CN104330976B - Flight simulator rod force simulation fidelity evaluation device design method - Google Patents
Flight simulator rod force simulation fidelity evaluation device design method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN104330976B CN104330976B CN201310745161.9A CN201310745161A CN104330976B CN 104330976 B CN104330976 B CN 104330976B CN 201310745161 A CN201310745161 A CN 201310745161A CN 104330976 B CN104330976 B CN 104330976B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- unit
- model
- stick force
- model unit
- simulator
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a flight simulator rod force simulation fidelity evaluation device design method. A flight simulator rod force simulation fidelity evaluation device obtained through the design method of the invention can quantitatively evaluate simulation manipulation load system rod force simulation fidelity of a flight simulator according to a comprehensive evaluation index module used in the evaluation method of the simulator rod force simulation fidelity. Through data obtained by a test, correlation coefficient rxy=0.91 of evaluation result of the evaluation device obtained through the design method and aviator subjective evaluation result achieves very good consistency. Therefore, the method is reasonable and reliable. The model parameters of the design method are easy to modify. Therefore, the device obtained with the method can be applied to comprehensive evaluation of the steering wheel control force simulation fidelity of an automobile driving simulator, and can also applied to design of a steering wheel control force simulation fidelity comprehensive evaluation device of the automobile driving simulator.
Description
Technical field
The invention belongs to flight simulation field, it is related to flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus method for designing.
Background technology
Control load system is one of system on the important machine of aircraft, and what it determined aircraft utilization to a great extent can
Can property and flight safety.During state of flight change, the change of control load system stick force is more easy to by pilot than bar change in displacement
Experienced, therefore, stick force fidelity of simulation is one of key factor of impact flight simulator practicality, directly affects simulator
Training effect.
Due to the stick force fidelity of simulation of flight simulator affected by many factors so as to research and evaluate intricate,
So, also do not find out the good method of generally acknowledged objective quantitative stick force fidelity of simulation, the subjectivity of operator so far
Evaluate and occupy an important position always in the research of simulator stick force fidelity of simulation, and as inspection simulator stick force simulation
The ultimate criterion of fidelity.At present, from the domestic and foreign literature that sci-tech novelty-search retrieves, mainly study control load system
Stick force and its control design case of variation characteristic, the method without evaluating to stick force fidelity of simulation.In practical application, manipulate people
The subjective assessment of member occupies critical role in the stick force fidelity of simulation evaluation of simulator always, and with regard to simulator stick force mould
Intending fidelity method for objectively evaluating is exactly by testing to the performance indications amount of simulator control load system, is a kind of fixed
Amount objective appraisal.But, with simulator control load system difference, standard is different.Because subjective assessment is that simulator manipulates
Evaluation when personnel manipulate according to certain task, to the stick force that simulator control load system provides.At this moment evaluate and not only take
Certainly in simulator control load system itself, additionally depend on the behavioural characteristic of operator, the requirement to task etc.;And objective comment
Valency does not have the participation of operator again, and phenomenon main, that objective evaluation inconsistent so often occurs.It is true that simulator bar
Power fidelity of simulation is included in the interaction of people-simulator, and operator has risen quite important in simulator manipulation
Effect.
Content of the invention
Inconsistent in order to solve the problems, such as flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation master, objective evaluation, the invention provides
Flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus method for designing.
A kind of people-simulator that the present invention devises quantitative objective evaluation stick force fidelity of simulation controls closed loop model dress
Put, provide a kind of effective method for Simulation device control load system stick force fidelity of simulation.
The step of flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus method for designing of the present invention and condition are as follows:
Ith, the flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus of design;
IIth, the flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus based on design, set up a kind of flight simulator stick force
Fidelity of simulation evaluation method use comprehensive evaluation index model, storage in a computer, including:
1. consider that stick force follows the tracks of the error criterion of quality;2. consider stick force deflection error index;3. overall error index;
4. comprehensive evaluation index:
In formula,It is control load system pitching, inclination, three channel position steps of driftage respectively
Response rise time and its threshold value;
IIIth, determine the stick force data mated with simulator control load system, actual stick force data is by flight mould
Intend what the force snesor in the nominal stick force displacement unit of device stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus obtained;Tested manipulation is born
The input displacement of G system unit is the output of pilot guidance control strategy model unit;
IVth, determine the kinetic model of aircraft in flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus;
Vth, determine the manipulation control strategy model mating with simulator control load system;
VIth, choose more than four groups different simulated flight tasks, be simulated the input of device control load system stick force respectively
Output data, obtains the stick force displacement curve of actual load aircraft;
VIIth, input related data, a kind of evaluation method of the simulator stick force fidelity of simulation set up according to step II makes
Comprehensive evaluation index:
Obtain simulator control load system stick force fidelity of simulation result;
VIIIth, the flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus of present invention design and simulator stick force used are utilized
The evaluation result of the evaluation method of fidelity of simulation, with pilot's subjective assessment as two groups of sampled datas correlation coefficient rxy,
Come to evaluate the present invention design evaluating apparatus and simulator stick force fidelity of simulation used evaluation method reasonability and can
By property, described correlation coefficient rxyComputing formula is:
Wherein,
xi, yiIt is two groups of sampled datas respectively;
,It is the mean value of corresponding two groups of sampled datas respectively;
rxy=0 is completely uncorrelated;Work as rxyMore related closer to 1, two group of data;rxy=1 is perfectly correlated.
Beneficial effect:The invention provides flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus method for designing.This design
The flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus that method obtains, can be with quantitative assessment airborne simulation control load system
Stick force fidelity of simulation.By the data that 14 groups of tests are obtained, use correlation coefficient rxyComputing formula calculate, obtain this
The bright evaluation result of flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluation method and the correlation coefficient r of pilot's subjective assessmentxy=
0.91, and draw correlation curve.From the point of view of result of the test, the flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus of the present invention set
The device that meter method obtains is used for flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluation and the subjective assessment of pilot achieves quite
Good uniformity is it was demonstrated that the flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus method for designing of the present invention is reasonability and reliability
's.The model parameter of the method is easy to change.The device that therefore this method for designing obtains, is also applied to automobile driving simulator
The overall merit of steering wheel operating power fidelity of simulation.
Brief description
Fig. 1 is the schematic block of flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus that obtains of method for designing of the present invention
Figure.
Fig. 2 is certain type helicopter stick force displacement curve in the present invention.
Fig. 3 is the flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus being obtained using the method for designing of the present invention to certain type
Helicopter Simulator control load system carries out evaluation result and carries out subjective evaluation using pilot to control load system
Result correlation curve.
Fig. 4 is the model H with regard to linear acceleration for the vestibular model unit (11)vesThe schematic diagram of (s).
Fig. 5 is the schematic diagram with regard to the model of angular speed for the vestibular model unit (11).
Specific embodiment
Below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, as a example subordinate list and certain type Helicopter Simulator, the invention will be further described.
Embodiment 1 flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus method for designing, comprises the steps and condition:
Ith, flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus are designed;
As shown in figure 1, the flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus of design include:Manipulate control input unit
1st, tested control load system unit 2, computer 3, tester 4, simulated flight TU task unit 5, pilot guidance control strategy
Model unit 6, nominal stick force displacement curve unit 7, aircraft dynamics model unit 8, visual experience model unit 9, aircraft are empty
Between position units 10, vestibular model unit 11, movement velocity, acceleration unit 12 and wash out model unit 13;
Described manipulation control input unit 1, tested control load system unit 2, computer 3, tester 4 sequentially connect
Connect;Simulated flight TU task unit 5, pilot guidance control strategy model unit 6, nominal stick force displacement unit 7, aircraft dynamics
Model unit 8 is sequentially connected with, and pilot guidance control strategy model unit 6 is also connected with tested control load system unit 2;Fly
Dynamics model unit 8 and aircraft space position units 10, wash out model unit 13 and be connected respectively;Aircraft space position units
10 are connected with visual experience model unit 9;Visual experience model unit 9 is also with pilot guidance control strategy model unit 6 even
Connect;Wash out model unit 13 to be sequentially connected with vestibular model unit 11, movement velocity, acceleration unit 12;Vestibular model unit
11 are also connected with pilot guidance control strategy model unit 6;
After determining the aerial mission of simulated flight TU task unit 5, this aerial mission is as pilot guidance control strategy mould
The input of type unit 6, resolves through pilot guidance control strategy model unit 6 and obtains steering force, export to nominal stick force displacement
Unit 7, nominal stick force displacement unit 7 output manipulation is displaced to aircraft dynamics model unit 8, through aircraft dynamics model unit
8 calculate aircraft space position, are input to aircraft space position units 10 and export visual experience model unit 9 again;Aircraft moves
Mechanical model unit 8 is by resolving the aircraft linear acceleration obtaining, the aircraft overload signal such as angular speed exports and washes out model unit
13, obtain simulator kinematic system linear acceleration and angular speed through washing out after model unit 13 resolves, result is given motion angle
Speed, linear acceleration unit 12, export to vestibular model unit 11 through angular velocity of satellite motion, linear acceleration unit 12, pilot grasps
Vertical control strategy model unit 6 is according in visual experience model unit 9, vestibular model unit 11, simulated flight TU task unit 5
Hold and carry out next step decision-making;
IIth, the flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus based on design, set up a kind of flight simulator stick force
The comprehensive evaluation index model that fidelity of simulation evaluation method uses, is stored in computer 3, including:
1. consider that stick force follows the tracks of the error criterion of quality:
In formula, fp(t),fr(t),fyT () is the expectation stick force of pitching, inclination, yaw direction respectively, fpcl(t),frcl
(t),fyclT () is the pitching of control load system, inclination, the actual stick force of yaw direction, E during test respectivelypf,Erf,EyfPoint
It is not the error criterion threshold value of pitching, inclination, yaw direction stick force, tnTest period;
2. consider stick force deflection error index:
Je2Value is 3,2,1,0;Expect the perceived amount that stick force direction and actual stick force direction are same or below people, direction
Error Je2Take zero, otherwise, take 1.This index comprises pitching, inclination, three passage stick force deflection errors of driftage;When pitching, inclination,
Three expectation stick force of driftage and control load system corresponding actual stick force direction during test all unanimously when, Je2=0;When two phases
Hope stick force and control load system corresponding actual stick force direction during test all unanimously when, Je2=1;When an expectation stick force and examination
When testing, control load system is when actual stick force direction is all consistent accordingly, Je2=2;When all differing, Je2=3;
3. overall error index:
Take the weighted average of two error criterions, obtain overall error
In formula, Wi, i=1,2;For weighted value;
4. comprehensive evaluation index model:
In formula,It is control load system pitching, inclination, three channel position steps of driftage respectively
Response rise time and its threshold value;
IIIth, determine the stick force data mated with simulator control load system, actual stick force data is by flight mould
Intend what the force snesor in the tested control load system unit 2 of device stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus obtained;Tested manipulation
The input displacement of load system unit 2 is that pilot guidance control strategy model unit 6 exports;
IVth, the kinetic model of aircraft in flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus, i.e. aircraft power are determined
Learn model unit 8 in kinetic model be:
In above-mentioned model, the aircraft space position of aircraft dynamics model unit 8 output is aircraft space position units
10 input;Aircraft dynamics model unit 8 also exports the linear acceleration of the instantaneous overload of aircraft, and angular speed waits until to wash out model
Unit 13;
Vth, determine the manipulation control strategy model mating with simulator control load system:
Using the kinetic model of aircraft and the aerial mission data of simulated flight TU task unit 5, carry out flight simulator
The debugging that stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus are mated with simulator control load system, determines and simulator control load system
The manipulation control strategy model of coupling;The operator that is stored with pilot guidance control strategy model unit 6 manipulates and controls plan
Slightly Mathematical Modeling is as follows:
In formula, Hves(s),HvisP(s),HvisRS () is vestibular model respectively, visual experience model, nervous centralis model;
wvisP,wvisR,wves, it is corresponding weight coefficient respectively;It is neural decision system model;τ1It is time delay;Wherein, vestibular
Model unit 11 is with regard to the model H of linear acceleration (specific force)ves(s), as shown in Figure 4;
Vestibular model unit 11 with regard to the model of angular speed, as shown in Figure 5;
Visual experience model unit 9 is:
Nervous centralis model in pilot guidance control strategy model unit 6 is:
Neural decision system model in pilot guidance control strategy model unit 6:
Corresponding weight coefficient wvisP=0.15, wvisR=0.35, wves=0.5;
The motion washing out in model unit 13 of moving washes out model and is:
VIth, choose more than four groups different simulated flight tasks, be simulated device control load system stick force input and output number
According to record, obtain actual load aircraft stick force displacement curve;
Three channel position step response rise time of Helicopter Simulator control load system and its threshold value are respectively
For:0.92,0.93,0.8,1,1,1;
Stick force error criterion threshold value Epf=0.1, Erf=0.1, Eyf=0.1,
Test period tn=600,
The weighting W of error criterion1=0.3, W2=0.7;
Table 1 simulated flight task list
Sequence number | Subject |
1 | Traffic patter |
2 | Land in five sides |
3 | Rolling start |
4 | Zigzag maneuvering flight |
5 | Longitudinal acceleration and deceleration flight |
6 | Deceleration under vertical overload accelerates |
7 | Shortest time turns |
8 | Spiral |
9 | Helicopter hovers |
10 | From little speed to big speed |
11 | The system failure |
VIIth, input related data, a kind of evaluation method of the simulator stick force fidelity of simulation set up according to step II makes
Comprehensive evaluation index:
Obtain simulating control load system stick force fidelity result.
VIIIth, the flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus of present invention design and simulator stick force used are utilized
The evaluation result of the evaluation method of fidelity of simulation, with pilot's subjective assessment as two groups of sampled datas correlation coefficient rxy,
Come to evaluate the present invention design evaluating apparatus and simulator stick force fidelity of simulation used evaluation method reasonability and can
By property, correlation coefficient rxyComputing formula is stored in computer 3, described correlation coefficient rxyComputing formula is:
Correlation coefficient rxyComputing formula is:
Wherein,
xi, yiIt is two groups of sampled datas respectively;
,It is the mean value of corresponding two groups of sampled datas respectively;
rxyIt is two groups of data coefficient correlations.
rxy=0 is completely uncorrelated;Work as rxyMore related closer to 1, two group of data;rxy=1 is perfectly correlated.
By the data that 14 groups of tests are obtained, use correlation coefficient rxyComputing formula calculates, using the design of the present invention
The flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus evaluation result that method obtains and the coefficient correlation of pilot's subjective assessment
rxy=0.91, and draw correlation curve.From the point of view of result of the test, both achieve goodish uniformity it was demonstrated that the present invention
Flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus method for designing is reasonability and reliable.
Claims (1)
1. flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus method for designing is it is characterised in that comprise the steps:
Ith, a kind of flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus are designed:This device includes manipulating control input unit(1)、
Tested control load system unit(2), computer(3), tester(4)It is sequentially connected with;Simulated flight TU task unit(5), flight
Member manipulates control strategy model unit(6), nominal stick force displacement unit(7), aircraft dynamics model unit(8)It is sequentially connected with,
Pilot guidance control strategy model unit(6)Also with tested control load system unit(2)Connect;Aircraft dynamics model list
Unit(8)With aircraft space position units(10), wash out model unit(13)Connect respectively;Aircraft space position units(10)With regard
Feel and experience model unit(9)Connect;Visual experience model unit(9)Also with pilot guidance control strategy model unit(6)Even
Connect;Wash out model unit(13)With vestibular model unit(11), angular velocity of satellite motion, linear acceleration unit(12)It is sequentially connected with;Before
Front yard model unit (11) is also connected with pilot guidance control strategy model unit (6);
Determine simulated flight TU task unit(5)Aerial mission after, this aerial mission is as pilot guidance control strategy model
Unit(6)Input, through pilot guidance control strategy model unit(6)Resolving obtains steering force, exports to nominal stick force position
Move unit(7), nominal stick force displacement unit(7)Output manipulation is displaced to aircraft dynamics model unit(8), through aircraft dynamics
Model unit(8)Calculate aircraft space position, be input to aircraft space position units(10)Export visual experience model again
Unit(9);Aircraft dynamics model unit(8)By resolving, the aircraft linear acceleration obtaining, angular speed export and wash out model list
Unit(13), through washing out model unit(13)Obtain simulator kinematic system linear acceleration and angular speed after resolving, result is given
Angular velocity of satellite motion, linear acceleration unit(12), through angular velocity of satellite motion, linear acceleration unit(12)Export to vestibular model unit
(11), pilot guidance control strategy model unit(6)According to visual experience model unit(9), vestibular model unit(11), mould
Intend aerial mission unit(5)Carry out next step decision-making;Based on flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus, set up a kind of
The comprehensive evaluation index model that flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluation method uses, is stored in computer(3)In;
Comprehensive evaluation index model:
Formula(1)In,It is control load system pitching, inclination, three channel positions of driftage respectively
Step response rise time and its threshold value;
IIth, set up a kind of comprehensive evaluation index model of flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluation method use to include:
Stick force tracking error index:
Formula(2)In,It is the expectation stick force of pitching, inclination, yaw direction respectively,It is the pitching of control load system, inclination, the actual stick force of yaw direction during test respectively,It is the error criterion threshold value of pitching, inclination, yaw direction stick force respectively,Test period;
2. stick force deflection error index:
Value is 3,2,1,0;This stick force deflection error index comprises pitching, inclination, three passage stick force directions of driftage by mistake
Difference;When pitching, inclination, three expectation stick force of driftage are respectively with test, the corresponding actual stick force direction of control load system is consistent
When,=0;When two expectation stick force are respectively with test, the corresponding actual stick force direction of control load system is consistent,=
1;When an expectation stick force with when testing, the corresponding actual stick force direction of control load system is consistent when,=2;When pitching, incline
Tiltedly, when three expectation stick force of driftage are all differed with control load system corresponding actual stick force direction during test,=3;
3. overall error index:
Take stick force tracking error index and the weighted average of stick force two error criterions of deflection error index, obtain overall error
Formula(3)In,For weighted value;
4. comprehensive evaluation index:
Formula(4)In,It is control load system pitching, inclination, three channel positions of driftage respectively
Step response rise time and its threshold value;
IIIth, determine the stick force data mated with simulator control load system, actual stick force data is by flight simulator
The tested control load system unit of stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus(2)In force snesor obtain;Tested manipulation is born
G system unit(2)Input displacement be pilot guidance control strategy model unit(6)The displacement of output;
IVth, determine the dynamics in the aircraft dynamics model unit (8) of flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus
Model is:
The aircraft space position that aircraft dynamics model unit (8) exports is the input of aircraft space position units (10);Aircraft
Kinetic model unit (8) also exports aircraft linear acceleration, angular speed to washing out model unit (13);
Vth, determine the manipulation control strategy model mating with simulator control load system:
Using the kinetic model of aircraft and the aerial mission data of simulated flight TU task unit (5), carry out flight simulator bar
The debugging that power fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus are mated with simulator control load system, determines and simulator control load system
The manipulation control strategy model joined;The operator that is stored with pilot guidance control strategy model unit (6) manipulates and controls plan
Slightly Mathematical ModelingFormula(5):
Formula(5)In,,,It is vestibular model unit respectively, visual experience mould
Type unit, nervous centralis model unit;It is corresponding weight coefficient respectively;It is god
Through decision system model;It is time delay;
Wherein, vestibular model unit (11) with regard to the model of linear acceleration is:
tA,tL,tsIt is the time constant of linear acceleration model respectively;
dTHIt is the time delay of linear acceleration model;
Vestibular model unit (11) with regard to the model of angular speed is:
TL,TS,TaIt is the time constant of angular speed model respectively;
eTHIt is the time delay of angular speed model;
Visual experience model unit (9) is formula(6):
Nervous centralis model is formula(7):
Neural decision system model is formula(8):
Corresponding weight coefficient
It is formula that the motion washing out in model unit (13) of moving washes out model(9):
VIth, choose traffic patter, landing in five sides, vertical transships that lower deceleration accelerates and longitudinal acceleration and deceleration are flown four groups and different simulated
Aerial mission, is simulated device control load system stick force inputoutput data record, obtains actual load aircraft stick force displacement curve;
VIIth, input related data, a kind of evaluation method use of the simulator stick force fidelity of simulation set up according to step II
Comprehensive evaluation index:
Obtain simulating control load system stick force fidelity result;
VIIIth, the evaluation result that flight simulator stick force fidelity of simulation evaluating apparatus obtain, with pilot's subjective assessment as two
Group sampled data, using the coefficient correlation of this two groups of data, to evaluate reasonability and the reliability of the evaluating apparatus of design, related
Coefficient formulas are stored in computer(3)In, the computing formula of coefficient correlation is formula(10):
Wherein,
;
;
It is two groups of sampled datas respectively;
It is the sampled data that evaluating apparatus evaluation and pilot evaluate respectively;
, it is the mean value of corresponding two groups of sampled datas respectively;
=0, two groups of data are completely uncorrelated;WhenMore related closer to 1, two group of data;=1, the complete phase of two groups of data
Close.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201310745161.9A CN104330976B (en) | 2013-12-31 | 2013-12-31 | Flight simulator rod force simulation fidelity evaluation device design method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201310745161.9A CN104330976B (en) | 2013-12-31 | 2013-12-31 | Flight simulator rod force simulation fidelity evaluation device design method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN104330976A CN104330976A (en) | 2015-02-04 |
CN104330976B true CN104330976B (en) | 2017-02-08 |
Family
ID=52405723
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201310745161.9A Active CN104330976B (en) | 2013-12-31 | 2013-12-31 | Flight simulator rod force simulation fidelity evaluation device design method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN104330976B (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN117690332B (en) * | 2024-02-02 | 2024-04-26 | 北京东方瑞丰航空技术有限公司 | Manipulation guiding method, device, equipment and medium |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102053563A (en) * | 2010-12-27 | 2011-05-11 | 刘宇 | Flight training data acquisition and quality evaluation system of analog machine |
CN102129795A (en) * | 2011-02-18 | 2011-07-20 | 北京航空航天大学 | Airborne weather radar teaching simulation system |
CN102157089A (en) * | 2011-04-01 | 2011-08-17 | 天津中天翔翼航空科技有限公司 | Simulation device for steering wheel of airplane flight simulator |
CN102789171A (en) * | 2012-09-05 | 2012-11-21 | 北京理工大学 | Method and system for semi-physical simulation test of visual unmanned aerial vehicle flight control |
-
2013
- 2013-12-31 CN CN201310745161.9A patent/CN104330976B/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102053563A (en) * | 2010-12-27 | 2011-05-11 | 刘宇 | Flight training data acquisition and quality evaluation system of analog machine |
CN102129795A (en) * | 2011-02-18 | 2011-07-20 | 北京航空航天大学 | Airborne weather radar teaching simulation system |
CN102157089A (en) * | 2011-04-01 | 2011-08-17 | 天津中天翔翼航空科技有限公司 | Simulation device for steering wheel of airplane flight simulator |
CN102789171A (en) * | 2012-09-05 | 2012-11-21 | 北京理工大学 | Method and system for semi-physical simulation test of visual unmanned aerial vehicle flight control |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN104330976A (en) | 2015-02-04 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN106444429A (en) | Flight control simulation system with fault diagnosis capability for unmanned helicopter | |
CN105629958A (en) | Intermittence process fault diagnosis method based on sub-period MPCA-SVM | |
Goupil et al. | Industrial benchmarking and evaluation of ADDSAFE FDD designs | |
CN105606914A (en) | IWO-ELM-based Aviation power converter fault diagnosis method | |
CN106802576B (en) | Flight fault judgment method based on simulation | |
CN104332081B (en) | Method for evaluating flight simulator stick force simulation fidelity | |
CN105334504A (en) | Radar target identification method based on large-boundary nonlinear discrimination projection model | |
Jirgl et al. | The identification possibilities of the measured parameters of an aircraft model and pilot behavior model on the flight simulator | |
CN102968553A (en) | Aircraft landing risk evaluation method | |
CN109523897A (en) | Centrifugal process uranium enrichment cascade operation emulation platform | |
CN104330976B (en) | Flight simulator rod force simulation fidelity evaluation device design method | |
CN112150886A (en) | Method for evaluating validity of data package test flight data of flight simulator | |
CN104462022A (en) | Aircraft dynamics system parameter identifiability analitical method | |
CN109543297A (en) | A kind of modification method of airframe to ejector seat aerodynamic interference | |
Doroftei et al. | Assessing Human Factors for Drone Operations in a Simulation Environment | |
CN110262447A (en) | A kind of ACS closed-loop system Fault Locating Method based on ANN | |
CN104217060B (en) | A kind of undercarriage and pintle dynamic loading coupling analytical method | |
CN110298073B (en) | Gear shifting load dynamic simulation method integrating neural network and physical system model | |
Metalis et al. | Assessment of pilot situational awareness: Measurement via simulation | |
Marcos | Assessment on the ADDSAFE benchmark simulator of an H-infinity fault detection design for aircraft | |
Marcos | Application of H-infinity fault diagnosis to ADDSAFE benchmark: the control surface jamming case | |
CN114756961A (en) | Control system lever force gradient modeling method based on system identification | |
RU2778695C1 (en) | Method for reproducing flight conditions on a flight stand | |
CN210119569U (en) | Aircraft flight performance data test system | |
CN109254535A (en) | A kind of Landing Gear System control law synthesis verification platform |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
C14 | Grant of patent or utility model | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
TR01 | Transfer of patent right | ||
TR01 | Transfer of patent right |
Effective date of registration: 20181112 Address after: Room 402, Electronic Information Building, No. 155 Jinhe Street, Changchun High-tech Industrial Development Zone, 130000 Jilin Province, Northeast Asia Cultural and Creative Science Park, China Patentee after: Jilin Shimi Technology Co., Ltd. Address before: 130022 nanhu road 2222, Changchun, Jilin Patentee before: Military Simulation technical institute of Air force Aviation University of the Chinese People's Liberation Army |