CN104573395B - Big data platform safety assessment quantitative analysis method - Google Patents

Big data platform safety assessment quantitative analysis method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN104573395B
CN104573395B CN201510044502.9A CN201510044502A CN104573395B CN 104573395 B CN104573395 B CN 104573395B CN 201510044502 A CN201510044502 A CN 201510044502A CN 104573395 B CN104573395 B CN 104573395B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
safety
component
degree
domain
platform
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201510044502.9A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN104573395A (en
Inventor
李战克
丁富强
罗京卫
裴国才
周敏杰
何红林
丁梦娟
丁香
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shanghai Ideal Information Industry Group Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Shanghai Ideal Information Industry Group Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shanghai Ideal Information Industry Group Co Ltd filed Critical Shanghai Ideal Information Industry Group Co Ltd
Priority to CN201510044502.9A priority Critical patent/CN104573395B/en
Publication of CN104573395A publication Critical patent/CN104573395A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN104573395B publication Critical patent/CN104573395B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention belongs to the technical field of big data platform safety monitoring and assessment and provides a big data platform safety assessment quantitative analysis method. the method includes establishing component tables in a computer database; reading all component information from the component tables; processing each component and factors, affecting the platform safety, of the component circularly; acquiring all domain identifiers and component safety affecting factors; processing the domain identifiers and component safety affecting factors circularly; acquiring all index service entries and domain safety affecting factors corresponding to the safety domain, and computing each index safety degree, domain safety degree, component safety affecting degree and component safety degree of the domain; computing the platform safety affecting degree of the components according to the platform safety affecting factors of each component; completing the processing of all the components; computing the safety degree of the platform according to the platform safety affecting degree of each component. The method has the advantages that the requirements on safety management in big data environment can be met, and the scalability and flexibility of programs are improved.

Description

Big data platform safety assesses quantitative analysis method
Technical field
The invention belongs to big data platform safety monitoring and evaluation technical field, more particularly to a kind of big data platform safety is commented Assessment analysis method.
Background technology
In big data platform safety monitoring and evaluation field, the final goal of monitoring is to provide for safe big data business Service, the scope of safety monitoring generally covers the physical environment of big data platform, basic network, system hardware and software, platform group Part, business datum, service application, data acquisition, data storage, Distributed Calculation, user's access, inside and outside interface, safety are examined The many levels such as meter, and safety index is typically discrete and isolated, it is difficult to find an effective method can intuitively, very Reflect the whether normal synthesis to big data platform safety of the monitoring index for being distributed in big data platform every aspect on the spot Power of influence, this combined influence power finally determines the security evaluation tolerance of big data platform.
The security implication degree of each component that big data platform safety assessment tolerance is included depending on the platform, component Degree of safety depends on the degree of safety of each security domain that the component is included, and the degree of safety of security domain is wrapped depending on security domain again The degree of safety of each safety index service entry for containing.For same security domain and safety index service entry, to different components Disturbance degree is different, such as store crossing the border for security service item in data safety, the HDFS components to providing storage service For disturbance degree it is very big, and to provide computing resource service YARN components for disturbance degree very little.Equally, same component is come Say, be also different to the security implication of big data platform, for example, store class HDFS component, it is to based on computing in a distributed manner Big data platform safety disturbance degree with regard to very little, and to provide data storage based on big data platform disturbance degree it is just very big.
Currently without the safety monitoring appraisal procedure of any big data platform, there is great potential safety hazard.
Therefore, big data platform safety monitoring and evaluation technical field is badly in need of a kind of being applied under big data environment to bursting tube The needs of reason, improve the big data platform safety assessment quantitative analysis method of application's expansibility and motility.
The content of the invention
The invention provides big data platform safety assesses quantitative analysis method, technical scheme is as follows:
Big data platform safety assesses quantitative analysis method, comprises the steps:
Step one, traffic table, including platform assembly table, security domain table, component and domain are set in the data base of computer Relation table, domain distribution safety index collection service entry table;
Step 2, from the component table of the step one all component information is read, mainly include component id information, component The security implication factor information of name information and component to platform;
Step 3, process is circulated to the factor of influence of platform safety to each component and component;
Step 4, all domain identifiers and component safety factor of influence are obtained from component and domain relation table according to component ID;
Step 5, process is circulated to every group of domain identifier and component safety factor of influence;
Step 6, according to safe domain identifier from achievement data collection service entry table in obtain all index service entrys and domain peace Full factor of influence, calculates the degree of safety of each index in domain, the single index degree of safety=1- domains security implication factor;
Step 7, the degree of safety for calculating individual domain, the degree of safety of individual domain is that the domain corresponds to all index degrees of safety most Little value;
Step 8, the component safety disturbance degree that domain is calculated according to the component safety factor of influence in each domain, individual domain Component safety disturbance degree=(The degree of safety of 1- individual domains)× component safety factor of influence;
The component safety factor of influence group in all domains and domain is disposed, then into step 9, otherwise repeat step Five;
Step 9, the degree of safety of computation module, the maximum of the component safety disturbance degree in component safety degree=all domains of 1-;
Step 10, the platform safety disturbance degree that component is calculated according to the platform safety factor of influence of each component, it is single Component platform security implication degree=(The degree of safety of 1- single components)× platform safety factor of influence;
All component is disposed, then into step 11, otherwise repeat step 3;
Step 11, the degree of safety that platform is calculated according to the platform safety disturbance degree of each component, platform safety degree=1- The maximum of the platform safety disturbance degree of all component.
Preferably, in the assessment quantitative analysis method of big data platform safety, the platform assembly table in step one is used for fixed Various pieces in justice composition big data platform, such as data acquisition, data storage HDFS, distribution are calculated, calculated in real time and big number According to application;Security domain table is used to define each security-related classification, such as data safety, transmission safety, network security, system Safety, application safety;Component and security domain relation table are used to define the relation between big data component and security domain, i.e. big data The security measure of component is calculated by the degree of safety of one or more security domains;Domain distribution safety index collection service entry table For being finely divided monitoring to security domain, such as include data encryption, sensitive information desensitization, the data safety of backup and recovery Domain.
Beneficial effects of the present invention:
Because the present invention is by order reading platform module information, obtained from component and security domain relation table according to component ID All domain identifiers and component safety factor of influence, according to domain identifier all index services are obtained from safety index service entry list And domain security implication factor list, calculate the degree of safety of each index service entry in domain, single index service entry degree of safety= 1- domains degree of safety factor of influence, individual domain degree of safety=MIN(The degree of safety of index service entry 1, the degree of safety ... of index service entry 2., Index service entry n degree of safety), the component safety disturbance degree in domain is calculated further according to the component safety factor of influence in each domain, it is single The component safety disturbance degree in individual domain=(The degree of safety of 1- individual domains)× component safety factor of influence, then calculates each component Degree of safety, each component safety degree=1-max(The component safety disturbance degree of domain 1, the component safety disturbance degree ... of domain 2, domain n component peaces Umbra loudness), further according to the platform safety factor of influence of each component the platform disturbance degree of component, the platform of unimodule are calculated Security implication degree=(The degree of safety of 1- single components)× platform safety factor of influence, finally calculates the degree of safety of big data platform, Platform safety degree=1-max(The security implication degree of component 1, the security implication degree ... of component 2, component n component safety disturbance degrees), because This, the present invention is suitable for the needs under big data environment to safety management, and convenient and safe manager is flexible by the method for configuring Big data platform and platform assembly are realized, platform is set up in the configuration of the corresponding relation between security domain and safety index service entry The correlation model of analysis on Security Degree of Retaining between each level, greatly increases extensibility and the motility of program.
Description of the drawings
With reference to the accompanying drawings and detailed description describing the present invention in detail:
Fig. 1 is the flow chart that a kind of big data platform safety of the invention assesses quantitative analysis method.
Specific embodiment
In order that measure, creation characteristic, reached purpose and effect that the technology of the present invention is realized are easy to understand, tie below Conjunction is specifically illustrating, and the present invention is expanded on further.
Fig. 1 is the flow chart that a kind of big data platform safety of the invention assesses quantitative analysis method.
As shown in figure 1, the invention provides a kind of assessment quantitative analysis method of big data platform safety, walks including following Suddenly:
Step one, traffic table, including platform assembly table, security domain table, component and domain are set in the data base of computer Relation table, domain distribution safety index collection service entry table;
Platform assembly table be used for define composition big data platform in various pieces, such as data acquisition, data storage HDFS, Distribution is calculated, calculated in real time and big data application;Security domain table is used to define each security-related classification, such as data peace Entirely, safety, network security, system safety, application safety are transmitted;Component and security domain relation table be used to defining big data component and Relation between security domain, the i.e. security measure of big data component is calculated by the degree of safety of one or more security domains; Distribution safety index collection service entry table in domain is used to be finely divided security domain monitoring, such as includes that data encryption, sensitive information take off The data safety domain project of quick, backup and recovery etc.;
Step 2, from the traffic table all component information is read, mainly include component id information, component Name information And component is to security implication factor of platform etc.;
Step 3, process is circulated to the factor of influence of platform safety to each component and component;
Step 4, all domain identifiers and the domain security implication factor are obtained from component and domain relation table according to component ID;
Step 5, process is circulated to every group of domain identifier and component safety factor of influence;
Step 6, the safety for obtaining all index service entrys from achievement data collection service entry table according to safe domain identifier Factor of influence, calculates the degree of safety of each index in domain, the single index degree of safety=1- domains security implication factor;
Step 7, the degree of safety for calculating individual domain, the degree of safety of individual domain is that the domain corresponds to all index degrees of safety most Little value;
Step 8, the component safety disturbance degree that domain is calculated according to the component safety factor of influence in each domain, individual domain Component safety disturbance degree=(The degree of safety of 1- individual domains)× component safety factor of influence;
The component safety factor of influence group in all domains and domain is disposed, then into step 9, otherwise repeat step Five;
Step 9, the degree of safety of computation module, the maximum of the component safety disturbance degree in component safety degree=all domains of 1-;
Step 10, the platform safety disturbance degree that component is calculated according to the platform safety factor of influence of each component, it is single Component platform security implication degree=(The degree of safety of 1- single components)× platform safety factor of influence;
All component is disposed, then into step 11, otherwise repeat step 3;
Step 11, the degree of safety that platform is calculated according to the platform safety disturbance degree of each component, platform safety degree=1- The maximum of the platform safety disturbance degree of all component.
Below using the safety monitoring of telecommunications big data platform as embodiment specifically introducing the enforcement stream of the inventive method Journey:
The degree of safety of telecommunications big data platform depends on the peace of HDFS, YARN, HBASE these three components that platform is included Umbra loudness, and the degree of safety of component depends on safe domain system safety, network security, data safety;The safety of system safety Disturbance degree depends on system password complexity, cipher change strategy, Viral diagnosis, system vulnerability detection;Network security is depended on Intrusion detection, Network Isolation, fire wall;Data safety depends on data encryption, data desensitization, data backup.
The state of each safety index that hypothesis is collected is as shown in Table 1:
Table one
(1)HDFS:
The state of password complexity, cipher change strategy and Viral diagnosis in system safety is normal, therefore this three Degree of safety=1-0%=100%, the state of system vulnerability monitoring is abnormal, its degree of safety=1-50%=50%;For system security domain Degree of safety=min { 100%, 100%, 100%, 50% }=50%, system security domain to the security implication degree of component=(1-50%)× 50%=25%;
The state of intrusion detection and Network Isolation in network security is normal, therefore this two degree of safety=1-0%= 100%, the state of fire wall is abnormal, its degree of safety=1-40%=60%;For network security domain degree of safety=min 100%, 100%, 60% }=60%, network security domain to the security implication degree of component=(1-60%)×50%=20%;
The state of data encryption is abnormal, its degree of safety=1-80%=20%, data desensitization and data backup in data safety State is normal, both degree of safety=1-0%=100, for data safety domain degree of safety=min { 20%, 100%, 100% }= 20%, network security domain to the security implication degree of component=(1-20%)×80%=64%;
Degree of safety=the 1-max of HDFS components(25%, 20%, 64%)=1-64%=36%;
The platform safety disturbance degree of HDFS components=(1-36%)×80%=51.2%.
(2)YARN:
The state of password complexity, Viral diagnosis and system vulnerability in system safety is normal, therefore this three peace Whole step=1-0%=100%, the state of cipher change strategy is abnormal, its degree of safety=1-30%=70%;For the peace of system security domain Whole step=min { 100%, 70%, 100%, 100% }=70%, system security domain to the security implication degree of component=(1-70%)×50%= 35%;
The state of intrusion detection and fire wall in network security is normal, therefore this two degree of safety=1-0%=100%, The state of Network Isolation is abnormal, its degree of safety=1-50%=50%;For network security domain degree of safety=min 100%, 100%, 50% }=50%, network security domain to the security implication degree of component=(1-50%)×50%=25%;
The state of data encryption is abnormal, its degree of safety=1-80%=20%, data desensitization and data backup in data safety State is normal, both degree of safety=1-0%=100%, for data safety domain degree of safety=min { 20%, 100%, 100% }= 20%, network security domain to the security implication degree of component=(1-20%)×50%=40%;
Degree of safety=the 1-max of YARN components(35%, 25%, 40%)=1-40%=60%;
The platform safety disturbance degree of YARN components=(1-60%)*60%=24%.
(3)HBASE:
The state of password complexity, cipher change strategy and system vulnerability in system safety is normal, therefore this three Degree of safety=1-0%=100%, the state of Viral diagnosis is abnormal, its degree of safety=1-50%=50%;For the peace of system security domain Whole step=min { 100%, 100%, 50%, 100% }=50%, system security domain to the security implication degree of component=(1-50%)×60%= 30%。
The state of intrusion detection and Network Isolation in network security is normal, therefore this two degree of safety=1-0%= 100%, the state of fire wall is abnormal, its degree of safety=1-50%=50%;For network security domain degree of safety=min 100%, 100%, 50% }=50%, network security domain to the security implication degree of component=(1-50%)×50%=25%;
The state of data encryption is abnormal, its degree of safety=1-40%=60%, data desensitization and data backup in data safety State is normal, both degree of safety=1-0%=100%, for data safety domain degree of safety=min { 60%, 100%, 100% }= 60%, network security domain to the security implication degree of component=(1-60%)*50%=20%;
Degree of safety=the 1-max of HBASE components(30%, 25%, 20%)=1-30%=70%;
The platform safety disturbance degree of HBASE components=(1-70%)×60%=18%;
Therefore, the degree of safety=1-max of big data platform(51.2%,24%,18%)=1-51.2%=48.8%.
Because the present invention is by order reading platform module information, obtained from component and security domain relation table according to component ID All domain identifiers and component safety factor of influence, according to domain identifier all index services are obtained from safety index service entry list And domain security implication factor list, calculate the degree of safety of each index service entry in domain, single index service entry degree of safety= The 1- domains security implication factor, individual domain degree of safety=MIN(The degree of safety of index service entry 1, the degree of safety ... of index service entry 2., refer to Mark service entry n degree of safety), the component influences degree in domain is calculated further according to the component safety factor of influence in each domain, individual domain Component safety disturbance degree=(The degree of safety of 1- individual domains)× component safety factor of influence, then calculates the degree of safety of each component, Each component safety degree=1-max(The component safety disturbance degree of domain 1, the component safety disturbance degree ... of domain 2, domain n component safeties affect Degree), further according to the platform safety factor of influence of each component the platform disturbance degree of component, the platform safety shadow of unimodule are calculated Loudness=(The degree of safety of 1- single components)× platform safety factor of influence, finally calculates the degree of safety of big data platform, platform peace Whole step=1-max(The security implication degree of component 1, the security implication degree ... of component 2, component n component safety disturbance degrees).
The present invention is suitable for the needs under big data environment to safety management, method of the convenient and safe manager by configuring Big data platform and platform assembly are flexibly realized, the configuration of the corresponding relation between security domain and safety index service entry is set up The correlation model of analysis on Security Degree of Retaining between each level of platform, greatly increases extensibility and the motility of program.
Ultimate principle, principal character and the advantages of the present invention of the present invention has been shown and described above.The technology of the industry Personnel it should be appreciated that the present invention is not restricted to the described embodiments, the simply explanation described in above-described embodiment and description this The principle of invention, of the invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention also to have various changes and modifications, these changes Change and improvement is both fallen within scope of the claimed invention.The claimed scope of the invention by appending claims and its Equivalent is defined.

Claims (2)

1. big data platform safety assessment quantitative analysis method, it is characterised in that comprise the steps:
Step one, traffic table, including platform assembly table, security domain table, component and domain relation are set in the data base of computer Table, domain distribution safety index collection service entry table;
Step 2, from the traffic table of the step one all component information is read, mainly include component id information, component Name The security implication factor information of information and component to platform;
Step 3, process is circulated to the factor of influence of platform safety to each component and component;
Step 4, all domain identifiers and component safety factor of influence are obtained from component and domain relation table according to component ID;
Step 5, process is circulated to every group of domain identifier and component safety factor of influence;
Step 6, according to safe domain identifier from achievement data collection service entry table in obtain the safe shadow of all index service entrys and domain The factor is rung, the degree of safety of each index in domain, the single index degree of safety=1- domains security implication factor is calculated;
Step 7, the degree of safety for calculating individual domain, the degree of safety of individual domain is the minima of all index degrees of safety of domain correspondence;
Step 8, the component safety disturbance degree that domain is calculated according to the component safety factor of influence in each domain, the component of individual domain Security implication degree=(degree of safety of 1- individual domains) × component safety factor of influence;
The component safety factor of influence group in all domains and domain is disposed, then into step 9, otherwise repeat the step Five;
Step 9, the degree of safety of computation module, the maximum of the component safety disturbance degree in component safety degree=all domains of 1-;
Step 10, the platform safety disturbance degree that component is calculated according to the platform safety factor of influence of each component, single component Platform safety disturbance degree=(degree of safety of 1- single components) × platform safety factor of influence;
All component is disposed, then into step 11, otherwise repeat the step 3;
Step 11, the degree of safety that platform is calculated according to the platform safety disturbance degree of each component, platform safety degree=1- institutes There is the maximum of the platform safety disturbance degree of component.
2. big data platform safety according to claim 1 assesses quantitative analysis method, it is characterised in that the platform group Part table is used to defining the various pieces in composition big data platform, including data acquisition, data storage HDFS, distribution calculate, it is real When calculate and big data application;Security domain table is used to define each security-related classification, including data safety, transmission peace Entirely, network security, system safety, application safety;Component and security domain relation table be used to defining big data component and security domain it Between relation, i.e. the security measure of big data component is calculated by the degree of safety of one or more security domains;Domain distribution peace Full index collection service entry table is used to be finely divided security domain monitoring, including data encryption, sensitive information desensitization, data backup With the data safety domain recovered.
CN201510044502.9A 2015-01-29 2015-01-29 Big data platform safety assessment quantitative analysis method Active CN104573395B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201510044502.9A CN104573395B (en) 2015-01-29 2015-01-29 Big data platform safety assessment quantitative analysis method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201510044502.9A CN104573395B (en) 2015-01-29 2015-01-29 Big data platform safety assessment quantitative analysis method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN104573395A CN104573395A (en) 2015-04-29
CN104573395B true CN104573395B (en) 2017-04-12

Family

ID=53089441

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201510044502.9A Active CN104573395B (en) 2015-01-29 2015-01-29 Big data platform safety assessment quantitative analysis method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN104573395B (en)

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105046081B (en) * 2015-07-21 2018-03-16 深圳市永兴元科技股份有限公司 The sampling check method and device in fire-fighting place
CN105069734A (en) * 2015-08-11 2015-11-18 广东建邦计算机软件有限公司 Method and system for analyzing security risk by using big data
CN105516189B (en) * 2016-01-08 2018-06-15 四川大学 Network security enforcement system and method based on big data platform
CN106096227A (en) * 2016-05-30 2016-11-09 重庆大学 Revolving dial hydraulic system safety in operation quantitative evaluating method
CN108763916B (en) * 2018-06-05 2022-05-13 创新先进技术有限公司 Service interface security assessment method and device
CN109753805A (en) * 2018-12-28 2019-05-14 北京东方国信科技股份有限公司 A kind of method of big data safety coefficient evaluation and test
CN111490990B (en) * 2020-04-10 2021-02-23 上海星地通讯工程研究所 Network security analysis method based on big data platform, big data platform server and computer readable storage medium

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1556611A (en) * 2003-12-30 2004-12-22 上海交通大学 Network message safety comprehensive management method based on safety application servicer
CN101286838A (en) * 2007-04-11 2008-10-15 电子科技大学 Design of large-scale dynamic multicasting security system framework
CN104239802A (en) * 2014-10-15 2014-12-24 浪潮电子信息产业股份有限公司 Trusted server design method based on cloud data center

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9331990B2 (en) * 2003-12-22 2016-05-03 Assa Abloy Ab Trusted and unsupervised digital certificate generation using a security token
US7965702B2 (en) * 2005-12-30 2011-06-21 Intel Corporation Reliable reporting of location data
US9495560B2 (en) * 2013-04-29 2016-11-15 Sri International Polymorphic virtual appliance rule set

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1556611A (en) * 2003-12-30 2004-12-22 上海交通大学 Network message safety comprehensive management method based on safety application servicer
CN101286838A (en) * 2007-04-11 2008-10-15 电子科技大学 Design of large-scale dynamic multicasting security system framework
CN104239802A (en) * 2014-10-15 2014-12-24 浪潮电子信息产业股份有限公司 Trusted server design method based on cloud data center

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Information Security At Cyber Space And Integral Component Of Cyber Law With Respect To Domain Security;Sachin Patil,Kalpana Salunkhe.;《International Journal of ICT and Management》;20130228;第I卷;第22-25页 *
网络安全组件协同操作研究;杨宏宇,等.;《计算机应用》;20090930;第29卷(第9期);第2315-2318页 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN104573395A (en) 2015-04-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN104573395B (en) Big data platform safety assessment quantitative analysis method
US20240154983A1 (en) Network anomaly detection and profiling
Bretas et al. Smart grids cyber-physical security as a malicious data attack: An innovation approach
US20170149830A1 (en) Apparatus and method for automatically generating detection rule
CN106790190A (en) A kind of Vulnerability Management system and method
CN104680076A (en) System for anonymizing and aggregating protected health information
CN105556526A (en) Hierarchical threat intelligence
Magklaras et al. A review of information security aspects of the emerging COVID-19 contact tracing mobile phone applications
Riadi et al. Log analysis techniques using clustering in network forensics
CN105825130B (en) A kind of information security method for early warning and device
Li et al. An approach to model network exploitations using exploitation graphs
CN109359484A (en) Processing method, device, equipment and the medium of the security audit terminal log of cloud platform
Eyeleko et al. A critical overview of industrial internet of things security and privacy issues using a layer-based hacking scenario
CN109495424B (en) Method and device for detecting intrusion flow
Lu et al. Combining smart construction objects–enabled blockchain oracles and signature techniques to ensure information authentication and integrity in construction
Li et al. A hierarchical mobile‐agent‐based security operation center
Motlhabi et al. Context-aware cyber threat intelligence exchange platform
Kim A Study on the Attack Index Packet Filtering Algorithm Based on Web Vulnerability
Kai et al. Development of qualification of security status suitable for cloud computing system
Kumar et al. Outlier detection based fault-detection algorithm for cloud computing
Jain Decentralize log file storage and integrity preservation using blockchain
CN105430008A (en) Computing pool application method, computing pool application system, cloud management platform, server and authentication platform
Livshitz et al. The actual problems of IT-security process assurance
WO2019123449A1 (en) A system and method for analyzing network traffic
CN111932751B (en) Intelligent park Internet of things comprehensive management platform and management method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant