CN104980962B - A kind of determination method and device in field testing period - Google Patents
A kind of determination method and device in field testing period Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN104980962B CN104980962B CN201410133236.2A CN201410133236A CN104980962B CN 104980962 B CN104980962 B CN 104980962B CN 201410133236 A CN201410133236 A CN 201410133236A CN 104980962 B CN104980962 B CN 104980962B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- sampling period
- performance evaluation
- compliant
- comprehensive performance
- performance indicator
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W24/00—Supervisory, monitoring or testing arrangements
- H04W24/04—Arrangements for maintaining operational condition
Abstract
The present invention provides a kind of determination method and device in field testing period, is related to the communications field.Method includes: the performance indicator data for obtaining communication network and corresponding to each sampling period；The performance indicator number that will acquire is summarized, and the comprehensive performance evaluation in each sampling period is obtained；Determine non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；The field testing period of the communication network is determined according to the sampling period corresponding to non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation.The solution of the present invention can effectively and reasonably determine the field testing period of communication network, to solve the existing blindness for carrying out field testing.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to the determination method and devices in the communications field, especially field testing period.
Background technique
With the development of 2G, 3G and TD-LTE network, how in real time, accurately grasp whole network the case where, with
And how from the angle sensing network performance of user and evaluation network quality etc. be important ring that operator plans network
Section.Wherein, field testing is to verify network performance, assessment network quality, a main means for reflecting user's perception.
Field testing is actively developed in each operation commercial city at present, to ensure that the variation tendency of network quality is understood quickly in time
And find the network problem for influencing user's perception.But field testing needs to configure a large amount of test equipment and tester, also
It needs analog subscriber to carry out voice-and-data business, therefore puts into very big.And how to ensure the energy under limited testing time
Enough in time, the problem of comprehensively reflecting network quality, be current urgent need to resolve.
Summary of the invention
The technical problem to be solved in the present invention provides a kind of determination method and device in field testing period, can effectively,
The field testing period of communication network is reasonably determined, to solve the existing blindness for carrying out field testing.
In order to solve the above technical problems, the embodiment of the present invention provides a kind of determination method in field testing period, comprising:
Obtain the performance indicator data that communication network corresponds to each sampling period；
The performance indicator number that will acquire is summarized, and the comprehensive performance evaluation in each sampling period is obtained；
Determine non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
The outfield of the communication network is determined according to the sampling period corresponding to non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation
Test period.
Wherein, the performance indicator data have plurality of classes；
The step of performance indicator number that will acquire is summarized, obtains the comprehensive performance evaluation in each sampling period is specific
Include:
Different classes of performance indicator data are standardized, unified value interval is obtained；
Performance indicator data after all standardization for belonging to the same sampling period are summarized, each sampling week is obtained
The comprehensive performance evaluation of phase.
Wherein, the step of being standardized, obtain unified value interval different classes of performance indicator data is specific
Include:
According to formulaDifferent classes of performance indicator data are standardized respectively, are united
One value interval；
Wherein, X*For standardized target energy achievement data；X is the target energy achievement data before standardization；XminFor with work as
The smallest performance indicator data in preceding target energy achievement data same category；XmaxFor in current goal energy achievement data same class
Maximum energy achievement data in not.
Wherein, the communication network is divided into multiple grid regions；
According to formulaCalculate the different classes of performance that communication network corresponds to each sampling period
Achievement data；
Wherein, t is the sampling period；G is grid region；M is the quantity of grid region；The class of Z expression performance achievement data
Not.
Wherein, the performance indicator data of each classification are corresponding with weight；
Performance indicator data after all standardization for belonging to the same sampling period are summarized, are obtained with the sampling period
For dimension comprehensive performance evaluation the step of include:
All standardized achievement datas in same sampling period are weighted summation according to corresponding weight, are obtained every
The comprehensive performance evaluation in a sampling period.
Wherein, all standardized achievement datas in same sampling period are weighted summation according to corresponding weight,
The step of obtaining the comprehensive performance evaluation in each sampling period specifically includes:
According to weighted sum formulaCalculate the comprehensive performance evaluation of entire communication network；Its
In, N indicates the categorical measure of performance achievement data；XZ(t) indicate communication network using performance indicator data corresponding to period t
The numerical value of Z, QZIndicate weight corresponding to performance achievement data Z.
Wherein, before being standardized different classes of performance indicator data, which comprises
All abnormal performance indicator data are determined using box traction substation；
All abnormal performance indicator data are modified.
Wherein it is determined that out non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation the step of include:
According to the comprehensive performance evaluation in each sampling period, the quality control chart using the sampling period as time dimension is obtained；
Non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation is determined from the quality control chart according to preset rules；
Wherein, the preset rules include:
If KN- KN-1> 0 and KN-1- KN-2> 0, then by KNAs non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
If KN- KN-1< 0 and KN-1- KN-2< 0, then by KNAs non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
If | KN- KN-1| the first pre-determined threshold of >, then by KNAs non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
If | KN+1- KN-1| the second pre-determined threshold of >, then by KNAs non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
Wherein, N is effective serial number in sampling period, N >=2；KNFor the comprehensive performance evaluation in n-th sampling period.
Wherein, the sampling period according to corresponding to non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation determines the communication network
Field testing includes: the step of the period
It is determined according to the sampling period corresponding to non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation each non-compliant comprehensive
Close the interval time between performance evaluation；
Select a shortest interval time as the field testing period of the communication network.
In addition, the embodiment of the present invention also provides a kind of determining device in field testing period, comprising:
Module is obtained, the performance indicator data in each sampling period are corresponded to for obtaining communication network；
Summarizing module, the performance indicator number for will acquire are summarized, and the comprehensive performance in each sampling period is obtained
Evaluation；
First determining module, for determining non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
Second determining module determines institute for the sampling period according to corresponding to non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation
State the field testing period of communication network.
Wherein, the performance indicator data have plurality of classes；
The summarizing module specifically includes:
Normalizer module obtains unified value area for being standardized different classes of performance indicator data
Between；
Collects submodule, for converging the performance indicator data after all standardization for belonging to the same sampling period
Always, the comprehensive performance evaluation in each sampling period is obtained.
Wherein, the normalizer module is specifically used for:
According to formulaDifferent classes of performance indicator data are standardized respectively, are united
One value interval；
Wherein, X*For standardized target energy achievement data；X is the target energy achievement data before standardization；XminFor with work as
The smallest performance indicator data in preceding target energy achievement data same category；XmaxFor in current goal energy achievement data same class
Maximum energy achievement data in not.
Wherein, the communication network is divided into multiple grid regions；The acquisition module is specifically used for:
According to formulaCalculate the different classes of performance that communication network corresponds to each sampling period
Achievement data；
Wherein, t is the sampling period；G is grid region；M is the quantity of grid region；The class of Z expression performance achievement data
Not.
Wherein, the performance indicator data of each classification are corresponding with weight；
The collects submodule is specifically used for:
All standardized achievement datas in same sampling period are weighted summation according to corresponding weight, are obtained every
The comprehensive performance evaluation in a sampling period.
Wherein, the collects submodule is further used for:
According to weighted sum formulaCalculate the comprehensive performance evaluation of entire communication network；Its
In, N indicates the categorical measure of performance achievement data；XZ(t) indicate communication network using performance indicator data corresponding to period t
The numerical value of Z, QZIndicate weight corresponding to performance achievement data Z.
Wherein, the determining device further include:
Third determining module, for being standardized different classes of performance indicator data in the normalizer module
Before, all abnormal performance indicator data are determined using box traction substation；
Correction module, for being modified to all abnormal performance indicator data.
Wherein, first determining module specifically includes:
Drawing submodule is obtained for the comprehensive performance evaluation according to each sampling period using the sampling period as time dimension
The quality control chart of degree；
First determines submodule, non-compliant comprehensive for being determined from the quality control chart according to preset rules
Close performance evaluation；
Wherein, the preset rules include:
If KN- KN-1> 0 and KN-1- KN-2> 0, then by KNAs non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
If KN- KN-1< 0 and KN-1- KN-2< 0, then by KNAs non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
If | KN- KN-1| the first pre-determined threshold of >, then by KNAs non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
If | KN- KN-2| the second pre-determined threshold of >, then by KNAs non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
Wherein, N is effective serial number in sampling period, N >=2；KNFor the comprehensive performance evaluation in n-th sampling period.
Wherein, second determining module specifically includes:
Second determines submodule, determines for the sampling period according to corresponding to non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation
Interval time between each non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
Submodule is selected, for selecting a shortest interval time as the field testing period of the communication network.
Above scheme of the invention has the following beneficial effects:
The performance indicator data that the scheme of the present embodiment corresponds to collection period using communication network determine communication network as foundation
There is the time of quality problems in network.The field testing period is made according to the time that quality problems occurs in communication network later, from
And the development of field testing can be made more purposive, i.e., reflected with most reasonable time, least field testing frequency
Quality problems existing for communication network, and then reduce the input cost of field testing.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 is the step schematic diagram of the determination method in field testing period of the invention；
Fig. 2 is the quality control chart in the embodiment of the present invention；
Fig. 3 is the structural schematic diagram of the determining device in field testing period of the invention.
Specific embodiment
To keep the technical problem to be solved in the present invention, technical solution and advantage clearer, below in conjunction with attached drawing and tool
Body embodiment is described in detail.
The embodiment of the present invention provides a kind of outfield survey aiming at the problem that blindness that field testing in the prior art is carried out
The determination method in period is tried, as shown in Figure 1, comprising:
Step 11, the performance indicator data that communication network corresponds to each sampling period are obtained；
Step 12, the performance indicator number that will acquire is summarized, and the comprehensive performance evaluation in each sampling period is obtained；
Step 13, non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation is determined；
Step 14, the sampling period according to corresponding to non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation determines the communication network
The field testing period.
The performance indicator data that the method for the present embodiment corresponds to collection period using communication network determine communication network as foundation
There is the time of quality problems in network.The field testing period is made according to the time that quality problems occurs in communication network later, from
And the development of field testing can be made more purposive, i.e., reflected with most reasonable time, least field testing frequency
Quality problems existing for communication network, and then reduce the input cost of field testing.
Wherein, the performance indicator data source of the communication network of step 11 is acquired in actual outfield.Outfield acquisition is logical
Believe the most commonly seen work of industry, the performance indicator data of plurality of classes can be obtained.Specifically, it also to carry out in a step 11
The duplicate removal of data works, and deletes the duplicate performance indicator data of meaning, and finally therefrom choose and can reflect out communication network matter
Determination basis of the performance indicator data of amount as the field testing period, such as whole call successful rate, voice MOS mass, language
Sound RxQuality mass, percent of call completed, cutting off rate, average call setup delay etc..
Certainly, under the influence of some accidentalia, the performance indicator data collected are it is possible that numerical exception
The phenomenon that, these abnormal performance indicator data do not simply fail to accurately reflect network quality, also can be to outfield test period
Determination brings interference.Therefore preferably, all abnormal performances also are determined using box traction substation before step 12
Achievement data；It should be noted that different classes of performance indicator data have the numerical value of different number grade, therefore the present embodiment
Corresponding box traction substation is all produced to the performance indicator data of each classification.Since box traction substation is current identification data outliers
The most commonly used method, therefore repeat no more its concrete principle.Later, all abnormal performance indicator data are modified,
Such as made even equalization method using ensemble average number, mode and front and back sampling period.
In step 12, due to the disunity and the numerical value order of magnitude of specific performance indicator data present pattern and unit
Between greatly different problem, if it is uncertain to be directly used for summarizing the result that may be such that synthesis result performance evaluation, thus
Lose meaning.Therefore it needs to be standardized performance indicator data before summarizing, to obtain unified value interval；Standardization
Method can there are many kinds of, the method that can be realized as one, the present embodiment sample min-max standardized method to performance
Achievement data linear transformation makes it fall on the value interval of [0,1].Wherein, specific min-max standardization formula is
In above formula, X*For standardized target energy achievement data；X is the target energy achievement data before standardization；XminFor
With the smallest performance indicator data in current goal energy achievement data same category；XmaxIt is same in current goal energy achievement data
Maximum performance indicator data in one classification.
It should be noted that being all to divide communication network at present since the area coverage of communication network is extremely huge
After multiple grid regions, in the collecting work that each grid region synchronizes, so can only acquire with grid zone at present
Domain is the performance indicator data of granularity.Therefore, after above-mentioned standard step, it is also necessary to the performance indicator number of grid region
According to being polymerize, to obtain the corresponding different classes of performance indicator data of entire communication network.I.e. the present embodiment method according to
Aggregation formula:Calculate the different classes of performance indicator that communication network corresponds to each sampling period
Data；Wherein, t is the sampling period；G is grid region；M is the quantity of grid region；The classification of Z expression performance achievement data.
Illustratively, it is assumed that the outfield collection period of the present embodiment was 1 month, with the continuous 20 months collected performance indicator data of institute
For foundation, the determination work in field testing period is carried out.And performance indicator data specifically include whole call successful rate, voice
MOS mass, voice RxQuality mass, coverage rate, cutting off rate, average call setup delay this 6 class, then public according to polymerization
The algorithm of formula finally obtains the performance data index of the whole network in 6 classes corresponding 20 sampling periods.
In addition, different classes of performance indicator data are different in the significance level of reflection communication network quality, as preferred
The performance indicator data of each classification of scheme be corresponding with weight, by the property after all standardization for belonging to the same sampling period
Energy achievement data is summarized, and the comprehensive performance evaluation using the sampling period as dimension is obtained.
Illustratively, as shown in the table, different classes of performance indicator data can be made in advance according to the experience of expert
Weight:
Later, all standardized achievement datas in same sampling period are weighted summation according to corresponding weight,
Obtain the comprehensive performance evaluation in each sampling period.
For example, according to weighted sum formulaThe comprehensive performance for calculating entire communication network is commented
Valence；Wherein, N indicates that the categorical measure of performance achievement data, Z indicate the classification of performance achievement data, XZ(t) it is as previously mentioned
It crosses, indicates communication network in the numerical value using performance indicator data Z corresponding to period t, QZIt indicates corresponding to performance achievement data Z
Weight.Illustratively, or with the sampling period for one month, with the continuous 20 months collected performance indicator data of institute be according to
According to the determination work in progress field testing period.And performance indicator data specifically include whole call successful rate, voice MOS matter
Amount, voice RxQu ality mass, coverage rate, cutting off rate, average call setup delay this 6 class, then according to weighted sum public affairs
The algorithm of formula finally obtains the comprehensive performance evaluation in telecommunication network corresponding 20 sampling periods, the comprehensive performance evaluation value area
Between be [0,1].
Later, at step 14, as shown in Fig. 2, comprehensive performance evaluation with specific reference to each sampling period, obtains to adopt
The sample period is the quality control chart of time dimension；And it is determined not being inconsistent standardization from the quality control chart according to preset rules
The comprehensive performance evaluation comprehensive performance evaluation of control (i.e. de-)；
Assuming that N is effective serial number in sampling period, N >=2；KNFor the comprehensive performance evaluation in n-th sampling period.It is described pre-
If rule specifically includes:
If KN- KN-1> 0 and KN-1- KN-2> 0, then by KNAs non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；That is connect in Fig. 2
Continuous 3 points rise, then using third point as the comprehensive performance evaluation of de- control；
If KN- KN-1< 0 and KN-1- KN-2< 0, then by KNAs non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；That is connect in Fig. 2
It is risen under continuous 3 points, then using third point as the comprehensive performance evaluation of de- control；
If | KN- KN-1| the first pre-determined threshold of >, then using KN as non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；I.e. continuous
In two points, latter point is jumped with respect to former point more than the first pre-determined threshold, then using the latter point as the comprehensive performance of de- control
Evaluation；
If | KN+1- KN-1| the second pre-determined threshold of >, then by KNAs non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；I.e. even
In continuous three points, with respect to first point jump of last point is more than the second pre-determined threshold, then using the last point as the comprehensive of de- control
Close performance evaluation；
It can be seen that the comprehensive performance evaluation for taking off control in Fig. 2 occurred in November, 11,2 months 12 years, in June, 12,12 years 11
Month.The sampling period according to corresponding to the comprehensive performance evaluation of de- control determines that each non-compliant comprehensive performance is commented later
Interval time between valence；Select a shortest interval time as the field testing period of the communication network.Such as 11 years
Time interval of the November with respect to 2 months 12 years is 3 months, and the time interval in 2 months 12 years opposite in June, 12 is 4 months, in June, 12
The time interval in opposite in November, 12 is 5 months, it is determined that the field testing period is 3 months.
Certainly, based on the determination method in above-mentioned field testing period, different types of performance indicator number can be also arranged more
Kind weight scheme, and determine the candidate field testing period of each scheme, one the smallest candidate field testing week is selected later
Phase is as result the most final.
In conclusion in the field testing period determined through this embodiment, can find that the quality of communication network is asked in time
Topic.
In addition, the embodiment of the present invention also provides a kind of determining device in field testing period, include: as shown in Figure 3
Module is obtained, the performance indicator data in each sampling period are corresponded to for obtaining communication network；
Summarizing module, the performance indicator number for will acquire are summarized, and the comprehensive performance in each sampling period is obtained
Evaluation；
First determining module, for determining non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
Second determining module determines institute for the sampling period according to corresponding to non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation
State the field testing period of communication network.
The performance indicator data that the device of the present embodiment corresponds to collection period using communication network determine communication network as foundation
There is the time of quality problems in network.The field testing period is made according to the time that quality problems occurs in communication network later, from
And the development of field testing can be made more purposive, i.e., reflected with most reasonable time, least field testing frequency
Quality problems existing for communication network, and then reduce the input cost of field testing.
Wherein, the performance indicator data have plurality of classes；
The summarizing module specifically includes:
Normalizer module obtains unified value area for being standardized different classes of performance indicator data
Between；
Collects submodule, for converging the performance indicator data after all standardization for belonging to the same sampling period
Always, the comprehensive performance evaluation in each sampling period is obtained.
Wherein, the normalizer module is specifically used for:
According to formulaDifferent classes of performance indicator data are standardized respectively, are united
One value interval；
Wherein, X*For standardized target energy achievement data；X is the target energy achievement data before standardization；XminFor with work as
The smallest performance indicator data in preceding target energy achievement data same category；XmaxFor in current goal energy achievement data same class
Maximum energy achievement data in not.
Wherein, the communication network is divided into multiple grid regions；The acquisition module is specifically used for:
According to formulaCalculate the different classes of performance that communication network corresponds to each sampling period
Achievement data；
Wherein, t is the sampling period；G is grid region；M is the quantity of grid region；The class of Z expression performance achievement data
Not.
Wherein, the performance indicator data of each classification are corresponding with weight；
The collects submodule is specifically used for:
All standardized achievement datas in same sampling period are weighted summation according to corresponding weight, are obtained every
The comprehensive performance evaluation in a sampling period.
Wherein, the collects submodule is further used for:
According to weighted sum formulaCalculate the comprehensive performance evaluation of entire communication network；Its
In, N indicates the categorical measure of performance achievement data；XZ(t) indicate communication network using performance indicator data corresponding to period t
The numerical value of Z, QZIndicate weight corresponding to performance achievement data Z.
Wherein, the device of the present embodiment further include:
Third determining module, for being standardized different classes of performance indicator data in the normalizer module
Before, all abnormal performance indicator data are determined using box traction substation；
Correction module, for being modified to all abnormal performance indicator data.
Wherein, first determining module specifically includes:
Drawing submodule is obtained for the comprehensive performance evaluation according to each sampling period using the sampling period as time dimension
The quality control chart of degree；
First determines submodule, non-compliant comprehensive for being determined from the quality control chart according to preset rules
Close performance evaluation；
Wherein, the preset rules include:
If KN- KN-1> 0 and KN-1- KN-2> 0, then by KNAs non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
If KN- KN-1< 0 and KN-1- KN-2< 0, then by KNAs non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
If | KN- KN-1| the first pre-determined threshold of >, then by KNAs non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
If | KN- KN-2| the second pre-determined threshold of >, then by KNAs non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
Wherein, N is effective serial number in sampling period, N >=2；KNFor the comprehensive performance evaluation in n-th sampling period.
Wherein, second determining module specifically includes:
Second determines submodule, determines for the sampling period according to corresponding to non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation
Interval time between each non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
Submodule is selected, for selecting a shortest interval time as the field testing period of the communication network.
Obviously, the determining device of the present embodiment is corresponding with the determination method in above-mentioned field testing period, this method institute energy
The technical effect reached, the determining device of the present embodiment also can equally reach.In addition, for convenience of description, above-mentioned determination
Device is to be divided into various modules with function to describe respectively.It certainly, in carrying out the present invention can be the function of each module same
It is realized in one or more software and/or hardwares.
It should be noted that for convenience of description, description apparatus above is to be divided into various units with function to describe respectively.
Certainly, the function of each unit can be realized in the same or multiple software and or hardware in carrying out the present invention.
The above is a preferred embodiment of the present invention, it is noted that for those skilled in the art
For, without departing from the principles of the present invention, it can also make several improvements and retouch, these improvements and modifications
It should be regarded as protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (16)
1. a kind of determination method in field testing period characterized by comprising
Obtain the performance indicator data that communication network corresponds to each sampling period；
The performance indicator number that will acquire is summarized, and the comprehensive performance evaluation in each sampling period is obtained, comprising: by inhomogeneity
Other performance indicator data are standardized, and obtain unified value interval；All standardization in same sampling period will be belonged to
Performance indicator data afterwards are summarized, and the comprehensive performance evaluation in each sampling period is obtained；
Determine non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
The field testing of the communication network is determined according to the sampling period corresponding to non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation
Period.
2. determining method according to claim 1, which is characterized in that different classes of performance indicator data are carried out standard
The step of changing, obtaining unified value interval specifically includes:
According to formulaDifferent classes of performance indicator data are standardized respectively, that is unified takes
It is worth section；
Wherein, X*For standardized target energy achievement data；X is the target energy achievement data before standardization；XminFor with current mesh
The smallest performance indicator data in mark energy achievement data same category；XmaxFor in current goal energy achievement data same category
Maximum energy achievement data.
3. determining method according to claim 1, which is characterized in that the communication network is divided into multiple grid regions；
According to formulaCalculate the different classes of performance indicator number that communication network corresponds to each sampling period
According to；
Wherein, t is the sampling period；G is grid region；M is the quantity of grid region；The classification of z expression performance achievement data；zg
(t) indicate that grid region g corresponds to the classification of the performance indicator data of sampling period t.
4. determining method according to claim 3, which is characterized in that the performance indicator data correspondence of each classification is had the right
Weight；
Performance indicator data after all standardization for belonging to the same sampling period are summarized, are obtained with the sampling period as dimension
The step of comprehensive performance evaluation of degree includes:
All standardized achievement datas in same sampling period are weighted summation according to corresponding weight, obtain each adopt
The comprehensive performance evaluation in sample period.
5. determining method according to claim 4, which is characterized in that by all standardized indexs in same sampling period
The step of data are weighted summation according to corresponding weight, obtain the comprehensive performance evaluation in each sampling period specifically includes:
According to weighted sum formulaCalculate the comprehensive performance evaluation of entire communication network；Wherein, N
Indicate the categorical measure of performance achievement data；XZ(t) indicate communication network using performance indicator data Z's corresponding to period t
Numerical value, QZIndicate weight corresponding to performance achievement data Z.
6. determining method according to claim 1-5, which is characterized in that by different classes of performance indicator number
Before being standardized, which comprises
All abnormal performance indicator data are determined using box traction substation；
All abnormal performance indicator data are modified.
7. determining method according to claim 1, which is characterized in that determine non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation
Step includes:
According to the comprehensive performance evaluation in each sampling period, the quality control chart using the sampling period as time dimension is obtained；
Non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation is determined from the quality control chart according to preset rules；
Wherein, the preset rules include:
If KN- KN-1> 0 and KN-1- KN-2> 0, then by KNAs non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
If KN- KN-1< 0 and KN-1- KN-2< 0, then by KNAs non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
If | KN- KN-1| the first pre-determined threshold of >, then by KNAs non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
If | KN+1- KN-1| the second pre-determined threshold of >, then by KNAs non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
Wherein, N is effective serial number in sampling period, N >=2；KNFor the comprehensive performance evaluation in n-th sampling period.
8. determining method according to claim 1, which is characterized in that right according to non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation institute
The sampling period answered determines that the step of field testing period of the communication network includes:
It is determined according to the sampling period corresponding to non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation each non-compliant comprehensive
Interval time between capable of evaluating；
Select a shortest interval time as the field testing period of the communication network.
9. a kind of determining device in field testing period characterized by comprising
Module is obtained, the performance indicator data in each sampling period are corresponded to for obtaining communication network；The performance indicator data
With plurality of classes；
Summarizing module, the performance indicator number for will acquire are summarized, and the comprehensive performance evaluation in each sampling period is obtained,
Include: normalizer module, for being standardized different classes of performance indicator data, obtains unified value interval；
Collects submodule obtains every for summarizing the performance indicator data after all standardization for belonging to the same sampling period
The comprehensive performance evaluation in a sampling period；
First determining module, for determining non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
Second determining module is determined described logical for the sampling period according to corresponding to non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation
The field testing period of communication network.
10. determining device according to claim 9, which is characterized in that the normalizer module is specifically used for:
According to formulaDifferent classes of performance indicator data are standardized respectively, that is unified takes
It is worth section；
Wherein, X*For standardized target energy achievement data；X is the target energy achievement data before standardization；XminFor with current mesh
The smallest performance indicator data in mark energy achievement data same category；XmaxFor in current goal energy achievement data same category
Maximum energy achievement data.
11. determining device according to claim 9, which is characterized in that the communication network is divided into multiple grid regions；
The acquisition module is specifically used for:
According to formulaCalculate the different classes of performance indicator number that communication network corresponds to each sampling period
According to；
Wherein, t is the sampling period；G is grid region；M is the quantity of grid region；The classification of z expression performance achievement data；zg
(t) indicate that grid region g corresponds to the classification of the performance indicator data of sampling period t.
12. determining device according to claim 10, which is characterized in that the performance indicator data of each classification are corresponding with
Weight；
The collects submodule is specifically used for:
All standardized achievement datas in same sampling period are weighted summation according to corresponding weight, obtain each adopt
The comprehensive performance evaluation in sample period.
13. determining device according to claim 12, which is characterized in that the collects submodule is further used for:
According to weighted sum formulaCalculate the comprehensive performance evaluation of entire communication network；Wherein, N
Indicate the categorical measure of performance achievement data；XZ(t) indicate communication network using performance indicator data Z's corresponding to period t
Numerical value, QZIndicate weight corresponding to performance achievement data Z.
14. according to the described in any item determining devices of claim 9-13, which is characterized in that further include:
Third determining module, for before different classes of performance indicator data are standardized by the normalizer module,
All abnormal performance indicator data are determined using box traction substation；
Correction module, for being modified to all abnormal performance indicator data.
15. determining device according to claim 9, which is characterized in that first determining module specifically includes:
Drawing submodule is obtained for the comprehensive performance evaluation according to each sampling period using the sampling period as time dimension
Quality control chart；
First determines submodule, non-compliant comprehensive for being determined from the quality control chart according to preset rules
It can evaluation；
Wherein, the preset rules include:
If KN- KN-1> 0 and KN-1- KN-2> 0, then by KNAs non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
If KN- KN-1< 0 and KN-1- KN-2< 0, then by KNAs non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
If | KN- KN-1| the first pre-determined threshold of >, then by KNAs non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
If | KN- KN-2| the second pre-determined threshold of >, then by KNAs non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
Wherein, N is effective serial number in sampling period, N >=2；KNFor the comprehensive performance evaluation in n-th sampling period.
16. determining device according to claim 9, which is characterized in that second determining module specifically includes:
Second determines submodule, determines for the sampling period according to corresponding to non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation each
Interval time between non-compliant comprehensive performance evaluation；
Submodule is selected, for selecting a shortest interval time as the field testing period of the communication network.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201410133236.2A CN104980962B (en) | 2014-04-03 | 2014-04-03 | A kind of determination method and device in field testing period |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201410133236.2A CN104980962B (en) | 2014-04-03 | 2014-04-03 | A kind of determination method and device in field testing period |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN104980962A CN104980962A (en) | 2015-10-14 |
| CN104980962B true CN104980962B (en) | 2019-04-30 |
Family
ID=54276929
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201410133236.2A Active CN104980962B (en) | 2014-04-03 | 2014-04-03 | A kind of determination method and device in field testing period |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN104980962B (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109756358B (en) * | 2017-11-08 | 2020-11-06 | 华为技术有限公司 | Sampling frequency recommendation method, device, equipment and storage medium |
| CN112433908B (en) * | 2020-10-29 | 2022-07-12 | 苏州浪潮智能科技有限公司 | Method, system, device and medium for determining interval time of detection server |
Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5878209A (en) * | 1992-12-02 | 1999-03-02 | Motorola, Inc. | Apparatus and method for identifying a failed subscriber unit in a wireless communication system |
| CN101931984A (en) * | 2009-06-18 | 2010-12-29 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method, user equipment and base station for drive test measurement |
| CN102365882A (en) * | 2011-06-13 | 2012-02-29 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method, equipment and system for overlaying network in monitoring room |
| CN102781021A (en) * | 2012-07-03 | 2012-11-14 | 北京邮电大学 | Self-adaptation regulation measurement period implement method of log type minimization of drive tests (MDT) |
| CN103698489A (en) * | 2013-12-30 | 2014-04-02 | 力合科技（湖南）股份有限公司 | Verification method and device of test data |
| CN103701657A (en) * | 2012-09-28 | 2014-04-02 | 中国银联股份有限公司 | Device and method for monitoring and processing dysfunction of continuously running data processing system |
-
2014
- 2014-04-03 CN CN201410133236.2A patent/CN104980962B/en active Active
Patent Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5878209A (en) * | 1992-12-02 | 1999-03-02 | Motorola, Inc. | Apparatus and method for identifying a failed subscriber unit in a wireless communication system |
| CN101931984A (en) * | 2009-06-18 | 2010-12-29 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method, user equipment and base station for drive test measurement |
| CN102365882A (en) * | 2011-06-13 | 2012-02-29 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method, equipment and system for overlaying network in monitoring room |
| CN102781021A (en) * | 2012-07-03 | 2012-11-14 | 北京邮电大学 | Self-adaptation regulation measurement period implement method of log type minimization of drive tests (MDT) |
| CN103701657A (en) * | 2012-09-28 | 2014-04-02 | 中国银联股份有限公司 | Device and method for monitoring and processing dysfunction of continuously running data processing system |
| CN103698489A (en) * | 2013-12-30 | 2014-04-02 | 力合科技（湖南）股份有限公司 | Verification method and device of test data |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN104980962A (en) | 2015-10-14 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Cortés et al. | Analysis of the indoor broadband power-line noise scenario | |
| CN101951617B (en) | Mobile network communication quality evaluation method based on analytic hierarchy process | |
| US10698371B2 (en) | Systems and methods for classifying in-situ sensor response data patterns representative of grid pathology severity | |
| CN106535204B (en) | A kind of service coverage method for evaluating quality and device | |
| CN107229559A (en) | For the detection method and device of the test integrity degree of operation system | |
| CN103750552B (en) | A kind of intelligent sampling method and the application controlled at quality cigarette thereof | |
| CN106788587A (en) | A kind of determination method and device of interference type | |
| CN115398770A (en) | Automatic discovery of power supply network topology and phases | |
| CN108445313B (en) | Comprehensive prediction method for electromagnetic radiation effect of frequency equipment and terminal equipment | |
| CN103942725A (en) | Power quality early-warning index screening method | |
| CN104980962B (en) | A kind of determination method and device in field testing period | |
| CN102792174B (en) | Instrument and method for detecting partial electrical discharges | |
| CN110457175A (en) | Business data processing method, device, electronic equipment and medium | |
| CN109032954A (en) | A kind of user's choosing method, device, storage medium and the terminal of A/B test | |
| CN106019098A (en) | Partial discharge positioning method, device and system | |
| CN105891701B (en) | A kind of score filtering wave by prolonging time device delay performance test method and its test device | |
| CN102955888A (en) | Analysis method and device of equipment defects | |
| CN108243439A (en) | The method and system of mobile Internet data service quality deterioration positioning | |
| CN104821854B (en) | A kind of many primary user's multidimensional frequency spectrum sensing methods based on random set | |
| Eidson et al. | An evaluation of the extent of correlation between interharmonic and voltage fluctuation measurements | |
| Argon et al. | Inferring the periodicity in large-scale Internet measurements | |
| CN103618287A (en) | Lightning protection method and system | |
| CN108112056A (en) | The frequency sweeping method and device of user terminal | |
| CN115267641A (en) | Method and system for identifying error abnormity of current transformer in same-tower double-circuit power transmission line | |
| CN106332115B (en) | A kind of Intermodulation Interference localization method, device and system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |