CN104122154B - Method for testing ceramic material fracture toughness by means of instrumented Vickers indentation - Google Patents
Method for testing ceramic material fracture toughness by means of instrumented Vickers indentation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN104122154B CN104122154B CN201410349038.XA CN201410349038A CN104122154B CN 104122154 B CN104122154 B CN 104122154B CN 201410349038 A CN201410349038 A CN 201410349038A CN 104122154 B CN104122154 B CN 104122154B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- fracture toughness
- vickers
- ceramic material
- instrumentation
- work
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Landscapes
- Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a method for testing ceramic material fracture toughness by means of instrumented Vickers indentation. According to the method, the fracture toughness KIC of a ceramic material is determined by virtue of a load-displacement curve and the length of a crack in indentation diagonal direction of an indented material, wherein the load-displacement curve is obtained by means of indenting the ceramic material by a Vickers indenter in an instrumented way. Compared with a conventional indented method, the method disclosed by the invention has the advantages that (1) a KIC formula is built based on elastic-plastic finite element analysis and satisfies the requirement on the equivalent fracture toughness of a crack tip, so that the precision is higher compared with that of the conventional indented method; (2) without distinguishing the cracking forms of cracks, the built KIC formula is applicable to not only semi-coin middle cracks but also Palmqvist radial cracks; (3) the method is applicable to relatively extensive ceramic materials and the relatively extensive test range; (4) the elasticity modulus and the fracture toughness of the ceramic materials can be tested simultaneously, and the problem that the elasticity modulus of the ceramic material needs to be tested in advance by adopting other technical means in the conventional indented method is avoided, so that the test is rapid, convenient and efficient.
Description
Technical field
The invention belongs to material mechanical performance field tests.Specifically related to one kind utilizes instrumentation press fit instrument and vickers
Impression diagonal crack initiation length testing ceramic materials fracture toughness kicMethod.
Background technology
At present, the method for test ceramic materials fracture toughness mainly has face crack bending method (scf), chevron-shaped cut beam method
(cnb), monolateral pre- CRACKED BEAM method (sepb), Single edge notch beam (senb) and conventional indentation method (im).In view of application
The factors such as convenience, efficiency, requirement to sample yardstick, im has a clear superiority compared with scf, cnb, sepb, senb, thus obtains
Extensively apply.Even so, fracture toughness k that conventional indentation method is relied onicComputing formula system is based on semi analytic semiempirical side
Method is set up, and therefore there is many impact conventional indentation method of testing measuring accuracies and application aspect: 1) the method will
The crack initiation face of vickers impression diagonal is assumed to be preferably semicircle crack initiation face geometry, its crackle
Most advanced and sophisticated geometry is unsatisfactory for the required grade k of real crack crackingicValue basic demand;2) k being set up based on semi analytic semi-empirical methodic
Demarcating of its coefficient of computing formula is based on limited ceramic material experimental data, leads to kicThe ceramic material scope that formula is suitable for
Less;3) conventional indentation method needs to distinguish the crack initiation form of vickers impression diagonal: half coin middle crack
(half penny shaped crack or median crack (hpc)) or Pasteur's radial cracking (palmqvist crack
Or radial crack (rc)), and it is directed to semi analytic semiempirical k that two kinds of crack initiation forms are set upicComputing formula is in application
There is transition region k in aspecticValue is discontinuous and is difficult even to judge the problem of transition region crack initiation form;4) tradition pressure
Trace method there is a problem of in advance ceramic material elastic modelling quantity need to being tested by other technological means;5) conventional indentation side
Method there is a problem of leading to because vickers impression drift angle is unintelligible measure impression catercorner length difficulty.
For above-mentioned situation, present invention application dimension theorem and PLASTIC FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS numerical analysis method establish one kind newly
Based on vickers pressure head ceramic materials fracture toughness instrumentation press-in recognition methods.Compared with conventional indentation method, the party
Method has the advantage that (1) kicThe foundation of formula come from PLASTIC FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS numerical analysis meet simultaneously crack tip fracture tough
Property equivalent requirement, thus compared with the semi analytic semiempirical formula of conventional indentation method, there is higher precision;(2) need not measure
Vickers impression catercorner length, it is to avoid what conventional indentation method existed leads to because vickers impression drift angle is unintelligible to measure
The difficult problem of impression catercorner length;(3) k setting upicFormula is not only suitable for half coin middle crack (half penny
Shaped crack or median crack) it is also applied for Pasteur's radial cracking (palmqvist crack or radial
Crack), it is to avoid what conventional indentation method existed not only needs but also the problem of the above-mentioned difference crack initiation form that is not easily distinguishable;(4)
Applicable ceramic material and test scope are wide, can cover instrumentation press-in than work(numerical value from all potteries of 0.3 to 0.71 scope
The ratio of material and vickers impression diagonal crack initiation length and nominal impression catercorner length is from 1.05 to 6 scopes
All test case;(5) test to ceramic material elastic modelling quantity and fracture toughness can be completed, it is to avoid conventional indentation simultaneously
The problem that in advance ceramic material elastic modelling quantity need to be tested by other technological means that method exists, thus test is just
Prompt, efficient.
Content of the invention
It is an object of the invention to provide a kind of ceramic materials fracture toughness instrumentation vickers is pressed into method of testing.With biography
System creasing method is compared, and the inventive method is capable of higher measuring accuracy, need not distinguish crack initiation form, applicable pottery
Ceramic material and test scope are wider, can complete to ceramic material elastic modelling quantity and fracture toughness simultaneously test, it is to avoid tradition
What creasing method existed need to be by the problem that other technological means are tested to ceramic material elastic modelling quantity in advance so that test
Convenient, efficient.
To achieve these goals, the present invention adopts the following technical scheme that:
A kind of ceramic materials fracture toughness instrumentation vickers is pressed into method of testing, and the method utilizes vickers pressure head instrument
Deviceization is pressed into ceramic material gained load-displacement curves and is determined pottery by pressure material impression diagonal crack initiation length
Fracture toughness k of materialic, specifically include following steps:
1) using instrumentation press fit instrument and diamond vickers pressure head, measured material being implemented with a certain maximum loading of pressing in is
pmInstrumentation press-in test, obtain loading of pressing in-displacement curve, determine diamond vickers pressure head using this curve simultaneously
Maximum compression distance hm, the nominal long a=3.5h of impression diagonal halfmAnd nominal hardness
2) pass through to integrate the loading curve in load-displacement curves relation and unloading curve calculating press-in loading work(respectively
wt, unloading work(we, and calculate press-in ratio work(w on this basise/wt;
3) measure the long c of 4 crack initiations half of vickers impression diagonal respectively by light microscope1、c2、c3With
c4, simultaneously by its average c=(c1+c2+c3+c4)/4 are long as the crack initiation half of this instrumentation press-in test, and calculate ratio
Value c/a, adjusts p furthermSize make ratio c/a and ratio work(we/wtMeet relation: 1.05≤c/a≤1.5 and
0.71≥we/wt≥(we/wt)0=0.591-0.194 (c/a) or 1.5 < c/a≤6 and
0.71≥we/wt≥0.3;
4) the nominal hardness h being determined according to instrumentation press-in testnAnd ratio work(we/wtDetermine the Young's modulus of measured material
That is, elastic modelling quantity e=(1-0.22)/{[0.007625(we/wt)6
-0.005516(we/wt)5-0.048401(we/wt)4+0.110937(we/wt)3-0.157669(we/wt)2+
0.170204(we/wt)]/hn-1.32(1-0.072)/1141 }, determine measured material and diamond vickers pressure head simultaneously
The ratio of plane-strain elastic modulus
η=[e/ (1-0.22)]/[1141/(1-0.072)], wherein, the dimension of e is " gpa " (Ji Pa);
5) calculate fracture toughness k of tested ceramic materialic:
kic=(10-6pm/c1.5)[1+fc(c/a)η]fw(we/wt),
Wherein, fc(c/a)=0.0068 (c/a)2- 0.1118 (c/a)+0.8295,
fw(we/wt)=0.0757 (we/wt)2-0.1956(we/wt)+0.1285, kicDimension be(million
Handkerchief rice1/2)、pmDimension be " n " (newton), c and a dimension be " m " (rice).
Compared with conventional indentation method, the invention has the advantages that
(1)kicThe foundation of formula comes from the equivalence that PLASTIC FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS numerical analysis meets crack tip fracture toughness simultaneously
Require, thus compared with the semi analytic semiempirical formula of conventional indentation method, there is higher precision;
(2) need not measure vickers impression catercorner length, it is to avoid conventional indentation method exist because of vickers pressure
Trace drift angle is unintelligible to be led to measure the difficult problem of impression catercorner length;
(3) k setting upicFormula is not only suitable for half coin middle crack (half penny shaped crack or
Median crack) it is also applied for Pasteur's radial cracking (palmqvist crack or radial crack), it is to avoid tradition
What creasing method existed not only needs but also the problem of the above-mentioned difference crack initiation form that is not easily distinguishable;
(4) ceramic material being suitable for and test scope are wide, can cover instrumentation press-in than work(numerical value from 0.3 to 0.71 scope
All ceramic materials and vickers impression diagonal crack initiation length and nominal impression catercorner length ratio from
All test case of 1.05 to 6 scopes;
(5) test to ceramic material elastic modelling quantity and fracture toughness can be completed, it is to avoid conventional indentation method is deposited simultaneously
The problem that in advance ceramic material elastic modelling quantity need to be tested by other technological means, thus test convenient, efficient.
Brief description:
Fig. 1 is instrumentation press-in Load-unload curve and Load-unload work(schematic diagram;
Fig. 2 is based on grade kicThe impression diagonal crack initiation geometric representation that value determines;
Fig. 3 is that finite element numerical analysis gained meets relation: 1.05≤c/a≤1.5 and 0.71 >=we/wt≥(we/wt)0=
0.591-0.194 (c/a) or 1.5 < c/a≤6 and 0.71 >=we/wtK in the case of >=0.3 different c/a and ηic/{(10- 6pm/c1.5)[1+fc(c/a) η] } and we/wtRelation;
Fig. 4 is the k that the present invention is set upicTheoretical error (the k of computing formulaic-eq.(10)-kic-fem)/kic-femWith than work(
we/wtGraph of a relation;
Fig. 5 a is based on conventional indentation method calculating k under different η during c/a=1.05icTheoretical error (kic-traditional-
kic-fem)/kic-femWith ratio work(we/wtGraph of a relation;
Fig. 5 b is based on conventional indentation method calculating k under different η during c/a=1.25icTheoretical error (kic-traditional-
kic-fem)/kic-femWith ratio work(we/wtGraph of a relation;
Fig. 5 c is based on conventional indentation method calculating k under different η during c/a=1.5icTheoretical error (kic-traditional-
kic-fem)/kic-femWith ratio work(we/wtGraph of a relation;
Fig. 5 d is based on conventional indentation method calculating k under different η during c/a=2.25icTheoretical error (kic-traditional-
kic-fem)/kic-femWith ratio work(we/wtGraph of a relation;
Fig. 5 e is based on conventional indentation method calculating k under different η during c/a=3icTheoretical error (kic-traditional-
kic-fem)/kic-femWith ratio work(we/wtGraph of a relation;
Fig. 5 f is based on conventional indentation method calculating k under different η during c/a=4.5icTheoretical error (kic-traditional-
kic-fem)/kic-femWith ratio work(we/wtGraph of a relation;
Fig. 5 g is based on conventional indentation method calculating k under different η during c/a=6icTheoretical error (kic-traditional-
kic-fem)/kic-femWith ratio work(we/wtGraph of a relation;
Fig. 6 a is silicon nitride sample (si3n4) instrumentation loading of pressing in-displacement curve;
Fig. 6 b is zirconium oxide sample (zro2) instrumentation loading of pressing in-displacement curve;
Fig. 6 c is the instrumentation loading of pressing in-displacement curve of Zirconia reinforced alumina sample (zta);
Fig. 6 d is alumina sample (al2o3) instrumentation loading of pressing in-displacement curve;
Fig. 6 e is the instrumentation loading of pressing in-displacement curve of molten silicon sample (fused silica);
Fig. 7 is the long schematic diagram of 4 crack initiations half of vickers impression diagonal.
Specific embodiment
Below by way of combining accompanying drawing, the method for the present invention is described in detail, but these embodiments are only the mesh illustrating
It is no intended to any restriction is carried out to the scope of the present invention.
Present applicant proposes a kind of ceramic materials fracture toughness instrumentation vickers is pressed into method of testing, the method utilizes
Vickers pressure head instrumentation is pressed into ceramic material gained load-displacement curves and is opened by pressure material impression diagonal crackle
Split fracture toughness k that length determines ceramic materialic, specifically include following steps:
1) using instrumentation press fit instrument and diamond vickers pressure head, measured material being implemented with a certain maximum loading of pressing in is
pmInstrumentation press-in test, obtain loading of pressing in-displacement curve, determine diamond vickers pressure head using this curve simultaneously
Maximum compression distance hm, the nominal long a=3.5h of impression diagonal halfmAnd nominal hardness
2) pass through to integrate the loading curve in load-displacement curves relation and unloading curve calculating press-in loading work(respectively
wt, unloading work(we, and calculate press-in ratio work(w on this basise/wt;
3) measure the long c of 4 crack initiations half of vickers impression diagonal respectively by light microscope1、c2、c3With
c4, simultaneously by its average c=(c1+c2+c3+c4)/4 are long as the crack initiation half of this instrumentation press-in test, and calculate ratio
Value c/a, adjusts p furthermSize make ratio c/a and ratio work(we/wtMeet relation: 1.05≤c/a≤1.5 and
0.71≥we/wt≥(we/wt)0=0.591-0.194 (c/a) or 1.5 < c/a≤6 and
0.71≥we/wt≥0.3;
4) the nominal hardness h being determined according to instrumentation press-in testnAnd ratio work(we/wtDetermine the Young's modulus of measured material
That is, elastic modelling quantity e=(1-0.22)/{[0.007625(we/wt)6-0.005516(we/wt)5-0.048401(we/wt)4+
0.110937(we/wt)3-0.157669(we/wt)2+0.170204(we/wt)]/hn-1.32(1-0.072)/1141 }, really simultaneously
Determine the ratio of measured material and the plane-strain elastic modulus of diamond vickers pressure head
η=[e/ (1-0.22)]/[1141/(1-0.072)], wherein, the dimension of e is " gpa " (Ji Pa);
5) calculate fracture toughness k of tested ceramic materialic:
kic=(10-6pm/c1.5)[1+fc(c/a)η]fw(we/wt),
Wherein, fc(c/a)=0.0068 (c/a)2- 0.1118 (c/a)+0.8295,
fw(we/wt)=0.0757 (we/wt)2-0.1956(we/wt)+0.1285,
kicDimension be(MPa rice1/2)、pmDimension be " n " (newton), c and a dimension be " m "
(rice).
The forming process of the present invention described further below.Instrumentation loading of pressing in-displacement curve schematic diagram such as accompanying drawing 1 institute
Show, the longitudinal axis represents loading of pressing in p, transverse axis represents compression distance h, loading curve is 1, unloading curve is 2, loads work(wtRegion is
3, unload work(weRegion is 4.Wherein, the set a certain maximum loading of pressing in of instrumentation press-in is pm, corresponding maximum
Compression distance is hm.With a (hm) represent diamond vickers pressure at maximum compression distance position for the diamond vickers pressure head
Head cross-sectional area, then nominal hardness hnIt is defined as maximum loading of pressing in pmWith diamond vickers pressure head cross-sectional area a (hm)
Ratio, i.e. hn=pm/a(hm).Define instrumentation press-in further and load work(wtWith unloading work(weIt is respectively and implement instrumentation press-in
When diamond vickers pressure head in load phase and unloading phase work done, its value is respectively equal to loading curve and unloading is bent
Line and instrumentation loading of pressing in-enclosed area of displacement curve abscissa.Instrumentation is pressed into ratio work(we/wtFor unloading work(weWith loading
Work(wtRatio.According to hnAnd we/wtSimultaneously utilize inventor propose " testing Young modulus of material through instrumented micron indentation
Method " (horse German army, " material mechanical performance instrumentation be pressed into test philosophy ", National Defense Industry Press, 2010) can determine by
The Young's modulus of material of measuring and monitoring the growth of standing timber that is, elastic modelling quantity e=(1-0.22)/{[0.007625(we/wt)6
-0.005516(we/wt)5-0.048401(we/wt)4+0.110937(we/wt)3-0.157669(we/wt)2+
0.170204(we/wt)]/hn-1.32(1-0.072)/1141 }, can determine that measured material is pressed with diamond vickers simultaneously
The ratio η=[e/ (1-0.2 of the plane-strain elastic modulus of head2)]/[1141/(1-0.072)] (dimension of e is " gpa ").
Set up fracture toughness k for application finite element numerical methodicWith instrumentation press-in parameter, tested ceramic material parameter with
And the functional relation between vickers impression diagonal crack initiation length, diamond vickers pressure head is considered as bullet by us
Gonosome, its elastic modelling quantity and Poisson's ratio are respectively ei=1141gpa and vi=0.07;Measured material is considered as elasticoplastic body, its elasticity
Modulus is respectively e and v=0.2 with Poisson's ratio, and its single shaft true strain-stress relation is by linear elasticity and hollomon power hardening letter
Array becomes, and yield strength and strain hardening exponent use σ respectivelyyRepresent with n, between diamond vickers pressure head and measured material
Coefficient of friction takes definite value 0.15, and instrumentation maximum compression distance is hm, load is pm, vickers impression diagonal crackle opens
Split half a length of c, a length of a=3.5h of nominal impression diagonal halfm.Based on above-mentioned it is assumed that then fracture toughness kicCan be expressed as
Minor function:
kic=fk1(σy, n, e/ (1-v2), ei/(1-vi 2), c, a) (1)
Discounting for crackle, ratio work(w is pressed into instrumentatione/wtImpact, then we/wtCan be expressed as:
we/wt=fw1(σy, n, e/ (1-v2), ei/(1-vi 2)) (2)
Obtained by (2) formula:
(3) formula substitution (1) formula is obtained:
kic=fk2(we/wt, n, e/ (1-v2), ei/(1-vi 2), c, a) (4)
Application dimension ∏ theorem considers the ratio of plane-strain elastic modulus simultaneously Then
(4) formula can be rewritten as:
kic/{[e/(1-v2)]c0.5}=fk3(we/wt, n, η, c/a) and (5)
Similarly, instrumentation maximum loading of pressing in pmCan be represented as following functional relation:
pm=fp1(we/wt, n, e/ (1-v2), ei/(1-vi 2), a) (6)
Apply dimension ∏ theorem, then (6) formula can be rewritten as:
pm/{[e/(1-v2)]a2}=fp2(we/wt, n, η) and (7)
(5) formula and (7) formula are divided by:
kic/(pm/c1.5)=(c/a)2fk3(we/wt, n, η, c/a) and=fk4(we/wt, n, η, c/a) and (8)
The explicit solution of (8) formula can be obtained using finite element numerical computational methods, wherein, realize the k such as crack tipicValue will
The basic step asked is: first, it is assumed that the crack initiation face geometry of vickers impression diagonal is half elliptic,
And equidistantly take 5-7 node as reference mode on the elliptic curve of cracking face, calculate its k respectivelyicValue;Secondly, according to each ginseng
Examine node kicThe size of value is adjusted to its position, and the reference mode after SPL is smoothly connected adjustment is formed newly
Crack initiation face geometry;Finally calculate the reference mode k after adjustmenticValue, and repeat said process up to each reference node
The k of pointicValue difference is less than ± 5%, and that finally realizes crack tip waits kicValue requires.Fig. 2 is based on grade kicThe pressure that value determines
Trace diagonal crack initiation geometric representation, in figure curve " 1 ", " 2 ", " 3 " respectively typical three kinds of crack initiations are several
What shape.
In finite element numerical calculating process, the elastic modelling quantity e of ceramic material respectively value be 70gpa, 200gpa,
400gpa and 600gpa, Poisson's ratio v=0.2, correspondingly η respectively equal to 0.0635,0.1817,0.3634 and 0.5451, hardening
Index n takes 0, yield strength σyValue meet following requirement: when 1.05≤c/a≤1.5,0.71 >=we/wt≥(we/wt)0
=0.591-0.194 (c/a), and when 1.5 < c/a≤6,0.71 >=we/wt>=0.3, ratio c/a take 1.05 respectively, 1.25,
1.5th, 2.25,3,4.5 and 6.Work as kicDimension be、pmDimension be " n ", the dimension of c and a be " m ", and fc
(c/a)=0.0068 (c/a)2During -0.1118 (c/a)+0.8295, Fig. 3 show finite element numerical analysis gained difference c/a and
K in the case of ηic/{(10-6pm/c1.5)[1+fc(c/a) η] } it is pressed into ratio work(w with instrumentatione/wtBetween numerical relation it is clear that it
Approximately meet functional relation, and can determine that this functional relation is by the method for curve matching:
kic/{(10-6pm/c1.5)[1+fc(c/a)η]} (9)
=fw(we/wt)=0.0757 (we/wt)2-0.1956(we/wt)+0.1285 conversion (9) formula, you can derive and utilize
The computing formula that its fracture toughness tested by vickers pressure head instrumentation press-in ceramic material is:
kic=(10-6pm/c1.5)[1+fc(c/a)η]fw(we/wt) (10) wherein, fc(c/a)=0.0068
(c/a)2- 0.1118 (c/a)+0.8295,
fw(we/wt)=0.0757 (we/wt)2-0.1956(we/wt)+0.1285, kicDimension be(million
Handkerchief rice1/2)、pmDimension be " n " (newton), c and a dimension be " m " (rice), Fig. 4 be based on formula (10) calculate kicReason
By error (kic-eq.(10)-kic-fem)/kic-femWith ratio work(we/wtGraph of a relation, wherein, kic-eq.(10)It is based on formula (10)
Fracture toughness result of calculation, kic-femIt is the fracture toughness result of calculation based on finite element numerical analysis;It can be seen that
When than work(in 0.3≤we/wtDuring≤0.5 scope, error | (kic-eq.(10)-kic-fem)/kic-fem|≤7%, and as 0.5 < we/wt
During≤0.71 scope, error | (kic-eq.(10)-kic-fem)/kic-fem|≤10%.
Simultaneously can be to the long a ' of ceramic material vickers impression diagonal half and Vickers by finite element method
HardnessIt is simulated, and then the k to conventional indentation methodicComputing formula is analyzed, wherein,
Anstis formula, Japanese national industrial standard jisr1607, lawn formula, evans formula and niihara formula are respectively such as
Under:
kic-anstis=0.0154 (e/hv)0.5pmc-1.5, (c/a ' >=2) (anstis formula)
kic-jisr=0.018 (e/hv)0.5pmc-1.5, (c/a ' >=2.5) (jisr formula)
kic-lawn=0.0134 (e/hv)0.5pmc-1.5, (1.5≤c/a '≤7) (lawn formula)
kic-evans=0.16hv(a′)2c-1.5, (2≤c/a '≤6) (evans formula)
kic-niihara=0.0181e0.4hv 0.6a′(c-a′)-0.5, (1.25≤c/a '≤3.5) (niihara formula)
kic-niihara=0.0667e0.4hv 0.6(a′)2c-1.5, (c/a ' >=2.5) (niihara formula)
If using kic-traditionalRepresent and gained fracture toughness result is calculated based on above-mentioned formula, then conventional indentation method calculates
kicTheoretical error be (kic-traditional-kic-fem)/kic-fem, Fig. 5 a, Fig. 5 b, Fig. 5 c, Fig. 5 d, Fig. 5 e, Fig. 5 f, Fig. 5 g divide
Do not show under different c/a and η based on conventional indentation method calculate kicTheoretical error (kic-traditional-kic-fem)/kic-fem
With ratio work(we/wtRelation, it can be seen that when than work(in 0.3≤we/wtWhen in the range of≤0.4, error keeps substantially
Constant, and work as than work(in 0.4 < we/wtWhen in the range of≤0.71, then error increases rapid increase with than work(, thus and conventional indentation
Method is compared, and the fracture toughness computing formula that the present invention sets up substantially has accuracy benefits.
Application Example
The tested ceramic material that experiment is selected is silicon nitride sample (si3n4), zirconium oxide sample (zro2), Zirconium oxide plasticizing
Alumina sample (zta), alumina sample (al2o3) and molten silicon sample (fused silica).Application obtains country in advance
Invention patent mandate high precision instrument press fit instrument [horse German army, Song Zhongkang, Guo Junhong, Chen Wei. a kind of high accuracy press fit instrument and
The computational methods of diamond penetrator pressing in sample depth. the patent No.: zl201110118464.9] and diamond vickers pressure head
Instrumentation micro-indentation test is carried out to above-mentioned 5 kinds of ceramic materials, wherein, to si3n4、zro2, zta and al2o3Material, selection is
Big loading of pressing in is 100n, and for silica, the maximum loading of pressing in of selection is 2n.For ensureing the accurate of test result
Property, every kind of material experiment repeats 10 times, and Fig. 6 a, Fig. 6 b, Fig. 6 c, Fig. 6 d, Fig. 6 e are respectively the instrument of above-mentioned 5 kinds of ceramic materials
Device loading of pressing in-shift assays curve.
Using light microscope, vickers impression diagonal is measured respectively to the sample having been carried out instrumentation press-in test
The long c of 4 crack initiations half on direction1、c2、c3And c4, as shown in fig. 7, simultaneously by its average c=(c1+c2+c3+c4)/4 conduct
The crack initiation half of this instrumentation press-in test is long, is put forward test fracture toughness k according to inventor furthericMethod calculate
The fracture toughness of above-mentioned material, result is listed in table 1.
15 kinds of ceramic materials fracture toughness test result averages of table
The test result of the inventive method and the comparison of conventional indentation method and Single edge notch beam (senb) test result
It is listed in table 2.
Table 2 test result of the present invention and the comparison (unit: mpa m of conventional indentation method and senb method test result1 /2)
From table 2 it can be seen that in addition to silica, fracture toughness test value k of remaining 4 kinds of ceramic materialic-eq.(10)With
kic-anstisAll be closer to, its reason can from Fig. 5 c, Fig. 5 d, Fig. 5 e (kic-traditional-kic-fem)/kic-femWith ratio work(we/
wtRelation be explained, when than work(, and c/a is in 2-3 scope,
, the computational accuracy highest of now anstis formula, therefore k are describedic-anstisWith kic-eq.(10)Value is closest;And for
Silica material, due to its ratio work(we/wt=0.69, then (k equally from Fig. 5 aic-traditional-kic-fem)/kic-femWith than work(
we/wtRelation can be seen that the fracture toughness result of calculation of now all conventional indentation methods all relatively limited unit numerical analysis knots
Fruit exceeds about 40%~140%, thus leads to the fracture toughness result of calculation (k of all conventional indentation methodsic-anstis、
kic-lawn、kic-jisr1607、kic-evansAnd kic-niihara) compared with kic-eq.(10)Value is high by about 40%~140%.According to
S.m.wiederhorn (fracture surface energy of glass.j.am ceram.soc.1969,52:99-
105), fracture toughness k of silica materialicValue is about 0.798 mpa m1/2, test result with institute of the present invention construction method
kic-eq.(10)=0.77mpa m1/2Extremely close, thus demonstrating the validity of institute of the present invention construction method.
Additionally, except silica material (not carrying out senb test), the senb experiment of remaining 4 kinds of ceramic materials fracture toughness
Result is pressed into test result and the fracture toughness test result based on conventional indentation method apparently higher than instrumentation, and its reason is
During preparation senb sample, no matter manually how narrow the sample otch of cutting is, and the most advanced and sophisticated radius of curvature of its otch is all the time than nature
The radius of curvature of crack tip is big, thus leading to test result bigger than normal.
Although above the specific embodiment of the present invention being given with detailed description and illustrating, it should be noted that
We can carry out various equivalent changes according to the conception of the present invention and change to above-mentioned embodiment, and function produced by it is made
With still without departing from specification and accompanying drawing covered spiritual when, all should be within protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (1)
1. a kind of ceramic materials fracture toughness instrumentation vickers is pressed into method of testing, and the method utilizes vickers pressure head instrument
Change press-in ceramic material gained load-displacement curves and ceramic material is determined by pressure material impression diagonal crack initiation length
Fracture toughness k of materialic, specifically include following steps:
1) utilizing instrumentation press fit instrument and diamond vickers pressure head that measured material is implemented with a certain maximum loading of pressing in is pm's
Instrumentation press-in test, obtains loading of pressing in-displacement curve, determines diamond vickers pressure head using this curve simultaneously
Big compression distance hm, the nominal long a=3.5h of impression diagonal halfmAnd nominal hardness
2) pass through to integrate the loading curve in load-displacement curves relation and unloading curve calculating press-in loading work(w respectivelyt, unloading
Work(we, and calculate press-in ratio work(w on this basise/wt;
3) measure the long c of 4 crack initiations half of vickers impression diagonal respectively by light microscope1、c2、c3And c4, with
When by its average c=(c1+c2+c3+c4)/4 are long as the crack initiation half of this instrumentation press-in test, and ratio calculated c/
A, adjusts p furthermSize make ratio c/a and ratio work(we/wtMeet relation: 1.05≤c/a≤1.5 and
0.71≥we/wt≥(we/wt)0=0.591-0.194 (c/a) or 1.5 < c/a≤6 and
0.71≥we/wt≥0.3;
4) the nominal hardness h being determined according to instrumentation press-in testnAnd ratio work(we/wtDetermine measured material Young's modulus that is,
Elastic modelling quantity e=(1-0.22)/{[0.007625(we/wt)6-0.005516(we/wt)5-0.048401(we/wt)4+
0.110937(we/wt)3-0.157669(we/wt)2+0.170204(we/wt)]/hn-1.32(1-0.072)/1141 }, really simultaneously
Determine the ratio η=[e/ (1-0.2 of measured material and the plane-strain elastic modulus of diamond vickers pressure head2)]/[1141/(1-
0.072)], wherein, the dimension of e is " gpa " (Ji Pa);
5) calculate fracture toughness k of tested ceramic materialic:
kic=(10-6pm/c1.5)[1+fc(c/a)η]fw(we/wt),
Wherein, fc(c/a)=0.0068 (c/a)2- 0.1118 (c/a)+0.8295,
fw(we/wt)=0.0757 (we/wt)2-0.1956(we/wt)+0.1285,
kicDimension be(MPa rice1/2)、pmDimension be " n " (newton), c and a dimension be " m " (rice).
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410349038.XA CN104122154B (en) | 2014-07-22 | 2014-07-22 | Method for testing ceramic material fracture toughness by means of instrumented Vickers indentation |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410349038.XA CN104122154B (en) | 2014-07-22 | 2014-07-22 | Method for testing ceramic material fracture toughness by means of instrumented Vickers indentation |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN104122154A CN104122154A (en) | 2014-10-29 |
CN104122154B true CN104122154B (en) | 2017-01-18 |
Family
ID=51767654
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410349038.XA Expired - Fee Related CN104122154B (en) | 2014-07-22 | 2014-07-22 | Method for testing ceramic material fracture toughness by means of instrumented Vickers indentation |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN104122154B (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN108262649A (en) * | 2018-01-17 | 2018-07-10 | 沈阳航空航天大学 | A kind of appraisal procedure of cutter single maximum reconditioning thickness |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107451369B (en) * | 2017-08-11 | 2020-06-16 | 山东南山铝业股份有限公司 | Fracture toughness determination method and apparatus |
CN109001064A (en) * | 2018-08-23 | 2018-12-14 | 江苏亨通光导新材料有限公司 | A kind of method of quantitative measurment and evaluation preform polishing effect |
CN109900554B (en) * | 2019-03-29 | 2019-11-08 | 中国石油大学(华东) | A method of fracture toughness is calculated using indentation method |
CN110361263A (en) * | 2019-07-08 | 2019-10-22 | 东南大学 | A kind of efficient single shaft fatigue test load sharing system |
CN114563282B (en) * | 2022-03-18 | 2023-05-23 | 核工业西南物理研究院 | Performance test method for small-size simply supported beam |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN1752736A (en) * | 2004-09-21 | 2006-03-29 | 中国科学院力学研究所 | The impression test function improving method and the modifying device thereof of Material Testing Machine |
CN101710046A (en) * | 2009-12-02 | 2010-05-19 | 马德军 | Method for testing Young modulus of material through instrumented micron indentation |
-
2014
- 2014-07-22 CN CN201410349038.XA patent/CN104122154B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN1752736A (en) * | 2004-09-21 | 2006-03-29 | 中国科学院力学研究所 | The impression test function improving method and the modifying device thereof of Material Testing Machine |
CN101710046A (en) * | 2009-12-02 | 2010-05-19 | 马德军 | Method for testing Young modulus of material through instrumented micron indentation |
Non-Patent Citations (5)
Title |
---|
Conventional Vickers and true instrumented indentation hardness determined by instrumented indentation tests;Seung-Kyun Kang 等;《JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH》;20100228;第25卷(第2期);337-343页 * |
仪器化压入硬度与维氏硬度的关系研究;郭俊宏 等;《机械工程师》;20091231(第6期);74-76页 * |
基于仪器化压入技术的结构陶瓷材料断裂韧性测试;宋仲康 等;《装甲兵工程学院学报》;20120430;第26卷(第2期);参见第86页第1-2栏,第87页图3-4,第87页第1-2栏 * |
基于仪器化压入硬度和功测试材料杨氏模量的方法;马德军;《理化检验-物理分册》;20101231;第46卷(第9期);563-570页 * |
材料弹性模量的仪器化压入测试方法;马德军;《中国有色金属学报》;20101231;第20卷(第12期);2336-2343页 * |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN108262649A (en) * | 2018-01-17 | 2018-07-10 | 沈阳航空航天大学 | A kind of appraisal procedure of cutter single maximum reconditioning thickness |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN104122154A (en) | 2014-10-29 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN104122154B (en) | Method for testing ceramic material fracture toughness by means of instrumented Vickers indentation | |
CN101566542B (en) | Method for extracting fracture toughness of materials | |
CN105784481B (en) | The method that the compression of disk sample obtains material simple stress-strain stress relation | |
CN101710046B (en) | Method for testing Young modulus of material through instrumented micron indentation | |
CN105784508B (en) | A method of characterization monocrystalline Ni based alloy croop properties | |
CN104596846A (en) | Method for correcting elasticity modulus and stress-strain curve in metal material compression test | |
CN103630452B (en) | Based on the material elastic-plastic mechanical parameter instrumentation press-in method of testing of single Vickers pressure head | |
Ogasawara et al. | Limit analysis-based approach to determine the material plastic properties with conical indentation | |
CN101776551B (en) | Method for testing uniaxial strength mean value of material through instrumented microindentation | |
CN112858039B (en) | Inverse analysis method for steel fiber concrete stress-crack width constitutive relation | |
CN106546477B (en) | Test specimen component and test method for the test of fragile material type III Dynamic Fracture Toughness | |
JP2004279083A (en) | Bending test method of frp | |
CN108414379A (en) | A method of indentation Test extraction metal elastic-plastic mechanical parameter in situ | |
CN104198313A (en) | Residual stress detection method based on instrumented indentation technology | |
CN104165814A (en) | Vickers indentation based material elastoplasticity instrumented indentation test method | |
CN107631949A (en) | A kind of plate Anisotropic Plastic parameter identification method based on single cone press-in | |
CN104122152A (en) | Method for determining Vickers hardness of materials based on Vickers instrumented indentation O-P hardness | |
CN103884591A (en) | Monotonic loading test method for residual stress of continuous fiber reinforced metal-matrix composite | |
CN105371996A (en) | Method for measuring residual stress generated by metallic material pressure processing | |
Berto et al. | Simple New Expressions for the Notch Stress Intensity Factors in an Array of Narrow V–Notches Under Tension | |
CN201196613Y (en) | Material fracture toughness test sample without prefabricated crackle | |
CN104237037A (en) | Material elastoplasticity parameter instrumented indentation testing method based on Berkovich indentation | |
Talybly | Boussinesq’s viscoelastic problem on normal concentrated force on a half-space surface | |
Fischer-Cripps | Study of analysis methods of depth-sensing indentation test data for spherical indenters | |
Yosibash | Failure criteria for brittle elastic materials |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
C14 | Grant of patent or utility model | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee | ||
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20170118 Termination date: 20190722 |