CN103745117A - Decision probability transformation method for target identification - Google Patents

Decision probability transformation method for target identification Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN103745117A
CN103745117A CN201410029323.3A CN201410029323A CN103745117A CN 103745117 A CN103745117 A CN 103745117A CN 201410029323 A CN201410029323 A CN 201410029323A CN 103745117 A CN103745117 A CN 103745117A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
identification
target
decision
decision probability
cup
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201410029323.3A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN103745117B (en
Inventor
赵玉新
贾韧锋
杜雪
刘厂
宋凯
吴迪
常帅
李旺
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Harbin Engineering University
Original Assignee
Harbin Engineering University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Harbin Engineering University filed Critical Harbin Engineering University
Priority to CN201410029323.3A priority Critical patent/CN103745117B/en
Publication of CN103745117A publication Critical patent/CN103745117A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN103745117B publication Critical patent/CN103745117B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

The invention belongs to the information processing technology field, and specifically relates to a decision probability transformation method for target identification. The decision probability transformation method includes the steps of determining an identification framework and obtaining the basic probability assignment of the identification targets under the framework, calculating the decision probability P1(Xi), i=1,2,..., n, of each identification target, calculating the decision probability P2(Xj), j=1,2,..., n, of each identification target, and fusing P1(Xi) and P2(Xj) according to a D-S evidence fusion rule to obtain the final decision probability P(Xp) of each identification target Xp. The decision probability transformation method is capable of distributing uncertain information by virtue of the reliability ratio and the likelihood ratio of a single-target proposition in a multi-target proposition; the distribution basis is quite objective; the uncertain information can be distributed rationally. The decision probabilities calculated based on the reliability ratio and the likelihood ratio are fused according to the D-S evidence fusion rule, so that the transformation attitude is neither optimistic or conservative, and the obtained result is more rational and effectively. The decision probability transformation method does not involve with complex high-order operation, and is low in calculation amount and convenient to operate.

Description

A kind of decision probability conversion method for target identification
Technical field
The invention belongs to technical field of information processing, be specifically related to a kind of decision probability conversion method for target identification.
Background technology
In high-tech war, enemy is attacked to effective detection and the early warning of target, to the high-resolution reconnaissance and surveillance of Research on Target, all require armament systems to identify round-the-clock, at a distance, rapidly and accurately target, for decision system provides strong decision support.Target identification technology has huge application value in army in modern war, has become the important support technology of current intellectual weapon system, and deep research is all carried out at a large amount of talent and the funds of input in countries in the world.The main method of target identification is to utilize the prospecting tools such as radar sensor, infrared sensor to survey identified region, by detecting target signature, obtain identifying some basic probability assignments (Basic Probability Assignment of target, BPA), then according to BPA, differentiate target, for aid decision making.But often sensor can not accurately be identified the target of feature similarity, this will obtain some BPA that contain multiple target propositions.So, in order can reasonably to make a policy, the BPA in multiple goal proposition need to be distributed to single goal proposition, to obtain suitable decision probability.Therefore, need to carry out decision probability conversion to BPA.
At present, BPA being carried out in the method for decision probability conversion, some methods are that the BPA in multiple goal proposition is all assigned in single goal proposition, easily cause information loss, are unfavorable for decision-making.Some methods have only been considered the impact of likelihood function on transfer process, and do not consider the impact of belief function, and this is incomplete.Some methods can be selected suitable conversion method according to different conversion attitudes, and the scope of application is wider, and the selection of still changing attitude lacks objective basis.
Summary of the invention
The decision probability conversion method for target identification that the object of the present invention is to provide a kind of decision maker of making to make a policy more rationally, accurately and rapidly.
The object of the present invention is achieved like this:
(1) determine identification framework, obtain the basic probability assignment of identifying target under framework;
By the definite identification framework Θ={ X of radar sensor 1, X 2..., X n, X 1, X 2..., X nfor the identification target that radar sensor observes, under identification framework, there is k basic probability assignment m 1(), m 2() ..., m k(): 2 Θ→ [0,1], and meet Σ i = 1 k m i ( · ) = 1 ;
(2) calculate each identification target X idecision probability P 1(X i), i=1,2 ..., n:
P 1 ( X i ) = m ( X i ) + Σ Y ∈ 2 Θ , | Y | > 1 , X i ⊆ Y , | X i | = 1 Bel ( X i ) ΣBel ( X i ) m ( Y )
Wherein, m (X i) be identification target X ibasic probability assignment; Bel (X i) be identification target X ireliability; Y is the proposition that contains multiple identification targets, and m (Y) is the basic probability assignment that contains the proposition of multiple identification target;
(3) calculate each identification target X jdecision probability P 2(X j), j=1,2 ..., n:
P 2 ( X j ) = m ( X j ) + Σ Y ∈ 2 Θ , | Y | > 1 , X i ⊆ Y , | X i | = 1 Pl ′ ( X j ) Σ Pl ′ ( X j ) m ( Y )
Wherein, m (X j) be identification target X jbasic probability assignment; Bel (X j) be identification target X jreliability; Y is the proposition that contains multiple identification targets, and m (Y) is the basic probability assignment that contains the proposition of multiple identification target; Pl'(X j) be identification target X jonly the likelihood score in Y, establishes Θ={ X 1, X 2, X 3, m (Y)=m (X 1∪ X 2), X j=X 1,
Pl'(X 1)=m(X 1)+m(X 1∪X 2);
(4) according to D-S evidence fusion rule to P 1(X i) and P 2(X j) merge, draw each identification target X pfinal decision probability P (X p), p=1,2 ..., n:
Figure BDA0000460294390000022
P ( X p ) = Σ X i ∩ X j = X p P 1 ( X i ) P 2 ( X j ) 1 - K
Wherein, K is P 1(X i) and P 2(X j) between conflict coefficient.
Beneficial effect of the present invention is:
1. the present invention utilizes reliability ratio and the likelihood score ratio of single goal proposition in multiple goal proposition to distribute uncertain information, distributes according to more objective, can reasonably distribute uncertain information.
By D-S evidence fusion rule to based on reliability than and likelihood score than the decision probability calculating, merge, make to change attitude both pessimistic also conservative, the result obtaining is more reasonable effective.
3. the present invention does not relate to complicated high exponent arithmetic(al), and calculated amount is little, convenient operation.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is calculation flow chart of the present invention.
Embodiment
Below in conjunction with accompanying drawing, the present invention is described further.
For above-mentioned existing methodical deficiency, a kind of decision probability conversion method for target identification has been proposed.Because the reliability of proposition is the support that proposition is be sure of, the likelihood score of proposition is to the potential support of the maximum of proposition, so the present invention utilizes the reliability of proposition and the feature of likelihood score, proposed respectively based on reliability than and likelihood score than the method for switch decision probability.Consider based on reliability than the method for switch decision probability, attitude during conversion is too optimistic, easily increases risk of policy making; Based on likelihood score, than the method for switch decision probability, attitude during conversion is too conservative again, is unfavorable for decision-making.So, in order to bring into play better the advantage of the two, make up the deficiency of the two, by D-S evidence fusion rule, the two is merged, draw final decision probability, make transformation result more rationally effectively.The method can reasonably be distributed uncertain information, reduces uncertainty, reduces risk of policy making, is convenient to decision maker rationally, make a policy accurately and rapidly.
The technical solution adopted in the present invention is a kind of decision probability conversion method for target identification, and the method comprises the following steps:
(1) determine identification framework, obtain the basic probability assignment of identifying target under framework.Suppose the identification framework Θ={ X definite by radar sensor 1, X 2..., X n, X 1, X 2..., X nfor the identification target that radar sensor observes, under this framework, there is k basic probability assignment m 1(), m 2() ..., m k(): 2 Θ→ [0,1], and meet
(2) basis, based on reliability than the method for switch decision probability, calculates each identification target X idecision probability P 1(X i), i=1,2 ..., n, computing formula is as follows:
P 1 ( X i ) = m ( X i ) + Σ Y ∈ 2 Θ , | Y | > 1 , X i ⊆ Y , | X i | = 1 Bel ( X i ) ΣBel ( X i ) m ( Y ) - - - ( 1 )
Wherein, m (X i) be identification target X ibasic probability assignment; Bel (X i) be identification target X ireliability; Y is the proposition that contains multiple identification targets, and m (Y) is the basic probability assignment that contains the proposition of multiple identification target.
(3) basis, based on likelihood score than the method for switch decision probability, calculates each identification target X jdecision probability P 2(X j), j=1,2 ..., n, computing formula is as follows:
P 2 ( X j ) = m ( X j ) + Σ Y ∈ 2 Θ , | Y | > 1 , X i ⊆ Y , | X i | = 1 Pl ′ ( X j ) Σ Pl ′ ( X j ) m ( Y ) - - - ( 2 )
Wherein, m (X j) be identification target X jbasic probability assignment; Bel (X j) be identification target X jreliability; Y is the proposition that contains multiple identification targets, and m (Y) is the basic probability assignment that contains the proposition of multiple identification target; Pl'(X j) be identification target X jonly the likelihood score in Y, for example, suppose Θ={ X 1, X 2, X 3, m (Y)=m (X 1∪ X 2), X j=X 1, Pl'(X 1)=m (X 1)+m (X 1∪ X 2).
(4) according to D-S evidence fusion rule to P 1(X i) and P 2(X j) merge, draw each identification target X pfinal decision probability P (X p), p=1,2 ..., n, computing formula is as follows:
P ( X p ) = Σ X i ∩ X j = X p P 1 ( X i ) P 2 ( X j ) 1 - K - - - ( 4 )
Wherein, K is P 1(X i) and P 2(X j) between conflict coefficient.
Below by a concrete example, the present invention is described in detail.
(1) determine identification framework, obtain the basic probability assignment of identifying target under framework.Suppose an existing radar sensor, with it, observe aerial airbound target, the target that may observe has F-15, Mig-27 and Boeing-747, identification framework Θ={ F, M, B}, wherein F, M, B, represents respectively F-15, Mig-27 and Boeing-747, and the basic probability assignment of identifying target under this framework is as shown in table 1.
Table 1 basic probability assignment
Subsets {F} {M} {B} {F∪M} {F∪M∪B}
m(·) 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1
(2) basis, based on reliability than the method for switch decision probability, calculates each identification target X idecision probability P 1(X i), i=1,2,3, computing formula is as follows:
P 1 ( X i ) = m ( X i ) + Σ Y ∈ 2 Θ , | Y | > 1 , X i ⊆ Y , | X i | = 1 Bel ( X i ) ΣBel ( X i ) m ( Y ) - - - ( 1 )
Wherein, m (X i) be identification target X ibasic probability assignment; Bel (X i) be identification target X ireliability; Y is the proposition that contains multiple identification targets, and m (Y) is the basic probability assignment that contains the proposition of multiple identification target.
According to formula (1), calculate respectively the decision probability of F, M and B:
P 1 ( F ) = m ( F ) + m ( F ) m ( F ) + m ( M ) m ( F ∪ M ) + m ( F ) m ( F ) + m ( M ) + m ( B ) m ( F ∪ M ∪ B ) = 0.4 + 0.4 * 0.2 / 0.6 + 0.4 * 0.1 / 0.7 = 0.5905
P 1 ( M ) = m ( M ) + m ( M ) m ( F ) + m ( M ) m ( F ∪ M ) + m ( M ) m ( F ) + m ( M ) + m ( B ) m ( F ∪ M ∪ B ) = 0.2 + 0.2 * 0.2 / 0.6 + 0.2 * 0.1 / 0.7 = 0.2952
P 1 ( B ) = m ( B ) + m ( B ) m ( F ) + m ( M ) + m ( B ) m ( F ∪ M ∪ B ) = 0.1 + 0.1 * 0.1 / 0.7 0.1143
(3) basis, based on likelihood score than the method for switch decision probability, calculates each identification target X jdecision probability P 2(X j), j=1,2,3, computing formula is as follows:
P 2 ( X j ) = m ( X j ) + Σ Y ∈ 2 Θ , | Y | > 1 , X i ⊆ Y , | X i | = 1 Pl ′ ( X j ) Σ Pl ′ ( X j ) m ( Y ) - - - ( 2 )
Wherein, m (X j) be identification target X jbasic probability assignment; Bel (X j) be identification target X jreliability; Y is the proposition that contains multiple identification targets, and m (Y) is the basic probability assignment that contains the proposition of multiple identification target; Pl'(X j) be identification target X jthe only likelihood score in Y, for example in this embodiment, as m (Y)=m (X 1∪ X 2), X j=X 1time,
Pl'(X 1)=m(X 1)+m(X 1∪X 2)。
According to formula (2), calculate respectively the decision probability of F, M and B:
P 2 ( F ) = m ( F ) + m ( F ) + m ( F ∪ M ) m ( F ) + m ( F ∪ M ) + m ( M ) + m ( F ∪ M ) m ( F ∪ M ) + m ( F ) + m ( F ∪ M ) + m ( F ∪ M ∪ B ) m ( F ) + m ( F ∪ M ) + m ( F ∪ M ∪ B ) + m ( M ) + m ( F ∪ M ) + m ( F ∪ M ∪ B ) + m ( B ) + m ( F ∪ M ∪ B ) m ( F ∪ M ∪ B ) = 0 . 4 + 0 . 6 * 0.2 / 1 + 0 . 7 * 0.1 / 1.4 = 0.5700
P 2 ( M ) = m ( M ) + m ( M ) + m ( F ∪ M ) m ( F ) + m ( F ∪ M ) + m ( M ) + m ( F ∪ M ) m ( F ∪ M ) + m ( M ) + m ( F ∪ M ) + m ( F ∪ M ∪ B ) m ( F ) + m ( F ∪ M ) + m ( F ∪ M ∪ B ) + m ( M ) + m ( F ∪ M ) + m ( F ∪ M ∪ B ) + m ( B ) + m ( F ∪ M ∪ B ) m ( F ∪ M ∪ B ) = 0.2 + 0.4 * 0.2 / 1 + 0.5 * 0.1 / 1.4 = 0.3157
P 2 ( B ) = m ( B ) + m ( B ) + m ( F ∪ M ∪ B ) m ( F ) + m ( F ∪ M ) + m ( F ∪ M ∪ B ) + m ( M ) + m ( F ∪ M ) + m ( F ∪ M ∪ B ) + m ( B ) + m ( F ∪ M ∪ B ) m ( F ∪ M ∪ B ) = 0.1 + 0.2 * 0.1 / 1.4 = 0.1143
(4) according to D-S evidence fusion rule to P 1(X i) and P 2(X j) merge, draw each identification target X pfinal decision probability P (X p), p=1,2,3, computing formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0000460294390000056
Wherein, K is P 1(X i) and P 2(X j) between conflict coefficient.
P ( X p ) = Σ X i ∩ X j = X p P 1 ( X i ) P 2 ( X j ) 1 - K - - - ( 4 )
According to formula (3), calculate P 1(X i) and P 2(X j) between conflict coefficient K:
K=0.5905*(0.3157+0.1143)+0.2952*(0.57+0.1143)+0.1143*(0.57+0.3157)
=0.5572
According to formula (4) respectively to P 1and P (F) 2(F), P 1and P (M) 2(M), P 1and P (B) 2(B) merge, draw the final decision probability of F, M, B:
P(F)=0.5905*0.57/(1-0.5572)
=0.7601
P(M)=0.2952*0.3157/(1-0.5572)
=0.2105
P(B)=0.1143*0.1143/(1-0.5572)
=0.0295
From fusion results, can find out, the target that radar sensor is more supported is F-15.

Claims (1)

1. for a decision probability conversion method for target identification, it is characterized in that, comprise the following steps:
(1) determine identification framework, obtain the basic probability assignment of identifying target under framework;
By the definite identification framework Θ={ X of radar sensor 1, X 2..., X n, X 1, X 2..., X nfor the identification target that radar sensor observes, under identification framework, there is k basic probability assignment m 1(), m 2() ..., m k(): 2 Θ→ [0,1], and meet Σ i = 1 k m i ( · ) = 1 ;
(2) calculate each identification target X idecision probability P 1(X i), i=1,2 ..., n:
P 1 ( X i ) = m ( X i ) + Σ Y ∈ 2 Θ , | Y | > 1 , X i ⊆ Y , | X i | = 1 Bel ( X i ) ΣBel ( X i ) m ( Y )
Wherein, m (X i) be identification target X ibasic probability assignment; Bel (X i) be identification target X ireliability; Y is the proposition that contains multiple identification targets, and m (Y) is the basic probability assignment that contains the proposition of multiple identification target;
(3) calculate each identification target X jdecision probability P 2(X j), j=1,2 ..., n:
P 2 ( X j ) = m ( X j ) + Σ Y ∈ 2 Θ , | Y | > 1 , X i ⊆ Y , | X i | = 1 Pl ′ ( X j ) Σ Pl ′ ( X j ) m ( Y )
Wherein, m (X j) be identification target X jbasic probability assignment; Bel (X j) be identification target X jreliability; Y is the proposition that contains multiple identification targets, and m (Y) is the basic probability assignment that contains the proposition of multiple identification target; Pl'(X j) be identification target X jonly the likelihood score in Y, establishes Θ={ X 1, X 2, X 3, m (Y)=m (X 1∪ X 2), X j=X 1,
Pl'(X 1)=m(X 1)+m(X 1∪X 2);
(4) according to D-S evidence fusion rule to P 1(X i) and P 2(X j) merge, draw each identification target X pfinal decision probability P (X p), p=1,2 ..., n:
Figure FDA0000460294380000014
P ( X p ) = Σ X i ∩ X j = X p P 1 ( X i ) P 2 ( X j ) 1 - K
Wherein, K is P 1(X i) and P 2(X j) between conflict coefficient.
CN201410029323.3A 2014-01-22 2014-01-22 Decision probability transformation method for target identification Active CN103745117B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201410029323.3A CN103745117B (en) 2014-01-22 2014-01-22 Decision probability transformation method for target identification

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201410029323.3A CN103745117B (en) 2014-01-22 2014-01-22 Decision probability transformation method for target identification

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN103745117A true CN103745117A (en) 2014-04-23
CN103745117B CN103745117B (en) 2017-01-18

Family

ID=50502134

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201410029323.3A Active CN103745117B (en) 2014-01-22 2014-01-22 Decision probability transformation method for target identification

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN103745117B (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104134004A (en) * 2014-07-31 2014-11-05 哈尔滨工程大学 Marine environment safety assessment method based on D-S evidence theory
CN109325583A (en) * 2017-07-31 2019-02-12 财团法人工业技术研究院 Deep neural network, method and readable media using deep neural network
CN111723341A (en) * 2020-06-15 2020-09-29 中国船舶重工集团公司第七0三研究所 Multi-subset probability processing method for boiler fault diagnosis

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
DANIEL M.: "On Probabilistic Transformations of Belief Functions", 《SYMBOLIC AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO REASONING WITH UNCERTAINTY》 *
李楠 等: "基于证据组合理论的多传感器目标识别算法", 《导箭与制导学报》 *
王万请 等: "基于不确定度的基本概率赋值概率转换方法", 《控制与决策》 *
蒋雯 等: "D-S证据理论中的基本概率赋值转换概率方法研究", 《西北工业大学学报》 *

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104134004A (en) * 2014-07-31 2014-11-05 哈尔滨工程大学 Marine environment safety assessment method based on D-S evidence theory
CN104134004B (en) * 2014-07-31 2017-10-27 哈尔滨工程大学 A kind of Marine Environmental Security appraisal procedure based on D S evidence theories
CN109325583A (en) * 2017-07-31 2019-02-12 财团法人工业技术研究院 Deep neural network, method and readable media using deep neural network
CN109325583B (en) * 2017-07-31 2022-03-08 财团法人工业技术研究院 Deep neural network structure, method using deep neural network, and readable medium
CN111723341A (en) * 2020-06-15 2020-09-29 中国船舶重工集团公司第七0三研究所 Multi-subset probability processing method for boiler fault diagnosis

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN103745117B (en) 2017-01-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2881755B1 (en) Unmanned aircraft systems sense and avoid sensor fusion track initialization
CN105116392B (en) One kind is for AIS and Active Radar Track Fusion and knowledge method for distinguishing
CN104408324B (en) Multiple sensor information amalgamation method based on D S evidence theories
CN104077601A (en) Method for carrying out synthetic target recognition through information of different types
CN108759839B (en) Unmanned aerial vehicle path planning method based on situation space
CN103488886A (en) State threat assessment method based on fuzzy dynamic Bayesian network
CN111079859B (en) Passive multi-station multi-target direction finding cross positioning and false point removing method
CN104021292B (en) Dim target detection and tracking method based on formation active networking
CN109960148B (en) Autonomy evaluation method and system for intelligent unmanned system
CN104318059A (en) Target tracking method applied to nonlinear gauss system and tracking system
CN110673090B (en) Passive multi-station multi-target positioning method based on DBSCAN
CN104732224B (en) SAR target identification methods based on two-dimentional Zelnick moment characteristics rarefaction representation
CN103745117A (en) Decision probability transformation method for target identification
CN104091078B (en) Product Multi-information acquisition indicating failure means to save the situation based on D S evidence theories
CN108490409A (en) The automatic initial mode of three-dimensional radar based on flight path risk assessment
CN104268553A (en) SAR image target recognition method based on kernel fuzzy Foley-Sammon transformation
CN104008403A (en) Multi-target identification and judgment method based on SVM mode
CN114676743B (en) Low-speed small target track threat identification method based on hidden Markov model
CN101907461A (en) Measuration data correlation method for passive multisensor based on angle cotangent value
CN110008985A (en) Based on the shipboard aircraft group target identification method for improving D-S evidence theory rule
CN107273914B (en) Efficient fusion identification method based on information source self-adaptive dynamic selection
CN103955622A (en) System and method for identifying targets by airborne multiple sensors
Ximeng et al. Threat assessment in air combat based on ELM neural network
CN109977763B (en) Aerial small target identification method based on improved evidence trust
Yang et al. Path planning for unmanned aerial vehicle passive detection under the framework of partially observable markov decision process

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
C14 Grant of patent or utility model
GR01 Patent grant