CN105141697A - Multi-QoS constrained cloud computing task scheduling method - Google Patents

Multi-QoS constrained cloud computing task scheduling method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN105141697A
CN105141697A CN201510593188.XA CN201510593188A CN105141697A CN 105141697 A CN105141697 A CN 105141697A CN 201510593188 A CN201510593188 A CN 201510593188A CN 105141697 A CN105141697 A CN 105141697A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
qos
resource
task
sigma
prime
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201510593188.XA
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
张小庆
徐志伟
岳强
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
G Cloud Technology Co Ltd
Original Assignee
G Cloud Technology Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by G Cloud Technology Co Ltd filed Critical G Cloud Technology Co Ltd
Priority to CN201510593188.XA priority Critical patent/CN105141697A/en
Priority to PCT/CN2015/090064 priority patent/WO2017045211A1/en
Publication of CN105141697A publication Critical patent/CN105141697A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F9/00Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
    • G06F9/06Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
    • G06F9/46Multiprogramming arrangements
    • G06F9/50Allocation of resources, e.g. of the central processing unit [CPU]
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/50Network services
    • H04L67/60Scheduling or organising the servicing of application requests, e.g. requests for application data transmissions using the analysis and optimisation of the required network resources
    • H04L67/61Scheduling or organising the servicing of application requests, e.g. requests for application data transmissions using the analysis and optimisation of the required network resources taking into account QoS or priority requirements
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F9/00Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
    • G06F9/06Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
    • G06F9/46Multiprogramming arrangements
    • G06F9/50Allocation of resources, e.g. of the central processing unit [CPU]
    • G06F9/5083Techniques for rebalancing the load in a distributed system

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention belongs to the cloud computing technical field and relates to a multi-QoS constrained cloud computing task scheduling method. According to the method, required QoS descriptions of all tasks submitted by users are given, and QoS service providing ability descriptions of all resources when the resources are distributed are given; and a scheduling algorithm tries to search a QoS optimal task scheduling scheme according to the QoS descriptions, so that the QoS optimal task scheduling scheme can be obtained. With the multi-QoS constrained cloud computing task scheduling method adopted, problems existing in multi-QoS constrained cloud computing task scheduling can be solved. The method can be applied to cloud computing task scheduling.

Description

A kind of cloud computing method for scheduling task of multi-QoS constraint
Technical field
The present invention relates to field of cloud computer technology, especially a kind of cloud computing method for scheduling task of multi-QoS constraint.
Background technology
Cloud computing, as a kind of new computation schema and business model, is just being subject to the extensive attention of academia and industrial circle.Cloud computing technology is Distributed Calculation, the further developing of parallel computation and grid computing, Intel Virtualization Technology is utilized to turn to dynamic telescopic virtual resources pond virtual to computational resource, storage resources and bandwidth resources, take the Internet as carrier, be supplied to different users in the form of services as required and use.Data center under cloud computing environment can reduce the difficulty of operation, maintenance and management effectively, also improves the safety and reliability of data simultaneously.By adopting the mechanism of paying as required, user there is no need to buy extra hardware resource on network peak, not only saves the expense buying hardware like this, also eliminates the problem that maintenance and management brings simultaneously.
Task scheduling is very crucial in cloud computing technology and the problem of complexity, and the quality of this Resolving probiems not only has influence on the satisfaction of user, also greatly have impact on the overall performance of system.Therefore, under cloud environment, how scheduling is efficiently carried out rationally to task, improve the satisfaction of user, become the Focal point and difficult point of cloud computing research.Generally, task scheduling is a np complete problem.
At present a lot of scholars, expert and enterprise has been had to drop into a large amount of human and material resources and financial resources are studied task scheduling strategy wherein.Cloud computing produces on the basis of Distributed Calculation, effectiveness calculating, grid computing, and have a lot of task scheduling algorithms to be all find out on the basis of grid computing in cloud computing.And be exactly make all task runs complete required minimal time in a main target of Job Scheduling for Grid Computing algorithm, most task scheduling algorithm is all optimized task scheduling with this target.But in cloud computing model, the cost required for tasks carrying, the time expended and load balancing are all the resources of the focus instantly studied, different computing capability, and its use cost is also different.For the application of time-sensitive, provide the resource of stronger disposal ability, make task run complete the required time shorter; User for cost sensitivity applies, and provide lower to manage the resource of cost, make task run complete required cost lower, and cloud computing task scheduling algorithm is used by the just needs that meet of these different demands.
Having in cloud computing task scheduling manyly has problem to be solved, such as load balancing, minimum completion time etc.The minimum completion time of consideration task is a kind of strategy making full use of system resource, the resource in cloud resource pool has plenty of isomery, has plenty of isomorphism.In heterogeneous distributed cloud resource pool, by considering that minimum completion time factor can make the fast machine of the speed of service better be utilized, also make the slow machine of the speed of service to be unlikely to distribute too much task simultaneously thus cause tasks carrying time-out, so be necessary to the consideration of this factor of minimum completion time.
Load balancing is the method often used in cloud computing task scheduling, has following two kinds of forms: the first, in static equilibrium, utilize the information such as number of tasks and time of implementation, distributed by the method in mathematics between task and resource.The shortcoming of this strategy to cause resource utilization not high, and for the change of virtual machine information, this kind of balance policy cannot dynamically change; The second, in dynamic equalization, generally all realized by prediction.The foundation that algorithm carries out predicting is the current of virtual machine and historical information, then carries out task scheduling according to prediction result out.For this algorithm, rational standard is very important.The HDFS system of the product E C2 of Amazon and the product improvement of Yahoo also has in the product G FS of Google has all carried out actual research and apply to load balancing, so have great importance to the better cloud computing task scheduling algorithm of proposition.
In cloud computing task scheduling, also have another one to need key issue and the service quality (QoS, QualityofService) of solution badly.QoS is a kind of method solving network stabilization performance, and the delayed and congestion problems in network is also solved by service quality.And be applied to now in cloud computing, QoS is exactly some demands that reflection user proposes when using cloud computing system.QoS comprises much different parameters, and we compare and common are CPU, cost, access rate, distance, resource stability, memory capacity etc.Qos parameters much is more so had, so cloud computing system develops can provide different platform of serving to meet different user institute and putting forward the different demand of task owing to using in the demand of the user of cloud computing system.These platforms can meet the dissimilar demand of user, such as ensure the reliability of system, consume less cost, provide higher message transmission rate etc.The so many realization of QoS demand to cloud computing task scheduling algorithm are huge challenges.Even if consider the QoS demand of user to task for the current task scheduling based on QoS proposed, but also just consider one dimension QoS demand simply, namely single time or cost.Therefore, the task scheduling strategy proposing to have multi-QoS constraint is necessary for the development of cloud computing.
Summary of the invention
The technical problem that the present invention solves is the cloud computing method for scheduling task providing a kind of multi-QoS constraint; To propose the task scheduling strategy with multi-QoS constraint.
The technical scheme that the present invention solves the problems of the technologies described above is:
All users describe the QoS that submitting to of task provides its demand, and all resources also provide it when issuing and provide QoS service ability description; Dispatching algorithm describes according to these QoS, attempts search and obtains the optimized task scheduling approach of QoS.
Described method concrete steps are:
Obtain task-set T and cloud resource set R, and extract the QoS of task-set and resource;
Standardization is carried out to task-set and resource QoS, obtains standardization task QoS matrix and resource QoS matrix;
Calculating is respectively the QoS weights of resource;
Calculation task concentrates the comprehensive QoS demand of each task, and according to QoS demand by task descending, obtains new task-set TT;
To the task t1 of first in new task-set TT, calculate the QoS satisfaction that it arrives each resource; Obtain the resource set RR of QoS Maximum Satisfaction;
If only have a resource in maximum resource set RR, distribute t1 and perform to this resource; Otherwise, calculate the QoS distance that t1 to RR concentrates each resource, distribute t1 to QoS and perform apart from minimum resource;
If there is multiple task, then the task of Resources allocation is deleted, then, carry out according to the method for back the distribution performing resource; Until whole task matching execution resources;
After tasks carrying Resourse Distribute completes, whether polling tasks is finished;
As task is not finished, then check whether available free resource; When available free resource situation, judge further in the highest QoS satisfaction task sequence in this resource with or without not being finished of task; Not during available free resource, then turn back to the poll that whether complete tasks carrying is;
As complete in QoS satisfaction tasks carrying the highest in idling-resource, then by the task scheduling that is not finished to the idling-resource of this highest QoS satisfaction until tasks carrying is complete;
As tasks carrying is complete, then terminate.
Described set of tasks is expressed as T, T={t1, t2 ..., tn}, n=|T| are user task quantity, and ti represents i-th task of user, i ∈ [1, n]; Ti={tID, tLen, tQoS, tSta};
TID: the unique identification representing task;
TLen: the length representing task, unit: MI (MillionInstruction);
TQoS:tQoS={QoS 1, QoS 2..., QoS krepresenting the multi-QoS demand of task, k represents QoS dimension;
TSta:tSta={tAlloc, tExecu, tSucc}, represent the state of user task, and divide three kinds: tAlloc to represent that task treats dispatch state, tExecu represents execution status of task, and tSucc represents tasks carrying completion status;
Being P, P={p1, p2..., p1}, l=|P| by the physical host set table method of resource, is physical host quantity; Ph={pID, pType, pSta}.
PID: the unique identification representing physical host;
Ptype: the type representing physical host, as work station, large-scale computer or microcomputer etc.;
Psta: represent the state of physical host, Psta={pFree, pRun}, pFre represent that physical host is in idle condition, does not namely dispose virtual machine or virtual machine is not executed the task, and pRun represents that physical host is in running order;
Represent resource with virtual machine form, resource collection is expressed as R, R={r1, r2 ..., rm}, m=|R|, be resource (virtual machine) quantity that cloud data center provides, rj represents a jth resource, j ∈ [1, m]; Rj={rID, rCap, rQoS, rSta, rLoc};
RID: the unique identification representing resource;
RCap: the computing capability representing resource, unit: MIPS (MillionInstructinPerSecond);
RQoS:rQoS={QoS 1, QoS 2..., QoS krepresenting the multi-QoS service ability of resource, k represents QoS dimension.
RSta:rSta={rRun, rFre} represent the state of resource, and divide two kinds: rRun to represent that resource is in the state of executing the task, rFre represents that resource is in idle condition.
RLoc: the physical host representing resource place.
Described QoS standardization is:
The QoS dimension making resource provide is k, and resource quantity is m, then the QoS that m resource provides is m × k matrix, is expressed as:
QoS m , k R = qos 1 , 1 R , qos 1 , 2 R , ... , qos 1 , k R qos 2 , 1 R , qos 2 , 2 R , ... , qos 2 , k R ... ... ... ... qos m , 1 R , qos m , 2 R , ... , qos m , k R
Make number of tasks be n, then the demand of n task on k dimension QoS can be expressed as n × k matrix, is expressed as:
QoS n , k T = qos 1 , 1 T , qos 1 , 2 T , ... , qos 1 , k T qos 2 , 1 T , qos 2 , 2 T , ... , qos 2 , k T ... ... ... ... qos n , 1 T , qos n , 2 T , ... , qos n , k T
Then the mode of clicking carries out standardization;
First simultaneous two matrixes, obtain simultaneous matrix,
QoS m + n , k = qos 1 , 1 R , qos 1 , 2 R , ... , qos 1 , k R qos 2 , 1 R , qos 2 , 2 R , ... , qos 2 , k R ... ... ... ... qos m , 1 R , qos m , 2 R , ... , qos m , k R qos 1 , 1 T , qos 1 , 2 T , ... , qos 1 , k T qos 2 , 1 T , qos 2 , 2 , T , ... , qos 2 , k T ... ... ... ... qos n , 1 T , qos n , 2 T , ... , qos n , k T
During standardization, QoS is divided into actively tolerance and negative metric; Positive metric is higher shows that service quality is higher, as reliability, fail safe, stability; Consume that metric is lower shows that service quality is higher, as service fee; Positive tolerance carries out standardization with formula 1, consumes tolerance and carries out standardization with formula 2;
qos i , j S = 1 , qos j max - qos j min = 0 qos i , j - qos j min qos j max - qos j min , qos j max - qos j min ≠ 0 Formula 1
qos i , j S = 1 , qos j max - qos j min = 0 qos j max - qos i , j qos j max - qos j min , qos j max - qos j min ≠ 0 Formula 2
Wherein, qos i, jrepresenting matrix QoS m+n, kin the i-th row jth row qos value, 1 <=i <=m+n, 1 <=j <=k, be illustrated respectively in matrix QoS m+n, kthe minimum value of middle jth row qos parameter value and maximum, represent the qos value of the i-th row jth row after standardization, normalized matrix is expressed as:
Separation criterion matrix obtain standardization resource QoS matrix and task QoS matrix, be expressed as with
QoS m , k S R = qos 1 , 1 S R , qos 1 , 2 S R , ... , qos 1 , k S R qos 2 , 1 S R , qos 2 , 2 S R , ... , qos 2 , k S R ... ... ... ... qos m , 1 S R , qos m , 2 S R , ... , qos m , k S R , QoS n , k S T = qos 1 , 1 S T , qos 1 , 2 S T , ... , qos 1 , k S T qos 2 , 1 S T , qos 2 , 2 S T , ... , qos 2 , k S T ... ... ... ... qos n , 1 S T , qos n , 2 S T , ... , qos n , k S T .
The calculating of described resource QoS satisfaction is:
For positive tolerance, calculate with formula 1 satisfaction that user obtains on this dimension QoS, for negative metric, calculate satisfaction with formula 2;
QoS i , j D e g = qos i , j S R qos i , j S T , qos i , j S R < qos i , j S T 1 , qos i , j S R &GreaterEqual; qos i , j S T Formula 1
QoS i , j D e g = qos i , j S T qos i , j S R , qos i , j S T < qos i , j S R 1 , qos i , j S T &GreaterEqual; qos i , j S R Formula 2
Then user task t icomprehensive satisfaction in performed resource on each dimension QoS is:
QoS i D e g = &Sigma; j = 1 k QoS i , j D e g k
The average QoS satisfaction of all user tasks is:
QoS D e g = &Sigma; i = 1 n QoS i D e g n
In task scheduling process, select the highest resource of satisfaction to distribute as far as possible.
Described QoS distance calculates and is:
Utilize Weighted distance to the QoS distance between the task of measuring and resource,
D = &Sigma; j = 1 k w j ( qos i , j S T - qos i , j S R ) 2
s . t . w j &GreaterEqual; 0 , j = 1 , 2 , ... , k , &Sigma; j = 1 k w j 2 = 1
Wherein, w jrepresent jth dimension QoS shared weight when distance calculates; w jmaximizing deviation method is used to determine size; The capacity of water gap that resource provides on jth dimension QoS is larger, illustrates that the impact of this parameter when measuring distance is larger, corresponding w jlarger, otherwise, w jless; Consider that the capacity of water that provide of all resources on jth dimension QoS is equal, then this parameter affects when measuring distance is 0, now should w jbe decided to be 0; For jth dimension QoS, use D i, jw () represents resource ri and other resources deviation in this QoS service ability, then
D i , j ( w ) = &Sigma; i &prime; = 1 m | rs i , j w j - rs i &prime; , j w j | , i = 1 , 2 , ... , m , j = 1 , 2 , ... , k
Order
D j = &Sigma; i = 1 m D i , j ( w ) = &Sigma; i = 1 m &Sigma; i &prime; = 1 m | rs i , j w j - rs i &prime; , j w j | , j = 1 , 2 , ... , k
Dj represents the service ability of each resource and total deviation of other resource service abilities on jth dimension QoS;
The value of resource QoS comprehensive service capability and user QoS integration requirement after qos parameter standardization is calculated with following formula;
U q o s ( w ) = &Sigma; j = 1 k qos i , j w j
For each resource, U qosw () is larger, its comprehensive QoS service ability is better; Construct target function thus,
max D ( w ) = &Sigma; j = 1 m D j ( w ) = &Sigma; j = 1 k &Sigma; i = 1 m &Sigma; i &prime; = 1 m | rs i , j - rs i &prime; , j | &times; w j
Be equal to
max D ( w ) = &Sigma; j = 1 k &Sigma; i = 1 m &Sigma; i &prime; = 1 m | rs i , j - rs i &prime; , j | &times; w j
s . t . w j &GreaterEqual; 0 , j = 1 , 2 , ... , k , &Sigma; j = 1 k w j 2 = 1
By Lagrangian method can try to achieve target function maximum time,
w j = &Sigma; i = 1 m &Sigma; i &prime; = 1 m | rs i , j - rs i &prime; , j | &Sigma; j = 1 k &Sigma; i = 1 m &Sigma; i &prime; = 1 m | rs i , j - rs i &prime; , j | , j = 1 , 2 , ... , k .
Scheduling user task problem different to the requirement of QoS goal constraint under the present invention is directed to cloud computing environment, proposes a kind of cloud computing method for scheduling task of multi-QoS constraint.The method considers based on maximum QoS satisfaction and minimum QoS distance between task and resource, by the target function of structure reflection QoS service ability, and solves target function with Lagrangian method, obtains the solution of resource selection and task scheduling.The present invention, under the prerequisite meeting the maximum satisfaction of user task QoS, selects the resource of minimum QoS distance to map, and not only can guarantee the task scheduling efficiency during QoS constraint of multidimensional, reduce average task execution time, can also ensure resource utilization.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Below in conjunction with accompanying drawing, the present invention is further described:
Fig. 1 is cloud computing Task Scheduling Model of the present invention;
Fig. 2 is algorithm flow chart of the present invention.
Embodiment
As shown in Figure 2, task scheduling concrete steps of the present invention are:
Obtain task-set T and cloud resource set R, and extract the QoS of task-set and resource;
Standardization is carried out to task-set and resource QoS, obtains standardization task QoS matrix and resource QoS matrix;
Calculating is respectively the QoS weights of resource;
Calculation task concentrates the comprehensive QoS demand of each task, and according to QoS demand by task descending, obtains new task-set TT;
To the task t1 of first in new task-set TT, calculate the QoS satisfaction that it arrives each resource; Obtain the resource set RR of QoS Maximum Satisfaction;
If only have a resource in maximum resource set RR, distribute t1 and perform to this resource; Otherwise, calculate the QoS distance that t1 to RR concentrates each resource, distribute t1 to QoS and perform apart from minimum resource;
If there is multiple task, then the task of Resources allocation is deleted, then, carry out according to the method for back the distribution performing resource; Until whole task matching execution resources;
After tasks carrying Resourse Distribute completes, whether polling tasks is finished;
As task is not finished, then check whether available free resource; When available free resource situation, judge further in the highest QoS satisfaction task sequence in this resource with or without not being finished of task; Not during available free resource, then turn back to the poll that whether complete tasks carrying is;
As complete in QoS satisfaction tasks carrying the highest in idling-resource, then by the task scheduling that is not finished to the idling-resource of this highest QoS satisfaction until tasks carrying is complete;
As tasks carrying is complete, then terminate.
Below, be described in detail from the aspect such as multi-QoS constraint, problem description, multi-QoS constrained procedure of the QoS of cloud task scheduling, cloud computing.
1, the QoS of cloud task scheduling
In cloud computing Task Scheduling Model based on Qos constraint, the task that all users submits to needs the QoS providing its demand to describe, and all resources also need to provide it when issuing and provide QoS service ability description.Dispatching algorithm describes according to these QoS, attempts search and obtains the optimized task scheduling approach of QoS.The QoS that task and resource provide describes can some classifications, describes for each class QoS, for quantizing the income that when it is met in various degree, system obtains, draws the concept of benefit function.
QoS as module describes and comprises:
Timeliness describes: the attribute description of time correlation.The timeliness QoS of task describes and comprises total deadline, time started, latest finishing time etc.The timeliness QoS of resource describes the computing capability etc. comprising resource.Without loss of generality, the latest finishing time considering task and the running time of task in resource drawn by Resource Calculation ability.
Reliability describes: long playing task may the failure due to resource failed.Re-execute task and will cause the resource consumption of repetition, cause systematic function to reduce.The reliability of task by its requirement is dispatched, the generation of this situation can be reduced.Such of task describes to comprise and is minimumly successfully completed rate etc.; Such description of resource comprises unit interval failure rate etc.
Priority: the relative importance describing task.The higher task of priority needs comparatively early to be performed, and the higher resource of priority will preferentially be used when benefit is identical.
QoS as strategy describes and is mainly service class, and it acts on above all kinds of descriptions, comprising:
Rigid level: the QoS with this rank describes has the strongest restraining force.Such description of task must be met, otherwise is exactly invalid to its scheduling.
Soft level: having some QoS to describe does not need so strong constraint.This type of of task describes as being satisfied, then obtain greatest benefit, but if do not met, scheduling is not considered to invalid yet, and just benefit is affected.
As possible level: this rank is used for showing some and is not concerned or inessential QoS describes.This type of description of task and resource can be met as far as possible or be realized.
2, the multi-QoS constraint of cloud computing
Traditional cloud task scheduling target is generally the guarantee of one-dimensional QoS, as the shortest task completion time.In the cloud computing environment of reality, the interests desired by cloud user are multiple, are not single demand.Be described as example with timeliness QoS, some users not only pursue task and obtain the shortest deadline, also require to finish the work within the time limit sometime.Cloud environment relates to the distributed environment of multiple entity, and from the angle of cloud user subject and cloud resource entity, its QoS target in administrative mechanism, security strategy and expense etc. is all not quite similar.As, user not only expects also to require the least cost of tasks carrying by the shortest time that task completes.And cloud resource entity is more it is considered that self carry out the income of tasks carrying, pay close attention to the throughput-maximized of whole system simultaneously.
The present invention will pay close attention to the QoS of following Four types, and makes quantification treatment:
1) fail safe
Safety QoS is defined as:
QoS S e c u r i t y = &Sigma; i = 1 n t i s i &Sigma; i = 1 n t i
Wherein, n represents security parameter number, and ti represents the weight of i-th security parameter, and si=1 represents that i-th security parameter is met, otherwise is 0.
2) QoS is stablized
QoS S t a l i t y = R u n T i m e R u n T i m e + F a i l u r e T i m e
Wherein, RunTime represents the resource uptime, and FailureTime represents the resource failed time.
3) success rate QoS
QoS S u c c e s s = N S u c c e s s N T o t a l
Wherein, Nsuccess represents the number of tasks of successful execution in resource, and Ntotal represents and is assigned to number of tasks total in resource.
4) expense QoS
QoS cost=V×T
Wherein, V represents utilization of resources unit price, and T represents the time that task is run in resource.
3, problem describes
About cloud computing task, first make the following assumptions: the cloud task type of consideration is mainly calculation type Meta task, do not have dependence between task, do not consider performing across resource in implementation when task performs in resource, the Meta task that namely user submits to is the minimum unit of task scheduling.
Set of tasks is expressed as T, T={t1, t2 ..., tn}, n=|T| are user task quantity, and ti represents i-th task of user, i ∈ [1, n].ti={tID,tLen,tQoS,tSta}。
TID: the unique identification representing task;
TLen: the length representing task, unit: MI (MillionInstruction);
TQoS:tQoS={QoS 1, QoS 2..., QoS krepresenting the multi-QoS demand of task, k represents QoS dimension.
TSta:tSta={tAlloc, tExecu, tSucc}, represent the state of user task, and divide three kinds: tAlloc to represent that task treats dispatch state, tExecu represents execution status of task, and tSucc represents tasks carrying completion status.
Cloud computing provides the mode of resource virtual for the physical host multiple stage virtual machine that turns to be carried out resource and provides in the data in the heart, and physical host set table method is P, P={p1, p2..., p1}, l=|P|, is physical host quantity.Ph={pID,pType,pSta}。
PID: the unique identification representing physical host;
Ptype: the type representing physical host, as work station, large-scale computer or microcomputer etc.;
Psta: represent the state of physical host, Psta={pFree, pRun}, pFre represent that physical host is in idle condition, does not namely dispose virtual machine or virtual machine is not executed the task, and pRun represents that physical host is in running order.
Because task is finally perform on a virtual machine, represent resource with virtual machine form, resource collection is expressed as R, R={r1, r2 ..., rm}, m=|R|, for resource (virtual machine) quantity that cloud data center provides, rj represents a jth resource, j ∈ [1, m].rj={rID,rCap,rQoS,rSta,rLoc}。
RID: the unique identification representing resource;
RCap: the computing capability representing resource, unit: MIPS (MillionInstructinPerSecond);
RQoS:rQoS={QoS 1, QoS 2..., QoS krepresenting the multi-QoS service ability of resource, k represents QoS dimension.
RSta:rSta={rRun, rFre} represent the state of resource, and divide two kinds: rRun to represent that resource is in the state of executing the task, rFre represents that resource is in idle condition.
RLoc: the physical host representing resource place.
Based on above three class entities, cloud computing Task Scheduling Model as shown in Figure 1.
4, multi-QoS constrained procedure
1) multi-QoS standardization
The QoS dimension making resource provide is k, and resource quantity is m, then the QoS that m resource provides is m × k matrix, is expressed as:
QoS m , k R = qos 1 , 1 R , qos 1 , 2 R , ... , qos 1 , k R qos 2 , 1 R , qos 2 , 2 R , ... , qos 2 , k R ... ... ... ... qos m , 1 R , qos m , 2 R , ... , qos m , k R
Make number of tasks be n, then the demand of n task on k dimension QoS can be expressed as n × k matrix, is expressed as:
QoS n , k T = qos 1 , 1 T , qos 1 , 2 T , ... , qos 1 , k T qos 2 , 1 T , qos 2 , 2 T , ... , qos 2 , k T ... ... ... ... qos n , 1 T , qos n , 2 T , ... , qos n , k T
QoS due to resource provides the otherness with the QoS demand of task, and for the ease of evaluating the QoS service ability of user's QoS demand and resource, then two matrixes carry out standardization below.
First simultaneous two matrixes, obtain simultaneous matrix,
QoS m + n , k = qos 1 , 1 R , qos 1 , 2 R , ... , qos 1 , k R qos 2 , 1 R , qos 2 , 2 R , ... , qos 2 , k R ... ... ... ... qos m , 1 R , qos m , 2 R , ... , qos m , k R qos 1 , 1 T , qos 1 , 2 T , ... , qos 1 , k T qos 2 , 1 T , qos 2 , 2 , T , ... , qos 2 , k T ... ... ... ... qos n , 1 T , qos n , 2 T , ... , qos n , k T
During standardization, QoS is divided into actively tolerance and negative metric.Positive metric is higher shows that service quality is higher, as reliability, fail safe, stability.Consume that metric is lower shows that service quality is higher, as service fee.Positive tolerance carries out standardization with formula 1, consumes tolerance and carries out standardization with formula 2,
qos i , j S = 1 , qos j max - qos j min = 0 qos i , j - qos j min qos j max - qos j min , qos j max - qos j min &NotEqual; 0
qos i , j S = 1 , qos j max - qos j min = 0 qos j max - qos i , j qos j max - qos j min , qos j max - qos j min &NotEqual; 0
Wherein, qos i, jrepresenting matrix QoS m+n, kin the i-th row jth row qos value, 1 <=i <=m+n, 1 <=j <=k, be illustrated respectively in matrix QoS m+n, kthe minimum value of middle jth row qos parameter value and maximum, represent the qos value of the i-th row jth row after standardization, normalized matrix is expressed as:
QoS m + n , k S = qos 1 , 1 S , qos 1 , 2 S , ... , qos 1 , k S qos 2 , 1 S , qos 2 , 2 S , ... , qos 2 , k S ... ... ... ... qos m , 1 S , qos m , 2 S , ... , qos m , k S qos m + 1 , 1 S , qos m + 1 , 2 , S , ... , qos m + 1 , k S ... ... ... ... qos m + n , 1 S , qos m + n , 2 S , ... , qos m + n , k S , qos i , j S &Element; &lsqb; 0 , 1 &rsqb; , 1 &le; i &le; m + n , 1 &le; j &le; k
Separation criterion matrix obtain standardization resource QoS matrix and task QoS matrix, be expressed as with
QoS m , k S R = qos 1 , 1 S R , qos 1 , 2 S R , ... , qos 1 , k S R qos 2 , 1 S R , qos 2 , 2 S R , ... , qos 2 , k S R ... ... ... ... qos m , 1 S R , qos m , 2 S R , ... , qos m , k S R , QoS n , k S T = qos 1 , 1 S T , qos 1 , 2 S T , ... , qos 1 , k S T qos 2 , 1 S T , qos 2 , 2 S T , ... , qos 2 , k S T ... ... ... ... qos n , 1 S T , qos n , 2 S T , ... , qos n , k S T .
2) the QoS satisfaction of user
Task scheduling should the QoS demand of satisfied users substantially.For positive tolerance, calculate with formula 1 satisfaction that user obtains on this dimension QoS, for negative metric, calculate satisfaction with formula 2.
QoS i , j D e g = qos i , j S R qos i , j S T , qos i , j S R < qos i , j S T 1 , qos i , j S R &GreaterEqual; qos i , j S T
QoS i , j D e g = qos i , j S T qos i , j S R , qos i , j S T < qos i , j S R 1 , qos i , j S T &GreaterEqual; qos i , j S R
Then user task t icomprehensive satisfaction in performed resource on each dimension QoS is:
QoS i D e g = &Sigma; j = 1 k QoS i , j D e g k
The average QoS satisfaction of all user tasks is:
QoS D e g = &Sigma; i = 1 n QoS i D e g n
In task scheduling process, distribute selecting the highest resource of satisfaction as far as possible.
3) QoS distance metric
In order to the resource not making the task of low QoS demand take high QoS, affect the tasks carrying of other users, cause total time of implementation to increase, task matching should be made as far as possible to perform on the resource similar with oneself QoS demand.Utilize Weighted distance to the QoS distance between the task of measuring and resource,
D = &Sigma; j = 1 k w j ( qos i , j S T - qos i , j S R ) 2
s . t . w j &GreaterEqual; 0 , j = 1 , 2 , ... , k , &Sigma; j = 1 k w j 2 = 1
Wherein, w jrepresent jth dimension QoS shared weight when distance calculates.The capacity of water gap provided on each dimension QoS due to resource is different, in order to carry out range measurement better, uses maximizing deviation method to determine w jsize.The capacity of water gap that resource provides on jth dimension QoS is larger, illustrates that the impact of this parameter when measuring distance is larger, corresponding w jlarger, otherwise, w jless.Consider that the capacity of water that provide of all resources on jth dimension QoS is equal, then this parameter affects when measuring distance is 0, now should w jbe decided to be 0.For jth dimension QoS, use D i, jw () represents resource r iwith the deviation of other resources in this QoS service ability, then
D i , j ( w ) = &Sigma; i &prime; = 1 m | rs i , j w j - rs i &prime; , j w j | , i = 1 , 2 , ... , m , j = 1 , 2 , ... , k
Order
D j = &Sigma; i = 1 m D i , j ( w ) = &Sigma; i = 1 m &Sigma; i &prime; = 1 m | rs i , j w j - rs i &prime; , j w j | , j = 1 , 2 , ... , k
Dj represents the service ability of each resource and total deviation of other resource service abilities on jth dimension QoS.
The value of resource QoS comprehensive service capability and user QoS integration requirement after qos parameter standardization is calculated with following formula.
U q o s ( w ) = &Sigma; j = 1 k qos i , j w j
Obviously, for each resource, U qosw () is larger, its comprehensive QoS service ability is better.Construct target function thus,
max D ( w ) = &Sigma; j = 1 m D j ( w ) = &Sigma; j = 1 k &Sigma; i = 1 m &Sigma; i &prime; = 1 m | rs i , j - rs i &prime; , j | &times; w j
Be equal to
max D ( w ) = &Sigma; j = 1 k &Sigma; i = 1 m &Sigma; i &prime; = 1 m | rs i , j - rs i &prime; , j | &times; w j
s . t . w j &GreaterEqual; 0 , j = 1 , 2 , ... , k , &Sigma; j = 1 k w j 2 = 1
By Lagrangian method can try to achieve target function maximum time,
w j = &Sigma; i = 1 m &Sigma; i &prime; = 1 m | rs i , j - rs i &prime; , j | &Sigma; j = 1 k &Sigma; i = 1 m &Sigma; i &prime; = 1 m | rs i , j - rs i &prime; , j | , j = 1 , 2 , ... , k .

Claims (8)

1. a cloud computing method for scheduling task for multi-QoS constraint, is characterized in that: all users describe the QoS that submitting to of task provides its demand, and all resources also provide it when issuing and provide QoS service ability description; Dispatching algorithm describes according to these QoS, attempts search and obtains the optimized task scheduling approach of QoS.
2. the cloud computing method for scheduling task of multi-QoS constraint according to claim 1, is characterized in that: described method concrete steps are:
Obtain task-set T and cloud resource set R, and extract the QoS of task-set and resource;
Standardization is carried out to task-set and resource QoS, obtains standardization task QoS matrix and resource QoS matrix;
Calculating is respectively the QoS weights of resource;
Calculation task concentrates the comprehensive QoS demand of each task, and according to QoS demand by task descending, obtains new task-set TT;
To the task t1 of first in new task-set TT, calculate the QoS satisfaction that it arrives each resource; Obtain the resource set RR of QoS Maximum Satisfaction;
If only have a resource in maximum resource set RR, distribute t1 and perform to this resource; Otherwise, calculate the QoS distance that t1 to RR concentrates each resource, distribute t1 to QoS and perform apart from minimum resource;
If there is multiple task, then the task of Resources allocation is deleted, then, carry out according to the method for back the distribution performing resource; Until whole task matching execution resources;
After tasks carrying Resourse Distribute completes, whether polling tasks is finished;
As task is not finished, then check whether available free resource; When available free resource situation, judge further in the highest QoS satisfaction task sequence in this resource with or without not being finished of task; Not during available free resource, then turn back to the poll that whether complete tasks carrying is;
As complete in QoS satisfaction tasks carrying the highest in idling-resource, then by the task scheduling that is not finished to the idling-resource of this highest QoS satisfaction until tasks carrying is complete;
As tasks carrying is complete, then terminate.
3. the cloud computing method for scheduling task of multi-QoS constraint according to claim 2, is characterized in that: described set of tasks is expressed as T, T={t1, t2, ..., tn}, n=|T| are user task quantity, ti represents i-th task of user, i ∈ [1, n]; Ti={tID, tLen, tQoS, tSta};
TID: the unique identification representing task;
TLen: the length representing task, unit: MI (MillionInstruction);
TQoS:tQoS={QoS 1, QoS 2..., QoS krepresenting the multi-QoS demand of task, k represents QoS dimension;
TSta:tSta={tAlloc, tExecu, tSucc}, represent the state of user task, and divide three kinds: tAlloc to represent that task treats dispatch state, tExecu represents execution status of task, and tSucc represents tasks carrying completion status;
Being P, P={p1, p2..., p1}, l=|P| by the physical host set table method of resource, is physical host quantity; Ph={pID, pType, pSta}.
PID: the unique identification representing physical host;
Ptype: the type representing physical host, as work station, large-scale computer or microcomputer etc.;
Psta: represent the state of physical host, Psta={pFree, pRun}, pFre represent that physical host is in idle condition, does not namely dispose virtual machine or virtual machine is not executed the task, and pRun represents that physical host is in running order;
Represent resource with virtual machine form, resource collection is expressed as R, R={r1, r2 ..., rm}, m=|R|, be resource (virtual machine) quantity that cloud data center provides, rj represents a jth resource, j ∈ [1, m]; Rj={rID, rCap, rQoS, rSta, rLoc};
RID: the unique identification representing resource;
RCap: the computing capability representing resource, unit: MIPS (MillionInstmctinPerSecond);
RQoS:rQoS={QoS 1, QoS 2..., QoS krepresenting the multi-QoS service ability of resource, k represents QoS dimension.
RSta:rSta={rRun, rFre} represent the state of resource, and divide two kinds: rRun to represent that resource is in the state of executing the task, rFre represents that resource is in idle condition.
RLoc: the physical host representing resource place.
4. the cloud computing method for scheduling task of multi-QoS constraint according to claim 2, is characterized in that: described QoS standardization is:
The QoS dimension making resource provide is k, and resource quantity is m, then the QoS that m resource provides is m × k matrix, is expressed as:
Make number of tasks be n, then the demand of n task on k dimension QoS can be expressed as n × k matrix, is expressed as:
Then the mode of clicking carries out standardization;
First simultaneous two matrixes, obtain simultaneous matrix,
During standardization, QoS is divided into actively tolerance and negative metric; Positive metric is higher shows that service quality is higher, as reliability, fail safe, stability; Consume that metric is lower shows that service quality is higher, as service fee; Positive tolerance carries out standardization with formula 1, consumes tolerance and carries out standardization with formula 2;
qos i , j S = 1 , qos j max - qos j min = 0 qos i , j - qos j min qos j max - qos j min , qos j max - qos j min &NotEqual; 0 Formula 1
qos i , j S = 1 , qos j max - qos j min = 0 qos j max - qos i , j qos j max - qos j min , qos j max - qos j min &NotEqual; 0 Formula 2
Wherein, qos i, jrepresenting matrix QoS m+n, kin the i-th row jth row qos value, 1 <=i <=m+n, 1 <=j <=k, be illustrated respectively in matrix QoS m+n, kthe minimum value of middle jth row qos parameter value and maximum, represent the qos value of the i-th row jth row after standardization, normalized matrix is expressed as:
Separation criterion matrix obtain standardization resource QoS matrix and task QoS matrix, be expressed as with
5. the cloud computing method for scheduling task of multi-QoS constraint according to claim 3, is characterized in that: described QoS standardization is:
The QoS dimension making resource provide is k, and resource quantity is m, then the QoS that m resource provides is m × k matrix, is expressed as:
Make number of tasks be n, then the demand of n task on k dimension QoS can be expressed as n × k matrix, is expressed as:
Then the mode of clicking carries out standardization;
First simultaneous two matrixes, obtain simultaneous matrix,
During standardization, QoS is divided into actively tolerance and negative metric; Positive metric is higher shows that service quality is higher, as reliability, fail safe, stability; Consume that metric is lower shows that service quality is higher, as service fee; Positive tolerance carries out standardization with formula 1, consumes tolerance and carries out standardization with formula 2;
qos i , j S = 1 , qos j max - qos j min = 0 qos i , j - qos j min qos j max - qos j min , qos j max - qos j min &NotEqual; 0 Formula 1
qos i , j S = 1 , qos j max - qos j min = 0 qos j max - qos i , j qos j max - qos j min , qos j max - qos j min &NotEqual; 0 Formula 2
Wherein, qos i, jrepresenting matrix QoS m+n, kin the i-th row jth row qos value, 1 <=i <=m+n, 1 <=j <=k, be illustrated respectively in matrix QoS m+n, kthe minimum value of middle jth row qos parameter value and maximum, represent the qos value of the i-th row jth row after standardization, normalized matrix is expressed as:
Separation criterion matrix obtain standardization resource QoS matrix and task QoS matrix, be expressed as with
6. the cloud computing method for scheduling task of the multi-QoS constraint according to any one of claim 2 to 5, is characterized in that: the calculating of described resource QoS satisfaction is:
For positive tolerance, calculate with formula 1 satisfaction that user obtains on this dimension QoS, for negative metric, calculate satisfaction with formula 2;
QoS i , j D e g = qos i , j S R qos i , j S T , qos i , j S R < qos i , j S T 1 , qos i , j S R &GreaterEqual; qos i , j S T Formula 1
QoS i , j D e g = qos i , j S T qos i , j S T , qos i , j S T < qos i , j S R 1 , qos i , j S T &GreaterEqual; qos i , j S R Formula 2
Then user task t icomprehensive satisfaction in performed resource on each dimension QoS is:
QoS i D e g = &Sigma; j = 1 k QoS i , j D e g k
The average QoS satisfaction of all user tasks is:
QoS D e g = &Sigma; i = 1 n QoS i D e g n
In task scheduling process, select the highest resource of satisfaction to distribute as far as possible.
7. the cloud computing method for scheduling task of the multi-QoS constraint according to any one of claim 2 to 5, is characterized in that: described QoS distance calculates and is:
Utilize Weighted distance to the QoS distance between the task of measuring and resource,
D = &Sigma; j = 1 k w j ( qos i , j S T - qos i , j S R ) 2
s . t . w j &GreaterEqual; 0 , j = 1 , 2 , ... , k , &Sigma; j = 1 k w j 2 = 1
Wherein, w jrepresent jth dimension QoS shared weight when distance calculates; w jmaximizing deviation method is used to determine size; The capacity of water gap that resource provides on jth dimension QoS is larger, illustrates that the impact of this parameter when measuring distance is larger, corresponding w jlarger, otherwise, w jless; Consider that the capacity of water that provide of all resources on jth dimension QoS is equal, then this parameter affects when measuring distance is 0, now should w jbe decided to be 0; For jth dimension QoS, use D i, jw () represents resource ri and other resources deviation in this QoS service ability, then
D i , j ( w ) = &Sigma; i &prime; = 1 m | rs i , j w j - rs i &prime; , j w j | , i = 1 , 2 , ... , m , j = 1 , 2 , ... , k
Order
D j = &Sigma; i = 1 m D i , j ( w ) = &Sigma; i = 1 m &Sigma; i &prime; = 1 m | rs i , j w j - rs i &prime; , j w j | , j = 1 , 2 , ... , k
Dj represents the service ability of each resource and total deviation of other resource service abilities on jth dimension QoS;
The value of resource QoS comprehensive service capability and user QoS integration requirement after qos parameter standardization is calculated with following formula;
U q o s ( w ) = &Sigma; j = 1 k qos i , j w j
For each resource, U qosw () is larger, its comprehensive QoS service ability is better; Construct target function thus,
max D ( w ) = &Sigma; j = 1 m D j ( w ) = &Sigma; j = 1 k &Sigma; i = 1 m &Sigma; i &prime; = 1 m | rs i , j - rs i &prime; , j | &times; w j
Be equal to
max D ( w ) = &Sigma; j = 1 k &Sigma; i = 1 m &Sigma; i &prime; = 1 m | rs i , j - rs i &prime; , j | &times; w j
s . t . w j &GreaterEqual; 0 , j = 1 , 2 , ... , k , &Sigma; j = 1 k w j 2 = 1
By Lagrangian method can try to achieve target function maximum time,
w j = &Sigma; i = 1 m &Sigma; i &prime; = 1 m | rs i , j - rs i &prime; , j | &Sigma; j = 1 k &Sigma; i = 1 m &Sigma; i &prime; = 1 m | rs i , j - rs i &prime; , j | , j = 1 , 2 , ... , k .
8. the cloud computing method for scheduling task of multi-QoS constraint according to claim 6, is characterized in that: described QoS distance calculates and is:
Utilize Weighted distance to the QoS distance between the task of measuring and resource,
D = &Sigma; j = 1 k w j ( qos i , j S T - qos i , j S R ) 2
s . t . w j &GreaterEqual; 0 , j = 1 , 2 , ... , k , &Sigma; j = 1 k w j 2 = 1
Wherein, w jrepresent jth dimension QoS shared weight when distance calculates; w jmaximizing deviation method is used to determine size; The capacity of water gap that resource provides on jth dimension QoS is larger, illustrates that the impact of this parameter when measuring distance is larger, corresponding w jlarger, otherwise, w jless; Consider that the capacity of water that provide of all resources on jth dimension QoS is equal, then this parameter affects when measuring distance is 0, now should w jbe decided to be 0; For jth dimension QoS, use D i, jw () represents resource ri and other resources deviation in this QoS service ability, then
D i , j ( w ) = &Sigma; i &prime; = 1 m | rs i , j w j - rs i &prime; , j w j | , i = 1 , 2 , ... , m , j = 1 , 2 , ... , k
Order
D j = &Sigma; i = 1 m D i , j ( w ) = &Sigma; i = 1 m &Sigma; i &prime; = 1 m | rs i , j w j - rs i &prime; , j w j | , j = 1 , 2 , ... , k
Dj represents the service ability of each resource and total deviation of other resource service abilities on jth dimension QoS;
The value of resource QoS comprehensive service capability and user QoS integration requirement after qos parameter standardization is calculated with following formula;
U q o s ( w ) = &Sigma; j = 1 k qos i , j w j
For each resource, U qosw () is larger, its comprehensive QoS service ability is better; Construct target function thus,
max D ( w ) = &Sigma; j = 1 m D j ( w ) = &Sigma; j = 1 k &Sigma; i = 1 m &Sigma; i &prime; = 1 m | rs i , j - rs i &prime; , j | &times; w j
Be equal to
max D ( w ) = &Sigma; j = 1 k &Sigma; i = 1 m &Sigma; i &prime; = 1 m | rs i , j - rs i &prime; , j | &times; w j s . t . w j &GreaterEqual; 0 , j = 1 , 2 , ... , k , &Sigma; j = 1 k w j 2 = 1
By Lagrangian method can try to achieve target function maximum time,
w j = &Sigma; i = 1 m &Sigma; i &prime; = 1 m | rs i , j - rs i &prime; , j | &Sigma; j = 1 k &Sigma; i = 1 m &Sigma; i &prime; = 1 m | rs i , j - rs i &prime; , j | , j = 1 , 2 , ... , k .
CN201510593188.XA 2015-09-16 2015-09-16 Multi-QoS constrained cloud computing task scheduling method Pending CN105141697A (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201510593188.XA CN105141697A (en) 2015-09-16 2015-09-16 Multi-QoS constrained cloud computing task scheduling method
PCT/CN2015/090064 WO2017045211A1 (en) 2015-09-16 2015-09-19 Cloud computing task scheduling method constrained by multiple quality-of-service requirements

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201510593188.XA CN105141697A (en) 2015-09-16 2015-09-16 Multi-QoS constrained cloud computing task scheduling method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN105141697A true CN105141697A (en) 2015-12-09

Family

ID=54726900

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201510593188.XA Pending CN105141697A (en) 2015-09-16 2015-09-16 Multi-QoS constrained cloud computing task scheduling method

Country Status (2)

Country Link
CN (1) CN105141697A (en)
WO (1) WO2017045211A1 (en)

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105744006A (en) * 2016-05-10 2016-07-06 中国民航大学 Particle swarm optimization user request dispatching method facing multi-type service
CN106095581A (en) * 2016-06-18 2016-11-09 南京采薇且歌信息科技有限公司 A kind of network storage virtualization dispatching method under the conditions of privately owned cloud
CN106610866A (en) * 2016-06-17 2017-05-03 四川用联信息技术有限公司 Service value constrained task scheduling algorithm in cloud storage environment
CN106973030A (en) * 2016-01-14 2017-07-21 北京仿真中心 A kind of cloud artificial resource dispatching method based on SLA
CN107656810A (en) * 2017-08-29 2018-02-02 山东师范大学 Ensure the method for delay-sensitive procedure service quality under data center environment
WO2018036104A1 (en) * 2016-08-26 2018-03-01 华为技术有限公司 Virtual machine deployment method, system and physical server
CN107967179A (en) * 2017-12-12 2018-04-27 山东省计算中心(国家超级计算济南中心) A kind of cloud computing resources distribution method for supporting emergency
CN108563498A (en) * 2018-04-12 2018-09-21 武汉轻工大学 A kind of cloud computing method for scheduling task and simulation system
CN109656685A (en) * 2018-12-14 2019-04-19 深圳市网心科技有限公司 Container resource regulating method and system, server and computer readable storage medium
CN113900824A (en) * 2021-10-29 2022-01-07 桂林航天工业学院 Cloud platform virtual resource high-speed scheduling method
CN117651074A (en) * 2023-12-07 2024-03-05 上海南洋万邦软件技术有限公司 Effectiveness evaluation method of cloud resources
CN113900824B (en) * 2021-10-29 2024-06-07 桂林航天工业学院 Cloud platform virtual resource high-speed scheduling method

Families Citing this family (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107943566B (en) * 2017-10-19 2023-10-24 中国人民解放军空军工程大学 Multifunctional integrated radar task scheduling algorithm based on earliest time line
CN108958919B (en) * 2018-07-13 2023-07-25 湘潭大学 Multi-DAG task scheduling cost fairness evaluation method with deadline constraint in cloud computing
CN109639498B (en) * 2018-12-27 2021-08-31 国网江苏省电力有限公司南京供电分公司 Service quality oriented resource flexible configuration method based on SDN and NFV
CN110147280B (en) * 2019-05-14 2023-01-31 河南城建学院 Big data application scheduling method based on security and cost perception
CN111447266B (en) * 2020-03-24 2022-11-11 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 Mobile edge calculation model based on chain and service request and scheduling method thereof
CN111818119B (en) * 2020-05-04 2023-10-24 国网浙江省电力有限公司 Improved spider cluster-based data service resource optimization scheduling method
CN112149958B (en) * 2020-08-24 2024-02-13 成都天奥集团有限公司 Method for calculating multidimensional performance evaluation index of antenna base station network resources
CN112073491B (en) * 2020-08-31 2023-08-22 交信北斗科技有限公司 Gateway proxy and service scheduling method for Internet GIS application
CN112181694B (en) * 2020-10-14 2023-08-04 重庆邮电大学 Cloud computing network maintenance reliability analysis method
CN112256427B (en) * 2020-10-21 2024-04-05 北京人人云图信息技术有限公司 Large-scale resource rapid allocation device based on improved branch limit method
CN113051046B (en) * 2020-12-09 2024-05-24 南京航空航天大学 Task scheduling method based on dynamic priority in vehicle-mounted cloud environment
CN113254146A (en) * 2021-04-25 2021-08-13 西安电子科技大学 Cloud platform service trust value calculation, task scheduling and load balancing system and method
CN113467903B (en) * 2021-05-18 2024-04-16 杭州电子科技大学 Service workflow scheduling method oriented to energy consumption and safety perception
CN114531365B (en) * 2022-04-24 2022-07-15 北京华创方舟科技集团有限公司 Cloud resource automatic operation and maintenance method under multi-cloud environment

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101271407A (en) * 2008-05-13 2008-09-24 武汉理工大学 Gridding scheduling method based on energy optimization
CN101271405A (en) * 2008-05-13 2008-09-24 武汉理工大学 Bidirectional grade gridding resource scheduling method based on QoS restriction
US20100223379A1 (en) * 2004-09-28 2010-09-02 International Business Machines Corporation Coordinating service performance and application placement management
CN103561077A (en) * 2013-10-29 2014-02-05 李飞 Cloud storage task scheduling method on condition of multiple QoS constraints

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100223379A1 (en) * 2004-09-28 2010-09-02 International Business Machines Corporation Coordinating service performance and application placement management
CN101271407A (en) * 2008-05-13 2008-09-24 武汉理工大学 Gridding scheduling method based on energy optimization
CN101271405A (en) * 2008-05-13 2008-09-24 武汉理工大学 Bidirectional grade gridding resource scheduling method based on QoS restriction
CN103561077A (en) * 2013-10-29 2014-02-05 李飞 Cloud storage task scheduling method on condition of multiple QoS constraints

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106973030A (en) * 2016-01-14 2017-07-21 北京仿真中心 A kind of cloud artificial resource dispatching method based on SLA
CN105744006A (en) * 2016-05-10 2016-07-06 中国民航大学 Particle swarm optimization user request dispatching method facing multi-type service
CN106610866A (en) * 2016-06-17 2017-05-03 四川用联信息技术有限公司 Service value constrained task scheduling algorithm in cloud storage environment
CN106095581A (en) * 2016-06-18 2016-11-09 南京采薇且歌信息科技有限公司 A kind of network storage virtualization dispatching method under the conditions of privately owned cloud
WO2018036104A1 (en) * 2016-08-26 2018-03-01 华为技术有限公司 Virtual machine deployment method, system and physical server
CN107656810B (en) * 2017-08-29 2021-01-08 山东师范大学 Method for ensuring service quality of delay sensitive program under data center environment
CN107656810A (en) * 2017-08-29 2018-02-02 山东师范大学 Ensure the method for delay-sensitive procedure service quality under data center environment
CN107967179A (en) * 2017-12-12 2018-04-27 山东省计算中心(国家超级计算济南中心) A kind of cloud computing resources distribution method for supporting emergency
CN107967179B (en) * 2017-12-12 2021-08-06 山东省计算中心(国家超级计算济南中心) Cloud computing resource allocation method supporting emergency
CN108563498A (en) * 2018-04-12 2018-09-21 武汉轻工大学 A kind of cloud computing method for scheduling task and simulation system
CN109656685A (en) * 2018-12-14 2019-04-19 深圳市网心科技有限公司 Container resource regulating method and system, server and computer readable storage medium
CN113900824A (en) * 2021-10-29 2022-01-07 桂林航天工业学院 Cloud platform virtual resource high-speed scheduling method
CN113900824B (en) * 2021-10-29 2024-06-07 桂林航天工业学院 Cloud platform virtual resource high-speed scheduling method
CN117651074A (en) * 2023-12-07 2024-03-05 上海南洋万邦软件技术有限公司 Effectiveness evaluation method of cloud resources

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2017045211A1 (en) 2017-03-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN105141697A (en) Multi-QoS constrained cloud computing task scheduling method
Singh et al. QRSF: QoS-aware resource scheduling framework in cloud computing
CN103338241B (en) A kind of new publicly-owned cloud framework and virtual resources adaptive configuring method thereof
Li et al. Load balance based workflow job scheduling algorithm in distributed cloud
CN102932422B (en) Cloud environment task scheduling method based on improved ant colony algorithm
Liu et al. Resource preprocessing and optimal task scheduling in cloud computing environments
CN109120715A (en) Dynamic load balancing method under a kind of cloud environment
WO2016045515A1 (en) Cloud task scheduling algorithm based on user satisfaction
Mahato et al. On scheduling transactions in a grid processing system considering load through ant colony optimization
Shi et al. Resource allocation with a budget constraint for computing independent tasks in the cloud
Chakravarthi et al. TOPSIS inspired budget and deadline aware multi-workflow scheduling for cloud computing
Li et al. An effective scheduling strategy based on hypergraph partition in geographically distributed datacenters
CN103377407A (en) Method for processing cloud service, and related device and system of cloud service
CN104407912A (en) Virtual machine configuration method and device
CN103561077A (en) Cloud storage task scheduling method on condition of multiple QoS constraints
CN103701894A (en) Method and system for dispatching dynamic resource
CN109240814A (en) A kind of deep learning intelligent dispatching method and system based on TensorFlow
CN105119751A (en) Service evaluation and selection method based on environment real-time perceiving
CN107070965B (en) Multi-workflow resource supply method under virtualized container resource
Xiang et al. Computing power allocation and traffic scheduling for edge service provisioning
CN103997515A (en) Distributed cloud computing center selection method and application thereof
Huang et al. Computation offloading for multimedia workflows with deadline constraints in cloudlet-based mobile cloud
CN104869154A (en) Distributed resource scheduling method for balancing resource credibility and user satisfaction
CN105872109A (en) Load running method of cloud platform
Awasare et al. Survey and comparative study on resource allocation strategies in cloud computing environment

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
WD01 Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication
WD01 Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication

Application publication date: 20151209