CN103743671A - Bonding strength checking method for vehicle adhesive - Google Patents
Bonding strength checking method for vehicle adhesive Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN103743671A CN103743671A CN201410014454.4A CN201410014454A CN103743671A CN 103743671 A CN103743671 A CN 103743671A CN 201410014454 A CN201410014454 A CN 201410014454A CN 103743671 A CN103743671 A CN 103743671A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- glue
- stress
- bonding
- line unit
- prime
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Adhesives Or Adhesive Processes (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a bonding strength checking method for a vehicle adhesive. The method comprises the following steps: calculating the complete stress of an adhesive layer unit on a bonding plane according to a formula shown in the specification, calculating the limit stress of the adhesive layer unit according to a formula shown in the specification, and calculating according to the formula that 1-R=1-p'/p'' to judge the safety. The method can be used for checking bonding strength of a vehicle bonding structure under any complex working conditions. When the working conditions of the bonding structure are determined, the safety of the bonding structure can be judged according to the checking method disclosed by the invention, and moreover, the bonding structure can reach a safe and reliable state in the ways of adjusting the bonding structure form, the bonding area, the gluing amount and the like.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of bonding agent bonding strength and check field, more specifically, relate to a kind of bonding strength check method that is applied to the automobile-used bonding agent in the fields such as EMU, passenger train, highway passenger vehicle.
Background technology
Adhesive technology is a kind of Material Joining Technology conventional in engineering, adopt adhesive technology to be linked and packed, to have that outward appearance is neat, join domain load distributes (comparing with riveted joint with bolt) relative evenly, suitable material extensively and can realize the plurality of advantages such as foreign material connection.
In recent years, increasing along with industry member new material application, the application of adhesive technology is also more and more extensive.In Vehicle Industry, most bonding way that adopt such as the assembling of body structure and interior material, sound insulating material, heat-barrier material, windscreen and vehicle window.
Chinese Patent Application No. 201110183157.9 discloses a kind of resin bonding strength detecting method.By utilizing this scheme, can improve the detection accuracy of brittle resin bonding strength, therefore, the bonding strength of the characteristic resin that is applicable to enbrittle detects.But, exist operating process complicated, application is not extensively and detect the problems such as defect that exist.
Although adhesive technology has many advantages, but from current research situation, also there is following problem in the research of relevant adhesive technology: (1) bonded joint mechanical property understanding is insufficient, relevant Basic Experiment Study imperfection, accumulate lessly, form unified, complete strength design standard.For example the mensuration (rigid material is to rigid material) of GB-T7124-2008 < < tackifier tensile shear strength, although > > has provided the tensile shear strength method of testing of a kind of rigid material to the bonded part of rigid material, has wherein also been stipulated " this experimentation is not as design data ".(2) for prediction of strength and the method for designing at vehicle body Typical Joints and important bonding position, in engineering, also lack effective research means.(3) not intensity evaluation model, especially the adhesive property evaluation under complex stress condition and varying environment effectively in the CAE numerical simulation analysis of bonded structure, need to carry out probing into of system.
Summary of the invention
The present invention is directed to the problem existing in existing automobile-used bonding agent adhesive technology, utilize automobile-used bonded structure bondline thickness thinner, glue-line especially with the most outstanding feature of shear stress in glue-line mormal stress and plane, proposes a kind of bonding strength check method based on shear stress in bonding plane normal normal stress and plane under the force-bearing situation of various complexity.
A bonding strength check method for automobile-used bonding agent, step 1, the bonding angle of the many groups of making are respectively α
nautomobile-used bonding test specimen, it is carried out to tension failure experiment; Step 2, according to the automobile-used bonding test specimen of many group different bonding angles suffered normal stress σ, shear stress τ described point in coordinate system when rupture failure, form a critical broken line of bonding agent rupture failure based on normal stress and shear stress; Step 3, by the discrete unit that changes into of automobile-used bonding test specimen to be detected, i.e. glue-line unit, calculating glue-line unit mormal stress is that σ ' and shearing stress are τ ', glue-line unit is in the total stress of bonding plane:
step 4, drawing of glue-line unit are cut than R '
σ τ=σ '/τ ', the line expression formula of glue-line unit and true origin is: y=R '
σ τx; The mormal stress of the intersection point of this line and the critical broken line of described rupture failure is σ " and shearing stress is τ "; The ultimate stress that glue-line unit can bear
step 5, R=p '/p ", 1-R=1-p '/p "; Get 0≤β
1< β
2< 1, if 1-R < 0 represents that the stress that glue-line unit bears has surpassed ultimate stress, this glue-line unit is in explosive area; If 0≤1-R < is β
1, representing that the stress margin of safety of glue-line unit is not enough, this glue-line unit is in warning area; If β
1≤ 1-R < β
2, representing that the stress margin of safety of glue-line unit is suitable, this glue-line unit is in place of safety; If β
2≤ 1-R < 1, represents that the stress margin of safety of glue-line unit is excessive, and this glue-line unit is in low stress area; β
1, β
2for fixed constant.
As further preferably, according to automobile-used operating mode, described β
1=20% and β
2=50%.
As further preferred, described α
nfor being more than or equal to 0 and be less than or equal to 90 degree.
As further preferred, bonding angle [alpha]
nbe respectively 0 °, 15 °, 30 °, 45 °, 60 °, 75 °, 90 °.
Beneficial effect:
Automobile-used bonding agent bonding strength check method of the present invention, can carry out bonding strength check to the vehicle bonded structure under any complex working conditions.
In the situation that working condition that bonded structure bears is definite, can judge whether safety of bonded structure according to check method of the present invention, and by adjusting the approach such as bonded structure form, bond area, glue-spread, make bonded structure reach safe and reliable state.
In the situation that the conditions such as bonded structure form, bond area, glue-spread are definite, can utilize that check method of the present invention is Converse solved goes out maximum safe load and the ultimate load that bonded structure can bear.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is that bonding angle is test specimen mormal stress, the plane shear stress schematic diagram of α.
Fig. 2 is the bonding experiment test specimen of the different bonding angle that adopts in embodiment.
Fig. 3 is the experimental data that bonding test specimen tension failure is destroyed.
Fig. 4 is the critical broken line of bonding agent rupture failure.
Fig. 5 is that schematic diagram is divided in the critical broken line state of strength of bonding agent rupture failure region.
Fig. 6 is EMU vehicle window bonded structure schematic diagram
Fig. 7 is that vehicle window bonded structure Model load applies schematic diagram.
Fig. 8 is a certain glue-line unit strength check schematic diagram.
Fig. 9 is the strength check result of vehicle window bonded structure glue-line unit.
Wherein, 1 for bonding angle be 0 ° experiment test specimen, 2 for bonding angle be 15 ° experiment test specimen, 3 for bonding angle be 30 ° experiment test specimen, 4 for bonding angle be 45 ° experiment test specimen, 5 for bonding angle be 60 ° experiment test specimen, 6 for bonding angle be 75 ° experiment test specimen, 7 for bonding angle be that the experiment test specimen, 8 of 90 ° is for low stress zones, 9 is for safety zone, 10 is for warning region, 11 is for hazardous location, 12 is for side window glass, 13 is for side window aluminum alloy frame, 14 is for bonding glue-line, 15 is for body construction.
Embodiment
The embodiment providing below in conjunction with accompanying drawing is described in further detail the present invention.
The ratio of shear stress τ in mormal stress σ when as shown in Figure 1, bonded adhesives fault rupture destroys and plane compares R for drawing to cut
σ τ.Making n organizes bonding angle and is respectively α
nbonding test specimen, it is carried out to tension failure experiment.The i of take organizes bonding test specimen as example, and its bonding angle is α
i, during rupture failure, mormal stress is σ
i, the shear stress in plane is τ
i:
(R
στ)
i=tanα
i=σ
i/τ
i 1≤i≤n
Convenience of calculation for follow-up, defines in the present invention:
0=α
1< α
2< ... < α
n-1< α
n=pi/2 n>=2 and n are integer
For exemplary illustrated, set up seven groups of bonding agent stretching experiment test specimens that bonding angle is respectively 0 °, 15 °, 30 °, 45 °, 60 °, 75 °, 90 °, as shown in Figure 2, the number of every group of bonding test specimen is 15.As a kind of, preferably, after experiment finishes, get rid of indivedual invalid experimental datas and get the mean value of every group of experimental data as normal stress σ and the shear stress τ of this bonding angle lower glue layer destruction, obtain the data as shown in form in Fig. 3.
As shown in Figure 4, the shear stress τ in bonded adhesives layer plane of take is horizontal ordinate, mormal stress σ is that ordinate is set up coordinate system, according to n group different bonding angle test specimen suffered normal stress σ, shear stress τ described point in coordinate system when the rupture failure, can draw successively n coordinate points (τ
1, σ
1), (τ
2, σ
2) ... (τ
n, σ
n), n coordinate points connected successively, form a critical broken line of bonding agent rupture failure based on normal stress and shear stress.
As shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5, respectively n coordinate points on connection coordinate initial point and critical broken line, obtains n bar line segment, n-1 the delta-shaped region of n-1 bar line segment formation on itself and critical broken line.The implication of the slope representative of n bar line segment compares R for drawing to cut
σ τ, the length of line segment represents that bonding glue-line draws to cut at this and compares R
σ τultimate stress under state, is defined as p, therefore
By the discrete unit that changes into of experiment test specimen to be detected, glue-line unit, according to the mechanics of materials, can ask for the stress state of any one glue-line unit center point, i.e. σ
x, σ
y, σ
z, τ
yz, τ
zx, τ
xy.According to the relation of bonding glue-line unit local coordinate system and bonded structure model global coordinate system, the stress value of unit center point is carried out to changes in coordinates, obtain the normal stress of glue-line unit normal direction and the shear stress in plane.The outer normal direction of supposing the bonding plane in a certain glue-line unit is n ', and its direction cosine are:
cos(n′,x)=l,cos(n′,y)=m,cos(n′,z)=n
Defining this glue-line unit is p ' in the total stress of its bonding plane, the p ' for projection in coordinate axis
x, p '
y, p '
zrepresent.According to equilibrium condition, can obtain
p′
x=lσ
x+mτ
xy+nτ
zx
p′
y=mσ
y+nτ
yz+lτ
xy
p′
z=nσ
z+lτ
zx+mτ
yz
The mormal stress of supposing the bonding plane in glue-line unit is σ ', and shearing stress is τ ',
σ′=lp′
x+mp′
y+np′
z
Drawing of this glue-line unit cut than R '
σ τ=σ '/τ ', by its with critical broken line on n coordinate points corresponding draw to cut compare R
σ τcompare, if:
(R
στ)
n-1≤R′
στ≤(R
στ)
n
This glue-line unit (τ ', σ ') in n-1 delta-shaped region, the line segment on the corresponding critical broken line in this region can be by coordinate points (τ
n-1, σ
n-1), (τ
n, σ
n) express, straight line expression formula is:
The line expression formula of this glue-line unit and true origin is: y=R '
σ τx
According to above straight line expression formula, obtain joining (τ ", σ "):
P " be the ultimate stress that this glue-line unit can bear, get:
R=p′/p″
1-R=1-p′/p″
The implication of 1-R representative is the margin of safety of bonding glue-line element stress, determines the strength check result of this glue-line unit according to value 1-R size.Get 0≤β
1< β
2< 1, if 1-R < 0 represents that the stress that glue-line unit bears has surpassed ultimate stress, this glue-line unit is in explosive area; If 0≤1-R < is β
1, representing that the stress margin of safety of glue-line unit is not enough, this glue-line unit is in warning area; If β
1≤ 1-R < β
2, representing that the stress margin of safety of glue-line unit is suitable, this glue-line unit is in place of safety; If β
2≤ 1-R < 1, represents that the stress margin of safety of glue-line unit is excessive, and this glue-line unit is in low stress area.β
1, β
2value size should be determined according to the concrete applying working condition of bonded structure.
As a kind of preferred, according to the experience in design of automobile-used bonding agent, in the present embodiment, get β
1=20%, β
2=50%, the region that is margin of safety 50%≤1-R < 100% of answering of bonding glue-line unit is that the region of low stress area 8,20%≤1-R < 50% is that the region of place of safety 9,0≤1-R < 20% is that the region of warning area 10,1-R < 0 is explosive area 11, as shown in Figure 5.
Exemplary, bonding angle is respectively seven groups of bonding agent stretching experiment test specimens of 0 °, 15 °, 30 °, 45 °, 60 °, 75 °, 90 °; The shear stress τ in bonded adhesives layer plane of take is horizontal ordinate, mormal stress σ is that ordinate is set up coordinate system, according to the experimental data shown in form in Fig. 2 described point line in coordinate system, obtain the critical broken line of bonding agent rupture failure as shown in Figure 3, seven coordinate points are connected respectively at true origin, the critical broken line graph of bonding agent rupture failure can be divided into six regions, as shown in Figure 4, seven lines are corresponding to be drawn to cut and compares R
σ τbe followed successively by:
(R
στ)
1=0 (R
στ)
2=0.27 (R
στ)
3=0.58 (R
στ)
4=1
(R
στ)
5=1.73 (R
στ)
6=3.73 (R
στ)
7=∞
For exemplary illustrated, the present invention chooses window structure in EMU as bonded structure to be checked.Window structure mainly comprises side window glass (12), side window aluminum alloy frame (13) two parts.Window structure is as sub-unit parts, by the bonding assembling of finishing dealing with of side window aluminum alloy frame (13) and body construction (15), as shown in Figure 6.
Main force-bearing situation according to window structure in EMU operational process, to window structure model imposed load: in order to simulate in motor train unit high-speed cruising process, due to what pressure difference inside and outside vehicle window caused, act on the acting force on glass for vehicle window, on the glass unit at window structure model middle part, apply uniformly distributed load, as shown in Figure 7 (a); The remaining shear force that may exist after bonding in order to simulate window structure and body construction, applies the acting force of a pair of opposite direction, as shown in Figure 7 (b) shows in the diagonal of vehicle window.
According to the mechanics of materials, by calculating the stress state of bonding glue-line unit.Therefrom appoint and get a glue-line unit, according to described bonding glue-line strength check methods, this glue-line unit is checked.Calculate the stress value of this glue-line unit:
σ
x=5.715264e-5Pa τ
xy=1.086516e-5Pa
σ
y=5.747150e-5Pa τ
yz=2.545583e+6Pa
σ
z=3.131656e+6Pa τ
zx=2.545575e+6Pa
This unit bonding plane normal direction cosine is:
l=0.00 m=0.00 n=1.00
According to shear stress method for solving in described glue-line unit mormal stress and plane, can obtain:
τ′=3.60MPa σ′=3.13MPa
R′
στ=σ′/τ′=0.8694
Owing to drawing, cut than size contrast (R
σ τ)
3< R '
σ τ< (R
σ τ)
4, this glue-line unit is arranged in the 3rd delta-shaped region, according to described computing formula solve joining (τ ", σ "):
τ″=5.76MPa σ″=5.00MPa
R=p′/p″=0.625
1-R=0.325=32.5%
Therefore can judge this glue-line unit is positioned at place of safety, and the stress state that this glue-line unit bears is safe condition.In like manner can carry out strength check to other glue-line unit, obtain vehicle window bonded structure glue-line unit strength check result as shown in Figure 9.
The above-mentioned description to embodiment is can understand and apply the invention for ease of those skilled in the art.Person skilled in the art obviously can easily make various modifications to these embodiment, and General Principle described herein is applied in other embodiment and needn't passes through performing creative labour.Therefore, the invention is not restricted to the embodiment here, those skilled in the art are according to announcement of the present invention, and not departing from the improvement that category of the present invention makes and revise all should be within protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (4)
1. a bonding strength check method for automobile-used bonding agent, is characterized in that:
Step 1, the bonding angle of the many groups of making are respectively α
nautomobile-used bonding test specimen, it is carried out to tension failure experiment;
Step 2, according to the automobile-used bonding test specimen of many group different bonding angles suffered normal stress σ, shear stress τ described point in coordinate system when rupture failure, form a critical broken line of bonding agent rupture failure based on normal stress and shear stress;
Step 3, by the discrete unit that changes into of automobile-used bonding test specimen to be detected, i.e. glue-line unit, calculating glue-line unit mormal stress is that σ ' and shearing stress are τ ', glue-line unit is in the total stress of bonding plane:
Step 4, drawing of glue-line unit are cut than R '
σ τ=σ '/τ ', the line expression formula of glue-line unit and true origin is: y=R '
σ τx; The mormal stress of the intersection point of this line and the critical broken line of described rupture failure is σ " and shearing stress is τ "; The ultimate stress that glue-line unit can bear
Step 5, R=p '/p ", 1-R=1-p '/p "; Get 0≤β
1< β
2< 1, if 1-R < 0 represents that the stress that glue-line unit bears has surpassed ultimate stress, this glue-line unit is in explosive area; If 0≤1-R < is β
1, representing that the stress margin of safety of glue-line unit is not enough, this glue-line unit is in warning area; If β
1≤ 1-R < β
2, representing that the stress margin of safety of glue-line unit is suitable, this glue-line unit is in place of safety; If β
2≤ 1-R < 1, represents that the stress margin of safety of glue-line unit is excessive, and this glue-line unit is in low stress area; β
1, β
2for fixed constant.
2. the bonding strength check method of automobile-used bonding agent according to claim 1, is characterized in that: according to automobile-used operating mode, and described β
1=20% and β
2=50%.
3. the bonding strength check method of automobile-used bonding agent according to claim 1 and 2, is characterized in that: described α
nfor being more than or equal to 0 and be less than or equal to 90 degree.
4. the bonding strength check method of automobile-used bonding agent according to claim 3, is characterized in that: bonding angle [alpha]
nbe respectively 0 °, 15 °, 30 °, 45 °, 60 °, 75 °, 90 °.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410014454.4A CN103743671B (en) | 2014-01-13 | 2014-01-13 | Bonding strength checking method for vehicle adhesive |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410014454.4A CN103743671B (en) | 2014-01-13 | 2014-01-13 | Bonding strength checking method for vehicle adhesive |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN103743671A true CN103743671A (en) | 2014-04-23 |
CN103743671B CN103743671B (en) | 2015-04-15 |
Family
ID=50500709
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410014454.4A Expired - Fee Related CN103743671B (en) | 2014-01-13 | 2014-01-13 | Bonding strength checking method for vehicle adhesive |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN103743671B (en) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105092464A (en) * | 2014-05-13 | 2015-11-25 | 湖北航天化学技术研究所 | Gas source grain propellant-coating interference bonding strength detection method |
CN110031398A (en) * | 2019-04-19 | 2019-07-19 | 华北水利水电大学 | A kind of composite material car body bonded structure and strength design |
CN110175396A (en) * | 2019-05-24 | 2019-08-27 | 吉林大学 | A kind of bonded structure Analysis of Fracture Failure method based on unified stress criterion |
CN110222420A (en) * | 2019-06-06 | 2019-09-10 | 吉林大学 | A kind of failure judgment method of viscous riveting connection structure |
CN111751272A (en) * | 2020-07-03 | 2020-10-09 | 北京理工大学 | Ultrasonic detection and tensile calibration test method for bonding strength grade |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030085255A1 (en) * | 2001-11-07 | 2003-05-08 | Farhad Farassat | Method of testing bonded connections, and a wire bonder |
US7448279B2 (en) * | 2004-03-06 | 2008-11-11 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Device for testing material properties with regard to combined tensile and shear loads, in particular for testing adhesives |
CN101806712A (en) * | 2010-03-19 | 2010-08-18 | 厦门市建筑工程检测中心有限公司 | On-site testing method for tensile adhesive strength of existing curtain wall structural silicone sealant |
CN102183412A (en) * | 2011-02-18 | 2011-09-14 | 浙江大学 | Tension-shear coupling characteristic tester of asphalt concrete material |
CN102621061A (en) * | 2012-02-24 | 2012-08-01 | 欧力大卡贸易(滁州)有限公司 | Method for testing rubber bonding strength of automobile parts |
-
2014
- 2014-01-13 CN CN201410014454.4A patent/CN103743671B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030085255A1 (en) * | 2001-11-07 | 2003-05-08 | Farhad Farassat | Method of testing bonded connections, and a wire bonder |
US7448279B2 (en) * | 2004-03-06 | 2008-11-11 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Device for testing material properties with regard to combined tensile and shear loads, in particular for testing adhesives |
CN101806712A (en) * | 2010-03-19 | 2010-08-18 | 厦门市建筑工程检测中心有限公司 | On-site testing method for tensile adhesive strength of existing curtain wall structural silicone sealant |
CN102183412A (en) * | 2011-02-18 | 2011-09-14 | 浙江大学 | Tension-shear coupling characteristic tester of asphalt concrete material |
CN102621061A (en) * | 2012-02-24 | 2012-08-01 | 欧力大卡贸易(滁州)有限公司 | Method for testing rubber bonding strength of automobile parts |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局等: "胶粘剂 拉伸剪切强度的测定", 《中华人民共和国国家标准GB/T7124-2008》 * |
周红萍: "三种黏结剂的力学性能对比", 《中国工程物理研究院科技年报》 * |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105092464A (en) * | 2014-05-13 | 2015-11-25 | 湖北航天化学技术研究所 | Gas source grain propellant-coating interference bonding strength detection method |
CN110031398A (en) * | 2019-04-19 | 2019-07-19 | 华北水利水电大学 | A kind of composite material car body bonded structure and strength design |
CN110175396A (en) * | 2019-05-24 | 2019-08-27 | 吉林大学 | A kind of bonded structure Analysis of Fracture Failure method based on unified stress criterion |
CN110222420A (en) * | 2019-06-06 | 2019-09-10 | 吉林大学 | A kind of failure judgment method of viscous riveting connection structure |
CN111751272A (en) * | 2020-07-03 | 2020-10-09 | 北京理工大学 | Ultrasonic detection and tensile calibration test method for bonding strength grade |
CN111751272B (en) * | 2020-07-03 | 2021-09-07 | 北京理工大学 | Ultrasonic detection and tensile calibration test method for bonding strength grade |
US11733210B2 (en) | 2020-07-03 | 2023-08-22 | Beijing Institute Of Technology | Ultrasonic detection and tensile calibration test method for bonding strength grade |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN103743671B (en) | 2015-04-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN103743671B (en) | Bonding strength checking method for vehicle adhesive | |
He | A review of finite element analysis of adhesively bonded joints | |
Renton et al. | On the behavior of bonded joints in composite material structures | |
Goh et al. | Effects of bondline flaws on the damage tolerance of composite scarf joints | |
Quaresimin et al. | Stress intensity factors and strain energy release rates in single lap bonded joints in composite materials | |
Machado et al. | Numerical study of impact behaviour of mixed adhesive single lap joints for the automotive industry | |
Créac'Hcadec et al. | A stress concentration-free bonded arcan tensile compression shear test specimen for the evaluation of adhesive mechanical response | |
Cognard et al. | Influence of adhesive thickness on the behaviour of bonded assemblies under shear loadings using a modified TAST fixture | |
Barzegar et al. | Progressive damage analysis of an adhesively bonded composite T-joint under bending, considering micro-scale effects of fiber volume fraction of adherends | |
Ungureanu et al. | Experimental and numerical investigation of adhesively bonded single lap and thick adherents joints between pultruded GFRP composite profiles | |
Créac'Hcadec et al. | Experimental analysis of the mechanical behaviour of a thick flexible adhesive under tensile/compression-shear loads | |
Jousset et al. | Implementation, identification and validation of an elasto-plastic-damage model for the finite element simulation of structural bonded joints | |
Kai et al. | Failure mode shift of sandwich composite L-Joint for ship structures under tension load | |
Xiao et al. | Stiffness prediction of the double lap shear joint. Part1: Analytical solution | |
Maurice et al. | Characterization and modelling of the 3D elastic–plastic behaviour of an adhesively bonded joint under monotonic tension/compression-shear loads: influence of three cure cycles | |
Linden et al. | Strain energy release rate in shaft-loaded blister tests for composite repairs on steel | |
Tahani et al. | On thermomechanical stress analysis of adhesively bonded composite joints in presence of an interfacial void | |
Samborsky et al. | Static and fatigue testing of thick adhesive joints for wind turbine blades | |
Lee et al. | A study on fatigue fracture at double and tapered cantilever beam specimens bonded with aluminum foams | |
Na et al. | An adhesive joint strength evaluation method and its application in mechanical engineering | |
Fernandez et al. | Experimental identification of static and dynamic strength of epoxy based adhesives in high thickness joints | |
Lagunegrand et al. | Design of an improved four point bending test on a sandwich beam for free edge delamination studies | |
Adams | Testing of adhesives-useful or not | |
Ferreira et al. | Static strength prediction of curved composite joints under internal pressure | |
Mohapatra et al. | A comparison of hydrostatic and plastic yield criteria for a toughened adhesive |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
C14 | Grant of patent or utility model | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20150415 Termination date: 20190113 |
|
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |