CN103150481A - Computer-based realization method of cut set non-intersection in fault tree analysis - Google Patents
Computer-based realization method of cut set non-intersection in fault tree analysis Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN103150481A CN103150481A CN 201310102253 CN201310102253A CN103150481A CN 103150481 A CN103150481 A CN 103150481A CN 201310102253 CN201310102253 CN 201310102253 CN 201310102253 A CN201310102253 A CN 201310102253A CN 103150481 A CN103150481 A CN 103150481A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- minimal cut
- cut set
- event
- friendship
- computer
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a computer-based realization method for acquiring the minimal cut sets of a top event through the Boole function of a fault tree and carrying out non-intersection treatment on the minimal cut sets. The basic method of the non-intersection treatment comprises the steps of: dividing one event into the sum of subevents and complementary events thereof, and carrying out a plurality of such operation on intersecting events until non-intersection events are obtained through division. The computer-based realization method is realized by mapping the minimal cut sets into one set of n-dimensional vectors and defining an operation, corresponding to the intersection operation among the minimal cut sets, in the set. The computer-based realization method has the following characteristics that (1) as long as the minimal cut sets are coded, the coded minimal cut sets can be input into a computer and then subjected to the non-intersection treatment automatically by the computer, so that the automation degree is high, and no manual intervention is needed; and (2) the minimal cut set with the fewest bottom events is preferentially selected as the non-intersection minimal cut set, so that the number of the minimal cut sets is reduced after non-intersection treatment, and the top event failure probability is simpler to calculate.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates in a kind of fault tree analysis the not computer implemented method of friendship of cut set
Background technology
Fault tree analysis is assessment and a kind of standard method that improves reliability and security, is used widely in the fields such as aerospace, nuclear energy, electronics, electric power, chemical industry, railway, transportation and insurance.Early stage Fussell-Vesely algorithm and Semanderes algorithm can adopt boolean to absorb the minimal cut set that strategy obtains top event, and this is being feasible and effective aspect fault tree qualitative analysis.Yet, carry out quantitative test to fault tree, must be at first to the not friendship processing of minimal cut set of top event.Yet, to minimal cut set not the appearance of friendship processing to scold theorem be " NP " difficult problem, its main cause is that the identical bottom event in different cut sets may cause operand acutely to increase in the friendship union of top event, i.e. so-called " shot array " problem.Although early stage not friendship fault tree synthesis function can reduce operand to a certain extent, adopt the long-pending sum theorem of not friendship type to realize that it is loaded down with trivial details and time-consuming that cut set is not shipped the process of calculation.
In international reliability in 1996 and maintainability annual meeting, Joanne B.Dugan and Stacy A.Doyle and Roslyn M.Sinnamon and John D.Andrews have provided respectively the thinking of utilizing BDD to carry out fault tree analysis, for " shot array " problem that solves in fault tree analysis provides new outlet.Due to expression on its room and time with process the high efficiency of Boolean function, BDD is widely used in the aspect such as the logic function checking in large-scale Design of Digital System, comprehensive and model detection and day by day comes into one's own.Many scholars have carried out the research based on the fault tree analysis of BDD, and some achievements have been obtained, but the fault tree analysis based on BDD still exists many deficiencies and open question, at first be that bottom event index order is larger on the impact of BDD scale, also do not have at present a kind of method can solve sequencing problem, the fault tree module also needs manual analysis; Next be achievement method versatility poor,, operand is large, can not be fully by computer realization.
Method
Summary of the invention
The present invention aims to provide a kind of Boole function by fault tree and obtains the top event minimal cut set, and to the minimal cut set computer implemented method of friendship processing not.
The present invention has following features:
(1) obtain the minimal cut set of top event by the Boole function after; As long as these minimal cut sets are encoded, the input computing machine can be realized the not friendship processing of minimal cut set automatically by computing machine, and automaticity is high, does not need manual intervention;
(2) preferentially select the minimum minimal cut set of bottom event as not handing over minimal cut set, reduced the not friendship processing number of minimal cut set afterwards, make the calculating of top event failure probability simpler.
Description of drawings
Fig. 1 does not hand over the block diagram of changing handling procedure.
Embodiment
1. not friendship disposal route and convergence thereof
Suppose A
1, A
2..., A
nBe n bottom event, the Boole function of fault tree can be expressed as
F=B
1UB
2U…UB
N
Wherein
Be minimal cut set, N is the minimal cut set number,
Can be
Or
(
Opposite event), n
1, n
2... n
N∈ 1,2 ..., n}, F are top events. and replace the union of " ∪ " presentation of events with "+" when event is non-intersect.
For reducing operand and being convenient to fault analysis, minimal cut set should not make the quantity of cut set the least possible after the friendship processing, and in other words, the bottom event that consists of each cut set should be the least possible.Make n
m=min{n
1, n
2... n
N, wherein, m ∈ 1,2 ..., N} is got by the formula in theory of probability
B after the equation right-hand member in one
k∩ B
m' be the common factor of some bottom events or its opposite event, if some bottom events event opposite to it occurs simultaneously, B
k∩ B
m'=φ (empty set), otherwise B
k∩ B
m' remain minimal cut set.After removing empty set
Remain the union of minimal cut set, be designated as v
2, and note U
1=B
m,
F=U
1+V
2,
U wherein
1, V
2Mutually disjoint, V
2The union of minimal cut set. said process has been completed once not friendship processing, U
1Not hand over to change the event that processing obtains, V
2It is the event that not yet realizes not handing over change.
After the processing of above-mentioned not friendship, if V
1=φ, or V
1Only be comprised of a minimal cut set, the friendship process does not finish; If V
1The middle minimal cut set that comprises is more than 1, and repeating above-mentioned not friendship processing procedure can obtain
F=U
1+U
2+V
3
Usually, if r V after the friendship processing not
rThe minimal cut set that comprises is still more than 1,
F=U
1+U
2+…U
r+V
r+1
V wherein
rThe union of minimal cut set, and U
1, U
2..., U
r, V
r+1Mutually disjoint.
Due to cut set be all shape as
The union of some events, so U
1, U
2..., U
rIn all comprise at least a shape as
Event, and shape as
The number maximum 2 of event
nIndividual.Each time not after the friendship processing, the cut set that mutually disjoints and concentrate increase at least a shape as
Event, therefore when enough F must be expressed as the mutually disjointing union of cut set greatly time of friendship number of processes not.
2. the computer realization of friendship processing not
Therefore the fundamental operation of friendship processing is not exactly the calculation of shipping of bottom event or its opposite event and minimal cut set.For the common factor in after equation (2) right-hand member one
If have
Make
Can divide two kinds of situations this moment, namely
Perhaps
The previous case
Latter event
If
Consist of
Bottom event number ratio
Many 1, namely bottom event or its opposite event are not all the factor event in minimal cut set, and the result of shipping calculation is the common factor of bottom event and minimal cut set.
Realize the calculation of shipping with above-mentioned characteristic of bottom event or its opposite event and minimal cut set for computer, define an event
Mapping to the n-dimensional vector space
As follows:
Wherein
To arbitrarily
(x
1, x
2, x
n) ∈ P, defining a kind of computing, might as well be designated as
, make:
If x
i=0,
If x
i≠ 0, x
i=± 1 o'clock
Like this, the calculation of shipping of bottom event or its opposite event and minimal cut set just can be by mapping
With they be converted in P shape as
Vector and P in another vector
Computing.
Computing can also be generalized to (y arbitrarily
1, y
2..., y
n), (x
1, x
2..., x
n) ∈ P, i.e. definition
4. friendship handling procedure not
The friendship handling procedure is not as follows:
1) obtain the Boole function of top event according to fault tree, obtain thus all minimal cut sets, and change into corresponding n-dimensional vector collection, be designated as V
0, put i=0;
4) if V
i+1Middle vectorial number returns to 2 greater than 1);
5) if V
i+1In a vector is arranged, U
i+1=V
i+1Storage;
6) stop.
The block diagram of friendship handling procedure is not seen Fig. 1.
Claims (3)
1. not friendship and computer implemented method of cut set in a fault tree analysis, is characterized in that: supposition A
1, A
2..., A
nBe n the bottom event of top event F, the Boole function of fault tree can be expressed as F=B
1UB
2U ... UB
N, wherein N is the minimal cut set number,
Minimal cut set, n
1, n
2... n
N∈ 1,2 ..., n},
Can be
Or
(
Opposite event), method comprises two steps, i.e. not friendship and computer realization; In the friendship process for reducing operand and being convenient to fault analysis, the bottom event of making every effort to consist of each cut set is the least possible, therefore makes n
m=min{n
1, n
2... n
N, wherein, m ∈ 1,2 ..., N}, and F is divided into
Realize the not event of friendship; Repeat above-mentioned not friendship processing procedure r time, until V
r+1The minimal cut set number that comprises is not more than 1,
F=U
1+U
2+…U
r+V
r+1
If V
r+1≠ φ makes U
r+1=V
r+1, U
1, U
2..., U
r, U
r+1, otherwise U
1, U
2..., U
rDo not hand over minimal cut set for one group that is F.
2. not friendship and computer implemented method of cut set in fault tree analysis according to claim 1, its computer implemented method is: definition set
To set P={ (x
1, x
2..., x
n), x
i=1 ,-1,0, i=1,2 ..., the mapping of n}
As follows:
If x
i=0,
If x
i≠ 0, x
i=± 1 o'clock
To any
Definition
。
3. not friendship and computer implemented method of cut set in fault tree analysis according to claim 1, its computer implemented program is:
1) obtain the Boole function of top event according to fault tree, obtain thus all minimal cut sets, and change into corresponding n-dimensional vector collection, be designated as V
0, put i=0;
3) storage U
i, calculate
4) if V
i+1Middle vectorial number returns to 2 greater than 1);
5) if V
i+1In a vector is arranged, U
i+1=V
i+1Storage;
6) stop.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN 201310102253 CN103150481A (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2013-03-14 | Computer-based realization method of cut set non-intersection in fault tree analysis |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN 201310102253 CN103150481A (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2013-03-14 | Computer-based realization method of cut set non-intersection in fault tree analysis |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN103150481A true CN103150481A (en) | 2013-06-12 |
Family
ID=48548555
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN 201310102253 Pending CN103150481A (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2013-03-14 | Computer-based realization method of cut set non-intersection in fault tree analysis |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN103150481A (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105652805A (en) * | 2014-11-14 | 2016-06-08 | 中国科学院沈阳计算技术研究所有限公司 | Simplified-FTA-method-based numerical control device hardware safety protection method and apparatus |
CN107025172A (en) * | 2017-03-22 | 2017-08-08 | 厦门大学 | A kind of method for testing software based on probabilistic risk assessment |
CN107609325A (en) * | 2017-10-18 | 2018-01-19 | 中国航空无线电电子研究所 | The method that fault tree based on SAT solves minimal cut set |
US11347919B2 (en) * | 2018-12-18 | 2022-05-31 | Siemens Industry Software Nv | Computer-implemented method for generating a mixed-layer fault tree of a multi-component system combining different layers of abstraction |
-
2013
- 2013-03-14 CN CN 201310102253 patent/CN103150481A/en active Pending
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105652805A (en) * | 2014-11-14 | 2016-06-08 | 中国科学院沈阳计算技术研究所有限公司 | Simplified-FTA-method-based numerical control device hardware safety protection method and apparatus |
CN107025172A (en) * | 2017-03-22 | 2017-08-08 | 厦门大学 | A kind of method for testing software based on probabilistic risk assessment |
CN107025172B (en) * | 2017-03-22 | 2018-01-05 | 厦门大学 | A kind of method for testing software based on probabilistic risk assessment |
CN107609325A (en) * | 2017-10-18 | 2018-01-19 | 中国航空无线电电子研究所 | The method that fault tree based on SAT solves minimal cut set |
US11347919B2 (en) * | 2018-12-18 | 2022-05-31 | Siemens Industry Software Nv | Computer-implemented method for generating a mixed-layer fault tree of a multi-component system combining different layers of abstraction |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Gray et al. | All complete intersection Calabi-Yau four-folds | |
Burkard et al. | Assignment problems: revised reprint | |
Taylor et al. | Conic AC transmission system planning | |
Hosseinian et al. | A new linear programming method for weights generation and group decision making in the analytic hierarchy process | |
CN103150481A (en) | Computer-based realization method of cut set non-intersection in fault tree analysis | |
Ben Abdallah et al. | Anomalous diffusion limit for kinetic equations with degenerate collision frequency | |
CN105046574A (en) | Black-start scheme evaluation method | |
CN105480737B (en) | Three-dimensional vanning scheme generation method based on three step Dynamic Programmings | |
Chattopadhyay et al. | Extracting Jacobi Structures in Reeb Spaces. | |
Shi et al. | Graph based power flow calculation for energy management system | |
CN102799960A (en) | Parallel operation flow anomaly detection method oriented to data model | |
Holweck et al. | Singularity of type D4 arising from four-qubit systems | |
Li et al. | ChatTwin: toward automated digital twin generation for data center via large language models | |
Holweck et al. | Three-qutrit entanglement and simple singularities | |
Campoamor-Stursberg et al. | Symmetry preserving discretization of ordinary differential equations. Large symmetry groups and higher order equations | |
WO2010095418A1 (en) | Design workflow construction device, design workflow construction method, design system, design method, design workflow construction program, and computer readable recording medium on which design workflow construction program is recorded | |
Lin et al. | Hunting for dynamical supersymmetry breaking in theories that S-confine | |
Goubault et al. | Future path-components in directed topology | |
Huang et al. | Decision-making method of reconfigurable manufacturing system's reconfiguration timing based on catastrophe theory | |
Zhang et al. | Product manufacturing process similarity measure based on attributed graph matching | |
Coley et al. | Basis for scalar curvature invariants in three dimensions | |
Fleites et al. | Large-Scale Correlation-Based Semantic Classification Using MapReduce. | |
Eisenstat | Equivalence of Krylov subspace methods for skew-symmetric linear systems | |
Lombard | Honey from the hives: A theoretical and computational exploration of combinatorial hives | |
Moroianu | Higher transgressions of the Pfaffian |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
C02 | Deemed withdrawal of patent application after publication (patent law 2001) | ||
WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20130612 |