CN104240153A - Site selection evaluation method for aquifer underground gas storage - Google Patents
Site selection evaluation method for aquifer underground gas storage Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN104240153A CN104240153A CN201410482652.3A CN201410482652A CN104240153A CN 104240153 A CN104240153 A CN 104240153A CN 201410482652 A CN201410482652 A CN 201410482652A CN 104240153 A CN104240153 A CN 104240153A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- gas storage
- water
- bearing zone
- addressing
- technical
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 127
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 22
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 42
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 93
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 claims description 42
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000007813 chromatographic assay Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 101100129500 Caenorhabditis elegans max-2 gene Proteins 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 abstract description 89
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 abstract description 20
- 239000003345 natural gas Substances 0.000 abstract description 10
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 abstract description 6
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 abstract description 6
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000004587 chromatography analysis Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000007789 sealing Methods 0.000 description 10
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 9
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000005755 formation reaction Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000004575 stone Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 description 2
- 208000035126 Facies Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 description 2
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical group 0.000 description 2
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003325 tomography Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000019738 Limestone Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003245 coal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012141 concentrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007717 exclusion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000013505 freshwater Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010440 gypsum Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052602 gypsum Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006028 limestone Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004321 preservation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004445 quantitative analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004335 scaling law Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000002639 sodium chloride Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a site selection evaluation method for an aquifer underground gas storage, and belongs to the technical field of natural gas resource exploration and development. The method comprises the following steps: according to the site selection technology, geological safety, economy and social environment characteristics, the suitability corresponding to the technical indexes of the aquifer gas storage candidate site is obtained; determining the weight value of each technical index by adopting a chromatographic analysis method; obtaining the comprehensive building suitability of the aquifer gas storage candidate site according to the suitability corresponding to each technical index and the weight value of each technical index; and obtaining an evaluation result according to a preset aquifer gas storage site selection index suitability grade table. The invention defines the technical principle, the determination method and the steps of the address selection of the aquifer underground gas storage, has strong metering performance and provides a scientific and reasonable technical method for the exploration and the construction of the aquifer underground gas storage.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to natural gas source exploration and development art field, particularly a kind of addressing appraisal procedure of aquifer underground storage reservoir.
Background technology
Rock gas is as a kind of clean energy resource, and the economy had due to it and the feature of environmental protection, be widely applied at civil area and numerous industrial circles.The use amount of city and other industrial sector rock gases often shows obvious peak value because of the difference in season, owing to having irreplaceable effect on peak regulation and guarantee air feed safety, the construction of underground natural gas storage is subject to the attention of more and more national gradually.
Water-bearing zone gas storage and Gas Storages For Depleted Reservoirs are two important kind of pore type underground natural gas storage, China's hydrocarbon-bearing pool is mainly enriched in Continental Facies Stratigraphy, the scale of hydrocarbon-bearing pool is smaller, the potentiality utilizing Depleted Reservoirs to build underground natural gas storage are subject to certain restrictions, and in Paleozoic marine facies source sedimentary formation, find water-bearing zone trap carry out rock gas construction of storage, be expected to set up huge underground, water-bearing zone rock gas gas storage.Especially near large scale industry down town and big city, not have the exhausted oil gas field being suitable for building underground natural gas storage, but water-bearing zone always can be found to construct, in this case, building Aquifer underground natural gas storage just becomes first-elected scheme.
Current research shows, utilize water-bearing zone to construct no matter reconstruction underground natural gas storage is technical difficulty, the risk of building storehouse, the aspects such as storehouse cycle and investment of still founding a capital are higher than depleted gas reservoir and build storehouse.Building water-bearing zone gas storage is a comprehensive complicated systems engineering, and the selection of location, storehouse restricts by several factors, science, rationally, is effectively very important to construction water-bearing zone, object library location gas storage suitability evaluation.But, still do not have a kind of effective method to carry out scientific and effective assessment to the addressing of aquifer underground storage reservoir in prior art.
Summary of the invention
The problem of scientific and effective assessment cannot be carried out to solve prior art to the addressing of aquifer underground storage reservoir, embodiments providing a kind of addressing appraisal procedure of aquifer underground storage reservoir.Described technical scheme is as follows:
Embodiments provide a kind of addressing appraisal procedure of aquifer underground storage reservoir, described method comprises:
Respectively according to addressing technique, geological security, economy and social environment feature, obtain the suitability degree that the technical indicator in gas storage candidate place, water-bearing zone is corresponding;
Adopt the weighted value of chromatographic assays determination all technical;
The weighted value of the suitability degree corresponding according to described all technical and described all technical, what obtain gas storage candidate place, water-bearing zone comprehensively builds storehouse suitability degree;
According to the water-bearing zone gas storage addressing index suitability degree table of grading preset, obtain assessment result.
Wherein, described technical indicator comprises: Trap Typesof, structure closure, buried depth, cap rock lithology, cap rock breakthrough pressure, water-bearing zone thickness, water-bearing zone factor of porosity, water-bearing zone permeability, gas storage storage capacity, gas storage pressure upper limit.
Preferably, described gas storage pressure upper limit is calculated by following formula:
In formula, P
mopfor water-bearing zone gas storage pressure upper limit, P
wfor formation pore pressure above cap rock, P
dfor cap rock breakthrough pressure, σ
hminfor cap rock minimum horizontal principal stress.
Preferably, described gas storage storage capacity is calculated by following formula:
In formula, Q is gas storage storage capacity, and V is water-bearing zone trap volume, T
0for the temperature of rock gas under standard state, T is water-bearing zone temperature, P
0for ground standard pressure, Z is gas deviation factor.
Preferably, described Trap Typesof is arch structure;
The structure closure of trap is more than or equal to 100 meters;
The buried depth of trap is within 250 meters ~ 3500 meters scopes.
Described cap rock lithology is pelyte or evaporitic rock;
Described cap rock breakthrough pressure is more than or equal to 1 MPa.
The clean thickness in described water-bearing zone is more than or equal to 10 meters;
Described water-bearing zone factor of porosity is more than or equal to 5%;
Described water-bearing zone permeability is more than or equal to 10 millidarcies.
Further, the weighted value of described employing chromatographic assays determination all technical comprises:
Using aquifer underground storage reservoir addressing as destination layer, addressing technique, geological security, economy and social environment feature are as rule layer, and technical indicator, as evaluation layer, adopts the weighted value of chromatographic assays determination all technical.
Preferably, the storehouse suitability degree of comprehensively building in water-bearing zone gas storage candidate place is calculated by following formula:
In formula, M be gas storage candidate place, water-bearing zone comprehensively build storehouse suitability degree, ω
ibe weighted value corresponding to the i-th technical indicator, M
ibe suitability degree corresponding to the i-th technical indicator.
The addressing appraisal procedure of the aquifer underground storage reservoir that the embodiment of the present invention provides, relative to prior art, the present invention adopts site criteria and the computing method of rationality, operating process has obvious accountability, gas storage addressing is made to evaluate scientific and effective more, for the exploration of water-bearing zone gas storage provides scientific and reasonable technical method with construction.
Accompanying drawing explanation
In order to be illustrated more clearly in the technical scheme in the embodiment of the present invention, be briefly described by the accompanying drawing used required in describing embodiment below, apparently, the accompanying drawing in the following describes is only some embodiments of the present invention
.
Fig. 1 is the method flow diagram of the addressing appraisal procedure of a kind of aquifer underground storage reservoir that the embodiment of the present invention provides;
Fig. 2 is the structural representation of a kind of aquifer underground storage reservoir that the embodiment of the present invention provides;
Fig. 3 is water-bearing zone gas storage Integrate evaluation index level structural drawing;
Fig. 4 is water-bearing zone gas storage addressing factor of evaluation weight histogram;
Fig. 5 is inner smooth depression D5 block Permian system end face structural map;
Fig. 6 is inner smooth depression D5 block top ordovician structural map.
Embodiment
For making the object, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention clearly, below in conjunction with accompanying drawing, embodiment of the present invention is described further in detail.
The addressing appraisal procedure of the aquifer underground storage reservoir that the embodiment of the present invention provides, as shown in Figure 1, comprising:
S101, respectively according to addressing technique, geological security, economy and social environment feature, obtain the suitability degree that the technical indicator in gas storage candidate place, water-bearing zone is corresponding.
The weighted value of S102, employing chromatographic assays determination all technical.
S103, weighted value according to suitability degree corresponding to all technical and described all technical, what obtain gas storage candidate place, water-bearing zone comprehensively builds storehouse suitability degree.
The water-bearing zone gas storage addressing index suitability degree table of grading that S104, basis are preset, obtains assessment result.
Adopt a kind of like this addressing appraisal procedure of aquifer underground storage reservoir, relative to prior art, the present invention adopts site criteria and the computing method of rationality, operating process has obvious accountability, gas storage addressing is made to evaluate scientific and effective more, for the exploration of water-bearing zone gas storage provides scientific and reasonable technical method with construction.
The addressing appraisal procedure of the aquifer underground storage reservoir provided in the practical application embodiment of the present invention is carried out in the process of addressing assessment, and concrete implementation step can be as follows:
(1) water-bearing zone gas storage place primary election, be with basin one-level or secondary building unit for research object, evaluate each basin one-level or secondary building unit stores potentiality and geological reservoir suitability, filter out potential target district.After primary election, multiple potential target district or candidate place may be had, just need afterwards to carry out preferably these candidate places.The place that water layer builds storehouse is preferably research object with trap, by source investigations such as place geologic examination, geophysical survey, probing and well testings, carry out trap, water-bearing zone and cap rock specificity analysis, evaluate the suitability that Trap evaluation stores, calculate geological reservoir potentiality, optimize geological reservoir target area.
The data of gas storage addressing evaluation application is more, and quality and the quantity of available information are more, and evaluation result is more reliable.The data of water-bearing zone gas storage addressing can be divided into 4 classes: 1) surface data: landform, population, environmental protection, Land_use change etc.; 2) infrastructure: pipe network connection, accesibility, electric power for, with the distance etc. of major customer; 3) underground data: exploration data, reservoir properties and cap rock sealing, storage capacity is estimated, performance prediction, fluid properties etc.4) development data: drilling activities in the past, the means of production etc.
(2) water bearing strata formation underground natural gas storage should meet the addressing thinking of " gas is deposited live, note enter, adopt and draw; ground is made decision on the ground; underground is taken into account on the ground ", in the artificial gas reservoir that water-bearing zone is formed, reservoir pressure coefficient generally will more than 1.4, rely on the gases at high pressure injected to be drained by water, its security risk is far above the underground natural gas storage of other types.Gas storage site, water-bearing zone must possess following characteristics: enough large storage volume and can the good cap rock of injection, stronger fault sealing capacity, sealing, stable stratum, tectonic activity agensis, suitable hydrodynamics system, industrial degree of ripeness, infrastructure, the level of economic development, environmental problem, public education and to building the social factors such as storehouse attitude will be considered in addition.Addressing mark evaluation standard is divided into geologic feature, engineering characteristic, the large dimension of society-economic performance three, opinion scale is divided into exclusion standard and suitable condition two class.Gas storage place, water-bearing zone screening principle and standard as shown in table 1.
Gas storage place, table 1 water-bearing zone screening principle and standard
(3) key element of water-bearing zone gas storage addressing is determined from 5 aspects such as gas storage trap structure feature, cap rock condition, fault sealing property, water-bearing zone Reservior Conditions, gas storage parameters.Usually as shown in Figure 2, comprise well 1, note/gas recovery well 2, inspection well 3, wherein, gas storage gas reservoir 5 is between water-bearing zone 4 and cap rock 6, and note/gas recovery well 2 is communicated with gas storage gas reservoir 5 for the structure of aquifer underground storage reservoir.Wherein, the technical indicator as key element mainly comprises: Trap Typesof, structure closure, trap area, buried depth, cap rock bulk parameter, cap rock micro-parameter, laterally plugged fault evaluating, fault vertical sealing ability evaluating, water-bearing zone thickness, water-bearing zone factor of porosity, water-bearing zone permeability, gas storage storage capacity, gas storage pressure upper limit etc.
Preferably, water-bearing zone Trap Typesof is that structure scope is large, form steep, the arch structure that form is complete;
Preferably, the Structural range of water-bearing zone trap is not less than 100m;
Preferably, trap buried depth in water-bearing zone is selected within 250m ~ 3500m;
Preferably, cap rock is pelyte (mud stone, shale) or evaporitic rock (rock salt, gypsum);
Preferably, cap rock has certain gas sealingability, and breakthrough pressure is not less than 1MPa;
Preferably, the clean thickness in water-bearing zone is not less than 10m;
Preferably, the factor of porosity in water-bearing zone is not less than 5%;
Preferably, the permeability in water-bearing zone is not less than 10md;
Preferably, water-bearing zone gas storage pressure upper limit P
mopcalculated by following formula:
In formula, P
wfor formation pore pressure above cap rock; P
dfor cap rock breakthrough pressure; σ
hminfor cap rock minimum horizontal principal stress.
Preferably, water-bearing zone gas storage storage capacity Q is calculated by following formula:
In formula, V is water-bearing zone trap volume; T
0for the temperature of rock gas under standard state; T is water-bearing zone temperature; P
0for ground standard pressure; Z is gas deviation factor.
(4) principal risk of water-bearing zone gas storage addressing is mainly preservation condition (cap rock and Lateral plugging), trap character (structural trapping) and water-bearing zone condition (reservoir quality) 3 aspects.The maximum pressure of water-bearing zone gas storage is greater than virgin pressure, is generally 1.4 ~ 1.5 times of virgin pressure, and the integrality of trap and sealing ability are the assessment first elements.The priority analyzing addressing data is: 1. trap sealing; 2. storage capacity; 3. reservoir taste, storage capacity; 4. the gas storage degree of depth; 5. the distance of pipe network; 6. surface condition; 7. with the conflicting of periphery underground activities.Be summarized as the factor of 4 aspects such as addressing technique, geological security, economy and social environment condition, built water-bearing zone gas storage addressing assessment indicator system, as shown in table 2.
Table 2 water-bearing zone gas storage addressing technique index system
(5) using water-bearing zone gas storage addressing overall evaluation system as destination layer; 4 factors such as addressing technique, geological security, economy, environmental protection condition are as rule layer; again using 23 of refinement basic indexs as evaluation layer, set up destination hierarchy model, as shown in Figure 3.
Preferably, application level analytic approach (AHP) determines the weighted value of each basic index.
Preferably, according to " 1 ~ 9 " scaling law, research oriented gas storage expert survey can be carried out to obtain relative importance ratio between influence factor at the same level, development of judgment matrix.
Gas storage addressing comprehensive evaluation (B layer) matrix is:
Weight vector ω
a-B=[0.4600,0.3248,0.0665,0.1486], CR=0.0386 < 0.1, meets condition for consistence.
Addressing technique factor B1 judgment matrix is:
Weight vector ω
b1-C=[0.1065,0.1664,0.2559,0.0358,0.0720,0.3634], CR=0.013 < 0.1, meets condition for consistence.
Geological security factor B2 judgment matrix is:
Weight vector ω
b2-C=[0.3275,0.4126,0.2599], CR=0.046 < 0.1, meets condition for consistence.
Social environmental factor B3 judgment matrix:
Weight vector ω
b3-C=[0.1047,0.637,0.2583], CR=0.033 < 0.1, meets uniform condition.
Economic factors B4 judgment matrix is:
Weight vector ω
b4-C=[0.0979,0.5652,0.2295,0.1073], CR=0.013 < 0.1, meets condition for consistence.
Sealing ability of cap rock C7 judgment matrix is:
Weight vector ω
c7-D=[0.0416,0.105,0.0951,0.2038,0.5545], CR=0.066 < 0.1, meets condition for consistence.
Fault sealing property C8 judgment matrix is:
Weight vector ω
c8-D=[0.50,0.50].
Site stability C9 judgment matrix is:
Weight vector ω
c9-D=[0.4054,0.4806,0.114], CR=0.025 < 0.1, meets condition for consistence.
Water-bearing zone gas storage addressing overall evaluation system bottom factor is C1 ~ C6, D1 ~ D10 and C10 ~ C16, and total rank order filtering is ω
a-C+D=[0.0490,0.0765,0.1177,0.0165,0.0331,0.1672,0.0044,0.0112,0.0101,0.0217,0.0590,0.0670,0.0670,0.0342,0.0406,0.0096,0.0070,0.0424,0.0172,0.0145,0.0840,0.0341,0.0159], as shown in Figure 4.
(6) water-bearing zone gas storage index suitability degree grading standard is determined, in table 3, so that carry out quantitative analysis to the index of correlation of concrete water-bearing zone gas storage addressing.
Table 3 water-bearing zone gas storage addressing index suitability degree table of grading (1)
Table 3 water-bearing zone gas storage addressing index suitability degree table of grading (2)
Table 3 water-bearing zone gas storage addressing index suitability degree table of grading (3)
Table 3 water-bearing zone gas storage addressing index suitability degree table of grading (4)
(7) in conjunction with gas storage candidate site actual conditions, associative list 3 determines each metrics evaluation value M
i(i=1,2 ..., 23), the storehouse Appropriate M that comprehensively builds in candidate place is calculated by following formula:
In formula, ω
ibe weighted value corresponding to the i-th technical indicator, M
ibe suitability degree corresponding to the i-th technical indicator.
Appropriate M is brought in table 4 and contrasts, the suitability degree grade of candidate site can be drawn, determine whether to be applicable to building water-bearing zone gas storage.
Table 4 water-bearing zone gas storage addressing comprehensive suitability degree grade evaluation table
For certain gas storage candidate place, water-bearing zone, area in Ji, water-bearing zone gas storage addressing technique and evaluation method are described.
Embodiment 1:
D5 block geographic position is arranged in certain small towns, area, Ji, and earth's surface is Farmland, relates to multiple rural area, and distance gas distributing system 45km, this district belongs to microseismic area, and the disaster such as earthquake, flood did not occur in recent years.Structure is positioned at smooth depression in projection east side, down warping region big city, North China, is constructed, grow along major fault throw wall by the Reverse Draging Anticline of large city east faults control.Ordovician system top and Permian-carboniferous sandstone top antiform clear, major axis trend for east northeast to.
D5 block Permian system trap area is about 12km
2, closed amplitude 150m, buried depth of top surface 2285m, see Fig. 5.2-d seismic data quality is better, and the fulfilling degree of trap is 90%, and construct more practicable, tomography is less.Rise time method sandstone 2325-2510m, thick 185m.Tested by 5 pieces of sample of sandstone, recording factor of porosity is 5.25% ~ 11.7%.2325.8m ~ 2503.2m well section electric-log interpretation 10 layers, factor of porosity 7.6% ~ 10.9%, permeability 2.38mD ~ 16.02mD.On sandstone, 2200m-2325m is that mud stone concentrates growth section, and thickness 125m is good cap rock.
Embodiment 2:
D5 block Ordovician system trap area is about 4.1km
2, closed amplitude 50m, buried depth of top surface 3075m, see Fig. 6.2-d seismic data quality is general, and the fulfilling degree of trap is low, whether forms the closed performance that effective trap depends on tomography.Ordovician system zone of interest is limestone and pierite mainly, gross thickness 198.6m, factor of porosity 3.5-7.5%, permeability 0.12 ~ 2.0mD; Well testing daily output water 33.7m
3, accumulative product water 111m
3.The Ordovician system is covered Carboniferous system Benxi group-Taiyuan Forma-tion (3047m-3085m) with mud stone, coal petrography for main stratum, thickness 38m is good cap rock.
Carry out conclusion to above-mentioned relevant information and data comprehensive, carry out arrangement screening according to the index parameter needed for the gas storage addressing evaluation of water-bearing zone, the concrete evaluation index value of 2 candidate sites is as shown in table 5.
The table of comparisons 4 is thought, Permian system trap candidate site must be divided into 7.6, belongs to location, suitable storehouse, shows that there is the condition being applicable to building water-bearing zone gas storage this site, and Ordovician system trap candidate site must be divided into 5.97, show that this site is not suitable for building aquifer underground storage reservoir.
Evaluation index | Permian system trap candidate site | Ordovician system trap candidate site |
Water-bearing zone thickness C1 | 10 | 10 |
Water-bearing zone factor of porosity C2 | 6 | 6 |
Trap volume C3 | 6 | 4 |
Water-bearing zone permeability C4 | 6 | 4 |
Buried depth C5 | 6 | 6 |
charACTERISTICS OF TRAP C6 | 10 | 6 |
Cap rock lithology D1 | 8 | 8 |
Depth of cover D2 | 10 | 10 |
Cap rock continuity D3 | 8 | 6 |
Cranny development D4 | 8 | 8 |
Gas sealingability D5 | 8 | 8 |
Vertical sealing ability D6 | 6 | 4 |
Lateral plugging condition D7 | 6 | 4 |
Tectonic movement situation D8 | 8 | 6 |
Regional earthquake characteristics D9 | 8 | 8 |
Surface geology disaster D10 | 8 | 8 |
Location, storehouse region character C10 | 8 | 8 |
With freshwater source relation C11 | 8 | 8 |
Public community environment C12 | 8 | 8 |
Geologic position C13 | 10 | 10 |
Peak modulation capacity C14 | 8 | 4 |
Old well plugged back C15 | 8 | 8 |
Cost of investment C16 | 8 | 8 |
The suitability degree score of each index in gas storage candidate site, table 5 water-bearing zone
The foregoing is only preferred embodiment of the present invention, not in order to limit the present invention, within the spirit and principles in the present invention all, any amendment done, equivalent replacement, improvement etc., all should be included within protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (9)
1. an addressing appraisal procedure for aquifer underground storage reservoir, is characterized in that, described method comprises:
Respectively according to addressing technique, geological security, economy and social environment feature, obtain the suitability degree that the technical indicator in gas storage candidate place, water-bearing zone is corresponding;
Adopt the weighted value of chromatographic assays determination all technical;
The weighted value of the suitability degree corresponding according to described all technical and described all technical, what obtain gas storage candidate place, water-bearing zone comprehensively builds storehouse suitability degree;
According to the water-bearing zone gas storage addressing index suitability degree table of grading preset, obtain assessment result.
2. the addressing appraisal procedure of aquifer underground storage reservoir according to claim 1, it is characterized in that, described technical indicator comprises: Trap Typesof, structure closure, buried depth, cap rock lithology, cap rock breakthrough pressure, water-bearing zone thickness, water-bearing zone factor of porosity, water-bearing zone permeability, gas storage storage capacity, gas storage pressure upper limit.
3. the addressing appraisal procedure of aquifer underground storage reservoir according to claim 2, is characterized in that, described gas storage pressure upper limit is calculated by following formula:
In formula, P
mopfor water-bearing zone gas storage pressure upper limit, P
wfor formation pore pressure above cap rock, P
dfor cap rock breakthrough pressure, σ
hminfor cap rock minimum horizontal principal stress.
4. the addressing appraisal procedure of aquifer underground storage reservoir according to claim 2, is characterized in that, described gas storage storage capacity is calculated by following formula:
In formula, Q is gas storage storage capacity, and V is water-bearing zone trap volume, T
0for the temperature of rock gas under standard state, T is water-bearing zone temperature, P
0for ground standard pressure, Z is gas deviation factor.
5. the addressing appraisal procedure of aquifer underground storage reservoir according to claim 2, is characterized in that,
Described Trap Typesof is arch structure;
The structure closure of trap is more than or equal to 100 meters;
The buried depth of trap is within 250 meters ~ 3500 meters scopes.
6. the addressing appraisal procedure of aquifer underground storage reservoir according to claim 2, is characterized in that,
Described cap rock lithology is pelyte or evaporitic rock;
Described cap rock breakthrough pressure is more than or equal to 1 MPa.
7. the addressing appraisal procedure of aquifer underground storage reservoir according to claim 2, is characterized in that,
The clean thickness in described water-bearing zone is more than or equal to 10 meters;
Described water-bearing zone factor of porosity is more than or equal to 5%;
Described water-bearing zone permeability is more than or equal to 10 millidarcies.
8., according to the addressing appraisal procedure of described aquifer underground storage reservoir arbitrary in claim 1-7, it is characterized in that, the weighted value of described employing chromatographic assays determination all technical comprises:
Using aquifer underground storage reservoir addressing as destination layer, addressing technique, geological security, economy and social environment feature are as rule layer, and technical indicator, as evaluation layer, adopts the weighted value of chromatographic assays determination all technical.
9., according to the addressing appraisal procedure of described aquifer underground storage reservoir arbitrary in claim 1-7, it is characterized in that, the storehouse suitability degree of comprehensively building in gas storage candidate place, water-bearing zone is calculated by following formula:
In formula, M be gas storage candidate place, water-bearing zone comprehensively build storehouse suitability degree, ω
ibe weighted value corresponding to the i-th technical indicator, M
ibe suitability degree corresponding to the i-th technical indicator.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410482652.3A CN104240153A (en) | 2014-09-19 | 2014-09-19 | Site selection evaluation method for aquifer underground gas storage |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410482652.3A CN104240153A (en) | 2014-09-19 | 2014-09-19 | Site selection evaluation method for aquifer underground gas storage |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN104240153A true CN104240153A (en) | 2014-12-24 |
Family
ID=52228166
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410482652.3A Pending CN104240153A (en) | 2014-09-19 | 2014-09-19 | Site selection evaluation method for aquifer underground gas storage |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN104240153A (en) |
Cited By (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104899678A (en) * | 2015-05-08 | 2015-09-09 | 中国电建集团成都勘测设计研究院有限公司 | Quick assessment method for site selection of underground powerhouse cavern of hydropower station |
CN107526710A (en) * | 2017-08-05 | 2017-12-29 | 中山大学 | A kind of place suitability Hierarchy Analysis Method based on Monte Carlo EGS4 method |
CN107818518A (en) * | 2016-09-14 | 2018-03-20 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | A kind of method in quantization signifying oil shale in-situ exploitation constituency |
CN109034619A (en) * | 2018-07-26 | 2018-12-18 | 长江勘测规划设计研究有限责任公司 | A kind of Dumping Sites safe evaluation method based on fuzzy synthesis step analysis |
CN109345082A (en) * | 2018-09-07 | 2019-02-15 | 中国石油集团川庆钻探工程有限公司 | Well position exploration quantitative numerical value screening and evaluating method |
CN109376948A (en) * | 2018-11-19 | 2019-02-22 | 中国石油大港油田勘探开发研究院 | A kind of underground natural gas storage tank science site selecting method |
CN110197440A (en) * | 2019-05-13 | 2019-09-03 | 何满潮 | Underground neutron energy power station site selecting method and system |
CN112362475A (en) * | 2020-11-09 | 2021-02-12 | 重庆科技学院 | Evaluation method for trapped sealing ultimate pressure of oil reservoir type gas storage |
CN112417713A (en) * | 2021-01-24 | 2021-02-26 | 成都创源油气技术开发有限公司 | Evaluation method of fuzzy optimization model of gas storage based on analytic hierarchy process |
CN113281803A (en) * | 2020-02-19 | 2021-08-20 | 中国石油天然气集团有限公司 | Optimization method and system for target area of depleted oil and gas reservoir based on seismic exploration |
CN114676650A (en) * | 2020-12-25 | 2022-06-28 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method for rapidly evaluating reservoir capacity of gas storage reservoir reconstructed from constant-volume water body |
CN116879958A (en) * | 2023-07-17 | 2023-10-13 | 盐城工学院 | Oil gas exploration method and system based on electromagnetic method |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4149598A (en) * | 1977-04-11 | 1979-04-17 | Exxon Production Research Company | Recovery of gas from water drive gas reservoirs |
CN102721407A (en) * | 2012-07-06 | 2012-10-10 | 中国石油大学(华东) | Device and method for measuring ground surface settlement of underground salt cavern gas storage |
-
2014
- 2014-09-19 CN CN201410482652.3A patent/CN104240153A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4149598A (en) * | 1977-04-11 | 1979-04-17 | Exxon Production Research Company | Recovery of gas from water drive gas reservoirs |
CN102721407A (en) * | 2012-07-06 | 2012-10-10 | 中国石油大学(华东) | Device and method for measuring ground surface settlement of underground salt cavern gas storage |
Non-Patent Citations (5)
Title |
---|
井文君 等: "基于层次分析法的盐穴储气库选址评价方法研究", 《岩土力学》 * |
康永尚 等: "调峰地下含水层储气库库址优选定量决策方法", 《地球科学—中国地质大学学报》 * |
张森琦 等: "规模化深部咸水含水层CO2地质储存选址方法研究", 《中国地质》 * |
李玥洋 等: "储气库建设条件筛选与优化", 《西南石油大学学报(自然科学版)》 * |
陈茂祥 等: "《天然气工业管理实用手册》", 28 February 2005 * |
Cited By (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104899678A (en) * | 2015-05-08 | 2015-09-09 | 中国电建集团成都勘测设计研究院有限公司 | Quick assessment method for site selection of underground powerhouse cavern of hydropower station |
CN107818518A (en) * | 2016-09-14 | 2018-03-20 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | A kind of method in quantization signifying oil shale in-situ exploitation constituency |
CN107526710A (en) * | 2017-08-05 | 2017-12-29 | 中山大学 | A kind of place suitability Hierarchy Analysis Method based on Monte Carlo EGS4 method |
CN109034619A (en) * | 2018-07-26 | 2018-12-18 | 长江勘测规划设计研究有限责任公司 | A kind of Dumping Sites safe evaluation method based on fuzzy synthesis step analysis |
CN109345082A (en) * | 2018-09-07 | 2019-02-15 | 中国石油集团川庆钻探工程有限公司 | Well position exploration quantitative numerical value screening and evaluating method |
CN109376948A (en) * | 2018-11-19 | 2019-02-22 | 中国石油大港油田勘探开发研究院 | A kind of underground natural gas storage tank science site selecting method |
CN110197440A (en) * | 2019-05-13 | 2019-09-03 | 何满潮 | Underground neutron energy power station site selecting method and system |
CN110197440B (en) * | 2019-05-13 | 2021-07-02 | 何满潮 | Underground neutron energy power station site selection method and system |
CN113281803A (en) * | 2020-02-19 | 2021-08-20 | 中国石油天然气集团有限公司 | Optimization method and system for target area of depleted oil and gas reservoir based on seismic exploration |
CN112362475A (en) * | 2020-11-09 | 2021-02-12 | 重庆科技学院 | Evaluation method for trapped sealing ultimate pressure of oil reservoir type gas storage |
CN114676650A (en) * | 2020-12-25 | 2022-06-28 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method for rapidly evaluating reservoir capacity of gas storage reservoir reconstructed from constant-volume water body |
CN112417713A (en) * | 2021-01-24 | 2021-02-26 | 成都创源油气技术开发有限公司 | Evaluation method of fuzzy optimization model of gas storage based on analytic hierarchy process |
CN116879958A (en) * | 2023-07-17 | 2023-10-13 | 盐城工学院 | Oil gas exploration method and system based on electromagnetic method |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN104240153A (en) | Site selection evaluation method for aquifer underground gas storage | |
Ramírez et al. | Screening CO2 storage options in the Netherlands | |
Chevalier et al. | Potential for deep geological sequestration of CO 2 in Switzerland: a first appraisal | |
CN103544361A (en) | Evaluation method of CO2 geological sequestration potential in oil-gas field development | |
CN104389590B (en) | A kind of method of applied geology, geophysics and geochemical method spike oil migration path | |
Liu et al. | Hydrocarbon accumulation model for Neogene traps in the Chengdao area, Bohai Bay Basin, China | |
AlRassas et al. | Integrated static modeling and dynamic simulation framework for CO 2 storage capacity in Upper Qishn Clastics, S1A reservoir, Yemen | |
Chen et al. | Two petroleum systems charge the YA13-1 gas field in Yinggehai and Qiongdongnan basins, South China Sea | |
Xu et al. | Coexistence mechanism of multi-types of reservoir pressure in the Malang depression of the Santanghu basin, China | |
Jiang et al. | Effects of fault activities on hydrocarbon migration and accumulation in the Zhu I Depression, Pearl River Mouth Basin, South China Sea | |
Abbasi et al. | Petroleum geology of the western part of the Central Iran Basin | |
Li et al. | Capacity and suitability assessment of deep saline aquifers for CO 2 sequestration in the Bohai Bay Basin, East China | |
Bai et al. | Evaluating the Sealing Effectiveness of a Caprock‐Fault System for CO2‐EOR Storage: A Case Study of the Shengli Oilfield | |
Shen et al. | Accumulation model based on factors controlling Ordovician hydrocarbons generation, migration, and enrichment in the Tazhong area, Tarim Basin, NW China | |
Llamas et al. | Pre-injection phase: Site selection and characterization | |
Roberts-Ashby et al. | Potential for carbon dioxide sequestration in the Lower Cretaceous Sunniland Formation within the Sunniland Trend of the South Florida Basin, US | |
Martínez et al. | The EU GeoCapacity project—saline aquifers storage capacity in group south countries | |
Rahman et al. | Modeling of groundwater resources of Dhaka city | |
Tian et al. | Geometry, kinematics and dynamic characteristics of a compound transfer zone: The Dongying anticline, Bohai Bay Basin, eastern China | |
CN110244357A (en) | A kind of structure destruction type Foregone pool sentences knowledge method | |
Al-Sudani | Evaluation of Petrophysical Properties of Sadi Formation, South of Iraq | |
Bartosz et al. | Unconventional resources of Silurian and Ordovician in the eastern part of the Baltic basin, NE Poland | |
Junin et al. | CO2 storage capacity assessment of deep saline aquifers in Malaysia | |
Hasegawa et al. | Fault-seal analysis in the Temana field, offshore Sarawak, Malaysia | |
Ruiz | Characterization of the High Island 24L Field for modeling and estimating CO₂ storage capacity in the offshore Texas state waters, Gulf of Mexico |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20141224 |
|
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |