CN103020274A - Document analysis method and system - Google Patents
Document analysis method and system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN103020274A CN103020274A CN2012105788002A CN201210578800A CN103020274A CN 103020274 A CN103020274 A CN 103020274A CN 2012105788002 A CN2012105788002 A CN 2012105788002A CN 201210578800 A CN201210578800 A CN 201210578800A CN 103020274 A CN103020274 A CN 103020274A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- patent documentation
- risk
- value
- group
- countries
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a document analysis method and system. The document analysis method comprises the steps of: searching at least one patent document related to a target scheme in a data base; confirming a risk factor value of each patent document by utilizing the technical indexes of the patent documents; grouping the patent documents; in each group, calculating a regional risk value of each group by utilizing n patent documents with highest risk factor values; and performing weighted approach on the regional risk value of each group to obtain the patent risk prewarning value of the target scheme in the country and region by utilizing the country and region early-warning indexes of the groups. According to the document analysis method and system, disclosed by the invention, patent risks brought to enterprises applying related technical schemes in the countries and regions are calculated by calculating the patent risk prewarning values of the target schemes in the countries and regions, thus the labor cost is reduced, the work efficiency is improved, and accurate decision support is provided for the development of the enterprises.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to Data Mining, particularly relate to a kind of document analysis method and system.
Background technology
Along with further developing of socio-economic activity, patent is brought into play more and more large effect at Technique Popularizing and application facet.For fear of unnecessary patent dispute occurring in the Technique Popularizing application facet, each enterprise all can carry out corresponding patent venture analysis when carrying out market evaluation.
At present, this mode mainly is to carry out with manual type, namely analyzes the competition among enterprises adversary at the patented claim in the countries concerned or area, the protection domain of the relevant patented claim of analysis by manual type.Because the patent documentation quantity that is associated with enterprise may be very huge, when patent documentation is analyzed, need dependency analysis personnel's professional knowledge and working experience, so cost of labor is very high simultaneously.Risk assessment is extremely disadvantageous for patent for this.
Summary of the invention
The technical problem to be solved in the present invention provides a kind of document analysis method and system.By calculating target protocol in the patent Risk-warning value in the countries concerned area, assess enterprise and use the patent risk that the relevant technologies scheme is brought in these countries and regions.Therefore reduce cost of labor, increase work efficiency, for the development of enterprise provides accurately decision support.
According to an aspect of the present invention, provide a kind of document analysis method, comprising:
At least one patent documentation that retrieval is associated with target protocol in database;
For each patent documentation, utilize the technical indicator of patent documentation to determine the risk factor value of patent documentation;
Utilize countries and regions' identification information of patent documentation, patent documentation is divided into groups, wherein in each group, with the risk class information of the countries and regions of the publication document countries and regions' warning index as group;
In each group, utilize n the highest patent documentation of risk factor value, calculate the Regional Risk value of group;
Utilize countries and regions' warning index of group, the Regional Risk value of group is weighted processing, to obtain target protocol in the patent Risk-warning value of described countries and regions.
Preferably, in each group, utilize n the highest patent documentation of risk factor value, the step of calculating the Regional Risk value of group comprises:
In each group, for each patent documentation in n the highest patent documentation of risk factor value, utilize applicant's weighted value that the risk factor value of patent documentation is weighted processing, to obtain value-at-risk;
Calculate the mean value of n value-at-risk, to obtain the Regional Risk value of group.
Preferably, technical indicator comprises that the technical field of patent documentation is with respect to the similarity of target protocol.
Preferably, in denomination of invention, summary and/or the claim of patent documentation, by extracting at least one keyword be associated with target protocol, add up the frequency of occurrence of described keyword, with as the technical field of the patent documentation similarity with respect to target protocol.
Preferably, technical indicator also comprises the ICL number of patent documentation.
Preferably, technical indicator also comprises in the instructions number of pages, claim number, independent claims number of patent documentation at least one.
Preferably, technical indicator comprises that also patent documentation quotes the number of other patent documentation, patent documentation and quote in the patent families number of the number of other non-patent literature, number of times that patent documentation is quoted by other patent documentation, patent documentation at least one.
Preferably, technical indicator also comprises application category, statutory status, at least one item in Patent right valid period of patent documentation.
According to a further aspect in the invention, provide a kind of document analysis system, comprising:
Retrieval unit is used at least one patent documentation that is associated with target protocol in the database retrieval;
The risk factor determining unit is used for for each patent documentation, utilizes the technical indicator of patent documentation to determine the risk factor value of patent documentation;
Grouped element is used for utilizing countries and regions' identification information of patent documentation, patent documentation is divided into groups, wherein in each group, with the risk class information of the countries and regions of the publication document countries and regions' warning index as group;
Regional Risk value determining unit is used in each group, utilizes n the highest patent documentation of risk factor value, calculates the Regional Risk value of group;
Patent Risk-warning value determining unit is used for utilizing countries and regions' warning index of group, the Regional Risk value of group is weighted processing, to obtain target protocol in the patent Risk-warning value of described countries and regions.
Preferably, Regional Risk value determining unit specifically in each group, for each patent documentation in n the highest patent documentation of risk factor value, utilizes applicant's weighted value that the risk factor value of patent documentation is weighted processing, to obtain value-at-risk; Calculate the mean value of n value-at-risk, to obtain the Regional Risk value of group.
Preferably, technical indicator comprises that the technical field of patent documentation is with respect to the similarity of target protocol.
Preferably, in denomination of invention, summary and/or the claim of patent documentation, by extracting at least one keyword be associated with target protocol, add up the frequency of occurrence of described keyword, with as the technical field of the patent documentation similarity with respect to target protocol.
Preferably, technical indicator also comprises the ICL number of patent documentation.
Preferably, technical indicator also comprises in the instructions number of pages, claim number, independent claims number of patent documentation at least one.
Preferably, technical indicator comprises that also patent documentation quotes the number of other patent documentation, patent documentation and quote in the patent families number of the number of other non-patent literature, number of times that patent documentation is quoted by other patent documentation, patent documentation at least one.
Preferably, technical indicator also comprises application category, statutory status, at least one item in Patent right valid period of patent documentation.
At least one patent documentation that the present invention is associated with target protocol by retrieval in database; For each patent documentation, utilize the technical indicator of patent documentation to determine the risk factor value of patent documentation; Utilize countries and regions' identification information of patent documentation, patent documentation is divided into groups, wherein in each group, with the risk class information of the countries and regions of the publication document countries and regions' warning index as group; In each group, utilize n the highest patent documentation of risk factor value, calculate the Regional Risk value of group; Utilize countries and regions' warning index of group, the Regional Risk value of group is weighted processing, to obtain target protocol in the patent Risk-warning value of described countries and regions.By calculating target protocol in the patent Risk-warning value in the countries concerned area, assess enterprise and use the patent risk that the relevant technologies scheme is brought in these countries and regions.Thereby reduce cost of labor, increase work efficiency, for the development of enterprise provides accurately decision support.
Description of drawings
Fig. 1 is the synoptic diagram of an embodiment of document analysis method of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is the synoptic diagram of an embodiment of zoning of the present invention value-at-risk.
Fig. 3 is the synoptic diagram of a document analysis embodiment of system of the present invention.
Fig. 4 is the synoptic diagram of an embodiment of risk map of the present invention.
Embodiment
With reference to the accompanying drawings the present invention is described more fully, exemplary embodiment of the present invention wherein is described.
Fig. 1 is the synoptic diagram of an embodiment of document analysis method of the present invention.As shown in Figure 1, the document analysis method step that provides of present embodiment is as follows:
The document analysis method that provides based on the above embodiment of the present invention, at least one patent documentation that is associated with target protocol by retrieval in database; For each patent documentation, utilize the technical indicator of patent documentation to determine the risk factor value of patent documentation; Utilize countries and regions' identification information of patent documentation, patent documentation is divided into groups, wherein in each group, with the risk class information of the countries and regions of the publication document countries and regions' warning index as group; In each group, utilize n the highest patent documentation of risk factor value, calculate the Regional Risk value of group; Utilize countries and regions' warning index of group, the Regional Risk value of group is weighted processing, to obtain target protocol in the patent Risk-warning value of described countries and regions.By calculating target protocol in the patent Risk-warning value in the countries concerned area, assess enterprise and use the patent risk that the relevant technologies scheme is brought in these countries and regions.Thereby reduce cost of labor, increase work efficiency, for the development of enterprise provides accurately decision support.
Preferably, an embodiment who calculates the Regional Risk value in the above-mentioned steps 104 as shown in Figure 2.Fig. 2 is the synoptic diagram of an embodiment of zoning of the present invention value-at-risk, wherein in Fig. 2:
For a patent documentation, if the application people of this patent documentation is the rival of enterprise, mean that then this patent documentation may be larger on the impact of enterprise, that is to say that the patent risk that this patent documentation causes is larger.By improving applicant's weighted value of rival's application, can further give prominence to the rival and apply for a patent the patent risk of bringing, this is useful for assessment patent risk.
Preferably, can utilize addition or phase multiplication, to utilize applicant's weighted value the risk factor value of patent documentation is weighted processing.
Preferably, when the technology of enterprise or product promotion during to the surging protection of patent country, the patent risk of these countries is higher.Therefore increase weight by the patent to these countries, can be conducive to the patent risk assessment of enterprise.
Preferably, in above-mentioned steps 105, utilize countries and regions' warning index, the Regional Risk value of group is being weighted when processing, can utilize addition or phase multiplication to be weighted processing.
Preferably, in above-mentioned steps 102, the technical indicator of patent documentation comprises that the technical field of patent documentation is with respect to the similarity of target protocol.Usually, similarity is higher, and then the patent risk brought of patent documentation is larger.
Preferably, in denomination of invention, summary and/or the claim of patent documentation, by extracting at least one keyword be associated with target protocol, add up the frequency of occurrence of described keyword, with as the technical field of the patent documentation similarity with respect to target protocol.
Need explanation the time owing to for the analysis of patent documentation technical field, be to carry out according to unified standard, do not need analyst's professional knowledge and working experience, the Stability and veracity of the analysis that therefore improves.
Preferably, technical indicator also comprises the ICL number of patent documentation.
International Patent classificating number (International Patent Classification, be called for short: IPC) be to work out according to the "Stasbourg Agreement Concerning the International Patent Classification" of signing in 1971, be at present only international patent documentation classification and gopher, be used for a large amount of patent documentations are classified.The International Classification of Patents system sets up classification according to technical theme, and whole technical field is divided into 5 different brackets: section, large class, group, greatly group and group.Obviously, if the number of the international Patent classificating number that patent documentation relates to is more, show that then the related technology contents of this patent documentation is wider, thereby the patent risk that patent documentation may cause is also larger.
Preferably, technical indicator also comprises in the instructions number of pages, claim number, independent claims number of patent documentation at least one.
Instructions is the part of record patented technology scheme embodiment.The instructions number of pages is more, shows that the technology contents that this patent documentation relates to is also more, and the sport technique segment that relates to is also more, and the patent risk that possible patent documentation causes is also larger.
What is claimed is for the text that limits the patent documentation protection domain.The claim number is more, shows that the patent documentation protection domain is wider, and the patent risk that patent documentation may cause is also larger.
Independent claims are reacted the technical scheme of patent documentation on the whole, the essential features of record technical solution problem.The independent claims number is more, show that then the technical scheme that patent documentation relates to is more, thereby the patent risk that patent documentation may cause is also larger.
Preferably, technical indicator comprises that also patent documentation quotes the number of other patent documentation, patent documentation and quote in the patent families number of the number of other non-patent literature, number of times that patent documentation is quoted by other patent documentation, patent documentation at least one.
Patent documentation is quoted other patent documentation, show between this patent documentation and other patent documentation and to have contacting more or less, the number that patent documentation is quoted other patent documentation is more, show that the relation between this patent and other patent documentation is more complicated, thereby the patent risk that patent documentation may cause is also larger.
Patent documentation is quoted other non-patent literature, shows that the technology contents of this patent documentation is associated such as industry standard, technical manual, paper etc. with other technological document.The number that patent documentation is quoted other non-patent literature is more, then show this patent more possible be basic patent at correlative technology field, thereby the patent risk that patent documentation may cause is also larger.
The number of times that patent documentation is quoted by other patent documentation is used for showing this patent documentation concerned degree in correlative technology field.The number of times that patent documentation is quoted by other patent documentation is more, then show this patent documentation more possible be basic patent at correlative technology field, the attention rate that is subject to is higher, thus the patent risk that patent documentation may cause is also larger.
Patent families refers to that based on same priority document in country variant or area, and the interzone patent is organized repeatedly the identical or essentially identical one group of patent documentation of content of applying for, repeatedly announcing or ratify.One group of patent documentation by at least one common right of priority contact claims a patent family.Every patent documentation is known as the patent family member in same patent family, every patent patent families each other in the same patent family.The patent documentation of right of priority claims basic patent the earliest in same patent family.
The patent families number of patent documentation is more, show that this technical scheme that is associated with patent documentation is more at the number of times of country variant and regional application, the attention degree that shows the technical scheme that the applicant relates to this patent documentation is also higher, thereby the patent risk that patent documentation may cause is also larger.
Preferably, technical indicator also comprises application category, statutory status, at least one item in Patent right valid period of patent documentation.
Generally, the applying type of patent documentation comprises invention, utility model and appearance design.Because the protection period of patent of invention is longer, scheme protection type is more, so the patent risk that patent of invention may cause is also larger.
Generally, the statutory status of patent documentation comprise effective, invalid, the state such as examining.For the invalidated patent document, because it no longer is protected by the law, therefore the risk factors of invalidated patent document can be made as 0.
Patent right valid period refers to that patent documentation enjoys the Patent right effecting surplus time.The effecting surplus time is longer, and then the patent documentation patent risk that may cause is also larger.
Preferably, technical indicator also can comprise the project of artificial index, is used for carrying out the risk assessment of Extraordinary patent according to user's request.
Fig. 3 is the synoptic diagram of a document analysis embodiment of system of the present invention.As shown in Figure 3, the document analysis system comprises retrieval unit 301, risk factor determining unit 302, grouped element 303, Regional Risk value determining unit 304 and patent Risk-warning value determining unit 305.Wherein:
Risk factor determining unit 302 is used for for each patent documentation, utilizes the technical indicator of patent documentation to determine the risk factor value of patent documentation.
Grouped element 303 is used for utilizing countries and regions' identification information of patent documentation, patent documentation is divided into groups, wherein in each group, with the risk class information of the countries and regions of the publication document countries and regions' warning index as group.
Regional Risk value determining unit 304 is used in each group, utilizes n the highest patent documentation of risk factor value, calculates the Regional Risk value of group.
Patent Risk-warning value determining unit 305 is used for utilizing countries and regions' warning index of group, the Regional Risk value of group is weighted processing, to obtain target protocol in the patent Risk-warning value of described countries and regions.
The document analysis system that provides based on the above embodiment of the present invention, at least one patent documentation that is associated with target protocol by retrieval in database; For each patent documentation, utilize the technical indicator of patent documentation to determine the risk factor value of patent documentation; Utilize countries and regions' identification information of patent documentation, patent documentation is divided into groups, wherein in each group, with the risk class information of the countries and regions of the publication document countries and regions' warning index as group; In each group, utilize n the highest patent documentation of risk factor value, calculate the Regional Risk value of group; Utilize countries and regions' warning index of group, the Regional Risk value of group is weighted processing, to obtain target protocol in the patent Risk-warning value of described countries and regions.By calculating target protocol in the patent Risk-warning value in the countries concerned area, assess enterprise and use the patent risk that the relevant technologies scheme is brought in these countries and regions.Thereby reduce cost of labor, increase work efficiency, for the development of enterprise provides accurately decision support.
Preferably, Regional Risk value determining unit specifically in each group, for each patent documentation in n the highest patent documentation of risk factor value, utilizes applicant's weighted value that the risk factor value of patent documentation is weighted processing, to obtain value-at-risk; Calculate the mean value of n value-at-risk, to obtain the Regional Risk value of group.
Preferably, technical indicator comprises that the technical field of patent documentation is with respect to the similarity of target protocol.
Preferably, in denomination of invention, summary and/or the claim of patent documentation, by extracting at least one keyword be associated with target protocol, add up the frequency of occurrence of described keyword, with as the technical field of the patent documentation similarity with respect to target protocol.
Preferably, technical indicator also comprises the ICL number of patent documentation.
Preferably, technical indicator also comprises in the instructions number of pages, claim number, independent claims number of patent documentation at least one.
Preferably, technical indicator comprises that also patent documentation quotes the number of other patent documentation, patent documentation and quote in the patent families number of the number of other non-patent literature, number of times that patent documentation is quoted by other patent documentation, patent documentation at least one.
Preferably, technical indicator also comprises application category, statutory status, at least one item in Patent right valid period of patent documentation.
The present invention assesses enterprise and uses the patent risk that the relevant technologies scheme is brought in these countries and regions by calculating target protocol in the patent Risk-warning value in the countries concerned area.Thereby reduce cost of labor, increase work efficiency, for the development of enterprise provides accurately decision support.Provide decision support for great business activities such as enterprise innovation research and development, patent asset operation, infringement early warning, valuation of patent, patent action, cooperation mergers simultaneously.
By on patent map, represent the value-at-risk in country variant or area with different colours, can further provide direct visually-perceptible to the user.
Fig. 4 is the synoptic diagram of an embodiment of risk map of the present invention.As shown in Figure 4, the value-at-risk of utilizing the various embodiments described above of the present invention to calculate is showed at world map, represent the risk class of zones of different by different colours, be convenient to analyze and statistical risk early warning result.Wherein, map attribute can comprise: color, coordinate, numerical value, literal etc., and the special effective functions such as movement, convergent-divergent are provided.
Simultaneously, the focus that provides for each area, but clickthrough is checked concrete patent documentation inventory.
Description of the invention provides for example with for the purpose of describing, and is not exhaustively or limit the invention to disclosed form.Many modifications and variations are obvious for the ordinary skill in the art.Selecting and describing embodiment is for better explanation principle of the present invention and practical application, thereby and makes those of ordinary skill in the art can understand the various embodiment with various modifications that the present invention's design is suitable for special-purpose.
Claims (16)
1. a document analysis method is characterized in that, comprising:
At least one patent documentation that retrieval is associated with target protocol in database;
For each patent documentation, utilize the technical indicator of patent documentation to determine the risk factor value of patent documentation;
Utilize countries and regions' identification information of patent documentation, patent documentation is divided into groups, wherein in each group, with the risk class information of the countries and regions of the publication document countries and regions' warning index as group;
In each group, utilize n the highest patent documentation of risk factor value, calculate the Regional Risk value of group;
Utilize countries and regions' warning index of group, the Regional Risk value of group is weighted processing, to obtain target protocol in the patent Risk-warning value of described countries and regions.
2. method according to claim 1 is characterized in that:
In each group, utilize n the highest patent documentation of risk factor value, the step of calculating the Regional Risk value of group comprises:
In each group, for each patent documentation in n the highest patent documentation of risk factor value, utilize applicant's weighted value that the risk factor value of patent documentation is weighted processing, to obtain value-at-risk;
Calculate the mean value of n value-at-risk, to obtain the Regional Risk value of group.
3. method according to claim 1 and 2 is characterized in that:
Technical indicator comprises that the technical field of patent documentation is with respect to the similarity of target protocol.
4. method according to claim 3 is characterized in that:
In denomination of invention, summary and/or the claim of patent documentation, by extracting at least one keyword be associated with target protocol, add up the frequency of occurrence of described keyword, with as the technical field of the patent documentation similarity with respect to target protocol.
5. method according to claim 3 is characterized in that:
Technical indicator also comprises the ICL number of patent documentation.
6. method according to claim 3 is characterized in that:
Technical indicator also comprises at least one in the instructions number of pages, claim number, independent claims number of patent documentation.
7. method according to claim 3 is characterized in that:
Technical indicator comprises that also patent documentation quotes the number of other patent documentation, patent documentation and quote in the patent families number of the number of other non-patent literature, number of times that patent documentation is quoted by other patent documentation, patent documentation at least one.
8. method according to claim 3 is characterized in that:
Technical indicator also comprises application category, statutory status, at least one item in Patent right valid period of patent documentation.
9. a document analysis system is characterized in that, comprising:
Retrieval unit is used at least one patent documentation that is associated with target protocol in the database retrieval;
The risk factor determining unit is used for for each patent documentation, utilizes the technical indicator of patent documentation to determine the risk factor value of patent documentation;
Grouped element is used for utilizing countries and regions' identification information of patent documentation, patent documentation is divided into groups, wherein in each group, with the risk class information of the countries and regions of the publication document countries and regions' warning index as group;
Regional Risk value determining unit is used in each group, utilizes n the highest patent documentation of risk factor value, calculates the Regional Risk value of group;
Patent Risk-warning value determining unit is used for utilizing countries and regions' warning index of group, the Regional Risk value of group is weighted processing, to obtain target protocol in the patent Risk-warning value of described countries and regions.
10. system according to claim 9 is characterized in that:
Regional Risk value determining unit specifically in each group, for each patent documentation in n the highest patent documentation of risk factor value, utilizes applicant's weighted value that the risk factor value of patent documentation is weighted processing, to obtain value-at-risk; Calculate the mean value of n value-at-risk, to obtain the Regional Risk value of group.
11. according to claim 9 or 10 described systems, it is characterized in that:
Technical indicator comprises that the technical field of patent documentation is with respect to the similarity of target protocol.
12. system according to claim 11 is characterized in that:
In denomination of invention, summary and/or the claim of patent documentation, by extracting at least one keyword be associated with target protocol, add up the frequency of occurrence of described keyword, with as the technical field of the patent documentation similarity with respect to target protocol.
13. system according to claim 11 is characterized in that:
Technical indicator also comprises the ICL number of patent documentation.
14. system according to claim 11 is characterized in that:
Technical indicator also comprises at least one in the instructions number of pages, claim number, independent claims number of patent documentation.
15. system according to claim 11 is characterized in that:
Technical indicator comprises that also patent documentation quotes the number of other patent documentation, patent documentation and quote in the patent families number of the number of other non-patent literature, number of times that patent documentation is quoted by other patent documentation, patent documentation at least one.
16. system according to claim 11 is characterized in that:
Technical indicator also comprises application category, statutory status, at least one item in Patent right valid period of patent documentation.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN2012105788002A CN103020274A (en) | 2012-12-27 | 2012-12-27 | Document analysis method and system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN2012105788002A CN103020274A (en) | 2012-12-27 | 2012-12-27 | Document analysis method and system |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN103020274A true CN103020274A (en) | 2013-04-03 |
Family
ID=47968877
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN2012105788002A Pending CN103020274A (en) | 2012-12-27 | 2012-12-27 | Document analysis method and system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN103020274A (en) |
Cited By (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103473269A (en) * | 2013-08-16 | 2013-12-25 | 北京科技大学 | Data mining method used for building enterprise innovationmethod base |
| CN103793472A (en) * | 2013-12-31 | 2014-05-14 | 青岛中科软件股份有限公司 | Patent navigation pre-warning system based on Google maps |
| CN104572709A (en) * | 2013-10-18 | 2015-04-29 | 北京中海纪元数字技术发展股份有限公司 | Data mining system used for enterprise innovation system |
| CN105023142A (en) * | 2015-07-17 | 2015-11-04 | 北京国之专利预警咨询中心 | Method and device used for information reminding |
| CN105046476A (en) * | 2015-07-17 | 2015-11-11 | 北京国之专利预警咨询中心 | Information reminding method and device |
| CN105825447A (en) * | 2016-05-06 | 2016-08-03 | 长沙市麓智信息科技有限公司 | Fast assessment system for creativity of patents, and fast assessment method thereof |
| CN107610004A (en) * | 2017-10-25 | 2018-01-19 | 深圳市宝盒科技有限公司 | A kind of commodity are really weighed and acquisition methods, computer |
| CN109558998A (en) * | 2017-09-25 | 2019-04-02 | 国家电网公司信息通信分公司 | Dispatching method and server in the assessment of patent value machine |
| CN109685303A (en) * | 2018-08-21 | 2019-04-26 | 平安普惠企业管理有限公司 | Financial product risk monitoring and control method, apparatus, equipment and readable storage medium storing program for executing |
| CN110298545A (en) * | 2019-05-23 | 2019-10-01 | 中国科学院计算技术研究所 | A kind of valuation of patent method, system and medium neural network based |
| CN112015737A (en) * | 2020-08-24 | 2020-12-01 | 华智众创(北京)投资管理有限责任公司 | Patent data processing method and device, computing equipment and storage medium |
| CN112464648A (en) * | 2020-11-23 | 2021-03-09 | 南瑞集团有限公司 | Industry standard blank feature recognition system and method based on multi-source data analysis |
| CN117271653A (en) * | 2023-10-12 | 2023-12-22 | 四川大学 | Multi-dimensional patent map construction method and system |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101276360A (en) * | 2007-03-30 | 2008-10-01 | 建准电机工业股份有限公司 | Reliability verification method of patent retrieval data |
| CN101276345A (en) * | 2007-03-29 | 2008-10-01 | 上海汉光知识产权数据科技有限公司 | Patent data analysis system |
| CN102696027A (en) * | 2009-12-02 | 2012-09-26 | 基金Ip有限公司 | Method and system for performing analysis on documents related to various technology fields |
-
2012
- 2012-12-27 CN CN2012105788002A patent/CN103020274A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101276345A (en) * | 2007-03-29 | 2008-10-01 | 上海汉光知识产权数据科技有限公司 | Patent data analysis system |
| CN101276360A (en) * | 2007-03-30 | 2008-10-01 | 建准电机工业股份有限公司 | Reliability verification method of patent retrieval data |
| CN102696027A (en) * | 2009-12-02 | 2012-09-26 | 基金Ip有限公司 | Method and system for performing analysis on documents related to various technology fields |
Cited By (21)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103473269A (en) * | 2013-08-16 | 2013-12-25 | 北京科技大学 | Data mining method used for building enterprise innovationmethod base |
| CN104572709A (en) * | 2013-10-18 | 2015-04-29 | 北京中海纪元数字技术发展股份有限公司 | Data mining system used for enterprise innovation system |
| CN104572709B (en) * | 2013-10-18 | 2018-04-03 | 北京中海纪元数字技术发展股份有限公司 | Data digging system for enterprise innovation system |
| CN103793472A (en) * | 2013-12-31 | 2014-05-14 | 青岛中科软件股份有限公司 | Patent navigation pre-warning system based on Google maps |
| CN105046476B (en) * | 2015-07-17 | 2019-05-31 | 北京国知专利预警咨询有限公司 | A kind of method and apparatus for information reminding |
| CN105023142A (en) * | 2015-07-17 | 2015-11-04 | 北京国之专利预警咨询中心 | Method and device used for information reminding |
| CN105046476A (en) * | 2015-07-17 | 2015-11-11 | 北京国之专利预警咨询中心 | Information reminding method and device |
| CN105023142B (en) * | 2015-07-17 | 2019-08-23 | 北京国知专利预警咨询有限公司 | A kind of method and apparatus for information reminding |
| CN105825447A (en) * | 2016-05-06 | 2016-08-03 | 长沙市麓智信息科技有限公司 | Fast assessment system for creativity of patents, and fast assessment method thereof |
| CN109558998A (en) * | 2017-09-25 | 2019-04-02 | 国家电网公司信息通信分公司 | Dispatching method and server in the assessment of patent value machine |
| CN109558998B (en) * | 2017-09-25 | 2023-09-22 | 国家电网公司信息通信分公司 | Scheduling method and server in patent value machine evaluation |
| CN107610004A (en) * | 2017-10-25 | 2018-01-19 | 深圳市宝盒科技有限公司 | A kind of commodity are really weighed and acquisition methods, computer |
| CN109685303A (en) * | 2018-08-21 | 2019-04-26 | 平安普惠企业管理有限公司 | Financial product risk monitoring and control method, apparatus, equipment and readable storage medium storing program for executing |
| CN110298545A (en) * | 2019-05-23 | 2019-10-01 | 中国科学院计算技术研究所 | A kind of valuation of patent method, system and medium neural network based |
| CN110298545B (en) * | 2019-05-23 | 2022-05-27 | 中国科学院计算技术研究所 | Patent evaluation method, system and medium based on neural network |
| CN112015737A (en) * | 2020-08-24 | 2020-12-01 | 华智众创(北京)投资管理有限责任公司 | Patent data processing method and device, computing equipment and storage medium |
| CN112015737B (en) * | 2020-08-24 | 2021-03-30 | 华智众创(北京)投资管理有限责任公司 | Patent data processing method and device, computing equipment and storage medium |
| CN112464648A (en) * | 2020-11-23 | 2021-03-09 | 南瑞集团有限公司 | Industry standard blank feature recognition system and method based on multi-source data analysis |
| CN112464648B (en) * | 2020-11-23 | 2023-08-18 | 南瑞集团有限公司 | Industry standard blank feature recognition system and method based on multi-source data analysis |
| CN117271653A (en) * | 2023-10-12 | 2023-12-22 | 四川大学 | Multi-dimensional patent map construction method and system |
| CN117271653B (en) * | 2023-10-12 | 2024-06-04 | 四川大学 | Multi-dimensional patent map construction method and system |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN103020274A (en) | Document analysis method and system | |
| O’Rourke | The science of sustainable supply chains | |
| CN106548381A (en) | Intelligent subscriber tag systems and implementation method | |
| Kuo | The construction of a collaborative framework in support of low carbon product design | |
| Chang et al. | What makes a great journal great in the sciences? Which came first, the chicken or the egg? | |
| O'Shea et al. | Sustainability and earth resources: life cycle assessment modeling | |
| Singh et al. | Lean Supply-Chain: A State-of-the-art Literature Review. | |
| Hřebíček et al. | Sustainability indicators: development and application for the agriculture sector | |
| WO2021072128A1 (en) | Systems and methods for big data analytics | |
| CN108572988A (en) | A kind of house property assessment data creation method and device | |
| Nitsche et al. | Mapping supply chain collaboration research: a machine learning-based literature review | |
| Zhang et al. | A patent portfolio-based approach for identifying technological threat from competitors | |
| Waltman et al. | A taxonomy of bibliometric performance indicators based on the property of consistency | |
| CN108615117B (en) | Shipping bearing capacity evaluation method and device and storage medium | |
| CN107239456A (en) | Age bracket recognition methods and device | |
| Baron | The root and responsibility model: a framework for ethical consumption | |
| Scholta | Semi-automatic inductive derivation of reference process models that represent best practices in public administrations | |
| Bourcier et al. | Codification, law article and graphs | |
| CN108038199A (en) | The sensor time series data storage method and system of a kind of hierarchical structure | |
| CN109359185A (en) | A kind of part-time intelligent search sort method | |
| Pongsayaporn et al. | Interrelationships Among Factors Influencing Multimodal Transportation Efficiency of Agricultural Products in Thailand | |
| Dumoulin et al. | Locating human resources to reduce the cost of managing networks of protected areas | |
| Dunmade et al. | A social lifecycle assessment model for sachet water production in Nigeria | |
| CN110969499A (en) | User data processing method and device and computer readable storage medium | |
| CN102637278A (en) | Behavior evaluation system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20130403 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |