CN103473443A - Waste treatment industry environmental risk source evaluation method for waste treatment industry - Google Patents

Waste treatment industry environmental risk source evaluation method for waste treatment industry Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN103473443A
CN103473443A CN2013103786261A CN201310378626A CN103473443A CN 103473443 A CN103473443 A CN 103473443A CN 2013103786261 A CN2013103786261 A CN 2013103786261A CN 201310378626 A CN201310378626 A CN 201310378626A CN 103473443 A CN103473443 A CN 103473443A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
risk
value
refuse
unit
abfallwirtschaft
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN2013103786261A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN103473443B (en
Inventor
覃祖茂
刘为
袁增伟
杜怡曼
何佳
李东娥
刘晓
黄益农
黄华峰
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Zhejiang China Environmental Technology Co., Ltd.
Original Assignee
LIUZHOU BOYUAN HUANKE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by LIUZHOU BOYUAN HUANKE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Co Ltd filed Critical LIUZHOU BOYUAN HUANKE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Co Ltd
Priority to CN201310378626.1A priority Critical patent/CN103473443B/en
Publication of CN103473443A publication Critical patent/CN103473443A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN103473443B publication Critical patent/CN103473443B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a waste treatment industry environmental risk source evaluation method. The method includes the steps of firstly, determining waste treatment industry environmental risk factors; secondly, building mathematic models of the risks, and calculating to obtain risk values; thirdly, directly adding the risk values to obtain risk values of waste treatment industry total environmental risk sources; fourthly, grading the risk sources according to the risk values of waste treatment industry total environmental risk sources according to needs, and correspondingly managing different risk grades. The evaluation method has the advantages that the problem that no current systematic evaluation aims at waste treatment industry environmental risk sources, waste treatment risks, secondary pollutant emission risks, incineration process risks, burying process risks and management risks, which represent risk levels of the waste treatment industry environmental risk sources, are extracted, W, P, F, T and G are used as independent variables to build evaluation functions in environmental risk evaluation, and the method is highly adaptive, dynamic, and highly accurate.

Description

Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source evaluation method
Technical field
The invention belongs to environmental risk impact evaluation technical field, be specifically related to a kind of Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source evaluation method.
Background technology
Urban health management 8022 and hazardous waste improvement 8024 are the sub-industries in environmental improvement 802, belong to the N class industry in the industrial sectors of national economy classification.City garbage specification, landfill, burning, compost, biology and other party method thereof in the urban environmental hygiene management administered (refuse landfill, garbage burning factory) and administered with hazardous waste the processing disposing task of mainly being engaged in house refuse and hazardous waste, environmental risk is mainly the discharge of feature pollutant, and the discharge that likely produces bioxin, heavy metal contaminants in rubbish, hazardous waste processing procedure causes the secondary pollution phenomenon.
In prior art; except simply mentioning outside the evaluation method about Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source in document " city life garbage landfill health risk assessment method; Zhang Hongjian; basis and applied basic research radiation protection and environmental protection ", the applicant does not find the evaluation method that sums up Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source of other open source literature system.
Summary of the invention
The objective of the invention is in order to overcome the deficiencies in the prior art, for the Abfallwirtschaft industry provides a kind of risk source evaluation method, this method has mainly been extracted the refuse that characterizes its risk level and has been processed risk, secondary pollution discharge risk, burning process risk, landfill process risk and managing risk, take W, P, F, T, G as independent variable builds evaluation function in environmental risk assessment, there is strong adaptability, dynamic change, pin-point accuracy.
To achieve these goals, the present invention is achieved by the following technical solutions:
A kind of Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source evaluation method, comprise the steps:
(1) determine Abfallwirtschaft industry environmental risk factor, comprising: refuse is processed risk, secondary pollution discharge risk, burning process risk, landfill process risk and managing risk;
(2) set up the mathematical model of each environmental risk factor, by calculating value-at-risk;
(3) the direct stack of the value-at-risk of each environmental risk factor is obtained to the value-at-risk of Abfallwirtschaft industry total environment risk source, computation model is:
I=W+P+(F/T)+(G 1+G 2)
In formula: I---the value-at-risk of Abfallwirtschaft industry total environment risk source;
W---refuse is processed value-at-risk;
P---secondary pollution discharge value-at-risk, constant, dimensionless;
F---burning process value-at-risk, constant, dimensionless;
T---landfill process value-at-risk, constant, dimensionless;
G 1---refuse landfill managing risk value;
G 2---garbage burning factory managing risk value;
(4) according to the value-at-risk of total environment risk source by risk source divided rank as required, and different risk class is carried out to corresponding management.
The mathematical model that the above refuse is processed risk factors is:
W = Σ i = 1 n ( r 1 * Q 1 + r 2 * Q 2 )
In formula: r 1---hazardous waste harmfulness conversion factor, assignment 1;
R 2---the harmfulness conversion factor of general refuse, assignment 0.3;
Q 1---the year of hazardous waste is processed disposal amount, the t of unit;
Q 2---the year of general refuse is processed disposal amount, the t of unit.
The above hazardous waste is the material in " national Hazardous Waste List ", general refuse is for comprising household garbage, TRADE REFUSE, office rubbish and industrial solid wastes, general industrial solid waste has the smelting refuse, flyash, boiler slag, gangue, mine tailing, sulfur-bearing debirs (desulfurated plaster), electronic waste, nitrogenous debirs, the calcic refuse, boron mud, red mud, salt slurry, the metal oxide refuse, inorganic wastewater mud, organic wastewater mud, animal residue, grain and food processing refuse, the leather refuse, the Chinese medicine residue, mineral type refuse, septic tank bed mud and animal wastes, industrial dust, non-ferrous metal, scrap iron and steel, wood chip, waste paper, waste plastics, scrap rubber, other refuses.
The mathematical model of the above secondary pollution discharge risk factors is:
P = P w + P g + P s = Σ i = 1 N w C i C 0 + Σ i = 1 N g m i m 0 + m s 5
In formula: P w---discharge of wastewater value-at-risk, constant, dimensionless;
P g---toxic emission value-at-risk, constant, dimensionless;
P s---waste sludge discharge value-at-risk, constant, dimensionless;
N w---the number of major pollutants in waste water;
N g---the number of major pollutants in waste gas;
C i---the concentration of emission of waste water major pollutants, the mg/L of unit;
C 0---such Pollutant emission concentration of stipulating in the regional function zoning, the mg/L of unit;
M i---the year discharge quality of waste gas major pollutants, the t of unit;
M 0---such pollutant emission quality of stipulating in the regional function zoning, the t of unit;
M s---the year discharge quality of waste residue major pollutants, the t of unit.
The mathematical model of the above burning process risk factors is:
F = m 1 * y y 0 * t
In formula: m 1---burning process day is processed refuse amount, the t of unit;
The actual useful year of y---incinerator, unit is year;
Y 0---the design life of incinerator, unit is year;
The conversion factor of the temperature value of t---reactor, dimensionless, temperature of reaction kettle is divided into below-150 ℃ ,-150 ℃~50 ℃ ,-50 ℃~0 ℃, 0 ℃~50 ℃, 50 ℃~150 ℃, 150 ℃~250 ℃, 6 intervals, assignment 1.0,0.75,0.5,0.25,0.5,0.75,1.0 respectively more than 250 ℃.
The mathematical model of the above landfill process risk factors is:
T = m 2 * V V 0
In formula: m 2---day in landfill process year is processed refuse amount, the t of unit;
The actual use storage capacity of V---landfill factory, unit is ten thousand stere;
V 0---storage capacity is used in the design of landfill factory, and unit is ten thousand stere;
The above managing risk factor comprises enterprise level managing risk factor and apparatus safety management risk factors, and the mathematical model of the value-at-risk of described enterprise level managing risk factor is:
In=S+O+A+C, the value of In is [0,1];
In formula: S---the safety management value;
O---process operation rules and system value;
A---risk management system and accident record value;
C---emergency preplan/emergency drilling value;
Described safety management value, comprise three indexs of personal security managerial accountability, safety education and training and safety inspection, and three all possess is 0 minute, and possessing two is 0.09, possesses one and be 0.18, three all not possess be 0.25;
Definite method of described process operation rules and system value, be to have the Processes and apparatus operation instructions and working specification is 0 minute, and relevant rules and regulations are 0.25 minute;
Described risk management system and accident record value, comprise environmental risk assessment (or the special chapter of the risk in environmental impact assessment) and detailed two indexs of accident record (culprit, damage sequence, experience and lessons), two all possess is 0 minute, only have one 0.15 minute, all do nothing 0.25 minute for two;
Definite method of described emergency preplan/emergency drilling value, enterprise can show emergency preplan and regularly carry out emergency drilling is 0 minute, only can carry out one is 0.15 minute, all does nothing 0.25 minute for two;
Described apparatus safety management risk factors comprise refuse landfill apparatus safety management risk factors and garbage burning factory apparatus safety management risk factors,
The mathematical model of described refuse landfill apparatus safety management risk factors is:
E 1=1-n 1/4
In formula: E 1---refuse landfill apparatus safety management value-at-risk;
N 1---the safety feature number that refuse landfill possesses comprises four indexs of seepage control system, leachate collection system, gas guide system and rainwater and groundwater deflector;
The mathematical model of described garbage burning factory apparatus safety management risk factors is:
E 2=1-n 2/4
In formula: E 2---garbage burning factory apparatus safety management value-at-risk;
N 2---the safety feature number that garbage burning factory possesses comprises in temperature controller, explosion-protection equipment, incinerator that material proportion detects, urgent cooling/four of lugs index.
The above refuse landfill managing risk value is: G 1=(In+E 1)/2; Described garbage burning factory managing risk value is G 2=(In+E 2)/2.
Size according to the value-at-risk of total environment risk source in the above step (4) is set risk class: according to environment risk source I codomain, be to be divided into the I level in 0<I≤10000 scopes the time; Environment risk source I codomain is that 10000<I≤50000 o'clock are divided into the II level; Environment risk source I codomain is divided into the III level while being 50000<I.
When risk class is the I level, management expectancy now is that risk source is carried out to routine management;
When risk class is the II level, management expectancy now is that risk source is carried out to tighten management, and carries out management accounts;
When risk class is the III level, management expectancy now is that risk source is carried out to tighten management, and is equipped with corresponding monitor and control facility and emergency disposal scheme and reserve supply.
Compared with prior art, the invention has the beneficial effects as follows:
1. this method solves at present and the planless evaluation problem for Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source, a kind of evaluation method is provided, mainly extract the refuse that characterizes its risk level and processed risk, secondary pollution discharge risk, burning process risk, landfill process risk and managing risk, take W, P, F, T, G as independent variable builds evaluation function in environmental risk assessment, there is strong adaptability, dynamic change, pin-point accuracy.
2. realize Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source systematization, standardization, scientific consider evaluation.
Embodiment
Below in conjunction with embodiment, the present invention is described in further detail, but embodiments of the present invention are not limited to the scope that embodiment means.
Utilize the inventive method to carry out environmental risk assessment to the Liuzhou city, Guangxi province destructor plant, the Environment risk factors, set up index system.The correlation circumstance of this destructor plant is as shown in table 1:
Table 1
Figure BDA0000372755530000051
This Sewage Plant total environment value-at-risk:
I=W+P+ (F/T)+G=32000+667+6+20000+1.5/1000+0.615=52674, risk class is the III rank, management expectancy now is that risk source is carried out to tighten management, and is equipped with corresponding monitor and control facility and emergency disposal scheme and reserve supply.
The above embodiment of the present invention scheme is only can not limit the present invention to explanation of the present invention, pointed out design parameter in the inventive method calculating in claim, and the scope of parameter of the present invention is not pointed out in above-mentioned explanation, therefore, in the implication suitable with claims of the present invention and any change in scope, all be considered to be in the scope that is included in claims.

Claims (7)

1. an Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source evaluation method, is characterized in that, comprises the steps:
(1) determine Abfallwirtschaft industry environmental risk factor, comprising: refuse is processed risk, secondary pollution discharge risk, burning process risk, landfill process risk and managing risk;
(2) set up the mathematical model of each environmental risk factor, by calculating value-at-risk;
(3) the direct stack of the value-at-risk of each environmental risk factor is obtained to the value-at-risk of Abfallwirtschaft industry total environment risk source, computation model is:
I=W+P+(F/T)+(G 1+G 2)
In formula: I---the value-at-risk of Abfallwirtschaft industry total environment risk source;
W---refuse is processed value-at-risk;
P---secondary pollution discharge value-at-risk, constant, dimensionless;
F---burning process value-at-risk, constant, dimensionless;
T---landfill process value-at-risk, constant, dimensionless;
G 1---refuse landfill managing risk value;
G 2---garbage burning factory managing risk value;
(4) according to the value-at-risk of total environment risk source by risk source divided rank as required, and different risk class is carried out to corresponding management.
2. Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source evaluation method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: the mathematical model that described refuse is processed risk factors is:
Figure FDA0000372755520000011
In formula: r 1---hazardous waste harmfulness conversion factor, assignment 1;
R 2---the harmfulness conversion factor of general refuse, assignment 0.3;
Q 1---the year of hazardous waste is processed disposal amount, the t of unit;
Q 2---the year of general refuse is processed disposal amount, the t of unit.
3. Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source evaluation method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: the mathematical model of described secondary pollution discharge risk factors is:
Figure FDA0000372755520000012
In formula: P w---discharge of wastewater value-at-risk, constant, dimensionless;
P g---toxic emission value-at-risk, constant, dimensionless;
P s---waste sludge discharge value-at-risk, constant, dimensionless;
N w---the number of major pollutants in waste water;
N g---the number of major pollutants in waste gas;
C i---the concentration of emission of waste water major pollutants, the mg/L of unit;
C 0---such Pollutant emission concentration of stipulating in the regional function zoning, the mg/L of unit;
M i---the year discharge quality of waste gas major pollutants, the t of unit;
M 0---this discharge quality of stipulating in the regional function zoning, the t of unit in pollutant year;
M s---the year discharge quality of waste residue major pollutants, the t of unit.
4. Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source evaluation method according to claim 1, it is characterized in that: the mathematical model of described burning process risk factors is:
Figure FDA0000372755520000021
In formula: m 1---burning process day is processed refuse amount, the t of unit;
The actual useful year of y---incinerator, unit is year;
Y 0---the design life of incinerator, unit is year;
The conversion factor of the temperature value of t---reactor, dimensionless, temperature of reaction kettle is divided into below-150 ℃ ,-150 ℃~50 ℃ ,-50 ℃~0 ℃, 0 ℃~50 ℃, 50 ℃~150 ℃, 150 ℃~250 ℃, 6 intervals, assignment 1.0,0.75,0.5,0.25,0.5,0.75,1.0 respectively more than 250 ℃.
5. Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source evaluation method according to claim 1, it is characterized in that: the mathematical model of described landfill process risk factors is:
Figure FDA0000372755520000022
In formula: m 2---landfill process year is processed refuse amount, the t of unit;
The actual use storage capacity of V---landfill factory, unit is ten thousand stere;
V 0---storage capacity is used in the design of landfill factory, and unit is ten thousand stere.
6. Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source evaluation method according to claim 1, it is characterized in that: described managing risk factor comprises enterprise level managing risk factor and apparatus safety management risk factors, and the mathematical model of the value-at-risk of described enterprise level managing risk factor is:
In=S+O+A+C, the value of In is [0,1];
In formula: S---the safety management value;
O---process operation rules and system value;
A---risk management system and accident record value;
C---emergency preplan/emergency drilling value;
Described safety management value, comprise three indexs of personal security managerial accountability, safety education and training and safety inspection, and three all possess is 0 minute, and possessing two is 0.09, possesses one and be 0.18, three all not possess be 0.25;
Definite method of described process operation rules and system value, be to have the Processes and apparatus operation instructions and working specification is 0 minute, and relevant rules and regulations are 0.25 minute;
Described risk management system and accident record value, comprise environmental risk assessment and detailed two indexs of accident record, and two all possess is 0 minute, only have one 0.15 minute, all do nothing 0.25 minute for two;
Definite method of described emergency preplan/emergency drilling value, enterprise can show emergency preplan and regularly carry out emergency drilling is 0 minute, only can carry out one is 0.15 minute, all does nothing 0.25 minute for two;
Described apparatus safety management risk factors comprise refuse landfill apparatus safety management risk factors and garbage burning factory apparatus safety management risk factors,
The mathematical model of described refuse landfill apparatus safety management risk factors is:
E 1=1-n 1/4
In formula: E 1---refuse landfill apparatus safety management value-at-risk;
N 1---the safety feature number that refuse landfill possesses comprises four indexs of seepage control system, leachate collection system, gas guide system and rainwater and groundwater deflector;
The mathematical model of described garbage burning factory apparatus safety management risk factors is:
E 2=1-n 2/4
In formula: E 2---garbage burning factory apparatus safety management value-at-risk;
N 2---the safety feature number that garbage burning factory possesses comprises in temperature controller, explosion-protection equipment, incinerator that material proportion detects, urgent cooling/four of lugs index.
7. Abfallwirtschaft industry environment risk source evaluation method according to claim 6, it is characterized in that: described refuse landfill managing risk value is: G 1=(In+E 1)/2; Described garbage burning factory managing risk value is G 2=(In+E 2)/2.
CN201310378626.1A 2013-08-27 2013-08-27 Waste treatment industry environmental risk source evaluation method for waste treatment industry Active CN103473443B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201310378626.1A CN103473443B (en) 2013-08-27 2013-08-27 Waste treatment industry environmental risk source evaluation method for waste treatment industry

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201310378626.1A CN103473443B (en) 2013-08-27 2013-08-27 Waste treatment industry environmental risk source evaluation method for waste treatment industry

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN103473443A true CN103473443A (en) 2013-12-25
CN103473443B CN103473443B (en) 2017-06-06

Family

ID=49798290

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201310378626.1A Active CN103473443B (en) 2013-08-27 2013-08-27 Waste treatment industry environmental risk source evaluation method for waste treatment industry

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN103473443B (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109308558A (en) * 2017-11-16 2019-02-05 中国石油化工股份有限公司 A kind of analysis method for chemical company's water body environment risk
CN109345074A (en) * 2018-09-03 2019-02-15 中国辐射防护研究院 A kind of method high-level waste geology treatment public acceptance influence factor identification and evaluated
CN113516416A (en) * 2021-08-11 2021-10-19 广西壮族自治区环境应急与事故调查中心 Method, device, equipment and medium for evaluating cement kiln waste disposal complete cycle

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20080088011A (en) * 2007-03-28 2008-10-02 한국화학연구원 Risk assessment system and method for integrated enviroment management, and computer-readable recording medium having program for the same
CN101847180A (en) * 2010-04-30 2010-09-29 中国环境科学研究院 Atmosphere pollution risk source identification method
CN103065194A (en) * 2012-11-13 2013-04-24 上海大学 Method of hazardous waste emergency early warning and response through 3S technologies and system

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20080088011A (en) * 2007-03-28 2008-10-02 한국화학연구원 Risk assessment system and method for integrated enviroment management, and computer-readable recording medium having program for the same
CN101847180A (en) * 2010-04-30 2010-09-29 中国环境科学研究院 Atmosphere pollution risk source identification method
CN103065194A (en) * 2012-11-13 2013-04-24 上海大学 Method of hazardous waste emergency early warning and response through 3S technologies and system

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
IRENA TWARDOWSKA, JADWIGA SZCZEPANSKA: "Solid waste: terminological and long-term environmental risk assessment problems exemplified in a power plant fly ash study", 《THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT》 *
REHAN SADIQ,TAHIR HUSAIN: "A fuzzy-based methodology for an aggregative environmental risk assessment: a case study of drilling waste", 《ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE》 *
卢静: "危险废物集中处置企业环境风险评价研究", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库工程科技Ⅰ辑》 *
孙鑫 等: "大宗工业固体废物污染源环境风险评价方法对比分析", 《矿冶》 *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109308558A (en) * 2017-11-16 2019-02-05 中国石油化工股份有限公司 A kind of analysis method for chemical company's water body environment risk
CN109345074A (en) * 2018-09-03 2019-02-15 中国辐射防护研究院 A kind of method high-level waste geology treatment public acceptance influence factor identification and evaluated
CN113516416A (en) * 2021-08-11 2021-10-19 广西壮族自治区环境应急与事故调查中心 Method, device, equipment and medium for evaluating cement kiln waste disposal complete cycle

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN103473443B (en) 2017-06-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Christodoulou et al. Overview of legislation on sewage sludge management in developed countries worldwide
Barakwan et al. Characterization of alum sludge from surabaya water treatment plant, Indonesia
Kinman et al. Gas enhancement techniques in landfill simulators
Narbuvayevna et al. Explore Ecological and Hygiene Assignment of Soil Contamination With Heavy Metals
Mohd-Salleh et al. Sustainability analysis on landfilling and evaluation of characteristics in landfill leachate: a case study
Shadi et al. Characterization of stabilized leachate and evaluation of LPI from sanitary landfill in Penang, Malaysia
CN103473443B (en) Waste treatment industry environmental risk source evaluation method for waste treatment industry
Grisey et al. Prolonged aerobic degradation of shredded and pre-composted municipal solid waste: report from a 21-year study of leachate quality characteristics
Jumasheva et al. Study on the Composition and Environmental Impact of Sewage Sludge
Liu et al. Concentrations and species of mercury in municipal sludge of selected Chinese cities and potential mercury emissions from sludge treatment and disposal
Piao et al. Evaluation of monthly environmental loads from municipal wastewater treatment plants operation using life cycle assessment
Ogunwumi et al. Perspective Chapter: Industrial Waste Landfills
Gupta et al. Evaluation of the leachate composition and contamination potential of municipal solid waste landfill sites in Delhi
Stoll et al. Treatment and disposal of domestic sewage sludge and nightsoil sludge for Bangkok
Xi et al. Optimization of solid waste conversion process and risk control of groundwater pollution
Ciuła et al. Environmental aspect of waste to energy installation: quality of waste generated by technology
Etim et al. Leachate quality characteristics: a case study of two industrial solid waste dumpsites
Francis et al. Impact of the disposal and utilization of Wupa wastewater treatment plant sludge on the environment
Antonucci et al. Environmental effects of advanced wastewater treatment at South Lake Tahoe
Stafilov et al. Industrial hazardous waste in the Republic of Macedonia
Herselman et al. Guidelines for the utilisation and disposal of wastewater sludge
Igwegbe et al. Sustainable municipal landfill leachate management: Current practices, challenges, and future directions
Bag et al. A study on estimating the leachate pollution index at the Ghazipur landfill site
Zaki et al. Temporal monitoring and effect of precipitation on the quality of leachate from the Greater Casablanca landfill in Morocco
Christoulas et al. Alternative schemes for the management of the sludge produced at Psyttalia WWTP

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
CB03 Change of inventor or designer information
CB03 Change of inventor or designer information

Inventor after: Ye Shufan

Inventor after: Tang Qingchan

Inventor after: Xue She

Inventor after: Wang Qiangqiang

Inventor after: Pan Xia

Inventor after: Zhang Haixia

Inventor before: Qin Zumao

Inventor before: Liu Wei

Inventor before: Yuan Zengwei

Inventor before: Du Yiman

Inventor before: He Jia

Inventor before: Li Donge

Inventor before: Liu Xiao

Inventor before: Huang Yinong

Inventor before: Huang Huafeng

TA01 Transfer of patent application right
TA01 Transfer of patent application right

Effective date of registration: 20170323

Address after: 325000 Zhejiang City, the city of Wenzhou City Road, No. 525, building nine constant, room 2001, room 2002

Applicant after: Zhejiang China Environmental Technology Co., Ltd.

Address before: 545026 the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region hi tech Road, No. 1, science and Technology Industrial Park, layer 1005, No. 15, No. 10, Liuzhou

Applicant before: Liuzhou Boyuan Huanke Science & Technology Co., Ltd.

GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant