CN105678466A - Method for judging section quality of cold-rolled base material - Google Patents

Method for judging section quality of cold-rolled base material Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN105678466A
CN105678466A CN201610023955.8A CN201610023955A CN105678466A CN 105678466 A CN105678466 A CN 105678466A CN 201610023955 A CN201610023955 A CN 201610023955A CN 105678466 A CN105678466 A CN 105678466A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
grade
convexity
wedge shape
local high
goods
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201610023955.8A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
邵健
何安瑞
孙文权
宋勇
夏鹰飞
宋小芳
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
DESIGN RESEARCH INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BEIJING
University of Science and Technology Beijing USTB
Original Assignee
DESIGN RESEARCH INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BEIJING
University of Science and Technology Beijing USTB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by DESIGN RESEARCH INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BEIJING, University of Science and Technology Beijing USTB filed Critical DESIGN RESEARCH INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BEIJING
Priority to CN201610023955.8A priority Critical patent/CN105678466A/en
Publication of CN105678466A publication Critical patent/CN105678466A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G06Q10/06395Quality analysis or management

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Metal Rolling (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for judging the section quality of a cold-rolled base material. The cold-rolled base material of the method is a main product of hot rolled strip steel, the section quality mainly includes degree of convexity, wedge shape and local high points, after measured data are obtained from a section detection instrument, and the multi-interval hit rate and variance of the section quality of the cold rolled base material are calculated and are compared with a set hit rate threshold value and variance threshold value in sequence and are synthesized, thereby obtaining a conclusion of a first-class product, a second-class product or an unqualified product. The method for judging the section quality of the cold rolled base material proposed by the invention fully considers real demands of downstream users for the cold rolled base material, has essential difference compared with the traditional single hit rate, and provides an effective method for evaluation of the section quality of the cold rolled base material.

Description

A kind of cross section quality decision method of cold rolling base
Technical field
The present invention relates to machinery and automation on metallurgy, rolling technique, refer specifically to the cross section quality decision method of a kind of cold rolling base.
Technical background
Cold rolling base is the major product of hot-strip, provides raw material for cold rolling process. Cold rolling base section configuration is had strict requirement by cold rolling process, if section configuration is not good, it is easy to cause that muscle has occurred in cold rolling process, the problem such as the little broken sea of edge and rolling stability. The section configuration quality of cold rolling base mainly includes convexity, wedge shape and local high spot, its camber refers to the difference of strip steel central point thickness and the strip steel two a range of thickness average value of lateral extent edge, C can be obtained again according to two lateral extent sizes (such as 25mm, 40mm, 75mm etc.)25, C40, C75, usual more employing C40As convexity index; Wedge shape refers to the difference of the strip steel two a range of thickness of lateral extent edge, can obtain again W according to two lateral extent sizes (such as 25mm, 40mm, 75mm etc.)25, W40, W75, usual more employing W40As wedge shape index; Local high spot HsRefer to the difference of section abnormity point maximum and matched curve correspondence position. For 40mm position, being illustrated in figure 1 the schematic diagram of cold rolling base section, method for expressing and the computational methods of its camber and wedge shape are as follows:
C40=Hc–(Hd40+Ho40)/2
W40=Hd40-Ho40
Wherein: HcFor the middle dot thickness of cold rolling base section, Hd40And Ho40The respectively belt steel thickness of transmission side and fore side distance edge 40mm. C40、W40、HsCan directly obtain by being arranged on the bottom profiler at scene, the time of general about 1 second can measure one group of data of cross section taken in correspondence, return to process control computer for analyzing and achieving, assume that certain strip steel total length is 1000m, mill speed is 10m/s, the rolling time of this strip steel is 100s, altogether can obtain 100 groups of C40、W40、HsMeasured data.
Generally, the cross section quality decision method of cold rolling base mainly adopts single hit rate statistical, namely convexity hit rate or wedge shape hit rate is adopted to represent, first convexity desired value and positive and negative deviation and wedge shape desired value and positive and negative deviation are set, calculate convexity respectively and wedge shape measured value falls the quantity that the corresponding deviation of target is interval, obtain convexity and wedge shape hit rate, judge to control quality control precision by the size of hit rate.This method is also widely used in the various quality judgings of industrial system, but, for cold rolling base, this method also exists following deficiency:
1) cold rolling base can tolerate that convexity is bigger than normal, but it is less than normal to can't stand convexity, for this, the positive negative direction of convexity tolerance also exists asymmetric situation in actual use, and same hit rate has different downstream user and experiences (such as super equally lower limit and super lower proportion ratio);
2) if the big ups and downs in the margin of tolerance of the convexity of cold rolling base and wedge shape, even if there being higher hit rate, the result of use of downstream user is also undesirable;
3) cold rolling base is strict to the demand of cross section quality, and existing convexity and wedge shape calculate independent hit rate respectively, a not comprehensive section evaluation criterion.
At present the cross section quality of cold rolling base is judged that research is considerably less, such as document " hot rolling quality judging thought and realization " (metallurgical automation, supplementary issue in 2006, S2, introducing the determination processing of coils of hot-rolled steel overall dimensions in 72-715), the method for Main Basis is that the control rate that plate profile instrument table detected value and L3 are assigned simply contrasts, and draws result of determination, this is the hit rate statistical that above-mentioned described employing is single, and its shortcoming is also in above-mentioned middle statement. The shape wave of strip steel is mainly carried out quality judging by patent " a kind of online decision method of the strip shape quality suitable in hot rolled thin specification strip steel " (grant number: 201210135076.6), and cross section quality mentioned in this article judges judging there is essential distinction in content. Patent " a kind of cold rolling flatness quality judging method based on fuzzy algorithmic approach " (application number: 201510048339.3) refer to the quality judging method of a kind of cold rolling flatness, and the cross section quality that text is mentioned judges judging to have equally in content essential difference.
For this, for solving problem above, the present invention proposes the cross section quality decision method of a kind of cold rolling base, after obtaining measured data from section instrumentation, by calculating how interval hit rate and the variance of cold rolling base cross section quality, and be sequentially carried out and compare with the hit rate threshold value set, variance threshold values and comprehensively, obtain Grade A, goods of inferior quality or defective work conclusion. The cold rolling base cross section quality decision method that the present invention proposes has taken into full account the downstream user real demand to cold rolling base, judges to compare the difference with essence with traditional single hit rate, and the cross section quality evaluation for cold rolling base provides effective ways.
Summary of the invention
Based on above analysis, the cross section quality decision method of cold rolling base needs to consider the cold-rolled process actual demand to incoming hot rolled slab so that result of determination more can press close to service condition, and for this, cross section quality proposed by the invention judges to need to consider following aspect:
1) decision process needs to consider the impact of convexity, wedge shape and local high spot;
2) from subitem result of determination, synthetic determination result should be able to be obtained by certain rule;
3) during subitem judges, it is contemplated that lower procedure is to the degrees of tolerance difference of lower deviation in convexity.
A kind of cold rolling base cross section quality decision method that the present invention is previously mentioned, it is characterised in that described method comprises the steps of:
Step 1: obtain cold rolling base total length cross section quality data from section instrumentation, including distance edge 40mm place convexity C40, distance edge 40mm place wedge shape W40, local high spot Hs;
Step 2: set convexity desired value CA, convexity tolerance interval C, C=15 μm-20 μm;Carry out following convexity according to measured data and local high spot judge:
2.1 calculate convexity C40Drop on [CA-C,CA+ C] interval hit rate Pc1, set hit rate threshold
Value σ c1, σc1=95.4%;
2.2 calculate convexity C40Drop on [CA-C,CA+ 2C] hit rate Pc2, set hit rate threshold
Value σc2, σc2=95.4%;
2.3 calculate convexity C40Variance Pc3, convexity variance threshold values scope σc3=8-10 μm;
2.4 obtain local high spot meansigma methods Hs_avg, local high spot threshold range σc4=15-20 μm;
2.5 convexitys and local high spot grade decision rule:
Grade A standard: Pc1c1And Pc3c3,Hs_avgc4;
Goods of inferior quality standard: be unsatisfactory for Grade A standard, but Pc2c2And Hs_avgc4;
Defective standard: be unsatisfactory for Grade A or goods of inferior quality standard;
Step 3: set wedge shape desired value WA, W, W=15 μm-20 μm of wedge tolerance interval, carry out following wedge shape judgement according to measured data:
3.1 wedge shape W40Drop on [WA-W,WA+ W] hit rate Pw1, set hit rate threshold value
σw1, σw1=95.4%;
3.2 wedge shape W40Drop on [WA-1.5W,WA+ 1.5W] hit rate Pw2, set hit rate
Threshold value σw2, σw2=95.4%;
3.3 wedge shape W40Variance Pw3, wedge shape variance threshold values σw3=8-10 μm;
3.4 wedge shape grade decision rules:
Grade A standard: Pw1w1And Pw3w3;
Goods of inferior quality standard: be unsatisfactory for Grade A standard, Pw2w2;
Defective standard: be unsatisfactory for Grade A or goods of inferior quality standard;
Step 4: judging to judge with wedge shape grade in conjunction with convexity and local high spot grade, taking both the lowest class is principle, obtains cold rolling base cross section quality synthetic determination result as follows:
1) if convexity and local high spot judge grade: Grade A, wedge shape judges grade: Grade A, then synthetic determination grade: Grade A;
2) if convexity and local high spot judge grade: Grade A, wedge shape judges grade: goods of inferior quality, then synthetic determination grade: goods of inferior quality;
3) if convexity and local high spot judge grade: Grade A, wedge shape judges grade: defective, then synthetic determination grade: defective;
4) if convexity and local high spot judge grade: goods of inferior quality, wedge shape judges grade: Grade A, then synthetic determination grade: goods of inferior quality;
5) if convexity and local high spot judge grade: goods of inferior quality, wedge shape judges grade: goods of inferior quality, then synthetic determination grade: goods of inferior quality;
6) if convexity and local high spot judge grade: goods of inferior quality, wedge shape judges grade: defective, then synthetic determination grade: defective;
7) if convexity and local high spot judge grade: defective, wedge shape judges grade: Grade A, then synthetic determination grade: defective;
8) if convexity and local high spot judge grade: defective, wedge shape judges grade: goods of inferior quality, then synthetic determination grade: defective;
9) if convexity and local high spot judge grade: defective, wedge shape judges grade: defective, then synthetic determination grade: defective.
The flow chart of decision method is as shown in Figure 2. The present invention transforms without existing system is carried out hardware, significantly revise without to software system structure, have only in existing system, quality judging method and algorithm are again write and replaced and can realize the effective judgement to cold rolling base cross section quality, it is possible to increased quality and early warning for enterprise provide useful help.
Accompanying drawing explanation
The schematic diagram of Fig. 1 cold rolling base section.
The cross section quality decision method flow chart of Fig. 2 cold rolling base.
Detailed description of the invention
Producing the trade mark for DC03 with certain iron and steel enterprise 1450mm hot-rolling mill, thickness specification is 4.0mm, and the cold rolling base that width specifications is 1275mm is example, introduces specific implementation of the patent mode.
Step 1: obtain cold rolling base total length cross section quality data from section instrumentation, including convexity, wedge shape, local high spot. As shown in the table, wherein, No is counting of this cold rolling base of altogether getting of section instrument, and entire volume strip steel gets 65 cross sections altogether in process of production; Time is the concrete time obtaining each cross section; The strip length position that StripLen is corresponding when being get each cross section; StripWid is the actual measurement width that each cross section is corresponding; C40Convex value for each cross-sectional distance edge 40mm place; W40Shim values for each cross-sectional distance edge 40mm place; HsLocal high spot value for each cross section.
Step 2: set convexity desired value CA=40 μm, convexity tolerance interval C=18 μm.
1) can calculate from table and obtain, convexity C40Drop on [22 μm, 58 μm] interval hit rate Pc1=100%, set hit rate threshold value σc1=95.4%;
2) can calculate from table and obtain, convexity C40Drop on the hit rate P of [22 μm, 76 μm]c2=100%, set hit rate threshold value σc2=95.4%;
3) can calculate from table and obtain, convexity C40Variance Pc3=4.64 μm, set convexity variance threshold values σc3=8 μm;
4) can calculate from table and obtain, local high spot meansigma methods Hs_avg=7.69 μm, set local high spot threshold value σc4=15 μm;
Can obtaining according to convexity and local high spot grade decision rule, the result of calculation of measured data meets Grade A standard: Pc1c1And Pc3c3, Hs_avgc4, judge to obtain this cold rolling base as Grade A by convexity and local high spot grade for this.
Step 3: set wedge shape desired value WA=0 μm, wedge tolerance value W=20 μm.
1) can calculate from table and obtain, wedge shape W40Drop on the hit rate P of [-20 μm, 20 μm]w1=76.9%, set hit rate threshold value σw1=95.4%;
2) can calculate from table and obtain, wedge shape W40Drop on the hit rate P of [-30 μm, 30 μm]w2=96.92%, set hit rate threshold value σw2=95.4%;
3) can calculate from table and obtain, wedge shape W40Variance Pw3=6.99 μm, set wedge shape variance threshold values σw3=10 μm;
Can obtaining according to wedge shape grade decision rule, the result of calculation of measured data is unsatisfactory for Grade A standard: Pw1w1And Pw3c3, but meet goods of inferior quality standard: it is unsatisfactory for Grade A standard, Pw2w2, judge to obtain this cold rolling base as goods of inferior quality by wedge shape grade for this.
Step 4: judging to judge with wedge shape grade in conjunction with convexity and local high spot grade, taking both the lowest class is principle, and obtaining cold rolling base cross section quality synthetic determination result is goods of inferior quality, meets following criterion:
If convexity and local high spot judge grade: Grade A, wedge shape judges grade: goods of inferior quality, then synthetic determination grade: goods of inferior quality.

Claims (1)

1. the cross section quality decision method of a cold rolling base, it is characterised in that described method comprises the steps of:
Step 1: obtain cold rolling base total length cross section quality data from section instrumentation, including distance edge 40mm place convexity C40, distance edge 40mm place wedge shape W40, local high spot Hs;
Step 2: set convexity desired value CA, convexity tolerance interval C, C=15 μm-20 μm; Carry out convexity and local high spot according to measured data in conjunction with following condition to judge:
2.1 calculate convexity C40Drop on [CA-C,CA+ C] interval hit rate Pc1, set hit rate threshold value σc1, σc1=95.4%;
2.2 calculate convexity C40Drop on [CA-C,CA+ 2C] hit rate Pc2, set hit rate threshold value σc2, σc2=95.4%;
2.3 calculate convexity C40Variance Pc3, convexity variance threshold values scope σc3=8-10 μm;
2.4 obtain local high spot meansigma methods Hs_avg, local high spot threshold range σc4=15-20 μm;
2.5 convexitys and local high spot grade decision rule:
Grade A standard: Pc1c1And Pc3c3,Hs_avgc4;
Goods of inferior quality standard: be unsatisfactory for Grade A standard, but Pc2c2And Hs_avgc4;
Defective standard: be unsatisfactory for Grade A or goods of inferior quality standard;
Step 3: set wedge shape desired value WA, W, W=15 μm-20 μm of wedge tolerance interval, carry out following wedge shape judgement according to measured data:
3.1 wedge shape W40Drop on [WA-W,WA+ W] hit rate Pw1, set hit rate threshold value σw1, σw1=95.4%;
3.2 wedge shape W40Drop on [WA-1.5W,WA+ 1.5W] hit rate Pw2, set hit rate threshold value σw2, σw2=95.4%;
3.3 wedge shape W40Variance Pw3, wedge shape variance threshold values σw3=8-10 μm;
3.4 wedge shape grade decision rules:
Grade A standard: Pw1w1And Pw3w3;
Goods of inferior quality standard: be unsatisfactory for Grade A standard, Pw2w2;
Defective standard: be unsatisfactory for Grade A or goods of inferior quality standard;
Step 4: judging to judge with wedge shape grade in conjunction with convexity and local high spot grade, taking both the lowest class is principle, obtains cold rolling base cross section quality synthetic determination result as follows:
1) if convexity and local high spot judge grade: Grade A, wedge shape judges grade: Grade A, then synthetic determination grade: Grade A;
2) if convexity and local high spot judge grade: Grade A, wedge shape judges grade: goods of inferior quality, then synthetic determination grade: goods of inferior quality;
3) if convexity and local high spot judge grade: Grade A, wedge shape judges grade: defective, then synthetic determination grade: defective;
4) if convexity and local high spot judge grade: goods of inferior quality, wedge shape judges grade: Grade A, then synthetic determination grade: goods of inferior quality;
5) if convexity and local high spot judge grade: goods of inferior quality, wedge shape judges grade: goods of inferior quality, then synthetic determination grade: goods of inferior quality;
6) if convexity and local high spot judge grade: goods of inferior quality, wedge shape judges grade: defective, then synthetic determination grade: defective;
7) if convexity and local high spot judge grade: defective, wedge shape judges grade: Grade A, then synthetic determination grade: defective;
8) if convexity and local high spot judge grade: defective, wedge shape judges grade: goods of inferior quality, then synthetic determination grade: defective;
9) if convexity and local high spot judge grade: defective, wedge shape judges grade: defective, then synthetic determination grade: defective.
CN201610023955.8A 2016-01-14 2016-01-14 Method for judging section quality of cold-rolled base material Pending CN105678466A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201610023955.8A CN105678466A (en) 2016-01-14 2016-01-14 Method for judging section quality of cold-rolled base material

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201610023955.8A CN105678466A (en) 2016-01-14 2016-01-14 Method for judging section quality of cold-rolled base material

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN105678466A true CN105678466A (en) 2016-06-15

Family

ID=56300781

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201610023955.8A Pending CN105678466A (en) 2016-01-14 2016-01-14 Method for judging section quality of cold-rolled base material

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN105678466A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107999548A (en) * 2017-12-07 2018-05-08 北京首钢股份有限公司 A kind of recognition methods of hot-strip profile local high spot and device
CN114965935A (en) * 2022-05-17 2022-08-30 马鞍山钢铁股份有限公司 Strip steel quality judgment method and system based on customer requirements

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107999548A (en) * 2017-12-07 2018-05-08 北京首钢股份有限公司 A kind of recognition methods of hot-strip profile local high spot and device
CN107999548B (en) * 2017-12-07 2020-03-17 北京首钢股份有限公司 Method and device for identifying local high points of hot-rolled strip steel profile
CN114965935A (en) * 2022-05-17 2022-08-30 马鞍山钢铁股份有限公司 Strip steel quality judgment method and system based on customer requirements

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN102658298B (en) Plate-shape quality online judgment method applicable to hot-rolled thin strip steel
CN105203731B (en) A kind of strip steel cross-sectional outling defect local high spot quantization method and device
CN104751288A (en) Segment-based multi-dimensional online quality evaluation system and method for steel coils
EP3248702A1 (en) Steel plate quality assurance system
CN107008758B (en) Cold-strip steel high precision plates shape surface roughness On-Line Control Method and system
CN104942017B (en) The determination method of lateral thick difference of cold-rolling strip steels
CN104785535B (en) A kind of cold rolling flatness quality judging method based on fuzzy algorithmic approach
JP2009066658A (en) Material information providing method for outgoing steel plate, and material information using method
CN107900114B (en) The method and device that a kind of pair of cold-rolled strip steel shape quality is evaluated
CN108817103A (en) A kind of other Classified optimization method of steel rolling model steel group layer
TW202113521A (en) Method for generating quality prediction model, quality prediction model, quality prediction method, method for manufacturing metal material, device for generating quality prediction model, and quality prediction device
CN102641902B (en) Rolling pressure setting method of precision rolling phase-change strip steel
CN112307598B (en) Evaluation method for hot rolled strip steel edge plate profile
CN105678466A (en) Method for judging section quality of cold-rolled base material
CN114154794A (en) Steel coil process quality judgment and grading method and device
JP6358222B2 (en) Pass schedule determination method when changing the thickness of the running plate in continuous cold rolling
CN106651945B (en) A kind of silicon steel section thickness difference quality measurement patterned area analysis method
CN103706774A (en) Method for screening slag inclusions and crack defects on surfaces of stainless steel plate blanks
JP5853738B2 (en) Surface defect inspection method and surface defect inspection apparatus
Szarková et al. Influence of longitudinal cold rolling on the surface topography of low carbon structural steel
Haapamäki et al. Data Mining Methods in Hot Steel Rolling for Scale Defect Prediction.
Byon et al. A semi-analytical model for predicting the wear contour in rod rolling process
Belskiy et al. Statistical Regression Analysis of Breakages in Cold Rolling
KR100340544B1 (en) A method for predicting hot deformation resistance in ferritic stainless steels
CN103390114A (en) Detection judging system and method thereof for thickness precision of band steel finished products

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
CB03 Change of inventor or designer information
CB03 Change of inventor or designer information

Inventor after: Shao Jian

Inventor after: Chen Bin

Inventor after: He Anrui

Inventor after: Sun Wenquan

Inventor after: Song Yong

Inventor after: Xia Yingfei

Inventor after: Song Xiaofang

Inventor before: Shao Jian

Inventor before: He Anrui

Inventor before: Sun Wenquan

Inventor before: Song Yong

Inventor before: Xia Yingfei

Inventor before: Song Xiaofang

RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20160615