive risk early warning value; S is default risk rising step-length.
Further alternative, it is also possible to the construction cost according to each planning base station, calculate the construction cost assessment factor of each planning base station, exemplary, calculate the score value that in described planning station list, each described planning base station is corresponding under construction cost, including:
Described construction cost allocation list is:
A, according to formula Paverage=Pcost/ M calculates the construction cost of each described planning base station;
B, construction cost according to the assignment rule of default setting and described each described planning base station, corresponding score value is given to each described planning base station, wherein, the assignment rule of described default setting is the corresponding score value of construction cost, the corresponding score value that corresponding score value that construction cost is high is low less than construction cost;Wherein, PaverageFor construction cost, for positive integer, PcostFor planning the total investment of base station, the total investment of a planning base station at least includes the main equipment investment of a planning base station, antenna feeder investment engineering cost and other expenses, complete sets of basic equipment investment and electric generation investment; M is the difference granularity of configuration.
It should be noted that the weighted value of embodiment of the present invention medium priority correspondence from high to low is followed successively by 10-12,10-9,10-6,10-3,10-0.
As shown in Figure 2, the embodiment of the present invention also provides for a kind of device planning website evaluation, each functional unit in the device of this planning website evaluation is corresponding with the method planning website evaluation in the above embodiment of the present invention, specifically being referred to the description of the above embodiment of the present invention, the embodiment of the present invention does not repeat them here. As in figure 2 it is shown, the device 20 of this planning website evaluation, including:
Screening unit 201, is used for the index information according to region to be assessed from the website importance configuration information storehouse being pre-configured with, obtains the planning station list in described region to be assessed; Wherein, the index information in described region to be assessed at least includes the regional code in region to be assessed, item id and network formats; Multiple base stations that item id that regional code that the described website importance configuration information storehouse being pre-configured with comprises at least one region to be assessed is corresponding with described regional code is corresponding with described item id, mark that each base station is corresponding and network formats; Described planning station list at least includes the mark of each planning base station and the essential information of correspondence;
First acquiring unit 202, is used for obtaining website importance allocation list; Described website importance allocation list is configured with at least one assessment factor, the corresponding allocation list of each described assessment factor;
Computing unit 203, for according at least one assessment factor of configuration in described website importance allocation list, calculating the score value that in described planning station list, each described planning base station is corresponding under each assessment factor;
Second acquisition unit 204, for the score value corresponding under each assessment factor according to each described planning base station, obtains the comprehensive grading parameters that each described planning base station is corresponding;
Determine unit 205, for being ranked up by comprehensive grading parameters corresponding for described each described planning base station, it is determined that the importance ranking of each described planning base station in described region to be assessed.
The embodiment of the present invention provides a kind of device planning website evaluation, from the website importance configuration information storehouse being pre-configured with, the planning station list in described region to be assessed is obtained by the index information according to region to be assessed, and website importance allocation list is associated with the planning station list in described region to be assessed, thereby through at least one assessment factor pre-set, calculate the score value that in described planning station list, each described planning base station is corresponding under each assessment factor, and according to described score value, the described importance to the planning base station in area to be planned is carried out ranking, obtain the importance ranking of each planning base station, thus helping planning personnel's reasonable distribution to build a station the engineering phase. use this method to carry out the importance assessment of planning base station, while importance evaluation work amount is substantially improved, also reduce the subjective factors interference to assessment result.
Further alternative, described website importance allocation list is configured with at least two assessment factor, wherein, each assessment factor is a corresponding priority respectively, the weighted value that different priority is corresponding different, the weighted value of the assessment factor that weighted value that assessment factor that priority is high is corresponding is low more than priority;
Accordingly, described second acquisition unit 204 specifically for:
According toDetermine the comprehensive grading parameters that each described planning base station is corresponding; Wherein, Q is the comprehensive grading parameters that a planning base station is corresponding, xiIt is a planning base station score value under i-th assessment factor, λiFor the weighted value that i-th assessment factor is corresponding; N >=2.
Further alternative, described at least one assessment factor of pre-setting include the combination of following any one or more assessment factor:
Target source factors, area grade factor, planning scene factor, structure risk factor and construction cost factor.
Further alternative, however, it is determined that described assessment factor is target source factors, described computing unit 203, including:
First acquisition module, for obtaining the allocation list in target source corresponding to described planning station list in slave site planning platform; Wherein, including at least a sub-goal source in the allocation list in described target source, each described sub-goal source is a corresponding priority respectively, the score value that different priority is corresponding different, the score value that sub-goal source that score value corresponding to sub-goal source that priority is high is low more than priority is corresponding, the score value difference preset multiple between adjacent priority;
First determines module, the priority that the sub-goal of the allocation list configuration for originating according to described target is originated, it is determined that each described planning base station score value under each described sub-goal is originated;
Computing module, for by each described planning base station each described sub-goal originate under score value summation, obtain the target score of each described planning base station; Wherein, each target score comprises at least one digit order number;
Second determines module, for by the figure place of digit order number corresponding for the target score of each described planning base station, it is determined that for the score value that each described planning base station is corresponding under target source factors.
Further alternative, however, it is determined that described assessment factor is planning scene factor, and described computing unit 203 also includes:
Second acquisition module, for obtaining the allocation list of planning scene corresponding to described planning station list in slave site planning platform; Wherein, the allocation list of described planning scene includes at least a subplan scene, each described subplan scene is a corresponding priority respectively, the score value that different priority is corresponding different, the score value that subplan scene that score value corresponding to subplan scene that priority is high is low more than priority is corresponding;
First judge module, for judging whether described first planning scene belonging to base station exists corresponding subplan scene in the allocation list of described planning scene;
3rd acquisition module, for when determining that the scene belonging to described first planning base station exists corresponding subplan scene in the allocation list of described planning scene, obtaining the subplan scene that described first planning base station is corresponding;
3rd determines module, for the priority that the subplan scene corresponding according to described first planning base station is corresponding, it is determined that the score value that described first planning base station is corresponding under planning scene.
Further alternative, described planning station list also includes the information of existing network base station, being configured with the base station dimension index result table that each described planning base station is corresponding in described Bus stop planning platform, described base station dimension index result table includes the grid of grid belonging to each described planning base station and is worth; Wherein, each described planning base station belongs to a grid, the corresponding grid Maximum Value value of each grid and minima;
Accordingly, described computing unit 203 also particularly useful for:
Slave site planning platform obtains the allocation list of area grade corresponding to described planning station list; The allocation list of described area grade comprises the grid being pre-configured with and is worth linear ordering gear;
According to formula Wfinish=((I-Imin)*(W-1)/(Imax-Imin))+1 each described planning base station of calculating gear belonging in the allocation list of described area grade; Wherein, WfinishPlanning, for described second, the gear that base station is corresponding, W is that the grid being pre-configured with is worth linear ordering gear; I is that grid is worth; ImaxFor grid Maximum Value value; IminIt is worth minima for grid;
The gear affiliated in the allocation list of described area grade by described each described planning base station, it is determined that for the score value that each described planning base station is corresponding under area grade.
Further alternative, described base station dimension index result table also includes the site density value corresponding to each grid;
Plan that base station, described second planning base station are any one planning base station in described planning station list for second;
Accordingly, described computing unit 203 also includes:
Relating module, for being associated the second planning base station described in described planning station list with the allocation list of the structure risk in Bus stop planning platform; The allocation list of described structure risk comprises default rational density value range, default excessive risk early warning value and default risk rising step-length;
Second judge module, is designated micro-base station for what judge whether to exist in described planning station list the second planning base station;
Unit is set, for described second judge module determine in described planning station list exist second planning base station be designated micro-base station, then by described second plan base station priority be set to the first priority; Described second planning base station is any one planning base station in described planning station list;
4th acquisition module, for determining that the mark that there is the 3rd planning base station in described planning station list is not micro-base station at described second judge module, then obtains the site density value that described 3rd planning base station is corresponding from the dimension index result table of described base station;
Comparison module, for being compared by the allocation list of site density value corresponding for described 3rd planning base station with described structure risk, obtains comparative result;
Configuration module, for according to described comparative result, being respectively provided with priority for described planning base station each in described planning station list;
5th acquisition module, for priority according to each described planning base station, gives a score value for each described planning base station respectively so that score value corresponding to the high planning base station of priority is high, and score value corresponding to planning base station that priority is low is low; Obtain the score value that each described planning base station is corresponding under structure risk.
Further alternative, for the 4th plan base station, accordingly, described configuration module specifically for:
If it is determined that X≤D, then plan that the priority of base station is set to the first priority by the described 4th;
If it is determined that D < X≤A, then plan that the priority of base station is set to X/S by the described 4th;
If it is determined that A < X, then plan that the priority of base station is set to ((A-D)/S)+(X-A) by the described 4th; Wherein, D is that the allocation list of described structure risk comprises default rational density value range; X is the site density value that described 5th planning base station is corresponding; A is default excessive risk early warning value; S is default risk rising step-length.
In several embodiments provided herein, it should be understood that disclosed system, apparatus and method, it is possible to realize by another way. Such as, device embodiment described above is merely schematic, such as, the division of described unit, being only a kind of logic function to divide, actual can have other dividing mode when realizing, for instance multiple unit or assembly can in conjunction with or be desirably integrated into another system, or some features can ignore, or do not perform. Another point, shown or discussed coupling each other or direct-coupling or communication connection can be through INDIRECT COUPLING or the communication connection of some interfaces, device or unit, it is possible to be electrical, or other form.
The described unit illustrated as separating component can be or may not be physically separate, and the parts shown as unit can be or may not be physical location, namely may be located at a place, or can also be distributed on multiple NE. Some or all of unit therein can be selected according to the actual needs to realize the purpose of the present embodiment scheme.
It addition, each functional unit in each embodiment of the present invention can be integrated in a processing unit, it is also possible to be that the independent physics of unit includes, it is also possible to two or more unit are integrated in a unit. Above-mentioned integrated unit both can adopt the form of hardware to realize, it would however also be possible to employ hardware adds the form of SFU software functional unit and realizes.
The above-mentioned integrated unit realized with the form of SFU software functional unit, it is possible to be stored in a computer read/write memory medium. Above-mentioned SFU software functional unit is stored in a storage medium, including some instructions with so that a computer equipment (can be personal computer, server, or the network equipment etc.) perform the part steps of method described in each embodiment of the present invention. And aforesaid storage medium includes: USB flash disk, portable hard drive, read only memory (Read-OnlyMemory, be called for short ROM), random access memory (RandomAccessMemory, be called for short RAM), the various media that can store program code such as magnetic disc or CD.
Last it is noted that above example is only in order to illustrate technical scheme, it is not intended to limit; Although the present invention being described in detail with reference to previous embodiment, it will be understood by those within the art that: the technical scheme described in foregoing embodiments still can be modified by it, or wherein portion of techniques feature is carried out equivalent replacement; And these amendments or replacement, do not make the essence of appropriate technical solution depart from the spirit and scope of various embodiments of the present invention technical scheme.

Claims (16)

1. the method planning website evaluation, it is characterised in that including:
Index information according to region to be assessed obtains the planning station list in described region to be assessed from the website importance configuration information storehouse being pre-configured with; Wherein, the index information in described region to be assessed at least includes the regional code in region to be assessed, item id and network formats; Multiple base stations that item id that regional code that the described website importance configuration information storehouse being pre-configured with comprises at least one region to be assessed is corresponding with described regional code is corresponding with described item id, mark that each base station is corresponding and network formats; Described planning station list at least includes the mark of each planning base station and the essential information of correspondence;
Obtain website importance allocation list; Described website importance allocation list is configured with at least one assessment factor, the corresponding allocation list of each described assessment factor;
According at least one assessment factor of configuration in described website importance allocation list, calculate the score value that in described planning station list, each described planning base station is corresponding under each assessment factor;
According to the score value that each described planning base station is corresponding under each assessment factor, obtain the comprehensive grading parameters that each described planning base station is corresponding;
Comprehensive grading parameters corresponding for described each described planning base station is ranked up, it is determined that the importance ranking of each described planning base station in described region to be assessed.
2. method according to claim 1, it is characterized in that, described website importance allocation list is configured with at least two assessment factor, wherein, each assessment factor is a corresponding priority respectively, the weighted value that different priority is corresponding different, the weighted value of the assessment factor that weighted value that assessment factor that priority is high is corresponding is low more than priority;
Accordingly, the described score value corresponding under each assessment factor according to each described planning base station, obtain the comprehensive grading parameters that each described planning base station is corresponding, including:
According toDetermine the comprehensive grading parameters that each described planning base station is corresponding; Wherein, Q is the comprehensive grading parameters that a planning base station is corresponding, xiIt is a planning base station score value under i-th assessment factor, λiFor the weighted value that i-th assessment factor is corresponding; N >=2.
3. method according to claim 1, it is characterised in that in described website importance allocation list, at least one assessment factor of configuration includes the combination of following any one or more assessment factor:
Target source factors, area grade factor, planning scene factor, structure risk factor and construction cost factor.
4. method according to claim 3, it is characterised in that if it is determined that described assessment factor is target source factors, calculates the score value that in described planning station list, each described planning base station is corresponding under described target source factors, including:
Slave site planning platform obtains the allocation list in target source corresponding to described planning station list; Wherein, including at least a sub-goal source in the allocation list in described target source, each described sub-goal source is a corresponding priority respectively, the score value that different priority is corresponding different, the score value that sub-goal source that score value corresponding to sub-goal source that priority is high is low more than priority is corresponding, the score value difference preset multiple between adjacent priority;
The priority in the sub-goal source of the allocation list configuration originated according to described target, it is determined that each described planning base station score value under each described sub-goal is originated;
By each described planning base station each described sub-goal originate under score value summation, obtain the target score of each described planning base station; Wherein, each target score comprises at least one digit order number;
Figure place by digit order number corresponding for the target score of each described planning base station, it is determined that for the score value that each described planning base station is corresponding under target source factors.
5. for first, method according to claim 3, it is characterised in that if it is determined that described assessment factor is planning scene factor, plans that base station, described first planning base station are any one planning base station in described planning station list;
Accordingly, calculate the score value that the first planning base station described in described planning station list is corresponding under described planning scene factor, including:
Slave site planning platform obtains the allocation list of planning scene corresponding to described planning station list;Wherein, the allocation list of described planning scene includes at least a subplan scene, each described subplan scene is a corresponding priority respectively, the score value that different priority is corresponding different, the score value that subplan scene that score value corresponding to subplan scene that priority is high is low more than priority is corresponding;
If it is determined that the scene that described first planning is belonging to base station exists corresponding subplan scene in the allocation list of described planning scene, then obtain the subplan scene that described first planning base station is corresponding;
According to the priority that the subplan scene that described first planning base station is corresponding is corresponding, it is determined that the score value that described first planning base station is corresponding under planning scene.
6. method according to claim 3, it is characterized in that, described planning station list also includes the information of existing network base station, being configured with the base station dimension index result table that each described planning base station is corresponding in described Bus stop planning platform, described base station dimension index result table includes the grid of grid belonging to each described planning base station and is worth; Wherein, each described planning base station belongs to a grid; The corresponding grid of each grid is worth;
Accordingly, calculate the score value that in described planning station list, each described planning base station is corresponding under area grade, including:
Slave site planning platform obtains the allocation list of area grade, the allocation list of described area grade comprises the grid being pre-configured with and is worth linear ordering gear;
Mark according to described planning base station each in described planning station list determines the grid belonging to each described planning base station;
According to formula Wfinish=((I-Imin)*(W-1)/(Imax-Imin))+1 each described planning base station of calculating gear belonging in the allocation list of described area grade; Wherein, WfinishFor the gear that planning base station is corresponding, W is that the grid being pre-configured with is worth linear ordering gear number; I is that the grid belonging to each planning base station is worth; ImaxGrid maximum in being worth for the grid that grids all in region to be assessed are corresponding is worth; IminGrid minimum in being worth for the grid that grids all in region to be assessed are corresponding is worth;
The gear affiliated in the allocation list of described area grade by described each described planning base station, it is determined that for the score value that each described planning base station is corresponding under area grade.
7. method according to claim 6, it is characterised in that described base station dimension index result table also includes the site density value that each planning base station is corresponding;
Plan that base station, described second planning base station are any one planning base station in described planning station list for second;
Accordingly, calculate the score value that the second planning base station described in described planning station list is corresponding under structure risk, including:
Second planning base station described in described planning station list is associated with the allocation list of the structure risk in Bus stop planning platform; The allocation list of described structure risk comprises default rational density value range, default excessive risk early warning value and default risk rising step-length;
If it is determined that in described planning station list exist second planning base station be designated micro-base station, then by described second plan base station priority be set to the first priority; Described second planning base station is any one planning base station in described planning station list;
If it is determined that the mark that there is the 3rd planning base station in described planning station list is not micro-base station, then from the dimension index result table of described base station, obtain the site density value that described 3rd planning base station is corresponding;
The allocation list of site density value corresponding for described 3rd planning base station with described structure risk is compared, obtains comparative result;
According to described comparative result, it is respectively provided with priority for described planning base station each in described planning station list;
Priority according to each described planning base station, gives a score value for each described planning base station respectively so that high score value corresponding to planning base station of priority is high, and score value corresponding to planning base station that priority is low is low; Obtain the score value that each described planning base station is corresponding under structure risk.
8. method according to claim 7, it is characterised in that plan base station for the 4th, accordingly, described according to described comparative result, for the 4th planning base station described in described planning station list, priority is set, including:
If it is determined that X≤D, then plan that the priority of base station is set to the first priority by the described 4th;
If it is determined that D < X≤A, then plan that the priority of base station is set to X/S by the described 4th;
If it is determined that A < X, then plan that the priority of base station is set to ((A-D)/S)+by the described 4th) X-A); Wherein, D is that the allocation list of described structure risk comprises default rational density value range; X is the site density value that described 5th planning base station is corresponding; A is default excessive risk early warning value; S is default risk rising step-length.
9. the device planning website evaluation, it is characterised in that including:
Screening unit, is used for the index information according to region to be assessed from the website importance configuration information storehouse being pre-configured with, obtains the planning station list in described region to be assessed; Wherein, the index information in described region to be assessed at least includes the regional code in region to be assessed, item id and network formats; Multiple base stations that item id that regional code that the described website importance configuration information storehouse being pre-configured with comprises at least one region to be assessed is corresponding with described regional code is corresponding with described item id, mark that each base station is corresponding and network formats; Described planning station list at least includes the mark of each planning base station and the essential information of correspondence;
First acquiring unit, is used for obtaining website importance allocation list; Described website importance allocation list is configured with at least one assessment factor, the corresponding allocation list of each described assessment factor;
Computing unit, for according at least one assessment factor of configuration in described website importance allocation list, calculating the score value that in described planning station list, each described planning base station is corresponding under each assessment factor;
Second acquisition unit, for the score value corresponding under each assessment factor according to each described planning base station, obtains the comprehensive grading parameters that each described planning base station is corresponding;
Determine unit, for being ranked up by comprehensive grading parameters corresponding for described each described planning base station, it is determined that the importance ranking of each described planning base station in described region to be assessed.
10. device according to claim 9, it is characterized in that, described website importance allocation list is configured with at least two assessment factor, wherein, each assessment factor is a corresponding priority respectively, the weighted value that different priority is corresponding different, the weighted value of the assessment factor that weighted value that assessment factor that priority is high is corresponding is low more than priority;
Accordingly, described second acquisition unit, including:
According toDetermine the comprehensive grading parameters that each described planning base station is corresponding; Wherein, Q is the comprehensive grading parameters that a planning base station is corresponding, xiIt is a planning base station score value under i-th assessment factor, λiFor the weighted value that i-th assessment factor is corresponding;N >=2.
11. device according to claim 9, it is characterised in that in described website importance allocation list, at least one assessment factor of configuration includes the combination of following any one or more assessment factor:
Target source factors, area grade factor, planning scene factor, structure risk factor and construction cost factor.
12. device according to claim 11, it is characterised in that if it is determined that described assessment factor is target source factors, described computing unit, including:
First acquisition module, for obtaining the allocation list in target source corresponding to described planning station list in slave site planning platform; Wherein, including at least a sub-goal source in the allocation list in described target source, each described sub-goal source is a corresponding priority respectively, the score value that different priority is corresponding different, the score value that sub-goal source that score value corresponding to sub-goal source that priority is high is low more than priority is corresponding, the score value difference preset multiple between adjacent priority;
First determines module, the priority that the sub-goal of the allocation list configuration for originating according to described target is originated, it is determined that each described planning base station score value under each described sub-goal is originated;
Computing module, for by each described planning base station each described sub-goal originate under score value summation, obtain the target score of each described planning base station; Wherein, each target score comprises at least one digit order number;
Second determines module, for by the figure place of digit order number corresponding for the target score of each described planning base station, it is determined that for the score value that each described planning base station is corresponding under target source factors.
13. device according to claim 11, it is characterised in that if it is determined that described assessment factor is planning scene factor, described computing unit also includes:
Second acquisition module, for obtaining the allocation list of planning scene corresponding to described planning station list in slave site planning platform; Wherein, the allocation list of described planning scene includes at least a subplan scene, each described subplan scene is a corresponding priority respectively, the score value that different priority is corresponding different, the score value that subplan scene that score value corresponding to subplan scene that priority is high is low more than priority is corresponding;
First judge module, for judging whether described first planning scene belonging to base station exists corresponding subplan scene in the allocation list of described planning scene;
3rd acquisition module, for when determining that the scene belonging to described first planning base station exists corresponding subplan scene in the allocation list of described planning scene, obtaining the subplan scene that described first planning base station is corresponding;
3rd determines module, for the priority that the subplan scene corresponding according to described first planning base station is corresponding, it is determined that the score value that described first planning base station is corresponding under planning scene.
14. device according to claim 11, it is characterized in that, described planning station list also includes the information of existing network base station, being configured with the base station dimension index result table that each described planning base station is corresponding in described Bus stop planning platform, described base station dimension index result table includes the grid of grid belonging to each described planning base station and is worth; Wherein, each described planning base station belongs to a grid, and the corresponding grid of each grid is worth;
Accordingly, described computing unit also particularly useful for:
Slave site planning platform obtains the allocation list of area grade corresponding to described planning station list;The allocation list of described area grade comprises the grid being pre-configured with and is worth linear ordering gear;
According to formula Wfinish=((I-Imin)*(W-1)/(Imax-Imin))+1 each described planning base station of calculating gear belonging in the allocation list of described area grade; Wherein, WfinishPlanning, for described second, the gear that base station is corresponding, W is that the grid being pre-configured with is worth linear ordering gear; I is that grid is worth; ImaxGrid maximum in being worth for the grid that grids all in region to be assessed are corresponding is worth; IminGrid minimum in being worth for the grid that grids all in region to be assessed are corresponding is worth;
The gear affiliated in the allocation list of described area grade by described each described planning base station, it is determined that for the score value that each described planning base station is corresponding under area grade.
15. device according to claim 14, it is characterised in that described base station dimension index result table also includes the site density value corresponding to each grid;
Plan that base station, described second planning base station are any one planning base station in described planning station list for second;
Accordingly, described computing unit also includes:
Relating module, for being associated the second planning base station described in described planning station list with the allocation list of the structure risk in Bus stop planning platform; The allocation list of described structure risk comprises default rational density value range, default excessive risk early warning value and default risk rising step-length;
Second judge module, is designated micro-base station for what judge whether to exist in described planning station list the second planning base station;
Unit is set, for described second judge module determine in described planning station list exist second planning base station be designated micro-base station, then by described second plan base station priority be set to the first priority; Described second planning base station is any one planning base station in described planning station list;
4th acquisition module, for determining that the mark that there is the 3rd planning base station in described planning station list is not micro-base station at described second judge module, then obtains the site density value that described 3rd planning base station is corresponding from the dimension index result table of described base station;
Comparison module, for being compared by the allocation list of site density value corresponding for described 3rd planning base station with described structure risk, obtains comparative result;
Configuration module, for according to described comparative result, being respectively provided with priority for described planning base station each in described planning station list;
5th acquisition module, for priority according to each described planning base station, gives a score value for each described planning base station respectively so that score value corresponding to the high planning base station of priority is high, and score value corresponding to planning base station that priority is low is low; Obtain the score value that each described planning base station is corresponding under structure risk.
16. device according to claim 15, it is characterised in that for the 4th plan base station, accordingly, described configuration module specifically for:
If it is determined that X≤D, then plan that the priority of base station is set to the first priority by the described 4th;
If it is determined that D < X≤A, then plan that the priority of base station is set to X/S by the described 4th;
If it is determined that A < X, then plan that the priority of base station is set to by the described 4th) (A-D)/S)+(X-A); Wherein, D is that the allocation list of described structure risk comprises default rational density value range; X is the site density value that described 5th planning base station is corresponding; A is default excessive risk early warning value; S is default risk rising step-length.
CN201610147377.9A 2016-03-15 2016-03-15 A kind of method and apparatus for planning website evaluation Active CN105682105B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201610147377.9A CN105682105B (en) 2016-03-15 2016-03-15 A kind of method and apparatus for planning website evaluation

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201610147377.9A CN105682105B (en) 2016-03-15 2016-03-15 A kind of method and apparatus for planning website evaluation

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN105682105A true CN105682105A (en) 2016-06-15
CN105682105B CN105682105B (en) 2019-06-14

Family

ID=56310477

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201610147377.9A Active CN105682105B (en) 2016-03-15 2016-03-15 A kind of method and apparatus for planning website evaluation

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN105682105B (en)

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106851669A (en) * 2017-02-06 2017-06-13 中国铁塔股份有限公司 A kind of wireless site Valuation Method and system
CN107222871A (en) * 2017-06-19 2017-09-29 国网浙江省电力公司嘉兴供电公司 A kind of wireless private network electric power base station planning methods of TD LTE 230
CN107241743A (en) * 2017-06-19 2017-10-10 国网浙江省电力公司嘉兴供电公司 Power network private network is laid out building method
CN107730022A (en) * 2016-08-12 2018-02-23 中国移动通信集团河北有限公司 A kind of network point distribution appraisal procedure and device
CN108243425A (en) * 2016-12-23 2018-07-03 中国移动通信集团公司 A kind of location determining method and device of base station yet to be built
CN109768886A (en) * 2019-01-03 2019-05-17 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 Network planning evaluation method and device
CN110601208A (en) * 2019-09-12 2019-12-20 深圳供电局有限公司 Accurate load control method and system based on multi-dimensional load attributes
CN110602713A (en) * 2018-05-23 2019-12-20 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 Base station construction evaluation method and device
CN110708706A (en) * 2019-10-12 2020-01-17 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 Area evaluation method, apparatus and storage medium
CN110890974A (en) * 2018-09-11 2020-03-17 珠海格力电器股份有限公司 Configuration method, device and equipment of base station network node and positioning system
CN111836267A (en) * 2020-06-11 2020-10-27 富春科技股份有限公司 Communication network deployment method and device based on 5G
CN113115240A (en) * 2019-12-24 2021-07-13 中国移动通信集团陕西有限公司 VoLTE telephone traffic promotion method and device based on telephone traffic saving cost
CN114710787A (en) * 2022-04-28 2022-07-05 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 Network planning method, device, equipment and storage equipment

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101448268A (en) * 2008-12-26 2009-06-03 华为技术有限公司 Neighboring configuration method and device thereof and home base configuration method and device thereof
US20130122931A1 (en) * 2010-09-09 2013-05-16 Sony Corporation Information processing apparatus, information processing method, information processing system, and computer program product
CN104410978A (en) * 2014-11-14 2015-03-11 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 Method and device of evaluating site planning

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101448268A (en) * 2008-12-26 2009-06-03 华为技术有限公司 Neighboring configuration method and device thereof and home base configuration method and device thereof
US20130122931A1 (en) * 2010-09-09 2013-05-16 Sony Corporation Information processing apparatus, information processing method, information processing system, and computer program product
CN104410978A (en) * 2014-11-14 2015-03-11 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 Method and device of evaluating site planning

Cited By (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107730022A (en) * 2016-08-12 2018-02-23 中国移动通信集团河北有限公司 A kind of network point distribution appraisal procedure and device
CN108243425A (en) * 2016-12-23 2018-07-03 中国移动通信集团公司 A kind of location determining method and device of base station yet to be built
CN106851669A (en) * 2017-02-06 2017-06-13 中国铁塔股份有限公司 A kind of wireless site Valuation Method and system
CN107241743B (en) * 2017-06-19 2020-11-13 国网浙江省电力公司嘉兴供电公司 Power grid private network layout construction method
CN107241743A (en) * 2017-06-19 2017-10-10 国网浙江省电力公司嘉兴供电公司 Power network private network is laid out building method
CN107222871A (en) * 2017-06-19 2017-09-29 国网浙江省电力公司嘉兴供电公司 A kind of wireless private network electric power base station planning methods of TD LTE 230
CN107222871B (en) * 2017-06-19 2020-10-13 国网浙江省电力公司嘉兴供电公司 TD-LTE 230 wireless private network power base station planning method
CN110602713A (en) * 2018-05-23 2019-12-20 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 Base station construction evaluation method and device
CN110890974A (en) * 2018-09-11 2020-03-17 珠海格力电器股份有限公司 Configuration method, device and equipment of base station network node and positioning system
CN109768886A (en) * 2019-01-03 2019-05-17 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 Network planning evaluation method and device
CN110601208A (en) * 2019-09-12 2019-12-20 深圳供电局有限公司 Accurate load control method and system based on multi-dimensional load attributes
CN110708706A (en) * 2019-10-12 2020-01-17 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 Area evaluation method, apparatus and storage medium
CN110708706B (en) * 2019-10-12 2022-07-22 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 Area evaluation method, apparatus and storage medium
CN113115240A (en) * 2019-12-24 2021-07-13 中国移动通信集团陕西有限公司 VoLTE telephone traffic promotion method and device based on telephone traffic saving cost
CN113115240B (en) * 2019-12-24 2022-09-27 中国移动通信集团陕西有限公司 VoLTE telephone traffic promotion method and device based on telephone traffic saving cost
CN111836267A (en) * 2020-06-11 2020-10-27 富春科技股份有限公司 Communication network deployment method and device based on 5G
CN111836267B (en) * 2020-06-11 2022-06-10 富春科技股份有限公司 Communication network deployment method and device based on 5G
CN114710787A (en) * 2022-04-28 2022-07-05 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 Network planning method, device, equipment and storage equipment
CN114710787B (en) * 2022-04-28 2023-06-20 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 Network planning method, device, equipment and storage equipment

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN105682105B (en) 2019-06-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN105682105A (en) Planned site evaluation method and device
CN109788488B (en) Network station planning method and device
CN108243435B (en) Parameter optimization method and device in LTE cell scene division
CN104410978A (en) Method and device of evaluating site planning
CN104754590A (en) Method and device for assessing LTE (long term evolution) network sites
CN103037424B (en) Evaluation method and device of the 3rd generation telecommunication (3G) network coverage
CN105813092B (en) A kind of building network coverage optimization method and device based on ticket
CN109886533A (en) A kind of analysis method and device of base station construction
CN106301984A (en) A kind of mobile communications network capacity prediction methods and device
CN109768886A (en) Network planning evaluation method and device
CN114641015B (en) Network evaluation method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN110610297B (en) Medium-voltage distribution network grid planning method
CN103209422A (en) Method for accurate spot selection of wireless local area network (WLAN)
CN102395136A (en) Telephone traffic distribution calculation method based on neighbor cell field intensity information and system thereof
CN103634807A (en) WIFI data hotspot cell data monitoring method and WLAN deployment ordering method and device
CN103491544A (en) Method and device for selecting shared station
CN108462965A (en) Share planing method in a kind of steel tower demand site
CN104244446A (en) Method and device for obtaining deployment information of wireless local area network
CN106998563B (en) Indoor distribution system early warning method and device based on network performance
CN107222871A (en) A kind of wireless private network electric power base station planning methods of TD LTE 230
CN107231635B (en) Network coverage analysis method and device
CN114091213A (en) Power communication network planning scheme evaluation system
CN107347189A (en) A kind of wireless private network base station planning methods of TD LTE 230
CN103916870A (en) Four-network-cooperation comprehensive analysis system and method
CN102315646B (en) Maximum power capability based power distribution network communication validity and communication simplifying method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant