CN105528674A - Grid planning method based on stochastic dual dynamic theory - Google Patents

Grid planning method based on stochastic dual dynamic theory Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN105528674A
CN105528674A CN201510882815.1A CN201510882815A CN105528674A CN 105528674 A CN105528674 A CN 105528674A CN 201510882815 A CN201510882815 A CN 201510882815A CN 105528674 A CN105528674 A CN 105528674A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
forall
power grid
year
sigma
grid planning
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201510882815.1A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
曾平良
周勤勇
吴志
杨京齐
张小平
代倩
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
State Grid Corp of China SGCC
China Electric Power Research Institute Co Ltd CEPRI
State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co Ltd
University of Birmingham
Original Assignee
State Grid Corp of China SGCC
China Electric Power Research Institute Co Ltd CEPRI
State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co Ltd
University of Birmingham
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by State Grid Corp of China SGCC, China Electric Power Research Institute Co Ltd CEPRI, State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co Ltd, University of Birmingham filed Critical State Grid Corp of China SGCC
Priority to CN201510882815.1A priority Critical patent/CN105528674A/en
Publication of CN105528674A publication Critical patent/CN105528674A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0631Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
    • G06Q10/06315Needs-based resource requirements planning or analysis
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/04Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem"
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/06Energy or water supply
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E40/00Technologies for an efficient electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
    • Y02E40/70Smart grids as climate change mitigation technology in the energy generation sector
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y04INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
    • Y04SSYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
    • Y04S10/00Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
    • Y04S10/50Systems or methods supporting the power network operation or management, involving a certain degree of interaction with the load-side end user applications

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention provides a grid planning method based on the stochastic dual dynamic theory. The method comprises the steps of establishing a grid planning mathematical model, selecting a grid operation scene, solving a grid planning mathematical model, checking the grid operation scene, and using the stochastic dual dynamic theory to optimize the grid planning mathematical model. According to the invention, a load uncertainty and a renewable energy uncertainty are considered, the renewable energy utilization rate is considered, thus a renewable energy access requirement can be satisfied by a planning scheme, the feasibility of the grid planning in different scenes is considered, thus the planning scheme has strong robustness, the N-k safety verification is considered comprehensively, the safety operation requirement can be satisfied by the planning scheme, the SDDP theory is used to establish a grid planning mathematical model under the circumstance of uncertainty, the Bender decomposition method is employed to solve the grid planning mathematical model, and the solving difficulty is reduced.

Description

Power grid planning method based on random dual dynamic theory
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of power grid planning, and particularly relates to a power grid planning method based on a random dual dynamic theory.
Background
As the load and the power generation capacity increase year by year, the power grid needs to be reinforced to improve the transmission capacity, optimize the line investment cost and meet certain operation safety constraints, which is a problem to be solved in power grid planning. With the large scale access of renewable energy sources, it is necessary to transport renewable energy sources far from the load center to the load center in a long-distance transportation manner. Due to the intermittency of renewable energy sources and the difficulty of long-distance transportation, the complexity of power grid planning is increased.
In existing power grid planning studies, more and more studies are taking into account load uncertainty and renewable energy uncertainty in power grid planning. Various methods are used to resolve uncertainties in power grid planning, including Stochastics Dual Dynamic Programming (SDDP). The uncertainty in the power generation planning is investigated with SDDP in the literature "generationexplanationplanning undivided with the properties quotas" (electrical power systems research,2014, vol.114, pp.78-85); the transmission-generation planning problem was studied using the SDDP method in the document "power systems investments planning storage dual dynamic programming" (docorof philiosophy, electrocaland computing engineering, university of cantury, 2008); the thermal-hydro power scheduling problem was investigated using the SDDP method in the literature "sampling and training boiler and boiler system" learning and boiler system "engineering and boiler.
In the existing power grid planning research, N-k safety verification is not considered enough. Most processing methods are to perform N-k verification at the final stage of planning, and if the N-k verification is not satisfied, the relevant lines are reinforced. Such processing methods may not result in an optimal planning solution.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to overcome the defects of the prior art, the invention provides a power grid planning method based on a stochastic dual dynamic theory.
In order to achieve the purpose of the invention, the invention adopts the following technical scheme:
the invention provides a power grid planning method based on a random dual dynamic theory, which comprises the following steps:
step 1: establishing a power grid planning mathematical model;
step 2: selecting a power grid operation scene;
and step 3: solving a power grid planning mathematical model;
and 4, step 4: checking a power grid operation scene;
and 5: and optimizing a power grid planning mathematical model by adopting a random dual dynamic theory.
In the step 1, the uncertainty of the load and the renewable energy is considered, a power grid planning mathematical model is established by taking the sum of the line investment cost and the expected operation cost as a target, and an objective function F is expressed as:
the corresponding constraints of the objective function F are as follows:
Σ g ∈ G i , t p g , d t , s ( ξ ) + Σ e ∈ E · i f e , d t , s ( ξ ) - Σ e ∈ E i · f e , d t , s ( ξ ) + Σ w ∈ W i , t p w , d t , s ( ξ ) + q i , d t , s ( ξ ) = D i , d t ( ξ ) ∀ i , ∀ d , ∀ t , ∀ s , ∀ ξ - - - ( 2 )
- B e ( θ i e , d t , s ( ξ ) - θ j e , d t , s ( ξ ) ) ≤ - f e , d t , s ( ξ ) - M e ( 1 - x e t + h ~ e s ) ∀ e , ∀ d , ∀ t , ∀ s , ∀ ξ - - - ( 3 )
B e ( θ i e , d t , s ( ξ ) - θ j e , d t , s ( ξ ) ) ≤ f e , d t , s ( ξ ) + M e ( 1 - x e t + h ~ e s ) ∀ e , ∀ d , ∀ t , ∀ s , ∀ ξ - - - ( 4 )
- f ‾ e s x e t ( 1 - h ~ e s ) ≤ f e , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ f ‾ e s x e t ( 1 - h ~ e s ) ∀ e , ∀ d , ∀ t , ∀ s , ∀ ξ - - - ( 5 )
0 ≤ p g , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ p ‾ g t ∀ g , ∀ d , ∀ t , ∀ s , ∀ ξ - - - ( 6 )
σ · Σ w p ‾ w , d t ( ξ ) ≤ Σ w p w , d t , s ( ξ ) ∀ d , ∀ t , s ∈ S 0 , ∀ ξ ∈ Λ - - - ( 7 )
0 ≤ p w , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ p ‾ w , d t ( ξ ) ∀ w , ∀ d , ∀ t , ∀ s ∈ S , ∀ ξ - - - ( 7 )
0 ≤ q i , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ D i , d t ( ξ ) ∀ i , ∀ d , ∀ t , ∀ s , ∀ ξ - - - ( 9 )
Σ i ∈ B q i , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ ϵ | s | D d t ( ξ ) ∀ s , ∀ d , ∀ t , ∀ ξ ∈ Λ - - - ( 10 )
x e t = 1 ∀ e ∈ E 0 , ∀ t - - - ( 11 )
x e t - 1 ≤ x e t , x e t ∈ { 0 , 1 } ∀ e ∈ E \ E 0 , ∀ t - - - ( 12 )
wherein r ist-1The swelling rate in the t-1 year is shown, t is 1,2, …, NT and NT show the planned years; e denotes the set of all lines, E0Representing an existing set of lines;indicating the state of the line e in the t year; ND represents the number of load time segments divided per year, d is 1,2, …, ND; Δ d represents the number of hours per time period; cgRepresents the power generation cost of the generator G, G is 1,2, … and Gt,GtRepresents the generator set of the t year;denotes a calculated expected value, ξ denotes samples of random variables, and ξ∈ xi, xi denote a set of samples of all random variables;representing the generated power of the generator G under a sample ξ when the generator G normally operates in the tth period of the yeari,tRepresenting a set of generators at node i of the t year;representing the power generation power of the generator g under the accident s and the sample ξ in the tth period of the t year·iRepresenting a set of lines ending in node i, ERepresenting a line set with a starting end as a node i;represents the transmission power of line e at the d-th time period of the year, incident s, sample ξ;represents the generated power of renewable energy source W under the d-th time period accident s and the sample ξ in the t year, wherein W is 1,2, … and Wi,t,Wi,tRepresenting a set of renewable energy sources on node i in the t year;representing the load shedding amount of node i at the tth period accident s, sample ξ in the t year;representing the load on node i at the d-th time period of year t, sample ξ, BeRepresents the reactance of line e; i.e. ieAnd jeRespectively representing a starting node and a tail end node of a line e;represents the initial node i under the d period accident s and the sample ξ in the t yeareThe phase angle of (d);represents the end node j under the d period accident s, sample ξ of the t yeareThe phase angle of (d); meRepresents a constant;indicating the state of the line e under the accident s,taking 0 indicates normal operation, which takes1 represents exiting the run;represents the maximum capacity of line e under accident s;representing the power generation capacity of the generator g in the t year;the method comprises the steps of obtaining a total power of renewable energy sources w under a sample ξ in the ith time period of the t year, wherein the total power is the maximum power generation power of the renewable energy sources w under the sample ξ;|s|indicating the allowable load shedding proportion under the accident s; s represents all accident sets; s0Λ denotes a given sample set of random variables, ξ∈Λ;representing the load under the sample ξ at the d-th period of the year t, B representing the set of nodes, inveRepresents the annual investment cost of line e, expressed as:
inve=Ce·r(1+r)y/((1+r)y-1)(13)
wherein, CeRepresents the total investment cost of the line e, r represents the percent swelling, and y represents the line cost recovery years.
In the step 2, the selection of the power grid operation scene comprises the following two conditions:
1) under the conditions of large load and small power generation power of renewable energy sources, the power grid can output the traditional power generation power to the load;
2) when the load is large and the power generated by the renewable energy source is large, the power grid can transmit the power generated by the renewable energy source to the load.
In the step 3, the power grid planning stage is firstly decomposed into a power grid planning main stage and a power grid planning sub-stage by adopting a Benders decomposition method, and the power grid planning mathematical model is solved in the power grid planning main stage and the power grid planning sub-stage respectively.
Solving the power grid planning mathematical model in the main power grid planning stage, wherein the solving comprises the following steps:
the objective function f is used for minimizing the sum of the line investment cost and the expected operation cost in the main stage of power grid planning1Expressed as:
min f 1 = Σ t = 1 N T r t - 1 Σ e ∈ E ( x e t - x e t - 1 ) C e - - - ( 14 )
wherein,representing the state of the line e in the t-1 year;
objective function f1The corresponding constraints are equations (11) and (12).
In a power grid planning sub-stage, according to different accident quantities, the sub-stage of power grid planning is divided into k +1 classes, wherein s is 0,1,2, …, k and k represent the level of N-k safety check to be considered; the following two cases are specifically distinguished:
1) dividing SP-0 into SP-0(t, d, ξ), and taking the minimum sum of load shedding amount and renewable energy utilization amount as the target function f2Expressed as:
M i n f 2 = Σ i ∈ B q i , d t , 0 ( ξ ) + j d t ( ξ ) - - - ( 15 )
objective function f2The corresponding constraints are as follows:
Σ g ∈ G i , t p g , d t , 0 ( ξ ) + Σ e ∈ E · i f e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) - Σ e ∈ E i · f e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) + Σ w ∈ W i , t p w , d t , 0 ( ξ ) + q i , d t , 0 ( ξ ) = D i , d t ( ξ ) ∀ i - - - ( 16 )
- B e ( θ i e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) - θ j e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) ) ≤ - f e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) - M e ( 1 - x ~ e t ) ∀ e - - - ( 17 )
B e ( θ i e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) - θ j e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) ) ≤ f e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) + M e ( 1 - x ~ e t ) ∀ e - - - ( 18 )
f e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) ≤ f ‾ e 0 x ~ e t ∀ e - - - ( 19 )
- f e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) ≤ f ‾ e 0 x ~ e t ∀ e - - - ( 20 )
0 ≤ p g , d t , 0 ( ξ ) ≤ p ‾ g t ∀ g - - - ( 21 )
σ · Σ w p ‾ w , d t , 0 ( ξ ) ≤ Σ w p w , d t , 0 ( ξ ) + j d t ( ξ ) - - - ( 22 )
wherein,indicating node ξ under sample operating normally during the tth period of timei load shedding amount;representing the amount of renewable energy w utilization at sample ξ for normal operation at the tth period of time in year t;represents the transmission power at sample ξ for line e operating normally during the tth period of the year;represents the generated power of renewable energy source w under sample ξ in the normal operation of the tth time period of the t year;represents the starting node i under the sample ξ for the d period of normal operation in the t yeareThe phase angle of (d);represents the end node j under sample ξ for the d-th period of the t-th year in normal operationeThe phase angle of (d);representing the state of a circuit e in the t year in power grid planning;represents the maximum capacity of line e for normal operation;represents the maximum generated power of the renewable energy source w under the sample ξ in the ith time period of the t year;
2) when the power grid is in an accident state, | s | ═ k, recorded as SP-k, and dividing SP-k intoTarget function f with minimum load shedding amount as target3Expressed as:
M i n f 3 = Σ i ∈ B q i , d t , s ( ξ ) - - - ( 23 )
objective function f3The corresponding constraints are as follows:
Σ g ∈ G i , t p g , d t , s ( ξ ) + Σ e ∈ E · i f e , d t , s ( ξ ) - Σ e ∈ E i · f e , d t , s ( ξ ) + Σ w ∈ W i , t p w , d t , s ( ξ ) + q i , d t , s ( ξ ) = D i , d t ( ξ ) ∀ i - - - ( 24 )
- B e ( θ i e , d t , s ( ξ ) - θ j e , d t , s ( ξ ) ) ≤ - f e , d t , s ( ξ ) - M e ( 1 - x e t + h ~ e s ) ∀ e - - - ( 25 )
B e ( θ i e , d t , s ( ξ ) - θ j e , d t , s ( ξ ) ) ≤ f e , d t , s ( ξ ) + M e ( 1 - x e t + h ~ e s ) ∀ e - - - ( 26 )
f e , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ f ‾ e s x e e ( 1 - h ~ e s ) ∀ e - - - ( 27 )
- f e , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ f ‾ e s x e t ( 1 - h ~ e s ) ∀ e - - - ( 28 )
0 ≤ p g , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ p ‾ g t ∀ g - - - ( 29 )
0 ≤ p w , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ p ‾ w , d t ∀ w - - - ( 30 )
0 ≤ q i , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ D i , d t ∀ i - - - ( 31 )
wherein,represents the maximum generated power of the renewable energy source w in the d-th time period of the t year;representing the load on node i at the d-th time period of year t.
The step 4 specifically comprises the following steps:
step 4-1: load shedding and renewable energy utilization rate verification are carried out; the method specifically comprises the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps that SP-0(t, d, xi) exists in a normal operation state of a power grid, if the sum of load shedding amount and renewable energy utilization amount is larger than 0 in the normal operation state of the power grid, it is indicated that the load shedding amount and the renewable energy utilization amount do not reach a corresponding proportion, namely the load shedding amount and the renewable energy utilization rate do not pass verification;
step 4-2: carrying out N-k security check; the method specifically comprises the following steps:
in the event of an accident in the power grid, there areAnd if the minimum load capacity of the power grid in the accident state is larger than the allowed load shedding capacity, the N-k safety check is not passed.
The step 5 specifically comprises the following steps:
step 5-1: setting the iteration number ll to 0 and setting the power gridRun cost estimate at the ll-th iteration in the planning sub-phaseIs 0;
step 5-2, selecting samples ξ of N random variables12,...,ξN
Step 5-3: increasing the iteration number ll +1, and calculating the minimum value z of the sum of the construction cost and the expected operation cost, wherein the minimum value z comprises the following steps:
wherein,representing the estimated value of the operation cost in the ll-1 iteration in the sub-stage of the power grid planning, c representing the line construction cost, cTDenotes the transpose of c, x denotes the variable; intermediate volume Represents n1A line state set of stages, wherein A represents a matrix and b represents a vector;
then updating the line state xllSetting a lower limit z of zl
Step 5-4, from ξ12,...,ξNIn which samples ξ of M random variables are selected12,...,ξMFor the current solution xll∈% for calculating the function in the network planning sub-stageThe corresponding constraint condition is Tx + Wy ═ h, wherein q and h are vectors, and q isTThe transpose of q is represented by,w, T is matrix, y is variable, and y is more than or equal to 0;
recording function in power grid planning sub-phaseThe optimal solution under the samples of different random variables is thetajAnd is andyjdenotes the j-th variable, j-1, 2, …, M,denotes qjTranspose of (q)jRepresents the jth vector;
calculating the upper limit z of zuAnd standard deviation σuThe method comprises the following steps:
z u = c T x + 1 M Σ j = 1 M θ j - - - ( 33 )
σ u = 1 M Σ j = 1 M ( c T x + θ j ) 2 - z u 2 - - - ( 34 )
if it is notIf true, stopping forward estimation, wherein gammaα/2Quantile of (1- α) for a standard normal distribution;
step 5-5: backward estimation, including:
for the current solution xll∈ χ, and optionally ξ ═ ξjj 1.. N, calculating a function in a network planning sub-stageAnd a functionDual function of (2) The corresponding constraint is Tx + Wy-h,corresponding constraint is WTPi is less than or equal to q, pi, h and q represent vectors, piTTranspose of π, W, T TableDisplay matrix, WTIs the transposition of W, y is variable and is more than or equal to 0;
in the sub-stage of power grid planningAndare respectively solved asAnd represents TjTranspose of (1), TjDenotes the jth vector, πjRepresents the jth vector;
make an intermediate amountIntermediate volume ρ l l ( x - x l l ) = - 1 N Σ j = 1 N T j T π j , ComputingComprises the following steps:
and returning to the step 5-3.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the beneficial effects that:
1) the invention considers the load uncertainty and the renewable energy uncertainty, and considers the renewable energy utilization rate, so that the planning scheme can meet the renewable energy access requirement;
2) the feasibility of power grid planning under different scenes is considered, so that the planning scheme has high robustness;
3) according to the method, N-k safety check is comprehensively considered, so that a planning scheme can meet the requirement of safe operation;
4) the method adopts an SDDP theory to establish a power grid planning mathematical model under the uncertain condition;
5) the method adopts a Bender decomposition method to solve the power grid planning mathematical model, and reduces the solving difficulty.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a mathematical model for optimizing power grid planning using stochastic dual dynamics theory according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The present invention will be described in further detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The invention provides a power grid planning method based on a random dual dynamic theory, which comprises the following steps:
step 1: establishing a power grid planning mathematical model;
step 2: selecting a power grid operation scene;
and step 3: solving a power grid planning mathematical model;
and 4, step 4: checking a power grid operation scene;
and 5: and optimizing a power grid planning mathematical model by adopting a random dual dynamic theory.
In the step 1, the uncertainty of the load and the renewable energy is considered, a power grid planning mathematical model is established by taking the sum of the line investment cost and the expected operation cost as a target, and an objective function F is expressed as:
the corresponding constraints of the objective function F are as follows:
Σ g ∈ G i , t p g , d t , s ( ξ ) + Σ e ∈ E · i f e , d t , s ( ξ ) - Σ e ∈ E i · f e , d t , s ( ξ ) + Σ w ∈ W i , t p w , d t , s ( ξ ) + q i , d t , s ( ξ ) = D i , d t ( ξ ) ∀ i , ∀ d , ∀ t , ∀ s , ∀ ξ - - - ( 2 )
- B e ( θ i e , d t , s ( ξ ) - θ j e , d t , s ( ξ ) ) ≤ - f e , d t , s ( ξ ) - M e ( 1 - x e t + h ~ e s ) ∀ e , ∀ d , ∀ t , ∀ s , ∀ ξ - - - ( 3 )
B e ( θ i e , d t , s ( ξ ) - θ j e , d t , s ( ξ ) ) ≤ f e , d t , s ( ξ ) + M e ( 1 - x e t + h ~ e s ) ∀ e , ∀ d , ∀ t , ∀ s , ∀ ξ - - - ( 4 )
- f ‾ e s x e t ( 1 - h ~ e s ) ≤ f e , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ f ‾ e s x e t ( 1 - h ~ e s ) ∀ e , ∀ d , ∀ t , ∀ s , ∀ ξ - - - ( 5 )
0 ≤ p g , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ p ‾ g t ∀ g , ∀ d , ∀ t , ∀ s , ∀ ξ - - - ( 6 )
σ · Σ w p ‾ w , d t ( ξ ) ≤ Σ w p w , d t , s ( ξ ) ∀ d , ∀ t , s ∈ S 0 , ∀ ξ ∈ Λ - - - ( 7 )
0 ≤ p w , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ p ‾ w , d t ( ξ ) ∀ w , ∀ d , ∀ t , ∀ s ∈ S , ∀ ξ - - - ( 8 )
0 ≤ q i , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ D i , d t ( ξ ) ∀ i , ∀ d , ∀ t , ∀ s , ∀ ξ - - - ( 9 )
Σ i ∈ B q i , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ ϵ | s | D d t ( ξ ) ∀ s , ∀ d , ∀ t , ∀ ξ ∈ Λ - - - ( 10 )
x e t = 1 ∀ e ∈ E 0 , ∀ t - - - ( 11 )
x e t - 1 ≤ x e t , x e t ∈ { 0 , 1 } ∀ e ∈ E \ E 0 , ∀ t - - - ( 12 )
wherein r ist-1The swelling rate in the t-1 year is shown, t is 1,2, …, NT and NT show the planned years; e denotes the set of all lines, E0Representing an existing set of lines;indicating the state of the line e in the t year; ND represents the number of load time segments divided per year, d is 1,2, …, ND; Δ d represents the number of hours per time period; cgRepresents the power generation cost of the generator G, G is 1,2, … and Gt,GtRepresents the generator set of the t year;denotes a calculated expected value, ξ denotes samples of random variables, and ξ∈ xi, xi denote a set of samples of all random variables;representing the generated power of the generator G under a sample ξ when the generator G normally operates in the tth period of the yeari,tRepresenting a set of generators at node i of the t year;representing the power generation power of the generator g under the accident s and the sample ξ in the tth period of the t year·iRepresenting a set of lines ending in node i, ERepresenting a line set with a starting end as a node i;represents the transmission power of line e at the d-th time period of the year, incident s, sample ξ;represents the generated power of renewable energy source W under the d-th time period accident s and the sample ξ in the t year, wherein W is 1,2, … and Wi,t,Wi,tRepresenting a set of renewable energy sources on node i in the t year;representing the load shedding amount of node i at the tth period accident s, sample ξ in the t year;representing the load on node i at the d-th time period of year t, sample ξ, BeRepresents the reactance of line e; i.e. ieAnd jeRespectively representing a starting node and a tail end node of a line e;represents the initial node i under the d period accident s and the sample ξ in the t yeareThe phase angle of (d);represents the end node j under the d period accident s, sample ξ of the t yeareThe phase angle of (d); meRepresents a constant;indicating the state of the line e under the accident s,taking 0 for normal operation and 1 for quitting operation;represents the maximum capacity of line e under accident s;representing the power generation capacity of the generator g in the t year;the method comprises the steps of obtaining a total power of renewable energy sources w under a sample ξ in the ith time period of the t year, wherein the total power is the maximum power generation power of the renewable energy sources w under the sample ξ;|s|indicating the allowable load shedding proportion under the accident s; s represents all accident sets; s0Λ denotes a given sample set of random variables, ξ∈Λ;represents the load at sample ξ at the tth time period of year t;b represents a node set; inveRepresents the annual investment cost of line e, expressed as:
inve=Ce·r(1+r)y/((1+r)y-1)(13)
wherein, CeRepresents the total investment cost of the line e, r represents the percent swelling, and y represents the line cost recovery years.
In the step 2, the selection of the power grid operation scene comprises the following two conditions:
1) under the conditions of large load and small power generation power of renewable energy sources, the power grid can output the traditional power generation power to the load;
2) when the load is large and the power generated by the renewable energy source is large, the power grid can transmit the power generated by the renewable energy source to the load.
In the step 3, the power grid planning stage is firstly decomposed into a power grid planning main stage and a power grid planning sub-stage by adopting a Benders decomposition method, and the power grid planning mathematical model is solved in the power grid planning main stage and the power grid planning sub-stage respectively.
Solving the power grid planning mathematical model in the main power grid planning stage, wherein the solving comprises the following steps:
the objective function f is used for minimizing the sum of the line investment cost and the expected operation cost in the main stage of power grid planning1Expressed as:
min f 1 = Σ t = 1 N T r t - 1 Σ e ∈ E ( x e t - x e t - 1 ) C e - - - ( 14 )
wherein,representing the state of the line e in the t-1 year;
objective function f1The corresponding constraints are equations (11) and (12).
In a power grid planning sub-stage, according to different accident quantities, the sub-stage of power grid planning is divided into k +1 classes, wherein s is 0,1,2, …, k and k represent the level of N-k safety check to be considered; the following two cases are specifically distinguished:
1) under the normal operation state of the power grid, | s | ═ 0, marked as SP-0, and load shedding and the utilization rate of renewable energy can meet the requirements under the given scene needing to be verified; will be provided withSP-0 is divided into SP-0(t, d, ξ), and the objective function f is used to minimize the sum of load shedding amount and renewable energy utilization amount2Expressed as:
M i n f 2 = Σ i ∈ B q i , d t , 0 ( ξ ) + j d t ( ξ ) - - - ( 15 )
objective function f2The corresponding constraints are as follows:
Σ g ∈ G i , t p g , d t , 0 ( ξ ) + Σ e ∈ E · i f e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) - Σ e ∈ E i · f e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) + Σ w ∈ W i , t p w , d t , 0 ( ξ ) + q i , d t , 0 ( ξ ) = D i , d t ( ξ ) ∀ i - - - ( 16 )
- B e ( θ i e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) - θ j e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) ) ≤ - f e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) - M e ( 1 - x ~ e t ) ∀ e - - - ( 17 )
B e ( θ i e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) - θ j e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) ) ≤ f e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) + M e ( 1 - x ~ e t ) ∀ e - - - ( 18 )
f e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) ≤ f ‾ e 0 x ~ e t ∀ e - - - ( 19 )
- f e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) ≤ f ‾ e 0 x ~ e t ∀ e - - - ( 20 )
0 ≤ p g , d t , 0 ( ξ ) ≤ p ‾ g t ∀ g - - - ( 21 )
σ · Σ w p ‾ w , d t , 0 ( ξ ) ≤ Σ w p w , d t , 0 ( ξ ) + j d t ( ξ ) - - - ( 22 )
wherein,represents the load shedding amount of node i under sample ξ for the normal operation at the tth period in the t year;representing the amount of renewable energy w utilization at sample ξ for normal operation at the tth period of time in year t;represents the transmission power at sample ξ for line e operating normally during the tth period of the year;represents the generated power of renewable energy source w under sample ξ in the normal operation of the tth time period of the t year;represents the starting node i under the sample ξ for the d period of normal operation in the t yeareThe phase angle of (d);indicating that the d th period of the t year is positiveEnd node j under constant run, sample ξeThe phase angle of (d);representing the state of a circuit e in the t year in power grid planning;represents the maximum capacity of line e for normal operation;represents the maximum generated power of the renewable energy source w under the sample ξ in the ith time period of the t year;
2) when the power grid is in an accident state, | s | ═ k, recorded as SP-k, and dividing SP-k intoTarget function f with minimum load shedding amount as target3Expressed as:
M i n f 3 = Σ i ∈ B q i , d t , s ( ξ ) - - - ( 23 )
objective function f3The corresponding constraints are as follows:
Σ g ∈ G i , t p g , d t , s ( ξ ) + Σ e ∈ E · i f e , d t , s ( ξ ) - Σ e ∈ E i · f e , d t , s ( ξ ) + Σ w ∈ W i , t p w , d t , s ( ξ ) + q i , d t , s ( ξ ) = D i , d t ( ξ ) ∀ i - - - ( 24 )
- B e ( θ i e , d t , s ( ξ ) - θ j e , d t , s ( ξ ) ) ≤ - f e , d t , s ( ξ ) - M e ( 1 - x e t + h ~ e s ) ∀ e - - - ( 25 )
B e ( θ i e , d t , s ( ξ ) - θ j e , d t , s ( ξ ) ) ≤ f e , d t , s ( ξ ) + M e ( 1 - x e t + h ~ e s ) ∀ e - - - ( 26 )
f e , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ f ‾ e s x e e ( 1 - h ~ e s ) ∀ e - - - ( 27 )
- f e , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ f ‾ e s x e t ( 1 - h ~ e s ) ∀ e - - - ( 28 )
0 ≤ p g , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ p ‾ g t ∀ g - - - ( 29 )
0 ≤ p w , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ p ‾ w , d t ∀ w - - - ( 30 )
0 ≤ q i , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ D i , d t ∀ i - - - ( 31 )
wherein,represents the maximum generated power of the renewable energy source w in the d-th time period of the t year;representing the load on node i at the d-th time period of year t.
The step 4 specifically comprises the following steps:
step 4-1: load shedding and renewable energy utilization rate verification are carried out; the method specifically comprises the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps that SP-0(t, d, xi) exists in a normal operation state of a power grid, if the sum of load shedding amount and renewable energy utilization amount is larger than 0 in the normal operation state of the power grid, it is indicated that the load shedding amount and the renewable energy utilization amount do not reach a corresponding proportion, namely the load shedding amount and the renewable energy utilization rate do not pass verification;
step 4-2: carrying out N-k security check; the method specifically comprises the following steps:
in the event of an accident in the power grid, there areAnd if the minimum load capacity of the power grid in the accident state is larger than the allowed load shedding capacity, the N-k safety check is not passed.
As shown in fig. 1, the step 5 specifically includes the following steps:
step 5-1: setting the iteration number ll to be 0, and setting the estimated value of the running cost in the ll iteration in the sub-stage of the power grid planningIs 0;
step 5-2, selecting samples ξ of N random variables12,...,ξN
Step 5-3: increasing the iteration number ll +1, and calculating the minimum value z of the sum of the construction cost and the expected operation cost, wherein the minimum value z comprises the following steps:
wherein,representing the estimated value of the operation cost in the ll-1 iteration in the sub-stage of the power grid planning, c representing the line construction cost, cTDenotes the transposition of c, x denotes the variationAn amount; intermediate volume Represents n1A line state set of stages, wherein A represents a matrix and b represents a vector;
then updating the line state xllSetting a lower limit z of zl
Step 5-4: forward estimation, including:
from ξ12,...,ξNIn which samples ξ of M random variables are selected12,...,ξMFor the current solution xll∈% for calculating the function in the network planning sub-stageThe corresponding constraint condition is Tx + Wy ═ h, wherein q and h are vectors, and q isTRepresenting the transposition of q, wherein W, T is a matrix, y is a variable and is more than or equal to 0;
recording function in power grid planning sub-phaseThe optimal solution under the samples of different random variables is thetajAnd is andyjdenotes the j-th variable, j-1, 2, …, M,denotes qjTranspose of (q)jRepresents the jth vector;
calculating the upper limit z of zuAnd standard deviation σuThe method comprises the following steps:
z u = c T x + 1 M Σ j = 1 M θ j - - - ( 33 )
σ u = 1 M Σ j = 1 M ( c T x + θ j ) 2 - z u 2 - - - ( 34 )
if it is notIf true, stopping forward estimation, wherein gammaα/2Quantile of (1- α) for a standard normal distribution;
step 5-5: backward estimation, including:
for the current solution xll∈ χ, and optionally ξ ═ ξjj 1.. N, calculating a function in a network planning sub-stageAnd a functionDual function of (2) The corresponding constraint is Tx + Wy-h,corresponding constraint is WTPi is less than or equal to q, pi, h and q represent vectors, piTIs a transposition of π, W, T denotes the matrix, WTIs the transposition of W, y is variable and is more than or equal to 0;
in the sub-stage of power grid planningAndare respectively solved asAnd represents TjTranspose of (1), TjDenotes the jth vector, πjRepresents the jth vector;
make an intermediate amountIntermediate volume ρ l l ( x - x l l ) = - 1 N Σ j = 1 N T j T π j , ComputingComprises the following steps:
and returning to the step 5-3.
Finally, it should be noted that: the above embodiments are only intended to illustrate the technical solution of the present invention and not to limit the same, and a person of ordinary skill in the art can make modifications or equivalents to the specific embodiments of the present invention with reference to the above embodiments, and such modifications or equivalents without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention are within the scope of the claims of the present invention as set forth in the claims.

Claims (8)

1. A power grid planning method based on a random dual dynamic theory is characterized in that: the method comprises the following steps:
step 1: establishing a power grid planning mathematical model;
step 2: selecting a power grid operation scene;
and step 3: solving a power grid planning mathematical model;
and 4, step 4: checking a power grid operation scene;
and 5: and optimizing a power grid planning mathematical model by adopting a random dual dynamic theory.
2. The power grid planning method based on the stochastic dual dynamics theory according to claim 1, wherein: in the step 1, the uncertainty of the load and the renewable energy is considered, a power grid planning mathematical model is established by taking the sum of the line investment cost and the expected operation cost as a target, and an objective function F is expressed as:
the corresponding constraints of the objective function F are as follows:
Σ g ∈ G i , t p g , d t , s ( ξ ) + Σ e ∈ E · i f e , d t , s ( ξ ) - Σ e ∈ E i · f e , d t , s ( ξ ) + Σ w ∈ W i , t p w , d t , s ( ξ ) + q i , d t , s ( ξ ) = D i , d t ( ξ ) ∀ i , ∀ d , ∀ t , ∀ s , ∀ ξ - - - ( 2 )
- B e ( θ i e , d t , s ( ξ ) - θ j e , d t , s ( ξ ) ) ≤ - f e , d t , s ( ξ ) - M e ( 1 - x e t + h ~ e s ) ∀ e , ∀ d , ∀ t , ∀ s , ∀ ξ - - - ( 3 )
B e ( θ i e , d t , s ( ξ ) - θ j e , d t , s ( ξ ) ) ≤ f e , d t , s ( ξ ) + M e ( 1 - x e t + h ~ e s ) ∀ e , ∀ d , ∀ t , ∀ s , ∀ ξ - - - ( 4 )
- f ‾ e s x e t ( 1 - h ~ e s ) ≤ f e , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ f ‾ e s x e t ( 1 - h ~ e s ) ∀ e , ∀ d , ∀ t , ∀ s , ∀ ξ - - - ( 5 )
0 ≤ p g , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ p ‾ g t ∀ g , ∀ d , ∀ t , ∀ s , ∀ ξ - - - ( 6 )
σ · Σ w p ‾ w , d t ( ξ ) ≤ Σ w p w , d t , s ( ξ ) ∀ d , ∀ t , s ∈ S 0 , ∀ ξ ∈ Λ - - - ( 7 )
0 ≤ p w , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ p ‾ w , d t ( ξ ) ∀ w , ∀ d , ∀ t , ∀ s ∈ S , ∀ ξ - - - ( 8 )
0 ≤ q i , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ D i , d t ( ξ ) ∀ i , ∀ d , ∀ t , ∀ s , ∀ ξ - - - ( 9 )
Σ i ∈ B q i , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ ϵ | s | D d t ( ξ ) ∀ s , ∀ d , ∀ t , ∀ ξ ∈ Λ - - - ( 10 )
x e t = 1 ∀ e ∈ E 0 , ∀ t - - - ( 11 )
x e t - 1 ≤ x e t , x e t ∈ { 0 , 1 } ∀ e ∈ E \ E 0 , ∀ t - - - ( 12 )
wherein r ist-1The swelling rate in the t-1 year is shown, t is 1,2, …, NT and NT show the planned years; e denotes the set of all lines, E0Representing an existing set of lines;indicating the state of the line e in the t year; ND represents the number of load time segments divided per year, d is 1,2, …, ND; Δ d represents the number of hours per time period; cgRepresents the power generation cost of the generator G, G is 1,2, … and Gt,GtRepresents the generator set of the t year;denotes a calculated expected value, ξ denotes samples of random variables, and ξ∈ xi, xi denote a set of samples of all random variables;representing the generated power of the generator G under a sample ξ when the generator G normally operates in the tth period of the yeari,tRepresenting a set of generators at node i of the t year;representing the power generation power of the generator g under the accident s and the sample ξ in the tth period of the t year·iRepresenting a set of lines ending in node i, ERepresenting a line set with a starting end as a node i;represents the transmission power of line e at the d-th time period of the year, incident s, sample ξ;represents the generated power of renewable energy source W under the d-th time period accident s and the sample ξ in the t year, wherein W is 1,2, … and Wi,t,Wi,tRepresenting a set of renewable energy sources on node i in the t year;representing the load shedding amount of node i at the tth period accident s, sample ξ in the t year;representing the load on node i at the d-th time period of year t, sample ξ, BeRepresents the reactance of line e; i.e. ieAnd jeRespectively representing a starting node and a tail end node of a line e;represents the initial node i under the d period accident s and the sample ξ in the t yeareThe phase angle of (d);represents the end node j under the d period accident s, sample ξ of the t yeareThe phase angle of (d); meRepresents a constant;indicating the state of the line e under the accident s,taking 0 for normal operation and 1 for quitting operation;represents the maximum capacity of line e under accident s;representing the power generation capacity of the generator g in the t year;the method comprises the steps of obtaining a total power of renewable energy sources w under a sample ξ in the ith time period of the t year, wherein the total power is the maximum power generation power of the renewable energy sources w under the sample ξ;|s|indicating the allowable load shedding proportion under the accident s; s represents all accident sets; s0Λ denotes a given sample set of random variables, ξ∈Λ;representing the load under the sample ξ at the d-th period of the year t, B representing the set of nodes, inveRepresents the annual investment cost of line e, expressed as:
inve=Ce·r(1+r)y/((1+r)y-1)(13)
wherein, CeRepresents the total investment cost of the line e, r represents the percent swelling, and y represents the line cost recovery years.
3. The power grid planning method based on the stochastic dual dynamics theory according to claim 2, wherein: in the step 2, the selection of the power grid operation scene comprises the following two conditions:
1) under the conditions of large load and small power generation power of renewable energy sources, the power grid can output the traditional power generation power to the load;
2) when the load is large and the power generated by the renewable energy source is large, the power grid can transmit the power generated by the renewable energy source to the load.
4. The power grid planning method based on the stochastic dual dynamics theory according to claim 3, wherein: in the step 3, the power grid planning stage is firstly decomposed into a power grid planning main stage and a power grid planning sub-stage by adopting a Benders decomposition method, and the power grid planning mathematical model is solved in the power grid planning main stage and the power grid planning sub-stage respectively.
5. The power grid planning method based on the stochastic dual dynamics theory according to claim 4, wherein: solving the power grid planning mathematical model in the main power grid planning stage, wherein the solving comprises the following steps:
the objective function f is used for minimizing the sum of the line investment cost and the expected operation cost in the main stage of power grid planning1Expressed as:
min f 1 = Σ t = 1 N T r t - 1 Σ e ∈ E ( x e t - x e t - 1 ) C e - - - ( 14 )
wherein,representing the state of the line e in the t-1 year;
objective function f1The corresponding constraints are equations (11) and (12).
6. The power grid planning method based on the stochastic dual dynamics theory according to claim 5, wherein: in a power grid planning sub-stage, according to different accident quantities, the sub-stage of power grid planning is divided into k +1 classes, wherein s is 0,1,2, …, k and k represent the level of N-k safety check to be considered; the following two cases are specifically distinguished:
1) dividing SP-0 into SP-0(t, d, ξ), and taking the minimum sum of load shedding amount and renewable energy utilization amount as the target function f2Expressed as:
M i n f 2 = Σ i ∈ B q i , d t , 0 ( ξ ) + j d t ( ξ ) - - - ( 15 )
objective function f2The corresponding constraints are as follows:
Σ g ∈ G i , t p g , d t , 0 ( ξ ) + Σ e ∈ E · i f e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) - Σ e ∈ E i · f e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) + Σ w ∈ W i , t p w , d t , 0 ( ξ ) + q i , d t , 0 ( ξ ) = D i , d t ( ξ ) ∀ i - - - ( 16 )
- B e ( θ i e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) - θ j e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) ) ≤ - f e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) - M e ( 1 - x ~ e t ) ∀ e - - - ( 17 )
B e ( θ i e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) - θ j e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) ) ≤ f e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) + M e ( 1 - x ~ e t ) ∀ e - - - ( 18 )
f e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) ≤ f ‾ e 0 x ~ e t ∀ e - - - ( 19 )
- f e , d t , 0 ( ξ ) ≤ f ‾ e 0 x ~ e t ∀ e - - - ( 20 )
0 ≤ p g , d t , 0 ( ξ ) ≤ p ‾ g t ∀ g - - - ( 21 )
σ · Σ w p ‾ w , d t , 0 ( ξ ) ≤ Σ w p w , d t , 0 ( ξ ) + j d t ( ξ ) - - - ( 22 )
wherein,represents the load shedding amount of node i under sample ξ for the normal operation at the tth period in the t year;representing the amount of renewable energy w utilization at sample ξ for normal operation at the tth period of time in year t;represents the transmission power at sample ξ for line e operating normally during the tth period of the year;represents the generated power of renewable energy source w under sample ξ in the normal operation of the tth time period of the t year;represents the starting node i under the sample ξ for the d period of normal operation in the t yeareThe phase angle of (d);represents the end node j under sample ξ for the d-th period of the t-th year in normal operationeThe phase angle of (d);representing the state of a circuit e in the t year in power grid planning;represents the maximum capacity of line e for normal operation;represents the maximum generated power of the renewable energy source w under the sample ξ in the ith time period of the t year;
2) when the power grid is in an accident state, | s | ═ k, recorded as SP-k, and dividing SP-k intoTarget function f with minimum load shedding amount as target3Expressed as:
M i n f 3 = Σ i ∈ B q i , d t , s ( ξ ) - - - ( 23 )
objective function f3The corresponding constraints are as follows:
Σ g ∈ G i , t p g , d t , s ( ξ ) + Σ e ∈ E · i f e , d t , s ( ξ ) - Σ e ∈ E i · f e , d t , s ( ξ ) + Σ w ∈ W i , t p w , d t , s ( ξ ) + q i , d t , s ( ξ ) = D i , d t ( ξ ) ∀ i - - - ( 24 )
- B e ( θ i e , d t , s ( ξ ) - θ j e , d t , s ( ξ ) ) ≤ - f e , d t , s ( ξ ) - M e ( 1 - x e t + h ~ e s ) ∀ e - - - ( 25 )
B e ( θ i e , d t , s ( ξ ) - θ j e , d t , s ( ξ ) ) ≤ f e , d t , s ( ξ ) + M e ( 1 - x e t + h ~ e s ) ∀ e - - - ( 26 )
f e , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ f ‾ e s x e t ( 1 - h ~ e s ) ∀ e - - - ( 27 )
- f e , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ f ‾ e s x e t ( 1 - h ~ e s ) ∀ e - - - ( 28 )
0 ≤ p g , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ p ‾ g t ∀ g - - - ( 29 )
0 ≤ p w , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ p ‾ w , d t ∀ w - - - ( 30 )
0 ≤ q i , d t , s ( ξ ) ≤ D i , d t ∀ i - - - ( 31 )
wherein,represents the maximum generated power of the renewable energy source w in the d-th time period of the t year;representing the load on node i at the d-th time period of year t.
7. The power grid planning method based on the stochastic dual dynamics theory according to claim 6, wherein: the step 4 specifically comprises the following steps:
step 4-1: load shedding and renewable energy utilization rate verification are carried out; the method specifically comprises the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps that SP-0(t, d, xi) exists in a normal operation state of a power grid, if the sum of load shedding amount and renewable energy utilization amount is larger than 0 in the normal operation state of the power grid, it is indicated that the load shedding amount and the renewable energy utilization amount do not reach a corresponding proportion, namely the load shedding amount and the renewable energy utilization rate do not pass verification;
step 4-2: carrying out N-k security check; the method specifically comprises the following steps:
in the event of an accident in the power grid, there areAnd if the minimum load capacity of the power grid in the accident state is larger than the allowed load shedding capacity, the N-k safety check is not passed.
8. The power grid planning method based on the stochastic dual dynamics theory according to claim 1, wherein: the step 5 specifically comprises the following steps:
step 5-1: setting the iteration number ll to be 0, and setting the estimated value of the running cost in the ll iteration in the sub-stage of the power grid planningIs 0;
step 5-2, selecting samples ξ of N random variables12,...,ξN
Step 5-3: increasing the iteration number ll +1, and calculating the minimum value z of the sum of the construction cost and the expected operation cost, wherein the minimum value z comprises the following steps:
wherein,representing the estimated value of the operation cost in the ll-1 iteration in the sub-stage of the power grid planning, c representing the line construction cost, cTDenotes the transpose of c, x denotes the variable; intermediate volume Represents n1A line state set of stages, wherein A represents a matrix and b represents a vector;
then updating the line state xllSetting a lower limit z of zl
Step 5-4: forward estimation, including:
from ξ12,...,ξNIn which samples ξ of M random variables are selected12,...,ξMFor the current solution xll∈% for calculating the function in the network planning sub-stageThe corresponding constraint condition is Tx + Wy ═ h, wherein q and h are vectors, and q isTRepresenting the transposition of q, wherein W, T is a matrix, y is a variable and is more than or equal to 0;
recording function in power grid planning sub-phaseThe optimal solution under the samples of different random variables is thetajAnd isyjDenotes the j-th variable, j-1, 2, …,M,denotes qjTranspose of (q)jRepresents the jth vector;
calculating the upper limit z of zuAnd standard deviation σuThe method comprises the following steps:
z u = c T x + 1 M Σ j = 1 m θ j - - - ( 33 )
σ u = 1 M Σ j = 1 M ( c T x + θ j ) 2 - z u 2 - - - ( 34 )
if it is notIf true, stopping forward estimation, wherein gammaα/2Quantile of (1- α) for a standard normal distribution;
step 5-5: backward estimation, including:
for the current solution xll∈ χ, and optionally ξ ═ ξjj 1.. N, calculating a function in a network planning sub-stageAnd a functionDual function of (2) The corresponding constraint is Tx + Wy-h,corresponding constraint is WTPi is less than or equal to q, pi, h and q represent vectors, piTIs a transposition of π, W, T denotes the matrix, WTIs the transposition of W, y is variable and is more than or equal to 0;
in the sub-stage of power grid planningAndare respectively solved asAnd represents TjTranspose of (1), TjDenotes the jth vector, πjRepresents the jth vector;
make an intermediate amountIntermediate volume ρ l l ( x - x l l ) = - 1 N Σ j = 1 N T j T π j , ComputingComprises the following steps:
and returning to the step 5-3.
CN201510882815.1A 2015-12-04 2015-12-04 Grid planning method based on stochastic dual dynamic theory Pending CN105528674A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201510882815.1A CN105528674A (en) 2015-12-04 2015-12-04 Grid planning method based on stochastic dual dynamic theory

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201510882815.1A CN105528674A (en) 2015-12-04 2015-12-04 Grid planning method based on stochastic dual dynamic theory

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN105528674A true CN105528674A (en) 2016-04-27

Family

ID=55770887

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201510882815.1A Pending CN105528674A (en) 2015-12-04 2015-12-04 Grid planning method based on stochastic dual dynamic theory

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN105528674A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107528314A (en) * 2017-08-15 2017-12-29 东南大学 The power network robust planing method of safety check is considered under a kind of uncertain environment
CN111463809A (en) * 2020-02-28 2020-07-28 浙江工业大学 Light and electricity storage coordination control method considering source charge uncertainty

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101105820A (en) * 2007-08-23 2008-01-16 上海交通大学 Electrified wire netting layout computer auxiliary decision-making support system
CN101179196A (en) * 2007-11-15 2008-05-14 上海交通大学 Determined 2-layered planning model based transmission network planning method
US20130226358A1 (en) * 2012-02-24 2013-08-29 Aleksandr Rudkevich Power transmission switching

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101105820A (en) * 2007-08-23 2008-01-16 上海交通大学 Electrified wire netting layout computer auxiliary decision-making support system
CN101179196A (en) * 2007-11-15 2008-05-14 上海交通大学 Determined 2-layered planning model based transmission network planning method
US20130226358A1 (en) * 2012-02-24 2013-08-29 Aleksandr Rudkevich Power transmission switching

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
王秀丽 等: "基于多场景的风电场接入与输电网协调规划", 《电力建设》 *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107528314A (en) * 2017-08-15 2017-12-29 东南大学 The power network robust planing method of safety check is considered under a kind of uncertain environment
CN107528314B (en) * 2017-08-15 2019-11-05 东南大学 The power grid robust planing method of safety check is considered under a kind of uncertain environment
CN111463809A (en) * 2020-02-28 2020-07-28 浙江工业大学 Light and electricity storage coordination control method considering source charge uncertainty

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Velarde et al. On the comparison of stochastic model predictive control strategies applied to a hydrogen-based microgrid
CN107947164A (en) It is a kind of to consider multiple uncertain and correlation electric system Robust Scheduling method a few days ago
CN103065057B (en) A kind of electric system differentiation planning economic evaluation method
CN103995982A (en) Probability load flow calculation method considering unit random fault
Duan et al. A deep reinforcement learning based approach for optimal active power dispatch
Yan et al. Two-stage robust energy storage planning with probabilistic guarantees: A data-driven approach
Baker et al. Optimal integration of intermittent energy sources using distributed multi-step optimization
Hamon et al. An importance sampling technique for probabilistic security assessment in power systems with large amounts of wind power
CN105356465A (en) Economic efficiency and safety coordinating power transmission network planning platform and application
CN105529714A (en) Normal distribution combination characteristic-based rapid probabilistic power flow calculation method
Bo et al. A DNN-based reliability evaluation method for multi-state series-parallel systems considering semi-Markov process
Zhang et al. Short‐Term Power Prediction of Wind Power Generation System Based on Logistic Chaos Atom Search Optimization BP Neural Network
CN105528674A (en) Grid planning method based on stochastic dual dynamic theory
Aizpurua et al. Hybrid transformer prognostics framework for enhanced probabilistic predictions in renewable energy applications
Fu et al. Statistical machine learning model for uncertainty planning of distributed renewable energy sources in distribution networks
Li et al. Two-stage stochastic programming based model predictive control strategy for microgrid energy management under uncertainties
CN105354628A (en) Robust available power transmission capacity evaluation method for power transmission system
Li et al. Stochastic optimal power flow approach considering correlated probabilistic load and wind farm generation
Zhang et al. A novel point estimate method for probabilistic power flow considering correlated nodal power
CN104269886B (en) The method for calculating for wind-electricity integration power system capacity benefit nargin and distributing
CN106208136A (en) Meter and benefit and the dispatching method a few days ago containing uncertain wind-powered electricity generation of risk
Jiang et al. A Stochastic Online Forecast-and-Optimize Framework for Real-Time Energy Dispatch in Virtual Power Plants under Uncertainty
Chen et al. Chance-constrained DC optimal power flow with non-Gaussian distributed uncertainties
Hayes et al. Viable computation of the largest Lyapunov characteristic exponent for power systems
CN114204552A (en) Comprehensive energy scheduling method for intelligent park

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20160427

RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication