CN105335891A - Enterprise debt paying risk assessment method - Google Patents

Enterprise debt paying risk assessment method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN105335891A
CN105335891A CN201510757578.6A CN201510757578A CN105335891A CN 105335891 A CN105335891 A CN 105335891A CN 201510757578 A CN201510757578 A CN 201510757578A CN 105335891 A CN105335891 A CN 105335891A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
enterprise
debts
payment
value
credit
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201510757578.6A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
徐荣静
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hefei intellectual property Mdt InfoTech Ltd
Original Assignee
Anhui Rongxin Jinmo Information Technology Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Anhui Rongxin Jinmo Information Technology Co Ltd filed Critical Anhui Rongxin Jinmo Information Technology Co Ltd
Priority to CN201510757578.6A priority Critical patent/CN105335891A/en
Publication of CN105335891A publication Critical patent/CN105335891A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

The invention discloses an enterprise debt paying risk assessment method. Through comprehensively considering an enterprise debt paying credit threshold a, an enterprise reputation threshold b and an enterprise asset stability threshold c, enterprise credit can be precisely assessed; when a loan risk value w is calculated, a trend value lambda is introduced, and thus, the finally-acquired loan risk value w is more in line with the current enterprise condition, and a lender can make a more accurate judgment. Data for calculating the enterprise debt paying credit threshold a, the enterprise reputation threshold b and the enterprise asset stability threshold c are easy to acquire and hard to counterfeit, and risks brought by excessive dependence on low financial data authenticity when the enterprise financial data are used can be avoided.

Description

A kind of enterprise payment of debts methods of risk assessment
Technical field
The present invention relates to enterprise evaluation technical field, particularly relate to a kind of enterprise payment of debts methods of risk assessment.
Background technology
In China, a lot of Corporate finance is difficult, must by obtaining financing to pledging.Set up the To enterprises operational risk early-warning system groupware, be used for assisting financial institution to enterprise's credit decision-making and credit legal system, very necessary.The business risk assessment software of current widespread use, is all the basic data using the financial statement of enterprise as assessment, by these believable financial basic datas, is calculated the business circumstance of enterprise by wind control model.But a lot of enterprise especially medium-sized and small enterprises because of financial statement quality of information lower, the influence degree that Credit Risk Assessment of Enterprise is subject to business manager is high, and financial statement information credibility is lower, often has the situation that inside and outside account is inconsistent.Therefore traditional business risk forecast model is applied on medium-sized and small enterprises, certainly will have structural inclined mistake, cause predictive ability to reduce, and certainly will affect bank's credit according to survey, improves the credit risk of bank.
Summary of the invention
Based on the technical matters that background technology exists, the present invention proposes a kind of enterprise payment of debts methods of risk assessment.
A kind of enterprise payment of debts methods of risk assessment that the present invention proposes, comprises the following steps:
S1, setup times segmentation, obtain enterprise's payment of debts historical data of nearest multiple time slice, evaluates the enterprise payment of debts credit fragmentation value a in corresponding time slice according to the enterprise's payment of debts historical data in each time slice n;
S2, according to multiple enterprise payment of debts credit fragmentation value a ncalculate represent credit rating variation tendency move towards value λ, wherein, h 0for the time span value of time slice, η is computational constant, and meets λ≤1;
S3, according to multiple enterprise payment of debts credit fragmentation value a ncalculate enterprise's payment of debts credit threshold a in multiple time slice sum, a = Σ n = 1 a n / n ;
S4, obtain company-related information from internet, and relevant information is divided into positive information and negative report, then according to positive information and negative report occurrence number and the reliability weight occurring website, calculate corporate reputation threshold value b;
S5, the corporate financial information obtained on different time node, judge the total assets of the corresponding timing node of enterprise according to financial information, and according to the variation track of responsible official's total assets, assess enterprise assets degree of stability threshold value c;
S6, according to enterprise payment of debts credit threshold a, corporate reputation threshold value b and enterprise assets degree of stability threshold value c comprehensive descision business standing degree e;
S7, according to business standing degree e and move towards value λ calculate debt-credit value-at-risk w.
Preferably, step S1 is specially: count according to the enterprise's payment of debts historical data in each time slice and repay number of times A on schedule n, exceed the time limit to repay number of times B ndo not repay number of times C nthree kinds, and three class data importings are preset the first computation model calculating acquisition enterprise payment of debts credit fragmentation value a n; First computation model is:
A n=K 1a n+ K 2b n+ K 3c n 2, K 1, K 2and K 3be scale-up factor, wherein, K 1> 0, K 3< 0, K 3< K 2< K 1.
Preferably, in step S3, multiple time slice sum equals enterprise's establishment time or the incumbent responsible official of enterprise holds a post the time.
Preferably, in step S4, reputation threshold calculations model is:
wherein, n is the positive information quantity searched, δ nbe that a positive information is reprinted number of times, β nfor the reliability weight of website appears in described positive information first; M is the positive information quantity searched, α mbe that a negative report is reprinted number of times, ε mfor the reliability weight of website appears in described negative report first.
Preferably, step S5 is specially: obtain the corporate financial information on different time node, judges the total assets f of the corresponding timing node of enterprise according to financial information n, and Real-time Obtaining assets mean value f ave, enterprise assets degree of stability threshold value
Preferably, in step S6, the computing formula of business standing degree e is:
ω 1, ω 2and ω 3be computational constant, and desirable positive count value.
Preferably, in step S7, the computing formula of debt-credit value-at-risk w is: ω=(1+ λ) × e.
The present invention is by considering enterprise payment of debts credit threshold a, corporate reputation threshold value b and enterprise assets degree of stability threshold value c, business standing degree can be assessed accurately, when calculating debt-credit value-at-risk w, introduce and move towards value λ, thus, make the final debt-credit value-at-risk w obtained more meet enterprise's present case, be conducive to lending side and make and judging more accurately.
The data being used for calculating enterprise payment of debts credit threshold a, corporate reputation threshold value b and enterprise assets degree of stability threshold value c in the present invention are all easily obtain, and not easily fake, avoid when utilizing enterprise's financial data owing to depending on the low risk brought of financial data validity unduly.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is a kind of enterprise payment of debts methods of risk assessment process flow diagram that the present invention proposes.
Embodiment
With reference to Fig. 1, a kind of enterprise payment of debts methods of risk assessment that the present invention proposes, comprises the following steps:
S1, setup times segmentation, obtain enterprise's payment of debts historical data of nearest multiple time slice, counts repay number of times A on schedule according to the enterprise's payment of debts historical data in each time slice n, exceed the time limit to repay number of times B ndo not repay number of times C nthree kinds, and three class data importings are preset the first computation model calculating acquisition enterprise payment of debts credit fragmentation value a n.First computation model is:
A n=K 1a n+ K 2b n+ K 3c n 2, K 1, K 2and K 3be scale-up factor, wherein, K 1> 0, K 3< 0, K 3< K 2< K 1, concrete desirable K 1=10, K 2=1, K 3=-10.
Enterprise's payment of debts history not only reflects enterprise's fiscal solvency, also reflects the credit of enterprise's debt-credit payment of debts aspect.In present embodiment, enterprise's payment of debts history is assessed, avoid the one-sidedness of single assessment enterprise fiscal solvency, it also avoid independent evaluations enterprise fiscal solvency and the loaded down with trivial details of credit rating of paying a debt.
S2, according to multiple enterprise payment of debts credit fragmentation value a ncalculate represent credit rating variation tendency move towards value λ, wherein, h 0for the time span value of time slice, η is computational constant, and meets λ≤1.Particularly, η determines by drawing coordinate system, take time shaft as X-axis, with enterprise payment of debts credit fragmentation value a nfor Y-axis, then, as (t, a n-1) and (t+h 0, a n) line and X-axis angle when being 45 °,
S3, according to multiple enterprise payment of debts credit fragmentation value a ncalculate enterprise's payment of debts credit threshold a in multiple time slice sum, in present embodiment, multiple time slice sum can equal enterprise's establishment time or the incumbent responsible official of enterprise holds a post the time, the former can embody the payment of debts credit threshold mean value of enterprise since setting up, and the latter can embody incumbent responsible official and to hold a post enterprise's payment of debts credit threshold mean value in the time.
S4, obtain company-related information from internet, and relevant information is divided into positive information and negative report, then according to positive information and negative report occurrence number and the reliability weight occurring website, calculate corporate reputation threshold value b.Reputation threshold calculations model is:
wherein, n is the positive information quantity searched, δ nbe that a positive information is reprinted number of times, β nfor the reliability weight of website appears in described positive information first; M is the positive information quantity searched, α mbe that a negative report is reprinted number of times, ε mfor the reliability weight of website appears in described negative report first.
In this step, capture data by internet, and evaluate according to the overall reputation of information to enterprise captured.The corporate reputation threshold value b obtained in this step can reflect the culture of enterprise to a certain extent.In present embodiment, fully take into account the speed of internet information circulation, thus only consider that the reliability weight of website appears in information first, namely decreases calculated amount and improves counting yield, again by improve the accuracy of assessment to the evaluation in source; And reprint number of times and directly represent the viewed number of times of information and received degree by masses.
S5, the corporate financial information obtained on different time node, judge the total assets of the corresponding timing node of enterprise according to financial information, and according to the variation track of responsible official's total assets, assess enterprise assets degree of stability threshold value c.
This step is specially: the total assets f judging the corresponding timing node of enterprise according to financial information n, and Real-time Obtaining assets mean value f ave, enterprise assets degree of stability threshold value
The assets of any enterprise are all real-time change, the Appreciation gist of enterprise assets degree of stability threshold value as enterprise's debt-credit risk is obtained in present embodiment, the financial data lower relative to validity, enterprise assets degree of stability threshold value is as a relative value, and its confidence level is higher.
S6, according to enterprise payment of debts credit threshold a, corporate reputation threshold value b and enterprise assets degree of stability threshold value c comprehensive descision business standing degree e, the computing formula of business standing degree e is:
ω 1, ω 2and ω 3be computational constant, and desirable positive count value, such as, ω 1, ω 2and ω 3can equal values 1.
By considering enterprise payment of debts credit threshold a, corporate reputation threshold value b and enterprise assets degree of stability threshold value c, business standing degree can be assessed accurately, thus reduce the risk to enterprise's debt-credit.In addition, the data being used for calculating enterprise payment of debts credit threshold a, corporate reputation threshold value b and enterprise assets degree of stability threshold value c in present embodiment are all easily obtain, and not easily fake, avoid when utilizing enterprise's financial data owing to depending on the low risk brought of financial data validity unduly.
S7, according to business standing degree e and move towards value λ calculate debt-credit value-at-risk w.The computing formula of debt-credit value-at-risk w is: ω=(1+ λ) × e.
In this step, when calculating debt-credit value-at-risk w, introducing and moving towards value λ, thus, make the final debt-credit value-at-risk w obtained more meet enterprise's present case, be conducive to lending side and make and judging more accurately.
The above; be only the present invention's preferably embodiment; but protection scope of the present invention is not limited thereto; anyly be familiar with those skilled in the art in the technical scope that the present invention discloses; be equal to according to technical scheme of the present invention and inventive concept thereof and replace or change, all should be encompassed within protection scope of the present invention.

Claims (7)

1. enterprise's payment of debts methods of risk assessment, is characterized in that, comprise the following steps:
S1, setup times segmentation, obtain enterprise's payment of debts historical data of nearest multiple time slice, evaluates the enterprise payment of debts credit fragmentation value a in corresponding time slice according to the enterprise's payment of debts historical data in each time slice n;
S2, according to multiple enterprise payment of debts credit fragmentation value a ncalculate represent credit rating variation tendency move towards value λ, wherein, h 0for the time span value of time slice, η is computational constant, and meets λ≤1;
S3, according to multiple enterprise payment of debts credit fragmentation value a ncalculate enterprise's payment of debts credit threshold a in multiple time slice sum, a = &Sigma; n = 1 a n / n ;
S4, obtain company-related information from internet, and relevant information is divided into positive information and negative report, then according to positive information and negative report occurrence number and the reliability weight occurring website, calculate corporate reputation threshold value b;
S5, the corporate financial information obtained on different time node, judge the total assets of the corresponding timing node of enterprise according to financial information, and according to the variation track of responsible official's total assets, assess enterprise assets degree of stability threshold value c;
S6, according to enterprise payment of debts credit threshold a, corporate reputation threshold value b and enterprise assets degree of stability threshold value c comprehensive descision business standing degree e;
S7, according to business standing degree e and move towards value λ calculate debt-credit value-at-risk w.
2. enterprise as claimed in claim 1 payment of debts methods of risk assessment, it is characterized in that, step S1 is specially: count according to the enterprise's payment of debts historical data in each time slice and repay number of times A on schedule n, exceed the time limit to repay number of times B ndo not repay number of times C nthree kinds, and three class data importings are preset the first computation model calculating acquisition enterprise payment of debts credit fragmentation value a n; First computation model is:
A n=K 1a n+ K 2b n+ K 3c n 2, K 1, K 2and K 3be scale-up factor, wherein, K 1> 0, K 3< 0, K 3< K 2< K 1.
3. enterprise as claimed in claim 1 or 2 payment of debts methods of risk assessment, is characterized in that, in step S3, multiple time slice sum equals enterprise's establishment time or the incumbent responsible official of enterprise holds a post the time.
4. enterprise as claimed in claim 1 payment of debts methods of risk assessment, it is characterized in that, in step S4, reputation threshold calculations model is:
wherein, n is the positive information quantity searched, δ nbe that a positive information is reprinted number of times, β nfor the reliability weight of website appears in described positive information first; M is the positive information quantity searched, α mbe that a negative report is reprinted number of times, ε mfor the reliability weight of website appears in described negative report first.
5. enterprise as claimed in claim 1 payment of debts methods of risk assessment, it is characterized in that, step S5 is specially: obtain the corporate financial information on different time node, judges the total assets f of the corresponding timing node of enterprise according to financial information n, and Real-time Obtaining assets mean value f ave, enterprise assets degree of stability threshold value c = &Sigma; n = 1 f n - f a v e f a v e .
6. enterprise as claimed in claim 1 payment of debts methods of risk assessment, it is characterized in that, in step S6, the computing formula of business standing degree e is:
ω 1, ω 2and ω 3be computational constant, and desirable positive count value.
7. the enterprise's payment of debts methods of risk assessment as described in any one of claim 1 to 6, is characterized in that, in step S7, the computing formula of debt-credit value-at-risk w is: ω=(1+ λ) × e.
CN201510757578.6A 2015-11-05 2015-11-05 Enterprise debt paying risk assessment method Pending CN105335891A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201510757578.6A CN105335891A (en) 2015-11-05 2015-11-05 Enterprise debt paying risk assessment method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201510757578.6A CN105335891A (en) 2015-11-05 2015-11-05 Enterprise debt paying risk assessment method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN105335891A true CN105335891A (en) 2016-02-17

Family

ID=55286402

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201510757578.6A Pending CN105335891A (en) 2015-11-05 2015-11-05 Enterprise debt paying risk assessment method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN105335891A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107766311A (en) * 2017-09-27 2018-03-06 武汉达策信息技术有限公司 Risk investment method for reporting data and system are automatically generated based on OnlineBox systems
CN108416662A (en) * 2017-02-10 2018-08-17 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 A kind of data verification method and device

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108416662A (en) * 2017-02-10 2018-08-17 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 A kind of data verification method and device
CN108416662B (en) * 2017-02-10 2021-09-21 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 Data verification method and device
CN107766311A (en) * 2017-09-27 2018-03-06 武汉达策信息技术有限公司 Risk investment method for reporting data and system are automatically generated based on OnlineBox systems

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Panta Non-performing loans and bank profitability: Study of joint venture banks in Nepal
CN104992234A (en) Enterprise risk assessment method based on various kinds of operation data
CN104966227A (en) Enterprise risk assessment system based on a plurality of operating data
CN105431878A (en) System and method for automatically providing a/r-based lines of credit to businesses
Reitgruber Methodological thoughts on expected loss estimates for IFRS 9 impairment: hidden reserves, cyclical loss predictions and LGD backtesting
CN105631742A (en) Small and medium enterprise credit evaluation method
Fu et al. Empirical study on financial risk factors: Capital structure, operation ability, profitability, and solvency——evidence from listed companies in China
Accornero et al. First-time corporate bond issuers in Italy
CN105447748A (en) Enterprise credit risk statistical method
CN105335826A (en) Enterprise debt paying credit risk assessment system
CN105335891A (en) Enterprise debt paying risk assessment method
CN112766814A (en) Training method, device and equipment for credit risk pressure test model
Orphanides et al. Money and inflation: the role of information regarding the determinants of M2 behavior
Hui et al. A dynamic mathematical test of international property securities bubbles and crashes
CN105654235A (en) Risk assessment method for medium-sized and small enterprises
Jarrow et al. Risk measures and the impact of asset price bubbles
CN105631593A (en) Enterprise evaluation method based on data credibility
Chang et al. A consistent framework for modelling basis spreads in tenor swaps
CN111476457A (en) Financial index calculation method
de Sousa et al. Does the single currency a ect FDI? A gravity-like approach
Vujnović et al. VALIDATION OF LOSS GIVEN DEFAULT FOR CORPORATE PORTFOLIO IN REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Kuběnka Improvement of prosperity prediction in Czech manufacturing industries
CN105447749A (en) Enterprise lending credit evaluation system
Howard Stress testing with incomplete data: a practical guide
Ramakrishnan et al. Impact of sectors on default prediction: theoretical discussion

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C41 Transfer of patent application or patent right or utility model
CB03 Change of inventor or designer information

Inventor after: Xu Wei

Inventor before: Xu Rongjing

COR Change of bibliographic data
TA01 Transfer of patent application right

Effective date of registration: 20161230

Address after: 230000 Anhui province high tech Zone National University Science and Technology Park Business Incubator Center C District, the first layer of college students dream factory, station 9, No. 10, No.

Applicant after: Hefei intellectual property Mdt InfoTech Ltd

Address before: 230000 Hefei science and technology zone, Anhui province high tech Road, room 107, No. 701

Applicant before: ANHUI RONGXIN JINMO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.

SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20160217