CN103903481A - Design method for threshold value and envelop wire of near-earth alarm system - Google Patents
Design method for threshold value and envelop wire of near-earth alarm system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN103903481A CN103903481A CN201210574540.1A CN201210574540A CN103903481A CN 103903481 A CN103903481 A CN 103903481A CN 201210574540 A CN201210574540 A CN 201210574540A CN 103903481 A CN103903481 A CN 103903481A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- state
- alarm
- aircraft
- probability
- height
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 32
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 26
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 claims description 26
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000005311 autocorrelation function Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000008358 core component Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004132 cross linking Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009795 derivation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011295 pitch Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013179 statistical model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000528 statistical test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Landscapes
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
- Emergency Alarm Devices (AREA)
Abstract
Description
技术领域 technical field
本发明是一种应用于机载近地告警系统的阈值和包线设计方法,属于近地告警领域。 The invention relates to a threshold and envelope design method applied to an airborne ground proximity warning system, which belongs to the field of ground proximity warning. the
背景技术 Background technique
近地告警系统(Ground Proximity Warning System,GPWS)是近年来广泛应用于军用和民用飞机的航电设备,其主要功能是判断飞机是否存在撞地危险,从而减少可控飞行撞地事故。当飞机存在撞地危险时,近地告警系统向机组人员提供告警指示,防止撞山坠地事故发生,有效提高飞行安全性。 Ground proximity warning system (Ground Proximity Warning System, GPWS) is an avionics device widely used in military and civil aircraft in recent years. When the aircraft is in danger of colliding with the ground, the ground proximity warning system provides warning instructions to the crew to prevent the accident of crashing into the mountain and effectively improving flight safety. the
近地告警的核心组成部分是告警计算,即根据机载交联设备提供的飞机位置等信息,进行告警计算,与设定的告警阈值与包线比较,判断飞机是否存在撞地危险,进而给出各种告警指示。近地告警系统的性能优劣主要在于告警计算与告警阈值的设计,即针对当前飞机的近地状况,提供及时的、合适的告警。 The core component of the ground proximity warning is the warning calculation, that is, according to the aircraft position and other information provided by the airborne cross-linking equipment, the warning calculation is carried out, and compared with the set warning threshold and the envelope, it is judged whether there is a risk of the plane hitting the ground, and then given Issue various warning indications. The performance of the ground proximity warning system mainly lies in the warning calculation and the design of the warning threshold, that is, to provide timely and appropriate warnings for the current aircraft's ground proximity situation. the
针对近地告警系统的性能,需要对告警阈值和包线进行设计与优化,但由于设计到地形高度的复杂多样性,对告警阈值和包线设计造成了一定难度。国内有近地告警系统阈值设计的相关技术研究,但大都是建立在不同地形数据下的大量重复仿真试验的基础上,过程繁琐、复杂耗时,不便于多样化机型近地告警系统的阈值与包线设计、以及实际飞行过程中的实时包线调制等。 For the performance of the ground proximity warning system, it is necessary to design and optimize the warning threshold and envelope, but due to the complexity and diversity of the design to the terrain height, the design of the warning threshold and envelope is difficult. There are related technical researches on the threshold design of the Earth Proximity Warning System in China, but most of them are based on a large number of repeated simulation tests under different terrain data. and envelope design, as well as real-time envelope modulation during actual flight, etc. the
发明内容 Contents of the invention
本发明的目的是改进现有近地告警系统阈值与包线设计的局限性,在建立地形高度的统计模型与状态转移模型的基础上,通过地形高度和航迹高度的比较,计算飞行过程中撞地危险发生的概率;结合近地告警系统的性能分析,提供一种近地告警系统的阈值和包线设计方法,为飞机提供及时有效、误警率较低的告警信息。 The purpose of the present invention is to improve the limitations of the existing ground proximity warning system threshold and envelope design, on the basis of establishing a statistical model of terrain height and a state transition model, by comparing terrain height and track height, calculate the Probability of ground collision risk; combined with performance analysis of ground proximity warning system, a threshold and envelope design method of ground proximity warning system is provided to provide timely and effective warning information with low false alarm rate for aircraft. the
为了实现上述目的,本发明的技术方案为:一种近地告警系统的阈值和包线设计方法,其特征在于该方法包括以下步骤:A、飞行航迹建模:利用飞机当前 的位置和速度信息,对飞行员的响应延迟时间和飞机拉起过程进行建模,计算报警后飞机逃逸飞行的航迹信息;B、地形的统计特性建模:地形高度本身具备马尔可夫特性,利用马尔可夫模型与实际地形数据的自相关函数特征匹配方法,直接采用马尔可夫模型对不同地形类型进行建模;C、地形的马尔可夫状态转移建模:将一定区域范围的地形高度划分为n个状态[y0,y1,…,yn],利用地形高度的马尔可夫性可以计算t时刻高度状态yt转移到t+1时刻高度状态yt+1的概率,建立地形高度的状态转移矩阵 其中,pij=P(yt+1=yj|yt=yi),i,j∈1…n,yi为n时刻的高度状态,yj为n+1时刻的高度状态,计算经过n时刻的状态转移后地形高度的状态概率向量;D、在飞行过程中,根据计算获取t时刻飞机的高度,找到该时刻地形高度高于飞机高度的状态,对这些高度状态的概率进行求和,即获得碰撞态的概率;对于无告警的情况,对飞机正常航迹进行仿真,可以获得无告警情况下飞机发生碰撞的概率,从而可以计算近地告警系统的误警率;对于有告警的情况,对飞机逃逸航迹进行仿真,可以获得有告警情况下飞机发生碰撞的概率,从而可以计算近地告警系统的成功告警率;根据上述仿真计算,可以获得误警率和成功告警率与不同初始条件的关系曲线,即近地告警系统的性能曲线;E、根据误警率和成功告警率与不同初始条件的关系曲线,寻找近地告警系统性能的最佳收益,即误警率低、成功告警率高,获得一定下降速率时最优的报警高度;根据不同下降速率的最优报警高度,获得系统的一系列告警阈值点,实现告警包线设计。 In order to achieve the above object, the technical solution of the present invention is: a threshold and envelope design method of the ground proximity warning system, characterized in that the method includes the following steps: A, flight track modeling: using the current position and speed of the aircraft information, modeling the pilot’s response delay time and the aircraft’s pull-up process, and calculating the track information of the aircraft’s escape flight after the alarm; B. Statistical modeling of the terrain: the terrain height itself has Markov characteristics, and the Markov The autocorrelation function feature matching method between the model and the actual terrain data directly uses the Markov model to model different terrain types; C, Markov state transition modeling of terrain: divide the terrain height of a certain area into n The state [y 0 , y 1 ,..., y n ], using the Markov property of terrain height, can calculate the probability that the height state y t at time t will transfer to the height state y t+1 at time t +1 , and establish the state of terrain height transfer matrix Among them, p ij =P(y t+1 =y j |y t =y i ), i, j∈1...n, y i is the height state at time n, y j is the height state at time n+1, Calculate the state probability vector of the terrain height after the state transition at the n moment; D, in the flight process, obtain the altitude of the aircraft at the t moment according to the calculation, find the state that the terrain height is higher than the aircraft altitude at this moment, and carry out the probability of these altitude states The sum is to obtain the probability of the collision state; for the case of no warning, the simulation of the normal track of the aircraft can obtain the probability of the collision of the aircraft without the warning, so that the false alarm rate of the ground proximity warning system can be calculated; In the case of an alarm, the aircraft escape track is simulated to obtain the probability of an aircraft collision in the event of an alarm, so that the successful alarm rate of the ground proximity warning system can be calculated; according to the above simulation calculation, the false alarm rate and the successful alarm rate can be obtained The relationship curve with different initial conditions, that is, the performance curve of the Earth Proximity Warning System; E. According to the relationship curve between the false alarm rate and the successful alarm rate and different initial conditions, find the best benefit of the performance of the Earth Proximity Warning System, that is, the false alarm rate Low, high success alarm rate, obtain the optimal alarm height at a certain rate of descent; according to the optimal alarm height of different rate of descent, obtain a series of alarm threshold points of the system to realize the design of the alarm envelope.
其中步骤A中,报警后飞机逃逸飞行的航迹信息为:t<tyc时,h=h0+v0·sinθ0·t;tyc<t<tyc+t1q时,
,其中,t为飞行时间,v0为初始飞行速度,θ0为初始航迹角,l0初始水平距离,h0为初始高度,tyc为飞行员响应延迟时间,t1q为飞机拉起时间, 为飞机拉起时的航迹角变化率,θτ为飞机拉起结束后的航迹角。 , where, t is the flight time, v 0 is the initial flight speed, θ 0 is the initial track angle, l 0 is the initial horizontal distance, h 0 is the initial height, t yc is the pilot response delay time, t 1q is the aircraft pull-up time , is the change rate of the track angle when the aircraft pulls up, and θ τ is the track angle after the aircraft pulls up.
其中步骤B和C中,飞行航迹剖面内对一维地形高度进行建模如下: Among them, in steps B and C, the one-dimensional terrain height is modeled in the flight path profile as follows:
yn+1=e-βyn+ξn,其均值为0、方差为σ2,ξn服从 的正态分布; y n+1 =e -β y n +ξ n , its mean value is 0, variance is σ 2 , ξ n obeys normal distribution of
从而得到地形高度各个状态之间的转移概率可以用状态转移矩阵的形式表达: Thus, the transition probability between the various states of terrain height can be expressed in the form of state transition matrix:
其中,转移概率pij(n)表示n时刻由i状态转移到j状态的概率,
本发明从近地告警系统的告警性能需求入手,基于地形高度的马尔科夫性,进行地形高度的马尔科夫状态转移建模,结合飞机的正常飞行航迹和逃逸飞行航迹模型,提供不同初始下降速率和初始飞行高度条件下的成功告警率和误警率,通过选取系统最佳性能收益点来获取告警阈值点,进而进行告警包线的设计,提高近地告警系统的告警性能。针对不同的飞机类型与特征、不同的地形特征类型、不同的飞行特点等需求,利用本发明中的方法,通过改变不同条件设置,均可实现告警阈值与包线的设计,其设计结果能适应复杂多样的实际使用需求,本发明具有很强的工程应用价值。 The present invention starts from the warning performance requirements of the ground proximity warning system, and based on the Markov property of the terrain height, carries out the Markov state transition modeling of the terrain height, and combines the normal flight track and escape flight track models of the aircraft to provide different The successful alarm rate and false alarm rate under the initial descent rate and initial flight altitude conditions, the alarm threshold point is obtained by selecting the best performance gain point of the system, and then the alarm envelope is designed to improve the alarm performance of the ground proximity warning system. For different aircraft types and characteristics, different terrain feature types, different flight characteristics, etc., using the method of the present invention, by changing different condition settings, the design of the warning threshold and envelope can be realized, and the design results can adapt to Complicated and diverse actual use requirements, the present invention has strong engineering application value. the
说明书附图 Attached to the manual
图1是基于大量统计试验的阈值设计方法的原理图。 Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of the threshold design method based on a large number of statistical tests. the
图2是基于马尔可夫状态转移过程的阈值设计方法的原理图。 Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of a threshold design method based on a Markov state transition process. the
图3是正常飞行航迹与逃逸飞行航迹示意图。 Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of a normal flight path and an escape flight path. the
图4是地形高度状态的马尔可夫状态转移过程示意图。 Fig. 4 is a schematic diagram of the Markov state transition process of terrain height state. the
图5是近地告警系统的成功告警率与误警率关系曲线。 Fig. 5 is the relationship curve between successful alarm rate and false alarm rate of the ground proximity warning system. the
图6是近地告警系统的成功告警率、误警率与飞行参数关系曲线。 Fig. 6 is the relation curve of successful warning rate, false warning rate and flight parameters of the ground proximity warning system. the
图7是告警阈值点与告警包络线的示意图。 Fig. 7 is a schematic diagram of an alarm threshold point and an alarm envelope. the
具体实施方式 Detailed ways
传统的近地告警系统阈值与包线设计是建立在不同地形数据下的大量重复仿真试验的基础上,如图1中所示。在每次仿真试验中,地形信息通过随机过程随机建立,试验结果存在一定的局限性和片面性。在新的产品包线设计时,或在某些特殊环境或条件情况下,需要对包线进行调制时,则需要重复上述的大量仿真试验,告警包线设计较为复杂繁琐,不便于包线的适应性调整,同时也不适用于实际动态飞行过程中的实时包线调制。 The threshold and envelope design of the traditional ground proximity warning system is based on a large number of repeated simulation experiments under different terrain data, as shown in Figure 1. In each simulation test, terrain information is randomly established through a random process, and the test results have certain limitations and one-sidedness. In the design of a new product envelope, or in some special environments or conditions, when the envelope needs to be modulated, it is necessary to repeat the above-mentioned a large number of simulation tests. The design of the alarm envelope is complicated and cumbersome, and it is not convenient for the envelope Adaptive adjustment, also not suitable for real-time envelope modulation during actual dynamic flight. the
本发明在近地告警系统的性能分析的基础上进行改进,通过系统性的建模方法,采用基于马尔可夫链的状态转移模型,对近地告警系统的告警性能进行分析。并利用性能分析结果,进一步计算与确立近地告警系统的告警阈值,完成告警包线设计,其基本原理如附图2中所示。 The invention improves on the basis of the performance analysis of the ground proximity warning system, and analyzes the warning performance of the ground proximity warning system by adopting a state transfer model based on a Markov chain through a systematic modeling method. And use the performance analysis results to further calculate and establish the alarm threshold of the ground proximity warning system, and complete the design of the alarm envelope. The basic principle is shown in Figure 2. the
为了完成近地告警系统的阈值和包线设计,需要完成以下工作。 In order to complete the threshold and envelope design of the ground proximity warning system, the following work needs to be completed. the
A、飞行航迹建模步骤 A. Flight path modeling steps
建立飞行轨迹模型,包括无报警情况下的正常轨迹模型以及报警后的逃逸轨迹模型,如附图3中所示。 A flight trajectory model is established, including a normal trajectory model without an alarm and an escape trajectory model after an alarm, as shown in Figure 3. the
在无报警的情况下,飞行航迹为正常飞行轨迹,假定在此过程中飞机不运行其他机动飞行程序,即飞机进行匀速运动,飞机轨迹即为直线,其水平距离与高度如下式所示: In the case of no alarm, the flight track is a normal flight track. Assuming that the aircraft does not run other maneuvering flight procedures during this process, that is, the aircraft moves at a constant speed, the aircraft track is a straight line, and its horizontal distance and altitude are shown in the following formula:
h=h0+v0·sinθ0·t (1) h=h 0 +v 0 sinθ 0 t (1)
l=l0+v0·cosθ0·t l=l 0 +v 0 ·cosθ 0 ·t
其中,t为飞行时间,v0为初始飞行速度,θ0为初始航迹角(向下为正),l0为初始水平距离,h0为初始高度。 Among them, t is the flight time, v 0 is the initial flight speed, θ 0 is the initial track angle (downward is positive), l 0 is the initial horizontal distance, h 0 is the initial height.
对于逃逸飞行轨迹,假定拉起前作匀速运动,拉起时作匀速俯仰,拉起到一定航迹角时停止俯仰,重新开始匀速运动,其水平距离与高度如下所示。 For the escape flight trajectory, it is assumed that it moves at a constant speed before pulling up, pitches at a constant speed when pulling up, stops pitching when pulling up to a certain track angle, and starts to move at a constant speed again. The horizontal distance and height are shown below. the
当飞行员未对报警作出响应,飞机仍然维持直线运动,其水平距离与高度如下式所示: When the pilot does not respond to the alarm, the aircraft still keeps moving in a straight line, and its horizontal distance and altitude are shown in the following formula:
h=h0+v0·sinθ0·t (2) h=h 0 +v 0 sinθ 0 t (2)
l=l0+v0·cosθ0·t l=l 0 +v 0 ·cosθ 0 ·t
当飞行员对报警作出响应,对飞机实施拉起操纵后,飞机航迹方向由向下飞行逐渐变为向上飞行,其水平距离与高度如下式所示: When the pilot responds to the alarm and pulls up the aircraft, the direction of the aircraft's flight path gradually changes from downward flight to upward flight, and its horizontal distance and altitude are shown in the following formula:
当飞机拉起到一定航迹角后,即完成拉起机动,飞机转为直线飞行,其水平距离与高度如下式所示: When the aircraft pulls up to a certain track angle, the pull-up maneuver is completed, and the aircraft turns to fly in a straight line. The horizontal distance and height are shown in the following formula:
其中,tyc为飞行员响应延迟时间,t1q为飞机拉起时间, 为飞机拉起时的航迹角变化率,θτ为飞机拉起结束后的航迹角。 Among them, t yc is the pilot response delay time, t 1q is the aircraft pull-up time, is the change rate of the track angle when the aircraft pulls up, and θ τ is the track angle after the aircraft pulls up.
上述的飞行轨迹推导中对飞行运动进行了简化,若考虑飞行真实性,可不进行简化,同样可根据飞行规则,进行复杂运动的参数推导与计算,获取飞机的正常飞行航迹与逃逸航迹。 The above-mentioned flight trajectory derivation simplifies the flight movement. If the authenticity of the flight is considered, the simplification is not required. The parameters of the complex movement can also be derived and calculated according to the flight rules to obtain the normal flight trajectory and escape trajectory of the aircraft. the
B、地形的统计特性建模步骤 B. Statistical characteristics modeling steps of terrain
在地形高度描述中,采用马尔可夫模型对地形高度进行建模。 In the terrain height description, the Markov model is used to model the terrain height. the
地形是指地球表面的高低起伏,是连续的几何曲面,其高度变化特性满足高斯-马尔可夫性。首先根据地形的起伏程度,对地形进行分类。将60海里内地形高度跨度值划分为5个区间,据此将地形分为5种不同类型,如表1所示。 Terrain refers to the ups and downs of the earth's surface, which is a continuous geometric surface, and its height variation characteristics satisfy the Gauss-Markov property. First, the terrain is classified according to the degree of undulation of the terrain. Divide the terrain height span value within 60 nautical miles into 5 intervals, and accordingly divide the terrain into 5 different types, as shown in Table 1. the
表1地形类型 Table 1 Terrain type
该分类方法的优点在于其分类方式与地形区域无关,只与地形本身的特点有关,因此适用于世界范围内的所有地形。 The advantage of this classification method is that its classification method has nothing to do with the terrain area, but only with the characteristics of the terrain itself, so it is applicable to all terrains in the world. the
由于地形高度本身具备马尔可夫性,因此对地形进行分类后,可以直接采用马尔可夫模型对不同地形进行建模。在近地告警仿真中,只对飞机航迹所在平面内的碰撞情况进行分析,因此只需要建立该剖面内的一维地形模型。 Since the terrain height itself has Markov properties, after the terrain is classified, the Markov model can be directly used to model different terrains. In the ground proximity warning simulation, only the collision situation in the plane where the aircraft track is located is analyzed, so it is only necessary to establish a one-dimensional terrain model in the section. the
均值为0、方差为σ2的马尔可夫模型如公式(5)所示。 A Markov model with a mean of 0 and a variance of σ2 is shown in formula (5).
yn+1=e-βyn+ξn (5) y n+1 =e -β y n +ξ n (5)
其中,ξn服从 的正态分布。 where ξ n obeys normal distribution of .
对于不同类型的地形,地形建模的关键在于模型参数。在真实地形数据库中采集一定数量的数据点,对采样数据进行拟合与特征提取,即可获得模型中的相关参数,如表2中所示。 For different types of terrain, the key to terrain modeling lies in the model parameters. Collect a certain number of data points in the real terrain database, and perform fitting and feature extraction on the sampled data to obtain the relevant parameters in the model, as shown in Table 2. the
表2不同地形类型的模型参数 Table 2 Model parameters of different terrain types
C、地形的马尔可夫状态转移建模步骤 C. Modeling steps of Markov state transition of terrain
在地形高度状态的描述中,采用马尔可夫链建立地形高度状态的转移过程。 In the description of terrain height state, the transfer process of terrain height state is established by using Markov chain. the
初始的地形高度被分为m个区间,根据地形类型不同,每个高度区间值不等,则地形高度对应了m个状态, The initial terrain height is divided into m intervals. According to different terrain types, each height interval has different values, and the terrain height corresponds to m states.
定义的状态向量yn表示在时刻n,xn中各状态处于某一个高度值的概率: The defined state vector y n represents the probability that each state is at a certain height value at time n, x n :
地形高度各个状态之间的转移概率可以用状态转移矩阵的形式表达: The transition probability between the various states of terrain height can be expressed in the form of state transition matrix:
其中,转移概率pij (n)表示n时刻由i状态转移到j状态的概率。 Among them, the transition probability p ij (n) represents the probability of transitioning from state i to state j at time n.
其中,hn为转移初始高度状态即i状态的高度,hn+1为转移目标高度状态,即j状态的高度,Δh为一个地形状态的高度区间。 Among them, h n is the initial height state of the transfer, that is, the height of state i, h n+1 is the transfer target height state, that is, the height of state j, and Δh is the height range of a terrain state.
马尔可夫过程的使用,即随飞行过程的变化,跟踪地形高度的变化。从初始地形高度起,应用上述的状态转移矩阵,可以计算地形处于某一特定高度的概率。即给定地形高度的初始状态概率向量y0,经过n时刻的状态转移后,地形高度的状态概率向量如下: The use of a Markov process, which tracks changes in terrain height as the flight progresses. From the initial terrain height, the probability that the terrain is at a certain height can be calculated by applying the above state transition matrix. That is, given the initial state probability vector y 0 of the terrain height, after the state transition at time n, the state probability vector of the terrain height is as follows:
yn=Tn-1Tn-2…T0y0 (10) y n = T n-1 T n-2 ... T 0 y 0 (10)
获取n时刻地形高度的状态概率向量后,即可计算飞机碰撞发生的概率。如附图4所示,地形高度状态一旦转移到高于航迹的状态,将导致碰撞,这些状态转移将合并到转移为碰撞态的概率,即发生撞地事故的概率,因此n时刻飞机处于碰撞态的概率即为所有高于飞机高度的地形高度状态概率之和。即在n时刻,从上述地形高度的状态概率向量中找到地形高度超出飞机轨迹的所有状态,将其 概率求和即为该时刻发生撞地事故的概率。 After obtaining the state probability vector of terrain height at time n, the probability of aircraft collision can be calculated. As shown in Figure 4, once the terrain altitude state is transferred to a state higher than the track, it will lead to a collision, and these state transitions will be combined into the probability of transitioning to a collision state, that is, the probability of a ground collision accident. Therefore, the aircraft is in The probability of a collision state is the sum of the probabilities of all terrain altitude states above the aircraft altitude. That is, at time n, find all the states whose terrain height exceeds the trajectory of the aircraft from the state probability vector of the above terrain height, and sum their probabilities to obtain the probability of a ground collision accident at this moment. the
任一个地形高度状态,一旦超出飞机高度,将导致碰撞,即被标记为碰撞态,即飞机与地形发生了碰撞,其他地形高度状态则为非碰撞态。所有地形高度高于飞机高度的状态被统一标记为一个碰撞状态,该状态为吸收态,即地形高度一旦进入该状态,则该状态将始终保持为碰撞态,不再发生转移。 Any terrain height state, once exceeding the aircraft height, will cause a collision, that is, it is marked as a collision state, that is, the aircraft has collided with the terrain, and other terrain height states are non-collision states. All states where the terrain height is higher than the aircraft altitude are uniformly marked as a collision state, which is an absorbing state, that is, once the terrain height enters this state, the state will always remain in the collision state and no transfer will occur. the
D、近地告警系统的性能分析步骤 D. Performance analysis steps of the ground proximity warning system
成功告警和误解是近地告警系统的重要性能指标。若t时刻系统发出告警,而在一定时间范围内,飞机未发生撞地事故,则t时刻的告警为成功告警;若t时刻系统未发出告警,在一定时间范围内,飞机也未发生撞地事故,那么在t时刻若发出告警,则该告警为误警。 Successful warning and misinterpretation are important performance indicators of the ground proximity warning system. If the system issues an alarm at time t and the aircraft does not collide with the ground within a certain time range, then the alarm at time t is a successful alarm; if the system does not issue an alarm at time t, the plane does not collide with the ground within a certain time range accident, then if an alarm is issued at time t, the alarm is a false alarm. the
采用成功告警率P(SA)与误警率P(UA)对近地告警系统进行定量的性能评估,下面给出成功告警概率与误警率的定义: The successful alarm rate P(SA) and the false alarm rate P(UA) are used to quantitatively evaluate the performance of the ground proximity warning system. The definitions of the successful alarm probability and false alarm rate are given below:
a)成功告警率P(SA)=1-P(发出告警后,一定时间T范围内,飞机仍然发生撞地事故的概率) a) Successful alert rate P(SA)=1-P (after the alert is issued, within a certain time T range, the probability that the aircraft still has a ground collision accident)
b)误警率P(UA)=1-P(未发出告警,一定时间T范围内,飞机发生撞地事故的概率) b) False alarm rate P(UA)=1-P (the probability of an aircraft crashing into a terrain accident within a certain time T range without issuing an alarm)
该定义中的一项关键指标为时间范围T,其对应于最佳告警时间。最佳告警时间必须为飞行员反应延迟、飞机拉起机动等保留足够时间余量的安全时间。时间范围T越小,飞机面临危险的程度就越高,设置注意级和警告级的最佳告警时间分别为60秒和30秒,即60s内若飞机正常飞行且不撞地时,认定此时的告警为不必要的。 A key metric in this definition is the time horizon T, which corresponds to the optimal alarm time. The optimal warning time must be a safe time with sufficient time margin for pilot reaction delay, aircraft pull-up maneuver and so on. The smaller the time range T, the higher the degree of danger faced by the aircraft. The optimal alarm time for setting the attention level and the warning level are 60 seconds and 30 seconds respectively, that is, if the aircraft is flying normally and does not hit the ground within 60 seconds, it is determined that at this time warnings are unnecessary. the
给定初始时刻飞机的初始高度与速度,可以获得飞机的正常飞行航迹和逃逸飞行航迹,在此基础上,进行下述性能计算。 Given the initial altitude and speed of the aircraft at the initial moment, the normal flight path and escape flight path of the aircraft can be obtained, and on this basis, the following performance calculations are performed. the
a)给定初始时刻飞机处于各个高度状态的概率,根据飞机的正常飞行航迹以及系统的状态转移模型,可以获得在无告警情况下,t时刻飞机处于非碰撞态的概率,即在初始时刻飞机无需告警,该概率即为误警率。 a) Given the probability that the aircraft is in each altitude state at the initial time, according to the normal flight path of the aircraft and the state transition model of the system, the probability that the aircraft is in a non-collision state at time t without warning can be obtained, that is, at the initial time The aircraft does not need to alert, and this probability is the false alarm rate. the
b)给定初始时刻飞机处于各个高度状态的概率,根据飞机的逃逸飞行航迹以及系统的状态转移模型,可以获得在有告警情况下,t时刻飞机处于非碰撞态的概率,即系统成功告警的概率。 b) Given the probability that the aircraft is in each altitude state at the initial moment, according to the escape flight path of the aircraft and the state transition model of the system, the probability that the aircraft is in a non-collision state at time t under the condition of an alarm can be obtained, that is, the system successfully alarms The probability. the
E、近地告警系统的阈值和包线设计步骤 E. Threshold value and envelope design steps of the ground proximity warning system
给定飞机的初始位置,通过改变初始速度的仿真条件,可以获得不同初始速度条件下系统的成功告警率和误警率,得到图5和图6中所示的告警系统性能曲线,即成功告警率与误警率的关系曲线,以及成功告警率、误警率与初始速度的关系曲线。 Given the initial position of the aircraft, by changing the simulation conditions of the initial speed, the successful alarm rate and false alarm rate of the system under different initial speed conditions can be obtained, and the performance curves of the alarm system shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6 are obtained, that is, the successful alarm rate The relationship curve between rate and false alarm rate, and the relationship curve between successful alarm rate, false alarm rate and initial speed. the
为了使近地告警性能最高,则需要系统成功告警概率高,误警率低,即获得告警的最佳收益,如图5的理想值点和图6中的最佳收益线所示,即选择的告警阈值满足以下条件: In order to achieve the highest ground proximity warning performance, it is necessary for the system to have a high probability of successful warning and a low false alarm rate, that is, to obtain the best benefit of the warning. The alarm threshold meets the following conditions:
P(SA)-P(UA)=(P(SA)-P(UA))max (12) P(SA)-P(UA)=(P(SA)-P(UA)) max (12)
在告警性能的最佳收益处,可以获得此时对应的系统初始条件速度(初始高度与速度),即当飞机在该初始位置时,若速度达到该速度限制条件时,系统发出告警,最终将获得最佳的告警性能,即获得了一个最佳告警阈值(v1,h1)。 At the point where the warning performance is optimal, the corresponding system initial condition speed (initial altitude and speed) can be obtained at this time, that is, when the aircraft is at the initial position, if the speed reaches the speed limit condition, the system will issue an alarm, and eventually the The best alarm performance is obtained, that is, an optimal alarm threshold (v 1 , h 1 ) is obtained.
改变初始条件设置,可重复上述仿真,获得一系列最佳告警阈值(v2,h2)、(v3,h3)、…、(vn,hn),这一组告警阈值点可构成了告警系统的最佳告警包络线。 By changing the initial condition settings, the above simulation can be repeated to obtain a series of optimal alarm thresholds (v 2 , h 2 ), (v 3 , h 3 ), ..., (v n , h n ), and this group of alarm threshold points can be It constitutes the best alarm envelope of the alarm system.
Claims (4)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201210574540.1A CN103903481B (en) | 2012-12-26 | 2012-12-26 | The threshold value and envelope curve design method of a kind of ground proximity warning system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201210574540.1A CN103903481B (en) | 2012-12-26 | 2012-12-26 | The threshold value and envelope curve design method of a kind of ground proximity warning system |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN103903481A true CN103903481A (en) | 2014-07-02 |
CN103903481B CN103903481B (en) | 2018-01-16 |
Family
ID=50994782
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201210574540.1A Expired - Fee Related CN103903481B (en) | 2012-12-26 | 2012-12-26 | The threshold value and envelope curve design method of a kind of ground proximity warning system |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN103903481B (en) |
Cited By (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105404307A (en) * | 2014-09-08 | 2016-03-16 | 空中客车运营简化股份公司 | Method And Device For Automatic Protection Of An Aircraft Against A Risk Of Collision With The Ground |
CN105528915A (en) * | 2015-12-02 | 2016-04-27 | 上海航空电器有限公司 | Helicopter fore-sight prediction false alarm inhibition method based on condition triggering |
CN106373350A (en) * | 2016-08-19 | 2017-02-01 | 北京协同创新智能电网技术有限公司 | Designing method and system for single variable alarm system's alarm line |
CN106650172A (en) * | 2017-01-05 | 2017-05-10 | 电子科技大学 | MDP (Markov decision process) based airborne collision avoidance system logical unit design method |
CN108922251A (en) * | 2018-08-02 | 2018-11-30 | 四川九洲空管科技有限责任公司 | A kind of TCASII airborne collision avoidance system flying platform flying quality limitation processing method and system |
CN109545000A (en) * | 2018-11-09 | 2019-03-29 | 中国航空无线电电子研究所 | Forward sight landform alerts boundary calculation method |
CN109841094A (en) * | 2017-11-28 | 2019-06-04 | 上海航空电器有限公司 | A kind of forward sight alarm envelope curve modulator approach considering RNP and flight plan information |
CN109903591A (en) * | 2017-12-11 | 2019-06-18 | 上海航空电器有限公司 | A kind of automatic near-earth collision assessment method and system of aircraft based on Expert Rules |
CN109903592A (en) * | 2017-12-11 | 2019-06-18 | 上海航空电器有限公司 | A kind of automatic near-earth anti-collision system topographical scan method of high-precision aircraft based on error theory |
CN109903590A (en) * | 2017-12-11 | 2019-06-18 | 上海航空电器有限公司 | A kind of aircraft automatic maneuver bypassing method based on landform envelope curve |
CN109979247A (en) * | 2019-04-18 | 2019-07-05 | 西安希德雷达科技有限公司 | A kind of Distal promoter method based on In-Flight Performance |
CN110462708A (en) * | 2017-03-27 | 2019-11-15 | 湾流航空航天公司 | Aircraft envelope protection and recovery automatic pilot |
CN110503855A (en) * | 2019-07-02 | 2019-11-26 | 中国航空工业集团公司雷华电子技术研究所 | A kind of alarm performance appraisal procedure and platform for helicopter-carried land form warning system |
CN111373462A (en) * | 2017-08-11 | 2020-07-03 | 联想(北京)有限公司 | Transmitting aircraft position information |
CN112633644A (en) * | 2020-12-07 | 2021-04-09 | 中国人民解放军93209部队 | Safety risk calculation method and device for heterogeneous aircraft to pass through air route |
CN113792382A (en) * | 2021-09-10 | 2021-12-14 | 中国航空工业集团公司西安飞行自动控制研究所 | Multi-task mode ground proximity warning method based on machine learning |
CN114115312A (en) * | 2021-11-25 | 2022-03-01 | 北京航空航天大学 | A real-time airborne automatic collision avoidance warning and decision-making method and system for avoidance |
CN115440093A (en) * | 2022-07-15 | 2022-12-06 | 太原航空仪表有限公司 | Calculation method of limit warning curve based on terrain following model |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020113719A1 (en) * | 1995-07-31 | 2002-08-22 | Muller Hans R. | Terrain data retrieval system |
CN101057270A (en) * | 2004-11-15 | 2007-10-17 | 法国空中巴士公司 | Aircraft terrain avoidance and alarm method and device |
CN101527089A (en) * | 2009-04-01 | 2009-09-09 | 四川九洲电器集团有限责任公司 | Topographic data based ground proximity method and system thereof |
CN102737525A (en) * | 2012-06-28 | 2012-10-17 | 上海交通大学 | Method for generating warning envelope curve of helicopter terrain awareness and warning system |
-
2012
- 2012-12-26 CN CN201210574540.1A patent/CN103903481B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020113719A1 (en) * | 1995-07-31 | 2002-08-22 | Muller Hans R. | Terrain data retrieval system |
CN101057270A (en) * | 2004-11-15 | 2007-10-17 | 法国空中巴士公司 | Aircraft terrain avoidance and alarm method and device |
CN101527089A (en) * | 2009-04-01 | 2009-09-09 | 四川九洲电器集团有限责任公司 | Topographic data based ground proximity method and system thereof |
CN102737525A (en) * | 2012-06-28 | 2012-10-17 | 上海交通大学 | Method for generating warning envelope curve of helicopter terrain awareness and warning system |
Cited By (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105404307A (en) * | 2014-09-08 | 2016-03-16 | 空中客车运营简化股份公司 | Method And Device For Automatic Protection Of An Aircraft Against A Risk Of Collision With The Ground |
CN105404307B (en) * | 2014-09-08 | 2020-04-14 | 空中客车运营简化股份公司 | Method and device for automatically protecting an aircraft against the risk of collision with the ground |
CN105528915A (en) * | 2015-12-02 | 2016-04-27 | 上海航空电器有限公司 | Helicopter fore-sight prediction false alarm inhibition method based on condition triggering |
CN105528915B (en) * | 2015-12-02 | 2020-11-20 | 上海航空电器有限公司 | A Condition-triggered Helicopter Forward Looking Prediction False Alarm Suppression Method |
CN106373350A (en) * | 2016-08-19 | 2017-02-01 | 北京协同创新智能电网技术有限公司 | Designing method and system for single variable alarm system's alarm line |
CN106650172A (en) * | 2017-01-05 | 2017-05-10 | 电子科技大学 | MDP (Markov decision process) based airborne collision avoidance system logical unit design method |
CN110462708A (en) * | 2017-03-27 | 2019-11-15 | 湾流航空航天公司 | Aircraft envelope protection and recovery automatic pilot |
CN111373462A (en) * | 2017-08-11 | 2020-07-03 | 联想(北京)有限公司 | Transmitting aircraft position information |
CN109841094A (en) * | 2017-11-28 | 2019-06-04 | 上海航空电器有限公司 | A kind of forward sight alarm envelope curve modulator approach considering RNP and flight plan information |
CN109903590A (en) * | 2017-12-11 | 2019-06-18 | 上海航空电器有限公司 | A kind of aircraft automatic maneuver bypassing method based on landform envelope curve |
CN109903590B (en) * | 2017-12-11 | 2023-04-07 | 上海航空电器有限公司 | Terrain envelope-based aircraft automatic maneuver evasion method |
CN109903592A (en) * | 2017-12-11 | 2019-06-18 | 上海航空电器有限公司 | A kind of automatic near-earth anti-collision system topographical scan method of high-precision aircraft based on error theory |
CN109903591A (en) * | 2017-12-11 | 2019-06-18 | 上海航空电器有限公司 | A kind of automatic near-earth collision assessment method and system of aircraft based on Expert Rules |
CN108922251B (en) * | 2018-08-02 | 2020-09-08 | 四川九洲空管科技有限责任公司 | Method for limiting flight performance of flight platform of TCASII airborne collision avoidance system |
CN108922251A (en) * | 2018-08-02 | 2018-11-30 | 四川九洲空管科技有限责任公司 | A kind of TCASII airborne collision avoidance system flying platform flying quality limitation processing method and system |
CN109545000A (en) * | 2018-11-09 | 2019-03-29 | 中国航空无线电电子研究所 | Forward sight landform alerts boundary calculation method |
CN109979247A (en) * | 2019-04-18 | 2019-07-05 | 西安希德雷达科技有限公司 | A kind of Distal promoter method based on In-Flight Performance |
CN110503855A (en) * | 2019-07-02 | 2019-11-26 | 中国航空工业集团公司雷华电子技术研究所 | A kind of alarm performance appraisal procedure and platform for helicopter-carried land form warning system |
CN112633644A (en) * | 2020-12-07 | 2021-04-09 | 中国人民解放军93209部队 | Safety risk calculation method and device for heterogeneous aircraft to pass through air route |
CN113792382A (en) * | 2021-09-10 | 2021-12-14 | 中国航空工业集团公司西安飞行自动控制研究所 | Multi-task mode ground proximity warning method based on machine learning |
CN114115312A (en) * | 2021-11-25 | 2022-03-01 | 北京航空航天大学 | A real-time airborne automatic collision avoidance warning and decision-making method and system for avoidance |
CN114115312B (en) * | 2021-11-25 | 2023-11-10 | 北京航空航天大学 | Real-time airborne automatic ground-collision-prevention alarming and avoidance decision-making method and system |
CN115440093A (en) * | 2022-07-15 | 2022-12-06 | 太原航空仪表有限公司 | Calculation method of limit warning curve based on terrain following model |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN103903481B (en) | 2018-01-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN103903481B (en) | The threshold value and envelope curve design method of a kind of ground proximity warning system | |
CN103354041B (en) | A kind of civil aircraft terrain perception and warning system pattern four alarm envelope curve generation method | |
CN102737525B (en) | Method for generating warning envelope curve of helicopter terrain awareness and warning system | |
CN104239741B (en) | Based on the automobile driving safe householder method of driving risk field | |
CN112885155B (en) | A method for assessing the risk of UAV flight collision in a fusion airspace | |
CN108387885B (en) | Inversion method of aircraft wake characteristic parameters under clear sky conditions based on lidar detection | |
CN108759839B (en) | A Situational Space-Based UAV Path Planning Method | |
CN105620480B (en) | Intelligent vehicle independence lane-change opportunity decision-making technique | |
CN102854883B (en) | Modeling method for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) dynamic emergency collision avoidance area | |
CN113359834B (en) | A method, system and monitoring platform for drone operation monitoring | |
CN106997693A (en) | A kind of aircraft anticollision proof of algorithm method of testing and system | |
CN107677275B (en) | A kind of heterogeneous aircraft paths planning method in mixing spatial domain and device | |
CN105518763B (en) | Aircraft navigation information generation device and aircraft navigation information generating method | |
CN105023468A (en) | Terminal area airline safety tolerance monitoring method based on collision risk model and system thereof | |
CN110223539A (en) | Early warning range real time acquiring method suitable for low latitude unmanned plane | |
CN106056979B (en) | A kind of anticollision alarm method suitable for helicopter | |
CN106530840A (en) | Flight into terrain threat avoidance method based on real-time performance of aircraft | |
CN109903590B (en) | Terrain envelope-based aircraft automatic maneuver evasion method | |
CN104793201A (en) | Modified variable-structure grid interaction multi-model filtering method for tracking hypersonic-speed target of near space | |
CN105548970A (en) | Flying bird detection radar processor | |
CN109542115A (en) | A kind of multiple-uav formation flight avoidance obstacle policy development method | |
CN102929284A (en) | Aircraft islet landing wave-off decision method | |
CN105303052A (en) | Low-speed approaching spacecraft track safety assessment method | |
CN109979247A (en) | A kind of Distal promoter method based on In-Flight Performance | |
CN103954949A (en) | Multi-model oval Hough transformation accumulation detection method for invisible ski-jump maneuvering target |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20180116 |
|
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |