CN105678602A - Enterprise credit evaluation method and system used for self-diagnosis platform - Google Patents

Enterprise credit evaluation method and system used for self-diagnosis platform Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN105678602A
CN105678602A CN201511032813.XA CN201511032813A CN105678602A CN 105678602 A CN105678602 A CN 105678602A CN 201511032813 A CN201511032813 A CN 201511032813A CN 105678602 A CN105678602 A CN 105678602A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
evaluation
weight
enterprise
product
credit
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201511032813.XA
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
赵欣
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
TIANJIN MEDICAL WORKSHOP Co Ltd
Original Assignee
TIANJIN MEDICAL WORKSHOP Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by TIANJIN MEDICAL WORKSHOP Co Ltd filed Critical TIANJIN MEDICAL WORKSHOP Co Ltd
Priority to CN201511032813.XA priority Critical patent/CN105678602A/en
Publication of CN105678602A publication Critical patent/CN105678602A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/0601Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
    • G06Q30/0609Buyer or seller confidence or verification

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention provides an enterprise credit evaluation method used for a self-diagnosis platform. The method comprises the steps of using multiple dimensions to evaluate an enterprise, setting the dimensions with different weights respectively; taking the cumulative sum of the product of the score and the weight of each dimension as the credit degree of the enterprise. According to the present invention, by establishing an enterprise credit evaluation system of the self-diagnosis platform, the enterprises providing products or services are evaluated objectively and accurately on the self-diagnosis platform, so that members can select appropriately and effectively, and the appropriate medical products or medical services are conducive to being adopted to assist or support the treatment.

Description

A kind of evaluation of enterprises credit for autodiagnosis platform and appraisement system
Technical field
The invention belongs to computerized information field, especially relate to a kind of evaluation of enterprises credit for autodiagnosis platform and appraisement system.
Background technology
Quickly, life stress is also very big, and this just brings a lot of secret worry for the healthy of people for the rhythm of life of present stage people. People once healthy go wrong, first-selected Shi Qu hospital, but the people seen a doctor in hospital seems again to be very many forever, he even some little symptom, the whole flow process seen a doctor is got off and can be spent a lot of time; And if people feel to waste time, be unwilling hospital, simply buys a little medicine according to the experience of oneself and takes, likely misses so again golden hour, delay the state of an illness.
Based on this phenomenon, if able to there is an information platform helping people to carry out disease autodiagnosis, people will be produced huge help, the sufferer of oneself by the content of information platform, in conjunction with the situation of self, first can be carried out the judgement at initial stage by people, symptom is slight, the simple treatment of oneself can be carried out according to the content of information platform, during the adventurous development trend of symptom, then go hospitalize.
There is autodiagnosis platform, then on autodiagnosis platform, need platform member is provided various medical product or medical services accordingly, so that sufferer adopts suitable medical product or medical services are assisted or partner treatment, but in order to provide the user with the articles for use being suitable for and can be relieved, secure, just need a kind of objective credit appraisal system badly and the enterprise providing various medical product or medical services on platform is passed judgment on.
Summary of the invention
The problem to be solved in the present invention is to design a kind of evaluation of enterprises credit for autodiagnosis platform and appraisement system, for autodiagnosis platform provides the enterprise of product or service make objective, evaluate accurately, in order to member makes suitably and effectively selects.
In order to achieve the above object, the technical scheme that the present invention takes is: a kind of evaluation of enterprises credit for autodiagnosis platform, it is characterised in that including:
(4) adopt multiple dimension that enterprise is evaluated;
(5) each dimension is provided with different weights;
(6) cumulative sum of the product of the score of each dimension and weight, namely as the credit rating of this enterprise.
Preferably, described various dimensions include: user evaluates, evaluates quantity, product advantage; The credit rating formula of enterprise: business standing degree=user evaluates * weight+evaluation quantity * weight+product advantage * weight.
Further, described weight adjusts as the case may be in real time.
Preferably, described user evaluates the cumulative sum of the score equal to multiple factors of evaluation and the product of its evaluation weight shared in credit appraisal.
Further, described factor of evaluation and evaluation weight shared by it include:
Feedback opinion after user is on probation, evaluation weight 0.2;
Individual is to valuation of enterprise, evaluation weight 0.2;
Individual is to enterprise product evaluation, evaluation weight 0.2;
Other enterprises are to this valuation of enterprise, evaluation weight 0.1;
This enterprise product is evaluated by other enterprises, evaluation weight 0.1;
The company information of this enterprise input, evaluation weight 0.1;
The product information of this enterprise input, evaluation weight 0.1.
Should a kind of credit rank assessment system for autodiagnosis platform in aforementioned manners, it is characterised in that include various dimensions evaluation module, weight setting module, business standing degree module; Described various dimensions evaluation module evaluates the dimension of enterprise for arranging, and described weight setting module is for arranging the weight of each dimension, and described business standing degree module calculates business standing degree for the cumulative sum of the mark according to each dimension and the product of weight.
Preferably, described various dimensions evaluation module include user evaluate submodule, evaluate quantity submodule, product advantage submodule; Described each submodule is used for obtaining calculating respective mark, and described business standing degree module is according to the mark of each submodule and respective weight calculation business standing degree.
Further, described weight setting module carries out the real-time adjustment of weight as the case may be.
Preferably, described user evaluates submodule and includes multiple factor of evaluation unit, and described factor of evaluation unit is used for the score of Calculation Estimation factor and the product of shared evaluation weight.
Further, described factor of evaluation unit includes:
Feedback opinion subelement after user is on probation, evaluation weight 0.2;
Individual is to valuation of enterprise subelement, evaluation weight 0.2;
Enterprise product is evaluated subelement, evaluation weight 0.2 by individual;
Other enterprises are to this valuation of enterprise subelement, evaluation weight 0.1;
This enterprise product is evaluated subelement, evaluation weight 0.1 by other enterprises;
The company information subelement of this enterprise input, evaluation weight 0.1;
The product information subelement of this enterprise input, evaluation weight 0.1.
The invention have the benefit that and pass through the present invention, set up the credit rank assessment system of autodiagnosis platform, for autodiagnosis platform providing the enterprise of product or service make objective, credit appraisal accurately, so that member makes suitably and effectively selects, facilitate views with suitable medical product or medical services are assisted or partner treatment.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is the schematic diagram in the embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed description of the invention
Below in conjunction with specific embodiment, the present invention will be further described.
As it is shown in figure 1, the present invention adopts multiple dimension that enterprise is evaluated, each dimension is provided with the cumulative sum of different weights, the score of each dimension and the product of weight, namely as the credit rating of this enterprise.
One preferred scheme is that various dimensions adopt: user evaluates, evaluates quantity, product advantage;
So credit rating formula of enterprise: business standing degree=user evaluates * weight+evaluation quantity * weight+product advantage * weight.
Wherein, weight adjusts as the case may be in real time, and wherein factor is a lot, puts out a new product with enterprise or the change etc. of newly service or the change of affiliated industry field, new technique has relation.
In formula, described user evaluates the cumulative sum of the score equal to multiple factors of evaluation and the product of its evaluation weight shared in credit appraisal.
Specifically, described factor of evaluation and evaluation weight shared by it include:
Feedback opinion after user is on probation, evaluation weight 0.2;
Individual is to valuation of enterprise, evaluation weight 0.2;
Individual is to enterprise product evaluation, evaluation weight 0.2;
Other enterprises are to this valuation of enterprise, evaluation weight 0.1;
This enterprise product is evaluated by other enterprises, evaluation weight 0.1;
The company information of this enterprise input, evaluation weight 0.1;
The product information of this enterprise input, evaluation weight 0.1.
The foregoing is only specific embodiments of the invention, the protection domain being not intended to limit the present invention, all within the spirit and principles in the present invention, any amendment of making, equivalent replacement, improvement etc., should be included within protection scope of the present invention.

Claims (10)

1. the evaluation of enterprises credit for autodiagnosis platform, it is characterised in that including:
(1) adopt multiple dimension that enterprise is evaluated;
(2) each dimension is provided with different weights;
(3) cumulative sum of the product of the score of each dimension and weight, namely as the credit rating of this enterprise.
2. a kind of evaluation of enterprises credit for autodiagnosis platform according to claim 1, it is characterised in that described various dimensions include: user evaluates, evaluates quantity, product advantage; The credit rating formula of enterprise: business standing degree=user evaluates * weight+evaluation quantity * weight+product advantage * weight.
3. a kind of evaluation of enterprises credit for autodiagnosis platform according to claim 1 and 2, it is characterised in that described weight adjusts as the case may be in real time.
4. a kind of evaluation of enterprises credit for autodiagnosis platform according to claim 2, it is characterised in that described user evaluates the cumulative sum of the score equal to multiple factors of evaluation and the product of its evaluation weight shared in credit appraisal.
5. a kind of evaluation of enterprises credit for autodiagnosis platform according to claim 4, it is characterised in that described factor of evaluation and evaluation weight shared by it include:
Feedback opinion after user is on probation, evaluation weight 0.2;
Individual is to valuation of enterprise, evaluation weight 0.2;
Individual is to enterprise product evaluation, evaluation weight 0.2;
Other enterprises are to this valuation of enterprise, evaluation weight 0.1;
This enterprise product is evaluated by other enterprises, evaluation weight 0.1;
The company information of this enterprise input, evaluation weight 0.1;
The product information of this enterprise input, evaluation weight 0.1.
6. a kind of credit rank assessment system for autodiagnosis platform of method described in application claim 1, it is characterised in that include various dimensions evaluation module, weight setting module, business standing degree module; Described various dimensions evaluation module evaluates the dimension of enterprise for arranging, and described weight setting module is for arranging the weight of each dimension, and described business standing degree module calculates business standing degree for the cumulative sum of the mark according to each dimension and the product of weight.
7. a kind of credit rank assessment system for autodiagnosis platform according to claim 6, it is characterised in that described various dimensions evaluation module includes user and evaluates submodule, evaluates quantity submodule, product advantage submodule; Described each submodule is used for obtaining calculating respective mark, and described business standing degree module is according to the mark of each submodule and respective weight calculation business standing degree.
8. a kind of credit rank assessment system for autodiagnosis platform according to claim 6 or 7, it is characterised in that described weight setting module carries out the real-time adjustment of weight as the case may be.
9. a kind of credit rank assessment system for autodiagnosis platform according to claim 7, it is characterized in that, described user evaluates submodule and includes multiple factor of evaluation unit, and described factor of evaluation unit is used for the score of Calculation Estimation factor and the product of shared evaluation weight.
10. a kind of credit rank assessment system for autodiagnosis platform according to claim 9, it is characterised in that described factor of evaluation unit includes:
Feedback opinion subelement after user is on probation, evaluation weight 0.2;
Individual is to valuation of enterprise subelement, evaluation weight 0.2;
Enterprise product is evaluated subelement, evaluation weight 0.2 by individual;
Other enterprises are to this valuation of enterprise subelement, evaluation weight 0.1;
This enterprise product is evaluated subelement, evaluation weight 0.1 by other enterprises;
The company information subelement of this enterprise input, evaluation weight 0.1;
The product information subelement of this enterprise input, evaluation weight 0.1.
CN201511032813.XA 2015-12-31 2015-12-31 Enterprise credit evaluation method and system used for self-diagnosis platform Pending CN105678602A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201511032813.XA CN105678602A (en) 2015-12-31 2015-12-31 Enterprise credit evaluation method and system used for self-diagnosis platform

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201511032813.XA CN105678602A (en) 2015-12-31 2015-12-31 Enterprise credit evaluation method and system used for self-diagnosis platform

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN105678602A true CN105678602A (en) 2016-06-15

Family

ID=56189981

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201511032813.XA Pending CN105678602A (en) 2015-12-31 2015-12-31 Enterprise credit evaluation method and system used for self-diagnosis platform

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN105678602A (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106777964A (en) * 2016-12-13 2017-05-31 天津迈沃医药技术股份有限公司 Data message sort method and system based on medical information platform
CN108197816A (en) * 2018-01-17 2018-06-22 吉林省吉好生活服务有限公司 A kind of credit system evaluation method based on household services
CN109272194A (en) * 2018-08-15 2019-01-25 深圳市嘀哒知经科技有限责任公司 A kind of reputation evaluation method of technical ability intercommunion platform

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102436622A (en) * 2011-12-28 2012-05-02 浙江汇信科技有限公司 Method for evaluating network market operator credit status
CN102609844A (en) * 2011-01-20 2012-07-25 李安渝 Credibility evaluating method on basis of enterprise credibility filling
CN103325013A (en) * 2013-06-07 2013-09-25 华迪计算机集团有限公司 Enterprise information digital evaluation method and device
CN104504570A (en) * 2014-12-01 2015-04-08 武汉爱科软件技术有限公司 Credit evaluation method for transaction subjects on cloud manufacturing service platform

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102609844A (en) * 2011-01-20 2012-07-25 李安渝 Credibility evaluating method on basis of enterprise credibility filling
CN102436622A (en) * 2011-12-28 2012-05-02 浙江汇信科技有限公司 Method for evaluating network market operator credit status
CN103325013A (en) * 2013-06-07 2013-09-25 华迪计算机集团有限公司 Enterprise information digital evaluation method and device
CN104504570A (en) * 2014-12-01 2015-04-08 武汉爱科软件技术有限公司 Credit evaluation method for transaction subjects on cloud manufacturing service platform

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106777964A (en) * 2016-12-13 2017-05-31 天津迈沃医药技术股份有限公司 Data message sort method and system based on medical information platform
CN108197816A (en) * 2018-01-17 2018-06-22 吉林省吉好生活服务有限公司 A kind of credit system evaluation method based on household services
CN109272194A (en) * 2018-08-15 2019-01-25 深圳市嘀哒知经科技有限责任公司 A kind of reputation evaluation method of technical ability intercommunion platform

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Nicolson et al. Interventions to increase adherence to therapeutic exercise in older adults with low back pain and/or hip/knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Kim et al. Effect of national implementation of utstein recommendation from the global resuscitation alliance on ten steps to improve outcomes from Out-of-Hospital cardiac arrest: a ten-year observational study in Korea
Tibby et al. Establishment of an innovative specialist cardiac indigenous outreach service in rural and remote Queensland
Gibson et al. Effects of aquatic therapy and land-based therapy versus land-based therapy alone on range of motion, edema, and function after hip or knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Stevenson et al. Group cognitive behavioural therapy for postnatal depression: a systematic review of clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and value of information analyses.
Humphreys et al. University Departments of Rural Health: is a national network of multidisciplinary academic departments in Australia making a difference?
Klijs et al. Educational disparities in the burden of disability: contributions of disease prevalence and disabling impact
CN105678602A (en) Enterprise credit evaluation method and system used for self-diagnosis platform
Barker et al. Home-based rehabilitation programme compared with traditional physiotherapy for patients at risk of poor outcome after knee arthroplasty: the CORKA randomised controlled trial
Mu et al. Improving client safety: strategies to prevent and reduce practice errors in occupational therapy
Cheng et al. The impact of human resources for health on the health outcomes of Chinese people
Hsueh et al. A simplified stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement instrument
CN105678065A (en) Disease self-diagnosing knowledge questioning and answering method and system based on disease circles
CN106777966A (en) Data interactive training method and system based on medical information platform
Trethewey et al. The impact of resuscitation guideline terminology on quality of dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomised controlled manikin study
Jette et al. Adaptive short forms for outpatient rehabilitation outcome assessment
Strauser et al. Impact not efficacy: Applying the RE-AIM framework to rehabilitation counseling research
DeVandry et al. Mandating nurse staffing in Pennsylvania: More than a numbers game
Wang et al. Stated preferences for family doctor contract services: a survey of the rural elderly in Anhui Province, China
Loh et al. Occupational Therapy Profession for Women Health–Challenges for its Under Developed Services
Polymeris et al. An average body circumference can be a substitute for body mass index in women
Li et al. Evaluation of Work Efficiency and Medical Quality for a Hospital on the PPP Model in China with Benchmarking and GRA.
Tran et al. Determinants influencing financial performance of public hospitals: the case of Vietnam
Khayal Healthcare quality improvement: the need for a macro-systems approach
Pollard Working in social enterprises

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20160615

RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication