CN103476051A - Method for evaluating importance of nodes in communication network - Google Patents
Method for evaluating importance of nodes in communication network Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN103476051A CN103476051A CN2013104133879A CN201310413387A CN103476051A CN 103476051 A CN103476051 A CN 103476051A CN 2013104133879 A CN2013104133879 A CN 2013104133879A CN 201310413387 A CN201310413387 A CN 201310413387A CN 103476051 A CN103476051 A CN 103476051A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- node
- index
- normalization
- network
- betweenness
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to a method for evaluating the importance of nodes in a communication network, and belongs to the technical field of node analysis in the network. The method for evaluating the importance of the nodes in the communication network comprises the following steps: (1) establishing a mathematical model of a weighted network according to the actual communication network, (2) respectively calculating basic indexes, including a node degree k, a node betweenness b, a feature vector index Ce and a compactness index Cc, of the weighted network, conducting normalization, (3) conducting linear combined weighting on an F1, an F2, an F3 and an F4 to obtain a final score F of a comprehensive evaluation, (4) ranking the n nodes according to the value of the final score F of the comprehensive evaluation, using the nodes in the higher rank as the important nodes in the actual communication network, and therefore determining the importance of the nodes in the actual communication network. According to the method for evaluating the importance of the nodes in the communication network, firstly, the bandwidth is utilized for weighting the actual communication network, and then ranking of the importance of the nodes is achieved through the comprehensive evaluation.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of communication net node importance evaluation method, the invention belongs to the nodes analysis technical field.
Background technology
Along with the fast development of communication and information technology, the coverage rate of communication network progressively enlarges, and the business of carrying increases gradually, and the effect in modern large-scale network system is more and more important.Meanwhile, the nodes of communication network will constantly increase, and its complexity constantly increases, so to the node importance of communication network research or necessary.The appraisal procedure of complex network node importance mainly contains in recent years:
(1) based on being connected between this node and other nodes: be the criterion using the degree of node as node importance the most simply, think that this node is more important more at most on the limit be connected with node, obvious this appraisal procedure has one-sidedness, some important core node might not have larger connection degree, such as only having two bridge nodes that limit is connected.
(2) method of deleting based on node (collection): core concept is " importance is equivalent to the deleted rear destructiveness to network of this node (collection) ".To the excavation of important node in network, be that the variation of network connectivty before and after deleting by node (collection), performance reflects.A lot of documents have all been used the delet method of node, suppose node failure, by the variation of comparing deletion of node front and back network performance, assess the node importance degree.The problem that the knot removal method exists is that the importance degree of these nodes will be consistent so if the deletion of a plurality of nodes all makes network not be communicated with, thereby makes the assessment result inaccuracy.
(3) node contraction method: by shrinking the limit be connected with this node, think after shrinking that higher this node of network cohesion degree obtained is more important.Network cohesion level index is mainly considered the connection degree of node and the shortest path of process node, assesses the contribution of node to network.Shrinking is to weigh and assess a kind of effective method of node importance in network.Its advantage is mainly: do not need node is removed, basis is more widely arranged in application.Meanwhile, also there is certain shortcoming in shrinking, mainly contains: have no idea symmetrical node is estimated, and for general node, also wayward its contraction scope.
The basic network topological parameter of complex network comprises the degree of node, betweenness, characteristic vector, tightness etc.The number of degrees of node refer to the limit number that connects this node, reflection be the direct influence of a node for other node in network.
Betweenness has been portrayed the possibility of information flow through given node, and the betweenness of arbitrary node all can increase along with the increase of the information flow through this node, utilizes betweenness can determine the network node that information loads is heavy.Brandes betweenness centrality algorithm is to be proposed to solve the algorithm of betweenness by Ulrik Brandes, core concept is to appoint that to get a node be source node, search the shortest path of other node to this node by breadth-first search, then calculate the corresponding betweenness value of these shortest paths.Cumulative take scheme in the arbitrary node betweenness value that is source node, just obtain the final betweenness value of all nodes and limit in figure.
Characteristic vector can be used for analyzing that indirect influence obtained by the adjacent node with height value, can not only directly reflect the Central Position of network, also is applicable to the Long-term Effect power of description node.Consider the meaning of parameters, parameters is carried out to linear combination, can overcome the defect that single index is described Centroid, more can react the center of node in network.
Tightness is the inverse apart from sum of all other nodes of this node arrival, arrive the complexity of other node in network by network for the node of portraying network, what reflect is the ability that node is exerted one's influence to other nodes by network, more can reflect the global structure of network.Internodal distance can be obtained by the Floyd algorithm, and its main thought is: from representing any 2 vertex v
ito v
jthe cum rights adjacency matrix of distance start, insert a vertex v at every turn
k, then by v
ito v
jbetween known shortest path with insert vertex v
kissuable v during as intermediate vertex (other summits in a paths except initial point and terminal)
ito v
jpath distance relatively, is got smaller value to obtain new distance matrix.
Summary of the invention
The object of the invention is to overcome the deficiencies in the prior art, on the basis of network characterization parametric synthesis, by the bandwidth in communication network, be weighted, take full advantage of the intrinsic property of communication network, solve the importance ranking problem of node in communication network, a kind of communication net node importance evaluation method is provided.
A kind of communication net node importance evaluation method, the method comprises the following steps:
Step 1: according to actual communication network, set up the network Model of having the right;
In actual communication network, the node number is n, and the number on limit is m, the figure G for network Model that has the right of this actual communication network
gand connection matrix H=[h
ij] be described below:
G
G=(N,L) (1)
In formula: the set that N is node in communication network, N={n
1, n
2, n
3... n
n;
The set that L is one group of limit of having the right, L={l
1, l
2, l
3... l
m;
Element h in connection matrix H
ijbe defined as follows:
Limit power adjacency matrix W
gas follows:
Wherein, limit power adjacency matrix W
gmatrix element W
gijfor:
In formula, Bi
jweights for circuit between node i and node j;
The connection matrix H after weighting
qcan be expressed as:
H
Q=H*W
G (5)
In formula, in the * representing matrix, corresponding element multiplies each other;
Step 2: the node number of degrees k that calculates respectively weighted network
i, node betweenness b
i, characteristic vector index C
eand tightness index C (i)
c(i) basic index, the professional etiquette of going forward side by side is formatted, and obtains degree of normalization index F
1, normalization betweenness index F
2, normalization characteristic vector index F
3, normalization tightness index F
4:
1) normalization degree index F
1
The number of degrees k of i node
ithe number that connects the limit of this node,
To k
istandardized, can degree of normalization index F
1as follows:
F
1=k
i/(n-1) (7)
2) normalization betweenness index F
2
The betweenness b of i node
iportrayed the influence power of the node in the network for information flow; If network has n node, the betweenness b of node i
ibe defined as:
In formula, δ
st(i) mean to account for by the shortest path number of this node (limit) ratio of all shortest paths, g
stmean the shortest path number between node s and node t; g
st(i) mean the shortest path number of process node i between node s and node t, betweenness b
ican utilize Brandes betweenness centrality algorithm to obtain;
To b
istandardized, betweenness index F obtains standardizing
2as follows:
F
2=2b
i/(n-1)(n-2) (10)
3) normalization characteristic vector index F
3
If λ is matrix H
qdominant eigenvalue, e=(e
1, e
2..., e
n) be λ characteristic of correspondence vector, the characteristic vector index C of i node
e(i) be defined as:
Wherein λ and e meet:
H
Q·e=λ·e (12)
To C
e(i) standardized, the characteristic vector of can standardizing index F
3as follows:
F
3=C
e(i)/max(C
e) (13)
4) normalization tightness index F
4
The tightness index C of i node
c(i) be defined as the inverse apart from sum that this node arrives all other nodes, that is:
Wherein, d
ijfor connecting the shortest path length of any two node i and j, can be obtained by the Floyd algorithm;
To C
c(i) standardized, the tightness of can standardizing index F
4as follows:
F
4=C
c(i)i(n-1) (15)
Step 3: to the normalization degree index F of n node of weighted network
1, normalization betweenness index F
2, normalization characteristic vector index F
3with normalization tightness index F
4, carrying out Result for Combinations, to obtain the final score F of each node overall merit as follows:
Wherein, α
kweight coefficient,
Step 4: according to the size of the final score F value of n node overall merit, n node sorted, get the forward node of sequence, as the important node in actual communication network, thereby determine the importance of node in power telecom network.
Beneficial effect of the present invention: at first the present invention utilizes bandwidth to be weighted actual communication network, then the basic parameters such as degree, betweenness, characteristic vector and tightness of network topology are carried out comprehensively, realizes the sequence of node importance.This invention is all considered the network various aspects, is particularly suitable for communication network, and the conceptual design of relevant issues is had to certain reference, simultaneously also significant for the maintenance of network.
The accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is the FB(flow block) of the inventive method;
Fig. 2 is the network topology structure schematic diagram of example of the present invention;
Fig. 3 is the network topology structure schematic diagram after weighting of the present invention.
Embodiment
Below in conjunction with accompanying drawing, embodiments of the present invention are described further:
As shown in Figure 1, the FB(flow block) of the inventive method, a kind of communication net node importance evaluation method, is characterized in that, the method comprises the following steps:
Step 1: according to actual communication network, set up the network Model of having the right;
In the network of having the right of actual communication network, the node number is n, and the number on limit is m, figure G for the Mathematical Modeling of the network of having the right of this actual communication network
gand connection matrix H=[h
ij] be described below:
G
G=(N,L) (1)
In formula, the set that N is node in communication network, N={n
1, n
2, n
3... n
n;
The set that L is one group of limit of having the right, L={l
1, l
2, l
3... l
m;
Element h in connection matrix H
ijbe defined as follows:
See Fig. 2, the connection matrix with network topological diagram of connection shows as follows:
Limit power adjacency matrix W
gas follows:
Wherein, limit power adjacency matrix W
gmatrix element W
gijfor:
In formula, B
ijweights for circuit between node i and node j.
In communication network as shown in Figure 3 between node 7 and node 11 bandwidth on limit be 2.5GHz, other sideband is wide is 1GHz, to the limit between node 7 and node 11, gives 2.5 weights, the weights on other limit are 1, power connection matrix in limit is as follows:
The connection matrix H after weighting
qcan be expressed as:
H
Q=H*W
G (5)
In formula, in the * representing matrix, corresponding element multiplies each other, limit power adjacency matrix H
qembodied the variation of the connection matrix after the weighting.
The connection matrix after weighting is:
Step 2: node number of degrees k, the node betweenness b, the characteristic vector index C that calculate respectively weighted network
ewith tightness index C
cdeng basic index, the professional etiquette of going forward side by side is formatted:
1) normalization degree index F
1
The number of degrees k of i node
ithe number that connects the limit of this node,
To k
istandardized, can degree of normalization index F
1as follows:
F
1=k
i/(n-1) (7)
2) normalization betweenness index F
2
The betweenness b of i node
iportrayed the influence power of the node in the network for information flow.If network has n node, the betweenness b of node i
ibe defined as:
In formula, δ
st(i) mean to account for by the shortest path number of this node (limit) ratio of all shortest paths, g
stmean the shortest path number between node s and node t; g
st(i) mean the shortest path number of process node i between node s and node t.Betweenness b
ican utilize Brandes betweenness centrality algorithm to obtain, concrete steps are:
The betweenness value of the arbitrary node i of definition based on source node s:
Wherein N is the node set of figure G:
And δ
s(i) can, by take s as root node, the breadth first traversal of figure G be tried to achieve.
To b
istandardized, betweenness index F obtains standardizing
2as follows:
F
2=2b
i/(n-1)(n-2) (12)
3) normalization characteristic vector index F
3
If λ is matrix H
qdominant eigenvalue, e=(e
1, e
2..., e
n) be λ characteristic of correspondence vector, the characteristic vector index C of i node
e(i) be defined as:
Wherein λ and e meet:
H
Q·e=λ·e (14)
The solution procedure of λ and e is as follows:
(a) first obtain the characteristic value of matrix: | H
q-λ E|=0;
(b) each eigenvalue λ is obtained to (H
q-λ E) Basic Solutions of X=0 is e
1, e
2..., e
n;
(c) H
qthe characteristic vector that belongs to eigenvalue λ be exactly e
1, e
2..., e
nnon-zero linear combination.
To C
e(i) standardized, the characteristic vector of can standardizing index F
3as follows:
F
3=C
e(i)/max(C
e) (15)
4) normalization tightness index F
4
The tightness index C of i node
c(i) be defined as the inverse apart from sum that this node arrives all other nodes, that is:
Wherein, d
ijfor the shortest path length of node i and j, can be obtained by the Floyd algorithm.Concrete computational process is as follows:
Floyd algorithm adjacency matrix D used is:
Define a matrix P and be used for recording the information of institute insertion point, P[i, j] mean from V
ito V
jthe point that needs process, initialization P[i, j]=j.
Each summit is inserted in figure respectively, more relatively inserts respectively the size of distance after the k of summit and former distance:
D[i,j]=min(D[i,j],D[i,k]+D[k,j]) (18)
If D[i, j] value diminish, P[i, j]=k.Finally in D, include the information of shortest path length between 2, comprised the information in shortest path footpath in P.
To C
c(i) standardized, the tightness of can standardizing index F
4as follows:
F
4=C
c(i)i(n-1) (19)
Calculate respectively normalization degree, betweenness, characteristic vector and the tightness index of each node after not weighted sum weighting, as table 1, shown in table 2.
Table 1 is normalization degree, betweenness, characteristic vector, the tightness index of each node of weighted network not
The normalization degree of each node of table 2 weighted network, betweenness, characteristic vector, tightness index
N the node normalization degree index F to weighted network
1, normalization betweenness index F
2, normalization characteristic vector index F
3with normalization tightness index F
4, carrying out Result for Combinations, to obtain the final score F of each node overall merit as follows:
Wherein, α
kweight coefficient,
The weight coefficient of normalization degree, betweenness, characteristic vector and the tightness of node gets respectively 0.2,0.25,0.35,0.2;
Step 4: according to the size of the final score F value of n node overall merit, n node sorted, get the forward node of sequence, as the important node in actual communication network, thereby determine the importance of node in actual communication network.
The node importance sequence obtained, as shown in table 3.
The contrast of table 3 node importance result of calculation
In network topological diagram as shown in Figure 2, for before weighting not, utilize synthesis and shrinkage method at first to calculate node importance, as shown in Table 3, node 4, node 5, node 9, node 10 are most important side by side; For the network after weighting, as Fig. 3, weighting node 7-11, the importance that can be obtained node 7 and node 11 by synthesis obviously improves, and it is important to be still node 4,5,9,10 for shrinkage method, like this can sufficient proof this method for the selection of core node in weighted network, there is certain advantage.Especially for power telecom network, the power telecom network Centroid is important, but the degree of its Centroid is often not high, be difficult to find Centroid according to the method for not weighting, and due to the intrinsic property of Centroid, add the bandwidth weighting, calculated by synthesis, can very effectively find Centroid.
Claims (1)
1. a communication net node importance evaluation method, is characterized in that, the method comprises the following steps:
Step 1: according to actual communication network, set up the network Model of having the right;
In actual communication network, the node number is n, and the number on limit is m, the figure G for network Model that has the right of this actual communication network
gand connection matrix H=[h
ij] be described below:
G
G=(N,L) (1)
In formula: the set that N is node in communication network, N={n
1, n
2, n
3... n
n;
The set that L is one group of limit of having the right, L={l
1, l
2, l
3... l
m;
Element h in connection matrix H
ijbe defined as follows:
Limit power adjacency matrix W
gas follows:
Wherein, limit power adjacency matrix W
gmatrix element W
gijfor:
In formula, B
ijweights for circuit between node i and node j;
The connection matrix H after weighting
qcan be expressed as:
H
Q=H*W
G (5)
In formula, in the * representing matrix, corresponding element multiplies each other;
Step 2: the node number of degrees k that calculates respectively weighted network
i, node betweenness b
i, characteristic vector index C
eand tightness index C (i)
c(i) basic index, the professional etiquette of going forward side by side is formatted, and obtains degree of normalization index F
1, normalization betweenness index F
2, normalization characteristic vector index F
3, normalization tightness index F
4:
1) normalization degree index F
1
The number of degrees k of i node
ithe number that connects the limit of this node,
To k
istandardized, can degree of normalization index F
1as follows:
F
1=k
i/(n-1) (7)
2) normalization betweenness index F
2
The betweenness b of i node
iportrayed the influence power of the node in the network for information flow; If network has n node, the betweenness b of node i
ibe defined as:
In formula, δ
st(i) mean to account for by the shortest path number of this node (limit) ratio of all shortest paths, g
stmean the shortest path number between node s and node t; g
st(i) mean the shortest path number of process node i between node s and node t, betweenness b
ican utilize Brandes betweenness centrality algorithm to obtain;
To b
istandardized, betweenness index F obtains standardizing
2as follows:
F
2=2b
i/(n-1)(n-2) (10)
3) normalization characteristic vector index F
3
If λ is matrix H
qdominant eigenvalue, e=(e
1, e
2..., e
n) be λ characteristic of correspondence vector, the characteristic vector index C of i node
e(i) be defined as:
Wherein λ and e meet:
H
Q·e=λ·e (12)
To C
e(i) standardized, the characteristic vector of can standardizing index F
3as follows:
F
3=C
e(i)/max(C
e) (13)
4) normalization tightness index F
4
The tightness index C of i node
c(i) be defined as the inverse apart from sum that this node arrives all other nodes, that is:
Wherein, d
ijfor connecting the shortest path length of any two node i and j, can be obtained by the Floyd algorithm;
To C
c(i) standardized, the tightness of can standardizing index F
4as follows:
F
4=C
c(i)i(n-1) (15)
Step 3: to the normalization degree index F of n node of weighted network
1, normalization betweenness index F
2, normalization characteristic vector index F
3with normalization tightness index F
4, carrying out Result for Combinations, to obtain the final score F of each node overall merit as follows:
Wherein, α
kweight coefficient,
Step 4: according to the size of the final score F value of n node overall merit, n node sorted, get the forward node of sequence, as the important node in actual communication network, thereby determine the importance of node in power telecom network.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201310413387.9A CN103476051B (en) | 2013-09-11 | 2013-09-11 | A kind of communication net node importance evaluation method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201310413387.9A CN103476051B (en) | 2013-09-11 | 2013-09-11 | A kind of communication net node importance evaluation method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN103476051A true CN103476051A (en) | 2013-12-25 |
CN103476051B CN103476051B (en) | 2016-04-13 |
Family
ID=49800718
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201310413387.9A Expired - Fee Related CN103476051B (en) | 2013-09-11 | 2013-09-11 | A kind of communication net node importance evaluation method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN103476051B (en) |
Cited By (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103906271A (en) * | 2014-04-21 | 2014-07-02 | 西安电子科技大学 | Method for measuring key nodes in Ad Hoc network |
CN103957114A (en) * | 2014-02-24 | 2014-07-30 | 国家电网公司 | Network survivability assessment method based on variation coefficient |
CN104363127A (en) * | 2014-11-28 | 2015-02-18 | 广东电网有限责任公司电力调度控制中心 | Method for building electric power communication network based on grid influence factor |
CN104579867A (en) * | 2014-11-28 | 2015-04-29 | 广东电网有限责任公司电力调度控制中心 | Electric power communication network construction method based on node aggregation coefficients |
CN104811397A (en) * | 2015-03-24 | 2015-07-29 | 中国人民解放军国防科学技术大学 | Method for estimating node significance of complex network based on node state evolution |
CN104915504A (en) * | 2015-06-18 | 2015-09-16 | 莫毓昌 | BFS strategy improvement method used for novel calculation network reliability evaluation |
CN104992266A (en) * | 2015-06-15 | 2015-10-21 | 广东电网有限责任公司电力调度控制中心 | Method of determining power grid node importance degree and system thereof |
CN105306540A (en) * | 2015-09-24 | 2016-02-03 | 华东师范大学 | Method for obtaining top k nodes with maximum influence in social network |
CN105490840A (en) * | 2015-11-26 | 2016-04-13 | 电子科技大学 | Fault diagnosis test point selection method based on network topological structure |
CN105550191A (en) * | 2015-07-10 | 2016-05-04 | 成都信息工程大学 | Node importance ranking method for multi-layer network |
CN105871594A (en) * | 2016-03-22 | 2016-08-17 | 华北电力大学(保定) | Method for calculating important degrees of nodes of power communication network |
CN106375104A (en) * | 2015-07-24 | 2017-02-01 | 国家电网公司 | Method of recognizing key point of power communication network |
CN107070995A (en) * | 2017-03-16 | 2017-08-18 | 中国科学院信息工程研究所 | The caching method and device of a kind of content center network |
CN107395393A (en) * | 2017-06-14 | 2017-11-24 | 华北电力大学 | A kind of power communication backbone network node evaluation method of automatic weight coefficient |
CN107846293A (en) * | 2016-09-19 | 2018-03-27 | 中国电信股份有限公司 | The computational methods and device of IPv6 communication capacities |
CN108399491A (en) * | 2018-02-02 | 2018-08-14 | 浙江工业大学 | A kind of employee's diversity ranking method based on network |
CN109104307A (en) * | 2018-07-27 | 2018-12-28 | 电子科技大学 | A kind of key node cognitive method of dynamic data chain network |
CN109756422A (en) * | 2019-03-27 | 2019-05-14 | 山东浪潮云信息技术有限公司 | A kind of forwarding routing node choosing method |
CN111800201A (en) * | 2020-06-24 | 2020-10-20 | 西北工业大学 | Method for identifying key nodes of Sink node underwater acoustic sensor network |
CN114637236A (en) * | 2022-03-03 | 2022-06-17 | 国网电力科学研究院有限公司 | Time delay calculation method and device based on hybrid frequency stabilization control system and storage medium |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101145976A (en) * | 2007-10-31 | 2008-03-19 | 北京航空航天大学 | Super-node selection and resource search method for peer network with node priority |
US20110167071A1 (en) * | 2010-01-05 | 2011-07-07 | O Wave Media Co., Ltd. | Method for scoring individual network competitiveness and network effect in an online social network |
CN102196461A (en) * | 2011-06-22 | 2011-09-21 | 韩山师范学院 | Evaluation method for importance of sensor network node |
CN102880799A (en) * | 2012-09-24 | 2013-01-16 | 西北工业大学 | Method for comprehensively evaluating importance of complicated network node based on multi-attribute decision-making |
-
2013
- 2013-09-11 CN CN201310413387.9A patent/CN103476051B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101145976A (en) * | 2007-10-31 | 2008-03-19 | 北京航空航天大学 | Super-node selection and resource search method for peer network with node priority |
US20110167071A1 (en) * | 2010-01-05 | 2011-07-07 | O Wave Media Co., Ltd. | Method for scoring individual network competitiveness and network effect in an online social network |
CN102196461A (en) * | 2011-06-22 | 2011-09-21 | 韩山师范学院 | Evaluation method for importance of sensor network node |
CN102880799A (en) * | 2012-09-24 | 2013-01-16 | 西北工业大学 | Method for comprehensively evaluating importance of complicated network node based on multi-attribute decision-making |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
李琳,刘雅奇: "通信网节点重要性的多指标评价方法", 《海军工程大学学报》 * |
谢琼瑶,邓长虹,赵红生,翁毅选: "基于有权网络模型的电力网节点重要度评估", 《电力系统自动化》 * |
Cited By (27)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103957114A (en) * | 2014-02-24 | 2014-07-30 | 国家电网公司 | Network survivability assessment method based on variation coefficient |
CN103906271B (en) * | 2014-04-21 | 2017-06-13 | 西安电子科技大学 | Key node measuring method in Ad Hoc networks |
CN103906271A (en) * | 2014-04-21 | 2014-07-02 | 西安电子科技大学 | Method for measuring key nodes in Ad Hoc network |
CN104579867B (en) * | 2014-11-28 | 2016-06-08 | 广东电网有限责任公司电力调度控制中心 | Based on the power communication network construction process of node aggregation coefficient |
CN104363127A (en) * | 2014-11-28 | 2015-02-18 | 广东电网有限责任公司电力调度控制中心 | Method for building electric power communication network based on grid influence factor |
CN104579867A (en) * | 2014-11-28 | 2015-04-29 | 广东电网有限责任公司电力调度控制中心 | Electric power communication network construction method based on node aggregation coefficients |
CN104811397A (en) * | 2015-03-24 | 2015-07-29 | 中国人民解放军国防科学技术大学 | Method for estimating node significance of complex network based on node state evolution |
CN104992266A (en) * | 2015-06-15 | 2015-10-21 | 广东电网有限责任公司电力调度控制中心 | Method of determining power grid node importance degree and system thereof |
CN104915504A (en) * | 2015-06-18 | 2015-09-16 | 莫毓昌 | BFS strategy improvement method used for novel calculation network reliability evaluation |
CN105550191A (en) * | 2015-07-10 | 2016-05-04 | 成都信息工程大学 | Node importance ranking method for multi-layer network |
CN106375104A (en) * | 2015-07-24 | 2017-02-01 | 国家电网公司 | Method of recognizing key point of power communication network |
CN106375104B (en) * | 2015-07-24 | 2019-10-15 | 国家电网公司 | A kind of powerline network key point knowledge method for distinguishing |
CN105306540A (en) * | 2015-09-24 | 2016-02-03 | 华东师范大学 | Method for obtaining top k nodes with maximum influence in social network |
CN105490840A (en) * | 2015-11-26 | 2016-04-13 | 电子科技大学 | Fault diagnosis test point selection method based on network topological structure |
CN105871594A (en) * | 2016-03-22 | 2016-08-17 | 华北电力大学(保定) | Method for calculating important degrees of nodes of power communication network |
CN107846293B (en) * | 2016-09-19 | 2020-12-01 | 中国电信股份有限公司 | IPv6 communication capacity calculation method and device |
CN107846293A (en) * | 2016-09-19 | 2018-03-27 | 中国电信股份有限公司 | The computational methods and device of IPv6 communication capacities |
CN107070995A (en) * | 2017-03-16 | 2017-08-18 | 中国科学院信息工程研究所 | The caching method and device of a kind of content center network |
CN107395393A (en) * | 2017-06-14 | 2017-11-24 | 华北电力大学 | A kind of power communication backbone network node evaluation method of automatic weight coefficient |
CN108399491A (en) * | 2018-02-02 | 2018-08-14 | 浙江工业大学 | A kind of employee's diversity ranking method based on network |
CN108399491B (en) * | 2018-02-02 | 2021-10-29 | 浙江工业大学 | Employee diversity ordering method based on network graph |
CN109104307B (en) * | 2018-07-27 | 2021-06-04 | 电子科技大学 | Key node sensing method of dynamic data link network |
CN109104307A (en) * | 2018-07-27 | 2018-12-28 | 电子科技大学 | A kind of key node cognitive method of dynamic data chain network |
CN109756422A (en) * | 2019-03-27 | 2019-05-14 | 山东浪潮云信息技术有限公司 | A kind of forwarding routing node choosing method |
CN111800201A (en) * | 2020-06-24 | 2020-10-20 | 西北工业大学 | Method for identifying key nodes of Sink node underwater acoustic sensor network |
CN114637236A (en) * | 2022-03-03 | 2022-06-17 | 国网电力科学研究院有限公司 | Time delay calculation method and device based on hybrid frequency stabilization control system and storage medium |
CN114637236B (en) * | 2022-03-03 | 2024-07-19 | 国网电力科学研究院有限公司 | Time delay calculation method, device and storage medium based on hybrid frequency stability control system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN103476051B (en) | 2016-04-13 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN103476051A (en) | Method for evaluating importance of nodes in communication network | |
CN102571954B (en) | Complex network clustering method based on key influence of nodes | |
CN106850254B (en) | Method for identifying key nodes in power communication network | |
CN102810113B (en) | A kind of mixed type clustering method for complex network | |
CN104408667B (en) | Method and system for comprehensively evaluating power quality | |
CN102880799A (en) | Method for comprehensively evaluating importance of complicated network node based on multi-attribute decision-making | |
CN103607320B (en) | Power telecom network survivability evaluation methodology | |
CN107194498B (en) | Hydrologic monitoring network optimization method | |
CN104579868A (en) | Construction method of electric powder communication network based on node importance | |
CN108090677B (en) | Reliability evaluation method for key infrastructure | |
CN107483487B (en) | TOPSIS-based multi-dimensional network security measurement method | |
CN104217579B (en) | Transportation network key road segment searching method based on section sub-network redundancy | |
Zhang et al. | Identifying node importance by combining betweenness centrality and katz centrality | |
CN106843100A (en) | Substation secondary device running status level determination method and device | |
CN112149873A (en) | Low-voltage transformer area line loss reasonable interval prediction method based on deep learning | |
CN109670611A (en) | A kind of power information system method for diagnosing faults and device | |
CN114037199A (en) | Urban street network toughness quantitative measurement method | |
CN113224748A (en) | Method for calculating line loss of low-voltage distribution station area | |
CN104967114A (en) | Power grid load real-time digital modeling method and system | |
Shahpari et al. | Vulnerability analysis of power grid with the network science approach based on actual grid characteristics: A case study in Iran | |
CN112989272B (en) | Community discovery algorithm based on local path | |
Benzerga et al. | Low-voltage network topology and impedance identification using smart meter measurements | |
CN105139157A (en) | Enterprise management method and system based on energy data | |
CN111105145B (en) | Power grid survivability evaluation method considering intermittent energy | |
CN115622041A (en) | Comprehensive performance evaluation method of power distribution network system based on complex network |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
C14 | Grant of patent or utility model | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee | ||
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20160413 Termination date: 20210911 |