CN103473443A - Waste treatment industry environmental risk source evaluation method for waste treatment industry - Google Patents
Waste treatment industry environmental risk source evaluation method for waste treatment industry Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN103473443A CN103473443A CN2013103786261A CN201310378626A CN103473443A CN 103473443 A CN103473443 A CN 103473443A CN 2013103786261 A CN2013103786261 A CN 2013103786261A CN 201310378626 A CN201310378626 A CN 201310378626A CN 103473443 A CN103473443 A CN 103473443A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- risk
- value
- refuse
- unit
- abfallwirtschaft
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 25
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 20
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 14
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 37
- 239000003344 environmental pollutant Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 231100000719 pollutant Toxicity 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 claims description 37
- 208000028659 discharge Diseases 0.000 claims description 19
- 239000010813 municipal solid waste Substances 0.000 claims description 18
- 238000013178 mathematical model Methods 0.000 claims description 16
- 239000002920 hazardous waste Substances 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000002351 wastewater Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 231100000290 environmental risk assessment Toxicity 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000011112 process operation Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000002912 waste gas Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000013316 zoning Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000003673 groundwater Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000010802 sludge Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052721 tungsten Inorganic materials 0.000 abstract description 3
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 abstract 1
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 3
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000002910 solid waste Substances 0.000 description 2
- ZOXJGFHDIHLPTG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Boron Chemical compound [B] ZOXJGFHDIHLPTG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Fe2+ Chemical compound [Fe+2] CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000003723 Smelting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfur Chemical group [S] NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000010828 animal waste Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010884 boiler slag Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052796 boron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002361 compost Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000356 contaminant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000428 dust Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010793 electronic waste Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010881 fly ash Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910001385 heavy metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010985 leather Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910044991 metal oxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000004706 metal oxides Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 1
- QJGQUHMNIGDVPM-UHFFFAOYSA-N nitrogen group Chemical group [N] QJGQUHMNIGDVPM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000010893 paper waste Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011505 plaster Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012502 risk assessment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000010865 sewage Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052717 sulfur Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011593 sulfur Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002023 wood Substances 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a waste treatment industry environmental risk source evaluation method. The method includes the steps of firstly, determining waste treatment industry environmental risk factors; secondly, building mathematic models of the risks, and calculating to obtain risk values; thirdly, directly adding the risk values to obtain risk values of waste treatment industry total environmental risk sources; fourthly, grading the risk sources according to the risk values of waste treatment industry total environmental risk sources according to needs, and correspondingly managing different risk grades. The evaluation method has the advantages that the problem that no current systematic evaluation aims at waste treatment industry environmental risk sources, waste treatment risks, secondary pollutant emission risks, incineration process risks, burying process risks and management risks, which represent risk levels of the waste treatment industry environmental risk sources, are extracted, W, P, F, T and G are used as independent variables to build evaluation functions in environmental risk evaluation, and the method is highly adaptive, dynamic, and highly accurate.
Description
Technical field
The invention belongs to environmental risk impact evaluation technical field, be specifically related to a kind of Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source evaluation method.
Background technology
Urban health management 8022 and hazardous waste improvement 8024 are the sub-industries in environmental improvement 802, belong to the N class industry in the industrial sectors of national economy classification.City garbage specification, landfill, burning, compost, biology and other party method thereof in the urban environmental hygiene management administered (refuse landfill, garbage burning factory) and administered with hazardous waste the processing disposing task of mainly being engaged in house refuse and hazardous waste, environmental risk is mainly the discharge of feature pollutant, and the discharge that likely produces bioxin, heavy metal contaminants in rubbish, hazardous waste processing procedure causes the secondary pollution phenomenon.
In prior art; except simply mentioning outside the evaluation method about Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source in document " city life garbage landfill health risk assessment method; Zhang Hongjian; basis and applied basic research radiation protection and environmental protection ", the applicant does not find the evaluation method that sums up Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source of other open source literature system.
Summary of the invention
The objective of the invention is in order to overcome the deficiencies in the prior art, for the Abfallwirtschaft industry provides a kind of risk source evaluation method, this method has mainly been extracted the refuse that characterizes its risk level and has been processed risk, secondary pollution discharge risk, burning process risk, landfill process risk and managing risk, take W, P, F, T, G as independent variable builds evaluation function in environmental risk assessment, there is strong adaptability, dynamic change, pin-point accuracy.
To achieve these goals, the present invention is achieved by the following technical solutions:
A kind of Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source evaluation method, comprise the steps:
(1) determine Abfallwirtschaft industry environmental risk factor, comprising: refuse is processed risk, secondary pollution discharge risk, burning process risk, landfill process risk and managing risk;
(2) set up the mathematical model of each environmental risk factor, by calculating value-at-risk;
(3) the direct stack of the value-at-risk of each environmental risk factor is obtained to the value-at-risk of Abfallwirtschaft industry total environment risk source, computation model is:
I＝W+P+(F/T)+(G
1+G
2)
In formula: I---the value-at-risk of Abfallwirtschaft industry total environment risk source;
W---refuse is processed value-at-risk;
P---secondary pollution discharge value-at-risk, constant, dimensionless;
F---burning process value-at-risk, constant, dimensionless;
T---landfill process value-at-risk, constant, dimensionless;
G
1---refuse landfill managing risk value;
G
2---garbage burning factory managing risk value;
(4) according to the value-at-risk of total environment risk source by risk source divided rank as required, and different risk class is carried out to corresponding management.
The mathematical model that the above refuse is processed risk factors is:
In formula: r
1---hazardous waste harmfulness conversion factor, assignment 1;
R
2---the harmfulness conversion factor of general refuse, assignment 0.3;
Q
1---the year of hazardous waste is processed disposal amount, the t of unit;
Q
2---the year of general refuse is processed disposal amount, the t of unit.
The above hazardous waste is the material in " national Hazardous Waste List ", general refuse is for comprising household garbage, TRADE REFUSE, office rubbish and industrial solid wastes, general industrial solid waste has the smelting refuse, flyash, boiler slag, gangue, mine tailing, sulfur-bearing debirs (desulfurated plaster), electronic waste, nitrogenous debirs, the calcic refuse, boron mud, red mud, salt slurry, the metal oxide refuse, inorganic wastewater mud, organic wastewater mud, animal residue, grain and food processing refuse, the leather refuse, the Chinese medicine residue, mineral type refuse, septic tank bed mud and animal wastes, industrial dust, non-ferrous metal, scrap iron and steel, wood chip, waste paper, waste plastics, scrap rubber, other refuses.
The mathematical model of the above secondary pollution discharge risk factors is:
In formula: P
w---discharge of wastewater value-at-risk, constant, dimensionless;
P
g---toxic emission value-at-risk, constant, dimensionless;
P
s---waste sludge discharge value-at-risk, constant, dimensionless;
N
w---the number of major pollutants in waste water;
N
g---the number of major pollutants in waste gas;
C
i---the concentration of emission of waste water major pollutants, the mg/L of unit;
C
0---such Pollutant emission concentration of stipulating in the regional function zoning, the mg/L of unit;
M
i---the year discharge quality of waste gas major pollutants, the t of unit;
M
0---such pollutant emission quality of stipulating in the regional function zoning, the t of unit;
M
s---the year discharge quality of waste residue major pollutants, the t of unit.
The mathematical model of the above burning process risk factors is:
In formula: m
1---burning process day is processed refuse amount, the t of unit;
The actual useful year of y---incinerator, unit is year;
Y
0---the design life of incinerator, unit is year;
The conversion factor of the temperature value of t---reactor, dimensionless, temperature of reaction kettle is divided into below-150 ℃ ,-150 ℃～50 ℃ ,-50 ℃～0 ℃, 0 ℃～50 ℃, 50 ℃～150 ℃, 150 ℃～250 ℃, 6 intervals, assignment 1.0,0.75,0.5,0.25,0.5,0.75,1.0 respectively more than 250 ℃.
The mathematical model of the above landfill process risk factors is:
In formula: m
2---day in landfill process year is processed refuse amount, the t of unit;
The actual use storage capacity of V---landfill factory, unit is ten thousand stere;
V
0---storage capacity is used in the design of landfill factory, and unit is ten thousand stere;
The above managing risk factor comprises enterprise level managing risk factor and apparatus safety management risk factors, and the mathematical model of the value-at-risk of described enterprise level managing risk factor is:
In=S+O+A+C, the value of In is [0,1];
In formula: S---the safety management value;
O---process operation rules and system value;
A---risk management system and accident record value;
C---emergency preplan/emergency drilling value;
Described safety management value, comprise three indexs of personal security managerial accountability, safety education and training and safety inspection, and three all possess is 0 minute, and possessing two is 0.09, possesses one and be 0.18, three all not possess be 0.25;
Definite method of described process operation rules and system value, be to have the Processes and apparatus operation instructions and working specification is 0 minute, and relevant rules and regulations are 0.25 minute;
Described risk management system and accident record value, comprise environmental risk assessment (or the special chapter of the risk in environmental impact assessment) and detailed two indexs of accident record (culprit, damage sequence, experience and lessons), two all possess is 0 minute, only have one 0.15 minute, all do nothing 0.25 minute for two;
Definite method of described emergency preplan/emergency drilling value, enterprise can show emergency preplan and regularly carry out emergency drilling is 0 minute, only can carry out one is 0.15 minute, all does nothing 0.25 minute for two;
Described apparatus safety management risk factors comprise refuse landfill apparatus safety management risk factors and garbage burning factory apparatus safety management risk factors,
The mathematical model of described refuse landfill apparatus safety management risk factors is:
E
1=1-n
1/4
In formula: E
1---refuse landfill apparatus safety management value-at-risk;
N
1---the safety feature number that refuse landfill possesses comprises four indexs of seepage control system, leachate collection system, gas guide system and rainwater and groundwater deflector;
The mathematical model of described garbage burning factory apparatus safety management risk factors is:
E
2=1-n
2/4
In formula: E
2---garbage burning factory apparatus safety management value-at-risk;
N
2---the safety feature number that garbage burning factory possesses comprises in temperature controller, explosion-protection equipment, incinerator that material proportion detects, urgent cooling/four of lugs index.
The above refuse landfill managing risk value is: G
1=(In+E
1)/2; Described garbage burning factory managing risk value is G
2=(In+E
2)/2.
Size according to the value-at-risk of total environment risk source in the above step (4) is set risk class: according to environment risk source I codomain, be to be divided into the I level in 0<I≤10000 scopes the time; Environment risk source I codomain is that 10000<I≤50000 o'clock are divided into the II level; Environment risk source I codomain is divided into the III level while being 50000<I.
When risk class is the I level, management expectancy now is that risk source is carried out to routine management;
When risk class is the II level, management expectancy now is that risk source is carried out to tighten management, and carries out management accounts;
When risk class is the III level, management expectancy now is that risk source is carried out to tighten management, and is equipped with corresponding monitor and control facility and emergency disposal scheme and reserve supply.
Compared with prior art, the invention has the beneficial effects as follows:
1. this method solves at present and the planless evaluation problem for Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source, a kind of evaluation method is provided, mainly extract the refuse that characterizes its risk level and processed risk, secondary pollution discharge risk, burning process risk, landfill process risk and managing risk, take W, P, F, T, G as independent variable builds evaluation function in environmental risk assessment, there is strong adaptability, dynamic change, pin-point accuracy.
2. realize Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source systematization, standardization, scientific consider evaluation.
Embodiment
Below in conjunction with embodiment, the present invention is described in further detail, but embodiments of the present invention are not limited to the scope that embodiment means.
Utilize the inventive method to carry out environmental risk assessment to the Liuzhou city, Guangxi province destructor plant, the Environment risk factors, set up index system.The correlation circumstance of this destructor plant is as shown in table 1:
Table 1
This Sewage Plant total environment value-at-risk:
I=W+P+ (F/T)+G=32000+667+6+20000+1.5/1000+0.615=52674, risk class is the III rank, management expectancy now is that risk source is carried out to tighten management, and is equipped with corresponding monitor and control facility and emergency disposal scheme and reserve supply.
The above embodiment of the present invention scheme is only can not limit the present invention to explanation of the present invention, pointed out design parameter in the inventive method calculating in claim, and the scope of parameter of the present invention is not pointed out in above-mentioned explanation, therefore, in the implication suitable with claims of the present invention and any change in scope, all be considered to be in the scope that is included in claims.
Claims (7)
1. an Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source evaluation method, is characterized in that, comprises the steps:
(1) determine Abfallwirtschaft industry environmental risk factor, comprising: refuse is processed risk, secondary pollution discharge risk, burning process risk, landfill process risk and managing risk;
(2) set up the mathematical model of each environmental risk factor, by calculating value-at-risk;
(3) the direct stack of the value-at-risk of each environmental risk factor is obtained to the value-at-risk of Abfallwirtschaft industry total environment risk source, computation model is:
I＝W+P+(F/T)+(G
1+G
2)
In formula: I---the value-at-risk of Abfallwirtschaft industry total environment risk source;
W---refuse is processed value-at-risk;
P---secondary pollution discharge value-at-risk, constant, dimensionless;
F---burning process value-at-risk, constant, dimensionless;
T---landfill process value-at-risk, constant, dimensionless;
G
1---refuse landfill managing risk value;
G
2---garbage burning factory managing risk value;
(4) according to the value-at-risk of total environment risk source by risk source divided rank as required, and different risk class is carried out to corresponding management.
2. Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source evaluation method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: the mathematical model that described refuse is processed risk factors is:
In formula: r
1---hazardous waste harmfulness conversion factor, assignment 1;
R
2---the harmfulness conversion factor of general refuse, assignment 0.3;
Q
1---the year of hazardous waste is processed disposal amount, the t of unit;
Q
2---the year of general refuse is processed disposal amount, the t of unit.
3. Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source evaluation method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: the mathematical model of described secondary pollution discharge risk factors is:
In formula: P
w---discharge of wastewater value-at-risk, constant, dimensionless;
P
g---toxic emission value-at-risk, constant, dimensionless;
P
s---waste sludge discharge value-at-risk, constant, dimensionless;
N
w---the number of major pollutants in waste water;
N
g---the number of major pollutants in waste gas;
C
i---the concentration of emission of waste water major pollutants, the mg/L of unit;
C
0---such Pollutant emission concentration of stipulating in the regional function zoning, the mg/L of unit;
M
i---the year discharge quality of waste gas major pollutants, the t of unit;
M
0---this discharge quality of stipulating in the regional function zoning, the t of unit in pollutant year;
M
s---the year discharge quality of waste residue major pollutants, the t of unit.
4. Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source evaluation method according to claim 1, it is characterized in that: the mathematical model of described burning process risk factors is:
In formula: m
1---burning process day is processed refuse amount, the t of unit;
The actual useful year of y---incinerator, unit is year;
Y
0---the design life of incinerator, unit is year;
The conversion factor of the temperature value of t---reactor, dimensionless, temperature of reaction kettle is divided into below-150 ℃ ,-150 ℃～50 ℃ ,-50 ℃～0 ℃, 0 ℃～50 ℃, 50 ℃～150 ℃, 150 ℃～250 ℃, 6 intervals, assignment 1.0,0.75,0.5,0.25,0.5,0.75,1.0 respectively more than 250 ℃.
5. Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source evaluation method according to claim 1, it is characterized in that: the mathematical model of described landfill process risk factors is:
In formula: m
2---landfill process year is processed refuse amount, the t of unit;
The actual use storage capacity of V---landfill factory, unit is ten thousand stere;
V
0---storage capacity is used in the design of landfill factory, and unit is ten thousand stere.
6. Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source evaluation method according to claim 1, it is characterized in that: described managing risk factor comprises enterprise level managing risk factor and apparatus safety management risk factors, and the mathematical model of the value-at-risk of described enterprise level managing risk factor is:
In=S+O+A+C, the value of In is [0,1];
In formula: S---the safety management value;
O---process operation rules and system value;
A---risk management system and accident record value;
C---emergency preplan/emergency drilling value;
Described safety management value, comprise three indexs of personal security managerial accountability, safety education and training and safety inspection, and three all possess is 0 minute, and possessing two is 0.09, possesses one and be 0.18, three all not possess be 0.25;
Definite method of described process operation rules and system value, be to have the Processes and apparatus operation instructions and working specification is 0 minute, and relevant rules and regulations are 0.25 minute;
Described risk management system and accident record value, comprise environmental risk assessment and detailed two indexs of accident record, and two all possess is 0 minute, only have one 0.15 minute, all do nothing 0.25 minute for two;
Definite method of described emergency preplan/emergency drilling value, enterprise can show emergency preplan and regularly carry out emergency drilling is 0 minute, only can carry out one is 0.15 minute, all does nothing 0.25 minute for two;
Described apparatus safety management risk factors comprise refuse landfill apparatus safety management risk factors and garbage burning factory apparatus safety management risk factors,
The mathematical model of described refuse landfill apparatus safety management risk factors is:
E
1=1-n
1/4
In formula: E
1---refuse landfill apparatus safety management value-at-risk;
N
1---the safety feature number that refuse landfill possesses comprises four indexs of seepage control system, leachate collection system, gas guide system and rainwater and groundwater deflector;
The mathematical model of described garbage burning factory apparatus safety management risk factors is:
E
2=1-n
2/4
In formula: E
2---garbage burning factory apparatus safety management value-at-risk;
N
2---the safety feature number that garbage burning factory possesses comprises in temperature controller, explosion-protection equipment, incinerator that material proportion detects, urgent cooling/four of lugs index.
7. Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source evaluation method according to claim 6, it is characterized in that: described refuse landfill managing risk value is: G
1=(In+E
1)/2; Described garbage burning factory managing risk value is G
2=(In+E
2)/2.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201310378626.1A CN103473443B (en) | 2013-08-27 | 2013-08-27 | Waste treatment industry environmental risk source evaluation method for waste treatment industry |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201310378626.1A CN103473443B (en) | 2013-08-27 | 2013-08-27 | Waste treatment industry environmental risk source evaluation method for waste treatment industry |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN103473443A true CN103473443A (en) | 2013-12-25 |
| CN103473443B CN103473443B (en) | 2017-06-06 |
Family
ID=49798290
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201310378626.1A Active CN103473443B (en) | 2013-08-27 | 2013-08-27 | Waste treatment industry environmental risk source evaluation method for waste treatment industry |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN103473443B (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109308558A (en) * | 2017-11-16 | 2019-02-05 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | A kind of analysis method for chemical company's water body environment risk |
| CN109345074A (en) * | 2018-09-03 | 2019-02-15 | 中国辐射防护研究院 | A kind of method high-level waste geology treatment public acceptance influence factor identification and evaluated |
| CN113516416A (en) * | 2021-08-11 | 2021-10-19 | 广西壮族自治区环境应急与事故调查中心 | Method, device, equipment and medium for evaluating cement kiln waste disposal complete cycle |
| CN114677005A (en) * | 2022-03-23 | 2022-06-28 | 中海石油气电集团有限责任公司 | Semi-quantitative risk evaluation method and system for liquefied natural gas receiving station |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR20080088011A (en) * | 2007-03-28 | 2008-10-02 | 한국화학연구원 | Risk prediction system and method for integrated environment management, and a computer-readable recording medium on which the method can be implemented |
| CN101847180A (en) * | 2010-04-30 | 2010-09-29 | 中国环境科学研究院 | Atmosphere pollution risk source identification method |
| CN103065194A (en) * | 2012-11-13 | 2013-04-24 | 上海大学 | Method of hazardous waste emergency early warning and response through 3S technologies and system |
-
2013
- 2013-08-27 CN CN201310378626.1A patent/CN103473443B/en active Active
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR20080088011A (en) * | 2007-03-28 | 2008-10-02 | 한국화학연구원 | Risk prediction system and method for integrated environment management, and a computer-readable recording medium on which the method can be implemented |
| CN101847180A (en) * | 2010-04-30 | 2010-09-29 | 中国环境科学研究院 | Atmosphere pollution risk source identification method |
| CN103065194A (en) * | 2012-11-13 | 2013-04-24 | 上海大学 | Method of hazardous waste emergency early warning and response through 3S technologies and system |
Non-Patent Citations (4)
| Title |
|---|
| IRENA TWARDOWSKA, JADWIGA SZCZEPANSKA: "Solid waste: terminological and long-term environmental risk assessment problems exemplified in a power plant fly ash study", 《THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT》 * |
| REHAN SADIQ，TAHIR HUSAIN: "A fuzzy-based methodology for an aggregative environmental risk assessment: a case study of drilling waste", 《ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE》 * |
| 卢静: "危险废物集中处置企业环境风险评价研究", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库工程科技Ⅰ辑》 * |
| 孙鑫 等: "大宗工业固体废物污染源环境风险评价方法对比分析", 《矿冶》 * |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109308558A (en) * | 2017-11-16 | 2019-02-05 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | A kind of analysis method for chemical company's water body environment risk |
| CN109345074A (en) * | 2018-09-03 | 2019-02-15 | 中国辐射防护研究院 | A kind of method high-level waste geology treatment public acceptance influence factor identification and evaluated |
| CN113516416A (en) * | 2021-08-11 | 2021-10-19 | 广西壮族自治区环境应急与事故调查中心 | Method, device, equipment and medium for evaluating cement kiln waste disposal complete cycle |
| CN114677005A (en) * | 2022-03-23 | 2022-06-28 | 中海石油气电集团有限责任公司 | Semi-quantitative risk evaluation method and system for liquefied natural gas receiving station |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN103473443B (en) | 2017-06-06 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Christodoulou et al. | Overview of legislation on sewage sludge management in developed countries worldwide | |
| Yang et al. | Current state of sludge production, management, treatment and disposal in China | |
| Barakwan et al. | Characterization of alum sludge from surabaya water treatment plant, Indonesia | |
| Brunner et al. | Waste to energy–key element for sustainable waste management | |
| Kinman et al. | Gas enhancement techniques in landfill simulators | |
| CN103473443B (en) | Waste treatment industry environmental risk source evaluation method for waste treatment industry | |
| Shadi et al. | Characterization of stabilized leachate and evaluation of LPI from sanitary landfill in Penang, Malaysia | |
| Noerfitriyani et al. | Leachate characterization and performance evaluation of leachate treatment plant in Cipayung landfill, Indonesia | |
| Jumasheva et al. | Study on the Composition and Environmental Impact of Sewage Sludge | |
| Grisey et al. | Prolonged aerobic degradation of shredded and pre-composted municipal solid waste: report from a 21-year study of leachate quality characteristics | |
| Liu et al. | Concentrations and species of mercury in municipal sludge of selected Chinese cities and potential mercury emissions from sludge treatment and disposal | |
| Ogunwumi et al. | Perspective chapter: Industrial waste landfills | |
| Piao et al. | Evaluation of monthly environmental loads from municipal wastewater treatment plants operation using life cycle assessment | |
| Gupta et al. | Evaluation of the leachate composition and contamination potential of municipal solid waste landfill sites in Delhi | |
| Ciuła et al. | Environmental aspect of waste to energy installation: quality of waste generated by technology | |
| Manoj Kumar et al. | Characterization of leachate and groundwater in and around Saduperi municipal solid waste open dump site, Vellore District, Tamil Nadu, India | |
| Perera et al. | Treatment of landfill leachate using sequencing batch reactor | |
| Francis et al. | Impact of the disposal and utilization of Wupa wastewater treatment plant sludge on the environment | |
| Stoll et al. | Treatment and disposal of domestic sewage sludge and nightsoil sludge for Bangkok | |
| Stafilov et al. | Industrial hazardous waste in the Republic of Macedonia | |
| Herselman et al. | Guidelines for the utilisation and disposal of wastewater sludge | |
| Abdelmegeed | Optimisation of Sludge Management in EThekwini Municipality | |
| Christoulas et al. | Alternative schemes for the management of the sludge produced at Psyttalia WWTP | |
| Batsioula | Environmental impact assessment of municipal solid waste management | |
| Starostina | Environmental impact analysis of landfilling system in Irkutsk on basis of life cycle assessment method |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| CB03 | Change of inventor or designer information | ||
| CB03 | Change of inventor or designer information |
Inventor after: Ye Shufan Inventor after: Tang Qingchan Inventor after: Xue She Inventor after: Wang Qiangqiang Inventor after: Pan Xia Inventor after: Zhang Haixia Inventor before: Qin Zumao Inventor before: Liu Wei Inventor before: Yuan Zengwei Inventor before: Du Yiman Inventor before: He Jia Inventor before: Li Donge Inventor before: Liu Xiao Inventor before: Huang Yinong Inventor before: Huang Huafeng |
|
| TA01 | Transfer of patent application right | ||
| TA01 | Transfer of patent application right |
Effective date of registration: 20170323 Address after: 325000 Zhejiang City, the city of Wenzhou City Road, No. 525, building nine constant, room 2001, room 2002 Applicant after: Zhejiang China Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Address before: 545026 the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region hi tech Road, No. 1, science and Technology Industrial Park, layer 1005, No. 15, No. 10, Liuzhou Applicant before: Liuzhou Boyuan Huanke Science & Technology Co., Ltd. |
|
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |