CN104680450A - Peer assessment device and application thereof - Google Patents
Peer assessment device and application thereof Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN104680450A CN104680450A CN201510063727.9A CN201510063727A CN104680450A CN 104680450 A CN104680450 A CN 104680450A CN 201510063727 A CN201510063727 A CN 201510063727A CN 104680450 A CN104680450 A CN 104680450A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- evaluation
- module
- companion
- group
- report
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to a peer assessment device and application thereof. The peer assessment device is characterized by comprising a database module, a user management module, an assessment item management module, a synchronous assessment module, a report checking module and a report viewing module. Compared with the prior art, the peer assessment device has the advantages that complete anonymity is achieved, and group members can make critical assessment; assessment results are directly stored into a database, so that the peer assessment efficiency is greatly improved, the workload of teachers is reduced, the publication of peer assessment reports is accelerated, and the group members can conveniently and timely know the assessment and the suggestions of the other members and timely know own comprehensive performance in groups; peer assessment can be implemented after class, so that precious class time is saved; the additional consumption of a paper assessment table is avoided, and the arrangement of persons special for paper assessment report collection, summarization, input and calculation is avoided.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to field of Educational Technology, especially relate to a kind of for realize companion evaluate device and application.
Background technology
Traditional teaching mainly teacher is taught, and students' participation, the interaction mainly between Faculty and Students, existing teaching assessment system also relates generally to evaluation of teacher student and student assessment teacher.Companion's teaching is the modern education theory that your professor of Harvard University Eric Mazu proposes, use custom-designed for disclosing the Concept Testing topic that students concepts mistake and guiding student are deeply probed into, computer response interactive system or option card, guiding student participates in teaching process, become the single instruction of tradition into probing into based on the autonomous learning and cooperation that dissect concept, a kind of students'autonomous study is constructed at top class in a kindergarten's classroom teaching, cooperative learning, raw interactive, the creating new teaching models of classroom interactions, and promote pilot in Ge great colleges and universities at home and abroad, achieve good effect.
Companion's teaching is mainly through the method for point group, group member to cooperate study as a collective, a lateral comparison is had between group, playing an active part in of group member has extremely important impact to the achievement of group, in order to promote that group's overall strength promotes, need the method mutually evaluated by little group member, analyze oneself deficiency and advantage, provide the analysis to group member and suggestion, particularly be given in the mutual evaluation in group, by such evaluation method, group member can be allowed to understand oneself contribution to group, and the deficiency of oneself can be obtained over there from other member.
Existing group assessment method is mainly by printing evaluation table, similar student shows evaluation of teacher, in several below running in actual evaluation process, the group assessment is filled in because workload is large and be pressed for time of poor quality in scene, classroom, the evaluation table of papery is easy to be seen cannot accomplish anonymity by other member of group in collection process, in group, all members comment mutually, consumption evaluation table is many, afterwards teacher statistics and data inputting workload large, student cannot obtain the result of the group assessment very first time, and group synchronously evaluates and falls flat.
Computing machine and internet are applied more and more extensive in education sector, student is by computing machine accessing Internet, various application on access teaching website and instrument are widely, the such as patent No. 200810161007.6 proposes a kind of learning support system and learning evaluation method thereof, self-assessment can be carried out, classmate evaluates and evaluation of teacher, constantly can evaluate in learning process, and consider that fairness only shows user name, and system can carry out just evaluation and analysis automatically, generate general comment mark, evaluation result is analyzed, and recommendation on improvement is provided, student also can understand oneself evaluation result and recommendation on improvement in time.But also there are the following problems for the method that this patent provides: 1, student assessment reference be other classmate's task performance, ask a question and problem answers, and in companion's teaching, imparted knowledge to students by division group, group member needs to work in coordination with together to finish the work, what need key evaluation is the behavior of group member in whole learning process, and is not only last result; 2, recommendation on improvement is also provided by system, and the suggestion of companion's study, the good place needing group member mutually to provide to do and area for improvement, fully whether suggestion comprise and participate in enthusiasm, to prepare, whether actively deliver suggestion and participative group is discussed; 3, for some sensitive words of evaluation suggesting system for wearing None-identified of student, need to increase teacher and check evaluation suggestion link; 4, evaluation result is divided outstanding, good, medium, several and is failed, the inner relative evaluation of group of can not embodying, and the evaluation total score of each student to group member is 0, needs to provide relative performance good and relative performance's difference; 5, lack for the evaluation of group inside class, group, as a team, needs to evaluate the general performance of group.
Patent 201310550027.3 proposes a kind of method and system supporting interactive cooperative learning in addition, support to divide into groups to member, determine information about firms in a group, the method of interactive cooperative learning is proposed, main still for online group learning, improve the enthusiasm that member participates in on-line study, improve learning efficiency, but do not provide the method for learning evaluation in group.
Summary of the invention
Object of the present invention be exactly in order to overcome above-mentioned prior art exist defect and provide a kind of for realize companion evaluate device and application.
Object of the present invention can be achieved through the following technical solutions:
For realizing the device that companion evaluates, it is characterized in that, comprising database module, user management module, assessment item administration module, synchronous evaluation module, report check module and report and checking module;
Described database module is each model calling with other respectively, for preserving user profile, project information and evaluation result information;
Described user management module is connected with database module, for realizing user's registration and user management;
Described assessment item administration module checks model calling with database module, report check module, synchronous evaluation module and report respectively, completes evaluation for setting different projects for student by companion's evaluation module;
Described companion's evaluation module checks model calling with database module, report check module, assessment item administration module and report respectively, for being supplied to the interface that user carries out evaluating;
Described report check module connects with database module, assessment item administration module and synchronous evaluation module respectively, for completing the inspection to user's evaluation result, and issues report;
Described report check module respectively with database module, synchronous evaluation module, assessment item administration module and connection, for checking the appraisal report of specific project for user.
Described user profile comprises school, class and group.
Described user management comprises: to student, teacher and keeper's granted rights; Class creates, and distributes student and teacher the class to correspondence; Create the group under class, distribute student to corresponding group.
Described evaluation comprises member's comprehensive evaluation, member's relative evaluation and the group assessment.
Described companion's evaluation module, when user completes member's comprehensive evaluation, checks all items of comprehensive evaluation, guarantees that all items completes and fills in; If there is project to be empty, then warned and required user's correction; If be not all empty, then preserve this member's comprehensive evaluation.
Described member's comprehensive evaluation comprise this member whether actively, careful preparation whether fully, panel discussion whether fully, the group that whether actively the completes task of distributing and provide suggestion, whether listen attentively to others' suggestion and actively correct, good place that this member does and provide this member's area for improvement.
Described companion's evaluation module, when user completes member's relative evaluation, checks whether the score sum of all members is 0, if not 0, is then warned and require user's correction; If 0, then preserve this member's relative evaluation.
The inspection of described report check module to user's evaluation result is specially: check in the report submitting to the progress of appraisal report and inspection to submit to and whether use sensitive word or band insult words.
Described report checks that module checks appraisal report by two kinds of modes for user: webpage mode and the PDF way of output.
For realizing an application for companion's evaluating apparatus, it is characterized in that, comprising the following steps:
(1) build companion and evaluate server, office terminal creates class in user management module, and teachers and students' user account corresponding for this class is imported database module;
(2) teacher side logs in companion and evaluates server, creates group, and student is assigned in different groups;
(3) teacher side creates companion's assessment item from assessment item administration module, and sets current student assessment project and current teacher's inspection item;
(4) student side logs in companion and evaluates server, enters companion's evaluation module, checks group member, clicks different group members, completes the member's comprehensive evaluation to all group members, shows member's relative evaluation button after completing;
(5) student side clicks member's relative evaluation button carry out member's relative evaluation, all member's relative evaluations of guarantee group and be allow to submit to after 0;
(6), after student side completes group member's relative evaluation, click group assessment button, group is evaluated and submits to;
(7) teacher side logs in companion and evaluates server, and from report check module check, each group companion evaluates performance, and checks in comprehensive evaluation whether comprise responsive words and phrases, after teacher checks amendment, the report of this assessment item is issued;
(8) student logs in companion and evaluates server, checks that module checks companion's appraisal report of this project oneself from report.
Compared with prior art, the present invention has the following advantages:
1, student can log in companion's evaluation system after class and evaluates, companion's evaluation system ensures companion's evaluation quality by setting inspection condition, after all members of group evaluate submission, teacher can modify to the responsive words and phrases in evaluation and preserve database, the final report (FR) quality that student sees is good, and report in group member praise and suggestion random display, realize full energy matries, group member can provide pertinent evaluation.
2, companion evaluates is directly be saved in database, as long as all members of group have submitted report, teacher directly can log in companion's evaluation system and carries out checking and issue report, in report, companion's evaluation result directly can be calculated according to predetermined algorithm by system, the instrument re-using other is not needed to carry out calculating and gathering, companion's evaluation procedure compared with papery wants fast, greatly improves the efficiency that companion evaluates
3, companion evaluates and can carry out after class, saves valuable time in classroom; Do not need additionally to consume papery evaluation table, do not need to arrange special messenger to carry out the collection of papery appraisal report, gather, input, calculate.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is that the companion of this device evaluates server and management end, graph of a relation between teacher side and student side;
Fig. 2 is that the companion of this device evaluates main modular and intermodule relation on server;
Fig. 3 is that student logs in companion and evaluates server display interface treatment scheme.
Embodiment
Below in conjunction with the drawings and specific embodiments, the present invention is described in detail.
Embodiment 1
Companion evaluates server 11 and comprises background system and foreground system, background system is made up of database module 21, user management module 22, by assessment item administration module 23, synchronous evaluation module 24, report check module 25 and report, foreground system checks that module 26 is formed, student 12, teacher 13 and keeper 14 are all connected through the internet to this device, as shown in Figure 1.
Database module 21, for preserving all schools, class, group, project information, also for preserving all companion's evaluation tables, preserving all group assessment tables, preserve all member companions and evaluate integrate score result, and other modules all having alternately.
User management module 22, support to carry out user's registration by name and mailbox, keeper authorizes the different rights such as student, teacher and keeper to the user of new registration; Support to create class, student and teacher are assigned to corresponding class; Support each group creating class subordinate, facilitate teacher class middle school student to be assigned in different groups, and can adjust in time according to the grouping situation on actual classroom.
Assessment item administration module 23, mainly teacher creates the new project to be assessed of this class, teacher can set Evaluation: Current project, setting current audit project, setting class member can consult appraisal report project, and it is all for the performance of specific project evaluation group member in this project that all companions evaluate.
Companion's evaluation module 24, comprises member's comprehensive evaluation, member's relative evaluation and the group assessment.Member's comprehensive evaluation mainly allows student comprise oneself to every member in group and evaluates qualitatively, actively whether primary evaluation group member participative group movable, careful preparation whether fully, panel discussion whether fully, the group that whether actively the completes task of distributing provide suggestion, whether listen attentively to others' suggestion and actively correct, the good place that provides that group member does, provide group member's area for improvement etc.Member's evaluation table checks when submitting to, guarantees all must all filling in by entry item; Member's relative evaluation mainly allows student provide the relative evaluation of all members in group, evaluation comprises-3 ,-2 ,-1,0,1,2,3, default value is 0, range of value also can increase or reduce, and needs to ensure the evaluation score of all members and is 0, checks when group member submits relative evaluation to, if be not 0 do not allow submit to, evaluation score is just referring to that member is that front is positive to group, and it is relatively good to show, negative fraction representation performance relative mistake; The group assessment mainly allows this group of student assessment integrally general performance in certain project, evaluation of estimate scope is 0,1,2,3, also can increase or reduce, and default value is 0, mark is high, illustrates that group member thinks that oneself group general performance in this project is better.
Report check module 25, mainly allows teacher check the report that members all in Evaluation: Current project submit to, and whether main inspection group member turns in a report, and checks in the report submitted to and whether uses some susceptibility or band insult words.
Module 26 is checked in report, the companion mainly allowing student inquire about oneself specific project evaluates and comprises, by relevant evaluation content in Query Database, calculate the relative score of this student and show on webpage, and by the evaluation and recommendations random display of group member on webpage, support that PDF (Portable Document Format, portable document format) form report exports simultaneously, convenient preserve and mail sending to the mailbox of student oneself.Teacher can inquire about the report of all member's specific projects of class.
Between modules, relation as shown in Figure 2.Database module 21 and user management module 22 are the basic modules in companion's evaluation method; Assessment item administration module 23 sets different projects, completes companion evaluate and group assessment operation to facilitate student by companion's evaluation module 24; Report check module 25 completes student companion evaluation test, and issues report; Student and teacher pass through report and check that module 26 checks companion's appraisal report of the last group member produced, companion's evaluation technical proposal flow process that common formation one is complete.
Be below the specific works principle of apparatus of the present invention:
The first step, build companion and evaluate server, HTTP (Hypertext transfer protocol in internet is provided, HTML (Hypertext Markup Language)) service, keeper logs in companion by internet terminal and evaluates server, creates new class, import the student of this class and teacher's list and create user account, the student of setting user account and teacher role, and activate account, notify that student and teacher's login system participate in companion and evaluate.
Second step, teacher logs in companion by internet terminal and evaluates server, creates group, and class student is assigned in different groups.Also can adjust existing group member.
3rd step, teacher creates companion's assessment item, and sets current student assessment project and current teacher's inspection item.
4th step, student logs in companion by internet terminal and evaluates server, checks group member, click different group members, complete the member's comprehensive evaluation to all group members, after group's comprehensive evaluation is all submitted to, display member relative evaluation button.
5th step, student completes after all member's comprehensive evaluation submits to, clicks member relative evaluation button, completes the evaluation to all members of group, all member's relative evaluations of guarantee group and be allow to submit to after 0.If student does not carry out this step, then giving tacit consent to the relative evaluation of all members of group is 0.
6th step, after student completes group member's relative evaluation, clicks group assessment button, evaluates and submit to group.If student does not carry out this step, then giving tacit consent to the group assessment is 0.
7th step, teacher logs in companion by internet terminal and evaluates server, check that each group companion evaluates performance, and check in comprehensive evaluation whether comprise irritated words and phrases, after teacher checks amendment, the report of this assessment item is issued, and close this project continuation evaluation, after avoiding report to issue, student revises companion's comprehensive evaluation or relative evaluation again.
8th step, log in companion by internet terminal after student is notified and evaluate server, the project of percussion cloth, checks companion's appraisal report of this project oneself, click the appraisal report that PDF button can show PDF, will report that local preservation or mail sending are to oneself mailbox.
The companion of same class next round evaluates can from above-mentioned second step, teacher logs in companion by internet terminal and evaluates server, group's dividing condition according to new round companion study adjusts group member in database, then continues later step.In step 4, after student logs in, except the evaluation of a new round can be carried out, last round of appraisal report can also be checked.Shown in figure 3.
Embodiment 2
This enforcement hardware module part mainly comprises companion and evaluates server, in the present embodiment, companion evaluates server and employs Harvard University's public server, run (SuSE) Linux OS, enter the Internet, support HTTP service, and support PHP (Hypertext Preprocessor, HyperText Preprocessor) dynamic web page technique, support MySQL (Relational DBMS) database; Student, teacher and keeper evaluate server by the computer login companion of accessing Internet.
Main implementation step is as follows:
Step one, install Drupal (a Content Management delivery system of increasing income) nucleus module on the server, and configure MySQL database use, after use management person logs in Drupal system, the functional modules such as view enhancing, structure reference, date enhancing are installed, and increase student, teacher and keeper three roles, and create new structure type, comprise class, group, assessment item, companion's evaluation, the group assessment, wherein mainly comprise class name and class's numbering in class structure, can support that multiple class uses companion's evaluation system simultaneously.
Wherein comprise group name in group structure, field that little group # and one point to class, to distinguish the group under different class.
Wherein comprise project name in assessment item structure, bullets, project commencement date and deadline, comprise current project mark, inspection item mark, issue project mark three mark, whether whether be Evaluation: Current project for indicating this project, whether is teacher's current check project, be the project issued, comprise the field that is pointed to class in assessment item, for distinguishing different class simultaneously.
Companion's evaluation structure is this patent core texture, comprise that companion evaluates title, points to project structure field, points to group structure field, points to group member's field, comprehensive evaluation field (comprise that group member participative group is movable whether actively, careful preparation whether fully, panel discussion whether fully, the group that whether actively the completes task of distributing and provide suggestion, whether listen attentively to others' suggestion and actively correct, the good place that provides that group member does, provide group member's area for improvement), relative evaluation field.
Group assessment structure comprises title, points to project structure field, points to group structure field, points to evaluation personnel's texture field and evaluate score field.
Use user's import feature of Drupal, the class Member Users editted is imported, comprise member name, mailbox, class number, role, user will be imported activate, and log in link first to the transmission of all importing subscriber mailboxs, notify that related personnel logs in companion's evaluation system, and set user cipher when first time logs in.
Step 2, teacher use the new link activated in mailbox to log in first, setting code is required according to Drupal, create new multiple groups, and use Drupal to provide view to show and filtering function, by arranging filtercondition, comparison each user class field and log in teacher class field, guarantees that teacher only shows the member of this class.The table the edited module using Drupal to provide, modifies to the group of this class member, member is joined in different groups.
Step 3, teacher create multiple assessment item, set different evaluation project commencement date and deadline, the view utilizing Drupal to provide equally display and filtering function, by arranging filtercondition, comparison each project class field and log in teacher class field, shows current class all items.The table the edited module using Drupal to provide is set as current companion's assessment item and current teacher's inspection item the assessment item of current date.
Step 4, student uses the new link activated in mailbox to log in first, setting code is required according to Drupal, then all group members are shown, also the view display utilizing Drupal to provide and filtering function, by arranging filtercondition, the class of each user of comparison and little group field, only show and log in the member of the same class of student and group, PHP code supported by Drupal view, when display group member, check and be provided with Evaluation: Current project when this class in database, if be provided with Evaluation: Current project, increase a link then to each group member's name, by whether there being the evaluation information to this group member in PHP code check database, if, do not point to newly-built companion to evaluate link, if had, then point to renewal companion and evaluate link, ensure that student can preserve synchronous evaluation information in real time.If there is no Evaluation: Current item setup in database, then point out student to wait for the group assessment, increase link to each group member's name.In addition, if group member's name of display is consistent with the student's name logged in, use red font to increase remarks after member name, indicating is oneself.Treatment scheme as shown in Figure 3.
Evaluate in the page newly-built or renewal companion, student can carry out detailed comprehensive evaluation for group companion, wherein whether the activity of group member participative group is positive, whether careful preparation is abundant, whether panel discussion is abundant, the task that the group that whether actively completes distributes also provides suggestion, whether listen attentively to others to advise and actively correct being evaluated by individual event selection mode, for the good place providing group member and do, provide group member's area for improvement to need to support Characters, and carry out validity checking by webpage embedded Javascript when submission comprehensive evaluation, all contents are guaranteed, and remind student to miss which evaluation content.
After step 5, student often complete group member's evaluation, PHP code check is used whether to complete the evaluation of all members once, if all group member's comprehensive evaluation completes, then increase the link that group's relative evaluation is carried out in display, the View Filter utilizing Drupal to provide equally and can table function be edited, realize the relative evaluation of all group members, the mode selected by individual event is the evaluation that group member provides-3 to 3.Use the relative evaluation of PHP code check all members when preserving and whether be 0, if be not 0, then provide prompting with The Scarlet Letter, and provide with.Also prompting is provided for the situation being all 0 point to all members of group, after checking, has provided the button of relative evaluation, after student has clicked submit button, noted down this student and complete relative evaluation, facilitate teacher to check.
Step 6, after student completes relative evaluation, after being examined by PHP code check, increase group assessment link, student clicks and carries out the group assessment, click the group assessment first, by whether having had this student of this project group assessment content in PHP code check database, if do not had, PHP code is then utilized to provide the interface function of Drupal to create a group assessment record, and by the table the edited module that Druapl provides, the new group assessment created is modified, student is also by individual event system of selection to the group assessment, can 0 to 3 be selected, default value is 0, click after submitting to and preserve group assessment result, wherein some fields in the group assessment, such as point to project structure field, point to group structure field, the information that sensing evaluation personnel texture field all originally logs in student by PHP Code obtaining sets value, the student being only needs input group assessment mark.
Step 7, teacher log in the companion of companion's evaluation system to all groups and evaluate submission situation and check before project evaluation end cycle.First check that group submits situation to, the view provided by Drupal and filtering function, show all companion's evaluation content, and whether filtering items field points to Evaluation: Current project, filter and point to whether little group field is that current check group filters, only show all companion's evaluation content of appointment group current project, and pass through all relative evaluation contents of current group in PHP symbol lookup database, check whether each group member completes relative evaluation and submit to, whether relative evaluation result is 0, if there is exception, then shown by overstriking red font, teacher is facilitated to remind specific group member to complete companion's evaluation as early as possible.For the group completing submission, according to the score of each member in the algorithm calculating group set, and by result by web displaying out, whether last companion's evaluation result is reasonable to facilitate teacher to check.
After group's relative evaluation checks, teacher reexamines in companion's appraisal report of all group members submission whether comprise responsive words and phrases in " providing the good place that group member does " field and " providing group member's area for improvement " field.The view display provided by Drupal and filtering function, show these 2 field contents in all user report, whether filtering items field points to Evaluation: Current project, filter and point to whether little group field is that current check group filters, only show appointment group current project and own " providing the good place that group member does " field and " providing group member's area for improvement " field contents, and utilize and can edit table module and realize revising susceptibility words and preserving.
After teacher completes all inspections, current project is set to appraisal report issue, and send out mail notification companion appraisal report to all members by the mailing system of Drupal to issue, be next project by Evaluation: Current item setup, or directly close Evaluation: Current item setup, avoid student to modify again to the project issuing report.
Step 8, student log in companion's evaluation system again, and PHP code can check whether this student has the project issued, and if any, then increase display and connect.Student clicks this connection, can check the parameter connecting input, determines the bullets that inputs and is issued state, and avoid student's illegal modifications to connect, display does not have companion's appraisal report of project of issue.Whether this report shows the relative evaluation mark oneself submitted to each group member, and other member is to the relative evaluation score average of this member, accurate for the relative evaluation comparing oneself.Show oneself to the evaluation of group and other member the draw to the group assessment divide, whether accurate to the group assessment for comparing oneself.And the integrate score of this project oneself is calculated according to all relative evaluation marks, score depends on three aspects, is first others' evaluation to oneself, is the accuracy evaluated oneself in addition, and to the accuracy that other member of group evaluates.In addition, companion's appraisal report also comprises group member to the praise of oneself and suggestion, praises and suggestion random display, realizes anonymous effect.The PDF view utilizing Drupal to provide, companion's appraisal report can be shown as PDF, displaying contents is consistent with webpage format, is conveniently saved in this locality or is dealt into oneself mailbox.
Above-mentioned performing step makes full use of Drupal functional realiey of increasing income, and other dynamic web page technique also can realize, and uses the database of other type also can reach same effect.Therefore, the invention is not restricted to embodiment here, those skilled in the art, according to announcement of the present invention, do not depart from improvement that category of the present invention makes and amendment all should within protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. for realizing the device that companion evaluates, it is characterized in that, comprising database module, user management module, assessment item administration module, synchronous evaluation module, report check module and report and checking module;
Described database module is each model calling with other respectively, for preserving user profile, project information and evaluation result information;
Described user management module is connected with database module, for realizing user's registration and user management;
Described assessment item administration module checks model calling with database module, report check module, synchronous evaluation module and report respectively, completes evaluation for setting different projects for student by companion's evaluation module;
Described companion's evaluation module checks model calling with database module, report check module, assessment item administration module and report respectively, for being supplied to the interface that user carries out evaluating;
Described report check module connects with database module, assessment item administration module and synchronous evaluation module respectively, for completing the inspection to user's evaluation result, and issues report;
Described report check module respectively with database module, synchronous evaluation module, assessment item administration module and connection, for checking the appraisal report of specific project for user.
2. according to claim 1 a kind of for realizing the device that companion evaluates, it is characterized in that, described user profile comprises school, class and group.
3. according to claim 1 and 2 a kind of for realizing the device that companion evaluates, it is characterized in that, described user management comprises: to student, teacher and keeper's granted rights; Class creates, and distributes student and teacher the class to correspondence; Create the group under class, distribute student to corresponding group.
4. according to claim 1 a kind of for realizing the device that companion evaluates, it is characterized in that, described evaluation comprises member's comprehensive evaluation, member's relative evaluation and the group assessment.
5. a kind of device for realizing companion's evaluation according to claim 4, it is characterized in that, described companion's evaluation module, when user completes member's comprehensive evaluation, checks all items of comprehensive evaluation, guarantees all items all for empty; If there is project to be empty, then warned and required user's correction; If be not all empty, then preserve this member's comprehensive evaluation.
6. according to claim 5 a kind of for realizing the device that companion evaluates, it is characterized in that, described member's comprehensive evaluation comprise this member whether actively, careful preparation whether fully, panel discussion whether fully, the group that whether actively the completes task of distributing and provide suggestion, whether listen attentively to others' suggestion and actively correct, good place that this member does and provide this member's area for improvement.
7. according to claim 4 a kind of for realizing the device that companion evaluates, it is characterized in that, described companion's evaluation module, when user completes member's relative evaluation, checks whether the score sum of all members is 0, if not 0, then warned and required user's correction; If 0, then preserve this member's relative evaluation.
8. according to claim 1 and 2 a kind of for realizing the device that companion evaluates, it is characterized in that, the inspection of described report check module to user's evaluation result is specially: check in the report submitting to the progress of appraisal report and inspection to submit to and whether use sensitive word or band insult words.
9. a kind of device for realizing companion's evaluation according to claim 1 and 2, is characterized in that, described report checks that module checks appraisal report by two kinds of modes for user: webpage mode and the PDF way of output.
10., based on an a kind of application for realizing the device that companion evaluates according to claim 1, it is characterized in that, comprise the following steps:
(1) build companion and evaluate server, office terminal creates class in user management module, and teachers and students' user account corresponding for this class is imported database module;
(2) teacher side logs in companion and evaluates server, creates group, and student is assigned in different groups;
(3) teacher side creates companion's assessment item from assessment item administration module, and sets current student assessment project and current teacher's inspection item;
(4) student side logs in companion and evaluates server, enters companion's evaluation module, checks group member, clicks different group members, completes the member's comprehensive evaluation to all group members, shows member's relative evaluation button after completing;
(5) student side clicks member's relative evaluation button carry out member's relative evaluation, all member's relative evaluations of guarantee group and be allow to submit to after 0;
(6), after student side completes group member's relative evaluation, click group assessment button, group is evaluated and submits to;
(7) teacher side logs in companion and evaluates server, and from report check module check, each group companion evaluates performance, and checks in comprehensive evaluation whether comprise responsive words and phrases, after teacher checks amendment, the report of this assessment item is issued;
(8) student logs in companion and evaluates server, checks that module checks companion's appraisal report of this project oneself from report.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510063727.9A CN104680450A (en) | 2015-02-06 | 2015-02-06 | Peer assessment device and application thereof |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510063727.9A CN104680450A (en) | 2015-02-06 | 2015-02-06 | Peer assessment device and application thereof |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN104680450A true CN104680450A (en) | 2015-06-03 |
Family
ID=53315451
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510063727.9A Pending CN104680450A (en) | 2015-02-06 | 2015-02-06 | Peer assessment device and application thereof |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN104680450A (en) |
Cited By (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105894879A (en) * | 2016-06-30 | 2016-08-24 | 苏州科大讯飞教育科技有限公司 | Auxiliary teaching system and method |
| CN106327924A (en) * | 2015-06-24 | 2017-01-11 | 福建天晴数码有限公司 | Intelligent classroom realization method and system |
| CN107146006A (en) * | 2017-04-25 | 2017-09-08 | 北京文华在线教育科技股份有限公司 | Online course user job mutually comments intelligent distribution, evaluation method and system |
| CN107153919A (en) * | 2017-05-09 | 2017-09-12 | 常熟理工学院 | A kind of online anonymous assessment method |
| CN107481172A (en) * | 2017-08-31 | 2017-12-15 | 山东财经大学 | Interactive job management method and system based on wechat public platform |
| CN110147964A (en) * | 2019-05-24 | 2019-08-20 | 焦作大学 | Talent evaluation system based on big data technology |
| CN112559873A (en) * | 2020-12-21 | 2021-03-26 | 周欢 | User recommendation system based on intelligent education |
| CN113610679A (en) * | 2021-08-06 | 2021-11-05 | 四川牛阶科技有限责任公司 | Online learning method and system based on supervision constraint |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20120310696A1 (en) * | 2008-07-09 | 2012-12-06 | Learning Sciences International | Performance observation, tracking and improvement system and method |
| CN103337008A (en) * | 2013-06-09 | 2013-10-02 | 青岛农业大学 | Comprehensive assessment system for undergraduates in colleges and universities |
| US20140344271A1 (en) * | 2011-09-29 | 2014-11-20 | Shl Group Ltd | Requirements characterisation |
-
2015
- 2015-02-06 CN CN201510063727.9A patent/CN104680450A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20120310696A1 (en) * | 2008-07-09 | 2012-12-06 | Learning Sciences International | Performance observation, tracking and improvement system and method |
| US20140344271A1 (en) * | 2011-09-29 | 2014-11-20 | Shl Group Ltd | Requirements characterisation |
| CN103337008A (en) * | 2013-06-09 | 2013-10-02 | 青岛农业大学 | Comprehensive assessment system for undergraduates in colleges and universities |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| 刘洋 等: ""基于同伴评价的研究型课程考核方法研究"", 《计算机教育》 * |
| 王彦群: ""网络学习的发展性评价系统的研究与设计"", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库 社会科学II辑》 * |
Cited By (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106327924A (en) * | 2015-06-24 | 2017-01-11 | 福建天晴数码有限公司 | Intelligent classroom realization method and system |
| CN105894879A (en) * | 2016-06-30 | 2016-08-24 | 苏州科大讯飞教育科技有限公司 | Auxiliary teaching system and method |
| CN107146006A (en) * | 2017-04-25 | 2017-09-08 | 北京文华在线教育科技股份有限公司 | Online course user job mutually comments intelligent distribution, evaluation method and system |
| CN107153919A (en) * | 2017-05-09 | 2017-09-12 | 常熟理工学院 | A kind of online anonymous assessment method |
| CN107481172A (en) * | 2017-08-31 | 2017-12-15 | 山东财经大学 | Interactive job management method and system based on wechat public platform |
| CN110147964A (en) * | 2019-05-24 | 2019-08-20 | 焦作大学 | Talent evaluation system based on big data technology |
| CN112559873A (en) * | 2020-12-21 | 2021-03-26 | 周欢 | User recommendation system based on intelligent education |
| CN112559873B (en) * | 2020-12-21 | 2021-08-13 | 融易学控股(深圳)有限公司 | User recommendation system based on intelligent education |
| CN113610679A (en) * | 2021-08-06 | 2021-11-05 | 四川牛阶科技有限责任公司 | Online learning method and system based on supervision constraint |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN104680450A (en) | Peer assessment device and application thereof | |
| Ahmad | Evaluating student satisfaction of quality at international branch campuses | |
| Sommer et al. | Psychosocial factors predicting academic performance of students at a historically disadvantaged university | |
| Pollard et al. | A comparison of interprofessional perceptions and working relationships among health and social care students: the results of a 3‐year intervention | |
| CN102750139B (en) | A kind of online course editing system and a kind of method for creating online course | |
| Parsazadeh et al. | The construction and validation of a usability evaluation survey for mobile learning environments | |
| CN106373055A (en) | Teaching quality assessment system based on big data | |
| Kim et al. | Differences in demotivation between Chinese and Korean English teachers: A mixed-methods study | |
| Mundy et al. | Teachers’ perceived values on the effect of literacy strategy professional development | |
| McCaughtry et al. | Urban health educators' perspectives and practices regarding school nutrition education policies | |
| Story et al. | Innovative strategies for nursing education program evaluation | |
| Fergusson et al. | Astrobiology outreach and the nature of science: the role of creativity | |
| Shang | Application of machine learning and internet of things techniques in evaluation of English teaching effect in colleges | |
| CN107730410A (en) | A kind of design and realization of Students' evaluation system | |
| Liu et al. | Assessing awareness of college student startup entrepreneurs toward mass entrepreneurship and innovation from the perspective of educational psychology | |
| Whaley et al. | Evaluating cohort and intervention effects on black adolescents’ ethnic–racial identity: A cognitive–cultural approach | |
| Kirkpatrick et al. | Efficacy of an international exchange via the Internet | |
| Xue et al. | Construction and application of the student satisfaction evaluation system for the extracurricular education services in colleges | |
| Alsulami et al. | The Impact of Campus Culture on the Satisfaction Level of Engineering Students: A Metaheuristics Approach | |
| Avery et al. | Seeking empirical validity in an assurance of learning system | |
| Tang et al. | [Retracted] College Classroom English Teaching Methods and Practice Based on Big Data Technology | |
| CN104461475A (en) | Course editing system for online teaching and course creating method for online teaching | |
| Li | Deep Learning‐Based Correlation Analysis between the Evaluation Score of English Teaching Quality and the Knowledge Points | |
| Li et al. | Personal training evaluation system design for high education | |
| CN108269022B (en) | ERP skill automatic evaluation method and device supporting multi-strategy operation |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20150603 |