CN104282019A - Blind image quality evaluation method based on natural scene statistics and perceived quality propagation - Google Patents
Blind image quality evaluation method based on natural scene statistics and perceived quality propagation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN104282019A CN104282019A CN201410473339.3A CN201410473339A CN104282019A CN 104282019 A CN104282019 A CN 104282019A CN 201410473339 A CN201410473339 A CN 201410473339A CN 104282019 A CN104282019 A CN 104282019A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- image
- test pattern
- quality
- sampling
- undistorted
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/0002—Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/30—Subject of image; Context of image processing
- G06T2207/30168—Image quality inspection
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Testing, Inspecting, Measuring Of Stereoscopic Televisions And Televisions (AREA)
- Image Analysis (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a blind image quality evaluation method based on natural scene statistics and perceived quality propagation. The method includes the steps of calculating the fields of experts (FoE) gradient response values of a test image and a large number of undistorted natural images, conducting statistics on the histogram distribution of the response values, calculating the KL divergence of the histogram distribution of the response value of the test image and the histogram distribution of the response values of the undistorted natural images to obtain the absolute distortion degree of the test image, extracting the quality perception characteristics from the test image and marked distorted images, finding N marked images most similar to the test image according to the chi-square distances between the characteristics, conducting weighted summation on the quality grades of the marked images to obtain the relative distortion degree of the test image, and obtaining the final prediction image quality grade by combining the two predicted grades. Compared with an existing representativeness reference-free image quality evaluation method, the method is simple and efficient, and a user does not need to mark a large number of samples through manual work.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to image processing techniques, particularly perception visual signal treatment technology.
Background technology
Efficient image perception quality evaluating method is then the gordian technique in multimedia service quality monitoring field.At present, reliable image quality evaluating method is mainly full reference and weak reference type.These methods require to access undistorted former figure information completely.But in the middle of many applied environments, this requirement often cannot meet.
Blind image (non-reference picture) quality evaluating method only needs the information of distorted image self and its perceived quality measurable.The black box projection model that existing blind image quality evaluating method has the learning method of supervision direct training image characteristic sum perceived quality to give a mark often through supporting vector recurrence etc. is for image quality estimation.In order to ensure the robustness of model, these methods need a large amount of handmarking's images for training.Meanwhile, because its black box projects, these methods cannot relation between clear Description Image characteristic sum perceived quality.
Summary of the invention
Technical matters to be solved by this invention is, provides the blind reference image quality appraisement method of the relation between a kind of energy Description Image characteristic sum quality score.
The present invention for solving the problems of the technologies described above adopted technical scheme is, based on the blind image quality evaluating method that natural scene statistics and perceived quality are propagated, comprises the following steps:
Step 1) natural scene statistics:
Calculate expert field FoE (Fields of Experts) the gradient response of test pattern and all undistorted images, and statistics obtains the FoE gradient response histogram distribution P of test pattern respectively
dand the FoE response histogram distribution P of i-th undistorted image
u(i), i=1,2 ..., K, K are undistorted image sum, calculate the relative entropy KL divergence of test pattern and undistorted image
Step 2) perceived quality propagation:
1-1: image texture characteristic is extracted to test pattern, overall Gradient Features and the boundary intensity feature based on down-sampling; The extracting method of the boundary intensity feature of described down-sampling is: carry out 1/8 down-sampling to image, after down-sampling the boundary strength value of each point of image by it in vertical and horizontal direction the maximal value of gradient represent, again to boundary strength value a little carry out statistics with histogram, the histogram after normalization is the boundary intensity feature based on down-sampling;
1-2: the feature cards side distance D calculating test pattern and the distorted image to have marked, the described distorted image marked is carried out by the mode of handmarking the distorted image that picture quality gives a mark;
wherein F
i qand F
i rrepresent i-th proper vector of test pattern respectively, mark i-th proper vector of undistorted image, i={1,2,3} be correspondence image textural characteristics respectively, overall Gradient Features and the boundary intensity feature based on down-sampling;
1-3: mark distorted image to little to large select progressively top n according to feature cards side distance D; And calculate respective weight w according to this N number of feature cards side distance D
n,
d
nrepresent test pattern and the little feature cards side's distance having marked undistorted image to n-th of large select progressively;
1-4: utilize weight w
nto N number of image quality score DMOS having marked distorted image
nbe weighted the prediction mark Q that summation obtains test pattern
pQP,
Step 3) relative entropy KL divergence Q is set
nSSand prediction mark Q
pQPweight parameter, with reference to relative entropy KL divergence Q
nSSand prediction mark Q
pQPobtain final prediction marking Q.
The present invention calculates expert field FoE gradient response to test pattern and a large amount of undistorted natural image, the response histogram distribution of statistical test image and all undistorted images respectively.Again by the KL divergence of both calculating distribution, we can obtain the absolute distortion level of test pattern.Secondly, we to test pattern and the distorted image extraction quality Perception Features that marked, and according to the card side's distance between feature, find the N number of marking image the most similar to test pattern.By the quality score weighted sum by these marking images, the relative distortion level of test pattern can be obtained.Finally, final predicted picture massfraction can be obtained by first two steps prediction marking is grouped together.
The invention has the beneficial effects as follows, compared with in existing representative non-reference picture quality appraisement method, the method is simply efficient, and without the need to a large amount of handmarking's sample.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1: block schematic illustration of the present invention.
Embodiment
For effectively carrying out quality assessment to non-reference picture, the present invention is made up of three steps: natural scene statistic procedure, perceived quality propagation steps, comprehensively to give a mark step.Wherein, natural scene adds up the statistical discrepancy by compare test image and a large amount of undistorted natural image, obtains the assessment of absolute distortion information.And mass propagation is by propagating to test pattern similarly by the quality score of portion markings image, the assessment of relative distortion information can be obtained.Finally, by two module prediction marking are combined to obtain final prediction marking.
The present embodiment realizes on matlab2009b software platform, specifically as shown in Figure 1:
The FoE gradient response of step one, calculating test pattern and selected undistorted image, and the histogram distribution both adding up respectively.Allow P
drepresent the response distribution of test pattern, P
urepresent the response distribution of whole undistorted image.Then the quality score of natural scene statistical module can be expressed as both KL divergences, namely
Difference is distributed with as test pattern distortion then responds with the FoE gradient of undistorted image, when test pattern is fuzzy, then the FoE gradient response distribution of test pattern is flat compared with undistorted image, and when test pattern has noise, then its FoE gradient response distribution there will be folder peak.
Step 2, perceived quality are propagated and are formed primarily of following three steps:
1st step: feature test pattern being extracted to mass-sensitive, comprise image texture characteristic, overall situation Gradient Features and the boundary intensity DSBS feature based on down-sampling, wherein image texture characteristic can pass through SFTA (Segmentation-based Fractal Texture Analysis) feature instantiation, and overall Gradient Features is by GIST feature instantiation.For the extraction of the boundary intensity feature based on down-sampling, first 1/8 down-sampling is carried out to image, after sampling the boundary intensity of each point of image by it in vertical and horizontal direction the maximal value of gradient represent.Then, to boundary strength value a little carry out statistics with histogram, the histogram after normalization is DSBS proper vector, and DSBS feature is for reflecting the blocking effect after compression of images.
2nd step: allow F
i qand F
i ri-th proper vector of expression test pattern and marking image, d (F
i q, F
i r) card side's distance of both expressions, then test pattern and the total characteristic distance of marking image can be expressed as
wherein i={1,2,3} be corresponding SFTA, GIST and DSBS feature respectively.
3rd step: find the 5 width marking image making D minimum, and calculate respective weight w according to their characteristic distance
n:
d
nrepresent test pattern and the little feature cards side's distance having marked undistorted image to n-th of large select progressively;
Then, the prediction of this module marking can be expressed as the weighted sum of the massfraction DMOS of marking image, and the span of massfraction DMOS 0 to 100,0 represents best here, and 100 representatives are the poorest:
Step 3, by being combined by first two steps quality score, final prediction marking can be obtained
Wherein γ is the weight parameter of two modules, and here, we are set to 0.2.
Claims (5)
1., based on the blind image quality evaluating method that natural scene statistics and perceived quality are propagated, it is characterized in that, comprise the following steps:
Step 1) natural scene statistics:
Calculate the expert field FoE gradient response of test pattern and all undistorted images, and statistics obtains the FoE gradient response histogram distribution P of test pattern respectively
dand the FoE response histogram distribution P of i-th undistorted image
u(i), i=1,2 ..., K, K are undistorted image sum, calculate the relative entropy KL divergence of test pattern and undistorted image
Step 2) perceived quality propagation:
1-1: image texture characteristic is extracted to test pattern, overall Gradient Features and the boundary intensity feature based on down-sampling; The extracting method of the boundary intensity feature of described down-sampling is: carry out 1/8 down-sampling to image, after down-sampling the boundary strength value of each point of image by it in vertical and horizontal direction the maximal value of gradient represent, again to boundary strength value a little carry out statistics with histogram, the histogram after normalization is the boundary intensity feature based on down-sampling;
1-2: the feature cards side distance D calculating test pattern and the distorted image to have marked, the described distorted image marked is carried out by the mode of handmarking the distorted image that picture quality gives a mark;
wherein F
i qand F
i rrepresent i-th proper vector of test pattern respectively, mark i-th proper vector of undistorted image, i={1,2,3} be correspondence image textural characteristics respectively, overall Gradient Features and the boundary intensity feature based on down-sampling;
1-3: mark distorted image to little to large select progressively top n according to feature cards side distance D; And calculate respective weight w according to this N number of feature cards side distance D
n,
d
nrepresent test pattern and the little feature cards side's distance having marked undistorted image to n-th of large select progressively;
1-4: utilize weight w
nto N number of image quality score DMOS having marked distorted image
nbe weighted the prediction mark Q that summation obtains test pattern
pQP,
Step 3) relative entropy KL divergence Q is set
nSSand prediction mark Q
pQPweight parameter, with reference to relative entropy KL divergence Q
nSSand prediction mark Q
pQPobtain final prediction marking Q.
2. as claimed in claim 1 based on the blind image quality evaluating method that natural scene statistics and perceived quality are propagated, it is characterized in that, described prediction marking Q is finally
γ is weight parameter.
3., as claimed in claim 2 based on the blind image quality evaluating method that natural scene statistics and perceived quality are propagated, it is characterized in that, γ=0.2.
4., as claimed in claim 1 based on the blind image quality evaluating method that natural scene statistics and perceived quality are propagated, it is characterized in that, described down-sampling is 1/8 down-sampling.
5., as claimed in claim 1 based on the blind image quality evaluating method that natural scene statistics and perceived quality are propagated, it is characterized in that, N=5.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410473339.3A CN104282019B (en) | 2014-09-16 | 2014-09-16 | Based on the blind image quality evaluating method that natural scene statistics and perceived quality are propagated |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410473339.3A CN104282019B (en) | 2014-09-16 | 2014-09-16 | Based on the blind image quality evaluating method that natural scene statistics and perceived quality are propagated |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN104282019A true CN104282019A (en) | 2015-01-14 |
CN104282019B CN104282019B (en) | 2017-06-13 |
Family
ID=52256869
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410473339.3A Expired - Fee Related CN104282019B (en) | 2014-09-16 | 2014-09-16 | Based on the blind image quality evaluating method that natural scene statistics and perceived quality are propagated |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN104282019B (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104902277A (en) * | 2015-06-08 | 2015-09-09 | 浙江科技学院 | Non-reference image quality evaluation method based on monogenic binary coding |
CN106815839A (en) * | 2017-01-18 | 2017-06-09 | 中国科学院上海高等研究院 | A kind of image quality blind evaluation method |
WO2017107867A1 (en) * | 2015-12-22 | 2017-06-29 | 成都理想境界科技有限公司 | Image quality evaluation method and apparatus |
CN109584242A (en) * | 2018-11-24 | 2019-04-05 | 天津大学 | Maximum entropy and KL divergence are without reference contrast distorted image quality evaluating method |
CN109635142A (en) * | 2018-11-15 | 2019-04-16 | 北京市商汤科技开发有限公司 | Image-selecting method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
CN111932521A (en) * | 2020-08-13 | 2020-11-13 | Oppo(重庆)智能科技有限公司 | Image quality testing method and device, server and computer readable storage medium |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR20090108388A (en) * | 2008-04-11 | 2009-10-15 | 엔에이치엔(주) | Method and System for Computing Quality Value of Image |
CN102930545A (en) * | 2012-11-07 | 2013-02-13 | 复旦大学 | Statistical measure method for image quality blind estimation |
CN103258326A (en) * | 2013-04-19 | 2013-08-21 | 复旦大学 | Information fidelity method for image quality blind evaluation |
CN103778636A (en) * | 2014-01-22 | 2014-05-07 | 上海交通大学 | Feature construction method for non-reference image quality evaluation |
-
2014
- 2014-09-16 CN CN201410473339.3A patent/CN104282019B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR20090108388A (en) * | 2008-04-11 | 2009-10-15 | 엔에이치엔(주) | Method and System for Computing Quality Value of Image |
CN102930545A (en) * | 2012-11-07 | 2013-02-13 | 复旦大学 | Statistical measure method for image quality blind estimation |
CN103258326A (en) * | 2013-04-19 | 2013-08-21 | 复旦大学 | Information fidelity method for image quality blind evaluation |
CN103778636A (en) * | 2014-01-22 | 2014-05-07 | 上海交通大学 | Feature construction method for non-reference image quality evaluation |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
ANUSH KRISHNA MOORTHY, ET AL.: "Blind Image Quality Assessment: From Natural Scene Statistics to Perceptual Quality", 《IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING》 * |
QINGBO WU, ET AL.: "No Reference Image Quality Metric via Distortion Identification and Multi-Channel Label Transfer", 《2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS (ISCAS)》 * |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104902277A (en) * | 2015-06-08 | 2015-09-09 | 浙江科技学院 | Non-reference image quality evaluation method based on monogenic binary coding |
WO2017107867A1 (en) * | 2015-12-22 | 2017-06-29 | 成都理想境界科技有限公司 | Image quality evaluation method and apparatus |
CN106910180A (en) * | 2015-12-22 | 2017-06-30 | 成都理想境界科技有限公司 | A kind of image quality measure method and device |
CN106910180B (en) * | 2015-12-22 | 2019-08-20 | 成都理想境界科技有限公司 | A kind of image quality measure method and device |
CN106815839A (en) * | 2017-01-18 | 2017-06-09 | 中国科学院上海高等研究院 | A kind of image quality blind evaluation method |
CN106815839B (en) * | 2017-01-18 | 2019-11-15 | 中国科学院上海高等研究院 | A kind of image quality blind evaluation method |
CN109635142A (en) * | 2018-11-15 | 2019-04-16 | 北京市商汤科技开发有限公司 | Image-selecting method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
CN109584242A (en) * | 2018-11-24 | 2019-04-05 | 天津大学 | Maximum entropy and KL divergence are without reference contrast distorted image quality evaluating method |
CN111932521A (en) * | 2020-08-13 | 2020-11-13 | Oppo(重庆)智能科技有限公司 | Image quality testing method and device, server and computer readable storage medium |
CN111932521B (en) * | 2020-08-13 | 2023-01-03 | Oppo(重庆)智能科技有限公司 | Image quality testing method and device, server and computer readable storage medium |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN104282019B (en) | 2017-06-13 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN103996192B (en) | Non-reference image quality evaluation method based on high-quality natural image statistical magnitude model | |
CN104282019A (en) | Blind image quality evaluation method based on natural scene statistics and perceived quality propagation | |
CN102333233B (en) | Stereo image quality objective evaluation method based on visual perception | |
CN105208374B (en) | A kind of non-reference picture assessment method for encoding quality based on deep learning | |
CN104902267B (en) | No-reference image quality evaluation method based on gradient information | |
CN102421007B (en) | Image quality evaluating method based on multi-scale structure similarity weighted aggregate | |
CN102413328B (en) | Double compression detection method and system of joint photographic experts group (JPEG) image | |
CN103475898A (en) | Non-reference image quality assessment method based on information entropy characters | |
CN103200421B (en) | No-reference image quality evaluation method based on Curvelet transformation and phase coincidence | |
CN101819638B (en) | Establishment method of pornographic detection model and pornographic detection method | |
CN106447646A (en) | Quality blind evaluation method for unmanned aerial vehicle image | |
CN101561932B (en) | Method and device for detecting real-time movement target under dynamic and complicated background | |
CN103955926A (en) | Method for remote sensing image change detection based on Semi-NMF | |
CN104658001A (en) | Non-reference asymmetric distorted stereo image objective quality assessment method | |
CN106447647A (en) | No-reference quality evaluation method of compression perception recovery images | |
CN104268590A (en) | Blind image quality evaluation method based on complementarity combination characteristics and multiphase regression | |
CN106097315A (en) | A kind of underwater works crack extract method based on sonar image | |
CN110766658B (en) | Non-reference laser interference image quality evaluation method | |
CN102722888A (en) | Stereoscopic image objective quality evaluation method based on physiological and psychological stereoscopic vision | |
CN103745466A (en) | Image quality evaluation method based on independent component analysis | |
CN105528776A (en) | SDP quality evaluation method for image format JPEG | |
CN104680180A (en) | Polarimetric SAR image classification method on basis of K-Means and sparse own coding | |
CN104376565A (en) | Non-reference image quality evaluation method based on discrete cosine transform and sparse representation | |
CN103679719A (en) | Image segmentation method | |
CN105427313A (en) | Deconvolutional network and adaptive inference network based SAR image segmentation method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee | ||
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20170613 Termination date: 20190916 |