CN104616548B - Assessment on teaching effect system for educational training - Google Patents
Assessment on teaching effect system for educational training Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN104616548B CN104616548B CN201510075209.9A CN201510075209A CN104616548B CN 104616548 B CN104616548 B CN 104616548B CN 201510075209 A CN201510075209 A CN 201510075209A CN 104616548 B CN104616548 B CN 104616548B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- teaching
- score
- testing
- auditory
- visual
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 20
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 115
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 56
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 35
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 33
- 238000013102 re-test Methods 0.000 claims description 34
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000013101 initial test Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000009012 visual motion Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006993 memory improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Educational Technology (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Electrically Operated Instructional Devices (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention relates to a kind of Assessment on teaching effect system for educational training, including：Auditory attention test module, for testing lifting situation of the auditory attention of each student before and after training and calculating the first teaching score；Auditory memory power test module, for testing lifting situation of the auditory memory power of each student before and after training and calculating the second teaching score；Visual resolution factor test module, learns point for testing lifting situation of the visual resolution factor of each student before and after training and calculating the three religions；Apparent motion integration aptitude tests module, for testing lifting situation of the apparent motion integration ability of each student before and after training and calculating the 4th teaching score；Test evaluation module, for generating the test report of each student according to every test result, and calculates the teaching evaluation score with class teacher according to every score, to evaluate to the teaching efficiency with class teacher according to the height of teaching evaluation score.The system is conducive to carrying out comprehensive examination and assessment to teaching efficiency.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of education and training informatization, in particular to a teaching effect evaluation system for education and training.
Background
In the prior art, a teaching effect evaluation system specially suitable for training education is lacked, and more teaching effects of teachers are evaluated by means of subjective impressions of managers and students.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a teaching effect evaluation system for educational training, which is beneficial to comprehensive examination and evaluation of teaching effects.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention adopts the technical scheme that: a teaching outcome evaluation system for educational training, comprising:
the auditory attention testing module is used for testing the promotion condition of the auditory attention of each student after training compared with that before training, calculating a first teaching score according to the promotion condition, and then sending the testing result of the auditory attention and the first teaching score to the testing and evaluating module;
the auditory memory testing module is used for testing the auditory memory of each student after training and compared with the lifting condition before training, calculating a second teaching score according to the auditory memory, and then sending the auditory memory testing result and the second teaching score to the testing and evaluating module;
the visual resolution testing module is used for testing the improvement condition of the visual resolution of each trainee after training compared with that before training, calculating a third teaching score according to the improvement condition, and then sending the test result of the visual resolution and the third teaching score to the testing and evaluating module;
the visual and kinetic integration capability testing module is used for testing the promotion condition of the visual and kinetic integration capability of each student after training compared with that before training, calculating a fourth teaching score according to the promotion condition, and then sending the test result of the visual and kinetic integration capability and the fourth teaching score to the testing and evaluating module;
and the test evaluation module is used for generating test reports of the students according to the test results of the auditory attention, the auditory memory, the visual resolution and the visual motion integration capability, calculating teaching evaluation scores of teachers according to the first teaching score, the second teaching score, the third teaching score and the fourth teaching score, and evaluating the teaching effect of teachers according to the height of the teaching evaluation scores.
Further, the auditory attention test module measures the test result of the auditory attention according to the ability age; the auditory attention testing module performs retesting on the trained auditory attention, and calculates the promoted ability age X1 according to the following formula:
x1= Min ((student actual age + K1), retest result) -preliminary test result before training
Min ((actual student age + K1), retest) represents the smaller of the sum of the actual student age and K1 and the retest, and K1 represents the set maximum increase value of auditory attention;
the calculation method of the first teaching score is as follows:
if a1< = X1< a2, the first teaching score is counted in n11 points; if a2< = X1< a3, the first teaching score is counted in n12 points; if X1> = a3, the first teaching score meter n13 points; wherein, a1, a2 and a3 are set age thresholds with different abilities of auditory attention, and n11, n12 and n13 are set values with different first teaching scores.
Further, the auditory memory testing module measures the testing result of the auditory memory according to the ability age; the auditory memory testing module retests the trained auditory memory and calculates the improved ability age X2 according to the following formula:
x2= Min ((student actual age + K2), retest result) -preliminary test result before training
Min ((actual age of trainee + K2), retest) represents the smaller of the sum of the actual age of trainee and K2 and the retest, and K2 represents the set maximum increase value of auditory memory;
the second teaching score is calculated by:
if b1< = X2< b2, the second teaching score is counted in n21 points; if b2< = X2< b3, the second teaching score is counted in n22 points; if X2> = b3, the second teaching score meter n23 points; wherein b1, b2 and b3 are set age thresholds with different abilities of auditory memory, and n21, n22 and n23 are set values with different second teaching scores.
Further, the visual resolution test module measures the test result of the visual resolution in percentage; the visual resolution testing module performs retesting on the trained visual resolution to obtain a retesting result X3, and the third teaching score is calculated by the following method:
if c1< X3< = c2, the third teaching score is n31 points; if c2< X3< = c3, the third teaching score is n32 points; where c1, c2, c3 are different percentage thresholds of the set visual resolution, and n31, n32 are different values of the set third teaching score.
Further, the visual and kinetic integration capability testing module measures the testing result of the visual and kinetic integration capability according to the capability age; the visual and kinetic integration capability testing module performs retest on the trained visual and kinetic integration capability, and calculates the promoted capability age X4 according to the following formula:
x4= Min ((student actual age + K3), retest result) -preliminary test result before training
Min ((actual age of trainee + K3), retest result) represents the smaller value of the sum of the actual age of trainee and K3 and retest result, and K3 represents the set maximum improvement value of the visual and kinetic integration ability;
the fourth teaching score is calculated by:
if d1< = X4< d2, the fourth teaching score is counted in n41 points; if d2< = X4< d3, the fourth teaching score is counted in n42 points; if X4> = d3, the fourth teaching score meter n43 points; wherein d1, d2 and d3 are different ability age thresholds of the set visual integration ability, and n41, n42 and n43 are different values of the set fourth teaching score.
Further, the method for calculating the teaching evaluation score with the teacher comprises the following steps:
teaching evaluation score =
Wherein,X ij the jth teaching score representing the ith student,nthe total number of the trainees is represented,mindicating the benchmark score value that each trainee should achieve.
The teaching effect evaluation system for the educational training has the advantages that the system respectively performs initial test and retest on each ability of a student before and after training to obtain the improvement condition of each ability of the student, and calculates the teaching evaluation score of a teacher with a class according to the improvement condition, so that the comprehensive examination and evaluation of the teaching effect are realized, the evaluation result is objective and accurate, and the teaching effect evaluation system has strong practicability and wide application prospect.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a schematic system structure according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The invention is described in further detail below with reference to the figures and the embodiments.
The invention relates to a teaching effect evaluation system for educational training, which comprises: the device comprises an auditory attention testing module 1, an auditory memory testing module 2, a visual resolution testing module 3, a visual and dynamic integration capability testing module 4 and a testing and evaluating module 5.
The auditory attention testing module 1 is used for testing the promotion condition of the auditory attention of each student after training compared with the condition before training, calculating a first teaching score according to the promotion condition, and then sending the testing result of the auditory attention and the first teaching score to the testing and evaluating module 5. In this embodiment, the auditory attention test module 1 measures the test result of auditory attention by the ability age; the auditory attention testing module performs retesting on the trained auditory attention, and calculates the promoted ability age X1 according to the following formula:
x1= Min ((student actual age + K1), retest result) -preliminary test result before training
Min ((trainee actual age + K1), retest) represents the smaller of the sum of trainee actual age and K1 and retest, and K1 represents the set maximum increase value of auditory attention.
The calculation method of the first teaching score is as follows:
if a1< = X1< a2, the first teaching score is counted in n11 points; if a2< = X1< a3, the first teaching score is counted in n12 points; if X1> = a3, the first teaching score meter n13 points; wherein, a1, a2 and a3 are set age thresholds with different abilities of auditory attention, and n11, n12 and n13 are set values with different first teaching scores.
One specific embodiment is: if 1< = X1<2, the first teaching score is counted for 0.5 points; if 2< = X1<3, the first teaching score is scored 1; if X1> =3, the first teaching score is 1.5 points.
And the auditory memory testing module 2 is used for testing the auditory memory of each student after training compared with the improvement condition before training, calculating a second teaching score according to the auditory memory improvement condition, and then sending the auditory memory testing result and the second teaching score to the testing and evaluating module 5. In this embodiment, the auditory memory test module 2 measures the test result of auditory memory by age of ability; the auditory memory testing module retests the trained auditory memory and calculates the improved ability age X2 according to the following formula:
x2= Min ((student actual age + K2), retest result) -preliminary test result before training
Min ((actual student age + K2), retest) represents the smaller of the sum of the actual student age and K2 and the retest, and K2 represents the set maximum increase in auditory memory.
The second teaching score is calculated by:
if b1< = X2< b2, the second teaching score is counted in n21 points; if b2< = X2< b3, the second teaching score is counted in n22 points; if X2> = b3, the second teaching score meter n23 points; wherein b1, b2 and b3 are set age thresholds with different abilities of auditory memory, and n21, n22 and n23 are set values with different second teaching scores.
One specific embodiment is: if 1< = X2<2, then the second teaching score is scored 0.5; if 2< = X2<3, the second teaching score is scored 1; if X2> =3, the second teaching score is scored 1.5 points.
And the visual resolution testing module 3 is used for testing the improvement condition of the visual resolution of each trainee after training compared with that before training, calculating a third teaching score according to the improvement condition, and then sending the test result of the visual resolution and the third teaching score to the testing and evaluating module 5. In this embodiment, the visual resolution testing module 3 measures the test result of the visual resolution in percentage; the visual resolution testing module performs retesting on the trained visual resolution to obtain a retesting result X3, and the third teaching score is calculated by the following method:
if c1< X3< = c2, the third teaching score is n31 points; if c2< X3< = c3, the third teaching score is n32 points; where c1, c2, c3 are different percentage thresholds of the set visual resolution, and n31, n32 are different values of the set third teaching score.
One specific embodiment is: if 8% < X3< =50%, then the third teaching score is 0.5 points; if 0% < X3< =8%, the third teaching score is 1 point.
And the visual and kinetic integration capability testing module 4 is used for testing the promotion condition of the visual and kinetic integration capability of each student after training compared with that before training, calculating a fourth teaching score according to the promotion condition, and then sending the test result of the visual and kinetic integration capability and the fourth teaching score to the testing and evaluating module 5. In this embodiment, the visual and kinetic integration capability testing module 4 measures the test result of the visual and kinetic integration capability by the capability age; the visual and kinetic integration capability testing module performs retest on the trained visual and kinetic integration capability, and calculates the promoted capability age X4 according to the following formula:
x4= Min ((student actual age + K3), retest result) -preliminary test result before training
Min ((actual age of trainee + K3), retest result) represents the smaller value of the sum of the actual age of trainee and K3 and retest result, and K3 represents the set maximum improvement value of the visual and kinetic integration ability;
the fourth teaching score is calculated by:
if d1< = X4< d2, the fourth teaching score is counted in n41 points; if d2< = X4< d3, the fourth teaching score is counted in n42 points; if X4> = d3, the fourth teaching score meter n43 points; wherein d1, d2 and d3 are different ability age thresholds of the set visual integration ability, and n41, n42 and n43 are different values of the set fourth teaching score.
One specific embodiment is: if 0.5< = X4<1, then the fourth teaching score is scored 0.5; if 1< = X4<2, the fourth teaching score is scored 1; if X4> =2, the fourth teaching score is scored 1.5.
And the test evaluation module 5 is used for generating test reports of the students according to the test results of the auditory attention, the auditory memory, the visual resolution and the visual motion integration capability, and calculating teaching evaluation scores of teachers according to the first teaching score, the second teaching score, the third teaching score and the fourth teaching score so as to evaluate the teaching effect of teachers according to the height of the teaching evaluation scores. In this embodiment, the method for calculating the teaching evaluation score with the teacher includes:
teaching evaluation score =
Wherein,X ij the jth teaching score representing the ith student,nthe total number of the trainees is represented,mindicating the benchmark score value that each trainee should achieve.
In order to improve the accuracy of the evaluation result, in the preferred embodiment of the invention, the teaching effect of the teacher is evaluated by taking the average value of the teaching evaluation scores in the latest continuous interval time (such as the latest continuous months).
The above are preferred embodiments of the present invention, and all changes made according to the technical scheme of the present invention that produce functional effects do not exceed the scope of the technical scheme of the present invention belong to the protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (5)
1. A teaching effect evaluation system for educational training, comprising:
the auditory attention testing module is used for testing the promotion condition of the auditory attention of each student after training compared with that before training, calculating a first teaching score according to the promotion condition, and then sending the testing result of the auditory attention and the first teaching score to the testing and evaluating module;
the auditory memory testing module is used for testing the auditory memory of each student after training and compared with the lifting condition before training, calculating a second teaching score according to the auditory memory, and then sending the auditory memory testing result and the second teaching score to the testing and evaluating module;
the visual resolution testing module is used for testing the improvement condition of the visual resolution of each trainee after training compared with that before training, calculating a third teaching score according to the improvement condition, and then sending the test result of the visual resolution and the third teaching score to the testing and evaluating module;
the visual and kinetic integration capability testing module is used for testing the promotion condition of the visual and kinetic integration capability of each student after training compared with that before training, calculating a fourth teaching score according to the promotion condition, and then sending the test result of the visual and kinetic integration capability and the fourth teaching score to the testing and evaluating module;
the test evaluation module is used for generating test reports of the students according to the test results of the auditory attention, the auditory memory, the visual resolution and the visual motion integration capability, calculating teaching evaluation scores of teachers according to the first teaching score, the second teaching score, the third teaching score and the fourth teaching score, and evaluating the teaching effect of teachers according to the height of the teaching evaluation scores;
the visual resolution testing module measures the testing result of the visual resolution in percentage; the visual resolution testing module performs retesting on the trained visual resolution to obtain a retesting result X3, and the third teaching score is calculated by the following method:
if c1< X3< ═ c2, the third teaching score is given by n31 points; if c2< X3< ═ c3, the third teaching score is given by n32 points; where c1, c2, c3 are different percentage thresholds of the set visual resolution, and n31, n32 are different values of the set third teaching score.
2. The pedagogical evaluation system for educational training of claim 1, wherein the auditory attention test module measures the test result of auditory attention by the ability age; the auditory attention testing module performs retesting on the trained auditory attention, and calculates the promoted ability age X1 according to the following formula:
x1 Min ((actual age of student + K1), retest) — initial test results before training
Min ((trainee actual age + K1), retest) represents the smaller of the sum of trainee actual age and K1 and retest, and K1 represents the set maximum increase value of auditory attention;
the calculation method of the first teaching score is as follows:
if a1< ═ X1< a2, the first teaching score is scored n 11; if a2< ═ X1< a3, the first teaching score is scored n 12; if X1> -a 3, the first teaching score meter n13 points; wherein, a1, a2 and a3 are set age thresholds with different abilities of auditory attention, and n11, n12 and n13 are set values with different first teaching scores.
3. The pedagogical effect evaluation system for educational training of claim 1, wherein the auditory memory test module measures the test result of auditory memory by ability age; the auditory memory testing module retests the trained auditory memory and calculates the improved ability age X2 according to the following formula:
x2 Min ((actual age of student + K2), retest) — initial test results before training
Min ((trainee actual age + K2), retest) represents the smaller of the sum of trainee actual age and K2 and retest, and K2 represents the set maximum increase value of auditory memory;
the second teaching score is calculated by:
if b1< ═ X2< b2, the second teaching score is scored by n 21; if b2< ═ X2< b3, the second teaching score is scored by n 22; if X2> -b 3, the second teaching score meter n23 points; wherein b1, b2 and b3 are set age thresholds with different abilities of auditory memory, and n21, n22 and n23 are set values with different second teaching scores.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein the visual-motor integration ability test module measures the test result of the visual-motor integration ability by age of ability; the visual and kinetic integration capability testing module performs retest on the trained visual and kinetic integration capability, and calculates the promoted capability age X4 according to the following formula:
x4 Min ((actual age of student + K3), retest) — initial test results before training
Min ((trainee actual age + K3), retest) represents the smaller value of the sum of trainee actual age and K3 and retest, and K3 represents the set maximum improvement value of the visual and kinetic integration ability;
the fourth teaching score is calculated by:
if d1< ═ X4< d2, the fourth teaching score is scored n 41; if d2< ═ X4< d3, the fourth teaching score is scored n 42; if X4> -d 3, the fourth teaching score meter n43 points; wherein d1, d2 and d3 are different ability age thresholds of the set visual integration ability, and n41, n42 and n43 are different values of the set fourth teaching score.
5. The teaching effect evaluation system for educational training according to claim 1, wherein the teaching evaluation score with teacher is calculated by:
wherein, XijThe j teaching score of the ith student is shown, n is the total number of students, and m is the benchmark score value which each student is qualified to reach.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510075209.9A CN104616548B (en) | 2015-02-13 | 2015-02-13 | Assessment on teaching effect system for educational training |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510075209.9A CN104616548B (en) | 2015-02-13 | 2015-02-13 | Assessment on teaching effect system for educational training |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN104616548A CN104616548A (en) | 2015-05-13 |
| CN104616548B true CN104616548B (en) | 2017-03-15 |
Family
ID=53150979
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510075209.9A Active CN104616548B (en) | 2015-02-13 | 2015-02-13 | Assessment on teaching effect system for educational training |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN104616548B (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109961208A (en) * | 2017-12-26 | 2019-07-02 | 深圳市智游人科技有限公司 | Data processing method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
Family Cites Families (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2003131549A (en) * | 2001-10-24 | 2003-05-09 | Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> | Device for assisting design of learning course, program for the same and recording medium with the program recorded thereon |
| CN202601003U (en) * | 2011-12-12 | 2012-12-12 | 苏州市职业大学 | Test device for teaching quality evaluation in university |
-
2015
- 2015-02-13 CN CN201510075209.9A patent/CN104616548B/en active Active
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN104616548A (en) | 2015-05-13 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Brown et al. | Accuracy in the scoring of writing: Studies of reliability and validity using a New Zealand writing assessment system | |
| CN107705033A (en) | A kind of quality of instruction evaluation system based on big data | |
| CN106203811A (en) | A kind of Evaluation Method of Teaching Quality | |
| CN105654402A (en) | Learning ability determining method and learning ability determining system based on time dimension and homogeneous comparison dimension | |
| Ismail et al. | Malaysian students' misconceptions about measures of central tendency: An error analysis | |
| CN104616548B (en) | Assessment on teaching effect system for educational training | |
| CN105336235A (en) | Score setting method used for intelligent learning system | |
| TWI494894B (en) | Simulation of the university admissions method and system thereof | |
| CN108549997A (en) | A kind of mathematics classroom teaching effect evaluation system | |
| Huang et al. | An empirical analysis of student satisfaction in practical teaching––research based on structural equation model | |
| Valdez | Assessing mathematics classroom instruction: Observation of learning environments (OLE) | |
| Lohgheswary et al. | Evaluating the reliability of pre-test differential equations questions using Rasch measurement model | |
| Osman et al. | Measurement of students' understanding in final examination of Statics and Dynamics Course using Rasch Measurement Model | |
| CN111178673A (en) | Comprehensive evaluation system for examination training quality | |
| Kelcey et al. | Measurement of Classroom Teaching Quality with Item Response Theory. | |
| Abarghoie et al. | Development and standardization of achievement test | |
| Dong et al. | An Investigation and Analysis on the Improvement of Primary School Students’ Learning Accomplishment by Attending Innovation Course, Based on the SOLO Taxonomy and Analytic Hierarchy Process | |
| Kerckhoff | Value stance in family life education | |
| Liu et al. | Large-scale implementation of computerized adaptive testing with cognitive diagnosis in China | |
| NAKORN | Usability of fair and compatible ONET across years: Social studies, religion and culture subject case | |
| CN113283694A (en) | Power distribution network operation assessment method and system | |
| Sha et al. | A comparison of two augmented subscore methods and the role of score distribution | |
| Chen et al. | An Experimental Study on the Influence of Swimming Curriculum Reform on Students' Physical Fitness Test Indicators-Taking Guangdong University of Foreign Studies as an Example | |
| Qiao | Application of SPSS in the Analysis of Comprehensive Results of Specially Selected Public Physical Education Classes--Take the example of" Taekwondo" Special Selection Class | |
| Wahyuni et al. | The Appropriateness of the Instrument in Assessing Children’s Early Mathematical Abilities |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| C41 | Transfer of patent application or patent right or utility model | ||
| TA01 | Transfer of patent application right |
Effective date of registration: 20160615 Address after: Hongshan Zhen Yang Qiao Road, Gulou District of Fuzhou city of Fujian Province in 350002 155, Huajing building four layer 401 Applicant after: Fujian Keduote Education Investment Co. Ltd. Address before: The new Fuzhou Jinan District of Fujian province in 350012 after the pond No. 73 Applicant before: FUZHOU ZHONGKE XUNGE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. |
|
| C14 | Grant of patent or utility model | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| CP01 | Change in the name or title of a patent holder | ||
| CP01 | Change in the name or title of a patent holder |
Address after: 350002 Fourth Floor 401 Huajing Building, 155 Yangqiao West Road, Hongshan Town, Gulou District, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province Patentee after: Fujian Zhongkodot Health Technology Co., Ltd. Address before: 350002 Fourth Floor 401 Huajing Building, 155 Yangqiao West Road, Hongshan Town, Gulou District, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province Patentee before: Fujian Keduote Education Investment Co. Ltd. |