CN104359772B - The normal stress threshold value determination method of rock mass discontinuity peak value angle of friction - Google Patents

The normal stress threshold value determination method of rock mass discontinuity peak value angle of friction Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN104359772B
CN104359772B CN201410527303.9A CN201410527303A CN104359772B CN 104359772 B CN104359772 B CN 104359772B CN 201410527303 A CN201410527303 A CN 201410527303A CN 104359772 B CN104359772 B CN 104359772B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
friction
structural plane
peak value
normal stress
structural
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201410527303.9A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN104359772A (en
Inventor
杜时贵
罗战友
黄曼
吕原君
张晓莺
雍睿
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
University of Shaoxing
Original Assignee
University of Shaoxing
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by University of Shaoxing filed Critical University of Shaoxing
Priority to CN201410527303.9A priority Critical patent/CN104359772B/en
Publication of CN104359772A publication Critical patent/CN104359772A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN104359772B publication Critical patent/CN104359772B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)

Abstract

The normal stress threshold value determination method of a kind of rock mass discontinuity peak value angle of friction, comprises the following steps: 1) rating test direction;2) Selection experiment structural plane and sample quantities;3) roughness value of each structural plane is measured4) the peak value angle of friction φ of structural plane under every grade of normal stress is obtained by direct shear test1i、φ2i, each structural fece sample is carried out the direct shear test under the conditions of different normal stress;5) the relative error magnitudes δ of engineering rock structural face is determined;6) normal stress threshold value σ of each structural plane peak value angle of friction is determinedi;7) the final normal direction stress threshold of this group structural plane peak value angle of friction is determined: when this group m structural plane peak value angle of friction normal stress threshold value σiExtreme difference less than meansigma methods 15% time, take normal stress threshold value σ of m structural plane peak value angle of frictioniMeansigma methodsNormal stress threshold value as this group structural plane peak value angle of friction.The principle of the invention is clear and definite, easy to operate, low cost, using effect are good, it is simple to carry out engineer applied.

Description

The normal stress threshold value determination method of rock mass discontinuity peak value angle of friction
Technical field
The invention belongs to field of engineering technology, the normal direction relating to rock mass discontinuity peak value angle of friction should Power threshold value determination method, it is adaptable to water conservancy, traffic, mining, geology, nuclear waste disposal, The correlation engineering such as oil have the normal stress of the rock mass discontinuity peak value angle of friction of stress effect Threshold value determination method.
Background technology
Before the present invention makes, the most still there is no the normal stress threshold of rock mass discontinuity angle of friction The determination method of value.Rock mass discontinuity peak value angle of friction is engineering rock structural face Stability Assessment Important parameter.Joint straight shear test under the conditions of different normal stresses shows, structural plane peak value Angle of friction presents nonlinear attenuation with the increase of normal stress, as shown in Figure 1.
Being shown by the result of the test of Fig. 1, when normal stress is less, peak value angle of friction is bigger; When normal stress is bigger, peak value angle of friction diminishes;When normal stress increases to certain value, peak Value angle of friction substantially tends towards stability value, at this moment disclosure satisfy that Practical Project rock mass discontinuity peak value The minimum normal stress that angle of friction relative error requires is referred to as normal stress threshold value, peak value angle of friction The stress effect of rock mass discontinuity angle of friction it is referred to as with the effect of normal stress change.Due to engineering The normal stress of rock mass is the biggest, therefore, needs employing to tend towards stability in actual rock mass engineering project Structural plane peak value angle of friction.But the normal direction used due to direct shear test under normal test conditions Stress loading is limited in scope, especially for large-scale structure face, due to the Normal stress applied Excessive, the conventional loading equipemtn of laboratory is difficult to meet loading normal stress requirement, therefore can not obtain The normal stress threshold value required to engineering rock structural face peak value angle of friction ultimate value, and multistage High normal stress direct shear test is expensive, the cycle is long, it is difficult to meet engine request.Therefore, as What determines that structural plane peak value angle of friction normal stress threshold value is urgently to solve in engineering quickly and easily Key issue certainly.
Summary of the invention
In order to solve prior art cannot determine the normal stress of rock mass discontinuity peak value angle of friction The deficiency of threshold value, the present invention provides a kind of definite principle, easy to operate, low cost, use effect The best, it is simple to carry out the normal stress threshold value of the rock mass discontinuity peak value angle of friction of engineer applied Determine method.
In order to solve the technical scheme that above-mentioned technical problem is proposed:
A kind of normal stress threshold value determination method of rock mass discontinuity peak value angle of friction, described really The method of determining comprises the following steps:
1) rating test direction: rating test direction on selected engineering rock structural face;
2) Selection experiment structural plane and sample quantities: according to the scale of engineering rock structural face, Selected one group of structural plane size not changed with dimensional effect, and the structural plane of selected size is entered Row sampling processing;This group structural fece sample number be m, m be the natural number not less than 3;
3) the roughness value JRC of i-th structural plane in this group m structural plane is measuredi。 I-th structural plane is rule according to certain intervals, and measures the roughness of every scribing position Coefficient;Then the roughness value to surveys line all on this structural plane is averaged and is obtained this structure Face JRCi
4) by the peak of i-th structural plane under the conditions of the direct shear test acquisition low normal stress of two-stage Value angle of friction φ1i、φ2i.I-th structural fece sample in this group is carried out two-stage low normal stress bar Direct shear test under part, normal stress is taken as σ respectively1i=0.25MPa, σ2i=0.5MPa, can obtain Obtain the structural plane peak shear strength τ under the conditions of the low normal stress of two-stage1iAnd τ2i, then according to public affairs FormulaObtain this structural plane structural plane peak value under the conditions of the low normal stress of two-stage Angle of friction φ 1 i = arctan ( τ 1 i σ 1 i ) , φ 2 i = arctan ( τ 2 i σ 2 i ) ;
5) the relative error magnitudes δ of engineering rock structural face peak value angle of friction is determined;
6) normal stress threshold value σ of i-th structural plane peak value angle of friction is determinedi;Should by normal direction The rate of change formula of powerObtain the normal stress threshold value of i-th structural plane peak value angle of friction σi≥2.3·JRCi/(g2iδ), wherein: g ni = φ ni - φ ni - 1 σ ni - σ ni - 1 , g 2 i = φ 2 i - φ 1 i σ 2 i - σ 1 i , N in subscript is N-th grade of normal stress, i is the i-th structural plane in this group m structural plane, and 2 is the second level Normal stress;gniFor the structural plane peak value friction under n-th grade of normal stress of the i-th structural plane The rate of change at angle, g2iRub for i-th structural plane structural plane peak value under the 2nd grade of normal stress Wipe the rate of change at angle;
7) the average normal direction stress threshold of this group structural plane peak value angle of friction is determinedWhen this group M structural plane peak value angle of friction normal stress threshold value σiExtreme difference less than meansigma methods 15% time, institute State the difference that extreme difference is maximum and minima, take the normal stress of m structural plane peak value angle of friction Threshold value σiMeansigma methodsNormal stress threshold value as this group structural plane peak value angle of friction.
Further, described step 7) in, when the normal stress of m structural plane peak value angle of friction Threshold value extreme difference σiDuring more than meansigma methods 15%, the structural fece sample being stepped up same size is carried out Direct shear test, until wherein there being extreme difference the putting down less than m selected sample of m sample All normal stress threshold value 15% time, take selected m sample peak value angle of friction normal stress threshold The meansigma methods of value is as the final normal direction stress threshold of this group structural plane peak value angle of friction.
The present invention compared with prior art, has the advantage that and is mainly reflected in: rock mass structure The normal stress threshold value determination method of face peak value angle of friction have definite principle, simple to operate, Low cost, using effect are good, have bigger implementary value and economic results in society.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is the stress effect threshold figure of structural plane peak value angle of friction.
Detailed description of the invention
The present invention will be further described below.
With reference to Fig. 1, the determination side of the normal stress threshold value of a kind of rock mass discontinuity peak value angle of friction Method, comprises the following steps:
1) rating test direction: rating test direction on selected engineering rock structural face;
2) Selection experiment structural plane and sample quantities: according to the scale of engineering rock structural face, Selected one group with the structural plane size of dimensional effect change, (usual scope does not exists Between 300mm × 300mm-1000mm × 1000mm), and the structural plane of selected size is carried out Sampling processing;This group structural fece sample number be m, m be the natural number not less than 3;
3) the roughness value JRC of the i-th structural plane of m structural plane in this group is measuredi.? Rule according to certain intervals on i-th structural plane, and measure the roughness system of every scribing position Number;Then the roughness value to surveys line all on this structural plane is averaged and is obtained this structural plane JRCi
4) by the peak of i-th structural plane under the conditions of the direct shear test acquisition low normal stress of two-stage Value angle of friction φ1i、φ2i.I-th structural fece sample in this group is carried out two-stage low normal stress bar Direct shear test under part, normal stress is respectively σ1i=0.25MPa, σ2i=0.5MPa, can obtain Structural plane peak shear strength τ under the conditions of the low normal stress of two-stage1iAnd τ2i, then according to formulaObtain this structural plane structural plane peak value under the conditions of the low normal stress of two-stage to rub Wipe angle φ 1 i = arctan ( τ 1 i σ 1 i ) , φ 2 i = arctan ( τ 2 i σ 2 i ) ;
5) the relative error magnitudes δ of engineering rock structural face peak value angle of friction is determined;
6) normal stress threshold value σ of i-th structural plane peak value angle of friction is determinedi, should by normal direction The rate of change formula of powerObtain the normal stress threshold value of i-th structural plane peak value angle of friction σi≥2.3·JRCi/(g2iδ), wherein: g ni = φ ni - φ ni - 1 σ ni - σ ni - 1 , g 2 i = φ 2 i - φ 1 i σ 2 i - σ 1 i ,
7) the average normal direction stress threshold of this group structural plane peak value angle of friction is determinedWhen this group M structural plane peak value angle of friction normal stress threshold value σiExtreme difference less than meansigma methods 15% time, Described extreme difference is the difference of maximum and minima, and the normal direction taking m structural plane peak value angle of friction should Power threshold value σiMeansigma methodsNormal stress threshold value as this group structural plane peak value angle of friction.
Further, described step 7) in, when the normal stress of m structural plane peak value angle of friction Threshold value extreme difference σiDuring more than meansigma methods 15%, the structural fece sample being stepped up same size is carried out Direct shear test, until wherein there being extreme difference the putting down less than m selected sample of m sample All normal stress threshold value 15% time, take m selected structural fece sample peak value and rub horn cupping To the meansigma methods of stress threshold as the final normal stress threshold of this group structural plane peak value angle of friction Value.
In order to obtain executing a normal stress threshold value for slope project structural plane peak value angle of friction, use The normal stress threshold value determination method of rock mass discontinuity angle of friction.Meet engineering rock mass angle of friction Relative error be 10%.
The normal stress threshold value determination method of the rock mass discontinuity angle of friction of the present embodiment, its Determine that step is as follows:
1) rating test direction.Rating test direction on selected engineering rock structural face;
2) Selection experiment structural plane and sample quantities.According to the scale of engineering rock structural face, Selected one group of structural plane a size of 600mm not changed with dimensional effect, and to selected size Structural plane is sampled processing;This group structural fece sample quantity is 3.
3) the roughness value JRC of i-th structural plane is measuredi.Between i-th structural plane is carried out It is divided into the line of 100mm, and measures the roughness value of every scribing position;Then to this The roughness value of all surveys line of structural plane is averaged JRCi.Wherein, i=1,2,3.Such as table 1 Shown in.
The roughness value of each structural plane of table 1 is averaged JRCi
4) obtain the peak value of i-th structural plane under the low normal stress of two-stage by direct shear test to rub Wipe angle φ1i、φ2i.I-th structural plane is carried out direct shear test, and normal stress is taken as respectively σ1i=0.25MPa, σ2i=0.5MPa, can obtain the structural plane peak under the conditions of the low normal stress of two-stage Value shearing strength τ1iAnd τ2i, then according to formulaObtain this structural plane in two-stage Peak value angle of friction φ under the conditions of low normal stress1i, φ2i.Wherein, i=1,2,3.As shown in table 2.
Structural plane 1st structural plane 2nd structural plane 3rd structural plane
φ1i 51.16° 50.78° 49.68°
φ2i 46.25° 45.77° 45.20°
The peak value angle of friction φ of each structural plane of table 21i、φ2i
5) the relative error magnitudes δ of engineering rock structural face peak value angle of friction is determined.According to engineering Require as δ=10%.
6) normal stress threshold value σ of i-th structural plane peak value angle of friction is determinedi.By structural plane The rate of change formula of peak value angle of frictionObtain i-th structural fece sample peak value angle of friction Normal stress threshold value σi≥2.3·JRCi/(g2iδ), wherein: g ni = φ ni - φ ni - 1 σ ni - σ ni - 1 , g 2 i = φ 2 i - φ 1 i σ 2 i - σ 1 i . As Shown in table 3.
Structural plane 1st structural plane 2nd structural plane 3rd structural plane
g2i 19.65 18.85 17.93
σi(MPa) 11.01 10.63 10.40
The g of each structural plane of table 32iWith normal stress threshold value σi
7) the final normal direction stress threshold of this group structural plane peak value angle of friction is determinedThis group 3 Normal stress threshold value σ of individual structural fece sample peak value angle of frictioniExtreme difference is meansigma methods 5.7%, Less than the 15% of meansigma methods, therefore take the normal stress threshold value of all 3 structural plane peak value angle of frictions Meansigma methods 10.68MPa as final normal direction stress threshold.

Claims (2)

1. a normal stress threshold value determination method for rock mass discontinuity peak value angle of friction, its feature exists In: described determine that method comprises the following steps:
1) rating test direction: rating test direction on selected engineering rock structural face;
2) Selection experiment structural plane and sample quantities: according to the scale of engineering rock structural face, Selected one group of structural plane size not changed with dimensional effect, and the structural plane of selected size is entered Row sampling processing;This group structural fece sample number be m, m be the natural number not less than 3;
3) the roughness value JRC of i-th structural plane in this group m structural plane is measuredi, I-th structural plane is rule according to certain intervals, and measures the roughness of every scribing position Coefficient;Then the roughness value to surveys line all on this structural plane is averaged and is obtained this structure Face JRCi
4) by the peak of i-th structural plane under the conditions of the direct shear test acquisition low normal stress of two-stage Value angle of friction φ1i、φ2i, i-th structural fece sample in this group is carried out two-stage low normal stress bar Direct shear test under part, normal stress is taken as σ respectively1i=0.25MPa, σ2i=0.5MPa, can obtain Obtain the structural plane peak shear strength τ under the conditions of the low normal stress of two-stage1iAnd τ2i, then according to public affairs FormulaObtain this structural plane structural plane peak value under the conditions of the low normal stress of two-stage Angle of friction
5) the relative error magnitudes δ of engineering rock structural face peak value angle of friction is determined;
6) normal stress threshold value σ of i-th structural plane peak value angle of friction is determinedi;Should by normal direction The rate of change formula of powerObtain the normal stress threshold value of i-th structural plane peak value angle of friction σi≥2.3·JRCi/(g2iδ), wherein:N in subscript is N level normal stress, i is the i-th structural plane in this group m structural plane, and 2 is second level method To stress;gniFor i-th structural plane structural plane peak value angle of friction under n-th grade of normal stress Rate of change, g2iFor the structural plane peak value friction under the 2nd grade of normal stress of the i-th structural plane The rate of change at angle, δ represents the relative error magnitudes of rock mass discontinuity peak value angle of friction;
7) the average normal direction stress threshold of this group structural plane peak value angle of friction is determinedWhen this group m Individual structural plane peak value angle of friction normal stress threshold value σiExtreme difference less than meansigma methods 15% time, described Extreme difference is the difference of maximum and minima, takes the normal stress threshold of m structural plane peak value angle of friction Value σiMeansigma methodsNormal stress threshold value as this group structural plane peak value angle of friction.
2. the determination of the normal stress threshold value of rock mass discontinuity peak value angle of friction as claimed in claim 1 Method, it is characterised in that: described step 7) in, when the method for m structural plane peak value angle of friction To stress threshold σiDuring more than meansigma methods 15%, the structural fece sample being stepped up same size enters Row direct shear test, until wherein having the extreme difference of m sample less than m selected sample Average normal direction stress threshold 15% time, take selected m structural fece sample peak value angle of friction normal direction The meansigma methods of stress threshold is as the final normal direction stress threshold of this group structural plane peak value angle of friction.
CN201410527303.9A 2014-10-08 2014-10-08 The normal stress threshold value determination method of rock mass discontinuity peak value angle of friction Active CN104359772B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201410527303.9A CN104359772B (en) 2014-10-08 2014-10-08 The normal stress threshold value determination method of rock mass discontinuity peak value angle of friction

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201410527303.9A CN104359772B (en) 2014-10-08 2014-10-08 The normal stress threshold value determination method of rock mass discontinuity peak value angle of friction

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN104359772A CN104359772A (en) 2015-02-18
CN104359772B true CN104359772B (en) 2016-09-14

Family

ID=52527055

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201410527303.9A Active CN104359772B (en) 2014-10-08 2014-10-08 The normal stress threshold value determination method of rock mass discontinuity peak value angle of friction

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN104359772B (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104881564B (en) * 2015-03-09 2017-10-13 绍兴文理学院 The construction method of structural plane roughness coefficient dimensional effect probability density estimation
CN105606463B (en) * 2016-02-01 2018-05-22 绍兴文理学院 A kind of rock mass structural plane shearing strength integrated evaluating method based on middle intelligence function
CN109543326B (en) * 2018-11-30 2022-09-09 浙江大学 Method for determining normal stress of slope rock mass structural plane of surface mine in grading manner

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH1164202A (en) * 1997-08-21 1999-03-05 Fujita Corp Method and device for testing shear strength
CN1654954A (en) * 2005-01-12 2005-08-17 杜时贵 Method for taking values of mechanical and hydraulic properties of rock mass structural plane
CN2745027Y (en) * 2004-11-18 2005-12-07 金华职业技术学院 Roughness ruler
CN1253692C (en) * 2004-12-15 2006-04-26 金华职业技术学院 Method for determining dimensional size effects of toughness coefficients of typical stone structural surface
CN1815184A (en) * 2006-02-24 2006-08-09 浙江建设职业技术学院 Non-homogenous structural shear-strength sampling method
CN103926156A (en) * 2014-04-10 2014-07-16 内蒙古科技大学 Multi-fractal evaluation method for three-dimensional rock structure surface shear mechanical behavior

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH1164202A (en) * 1997-08-21 1999-03-05 Fujita Corp Method and device for testing shear strength
CN2745027Y (en) * 2004-11-18 2005-12-07 金华职业技术学院 Roughness ruler
CN1253692C (en) * 2004-12-15 2006-04-26 金华职业技术学院 Method for determining dimensional size effects of toughness coefficients of typical stone structural surface
CN1654954A (en) * 2005-01-12 2005-08-17 杜时贵 Method for taking values of mechanical and hydraulic properties of rock mass structural plane
CN1815184A (en) * 2006-02-24 2006-08-09 浙江建设职业技术学院 Non-homogenous structural shear-strength sampling method
CN100516825C (en) * 2006-02-24 2009-07-22 浙江建设职业技术学院 Non-homogenous structural shear-strength sampling method
CN103926156A (en) * 2014-04-10 2014-07-16 内蒙古科技大学 Multi-fractal evaluation method for three-dimensional rock structure surface shear mechanical behavior

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
JRC-JCS模型与直剪试验对比研究;杜时贵等;《岩石力学与工程学报》;20080630;第27卷(第增1期);第2747-2753页 *
JRC-JCS模型抗剪强度估算的平均斜率法;杜时贵等;《工程地质学报》;20051231;第13卷(第4期);第489-493页 *
Probabilistic Stability Evaluation of Oppstadhornet Rock Slope, Norway;H.S.B.Duzgun et.al;《Rock Mech Rock Eng》;20080705;第42卷(第5期);第729-749页 *
岩石结构面峰值摩擦角应力效应试验研究;罗战友等;《岩石力学与工程学报》;20140630;第33卷(第6期);第1142-1148页 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN104359772A (en) 2015-02-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN104237965B (en) Shale oil resource evaluating method and device
CN104359772B (en) The normal stress threshold value determination method of rock mass discontinuity peak value angle of friction
CN101976311B (en) Bayesian appraisal method of accelerated degradation test based on drift Brownian motion model
CN102426069B (en) Measurement method for rock mass crustal stress under extremely high stress condition
CN103410516A (en) Surrounding rock deformation early-warning construction method for small-diameter tunnel full-section excavation
CN103335910B (en) A kind of structural face shear strength size effect test unit Non-inferiority test method
CN105005695A (en) Wave scatter diagram chunking equivalent method for time domain fatigue analysis
CN105302946A (en) Method and apparatus for determining reliability of corrosive pipeline
CN104359771B (en) The fractal dimension of a kind of rock mass discontinuity peak value angle of friction determines method
CN105866631A (en) Novel double-end traveling wave fault location method based on fuzzy matching
CN105738480A (en) Concrete gravity dam strong shock damaged part quick identification method based on frequency errors
CN103760007B (en) A kind of predict the method for threshold in fatigue crack propagation under different stress ratio
CN103984845B (en) Method and system for calculating gas pipeline completeness evaluation period
CN102346809A (en) Method for converting blasting-vibration acceleration into velocity
CN102539234A (en) Judgment method using penetration method to detect strength slurry, stone and mortar
CN114216795B (en) Rapid identification method for rock mass structural failure mode
CN103678775A (en) Delivery pipe dynamic strength analysis method
Winkelmann The use of Response Surface Methodology for reliability estimation of aluminum silo subjected to wind load
CN104483197A (en) Method for obtaining accurate yield strength by treating abnormal tensile test curve of metal material
CN105205589A (en) Evaluation method of boiler efficiency of thermal generator set under different loads
CN105178345A (en) Side slope drainage system and construction method thereof
CN203719587U (en) A panel buckle checking tool
Jun-jie et al. Probabilistic analysis and reliability assessment for acceptance rate of foundation pile testing
CN101893419B (en) Method for measuring length of center line of chamfered cylinder
Yanqing et al. Improvement on recognition method of void beneath slab based on nondestructive testing technologies

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
CB03 Change of inventor or designer information

Inventor after: Du Shigui

Inventor after: Luo Zhanyou

Inventor after: Huang Man

Inventor after: Lv Yuanjun

Inventor after: Zhang Xiaoying

Inventor after: Yong Rui

Inventor before: Luo Zhanyou

Inventor before: Du Shigui

Inventor before: Huang Man

Inventor before: Lv Yuanjun

Inventor before: Zhang Xiaoying

Inventor before: Yong Rui

COR Change of bibliographic data
C14 Grant of patent or utility model
GR01 Patent grant
EE01 Entry into force of recordation of patent licensing contract

Application publication date: 20150218

Assignee: Sinosteel Maanshan Institute of Mining Research Co., Ltd.

Assignor: Shaoxing University

Contract record no.: 2018330000011

Denomination of invention: Method for determining normal stress threshold value of peak friction angles of rock mass structural planes

Granted publication date: 20160914

License type: Common License

Record date: 20180211

Application publication date: 20150218

Assignee: Zhejiang mountain and Sichuan Geological Environment Consulting Co., Ltd.

Assignor: Shaoxing University

Contract record no.: 2018330000010

Denomination of invention: Method for determining normal stress threshold value of peak friction angles of rock mass structural planes

Granted publication date: 20160914

License type: Common License

Record date: 20180211

Application publication date: 20150218

Assignee: China Nonferrous Metals Industry Kunming survey design and Research Institute Co Ltd

Assignor: Shaoxing University

Contract record no.: 2018330000012

Denomination of invention: Method for determining normal stress threshold value of peak friction angles of rock mass structural planes

Granted publication date: 20160914

License type: Common License

Record date: 20180211

Application publication date: 20150218

Assignee: Beijing mining and metallurgy science and Technology Group Co., Ltd.

Assignor: Shaoxing University

Contract record no.: 2018330000013

Denomination of invention: Method for determining normal stress threshold value of peak friction angles of rock mass structural planes

Granted publication date: 20160914

License type: Common License

Record date: 20180211

EE01 Entry into force of recordation of patent licensing contract