CN102802176B - Network optimizing method based on track comparison - Google Patents
Network optimizing method based on track comparison Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN102802176B CN102802176B CN201210262015.6A CN201210262015A CN102802176B CN 102802176 B CN102802176 B CN 102802176B CN 201210262015 A CN201210262015 A CN 201210262015A CN 102802176 B CN102802176 B CN 102802176B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- test
- drive test
- working group
- drive
- route
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Landscapes
- Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a network optimizing method based on track comparison, comprising the following steps of: pre-dividing sub working areas by an experienced circuit testing administrator, and planning a pre-set testing circuit for each sub working area according to conditions of terrains, buildings and road conditions in the sub working areas and a base station configuration condition; and monitoring a condition of an actual circuit test completed by each circuit test working group, and sieving a circuit test result. With the adoption of the network optimizing method, automatic distribution and management to a circuit testing mission and monitoring of a circuit testing process can be realized, so that data finally obtained by a circuit test are reliable and effective.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of network optimized approach, relate in particular to a kind of network optimized approach based on track comparison.
Background technology
Mobile communication technology has not only brought conveniently user to experience, and abundant type of service, has also brought the complexity of the network planning and optimization simultaneously.The quality of mobile communications network is to pass judgment on by the effect that terminal is carried out miscellaneous service by user.Therefore network is optimized, is improved network quality, become the important step of mobile communications network development.The basic procedure of mobile communication network optimization is roughly divided into double teacher: optimize preparation, data acquisition, data analysis, enforcement optimization and optimize assessment.Mobile communication network performance is generally reflected by indexs such as wireless coverage, call completing rate, cutting off rate, speech quality, power system capacities.The actual value of these indexs is measured and collected is the basis of mobile communication network optimization, and the measurement of these indexs and collection realize by drive test conventionally.Therefore, drive test is the important means of the network optimization, quality that can the existing network of direct feeling, for other staff provide first hand data, for reflection network condition, embody network performance index and play direct measurement assessment effect, and can point out network problem place.Drive test parameter generally comprises pilot tone coverage test, switches index, data service performance test, business function test etc.
Drive test is selected several representative regions in actual commercial mobile communication network conventionally: High-Density Urban Area, city expressway and highway etc., carry out respectively the test under corresponding travel speed.Content is generally divided into following a few part: idle pulley test, call out keep for a long time, switch test, fixed test, terminal caller and called call successful rate.
Before carrying out actual drive test, conventionally should be according to statistical analysis, determine the region that need to carry out the network optimization, comprise coverage hole, many pilot tones overlay area, the problematic region of customer complaint and Zone switched etc., then drive in a vehicle to, at definite area, carry out suitable test, for example dialing, speaking test guarantees that test can reappear fault as far as possible.When testing, staff tackles that valuable data are carried out comprehensively, effective record.Such as measuring the pilot tone of forward channel and the FER of front reverse link etc.After having completed measurement, then record data are analyzed, the reason that problem identificatioin occurs, provides more feasible solution.For coverage hole, many pilot tones overlay area, network optimization personnel can determine its coverage by drive test, for switch test, should determine as far as possible the place that handoff failure occurs, and reappear handoff failure.
The task of the network optimization comprises call drop and access failure rate, the rational pilot distribution of switching (direct-cut operation, soft handover, More Soft Handoff and baton handover), evenly rational load of base station, the best etc. that obtain best system covering, minimum.The parameter of optimizing has transmitting power, aerial position (azimuth, angle of declination and height), adjacent area table and the pilot tone order of priority thereof of every sector, the size of adjacent area pilot set search window, handoff threshold value etc.
As can be seen here, the test data that drive test obtains is directly connected to the final effect of the network optimization.Because drive test route selection exists certain randomness, depend on to a great extent the experience of carrying out drive test technical staff self.If drive test personnel's experience is sufficient not or selection schemer is incorrect at the scene, very likely cannot, by the drive test place of pinpointing the problems comprehensively, directly have influence on the network optimization effect in later stage.
Summary of the invention
In view of this, main purpose of the present invention is to provide a kind of network optimized approach based on track comparison, can realize automatic distributing for drive test task, management and for the monitoring of drive test process, guarantees that drive test finally obtains the reliable of data and effectively.
In order to achieve the above object, technical scheme of the present invention is achieved in that
A network optimized approach based on track comparison, is characterized in that, comprises the following steps:
Steps A: the region that need to carry out drive test in electronic chart is divided into some sub-working regions, according to the landform in each sub-working region, building, road conditions and the default test route of base station facilities planning, continues execution step B;
Step B: corresponding every sub-working region generates test assignment, and is stored in the test assignment queue to be allocated in drive test management system, each test assignment, to there being the geographical location information of sub-working region separately, continues execution step C;
Step C: drive test work group member is with the name of drive test working group, by testing equipment, use registered account and password login drive test management system, after login drive test management system, testing equipment reports current residing geographical location information automatically, continues execution step D;
Step D: according to the sequencing of each drive test working group login, set up queue queue of drive test working group in drive test management system; Drive test management system is followed successively by each drive test working group in queue queue of drive test working group according to the far and near allocation for test task of the distance of the sub-working region of distance, until all test assignments are assigned or queue queue in the drive test working group that do not waited in line, continue execution step E;
Step e: be assigned with after current test assignment, drive test management system to the testing equipment of corresponding drive test working group, continues execution step F by the default test route corresponding to current test assignment and relevant data distributing;
Step F: drive test work group member tests according to the sub-working region having issued in testing equipment and default test route, continues execution step G;
Step G: in test process, reach specific degrees if actual test route departs from default test route, perform step P; Otherwise continue execution step H;
Step H: after current test assignment is finished, drive test working group sends current test assignment by testing equipment to drive test management system and has completed information, the information of all test datas of current acquisition, actual test route and current residing geographical location information are sent to drive test management system, continue execution step I;
I step: drive test management system receives after the test data of drive test working group transmission, compares actual test route and default test route, if comparison result is consistent, continues execution step I1; If comparison result is inconsistent, continue execution step I2;
Step I1: drive test management system sends to the testing equipment of drive test working group the message that current test assignment completes, judges whether drive test working group wishes to receive new test assignment again, is to continue to perform step I12; Otherwise continue execution step I11;
Step I11: drive test working group exits current login, completes this test assignment, jumps to step V;
Step I12: drive test working group request drive test management system is further distributed new test assignment, continues execution step R;
Step I2: drive test management system is sent the uncompleted message of current test assignment to the testing equipment of drive test working group, if this drive test working group response continues to carry out the message of current test assignment, continues to jump to step F; If this drive test working group does not respond the message that continues to carry out current test assignment, continue to jump to step Q;
Step P: testing equipment produces alarm signal, and the situation that will depart from reports drive test management system; Test and management system receives after the alarm signal that testing equipment produces, judge whether drive test working group is got back to produce the position of departing from before default test route and restart to test, and be to perform step P1; Otherwise execution step P2;
Step P1: testing equipment record departs from the route of part and the test route retesting; Continue execution step G;
Step P2: testing equipment reports the current test assignment of drive test management system to carry out unsuccessfully, and reports current geographical location information, continues execution step Q;
Step Q: current test assignment comes back to test assignment queue to be allocated, continues execution step S;
Step R: current drive test working group comes back to queue queue of drive test working group, continues execution step S;
Step S: drive test management system detects in test assignment queue to be allocated whether still have unappropriated task, if had, performs step T; If, do not perform step U;
Step T: if the quantity of unappropriated task is less than the drive test working group quantity of the medium task to be allocated of queue queue of drive test working group in test assignment queue to be allocated, execution step T1; If in test assignment queue to be allocated the quantity of unappropriated task more than or equal the drive test working group quantity of the medium task to be allocated of queue queue of drive test working group, execution step T2;
Step T1: the sequencing of queuing up according to the drive test working group of the medium task to be allocated of queue queue of drive test working group, for each drive test working group distributes nearest sub-working region; Continue execution step E;
Step T2: be every sub-working region nearest drive test working group of chosen distance according to the geographical location information of sub-working region corresponding to unallocated task; Continue execution step E;
Step U: all drive tests working group in queue queue of drive test management equipment notice drive test working group, current test assignment is finished, logs off, execution step V;
Step V: finish.
Preferably, for the positive and negative twocouese of selected test route, carry out drive test.
Preferably, described actual test route departs from default test route and reaches specific degrees and refer to, actual test route departs from default test route and reaches preset distance, or the time that actual test route departs from default test route reaches scheduled duration.
Preferably, actual test route departs from preset distance that default test route reaches for over 20 meters.
Preferably, the time that actual test route departs from default test route reaches scheduled duration for over 5 minutes.
Accompanying drawing explanation:
Fig. 1 is drive test management system in embodiment of the present invention and the structural representation of testing equipment.
Fig. 2-A, Fig. 2-B and Fig. 2-C are the flow charts of the network optimized approach based on track comparison in embodiment of the present invention.
Embodiment
Basic thought of the present invention is to divide in advance sub-working region by veteran drive test administrative staff, and be that every sub-working region is according to the landform in sub-working region, building, road conditions and the default test route of base station facilities planning, and monitor for the situation that each drive test working group completes actual drive test, for drive test result, screen, thereby effectively guarantee that the drive test of mobile communications network carries out accurately and efficiently.
In order to make the object, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention clearer, by the following examples and with reference to accompanying drawing, the present invention is described in more detail.
Fig. 1 is drive test management system in the specific embodiment of the invention and the structural representation of testing equipment.As shown in the figure, drive test management system comprises processing unit, memory cell, display unit, man-machine interaction unit and wireless transmit/receive units.Drive test administrative staff can be satisfied the need and be surveyed management system and be configured by man-machine interaction unit.The wireless transmit/receive units of drive test management system is for sending test assignment and various command informations etc. to each testing equipment, and to receiving geographical location information that road measuring device reports, test data and for the response message of various command informations etc.Memory cell is for preserving the various data relevant to drive test process, the electronic chart in drive test region for example, the division of each sub-working region, the geography information such as the landform in each sub-working region, building, road conditions, base station facilities, default test route; And the information such as queue queue of drive test working group.Various instruction process and the data processing of drive test management system complete by processing unit.
Testing equipment has test cell, memory cell, locating module, screen, man-machine interaction unit and wireless transmit/receive units.Between testing equipment and drive test management system, can carry out two-way communication by wireless mode.The wireless transmit/receive units of testing equipment is for receive test assignment and various command informations etc. from drive test management system, and reports geographical location information, test data and for the response message of various command informations etc. to drive test management system.Memory cell is for preserving the various data relevant to drive test process, and the electronic chart of sub-working region for example, is preset test route at the geography information such as the landform in each sub-working region, building, road conditions, base station facilities; The test data recording in drive test process, geographical location information and with mutual various instruction messages of drive test management system etc.Various instruction process, data processing and the test assignment of testing equipment complete by processing unit.
Fig. 2-A, 2-B and 2-C are according to the flow chart of the network optimized approach based on track comparison of the present invention.Because paper length is limit, flow chart is divided into Fig. 2-A, 2-B and 2-C draws, and distinguishes the tie point between presentation graphs 2-A, 2-B and 2-C in first, the second with circle wherein, third, fourth, penta, oneself, heptan.
As shown in Fig. 2-A to Fig. 2-C, the network optimized approach based on track comparison according to the present invention comprises the following steps:
Steps A: the region that need to carry out drive test in electronic chart is divided into some sub-working regions, according to the landform in each sub-working region, building, road conditions and the default test route of base station facilities planning.The division of sub-working region can be according to the general assignment amount of test, and the personnel placement and the schedule requirement that participate in test are divided flexibly.In every sub-working region, due to the difference of landform, building, road conditions and base station facilities, therefore cannot carry out actual drive test according to unified drive test route.Simultaneously, because the drive test work group member who carries out drive test for every sub-working region forms difference, aspect drive test experience, there is certain difference, for fear of the impact bringing for drive test data due to individual difference, in advance by veteran drive test personnel or system operator in drive test management system, be well default test route of every sub-working region pre-planning.Default test route can comprise twice route that come and go to same circuit.Continue execution step B.
Step B: corresponding every sub-working region generates test assignment, and is stored in the test assignment queue to be allocated in drive test management system, and each test assignment is to there being the geographical location information of sub-working region separately.The geographical location information of sub-working region can comprise the latitude and longitude information on border, sub-working region, and the landform in sub-working region, building, road conditions and base station arrange.Continue execution step C.
Step C: drive test work group member, with the name of drive test working group, uses registered account and password login drive test management system by testing equipment, after login drive test management system, testing equipment reports current residing geographical location information automatically.Each drive test working group can include a plurality of members, but must login with the name of current drive test working group when login drive test management system, rather than adopts personally and login.Testing equipment can have the locating module such as GPS module, can automatically gather current residing geographical location information, and have wireless communication module, the geographical location information of current collection can be reported to drive test management system.Continue execution step D.
Step D: according to the sequencing of each drive test working group login, set up queue queue of drive test working group in drive test management system; Drive test management system is followed successively by each drive test working group in queue queue of drive test working group according to the far and near allocation for test task of the distance of the sub-working region of distance, until all test assignments are assigned or queue queue in the drive test working group that do not waited in line.The geographical location information that the testing equipment that drive test management system is held according to each drive test working group reports, and the geographical location information of each sub-working region of preserving in drive test management system, the distance of calculating each drive test working group and every sub-working region is far and near.For any one drive test working group, it can not be identical with the distance between optional position in sub-working region.For the purpose of unification, the distance of the beeline having between the optional position in a certain drive test working group and a certain sub-working region between the sub-working region of current drive test working group and current calculating.Continue execution step E.Shown in Fig. 2-A, via tie point first, proceeding to the step e in Fig. 2-B.
Step e: be assigned with after current test assignment, drive test management system by the default test route corresponding to current test assignment and relevant data distributing to the testing equipment of corresponding drive test working group.Described relevant data can comprise the electronic chart of sub-working region, and the landform in this sub-working region, building, road conditions and base station facilities etc.Continue execution step F.
Step F: drive test work group member tests according to the sub-working region having issued in testing equipment and default test route, continues execution step G.
Step G: in test process, reach specific degrees if actual test route departs from default test route, perform step P; Otherwise continue execution step H; Described actual test route departs from default test route and reaches specific degrees and refer to, actual test route departs from default test route and reaches preset distance, or the time that actual test route departs from default test route reach scheduled duration, this duration is for example 5 minutes.Described actual test route departs from default test route and reaches preset distance and refer to the residing positional distance of current time last does not depart from the distance of the position of default test route, and this predeterminable range is for example 20 meters.
Step H: after current test assignment is finished, drive test working group sends current test assignment by testing equipment to drive test management system and has completed information, the information of all test datas of current acquisition, actual test route and current residing geographical location information are sent to drive test management system, continue execution step I.
I step: drive test management system receives after the test data of drive test working group transmission, compares actual test route and default test route if comparison result is consistent, proceeds to and continues the step I1 shown in execution graph 2-C via tie point second as shown in Fig. 2-B; If comparison result is inconsistent, as shown in Fig. 2-B, via tie point third, proceeds to and continue the step I2 shown in execution graph 2-C.When comparing, drive test management system can set in advance some comparison tolerances, when actual test route and default test route depart within the specific limits time think that comparison result remains consistent, only have when departing from of actual test route and default test route and exceeded and compare tolerance and think that comparison result is inconsistent.This comparison tolerance can account for for the path length departing from the percentage of total test route length.For example, if comparison tolerance is set to 2%, when total test route length is 100 kilometers, there is the path length of 1.5 kilometers to depart from default test route, the percentage that accounts for total test route length due to the path length departing from is 1.5%, lower than set comparison tolerance 2%, therefore assert that comparison result is consistent in such cases.Further, drive test management system can set in advance some and depart from tolerance, and the distance departing from when actual test route and default test route, lower than departing from tolerance, is not thought and existed and depart between actual test route and default test route.For example, depart from tolerance and be set to 10 meters, when having departed from 5 meters between actual test route and default test route, think and now do not depart from.
Step I1: drive test management system sends to the testing equipment of drive test working group the message that current test assignment completes, judges whether drive test working group wishes to receive new test assignment again, is to continue to perform step I12; Otherwise continue execution step I11.
Step I11: drive test working group exits current login, completes this test assignment, as shown in Fig. 2-C, via tie point fourth, proceeds to and continues the step V shown in execution graph 2-B.
Step I12 drive test working group request drive test management system is further distributed new test assignment, continues execution step R.
Step I2: drive test management system is sent the uncompleted message of current test assignment to the testing equipment of drive test working group, if this drive test working group response continues to carry out the message of current test assignment, as shown in Fig. 2-C, via tie point, jumped to the step F shown in Fig. 2-B; If this drive test working group does not respond message that continue to carry out current test assignment, as shown in Fig. 2-C, via tie point, jump to the step Q shown in Fig. 2-B heptan.Now, because drive test working group responds, continue to carry out current test assignment, can think that this drive test working group and drive test management system have lost to contact, or this drive test working group test assignment of being unwilling to carry out again, therefore, drive test management system is no longer for it distributes new drive test task.When the scheduled duration that reaches out of touch, drive test management system can Jiang Gai drive test working group compulsory withdrawal logging status.After drive test working group is by drive test management system compulsory withdrawal logging status, if also wish to participate in drive test, be assigned with test assignment, need again to login, medium to be allocated in queue queue of drive test working group.For the ease of management, drive test management system can also arrange the higher limit of compulsory withdrawal logging status, if certain drive test working group is forced to the state of logging off and reaches predetermined higher limit, no longer allow over a period to come this working group login drive test management system test assignment of participating in the distribution, the higher limit of compulsory withdrawal logging status wherein and do not allow to arrange by drive test management system the concrete period of login.
Step P: testing equipment produces alarm signal, and the situation that will depart from reports drive test management system; Test and management system receives after the alarm signal that testing equipment produces, judge whether drive test working group is got back to produce the position of departing from before default test route and restart to test, and be to perform step P1; Otherwise execution step P2.Drive test working group gets back to and produces the position depart from before default test route and restart test and refer to, drive test working group gets back to for the first time and to produce the position of departing from before default test route and restart test, thereby guarantees to restart on data that test obtains can continue with the data that test obtains before.
Step P1: testing equipment record departs from the route of part and the test route retesting; Continue execution step G.
Step P2: testing equipment reports the current test assignment of drive test management system to carry out unsuccessfully, and reports current geographical location information, continues execution step Q.
Step Q: current test assignment comes back to test assignment queue to be allocated, continues execution step S;
Step R: current drive test working group comes back to queue queue of drive test working group continues the step S shown in execution graph 2-B via tie point penta as shown in Fig. 2-C.
Step S: drive test management system detects in test assignment queue to be allocated whether still have unappropriated task, if had, performs step T; If, do not perform step U.
Step T: if the quantity of unappropriated task is less than the drive test working group quantity of the medium task to be allocated of queue queue of drive test working group in test assignment queue to be allocated, execution step T1; If in test assignment queue to be allocated the quantity of unappropriated task more than or equal the drive test working group quantity of the medium task to be allocated of queue queue of drive test working group, execution step T2.
Step T1: the sequencing of queuing up according to the drive test working group of the medium task to be allocated of queue queue of drive test working group, for each drive test working group distributes nearest sub-working region; As shown in Fig. 2-B, via tie point first, proceed to execution step E.
Step T2: be every sub-working region nearest drive test working group of chosen distance according to the geographical location information of sub-working region corresponding to unallocated task; As shown in Fig. 2-B, via tie point first, proceed to execution step E.
Step U: all drive tests working group in queue queue of drive test management equipment notice drive test working group, current test assignment is finished, and drive test working group logs off, execution step V.
Step V: finish.
The above; be only the present invention's embodiment preferably, but protection scope of the present invention is not limited to this, is anyly familiar with in technical scope that those skilled in the art disclose in the present invention; the variation that can expect easily or replacement, within all should being encompassed in protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (5)
1. the network optimized approach based on track comparison, is characterized in that, comprises the following steps:
Steps A: the region that need to carry out drive test in electronic chart is divided into some sub-working regions, according to the landform in each sub-working region, building, road conditions and the default test route of base station facilities planning, continues execution step B;
Step B: corresponding every sub-working region generates test assignment, and is stored in the test assignment queue to be allocated in drive test management system, each test assignment, to there being the geographical location information of sub-working region separately, continues execution step C;
Step C: drive test work group member is with the name of drive test working group, by testing equipment, use registered account and password login drive test management system, after login drive test management system, testing equipment reports current residing geographical location information automatically, continues execution step D;
Step D: according to the sequencing of each drive test working group login, set up queue queue of drive test working group in drive test management system; Drive test management system is followed successively by each drive test working group in queue queue of drive test working group according to the far and near allocation for test task of the distance of the sub-working region of distance, until all test assignments are assigned or queue queue in the drive test working group that do not waited in line, continue execution step E;
Step e: be assigned with after current test assignment, drive test management system to the testing equipment of corresponding drive test working group, continues execution step F by the default test route corresponding to current test assignment and relevant data distributing;
Step F: drive test work group member tests according to the sub-working region having issued in testing equipment and default test route, continues execution step G;
Step G: in test process, reach specific degrees if actual test route departs from default test route, perform step P; Otherwise continue execution step H;
Step H: after current test assignment is finished, drive test working group sends current test assignment by testing equipment to drive test management system and has completed information, the information of all test datas of current acquisition, actual test route and current residing geographical location information are sent to drive test management system, continue execution step I;
I step: drive test management system receives after the test data of drive test working group transmission, compares actual test route and default test route, if comparison result is consistent, continues execution step I1; If comparison result is inconsistent, continue execution step I2;
Step I1: drive test management system sends to the testing equipment of drive test working group the message that current test assignment completes, judges whether drive test working group wishes to receive new test assignment again, is to continue to perform step I12; Otherwise continue execution step I11;
Step I11: drive test working group exits current login, completes this test assignment, jumps to step V;
Step I12: drive test working group request drive test management system is further distributed new test assignment, continues execution step R;
Step I2: drive test management system is sent the uncompleted message of current test assignment to the testing equipment of drive test working group, if this drive test working group response continues to carry out the message of current test assignment, continues to jump to step F; If this drive test working group does not respond the message that continues to carry out current test assignment, continue to jump to step Q;
Step P: testing equipment produces alarm signal, and the situation that will depart from reports drive test management system; Test and management system receives after the alarm signal that testing equipment produces, judge whether drive test working group is got back to produce the position of departing from before default test route and restart to test, and be to perform step P1; Otherwise execution step P2;
Step P1: testing equipment record departs from the route of part and the test route retesting; Continue execution step G;
Step P2: testing equipment reports the current test assignment of drive test management system to carry out unsuccessfully, and reports current geographical location information, continues execution step Q;
Step Q: current test assignment comes back to test assignment queue to be allocated, continues execution step S;
Step R: current drive test working group comes back to queue queue of drive test working group, continues execution step S;
Step S: drive test management system detects in test assignment queue to be allocated whether still have unappropriated task, if had, performs step T; If, do not perform step U;
Step T: if the quantity of unappropriated task is less than the drive test working group quantity of the medium task to be allocated of queue queue of drive test working group in test assignment queue to be allocated, execution step T1; If in test assignment queue to be allocated the quantity of unappropriated task more than or equal the drive test working group quantity of the medium task to be allocated of queue queue of drive test working group, execution step T2;
Step T1: the sequencing of queuing up according to the drive test working group of the medium task to be allocated of queue queue of drive test working group, for each drive test working group distributes nearest sub-working region; Continue execution step E;
Step T2: be every sub-working region nearest drive test working group of chosen distance according to the geographical location information of sub-working region corresponding to unallocated task; Continue execution step E;
Step U: all drive tests working group in queue queue of drive test management equipment notice drive test working group, current test assignment is finished, logs off, execution step V;
Step V: finish.
2. the network optimized approach based on track comparison as claimed in claim 1, is characterized in that carrying out drive test for the positive and negative twocouese of selected test route.
3. the network optimized approach based on track comparison as claimed in claim 2, it is characterized in that described actual test route departs from default test route and reaches specific degrees and refer to, actual test route departs from default test route and reaches preset distance, or the time that actual test route departs from default test route reaches scheduled duration.
4. the network optimized approach based on track comparison as claimed in claim 3, is characterized in that actual test route departs from preset distance that default test route reaches for over 20 meters.
5. the network optimized approach based on track comparison as claimed in claim 3, is characterized in that time that actual test route departs from default test route reaches scheduled duration for over 5 minutes.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201210262015.6A CN102802176B (en) | 2012-07-27 | 2012-07-27 | Network optimizing method based on track comparison |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201210262015.6A CN102802176B (en) | 2012-07-27 | 2012-07-27 | Network optimizing method based on track comparison |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN102802176A CN102802176A (en) | 2012-11-28 |
| CN102802176B true CN102802176B (en) | 2014-11-05 |
Family
ID=47201118
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201210262015.6A Active CN102802176B (en) | 2012-07-27 | 2012-07-27 | Network optimizing method based on track comparison |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN102802176B (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104754518A (en) * | 2013-12-31 | 2015-07-01 | 海能达通信股份有限公司 | Field intensity testing method based on private network, server and terminal |
| CN111866715B (en) * | 2020-07-28 | 2023-03-24 | 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 | Control and device for testing unmanned vehicle, signal testing equipment and storage medium |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101415191A (en) * | 2007-10-16 | 2009-04-22 | 北京华恒铭圣科技发展有限责任公司 | Method and apparatus for detecting wireless communication network |
| CN102547579A (en) * | 2012-02-07 | 2012-07-04 | 大唐移动通信设备有限公司 | Method and system of road test |
Family Cites Families (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US8768335B2 (en) * | 2010-01-27 | 2014-07-01 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method of performing a minimization of drive test (MDT) for specific area in wireless communication system |
-
2012
- 2012-07-27 CN CN201210262015.6A patent/CN102802176B/en active Active
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101415191A (en) * | 2007-10-16 | 2009-04-22 | 北京华恒铭圣科技发展有限责任公司 | Method and apparatus for detecting wireless communication network |
| CN102547579A (en) * | 2012-02-07 | 2012-07-04 | 大唐移动通信设备有限公司 | Method and system of road test |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN102802176A (en) | 2012-11-28 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN102781023B (en) | Network optimization method based on time window | |
| CN102149103B (en) | Network optimizing system and method | |
| US7826837B1 (en) | Systems and methods for tracking signal strength in wireless networks | |
| CN108601029B (en) | Base station construction evaluation method and device | |
| CN107705042A (en) | Inspection method and device for power equipment | |
| US20030087635A1 (en) | Method and system for optimizing performance of a mobile communications system | |
| USRE48089E1 (en) | Method and system for automatic coverage assessment for cooperating wireless access networks | |
| CN101431758B (en) | Method and apparatus for predicting user position distribution | |
| CN106576383A (en) | Deployment criteria for unmanned aerial vehicles to improve cellular phone communications | |
| CN101835192B (en) | Method for measuring network signal coverage, network controller and communication system | |
| CN102523037A (en) | Centralized monitoring and managing system for optical cable resources | |
| US11074824B2 (en) | Smart drive testing for mobile network and radio frequency verification | |
| CN108124270B (en) | Coverage evaluation method and device for LTE network | |
| CN102362517A (en) | Radio wave state measurement system, radio wave state measurement method, and storage medium in which radio wave state measurement program is stored | |
| CN108024263A (en) | One kind simulation drive test method and device | |
| CN102802176B (en) | Network optimizing method based on track comparison | |
| CN108260140A (en) | A kind of simulation drive test data acquisition methods and device | |
| CN103491568A (en) | Mobile network road optimized analysis system | |
| CN109996256A (en) | User's migration analysis method, apparatus calculates equipment and storage medium | |
| CN103167537A (en) | Method, system and device for uplink interference measurement | |
| CN108260142B (en) | High-speed rail simulation drive test data acquisition method and device | |
| CN102781024B (en) | Network optimization method based on real time confirmation | |
| CN104918270A (en) | Wireless network parameter obtaining method, apparatus and terminal | |
| CN109743685A (en) | Base station coverage area analysis method, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN108901039A (en) | MPS process situation determines method and device in the region of traffic route |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| C14 | Grant of patent or utility model | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| DD01 | Delivery of document by public notice |
Addressee: Zhejiang Yumai Technology Co.,Ltd. Document name: Notification that Application Deemed not to be Proposed |
|
| C56 | Change in the name or address of the patentee | ||
| CP03 | Change of name, title or address |
Address after: Hangzhou City, Zhejiang province 310004 city of Shen Jia Lu No. 319 room 316 Patentee after: Zhejiang pulse Polytron Technologies Inc Address before: Hangzhou City, Zhejiang province 310004 City Road No. 588, No. 3, Fei Jia Tang floor second West Patentee before: Zhejiang Yumai Technology Co.,Ltd. |