CN102999042B - Layering fault autonomic diagnostic method of global navigation chart (GNC) system of deep space probe - Google Patents

Layering fault autonomic diagnostic method of global navigation chart (GNC) system of deep space probe Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN102999042B
CN102999042B CN201210504945.8A CN201210504945A CN102999042B CN 102999042 B CN102999042 B CN 102999042B CN 201210504945 A CN201210504945 A CN 201210504945A CN 102999042 B CN102999042 B CN 102999042B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
fault
gyro
gnc
diagnosis
star sensor
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201210504945.8A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN102999042A (en
Inventor
刘成瑞
王大轶
黄翔宇
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Beijing Institute of Control Engineering
Original Assignee
Beijing Institute of Control Engineering
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Beijing Institute of Control Engineering filed Critical Beijing Institute of Control Engineering
Priority to CN201210504945.8A priority Critical patent/CN102999042B/en
Publication of CN102999042A publication Critical patent/CN102999042A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN102999042B publication Critical patent/CN102999042B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Gyroscopes (AREA)

Abstract

Provided is a layering fault autonomic diagnostic method of a global navigation chart (GNC) system of a deep space probe. The layering fault autonomic diagnostic method comprises the steps of (1) establishing a fault-measurement point incidence matrix, determining that a fault mode is the diagnostic result if the fault mode can be determined only according to the fault-measurement point incidence matrix, and executing the step (2) to perform component-level fault diagnosis if the fault mode can not be determined only according to the fault-measurement point incidence matrix; (2) performing fault diagnosis by utilizing the redundancy relation between sensors of the GNC system and consistency of the input and output relation of an executing mechanism to obtain the member having the fault, and executing the step (3) to perform system-level fault diagnosis if the redundancy relation is not met; (3) judging whether the GNC system is the smallest system, calculating the theoretical angular velocity of the probe if the GNC system is not the smallest system, diagnosing out the specific member having the fault according to the consistency of the theoretical angular velocity and the angular velocity measured by the sensors, and executing the step (4) if the GNC system is the smallest system; and (4) accumulating air injection time of a thruster in an X-axis direction, a Y-axis direction and a Z-axis direction, determining that the GNC system has the fault if the accumulated time in any of the X-axis direction, the Y-axis direction and the Z-axis direction exceeds the preset threshold value within the fixed time, and determining that the GNC system is normal if the accumulated time in any of the X-axis direction, the Y-axis direction and the Z-axis direction does not exceed the preset threshold value within the fixed time.

Description

Deep space probe GNC system layer method for automatic fault diagnosis
Technical field
The invention belongs to Spacecraft malfunction process field, relate to a kind of method for automatic fault diagnosis, the fault being applicable to deep space probe GNC system is independently diagnosed and processes.
Background technology
For survey of deep space task, the detected object of spacecraft, object and residing environment are all different from earth satellite system, thus bring new challenge to the operation of spacecraft and control technology.First the deep space probe flight time is long, and deep space environment X factor is many and complicated, this probability increase just making GNC system and parts meet with accident and break down.Secondly, the communication delay of deep space probe and ground control station is large, and signal also may be blocked by the sun and other celestial bodies, and this makes the navigation and vehicle controL reaction based on ground control station slow, being unfavorable for the process of accident, will be especially very dangerous for manned survey of deep space task.Therefore, in order to ensure that deep space probe can process after breaking down in time, reducing failure risk, needing development automatic fault diagnosis technology, realizing still can independently to the detection of fault, isolation and location when ground communication interrupts completely, the autonomous viability of enhancing survey of deep space.For this reason, NASA (NASA) and European Space Agency (ESA) all consider and adopt automatic fault diagnosis technology in detection mission, and Rosetta (Rosetta) plan etc. that such as Saturn detector Cassini, NEAR task (NEAR), Deep Space 1 (DS-1), the plan of deep space shock and comet detect all develops corresponding automatic fault diagnosis system.China have also contemplated that automatic fault diagnosis technology at deep space probe design aspect, but the trouble diagnosibility had at present is more weak, not yet form the method for diagnosing faults of system, and independence is inadequate.
Summary of the invention
Technology of the present invention is dealt with problems and is: overcome the deficiencies in the prior art, a kind of deep space probe GNC system layer method for automatic fault diagnosis is provided, the method is by divide into several levels such as component-level fault diagnosis, component level fault diagnosis, Methods for Diagnosing System Level Malfunctions by fault diagnosis, thus can independently diagnose as early as possible after fault is occurred, ensure that the safety and reliability of system.
Technical solution of the present invention is: deep space probe GNC system layer method for automatic fault diagnosis, and step is as follows:
(1) according to component failure modes analysis (FMEA) result, fault-measuring point incidence matrix is set up; The self-inspection information, the analog quantity telemetry intelligence (TELINT) that there is provided according to GNC various parts and carry out fault diagnosis according to fault-measuring point incidence matrix, if uniquely can determine fault mode according to fault-measuring point incidence matrix, then this fault mode is diagnostic result; Otherwise go to step (2) and carry out component level fault diagnosis;
(2) utilize the consistance of the superfluous She's relation between GNC system sensitive device and topworks's input/output relation to carry out fault diagnosis, obtain the parts broken down; To redundancy relationship do not met or uniquely can not determine that the parts of fault go to step (3) and carry out Methods for Diagnosing System Level Malfunctions;
(3) judge whether GNC system is minimum system, if not minimum system, then first utilizing the redundancy relationship of sensor or topworks to judge is sensor failure or actuator failure, again the theoretical control moment that controller produces is substituted into dynamics and the kinematical equation of detector, resolve the theoretical angular velocity of detector, the consistance according to theoretical angular velocity and sensor measured angular speed diagnoses out the parts specifically broken down; Otherwise go to step (4); Described minimum system is sensor, topworks does not exist redundancy;
(4) jet time of accumulative thruster three axle all directions, in official hour, if the accumulative jet time of three axle either directions exceedes the threshold value preset, then there is fault in GNC system, otherwise GNC system is normal.
Described component level fault diagnosis mainly comprise diagnose based on the gyro in odd even space, star sensor diagnosis, gyro and star sensor Combining diagnosis; Based on the momenttum wheel fault diagnosis of input and output direct redundancy.
Described gyro and star sensor Combining diagnosis are applicable to gyro and star sensor quantity summation when being more than or equal to 5, and single fault occurs hypothesis, and diagnosis algorithm is as follows:
(2.1) when gyro quantity is 4, according to the consistance that each gyro exports, judge that whether gyro is abnormal, if export consistent, then gyro is all normal, otherwise gyro exists abnormal, goes to step (2.3);
(2.2) when star sensor quantity is 2, according to the consistance that each star sensor exports, judge that whether star sensor is abnormal, if export consistent, then star sensor is normal, otherwise star sensor is abnormal, goes to step (2.3);
(2.3) when gyro or any one parts of star sensor exist abnormal, then the consistance of the angular velocity recorded according to gyro and star sensor, determines trouble unit.
The present invention compared with prior art beneficial effect is:
(1) the survey of deep space spacecraft method for automatic fault diagnosis that the present invention proposes have employed layering, first realizes the fault larger to parts by component-level diagnosis and carries out detection isolation in time, ensure that parts and security of system; Then carry out component level diagnosis, can realize detecting the small fault of parts and isolating; When the Analysis design of system is not enough to carry out component level diagnosis, introduces dynamics and kinematics, make full use of system-level redundancy relationship and carry out system level diagnostic, the fault isolation to sensor and topworks can be realized; When GNC system is minimum system (sensor and topworks do not exist redundancy), whether exceedes setting threshold detecting system by thruster accumulative jet time at the appointed time and whether there is fault.Above-mentioned level can be diagnosed after fault is occurred as early as possible, and fault effects is limited in scope little as far as possible, for consequent malfunction process provides condition, can significantly improve fault detect rate and the isolation rate of deep space probe.
(2) processor that component-level fault diagnosis can make full use of parts self carries out data validity interpretation, reduces the calculating pressure of spaceborne computer;
(3) component level fault diagnosis takes full advantage of redundancy relationship between sensor and input/output relation, and calculated amount is little, real-time good.
(4) Methods for Diagnosing System Level Malfunctions utilizes dynamics and kinematics to refine system-level analytical redundancy relation, can realize the fault isolation of sensor and topworks.
(5) layering that the present invention adopts can be diagnosed after fault is occurred as early as possible, and fault effects is limited in scope little as far as possible, ensure that the safety and reliability of system, meets engineering actual demand.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is the inventive method process flow diagram.
Embodiment
The invention provides a kind of deep space probe GNC system method for automatic fault diagnosis, the fault diagnosis of GNC system be divide into component-level fault diagnosis, component level fault diagnosis, Methods for Diagnosing System Level Malfunctions three levels.First the self-inspection information of parts self and analog quantity telemetry is utilized to carry out component-level fault diagnosis, next utilizes the redundancy relationship between parts, input/output relation carries out component level fault diagnosis, along with failure condition worsens, when component-level redundancy relationship can not meet the redundancy requirement of component level diagnosis, spacecraft dynamics is utilized to carry out Methods for Diagnosing System Level Malfunctions, finally when GNC system is minimum system, whether exceed setting threshold detecting system by thruster accumulative jet time at the appointed time and whether there is fault.Below in conjunction with accompanying drawing, the specific embodiment of the present invention is further described in detail.
(1) component-level fault diagnosis
The self-inspection information that this step utilizes parts self to provide and analog quantity telemetry, adopt fault dictionary method to diagnose, can navigate to the functional module of parts.The self-inspection information of parts comprises RAM self-inspection, reset mode, data effective marker, sees high light mark, mode of operation etc., generally represents normal or abnormal with 0 or 1.Analog quantity telemetry comprises power supply remote measurement, remote temperature sensing, motor remote measurement, telemetering of current, rotary speed direction remote measurement etc., is generally the voltage of 0 ~ 5V.
For analog quantity remote measurement, be first converted into 0 or 1 form represented by red line method.Such as, power supply remote measurement is that 4 ~ 5V is effective, then, when measured value V ∈ [4,5], think that power supply remote measurement is normal, represent with 0; When measured value V ∈ [0,4) time, think that power supply remote measurement is abnormal, represent with 1.
According to component failure modes analysis (FMEA) result or fault simulation analysis result, set up fault-measuring point incidence matrix, as shown in table 1.
Table 1 fault-measuring point incidence matrix
Measuring point 1 Measuring point 2 Measuring point n
Fault mode 1 1 0 1
Fault mode 2 0 0 1
Fault mode m 0 1 0
In upper table, behavior measuring point (set of parts self-inspection information and analog quantity telemetry intelligence (TELINT)), be classified as fault mode, the numeral fault mode of ranks infall and the incidence relation of measuring point, being 0 and representing fault mode on measuring point without impact, is that after 1 expression fault mode occurs, measuring point shows as exception.Therefore, define fault dictionary according to fault-measuring point incidence matrix, in detector runs, detect the output of each measuring point in real time, when measuring point output abnormality, according to the abnormal conditions of different measuring points, by the fault dictionary shown in 1 of tabling look-up, just component-level fault diagnosis can be realized.Such as, when measuring point 2 abnormal (numeral of the row of corresponding measuring point 2 is 1) being detected, time other measuring points all normal (numeral of other measuring points corresponding is 0), can obtain fault by the fault dictionary shown in table 1 is fault mode m.
(2) component level fault diagnosis
When component-level diagnosis uniquely can not determine the source of trouble, be then transferred to component level diagnosis.Component level fault diagnosis mainly comprise the mutual diagnosis of similar sensor, inhomogeneity sensor Combining diagnosis, based on the conforming actuator failure diagnosis of input and output.For deep space probe GNC system configuration conventional at present, here main discuss diagnose based on the gyro in odd even space, star sensor is diagnosed, gyro and star sensor Combining diagnosis, based on the conforming momenttum wheel fault diagnosis of input and output, and it is actual according to engineering, think and only a fault occurs simultaneously, namely meet single fault hypothesis.
Component level diagnosis realizes mainly through the consistance of the superfluous She's relation between sensor and topworks's input/output relation, the therefore following conditions for diagnostics of demand fulfillment:
When 1. utilizing multiple gyro to diagnose mutually, require that participating in the gyro number of determining appearance is greater than 4;
When 2. utilizing multiple star sensor to diagnose mutually, require that participating in the star sensor number of determining appearance is greater than 2;
When 3. utilizing gyro and star sensor to carry out Combining diagnosis, require to participate in and determine the gyro of appearance and star sensor quantity summation is more than or equal to 5;
4. computer for controlling can obtain duties such as sending to the steering order of momenttum wheel and momenttum wheel rotating speed, turn to.
On the basis meeting above condition, realize component level diagnosis by following steps:
1., when participating in the gyro number of determining appearance and being greater than 4, multiple gyro is utilized to diagnose mutually
When available gyro number is greater than 4, according to angle between gyro to measure axle as far as possible close to 90 ° principle introduce wherein 5 gyros be work gyro, set the measured angular speed of 5 gyros as g respectively 1, g 2..., g 5, matrix is installed and is respectively A 1, A 2..., A 5, A 1~ A 5be the vector of 1 × 3 dimension.Then by wherein any 3 gyro i, detector three axis angular rate that j, k (i ≠ j ≠ k) determine is
ω ijk = inv ( A i A j A k ) g i g j g k - - - ( 1 )
Wherein, inv () represents matrix inversion (lower same).The then measured value of l (l ≠ i, j, k) individual gyro and ω ijkresidual error between the axial projection of this gyro to measure is
ε ijkl=|g l-A lω ijk| (2)
By i, j, k, l respectively in 1 ~ 5 value, then can obtain ε respectively 1234, ε 1235, ε 2345, ε 1345, ε 1245, setting threshold residual value r 0, make when i gyro failure, residual error relevant to i in footnote is all greater than r 0, and the residual error irrelevant with i is less than r 0.
Detector in orbit in, utilize residual epsilon ijklwith threshold value r 0realize the diagnosis to gyro: respectively diagnosis score value f is set to gyro 1 ~ 5 1~ f 5, work as ε ijkl> r 0time, then f i, f j, f k, f lall subtract 1, work as ε ijkl< r 0time, then f i, f j, f k, f lall add 1, the gyro diagnosing score value to reach 0 is at first fault gyro.
2., when participating in the star sensor number of determining appearance and being greater than 2, multiple star sensor is utilized to diagnose mutually
When the quick number of available star is greater than 2, optionally wherein three stars quick for work star quick, establish 3 quick optical axises recorded of star to be oriented to Z in inertial system respectively s1, Z s2, Z s3, then calculate the quick optical axis included angle of three stars respectively according to measured value:
&alpha; ij = arccos ( Z Si &CenterDot; Z Sj | Z Si | | Z Sj | ) I ≠ j and i, j ∈ (1,2,3) (3)
The installation matrix theoretical angle that respectively can obtain optical axis between quick according to star is α ij0, then the residual error between the quick i of star and the quick j of star between the measurement result of angle and theoretical value is:
ε ij=|α ijij0| (4)
Setting threshold residual value r s0, make when the quick fault of i star, residual error relevant to i in footnote is all greater than r s0, and the residual error irrelevant with i is less than r s0.
Detector in orbit in, utilize residual epsilon ijwith threshold value r s0realize the diagnosis quick to star: respectively to quick 1 ~ 3 setting diagnosis score value f of star s1~ f s3, work as ε ij> r s0time, then f si, f sjall subtract 1, work as ε ij< r s0time, then f si, f sjall add 1, diagnosis score value reach at first 0 star quick for fault star quick.
3. when do not meet requirement 1. and 2. and participate in the gyro of determining appearance and star sensor summation be more than or equal to 5 time, utilize gyro and star sensor to carry out Combining diagnosis
What need Combining diagnosis comprises following 2 kinds of situations:
A.4 individual gyro+1 star sensor
When gyro number be 4, the quick number of star be 1 time, first to gyro, whether fault detects.ε is calculated according to formula (2) 1234if, ε 1234< r 0then illustrate that 4 gyros are all working properly, if otherwise ε 1234> r 0then illustrate to there is gyro failure.
If gyro is all normal, then carry out fault isolation by gyro to measure result to star is quick.If the quick three-axis attitude angular velocity recorded of star is ω s=[ω sx, ω sy, ω sz] ', utilizes gyro to calculate three-axis attitude angular velocity
&omega; 1234 = &omega; 1234 x &omega; 1234 y &omega; 1234 z = inv ( A 1 &prime; A 2 &prime; A 3 &prime; A 4 &prime; A 1 A 2 A 3 A 4 ) A 1 &prime; A 2 &prime; A 3 &prime; A 4 &prime; g 1 g 2 g 3 g 4 - - - ( 5 )
Then calculate residual error:
&epsiv; S = | &Sigma; j = 1 m ( &omega; Sx ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) - &omega; 1234 x ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) ) | + | &Sigma; j = 1 m ( &omega; Sy ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) - &omega; 1234 y ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) ) |
+ | &Sigma; j = 1 m ( &omega; Sz ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) - &omega; 1234 z ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) ) | - - - ( 6 )
Δ t control cycle in formula, t 0for calculating initial time, m is cumulative number, and subscript " ' " represents matrix transpose (lower same).
Work as ε sbe greater than setting threshold value r s0time, then the quick fault of star.
If gyro exists fault, under single fault hypothesis, by star sensor measurement result, it is isolated.Calculate residual error respectively
&epsiv; Gi = | &Sigma; j = 1 m g i - A i &Sigma; j = 1 m ( &omega; S ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) * &Delta;t ) | i=1,2,3,4 (7)
Work as ε gibe greater than setting threshold value r g0time, then gyro i fault.
B.3 individual gyro+2 star sensors
When gyro number be 3, star sensor number be 2 time, first to star sensor, whether fault detects.If the quick three-axis attitude angular velocity recorded of star is respectively ω s1=[ω s1x, ω s1y, ω s1z] ' and ω s2=[ω s2x, ω s2y, ω s2z] ', calculates ε according to formula (4) 12if, ε 12< r s0then illustrate that two stars are quick working properly, if otherwise ε 12> r s0then illustrate to there is the quick fault of star.
If star sensor is all normal, by star sensor measurement result, fault detect and isolation is carried out to gyro, calculate residual error respectively
&epsiv; Gi = | &Sigma; j = 1 m g i - A i &Sigma; j = 1 m ( &omega; S 1 ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) + &omega; S 2 ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) ) * &Delta;t / 2 | i=1,2,3 (8)
Work as ε gibe greater than setting threshold value r g0time, then gyro i fault.
If star sensor exists fault, under single fault hypothesis, by gyro to measure result, it is isolated.The measured value calculating detector three axis angular rate ω of 3 gyros is utilized according to formula (1) ijk=[ω ijkxω ijkyω ijkz] ', then calculates residual error respectively:
&epsiv; Si = | &Sigma; j = 1 m ( &omega; Six ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) - &omega; ijkx ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) ) | + | &Sigma; j = 1 m ( &omega; Siy ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) - &omega; ijky ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) ) |
+ | &Sigma; j = 1 m ( &omega; Siz ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) - &omega; ijkz ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) ) | i=1,2 (9)
Δ t control cycle in formula, t 0for calculating initial time, m is cumulative number.
Work as ε sibe greater than setting threshold value r s0time, then the quick i fault of star.
4. the momenttum wheel based on input/output relation is diagnosed
If t momenttum wheel input control order is U wt (), then in the m* Δ t time, the theoretical variable quantity of momenttum wheel angular momentum is &Delta;H = &Sigma; i = 1 m ( &Delta;U ( t 0 + i * &Delta;t ) * K ) , Wherein Δ U (t) is for t-1 is to the variable quantity of t input instruction.The theoretical variable quantity that therefore can calculate momenttum wheel rotating speed is Δ ω w=Δ H/I w.Residual error is obtained according to momenttum wheel actual change amount and theoretical variable quantity
ε w=|Δω w-(ω w(t 0+mΔt)-ω w(t 0))| (10)
Work as ε wbe greater than threshold value r w0time, then think momenttum wheel fault.
(3) Methods for Diagnosing System Level Malfunctions
When not meeting the redundancy condition of component level diagnosis, needing to introduce the star dynamics of detector and kinematics, utilizing the Analysis design between sensor, topworks, the mathematical model of controller and dynamics, kinematics to carry out Methods for Diagnosing System Level Malfunctions.Because momenttum wheel can be diagnosed by the direct redundancy based on input and output, often do not need to be placed on system-level diagnosis.
System level diagnostic is often used for not meeting component level conditions for diagnostics, and GNC system is not the situation of minimum system.Here minimum system refers to the system that sensor, topworks do not exist redundancy.As a kind of typical case, analyze the situation that sensor comprises the quick and 1 group of thruster (containing the positive negative direction of three axles) of 3 gyros, 1 star here, other situations can utilize above-mentioned thought to carry out similarity analysis.
For the situation of quick+1 group thruster of 3 gyros+1 star (containing the positive negative direction of three axles), first utilize the measured value calculating detector three axis angular rate ω of 3 gyros according to formula (1) ijk=[ω ijkxω ijkyω ijkz] ', then by following formula detect sensor whether there is fault:
&epsiv; S = | &Sigma; j = 1 m ( &omega; Sx ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) - &omega; ijkx ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) ) | + | &Sigma; j = 1 m ( &omega; Sy ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) - &omega; ijky ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) ) |
+ | &Sigma; j = 1 m ( &omega; Sz ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) - &omega; ijkz ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) ) | - - - ( 11 )
Δ t control cycle in formula, t 0for calculating initial time, m is cumulative number.
Work as ε sbe greater than setting threshold value r s0time, then there is fault in sensor, otherwise sensor is normal.
On this basis, drawing-in system kinetics equation:
I x &omega; x = 1 S [ ( I y - I z ) &omega; y &omega; z + u x , r ]
I y &omega; y = 1 S [ ( I z - I x ) &omega; z &omega; x + u y , r ] - - - ( 12 )
I z &omega; z = 1 S [ ( I x - I y ) &omega; x &omega; y + u z , r ]
u x,r=u x+Δu x
u y,r=u y+Δu y(13)
u z,r=u z+Δu z
Wherein I=diag (I x, I y, I z) be detector inertia battle array, u r=[u x, ru y, ru z, r] ' be working control moment, u=[u xu yu z] ' be the desired control moment that controller sends, can be obtained by controller.Δ u=[Δ u xΔ u yΔ u zthe deviation of] ' be between working control moment and desired control moment, normal condition is in a small amount.
When sensor exists fault, make Δ u=0, by u=[u xu yu z] ' substitute into formula (12) calculates the theoretical angular velocity omega of three axles t=[ω tx, ω ty, ω tz] ', is by following formula isolated fault sensor:
&epsiv; Gi = | &Sigma; j = 1 m g i - A i &Sigma; j = 1 m &omega; t ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) * &Delta;t | i=1,2,3 (14)
&epsiv; S = | &Sigma; j = 1 m ( &omega; Sx ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) - &omega; tx ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) ) | + | &Sigma; j = 1 m ( &omega; Sy ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) - &omega; ty ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) ) |
+ | &Sigma; j = 1 m ( &omega; Sz ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) - &omega; tz ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) ) | - - - ( 15 )
Δ t control cycle in formula, t 0for calculating initial time, m is cumulative number.
Work as ε gibe greater than setting threshold value r g0time, then there is fault in i-th gyro.
Work as ε sbe greater than setting threshold value r s0time, then there is fault in star sensor.
When sensor is all normal, make Δ u=0, by u=[u xu yu z] ' substitute into formula (12) calculates the theoretical angular velocity omega of three axles t=[ω tx, ω ty, ω tz] ', is by following formula isolated fault sensor:
&epsiv; T = &epsiv; Tx &epsiv; Ty &epsiv; Tz = | &Sigma; j = 1 m &omega; t ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) - &Sigma; j = 1 m inv ( A i A j A k ) g i ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) / &Delta;t g j ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) / &Delta;t g k ( t 0 + j * &Delta;t ) / &Delta;t | - - - ( 16 )
Work as ε tx, ε ty, ε tzbe greater than setting threshold value r t0time, then there is fault in the thruster in respective direction.
(4) based on the fault detect of jet time constraint
When detecting as minimum system, only carrying out fault detect, no longer carrying out fault isolation.During detector stable operation, with t 0moment starts the jet time of the positive negative direction of three axles in the accumulative m* Δ t time, if the accumulative jet time in any direction exceedes setting threshold value r t0, then there is fault in system.
The content be not described in detail in instructions of the present invention belongs to the known technology of those skilled in the art.

Claims (3)

1. deep space probe GNC system layer method for automatic fault diagnosis, is characterized in that step is as follows:
(1) according to component failure modes analysis (FMEA) result, fault-measuring point incidence matrix is set up; The self-inspection information, the analog quantity telemetry intelligence (TELINT) that there is provided according to GNC various parts and carry out fault diagnosis according to fault-measuring point incidence matrix, if uniquely can determine fault mode according to fault-measuring point incidence matrix, then this fault mode is diagnostic result; Otherwise go to step (2) and carry out component level fault diagnosis;
(2) utilize the consistance of the redundancy relationship between GNC system sensitive device and topworks's input/output relation to carry out fault diagnosis, obtain the parts broken down; If do not meet redundancy relationship to go to step (3) and carry out Methods for Diagnosing System Level Malfunctions;
(3) judge whether GNC system is minimum system, if not minimum system, then first utilizing the redundancy relationship of sensor or topworks to judge is sensor failure or actuator failure, again the theoretical control moment that controller produces is substituted into dynamics and the kinematical equation of detector, resolve the theoretical angular velocity of detector, the consistance according to theoretical angular velocity and sensor measured angular speed diagnoses out the parts specifically broken down; Otherwise go to step (4); Described minimum system is sensor, topworks does not exist redundancy;
(4) jet time of accumulative thruster three axle all directions, in official hour, if the accumulative jet time of three axle either directions exceedes the threshold value preset, then there is fault in GNC system, otherwise GNC system is normal.
2. deep space probe GNC system layer method for automatic fault diagnosis according to claim 1, is characterized in that: described component level fault diagnosis mainly comprise diagnose based on the gyro in odd even space, star sensor diagnosis, gyro and star sensor Combining diagnosis and the momenttum wheel fault diagnosis based on input and output direct redundancy.
3. deep space probe GNC system layer method for automatic fault diagnosis according to claim 2, it is characterized in that: described gyro and star sensor Combining diagnosis are applicable to gyro and star sensor quantity summation when being more than or equal to 5, and single fault occurs hypothesis, diagnosis algorithm is as follows:
(2.1) when gyro quantity is 4, according to the consistance that each gyro exports, judge that whether gyro is abnormal, if export consistent, then gyro is all normal, otherwise gyro exists abnormal, goes to step (2.3);
(2.2) when star sensor quantity is 2, according to the consistance that each star sensor exports, judge that whether star sensor is abnormal, if export consistent, then star sensor is normal, otherwise star sensor is abnormal, goes to step (2.3);
(2.3) when gyro or any one parts of star sensor exist abnormal, then the consistance of the angular velocity recorded according to gyro and star sensor, determines trouble unit.
CN201210504945.8A 2012-11-30 2012-11-30 Layering fault autonomic diagnostic method of global navigation chart (GNC) system of deep space probe Active CN102999042B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201210504945.8A CN102999042B (en) 2012-11-30 2012-11-30 Layering fault autonomic diagnostic method of global navigation chart (GNC) system of deep space probe

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201210504945.8A CN102999042B (en) 2012-11-30 2012-11-30 Layering fault autonomic diagnostic method of global navigation chart (GNC) system of deep space probe

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN102999042A CN102999042A (en) 2013-03-27
CN102999042B true CN102999042B (en) 2015-07-08

Family

ID=47927735

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201210504945.8A Active CN102999042B (en) 2012-11-30 2012-11-30 Layering fault autonomic diagnostic method of global navigation chart (GNC) system of deep space probe

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN102999042B (en)

Families Citing this family (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103699117B (en) * 2013-12-18 2017-02-08 中广核核电运营有限公司 Method and system for diagnosing failure based on actual working conditions of nuclear power plant and simulation system
CN103759740B (en) * 2014-01-03 2015-07-08 北京控制工程研究所 Gyro failure autonomous diagnostic method of inspector in static state
CN103940451B (en) * 2014-04-30 2016-08-24 北京控制工程研究所 Redundancy fault location of single redundant gyroscopes method based on the autonomous optimized choice of kernel vector
CN104061928B (en) * 2014-06-26 2017-05-03 北京控制工程研究所 Method for automatically and preferentially using star sensor information
CN104898678B (en) * 2015-03-30 2017-06-06 北京航天自动控制研究所 A kind of redundant diagnostic method of carrier rocket flight control
CN106643808A (en) * 2017-01-22 2017-05-10 上海航天控制技术研究所 Multi-grade fault diagnosis method of in-orbit data of star sensor
CN107515613A (en) * 2017-08-20 2017-12-26 南京理工大学 A kind of cube star sensor fault tolerant control method
CN107719701B (en) * 2017-09-07 2019-12-20 北京空间飞行器总体设计部 Spacecraft final assembly process risk analysis method and system
CN110031871B (en) * 2019-02-21 2023-04-11 中国西安卫星测控中心 Momentum wheel fault detection method based on voltage and angular momentum relationship
CN110861786B (en) * 2019-11-06 2021-05-11 上海卫星工程研究所 Jet control safety diagnosis method, system, device and medium for spacecraft thruster
CN111174812B (en) * 2020-01-19 2020-12-18 北京空间飞行器总体设计部 Satellite star sensor constant output abnormity autonomous diagnosis method
CN111625931B (en) * 2020-04-28 2023-11-10 北京控制工程研究所 Spacecraft control executing mechanism abnormality detection method based on angular momentum conservation
CN111912429B (en) * 2020-07-20 2022-08-12 北京控制工程研究所 Abnormal detection method for different parts of spacecraft attitude control system
CN112083645B (en) * 2020-07-30 2024-05-03 上海航天控制技术研究所 Method for managing redundant mode of thruster, shielding faults and recovering faults autonomously
CN114879707B (en) * 2022-03-25 2023-03-10 北京航天飞行控制中心 Deep space spacecraft fault handling method and device and storage medium

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6681182B2 (en) * 2002-02-01 2004-01-20 The Aerospace Corporation Fault detection pseudo gyro
US20050114023A1 (en) * 2003-11-26 2005-05-26 Williamson Walton R. Fault-tolerant system, apparatus and method
CN101590918B (en) * 2009-06-19 2012-01-11 上海微小卫星工程中心 Method for automatic fault diagnosis of satellite and diagnostic system thereof
CN102176159B (en) * 2011-02-28 2013-05-01 哈尔滨工业大学 Satellite attitude control system failure diagnosis device and method based on state observer and equivalent space
CN102735877B (en) * 2012-06-18 2014-02-19 北京控制工程研究所 Optimization method for measuring point of measuring sensor for satellite angular rate based on correlation matrix

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN102999042A (en) 2013-03-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN102999042B (en) Layering fault autonomic diagnostic method of global navigation chart (GNC) system of deep space probe
CN103034232B (en) Automatic failure handling and protection method of deep space probe global navigation chart (GNC) system base on layered structure
CN103676941B (en) Satellite control system method for diagnosing faults based on kinematics and dynamics modeling
CN107121961B (en) A kind of spacecraft attitude fault tolerant control method based on iterative learning interference observer
US8775009B2 (en) Fault detector and fault detection method for attitude control system of spacecraft
CN103676918B (en) A kind of satellite executing mechanism method for diagnosing faults based on Unknown Input Observer
Lu et al. Nonlinear aircraft sensor fault reconstruction in the presence of disturbances validated by real flight data
CN111061247A (en) Polarity test system and test method for closed-loop control of angular momentum of flywheel under whole satellite
CN103389088A (en) Determination method of optimal configuration scheme of four-redundancy strapdown inertial navigation system (RFINS)
CN103884340B (en) A kind of information fusion air navigation aid of survey of deep space fixed point soft landing process
CN112046783A (en) Flight control method and system of three-IMU redundancy technology
CN111913470B (en) Spacecraft control system data validity identification method
CN102735259A (en) Satellite control system fault diagnosis method based on multiple layer state estimators
CN108423195B (en) Mars surrounding device and method for establishing full-attitude gyro-free ground communication link of surrounding device
Fourlas et al. Model based actuator fault diagnosis for a mobile robot
CN110567457A (en) Inertial navigation self-detection system based on redundancy
Han et al. Quadratic-Kalman-filter-based sensor fault detection approach for unmanned aerial vehicles
Shakouri et al. Fault detection and isolation of satellite gyroscopes using relative positions in formation flying
CN103699121A (en) Analytical redundancy relationship-based diagnosability determination method for satellite control system sensors
Denis et al. Thousand times through the atmosphere of Mars: Aerobraking the ExoMars trace gas orbiter
Baldi et al. Combined geometric and neural network approach to generic fault diagnosis in satellite reaction wheels
Bouibed et al. Sensor and actuator fault detection and isolation using two model based approaches: Application to an autonomous electric vehicle
CN103439974A (en) Satellite posture determining system hardware reconfigurability measurement method
Odendaal An analysis and comparison of two methods for UAV actuator fault detection and isolation
Baldi et al. Combined singular perturbations and nonlinear geometric approach to FDI in satellite actuators and sensors

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
C14 Grant of patent or utility model
GR01 Patent grant