CN104044069B - Based on acoustic emission signal optical work sub-surface damage depth prediction approach - Google Patents
Based on acoustic emission signal optical work sub-surface damage depth prediction approach Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN104044069B CN104044069B CN201410317669.3A CN201410317669A CN104044069B CN 104044069 B CN104044069 B CN 104044069B CN 201410317669 A CN201410317669 A CN 201410317669A CN 104044069 B CN104044069 B CN 104044069B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- acoustic emission
- depth
- formula
- grinding
- emission signal
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24B—MACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
- B24B49/00—Measuring or gauging equipment for controlling the feed movement of the grinding tool or work; Arrangements of indicating or measuring equipment, e.g. for indicating the start of the grinding operation
- B24B49/003—Measuring or gauging equipment for controlling the feed movement of the grinding tool or work; Arrangements of indicating or measuring equipment, e.g. for indicating the start of the grinding operation involving acoustic means
Abstract
The present invention relates to a kind of based on acoustic emission signal optical work sub-surface damage depth prediction approach, steps of the method are: set up the optical work sub-surface damage degree of depth and acoustic emission signal relational model;The surface damage degree of depth and acoustic emission signal relational model constant calibration;Sub-surface damage degree of depth on-line prediction is carried out by acoustic emission signal.The present invention is with low cost, and can quickly, accurately, nondestructively predict subsurface stratum crackle expansion depth, reduce processing cost by optimization processing technology parameter and shorten the purpose of follow-up polishing time.
Description
Technical field
The invention belongs to mechanical field, relate to a kind of based on acoustic emission signal optical work sub-surface damage depth prediction side
Method.
Background technology
Sub-surface damage would generally reduce the intensity of optical element, long-time stability, image quality, coating quality and resist sharp
The important performance indexes such as light injury threshold.Grinding for optical element, if it is possible to predict subsurface stratum quickly and accurately
The expansion depth of crackle, it is possible to reduce processing cost by optimization processing technology parameter and shorten the follow-up polishing time
Purpose.In order to predict the expansion depth of subsurface stratum crackle accurately and rapidly, there has been proposed substantial amounts of destructiveness and non-demolition
Property detection method, is very easy to the processing of optical element.The essence of destructive detection method is to utilize angle polishing method, throwing
The physical methods such as photo-engraving process, cross section microscopy and MRF disclose the pattern of subsurface stratum damage, by detection bosom
The position that crackle occurs directly obtains the expansion depth of subsurface stratum crackle to the distance of surface of the work.Destructive detection method is not only
Waste time and energy and inevitably destroy surface of the work, easily cause the inefficacy of workpiece.It addition, destructive detection method is only
Can record the degree of depth of subsurface stratum damage under specific process technology parameter, efficiency comparison is low, is not of universal significance.Non-destructive is examined
Survey method mainly has total internal reflection microscopy based on intensity detection, confocal scanning laser microscopy and quasi-polarized-light technique etc..
Although these methods can quickly detect the degree of depth of subsurface stratum crackle, but measurement result is not directly perceived, precision is relatively low, and tests and set
Standby cost is the highest.
Acoustic emission (Acoustic emission, AE) is that in material regional area, strain energy quickly discharges and wink of producing
Between high frequency elastic stress wave, it with workpiece material, the factor such as the state of grinding condition, wheel face have close relationship, be
One of important detection means of material removal process process.
After the present invention is directed to grinding work piece, its sub-case depth is carried out the needs of fast prediction, has invented one sound and sent out
Penetrate signal RMS and predict grinding work piece sub-surface damage depth computing method.
Summary of the invention
In order to predict the expansion depth of subsurface stratum crackle accurately and rapidly, based on impression Theory of Fracture Mechanics, the present invention carries
Grinding work piece sub-surface damage depth computing method is predicted, by measuring grinding in real time for a kind of acoustic emission signal RMS
The acoustic emission signal of journey, obtains the workpiece sub-surface damage degree of depth.
The technical solution used in the present invention is: a kind of based on acoustic emission signal optical work sub-surface damage depth prediction side
Method, the key step of the method is provided with: set up the optical work sub-surface damage degree of depth and acoustic emission signal relational model, sub-surface
Lesion depths and acoustic emission signal relational model constant calibration, to utilize acoustic emission signal to carry out the sub-surface damage degree of depth the most pre-
Survey.Concrete steps include:
1. set up the optical work sub-surface damage degree of depth and acoustic emission signal relational model
(1) derivation grinding depth and the relational expression of acoustic emission signal
Acoustic emission rms signal becomes approximate ratio relation with normal grinding force:
AERMS=kaeFn (1)
Grinding force formula is:
Fn=K [c1]γ[vw/vs]2ε-1[ap]ε[de]1-ε (2)
In formula, K is than cutting force, and its size depends on workpiece material;
c1The coefficient relevant with sharpening density;
vwWork speed;
vsSpeed of grinding wheel;
apGrinding depth;
deEmery wheel equivalent diameter;
γ, ε dimensionless constant.
Formula (1) is updated in formula (2), obtains the relational expression of grinding depth and acoustic emission signal value, i.e.
(2) derivation grinding surface roughness and acoustic emission signal relational expression
The empirical formula of grinding surface roughness may be used to lower exponential form and represents, i.e.
C in formulaRaThe coefficient relevant with by mill Material Physics mechanical property;
dsGrinding wheel diameter;
bsGrinding wheel width;
faAxial feeding;
K1The coefficient relevant with grinding wheel graininess;
K2The coefficient relevant with sparking out number of times;
K3The coefficient relevant with grinding fluid;
SR grinding surface roughness.
X, y, v, z, q, n dimensionless constant
Formula (3) is substituted into formula (4) relationship expression between grinding surface roughness and acoustic emission signal can be derived
Formula:
(3) relational model between the derivation workpiece surface damage degree of depth and acoustic emission signal
Relational theory model between the grinding sub-surface damage degree of depth and surface roughness is:
In formula,
ak=0.027+0.090 (m-1/3),
Wherein, SSD is the sub-surface damage degree of depth, k0For the correction factor of elastic deformation centering position crack depth, φ is pressure
Head tooth angle, E is elasticity modulus of materials, and H is material hardness, KcFor material fracture toughness, m is a dimensionless constant, and value is situated between
Between 1/3 and 1/2.
After formula (5) is substituted into formula (6), then can obtain the relation mould between the sub-surface damage degree of depth and acoustic emission signal
Type, i.e.
2. the sub-surface damage degree of depth and acoustic emission signal relational model constant calibration
(1) steady statue acoustic emission signal RMS value measures
First being arranged on emery wheel by sensor, the other end of sensor connects capture card, surveys grinding optics with capture card
Workpiece fabrication is launched signal RMS.Steady statue acoustic emission signal RMS value measures before starting, and acoustic emission grinding detected is former
Beginning signal is converted to root-mean-square rms signal AERMS, its expression formula is:
V acoustic emission primary signal in above formula;
The △ T time window cycle.
The most once try processing, stablize grinding status when entering after emery wheel contact workpiece a period of time, measure stable
All sampled points are averaged by acoustic emission rms signal during grinding status, and this value is as steady statue acoustic emission RMS value AERMS。
(2) the detection workpiece sub-surface damage degree of depth
With chemical method for etching detect the workpiece sub-surface damage degree of depth, react with workpiece after preparing chemical solution, by by
The change of layer etching and corresponding etch-rate obtains etch step, then utilizes atomic force microscope, surface profiler etc. to observe
The pattern of sub-surface damage layer under different depth, and then obtain depth S SD of sub-surface damage.
(3) the sub-surface damage degree of depth and acoustic emission signal relational model constant calibration
By in formula (7)It is set to constant m,
Then formula (7) is transformed to
There are two unknown number m and AE on formula (9) the rightRMS, then this formula could be utilized after needing to demarcate the value of formula (9) parameter m
Carry out sub-surface damage depth S SD on-line prediction.Parameter m scaling method is: according to the AE obtained in step (1) and (2)RMSWith
SSD value and formula (9) other parameter values, be calculated the value of m, and the value generation of m returned to the Asia after formula (9) obtains constant calibration
The surface damage degree of depth and acoustic emission signal relational model.
3. utilize acoustic emission signal to carry out sub-surface damage degree of depth on-line prediction
In optical work carries out formal grinding, first gather acoustic emission signal with capture card, utilize formula (8) to incite somebody to action
The acoustic emission primary signal of grinding detection is converted to root-mean-square rms signal, and measures the acoustic emission obtaining under grinding steady statue
Signal RMS value AERMS.According to AERMSValue and the value of formula (9) other parameters, utilize formula (9) to be calculated workpiece Asia table
Surface damage depth S SD, thus realize utilizing acoustic emission signal to carry out workpiece sub-surface damage degree of depth on-line prediction.
The present invention is with low cost, and can quickly, accurately, nondestructively predict subsurface stratum crackle expansion depth, pass through
Optimization processing technology parameter reduces processing cost and shortens the purpose of follow-up polishing time.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is the basic step schematic flow sheet of the present invention;
Fig. 2 is the sub-surface damage degree of depth reasoning flow schematic diagram with acoustic emission signal relational model of the present invention.
Detailed description of the invention
The present invention is further elaborated below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
As depicted in figs. 1 and 2, the optical work that the embodiment of the present invention is selected is K9 glass, and emery wheel is skive, uses
The acoustic emission signal RMS prediction K9 glass sub-surface damage degree of depth, step includes:
1. set up the optical work sub-surface damage degree of depth and acoustic emission signal relational model
The step 1 in foregoing invention content is utilized to obtain the sub-surface damage degree of depth and acoustic emission rms signal relational model:
The 2.K9 glass sub-surface damage degree of depth and acoustic emission signal relational model constant calibration
(1) steady statue acoustic emission signal RMS value measures
First being arranged on skive by sensor, the other end of sensor connects capture card, surveys mill with capture card
Cut transmitting signal RMS in K9 glass process.Steady statue acoustic emission signal RMS value measures before starting, and utilizes formula (8) grinding to be examined
The acoustic emission primary signal surveyed is converted to root-mean-square rms signal AERMS.The most once try processing, when emery wheel contacts workpiece one
Enter after the section time and stablize grinding status, measure acoustic emission rms signal when stablizing grinding status, all sampled points are averaging
Value, this value is as steady statue acoustic emission rms signal AERMS。
(2) the detection K9 glass sub-surface damage degree of depth
The workpiece K9 glass sub-surface damage degree of depth is detected with chemical method for etching, anti-with K9 glass after preparing chemical solution
Should, by successively etching and the change of corresponding etch-rate obtains etch step, then utilize then utilize atomic force microscope,
Surface profilers etc. observe the pattern of sub-surface damage layer under different depth, and then obtain K9 glass sub-surface damage depth S SD.
(3) the K9 glass sub-surface damage degree of depth and acoustic emission signal relational model constant calibration
According to the association attributes of K9 glass, in formula (7), correlation coefficient is taken as: ε=0.87, γ=0.5, y=0.56.And will
In formula (7)Be set to parameter m, then formula (7) is transformed to
There are two unknown number m and AE on formula (9) the rightRMS, then this formula could be utilized after needing to demarcate the value of formula (9) constant m
Carry out sub-surface damage depth S SD on-line prediction.Parameter m scaling method is: according to the AE obtained in step (1) and (2)RMSWith
SSD value and formula (9) other parameter values, be calculated the value of m, and the value generation of m returned to the K9 after formula (9) obtains constant calibration
The glass sub-surface damage degree of depth and acoustic emission signal relational model.
3. utilize acoustic emission signal to carry out K9 glass sub-surface damage degree of depth on-line prediction
In optical work carries out formal grinding K9 glass processing, first gather acoustic emission signal with capture card, to all
Averaging in collection point, this value is as steady statue acoustic emission rms signal, and utilizes formula (8) to be calculated AERMSValue.Root
According to AERMSValue and the value of formula (9) other parameters, utilize formula (9) to be calculated workpiece sub-surface damage depth S SD, from
And realize utilizing acoustic emission signal to carry out workpiece sub-surface damage degree of depth on-line prediction.
Claims (1)
1. one kind based on acoustic emission signal optical work sub-surface damage depth prediction approach, it is characterised in that the step of the method
Suddenly it is:
(1) the optical work sub-surface damage degree of depth and acoustic emission signal relational model are set up
A. grinding depth and the relational expression of acoustic emission signal
Acoustic emission signal rms signal becomes approximate ratio relation with normal grinding force:
(1)
K in formulaaeFor the proportionality coefficient of acoustic emission signal RMS Yu grinding force, AERMSFor acoustic emission signal RMS value;
Grinding force formula is:
(2)
F in formulanGrinding force, in formulaRatio cutting force, its size depends on workpiece material;
The coefficient relevant with sharpening density;
Work speed;
Speed of grinding wheel;
Grinding depth;
Emery wheel equivalent diameter;
γ, ε dimensionless constant;
Formula (1) is updated in formula (2), obtains the relational expression of grinding depth and acoustic emission signal value, i.e.
(3);
B. grinding surface roughness and acoustic emission signal relational expression
The empirical formula of grinding surface roughness may be used to lower exponential form and represents, i.e.
(4)
In formulaThe coefficient relevant with by mill Material Physics mechanical property;
Grinding wheel diameter;
Grinding wheel width;
Axial feeding;
The coefficient relevant with grinding wheel graininess;
The coefficient relevant with sparking out number of times;
The coefficient relevant with grinding fluid;
Grinding surface roughness;
X, y, v, z, q, n dimensionless constant
Formula (3) is substituted into formula (4) and can derive the relational expression between grinding surface roughness and acoustic emission signal:
(5);
C. the relational model between the derivation workpiece surface damage degree of depth and acoustic emission signal
Relational theory model between the grinding sub-surface damage degree of depth and surface roughness is:
(6)
In formula,
,
Wherein, SSD is the sub-surface damage degree of depth, k0For the correction factor of elastic deformation centering position crack depth, φ is pressure head acutance
Angle, E is elasticity modulus of materials, and H is material hardness, KcFor material fracture toughness, m is a dimensionless constant, and value is between 1/3 He
Between 1/2;
After formula (5) is substituted into formula (6), then can obtain the relational model between the sub-surface damage degree of depth and acoustic emission signal, i.e.
(7);
(2) the sub-surface damage degree of depth and acoustic emission signal relational model constant calibration
A. steady statue acoustic emission signal RMS value measures
First being arranged on emery wheel by sensor, the other end of sensor connects capture card, surveys grinding optical work with capture card
During acoustic emission signal, steady statue acoustic emission signalBefore pH-value determination pH starts, the acoustic emission that grinding is detected
Primary signal is converted to root-mean-squareSignal, its expression formula is:
(8)
In above formulaAcoustic emission primary signal;
The time window cycle;
The most once try processing, stablize grinding status when entering after emery wheel contact workpiece a period of time, measure and stablize grinding
Acoustic emission signal during state, all sampled points to be averaged, this value is as steady statue acoustic emission signalValueAE RMS;
B. the detection workpiece sub-surface damage degree of depth
Detect the workpiece sub-surface damage degree of depth with chemical method for etching, react with workpiece after preparing chemical solution, by successively losing
Carve and the change of corresponding etch-rate obtains etch step, then utilize atomic force microscope, surface profiler to observe different deep
The pattern of the lower sub-surface damage layer of degree, and then obtain depth S SD of sub-surface damage:
C. the sub-surface damage degree of depth and acoustic emission signal relational model constant calibration
By in formula (7)It is set to constant μ, then formula
(7) it is transformed to(9)
Formula (9) the right have two unknown number μ and, then this formula could be utilized to enter after needing to demarcate the value of formula (9) parameter μ
Row sub-surface damage depth S SD on-line prediction, parameter μ scaling method is: obtain according in step (1) and (2)With
SSD value and formula (9) other parameter values, be calculated the value of μ, and the value generation of μ returned to the Asia after formula (9) obtains constant calibration
The surface damage degree of depth and acoustic emission signal relational model;
(3) acoustic emission signal is utilized to carry out sub-surface damage degree of depth on-line prediction
In optical work carries out formal grinding, first gather acoustic emission signal with capture card, utilize formula (8) by grinding
The acoustic emission primary signal of detection is converted to root-mean-squareSignal, and measure the acoustic emission letter obtaining under grinding steady statue
Number RMS value AERMS;According to AERMSValue and the value of formula (9) other parameters, utilize formula (9) to be calculated surface, workpiece Asia
Lesion depths SSD, thus realize utilizing acoustic emission signal to carry out workpiece sub-surface damage degree of depth on-line prediction.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410317669.3A CN104044069B (en) | 2014-07-03 | 2014-07-03 | Based on acoustic emission signal optical work sub-surface damage depth prediction approach |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410317669.3A CN104044069B (en) | 2014-07-03 | 2014-07-03 | Based on acoustic emission signal optical work sub-surface damage depth prediction approach |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN104044069A CN104044069A (en) | 2014-09-17 |
CN104044069B true CN104044069B (en) | 2016-12-07 |
Family
ID=51497720
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410317669.3A Active CN104044069B (en) | 2014-07-03 | 2014-07-03 | Based on acoustic emission signal optical work sub-surface damage depth prediction approach |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN104044069B (en) |
Families Citing this family (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP6441056B2 (en) * | 2014-12-10 | 2018-12-19 | 株式会社ディスコ | Grinding equipment |
CN105345663A (en) * | 2015-11-25 | 2016-02-24 | 厦门理工学院 | Grinding wheel device capable of monitoring grinding working conditions in real time |
CN106826565B (en) * | 2017-03-16 | 2018-11-02 | 中国人民解放军装甲兵工程学院 | A method of monitoring abrasion of grinding wheel and grinding burn using grinding force |
CN108284368B (en) * | 2018-01-02 | 2019-06-04 | 重庆大学 | Screw type face accurate grinding roughness prediction technique |
CN108724002B (en) * | 2018-05-31 | 2020-04-21 | 上海理工大学 | Surface roughness calculation method for plane grinding workpiece |
CN109855578B (en) * | 2019-02-28 | 2021-05-07 | 长沙理工大学 | Workpiece internal defect detection method based on surface morphology roughness |
CN110370092B (en) * | 2019-06-28 | 2020-06-26 | 厦门理工学院 | Method, device and equipment for determining roughness of axial surface of longitudinally-ground excircle |
CN110480429B (en) * | 2019-10-17 | 2020-02-28 | 中国科学院宁波材料技术与工程研究所 | Online prediction method for damage depth of subsurface layer of rotary ultrasonic machining of hard and brittle material for vehicle |
CN111618665B (en) * | 2020-05-19 | 2022-03-29 | 南方科技大学 | High-efficiency low-damage processing method and processing device |
CN113776970A (en) * | 2021-09-07 | 2021-12-10 | 福州大学 | Method for testing fracture toughness of brittle material |
CN114799495B (en) * | 2021-12-28 | 2023-06-13 | 华中科技大学 | Laser cutting control method and related device |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN87104127A (en) * | 1987-06-08 | 1988-12-28 | 西安交通大学 | Monitoring method that a kind of cutting tool for CNC machine is damaged and device |
US5166885A (en) * | 1991-01-28 | 1992-11-24 | General Electric Company | Non-destructive monitoring of surfaces by 3-D profilometry using a power spectra |
JPH11183447A (en) * | 1997-12-19 | 1999-07-09 | Nippei Toyama Corp | Method for predicting cracking of material to be machined and machining method and grinding machine employing it |
WO2000039567A1 (en) * | 1998-12-29 | 2000-07-06 | Advanced Material Process Corporation | Non-destructive inspection method for an impact treated surface |
CN101672625A (en) * | 2009-10-13 | 2010-03-17 | 西安交通大学 | Measurement method of thickness of subsurface damaged layer of bucky optical material |
-
2014
- 2014-07-03 CN CN201410317669.3A patent/CN104044069B/en active Active
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN87104127A (en) * | 1987-06-08 | 1988-12-28 | 西安交通大学 | Monitoring method that a kind of cutting tool for CNC machine is damaged and device |
US5166885A (en) * | 1991-01-28 | 1992-11-24 | General Electric Company | Non-destructive monitoring of surfaces by 3-D profilometry using a power spectra |
JPH11183447A (en) * | 1997-12-19 | 1999-07-09 | Nippei Toyama Corp | Method for predicting cracking of material to be machined and machining method and grinding machine employing it |
WO2000039567A1 (en) * | 1998-12-29 | 2000-07-06 | Advanced Material Process Corporation | Non-destructive inspection method for an impact treated surface |
CN101672625A (en) * | 2009-10-13 | 2010-03-17 | 西安交通大学 | Measurement method of thickness of subsurface damaged layer of bucky optical material |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN104044069A (en) | 2014-09-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN104044069B (en) | Based on acoustic emission signal optical work sub-surface damage depth prediction approach | |
CN103148799B (en) | Defect depth measuring method based on logarithm first-order differential peak value method | |
CN107831085B (en) | Method for testing hardness of metal material at different pressing depths | |
CN103995053A (en) | Method for detecting isotropic material surface Young modulus by using surface acoustic wave technology | |
CN104181235A (en) | Virtual time inversion-based sound emission passive imaging method and apparatus thereof | |
CN106840495A (en) | A kind of method for characterizing glass surface residual stress | |
CN107132279A (en) | A kind of component damage Surface SP Tomography localization method based on array ultrasonic surface wave | |
Kalimullah et al. | Multiresolution dynamic mode decomposition (mrDMD) of elastic waves for damage localisation in piezoelectric ceramic | |
CN106168497A (en) | A kind of hard state turning machine stability comprehensive detection system | |
CN105259220B (en) | Crackle conductance measurement method based on four terminal DC potential detection signals | |
Zarei et al. | Laser ultrasonics for nondestructive testing of composite materials and structures: a review | |
CN104089963A (en) | Detection method of subsurface defect of optical glass | |
CN105891548A (en) | Nanoscale optical subsurface damage detection method based on ion sputtering technology | |
CN204988218U (en) | Mechanical seal end wear volume on - line measuring device | |
Zhang et al. | Monitoring for damage in two-dimensional pre-stress scratching of SiC ceramics | |
CN114112132A (en) | System and method for measuring gradient residual stress by laser ultrasonic | |
He et al. | Experimental research on cavitation erosion detection based on acoustic emission technique | |
CN106041737A (en) | Online measurement method for effective cutting depth of plane grinding | |
CN213239790U (en) | Auxiliary tool for manufacturing composite material nondestructive testing reference block | |
Ong et al. | Non-contact measurement techniques for structural health monitoring | |
Lohrberg et al. | Measurement of cavitation erosive aggressiveness by means of structure born noise | |
Taillon et al. | Stochastic impact model: Poisson processes and copulas to model cavitation erosion impacts | |
Bui et al. | Polymer-based capacity micromachined ultrasonic transducer for surface roughness measurement | |
Bayoumi et al. | New approach for reliability assessment of guided wave-based structure health monitoring system on a pipe application | |
CN108205014A (en) | The ultrasonic surface detection method of minor diameter working roll for forged steel cold rolling |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
C14 | Grant of patent or utility model | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |