CN105022382A - Fault processing method, apparatus and system and fire-fighting device - Google Patents
Fault processing method, apparatus and system and fire-fighting device Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN105022382A CN105022382A CN201510312187.3A CN201510312187A CN105022382A CN 105022382 A CN105022382 A CN 105022382A CN 201510312187 A CN201510312187 A CN 201510312187A CN 105022382 A CN105022382 A CN 105022382A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- fault
- electric control
- control system
- equipment
- described electric
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
- G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
- G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
- G05B23/0259—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterized by the response to fault detection
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Remote Monitoring And Control Of Power-Distribution Networks (AREA)
- Safety Devices In Control Systems (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a fault processing method, apparatus and system and a fire-fighting device. In the technical scheme of the embodiment of the invention, a corresponding system fault grade can be obtained through device fault grade combination. Compared with system fault grade dividing according to the quantity of fault devices in the prior art, the system fault grade dividing in the present invention is more precise. The grading is more accurate. In the technical scheme of the embodiment of the invention, different safety protection measures are brought forward for different system fault grades, thereby substantially raising the safety of an electric control system.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to technical field of information processing, particularly relate to a kind of fault handling method, device, system and fire fighting equipment.
Background technology
For the electric control system of the fire fighting equipments such as fire truck, security and reliability are absolutely necessary two important indicators, therefore, should in real time or timing detect the state of each equipment in electric control system, to know the failure condition of electric control system in time, and it is processed in time, ensure security and the reliability of electric control system.
Particularly, existing electric control system is normally carried out the division of system failure grade according to the number of faulty equipment and and then is realized corresponding system failure process.Such as, when the various kinds of equipment in electric control system all normally works, can think that electric control system is in normal condition, and indicate electric control system normally to work; When equipment component fault in the arbitrary kind equipment in electric control system, can think that electric control system is in minor failure state, and indicate electric control system to continue to go to work braving one's illness; When armamentarium fault in the arbitrary kind equipment in electric control system, can think that electric control system is in severe fault condition, and indicate electric control system to quit work.
But, for the above-mentioned number according to faulty equipment divide electric control system fault level and and then realize the method for corresponding system failure process, when electric control system be in go to work braving one's illness state time, if the key equipment in electric control system only has 1 can work, if electric control system works on, likely can cause again breaking down, even may cause accident in some situation.Such as, high-altitude operation vehicle is when manned work high above the ground, if the Primary Component obliquity sensor of its automatic horizontal control system only remains one and can normally work, then operator just can also continue operation high-altitude operation vehicle and regains operation jib and get back to ground, if but a now only surplus obliquity sensor also breaks down, then directly can there is manned working bucket overthrow accident, make security lower.
That is, the existing number according to faulty equipment divide the fault level of electric control system mode and rigorous not, degree of accuracy is not high, thus causes electric control system to there is potential safety hazard, reduces the security of electric control system.
Summary of the invention
The invention provides a kind of fault handling method based on electric control system, device and fire truck, in order to solve because the failure sorted of existing electric control system is rigorous not, degree of accuracy is not high, and there is the low problem of potential safety hazard, security in the electric control system caused.
The embodiment of the present invention additionally provides a kind of fault handling method, and described method comprises:
Determine the fault level of each equipment in electric control system, and according to the fault level of each equipment determined, obtain the combination of corresponding equipment failure grade;
Combine the corresponding relation with system failure grade according to the equipment failure grade combination obtained and the equipment failure grade set up in advance, determine to combine corresponding system failure grade with the described equipment failure grade obtained;
According to the corresponding relation of the system failure grade determined and the system failure grade set up in advance and fault handling strategy, determine the fault handling strategy corresponding with the described system failure grade determined, and according to the fault handling strategy determined, fault handling is carried out to described electric control system.
Particularly, combine the corresponding relation with system failure grade according to the equipment failure grade combination obtained and the equipment failure grade set up in advance, determine to combine corresponding system failure grade with the described equipment failure grade obtained, comprising:
When the part or all of safety features moderate fault determined in described electric control system or when determining in described electric control system part or all of safety features severe fault, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is one-level;
When the whole safety features minor failure determined in described electric control system or part or all of main implement severe fault or whole main implement moderate fault or all Auxiliary equipment severe fault time, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is secondary;
When the Partial security proterctive equipment minor failure determined in described electric control system or part main implement moderate fault or whole main implement minor failure or part Auxiliary equipment severe fault or all Auxiliary equipment moderate fault time, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is three grades;
When determine the main implement minor failure of the part in described electric control system or part Auxiliary equipment moderate fault or partly or entirely Auxiliary equipment minor failure time, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is level Four;
Wherein, the fault severity level of level fault is greater than secondary failure, the fault severity level of secondary failure is greater than three grades of faults, and the fault severity level of three grades of faults is greater than level Four fault.
Wherein, for arbitrary equipment, when determining that described equipment exists accidental mistake, determine that described equipment is minor failure; When determine to judge described equipment whether fault time, determine that described equipment is moderate fault; When determining that described equipment is in malfunction, determine that described equipment is severe fault.
Particularly, according to the corresponding relation of the system failure grade determined and the system failure grade set up in advance and fault handling strategy, determine the fault handling strategy corresponding with the described system failure grade determined, and according to the fault handling strategy determined, fault handling is carried out to described electric control system, comprising:
If determine, the system failure grade of described electric control system is one-level, then lock described electric control system immediately, and report to the police;
If determine, the system failure grade of described electric control system is secondary, then immediately described electric control system is carried out to the restriction of corresponding dangerous play, and report to the police;
If determine, the system failure grade of described electric control system is three grades, then in the first preset duration, indicate described electric control system to work on, and report to the police;
If determine, the system failure grade of described electric control system is level Four, then in the second preset duration, indicate described electric control system to work on;
Wherein, described first preset duration is less than described second preset duration.
Wherein, described equipment at least comprise in following equipment any one or multiple: sensor, actuator or controller.
Further, the embodiment of the present invention additionally provides a kind of fault treating apparatus, and described device comprises:
Equipment failure grade module, for determining the fault level of each equipment in electric control system, and according to the fault level of each equipment determined, obtains the combination of corresponding equipment failure grade;
System failure level determination module, for the corresponding relation according to the equipment failure grade combination obtained and the equipment failure grade combination of setting up in advance and system failure grade, determine to combine corresponding system failure grade with the described equipment failure grade obtained;
Fault handling strategy determination module, for the corresponding relation according to the system failure grade determined and the system failure grade set up in advance and fault handling strategy, determines the fault handling strategy corresponding with the described system failure grade determined;
Processing module, carries out fault handling for the fault handling strategy determined according to described fault handling strategy determination module to described electric control system.
Particularly, described system failure level determination module, specifically for when the part or all of safety features moderate fault determined in described electric control system or when determining in described electric control system part or all of safety features severe fault, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is one-level;
When the whole safety features minor failure determined in described electric control system or part or all of main implement severe fault or whole main implement moderate fault or all Auxiliary equipment severe fault time, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is secondary;
When the Partial security proterctive equipment minor failure determined in described electric control system or part main implement moderate fault or whole main implement minor failure or part Auxiliary equipment severe fault or all Auxiliary equipment moderate fault time, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is three grades;
When determine the main implement minor failure of the part in described electric control system or part Auxiliary equipment moderate fault or partly or entirely Auxiliary equipment minor failure time, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is level Four;
Wherein, the fault severity level of level fault is greater than secondary failure, the fault severity level of secondary failure is greater than three grades of faults, and the fault severity level of three grades of faults is greater than level Four fault.
Wherein, for arbitrary equipment, when determining that described equipment exists accidental mistake, determine that described equipment is minor failure; When determine to judge described equipment whether fault time, determine that described equipment is moderate fault; When determining that described equipment is in malfunction, determine that described equipment is severe fault.
Particularly, described processing module, if specifically for determining that the system failure grade of described electric control system is one-level, then lock described electric control system immediately, and report to the police;
If determine, the system failure grade of described electric control system is secondary, then immediately described electric control system is carried out to the restriction of corresponding dangerous play, and report to the police;
If determine, the system failure grade of described electric control system is three grades, then in the first preset duration, indicate described electric control system to work on, and report to the police;
If determine, the system failure grade of described electric control system is level Four, then in the second preset duration, indicate described electric control system to work on;
Wherein, described first preset duration is less than described second preset duration.
Wherein, described equipment at least comprise in following equipment any one or multiple: sensor, actuator or controller.
Further, the embodiment of the present invention additionally provides a kind of electric control system, and described electric control system comprises above-mentioned arbitrary described fault treating apparatus.
Further, the embodiment of the present invention additionally provides a kind of fire fighting equipment, and described fire fighting equipment comprises above-mentioned electric control system.
Beneficial effect of the present invention is as follows:
Embodiments provide a kind of fault handling method, device, system and fire fighting equipment, by determining the fault level of each equipment in electric control system, the combination of corresponding equipment failure grade can be obtained, and according to the equipment failure grade combination obtained, the equipment failure grade combination of setting up in advance and the corresponding relation of system failure grade, and the corresponding relation of the system failure grade set up in advance and fault handling strategy, corresponding system failure grade and the fault handling strategy corresponding with the system failure grade determined can be determined, and according to the fault handling strategy determined, fault handling is carried out to described electric control system.That is; in technical scheme described in the embodiment of the present invention; corresponding system failure grade can be obtained by the combination of equipment failure grade; relative to the number dividing system fault level of prior art by faulty equipment; more rigorous, classification is more accurate; and in technical scheme described in the embodiment of the present invention, different safety precautions is proposed to different system fault level, thus substantially increase the security of electric control system.
Accompanying drawing explanation
In order to be illustrated more clearly in the technical scheme in the embodiment of the present invention, below the accompanying drawing used required in describing embodiment is briefly introduced, apparently, accompanying drawing in the following describes is only some embodiments of the present invention, for those of ordinary skill in the art, under the prerequisite not paying creative work, other accompanying drawing can also be obtained according to these accompanying drawings.
Figure 1 shows that the schematic flow sheet of a kind of fault handling method described in the embodiment of the present invention one;
Figure 2 shows that the structural representation of a kind of fault treating apparatus described in the embodiment of the present invention two.
Embodiment
In order to make the object, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention clearly, below in conjunction with accompanying drawing, the present invention is described in further detail, and obviously, described embodiment is only the present invention's part embodiment, instead of whole embodiments.Based on the embodiment in the present invention, those of ordinary skill in the art, not making other embodiments all obtained under creative work prerequisite, belong to the scope of protection of the invention.
Embodiment one
The embodiment of the present invention one provides a kind of fault handling method, and as shown in Figure 1, it is the schematic flow sheet of fault handling method described in the embodiment of the present invention one, and described method can comprise the following steps:
Step 101: the fault level determining each equipment in electric control system, and according to the fault level of each equipment determined, obtain the combination of corresponding equipment failure grade.
Step 102: combine the corresponding relation with system failure grade according to the equipment failure grade combination obtained and the equipment failure grade set up in advance, determine to combine corresponding system failure grade with the described equipment failure grade obtained.
Step 103: according to the corresponding relation of the system failure grade determined and the system failure grade set up in advance and fault handling strategy, determine the fault handling strategy corresponding with the described system failure grade determined, and according to the fault handling strategy determined, fault handling is carried out to described electric control system.
That is; in technical scheme described in the embodiment of the present invention; corresponding system failure grade can be obtained by the combination of equipment failure grade; relative to the number dividing system fault level of prior art by faulty equipment; more rigorous, classification is more accurate; and in technical scheme described in the embodiment of the present invention, different safety precautions is proposed to different system fault level, thus substantially increase the security of electric control system.
Wherein, described electric control system can be redundant system, that is, each equipment in electric control system all has one or more alternate device, and the embodiment of the present invention does not repeat this.
It should be noted that, the equipment failure grade combination of setting up in advance and the corresponding relation of system failure grade, and the corresponding relation of the system failure grade set up in advance and fault handling strategy, can be to each equipment in electric control system, in certain hour section, carry out each corresponding relation that failure condition detection obtains, also can be each corresponding relation determined according to artificial experience, the embodiment of the present invention be not construed as limiting this.
In addition, it should be noted that, described equipment at least can comprise in following equipment any one or multiple: sensor, actuator or controller, equipment described in certain embodiment of the present invention does not limit by type, as long as the equipment whether being in malfunction can be detected in electric control system, as display, switchgear etc., the embodiment of the present invention is not construed as limiting this.
Such as, with equipment be sensor and by system failure grade classification for level Four is example, the equipment failure grade combination in the embodiment of the present invention and the corresponding relation of system failure grade are described.2 safeguard protection sensors are had in supposing the system, 2 main operation sensors and 2 less important work sensors, the equipment failure grade combination of then setting up in advance can be as shown in table 1 below with the corresponding relation of system failure grade, wherein, described safeguard protection sensor refers to the sensor that whether there will be security incident for detecting electric control system, such as, high-altitude operation vehicle is when manned work high above the ground, the Primary Component obliquity sensor of its automatic horizontal control system and manned working bucket load cell etc. are safeguard protection sensor, because, once the Primary Component obliquity sensor of automatic horizontal control system or manned working bucket load cell break down, then directly can there is manned working bucket to tumble or manned working bucket such as to come off at the accident.
The mapping table of the combination of table 1 equipment failure grade and system failure grade
Correspondingly, still for by system failure grade classification for level Four, according to the equipment failure grade combination obtained and the equipment failure grade set up in advance, the corresponding relation with system failure grade is combined for step 102, determine to combine corresponding system failure grade with the described equipment failure grade obtained, can specifically comprise:
When the part or all of safety features moderate fault determined in described electric control system or when determining in described electric control system part or all of safety features severe fault, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is one-level;
When the whole safety features minor failure determined in described electric control system or part or all of main implement severe fault or whole main implement moderate fault or all Auxiliary equipment severe fault time, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is secondary;
When the Partial security proterctive equipment minor failure determined in described electric control system or part main implement moderate fault or whole main implement minor failure or part Auxiliary equipment severe fault or all Auxiliary equipment moderate fault time, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is three grades;
When determine the main implement minor failure of the part in described electric control system or part Auxiliary equipment moderate fault or partly or entirely Auxiliary equipment minor failure time, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is level Four;
Wherein, the fault severity level of level fault is greater than secondary failure, the fault severity level of secondary failure is greater than three grades of faults, and the fault severity level of three grades of faults is greater than level Four fault, and the embodiment of the present invention does not repeat this.
It should be noted that, for arbitrary equipment, when determining that described equipment exists accidental mistake, determining that described equipment is minor failure; When determine to judge described equipment whether fault time, determine that described equipment is moderate fault; When determining that described equipment is in malfunction, determine that described equipment is severe fault, certainly also divide the fault level of equipment by alternate manner, the embodiment of the present invention is not construed as limiting this.
Such as, suppose that described equipment is sensor, if the signal value deviation obtaining two detection signals of the very short time of being separated by of same sensor is larger, if a signal value is 0, a signal value is 100, then cannot judge this sensor whether fault, now can determine that described sensor is moderate fault, the embodiment of the present invention does not repeat this.
It should be noted that, the mode of embodiment of the present invention dividing system fault level is not limited to the above-mentioned level Four system failure and divides, also can be three grades by system failure grade classification according to actual conditions, Pyatyi, the arbitrary system failure grades such as six grades, the embodiment of the present invention is not construed as limiting this.
Such as, if be Pyatyi by system failure grade classification, then, correspondingly, step 102 combines the corresponding relation with system failure grade according to the equipment failure grade combination obtained and the equipment failure grade set up in advance, determine to combine corresponding system failure grade with the described equipment failure grade obtained, can specifically comprise:
When the whole safety features moderate fault determined in described electric control system or when determining in described electric control system whole safety features severe fault, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is one-level; When the Partial security proterctive equipment moderate fault determined in described electric control system or when determining in described electric control system Partial security proterctive equipment severe fault, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is secondary; When the whole safety features minor failure determined in described electric control system or part or all of main implement severe fault or whole main implement moderate fault or all Auxiliary equipment severe fault time, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is three grades; When the Partial security proterctive equipment minor failure determined in described electric control system or part main implement moderate fault or whole main implement minor failure or part Auxiliary equipment severe fault or all Auxiliary equipment moderate fault time, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is level Four; When determine the main implement minor failure of the part in described electric control system or part Auxiliary equipment moderate fault or partly or entirely Auxiliary equipment minor failure time, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is Pyatyi; Wherein, the fault severity level of level fault is greater than secondary failure, the fault severity level of secondary failure is greater than three grades of faults, the fault severity level of three grades of faults is greater than level Four fault, and the fault severity level of level Four fault is greater than Pyatyi fault, and the embodiment of the present invention does not repeat this.
Further, still for by system failure grade classification for level Four, for the corresponding relation of step 103 according to the system failure grade determined and the system failure grade set up in advance and fault handling strategy, determine the fault handling strategy corresponding with the described system failure grade determined, and according to the fault handling strategy determined, fault handling is carried out to described electric control system, can specifically comprise:
If determine, the system failure grade of described electric control system is one-level, then lock described electric control system immediately, and report to the police;
If determine, the system failure grade of described electric control system is secondary, then immediately described electric control system is carried out to the restriction of corresponding dangerous play, and report to the police;
If determine, the system failure grade of described electric control system is three grades, then in the first preset duration, indicate described electric control system to work on, and report to the police;
If determine, the system failure grade of described electric control system is level Four, then in the second preset duration, indicate described electric control system to work on;
Wherein, described first preset duration is less than described second preset duration.
That is, for the level fault in system failure grade and secondary failure, electric control system can respond immediately, fault is processed, and for grade fault of three in system failure grade and level Four fault, without the need to making an immediate response, can respond in preset duration, therefore, technical scheme described in the embodiment of the present invention can improve the processing priority of catastrophic failure not by taking the system failure of different brackets the way of different response time delay, thus improves the security of electric control system.
Wherein, the level Four system failure grade set up in advance and the corresponding relation of fault handling strategy can be as shown in table 2 below.
The mapping table of table 2 level Four system failure grade and fault handling strategy
It should be noted that, similar with system failure grade classification mode, fault handling strategy is also not limited to above-mentioned dividing mode, also can according to actual conditions, be divided into the multistage fault handling strategy matched with corresponding system failure number of levels, the embodiment of the present invention is not construed as limiting this.
Such as, if be Pyatyi by system failure grade classification, then fault handling strategy also should be Pyatyi fault handling strategy relatively, and the embodiment of the present invention does not repeat this.
In addition, it should be noted that, after determining electric control system fault, except carrying out except fault handling according to corresponding fault handling strategy, system failure grade and corresponding fault handling strategy can also be shown, so that staff checks.
Further, the above-mentioned equipment failure grade set up in advance combines the corresponding relation with system failure grade, the system failure grade set up in advance and the corresponding relation of fault handling strategy also can be same corresponding relation, particularly, with equipment be still sensor and by system failure grade classification for level Four is example, the combination of equipment failure grade, system failure grade and fault handling strategy three corresponding relation can be as shown in table 3 below.
Table 3 three mapping table
In addition, it should be noted that, described warning can be the warning measure such as sound and light alarm or information warning, and the embodiment of the present invention is not construed as limiting this.
The embodiment of the present invention one provides a kind of fault handling method, by determining the fault level of each equipment in electric control system, the combination of corresponding equipment failure grade can be obtained, and according to the equipment failure grade combination obtained, the equipment failure grade combination of setting up in advance and the corresponding relation of system failure grade, and the corresponding relation of the system failure grade set up in advance and fault handling strategy, corresponding system failure grade and the fault handling strategy corresponding with the system failure grade determined can be determined, and according to the fault handling strategy determined, fault handling is carried out to described electric control system.That is; in technical scheme described in the embodiment of the present invention; corresponding system failure grade can be obtained by the combination of equipment failure grade; relative to the number dividing system fault level of prior art by faulty equipment; more rigorous, classification is more accurate; and in technical scheme described in the embodiment of the present invention, different safety precautions is proposed to different system fault level, thus substantially increase the security of electric control system.
Embodiment two
Based on the inventive concept identical with the embodiment of the present invention one, the embodiment of the present invention two provides a kind of fault treating apparatus, the concrete enforcement of this fault treating apparatus can see the associated description in said method embodiment one, repetition part repeats no more, as shown in Figure 2, this fault treating apparatus mainly can comprise its structural representation:
Equipment failure level determination module 21, can be used for the fault level determining each equipment in electric control system, and according to the fault level of each equipment determined, obtains the combination of corresponding equipment failure grade;
System failure level determination module 22, can be used for the corresponding relation according to the equipment failure grade combination obtained and the equipment failure grade combination of setting up in advance and system failure grade, determine to combine corresponding system failure grade with the described equipment failure grade obtained;
Fault handling strategy determination module 23, can be used for the corresponding relation according to the system failure grade determined and the system failure grade set up in advance and fault handling strategy, determines the fault handling strategy corresponding with the described system failure grade determined;
Processing module 24, the fault handling strategy that can be used for determining according to described fault handling strategy determination module 23 carries out fault handling to described electric control system.
It should be noted that, described equipment at least can comprise in following equipment any one or multiple: sensor, actuator or controller, equipment described in certain embodiment of the present invention does not limit by type, as long as the equipment whether being in malfunction can be detected in electric control system, as display, switchgears etc., the embodiment of the present invention is not construed as limiting this.
Further, for by system failure grade classification for level Four, described system failure level determination module 22, specifically for when the part or all of safety features moderate fault determined in described electric control system or when determining in described electric control system part or all of safety features severe fault, can determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is one-level;
When the whole safety features minor failure determined in described electric control system or part or all of main implement severe fault or whole main implement moderate fault or all Auxiliary equipment severe fault time, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is secondary;
When the Partial security proterctive equipment minor failure determined in described electric control system or part main implement moderate fault or whole main implement minor failure or part Auxiliary equipment severe fault or all Auxiliary equipment moderate fault time, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is three grades;
When determine the main implement minor failure of the part in described electric control system or part Auxiliary equipment moderate fault or partly or entirely Auxiliary equipment minor failure time, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is level Four;
Wherein, the fault severity level of level fault is greater than secondary failure, the fault severity level of secondary failure is greater than three grades of faults, and the fault severity level of three grades of faults is greater than level Four fault.
It should be noted that, for arbitrary equipment, when determining that described equipment exists accidental mistake, determining that described equipment is minor failure; When determine to judge described equipment whether fault time, determine that described equipment is moderate fault; When determining that described equipment is in malfunction, determine that described equipment is severe fault.
Further, still for by system failure grade classification for level Four, described processing module 24, if specifically for determining that the system failure grade of described electric control system is one-level, then can lock described electric control system immediately, and report to the police;
If determine, the system failure grade of described electric control system is secondary, then immediately described electric control system is carried out to the restriction of corresponding dangerous play, and report to the police;
If determine, the system failure grade of described electric control system is three grades, then in the first preset duration, indicate described electric control system to work on, and report to the police;
If determine, the system failure grade of described electric control system is level Four, then in the second preset duration, indicate described electric control system to work on;
Wherein, described first preset duration is less than described second preset duration.
Further, the embodiment of the present invention two additionally provides a kind of electric control system, and described electric control system can comprise above-mentioned arbitrary described fault treating apparatus.
Further, the embodiment of the present invention two additionally provides a kind of fire fighting equipment, and described fire fighting equipment can comprise above-mentioned electric control system.
That is, technical scheme described in the embodiment of the present invention is by determining the fault level of each equipment in electric control system, the combination of corresponding equipment failure grade can be obtained, and according to the equipment failure grade combination obtained, the equipment failure grade combination of setting up in advance and the corresponding relation of system failure grade, and the corresponding relation of the system failure grade set up in advance and fault handling strategy, corresponding system failure grade and the fault handling strategy corresponding with the system failure grade determined can be determined, and according to the fault handling strategy determined, fault handling is carried out to described electric control system.That is; in technical scheme described in the embodiment of the present invention; corresponding system failure grade can be obtained by the combination of equipment failure grade; relative to the number dividing system fault level of prior art by faulty equipment; more rigorous, classification is more accurate; and in technical scheme described in the embodiment of the present invention, different safety precautions is proposed to different system fault level, thus substantially increase the security of electric control system.
Obviously, those skilled in the art can carry out various change and modification to the present invention and not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention.Like this, if these amendments of the present invention and modification belong within the scope of the claims in the present invention and equivalent technologies thereof, then the present invention is also intended to comprise these change and modification.This section is the final stage of instructions.
Claims (12)
1. a fault handling method, is characterized in that, described method comprises:
Determine the fault level of each equipment in electric control system, and according to the fault level of each equipment determined, obtain the combination of corresponding equipment failure grade;
Combine the corresponding relation with system failure grade according to the equipment failure grade combination obtained and the equipment failure grade set up in advance, determine to combine corresponding system failure grade with the described equipment failure grade obtained;
According to the corresponding relation of the system failure grade determined and the system failure grade set up in advance and fault handling strategy, determine the fault handling strategy corresponding with the described system failure grade determined, and according to the fault handling strategy determined, fault handling is carried out to described electric control system.
2. the method for claim 1, it is characterized in that, combine the corresponding relation with system failure grade according to the equipment failure grade combination obtained and the equipment failure grade set up in advance, determine to combine corresponding system failure grade with the described equipment failure grade obtained, comprising:
When the part or all of safety features moderate fault determined in described electric control system or when determining in described electric control system part or all of safety features severe fault, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is one-level;
When the whole safety features minor failure determined in described electric control system or part or all of main implement severe fault or whole main implement moderate fault or all Auxiliary equipment severe fault time, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is secondary;
When the Partial security proterctive equipment minor failure determined in described electric control system or part main implement moderate fault or whole main implement minor failure or part Auxiliary equipment severe fault or all Auxiliary equipment moderate fault time, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is three grades;
When determine the main implement minor failure of the part in described electric control system or part Auxiliary equipment moderate fault or partly or entirely Auxiliary equipment minor failure time, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is level Four;
Wherein, the fault severity level of level fault is greater than secondary failure, the fault severity level of secondary failure is greater than three grades of faults, and the fault severity level of three grades of faults is greater than level Four fault.
3. method as claimed in claim 2, is characterized in that,
For arbitrary equipment, when determining that described equipment exists accidental mistake, determine that described equipment is minor failure; When determine to judge described equipment whether fault time, determine that described equipment is moderate fault; When determining that described equipment is in malfunction, determine that described equipment is severe fault.
4. method as claimed in claim 2, it is characterized in that, according to the corresponding relation of the system failure grade determined and the system failure grade set up in advance and fault handling strategy, determine the fault handling strategy corresponding with the described system failure grade determined, and according to the fault handling strategy determined, fault handling is carried out to described electric control system, comprising:
If determine, the system failure grade of described electric control system is one-level, then lock described electric control system immediately, and report to the police;
If determine, the system failure grade of described electric control system is secondary, then immediately described electric control system is carried out to the restriction of corresponding dangerous play, and report to the police;
If determine, the system failure grade of described electric control system is three grades, then in the first preset duration, indicate described electric control system to work on, and report to the police;
If determine, the system failure grade of described electric control system is level Four, then in the second preset duration, indicate described electric control system to work on;
Wherein, described first preset duration is less than described second preset duration.
5. the method for claim 1, is characterized in that, described equipment at least comprise in following equipment any one or multiple: sensor, actuator or controller.
6. a fault treating apparatus, is characterized in that, described device comprises:
Equipment failure level determination module, for determining the fault level of each equipment in electric control system, and according to the fault level of each equipment determined, obtains the combination of corresponding equipment failure grade;
System failure level determination module, for the corresponding relation according to the equipment failure grade combination obtained and the equipment failure grade combination of setting up in advance and system failure grade, determine to combine corresponding system failure grade with the described equipment failure grade obtained;
Fault handling strategy determination module, for the corresponding relation according to the system failure grade determined and the system failure grade set up in advance and fault handling strategy, determines the fault handling strategy corresponding with the described system failure grade determined;
Processing module, carries out fault handling for the fault handling strategy determined according to described fault handling strategy determination module to described electric control system.
7. device as claimed in claim 6, is characterized in that,
Described system failure level determination module, specifically for when the part or all of safety features moderate fault determined in described electric control system or when determining in described electric control system part or all of safety features severe fault, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is one-level;
When the whole safety features minor failure determined in described electric control system or part or all of main implement severe fault or whole main implement moderate fault or all Auxiliary equipment severe fault time, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is secondary;
When the Partial security proterctive equipment minor failure determined in described electric control system or part main implement moderate fault or whole main implement minor failure or part Auxiliary equipment severe fault or all Auxiliary equipment moderate fault time, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is three grades;
When determine the main implement minor failure of the part in described electric control system or part Auxiliary equipment moderate fault or partly or entirely Auxiliary equipment minor failure time, determine that the system failure grade of described electric control system is level Four;
Wherein, the fault severity level of level fault is greater than secondary failure, the fault severity level of secondary failure is greater than three grades of faults, and the fault severity level of three grades of faults is greater than level Four fault.
8. device as claimed in claim 7, is characterized in that,
For arbitrary equipment, when determining that described equipment exists accidental mistake, determine that described equipment is minor failure; When determine to judge described equipment whether fault time, determine that described equipment is moderate fault; When determining that described equipment is in malfunction, determine that described equipment is severe fault.
9. device as claimed in claim 7, is characterized in that,
Described processing module, if specifically for determining that the system failure grade of described electric control system is one-level, then lock described electric control system immediately, and report to the police;
If determine, the system failure grade of described electric control system is secondary, then immediately described electric control system is carried out to the restriction of corresponding dangerous play, and report to the police;
If determine, the system failure grade of described electric control system is three grades, then in the first preset duration, indicate described electric control system to work on, and report to the police;
If determine, the system failure grade of described electric control system is level Four, then in the second preset duration, indicate described electric control system to work on;
Wherein, described first preset duration is less than described second preset duration.
10. device as claimed in claim 6, is characterized in that, described equipment at least comprise in following equipment any one or multiple: sensor, actuator or controller.
11. 1 kinds of electric control systems, is characterized in that, described electric control system comprises the arbitrary described fault treating apparatus of claim 6 ~ 10.
12. 1 kinds of fire fighting equipments, is characterized in that, described fire fighting equipment comprises electric control system according to claim 11.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510312187.3A CN105022382B (en) | 2015-06-09 | 2015-06-09 | A kind of fault handling method, device, system and fire-fighting equipment |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510312187.3A CN105022382B (en) | 2015-06-09 | 2015-06-09 | A kind of fault handling method, device, system and fire-fighting equipment |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN105022382A true CN105022382A (en) | 2015-11-04 |
| CN105022382B CN105022382B (en) | 2017-12-26 |
Family
ID=54412423
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510312187.3A Active CN105022382B (en) | 2015-06-09 | 2015-06-09 | A kind of fault handling method, device, system and fire-fighting equipment |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN105022382B (en) |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106569486A (en) * | 2016-11-15 | 2017-04-19 | 华晨汽车集团控股有限公司 | Fault warning evaluation system based on motor vehicle CAN network |
| CN106655744A (en) * | 2016-12-19 | 2017-05-10 | 南京南瑞继保电气有限公司 | Current limiting control method for rectifier bridges |
| CN107102184A (en) * | 2017-06-13 | 2017-08-29 | 湖南中车时代通信信号有限公司 | A kind of accident indicator |
| CN109515218A (en) * | 2018-10-30 | 2019-03-26 | 北京星航机电装备有限公司 | A kind of wisdom parking lot AGV automatic charging and maintenance mechanism |
| CN110371149A (en) * | 2019-08-12 | 2019-10-25 | 中车株洲电力机车有限公司 | The method and device of the malfunction monitoring of locomotive headlamp |
| WO2020037820A1 (en) * | 2018-08-23 | 2020-02-27 | 合肥好多帮信息科技有限公司 | Intelligent control system for fault repair reporting |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20080316013A1 (en) * | 2004-07-08 | 2008-12-25 | Andrew Corporation | Supervising Arrangement |
| CN103426062A (en) * | 2013-08-19 | 2013-12-04 | 上海欧显信息科技有限公司 | Fault grading and system maintaining method |
| CN103556664A (en) * | 2013-11-13 | 2014-02-05 | 山推工程机械股份有限公司 | Automatic fault protection method and system for bulldozer |
| CN103870716A (en) * | 2014-04-09 | 2014-06-18 | 杜玉龙 | Grading determination method of failure effect of fire-prevention facilities in building |
| CN104176060A (en) * | 2014-07-25 | 2014-12-03 | 湖南大学 | Whole vehicle fault graded processing method for electric vehicles |
-
2015
- 2015-06-09 CN CN201510312187.3A patent/CN105022382B/en active Active
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20080316013A1 (en) * | 2004-07-08 | 2008-12-25 | Andrew Corporation | Supervising Arrangement |
| CN103426062A (en) * | 2013-08-19 | 2013-12-04 | 上海欧显信息科技有限公司 | Fault grading and system maintaining method |
| CN103556664A (en) * | 2013-11-13 | 2014-02-05 | 山推工程机械股份有限公司 | Automatic fault protection method and system for bulldozer |
| CN103870716A (en) * | 2014-04-09 | 2014-06-18 | 杜玉龙 | Grading determination method of failure effect of fire-prevention facilities in building |
| CN104176060A (en) * | 2014-07-25 | 2014-12-03 | 湖南大学 | Whole vehicle fault graded processing method for electric vehicles |
Cited By (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106569486A (en) * | 2016-11-15 | 2017-04-19 | 华晨汽车集团控股有限公司 | Fault warning evaluation system based on motor vehicle CAN network |
| CN106655744A (en) * | 2016-12-19 | 2017-05-10 | 南京南瑞继保电气有限公司 | Current limiting control method for rectifier bridges |
| CN107102184A (en) * | 2017-06-13 | 2017-08-29 | 湖南中车时代通信信号有限公司 | A kind of accident indicator |
| WO2020037820A1 (en) * | 2018-08-23 | 2020-02-27 | 合肥好多帮信息科技有限公司 | Intelligent control system for fault repair reporting |
| CN109515218A (en) * | 2018-10-30 | 2019-03-26 | 北京星航机电装备有限公司 | A kind of wisdom parking lot AGV automatic charging and maintenance mechanism |
| CN109515218B (en) * | 2018-10-30 | 2021-07-20 | 北京星航机电装备有限公司 | Automatic AGV charging and overhauling mechanism for intelligent parking lot |
| CN110371149A (en) * | 2019-08-12 | 2019-10-25 | 中车株洲电力机车有限公司 | The method and device of the malfunction monitoring of locomotive headlamp |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN105022382B (en) | 2017-12-26 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN105022382A (en) | Fault processing method, apparatus and system and fire-fighting device | |
| CN104464158B (en) | Fire alarm linkage control method and system | |
| CN104122810A (en) | Controlling method of aircraft engine fire detection apparatus | |
| CN106741706A (en) | A kind of attitude of ship and drinking water measurement apparatus and its measuring method | |
| US10012684B2 (en) | Ground fault detection circuit | |
| JP7334150B2 (en) | Multiple Input Release Mechanism for Deployable Emergency Locator Transmitter and Flight Recorder | |
| US20110077803A1 (en) | Method and device for detecting piloting conflicts between the crew and the autopilot of an aircraft | |
| CN106841897A (en) | A kind of electric vehicle high-tension apparatus connection detection circuit | |
| KR20190099086A (en) | Thyristor valve test system based on software logical function collaboration | |
| KR20070109912A (en) | Method and device for monitoring a detector line of a fire detection system for faults | |
| CN103823401A (en) | Method and device for giving alarm in unit-level self start-stop control system | |
| CN108490907A (en) | A kind of vehicle-mounted self-test repair system | |
| CN103033648A (en) | Method for testing validity of output data of air sensor | |
| KR101773705B1 (en) | Ground monitoring device | |
| CN106647351A (en) | Redundancy switching circuit | |
| DE102012100348B4 (en) | DYNAMIC FLIGHT AND RESCUE CONTROL SYSTEM | |
| CN106463787A (en) | Method and device for increasing the safety during the use of battery systems | |
| CN210894407U (en) | Acceleration alarm system of new fuel container | |
| CN105510042A (en) | Ship diesel engine velocity measurement and security system | |
| KR102142653B1 (en) | Lamp Fault Detection System and Method of | |
| CN103420289A (en) | Automatic identification method, automatic identification device and crane | |
| CN101389381A (en) | Fire detection system and aircraft equipped with such a system | |
| WO2011161790A1 (en) | Elevator control system | |
| JPH10194007A (en) | Power supply interrupting device at vehicular collision | |
| CN209878961U (en) | Power battery system high-voltage electrical connection detection device |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| CP03 | Change of name, title or address | ||
| CP03 | Change of name, title or address |
Address after: 410200 No. 997, Section 2, Tengfei Road, Wangcheng District, Changsha City, Hunan Province Patentee after: Hunan Zoomlion emergency equipment Co., Ltd Patentee after: Zoomlion Co., Ltd Address before: No.997 Jinxing Road, Wangcheng District, Changsha City, Hunan Province Patentee before: Changsha Zhonglian fire fighting Machinery Co., Ltd Patentee before: Zoomlion Co., Ltd |