CN102722751B - Heuristic quantum genetic method of multi-target distribution in air war - Google Patents

Heuristic quantum genetic method of multi-target distribution in air war Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN102722751B
CN102722751B CN201210147056.0A CN201210147056A CN102722751B CN 102722751 B CN102722751 B CN 102722751B CN 201210147056 A CN201210147056 A CN 201210147056A CN 102722751 B CN102722751 B CN 102722751B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
aircraft
enemy
chromosome
represent
beta
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
CN201210147056.0A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN102722751A (en
Inventor
李妮
孔海朋
龚光红
韩亮
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Beihang University
Original Assignee
Beihang University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Beihang University filed Critical Beihang University
Priority to CN201210147056.0A priority Critical patent/CN102722751B/en
Publication of CN102722751A publication Critical patent/CN102722751A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN102722751B publication Critical patent/CN102722751B/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Abstract

The invention provides a heuristic quantum genetic method of multi-target distribution in an air war and belongs to the technical field of computer simulation and method optimization. The heuristic quantum genetic method comprises the following steps: obtaining the current battlefield situation from a command control center; obtaining threat factors among aircrafts between us and the enemy of the current battlefield; obtaining all of attack distribution values of each weapon of the aircrafts of ourselves and establishing a priority attack distribution value vector; carrying out quantum bit encoding and initializing all quantum chromosomes in a population; filtering the quantum chromosomes; and correcting the quantum chromosomes according to the priority attack distribution value vector. According to the heuristic quantum genetic method, a threat empirical formula of collaborative multi-target attack air war decision problem is subjected to deformation conversion, a distribution scheme of the weapons of us is subjected to quantum bit encoding, and the representation range of feasible solution is enlarged. The priority attack distribution value vector PAVZN*1 is provided and designed according to all of the attack distribution values of each weapon, thus the quantum chromosomes are corrected in a heuristic mode according to the PAVZN*1, and the convergence velocity is accelerated.

Description

A kind of heuristic quantum genetic method that air battle multiple goal is distributed
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of heuristic quantum genetic method that air battle multiple goal is distributed, belong to Computer Simulation and method optimisation technique field.
Background technology
Oneself becomes Air Combat Decision-Making for Cooperative Multiple Target Attack modern opportunity of combat and realizes one of gordian technique of over-the-horizon air action fire control system, and its research has great importance.Air Combat Decision-Making for Cooperative Multiple Target Attack refers to that independent or many aircraft of aircraft attack aerial multiple enemy's discrete target simultaneously.In the time that enemy's number of vehicles is more, we also needs to set out many aircraft simultaneously it is tackled, is attacked, thereby forms Cooperative Air Combat.The key of Air Combat Decision-Making for Cooperative Multiple Target Attack is to be that each friend side aircraft distributes target according to our number of vehicles and situation, and air combat situation assessment and threat analysis are the bases of Target Assignment.Therefore, air combat situation assessment, threat analysis, collaborative Target Assignment have formed the core content of Air Combat Decision-Making for Cooperative Multiple Target Attack together, and collaborative Target Assignment is a most important part wherein.
The threat analysis of Air Combat Decision-Making for Cooperative Multiple Target Attack is mainly the experimental formula basic according to some at present, calculates the threat factor between aircraft; The method of collaborative Target Assignment mainly contains the methods such as ant group, neural network, population, but these method ubiquity inefficiencies, the shortcoming such as can not restrain.Genetic algorithm is proposed and found in late 1960s by the John Holland of Michigan university of the U.S., use Biologic evolution opinion and genetic thought, simulate the breeding occurring in natural selection and genetic process, mating and variation phenomenon, according to the survival of the fittest, the natural law of the survival of the fittest, utilizes genetic operator to select, crossover and mutation produces excellent individual by generation, finally searches preferably individual.But the shortcomings such as genetic algorithm is easily absorbed in local convergence in the time solving Air Combat Decision-Making for Cooperative Multiple Target Attack, and later stage of evolution speed of convergence is slow, and precision is poor.Quantum genetic optimization method (QGA) is proposed in 2000 by K.H.Han etc. the earliest, the method is expressed that the state vector of quantum introduce genetic coding, utilize Quantum rotating gate to realize the adjustment of chromogene, its concept is simple, easily realize, hunting zone is large.But its binary coding mode has certain limitation in the time of solving practical problems.In addition, as a kind of random optimization method, also there is blind search, the shortcoming such as speed of convergence is slow, and precision is poor.
Summary of the invention
For problems of the prior art, the present invention proposes a kind of heuristic quantum genetic method that air battle multiple goal is distributed, object is the easy local convergence of the genetic method of the collaborative Target Assignment in order to solve Air Combat Decision-Making for Cooperative Multiple Target Attack, later stage of evolution speed of convergence is slow, the shortcomings such as precision is poor, the threat experimental formula of Air Combat Decision-Making for Cooperative Multiple Target Attack problem is out of shape to conversion, make it our weapon allocative decision (the every item chromosome in heuristic quantum genetic algorithm represents a solution) carry out quantum bit coding here, and propose a kind of according to priority allocation value vector PAV zN × 1heuristic quantum chromosomes modification method, last throughput daughter chromosome variation, accelerates quantum bit corresponding state to global optimum's derotation, improves search efficiency.
The present invention proposes a kind of heuristic quantum genetic method that air battle multiple goal is distributed, and comprises following step:
Step 1: obtain current situation of battlefield from command and control center:
Step 2: obtain the current battlefield threat factor between aircraft between ourselves and the enemy by experimental formula.
We to the threat factor experimental formula of enemy's aircraft is at aircraft:
th ij = ω 1 th ij D ij th ij ϵ ij + ω 2 th ij V Bi - - - ( 1 )
Wherein subscript i represents our aircraft B i(i=1,2 ..., M), wherein M represents the total quantity of our aircraft, subscript j represents enemy's aircraft R j(j=1,2 ..., N), N represents the total quantity of enemy's aircraft, th ijrepresent our aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jthreat factor, represent our aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jdistance threaten the factor, represent our aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jangle threaten the factor, represent our aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jspeed threaten the factor, wherein ω 1with ω 2for non-negative weight coefficient, and meet ω 1+ ω 2=1;
We is aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jdistance threaten the factor be specially:
th ij D ij = 1.0 D ij &le; Ra B 1 - D ij - Ra B Tr B - Ra B Ra B < D ij &le; Tr B 0.0 D ij > Tr B - - - ( 2 )
Wherein: D ijrepresent our aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jdistance, Ra brepresent our aircraft B ithe average effective operating distance of entrained weapon, Tr brepresent the maximum tracking range of our aircraft radars;
We is aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jangle threaten the factor be specially:
th ij &epsiv; ij = e - &lambda; 1 ( &pi;&epsiv; ij / 180 ) &lambda; 2 - - - ( 3 )
Wherein ε ijrepresent enemy's aircraft R jwith respect to we aircraft B ioff-axis angle, λ 1with λ 2for constant λ 1with λ 2generally, between 0 to 10, there is not the relation of mutual restriction in value;
We is aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jspeed threaten the factor be specially:
th ij V Bi = 1.0 V R j < 0.5 V B i 1.5 - V R j / V B i 0.5 V B i < V R j &le; 1.4 V B i 0.1 V R j > 1.4 V B i - - - ( 4 )
Wherein represent our aircraft B ispeed, represent enemy's aircraft R jspeed;
In like manner enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B ithreat experimental formula be:
th ij = &omega; 3 th ji D ji th ji &epsiv; ji + &omega; 4 th ji V Rj - - - ( 5 )
Wherein subscript j represents enemy's aircraft R j, subscript i represents our aircraft B i, th jirepresent enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B ithreat factor, represent enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B idistance threaten the factor, represent enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B iangle threaten the factor, represent enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B ispeed threaten the factor, ω 3with ω 4for non-negative weight coefficient, and meet ω 3+ ω 4=1;
Enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B idistance threaten the factor be specially:
th ji D ji = 1.0 D ji &le; Ra R 1 - D ji - Ra R Tr R - Ra R Ra R < D ji &le; Tr R 0.0 D ji > Tr R - - - ( 6 )
Wherein D jirepresent enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B idistance, Ra rrepresent enemy's aircraft R jthe average effective operating distance of entrained weapon, Tr rrepresent the maximum tracking range of enemy's aircraft radars; Enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B iangle threaten the factor be specially:
th ji &epsiv; ji = e - &lambda; 3 ( &pi;&epsiv; ji / 180 ) &lambda; 4 - - - ( 7 )
Wherein ε jirepresent our aircraft B iwith respect to enemy's aircraft R joff-axis angle, λ 3with λ 4for constant; Enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B ispeed threaten the factor be specially:
th ji V Rj = 1.0 V B i < 0.5 V R j 1.5 - V B i / V R j 0.5 V R j < V B i &le; 1.4 V R j 0.1 V B i > 1.4 V R j - - - ( 8 )
Wherein represent enemy's aircraft R jspeed, represent our aircraft B ispeed;
Step 3: obtain all attack apportioning costs of each weapon of all our aircraft according to apportioning cost experimental formula, build the preferential apportioning cost vector of attacking:
We is aircraft B i(i=1,2 ..., M) and to enemy's aircraft R j(j=1,2 ..., N) apportioning cost experimental formula be:
AV ij = th ij &CenterDot; &Sigma; i = 1 M th ji - - - ( 9 )
Wherein th ijrepresent our aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jthreat factor, represent enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B ithreat, AV ijrepresent our aircraft B iattack enemy's aircraft R jattack apportioning cost;
According to apportioning cost experimental formula (9) calculate our all weapon r (r=1,2 ..., Z) and the aircraft B at this end of institute ithe entirety of all enemy's aircraft is attacked to apportioning cost vector AV zN × 1for
AV ZN×1=[AV 11,AV 12,…,AV 1N,AV 21,…,AV ZN],
Wherein Z is the total quantity of the entrained weapon of our all aircraft, AV 11represent that our carrying arms is numbered 1 aircraft attack enemy aircraft R 1attack apportioning cost, AV 12represent that our carrying arms is numbered 1 aircraft attack enemy aircraft R 2attack apportioning cost, AV 1Nrepresent that our carrying arms is numbered 1 aircraft attack enemy aircraft R nattack apportioning cost, AV 21represent that our carrying arms is numbered 2 aircraft attack enemy aircraft R 1attack apportioning cost, AV zNrepresent that our carrying arms is numbered the aircraft attack enemy aircraft R of Z nattack apportioning cost.Entirety is attacked apportioning cost vector AV zN × 1=[AV 11, AV 12..., AV 1N, AV 21..., AV zN] in comprised the attack apportioning cost of our each weapon to each aircraft of enemy, comprise altogether ZN attack apportioning cost;
Entirety is attacked to apportioning cost vector AV zN × 1a middle ZN AV 11, AV 12..., AV 1N, AV 21..., AV zNattack apportioning cost and arrange according to order from big to small, obtain priority allocation value vector PAV zN × 1, vectorial dimension is ZN × 1;
Step 4: set population scale, greatest iteration step number and variation probability P mto our weapon allocative decision, carry out all quantum chromosomes in quantum bit coding initialization population, wherein population scale is designated as NUM, for chromosomal number in population, greatest iteration step number is designated as MAX, in i our weapon allocative decision, by we weapon r (r ∈ 1,2 ..., Z) and enemy's aircraft of attacking carries out quantum bit coding, the gene segment length of each weapon equals the number N of enemy's aircraft, and therefore in i chromosome, gene position corresponding to we each weapon r is encoded to g i r = [ &alpha; i r 1 &beta; i r 1 | &alpha; i r 2 &beta; i r 2 | . . . | &alpha; i rN &beta; i rN ] , I ∈ 1,2 ... NUM, wherein represent that in i chromosome, we weapon r does not attack enemy's aircraft R 1quantum bit probability amplitude, wherein represent that in i chromosome, we weapon r attacks enemy's aircraft R 1quantum bit probability amplitude, represent that in i chromosome, we weapon r does not attack enemy's aircraft R 2probability amplitude, wherein represent that in i chromosome, we weapon r attacks enemy's aircraft R 2quantum bit probability amplitude, represent that in i chromosome, we weapon r does not attack enemy's aircraft R nquantum bit probability amplitude, wherein represent that in i chromosome, we weapon r attacks enemy's aircraft R nquantum bit probability amplitude, in the item chromosome of our a weapon allocative decision, comprise the gene section of our Z all weapons, therefore a chromosome total length is ZN, being encoded to an of whole chromosome of i our all weapons g i = [ g i 1 | g i 2 | . . . | g i r | . . . | g i Z ] , i &Element; 1,2 , . . . NUM , Comprise z gene section, wherein r gene section is encoded to the gene position coding that we weapon r is corresponding g i r = [ &alpha; i r 1 &beta; i r 1 | &alpha; i r 2 &beta; i r 2 | . . . | &alpha; i rN &beta; i rN ] , i &Element; 1,2 , . . . NUM , Therefore in whole chromosome, include ZN gene position.Right g i = [ g i 1 | g i 2 | . . . | g i r | . . . | g i Z ] , i &Element; 1,2 , . . . NUM In each gene position launch completely according to each gene position coding after, from 1 to ZN serial number, the chromosome after renumbeing is:
g i = [ &alpha; i 1 &beta; i 1 | &alpha; i 2 &beta; i 2 | . . . | &alpha; i ( r - 1 ) &CenterDot; N + j &beta; i ( r - 1 ) &CenterDot; N + j | . . . | &alpha; i Z &CenterDot; N &beta; i Z &CenterDot; N ] = [ &alpha; i 1 &beta; i 1 | &alpha; i 2 &beta; i 2 | . . . | &alpha; i k &beta; i k | . . . | &alpha; i Z &CenterDot; N &beta; i Z &CenterDot; N ] - - - ( 10 ) ;
Wherein i ∈ 1,2 ... NUM, r ∈ 1,2 ..., Z, j ∈ 1,2 ..., N, k=(r-1) N+j and k ∈ 1,2 ..., ZN; represent in i chromosome the 1st, the 2nd ... (r-1) N+j ... ZN gene position do not attacked the quantum bit probability amplitude of enemy's aircraft, represent in i chromosome the 1st, the 2nd ... (r-1) N+j ... ZN gene position attacked the quantum bit probability amplitude of enemy's aircraft;
Each gene position of whole chromosome to our all weapons in population is carried out initialization, makes all gene position &alpha; i 1 &beta; i 1 , &alpha; i 2 &beta; i 2 . . . &alpha; i ( r - 1 ) &CenterDot; N + j &beta; i ( r - 1 ) &CenterDot; N + j . . . &alpha; i N &CenterDot; Z &beta; i N &CenterDot; Z All be initialized as same numerical value thereby make in every chromosome our each weapon attacking enemy aircraft identical with the probability of not attacking enemy's aircraft.
Step 5: quantum chromosomes is filtered to (the method is called observation in quantum calculation), determine the value of each gene position in chromosome;
To chromosome g i = [ &alpha; i 1 &beta; i 1 | &alpha; i 2 &beta; i 2 | . . . | &alpha; i k &beta; i k | . . . | &alpha; i Z &CenterDot; N &beta; i Z &CenterDot; N ] , I ∈ 1,2 ... NUM filters, and with random chance, each gene position of chromosome is carried out to value, produces immediately the random number between 0 to 1, if random number is less than value after k gene position filtered is 1, otherwise is taken as 0, the chromosome g after filtering i' be:
g i &prime; = [ G i 1 | G i 2 | . . . | G i N - Z ] , i &Element; 1,2 , . . . NUM - - - ( 11 )
Wherein or 0 (k ∈ 1,2 ..., NZ), for the chromosome g after filtering ithe ' the k position gene position value, k is NZ the k in gene position;
Step 6: according to preferential attack apportioning cost vector corrected quantum chromosomes.
According to the preferential attack apportioning cost vector PAV obtaining in step 3 zN × 1, successively by the chromosome g after filtering i', i ∈ 1,2 ... the attack apportioning cost AV that NUM calculates according to formula (9) ijlittle and gene location be 0, makes chromosome meet our weapon and only attack enemy's aircraft, and each enemy's aircraft distributes at most 2 weapons to attack;
If the whole chromosome g after filtering i' in number be less than the total number Z of our weapon, according to preferential attack apportioning cost vector PAV zN × 1successively by the whole chromosome g after filtering i' middle attack apportioning cost AV ijlarge and gene location be 1;
Step 7: obtain through the threaten degree of enemy's aircraft to our aircraft after our weapon attacking according to the threat experimental formula after conversion, and find out historical optimum solution;
For the quantum bit coding that filters after stain colour solid gene position in step 4 is corresponded to and threatened in experimental formula, threaten degree objective function is carried out to following conversion:
E = min &Sigma; j = 1 N &Sigma; i = 1 M { th ji &CenterDot; [ &Pi; r = 1 Z ( 1 - th rj ) X rj ] }
= min &Sigma; i = 1 M &Sigma; j = 1 N { th ji &CenterDot; [ &Pi; r = 1 Z ( 1 - th rj ) X rj ] }
= min &Sigma; i = 1 M &Sigma; j = 1 N { th ji &CenterDot; [ &Pi; r = 1 Z ( 1 - th rj ) G j + ( r - 1 ) &CenterDot; N ] } - - - ( 12 )
Wherein: E represents threaten degree objective function, N is the total number of enemy's aircraft, and M is the total number of our aircraft, and Z is the total number of our weapon, G j+ (r-1) Nrepresent N gene position of j+ (r-1) of we the chromosome g' after filtering, j ∈ 1,2 ..., N, r ∈ 1,2 ..., ZN; If gene position G k=1 (k ∈ 1 ... 2, Z, 1, and by the known k=of corresponding relation (r-1) N+j in formula (10), represent that we is numbered the weapon attacking enemy aircraft R of r jif 0 represents that the weapon that we is numbered r do not attack enemy's aircraft R j;
Calculate the chromosome g ' after i article of filtration in population ithe threaten degree target function value E obtaining through formula (12) i, wherein i ∈ 1,2 ..., NUM, as i article of chromosomal current solution, in the current solution of first generation individuality, finds out the current solution of all chromosome E iin minimum value as the historical optimum solution of population, be designated as E b, the chromosome g ' after corresponding filtration ifor filtering chromosome, the optimum of population is designated as g b', corresponding unfiltered chromosome g ifor the optimum chromosome g of population b;
If not first generation individuality, this generation every chromosomal current solution and historical optimum solution compare, if i chromosomal current solution E ibe less than historical optimum solution E b, i.e. E i< E b, by this chromosomal current solution E ivalue give E b, i.e. E b=E i, filter chromosome g by i i' give optimum to filter chromosome g b', i.e. g b'=g i', by i chromosome g igive optimum chromosome g b, g b=g i;
Step 8: all chromosomes in population are carried out to the rotation of quantum door.
&alpha; k , &beta; k , ] = [ cos &theta; k - sin &theta; k sin &theta; k cos &theta; k ] [ &alpha; k &beta; k - - - ( 13 )
With reference to experimental formula (13), wherein α k, β kfor filtering the chromosomal quantum bit probability amplitude that will be rotated in prochromosome gene position, α ' k, β ' kfor filtering postrotational quantum bit probability amplitude in after stain colour solid gene position, θ krepresent quantum rotation angle, inquiry quantum rotation angle θ ktable, is rotated θ in Quantum rotating gate to every chromosome kquestion blank as shown in table 1:
Table 1: θ in Quantum rotating gate kquestion blank
F in above-mentioned table (x) is target function value, is here the threaten degree functional value of enemy's aircraft to our aircraft after our weapon attacking obtaining according to the threat experimental formula (12) after conversion in step 7; S (α kβ k) be θ ksymbol; b kand x krespectively that the optimum obtaining in step 7 filters chromosome g b' and the current filtration chromosome g that will carry out the rotation of quantum door i' (i ∈ 1,2 ..., NUM) k (k ∈ 1,2 ..., ZN) and the value of individual gene position; Through after quantum door rotation, the probability amplitude of k gene position of postrotational chromosome by &alpha; k &beta; k Become &alpha; k , &beta; k , ;
Step 9: filter chromosome g ' according to optimum bwith variation probability P m, all chromosomes in population are carried out to mutation operation;
To the chromosome g in population i(i ∈ 1,2 ..., NUM) and carry out mutation operation, produce first at random a random number P, if P>=P m, the chromogene bit comparison after filtering;
Gene position comparison procedure is: by the chromosome g after filtering i' filter chromosome g ' with optimum bcarry out corresponding gene for relatively, by g ' bmiddle gene position is 1 and g i' gene position that middle gene position is 0 is taken out, if g i' in k (k ∈ 1,2 ..., ZN) and individual gene position is removed, and the chromosome g of corresponding filtered ik gene position probability amplitude meet by g iin two probability amplitudes of k gene position with exchange the g after exchange iin k gene position by &alpha; i k &beta; i k Become &beta; i k &alpha; i k , G iby g i = [ &alpha; i 1 &beta; i 1 | &alpha; i 2 &beta; i 2 | . . . | &alpha; i k &beta; i k | . . . | &alpha; i Z &CenterDot; N &beta; i Z &CenterDot; N ] Become g i = [ &alpha; i 1 &beta; i 1 | &alpha; i 2 &beta; i 2 | . . . | &beta; i k &alpha; i k | . . . | &alpha; i Z &CenterDot; N &beta; i Z &CenterDot; N ] ; If probability amplitude does not exchange;
If P < is P m, chromosome g iskip mutation process;
Step 10: judge whether iterations reaches greatest iteration step number MAX, if do not reach, returns to step 5, continue circulation; If iterations reaches MAX, exit circulation;
Step 11: after step 10 exits circulation, the optimum obtaining filters chromosome g ' bfor the air battle multiple goal allocative decision obtaining.
The invention has the advantages that:
(1) the present invention proposes a kind of heuristic quantum genetic method that air battle multiple goal is distributed, the threat experimental formula of Air Combat Decision-Making for Cooperative Multiple Target Attack problem is out of shape to conversion, our weapon allocative decision is carried out to quantum bit coding, expanded the expression scope of feasible solution;
(2) the present invention proposes a kind of heuristic quantum genetic method that air battle multiple goal is distributed, and according to all attack apportioning costs of each weapon, proposes and design preferential attack apportioning cost vector PAV zN × 1, make chromosome according to PAV zN × 1didactic correction daughter chromosome, convergence speedup speed;
(3) the present invention proposes a kind of heuristic quantum genetic method that air battle multiple goal is distributed, and proposes the Mutation Strategy of the probability amplitude exchange of quantum chromosomes, has accelerated quantum bit corresponding state to global optimum's derotation, improves search efficiency;
(4) the present invention proposes a kind of heuristic quantum genetic method that air battle multiple goal is distributed, and quantum genetic algorithm is applied in air battle multiple goal assignment problem, uses intelligent method to obtain a good air battle multiple goal allocative decision.
Brief description of the drawings
The process flow diagram of the heuristic quantum genetic method that a kind of air battle multiple goal that Fig. 1 the present invention proposes is distributed;
Fig. 2 is quantum door rotation diagram.
Embodiment
Below in conjunction with accompanying drawing, the present invention is described in further detail:
The present invention proposes a kind of heuristic quantum genetic method that air battle multiple goal is distributed, and flow process as shown in Figure 1, comprises following step:
Step 1: obtain current situation of battlefield from command and control center.
Obtain current situation of battlefield from command and control center, current situation of battlefield comprises the average effective operating distance of the position of the entrained weapon quantity of quantity, our every aircraft of our aircraft and enemy's aircraft, all aircraft in current battlefield and attitude, both sides at war's aircraft speed and the maximum tracking range of radar, the entrained weapon of both sides' aircraft;
Step 2: obtain the current battlefield threat factor between aircraft between ourselves and the enemy by experimental formula.
We to the threat factor experimental formula of enemy's aircraft is at aircraft:
th ij = &omega; 1 th ij D ij th ij &epsiv; ij + &omega; 2 th ij V Bi - - - ( 1 )
Wherein subscript i represents our aircraft B i(i=1,2 ..., M), wherein M represents the total quantity of our aircraft, subscript j represents enemy's aircraft R j(j=1,2 ..., N), N represents the total quantity th of enemy's aircraft ijrepresent our aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jthreat factor, represent our aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jdistance threaten the factor, represent our aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jangle threaten the factor, represent our aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jspeed threaten the factor, ω 1with ω 2for non-negative weight coefficient, and meet ω 1+ ω 2=1;
We is aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jdistance threaten the factor be specially:
th ij D ij = 1.0 D ij &le; Ra B 1 - D ij - Ra B Tr B - Ra B Ra B < D ij &le; Tr B 0.0 D ij > Tr B - - - ( 2 )
Wherein D ijrepresent our aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jdistance, Ra brepresent our aircraft B ithe average effective operating distance of entrained weapon, Tr brepresent the maximum tracking range of our aircraft radars;
We is aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jangle threaten the factor be specially:
th ij &epsiv; ij = e - &lambda; 1 ( &pi;&epsiv; ij / 180 ) &lambda; 2 - - - ( 3 )
Wherein ε ijrepresent enemy's aircraft R jwith respect to we aircraft B ioff-axis angle, λ 1with λ 2for constant λ 1with λ 2generally, between 0 to 10, there is not the relation of mutual restriction in value.
We is aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jspeed threaten the factor be specially:
th ij V Bi = 1.0 V R j < 0.5 V B i 1.5 - V R j / V B i 0.5 V B i < V R j &le; 1.4 V B i 0.1 V R j > 1.4 V B i - - - ( 4 )
Wherein represent our aircraft B ispeed, represent enemy's aircraft R jspeed;
In like manner, enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B ithreat experimental formula be:
th ji = &omega; 3 th ji D ji th ji &epsiv; ji + &omega; 4 th ji V Rj - - - ( 5 )
Wherein subscript j represents enemy's aircraft R j, subscript i represents our aircraft B i, th jirepresent enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B ithreat factor, represent enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B idistance threaten the factor, represent enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B iangle threaten the factor, represent enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B ispeed threaten the factor, ω 3with ω 4for non-negative weight coefficient, and meet ω 3+ ω 4=1;
Enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B idistance threaten the factor be specially:
th ji D ji = 1.0 D ji &le; Ra R 1 - D ji - Ra R Tr R - Ra R Ra R < D ji &le; Tr R 0.0 D ji > Tr R - - - ( 6 )
Wherein D jirepresent enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B idistance, Ra rrepresent enemy's aircraft R jthe average effective operating distance of entrained weapon, Tr rrepresent the maximum tracking range of enemy's aircraft radars;
Enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B iangle threaten the factor be specially:
th ji &epsiv; ji = e - &lambda; 3 ( &pi;&epsiv; ji / 180 ) &lambda; 4 - - - ( 7 )
Wherein ε jirepresent our aircraft B iwith respect to enemy's aircraft R joff-axis angle, λ 3with λ 4for constant, λ 3with λ 4value generally between 0 to 10, there is not the relation of mutual restriction.
Enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B ispeed threaten the factor be specially:
th ji V Rj = 1.0 V B i < 0.5 V R j 1.5 - V B i / V R j 0.5 V R j < V B i &le; 1.4 V R j 0.1 V B i > 1.4 V R j - - - ( 8 )
Wherein represent enemy's aircraft R jspeed, represent our aircraft B ispeed;
Step 3: obtain all attack apportioning costs of each weapon of all our aircraft according to apportioning cost experimental formula, build the preferential apportioning cost vector of attacking.
We is aircraft B i(i=1,2 ..., M) and to enemy's aircraft R j(j=1,2 ..., N) apportioning cost experimental formula be:
AV ij = th ij &CenterDot; &Sigma; i = 1 M th ji - - - ( 9 )
Wherein th ijrepresent our aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jthreat factor, represent enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B ithreat, AV ijrepresent our aircraft B iattack enemy's aircraft R jattack apportioning cost;
According to apportioning cost experimental formula (9) calculate our all weapon r (r=1,2 ..., Z) and the aircraft B at this end of institute ithe entirety of all enemy's aircraft is attacked to apportioning cost vector AV zN × 1for
AV ZN×1=[AV 11,AV 12,…,AV 1N,AV 21,…,AV ZN],
Wherein Z is the total quantity of the entrained weapon of our all aircraft, AV 11represent that our carrying arms is numbered 1 aircraft attack enemy aircraft R 1attack apportioning cost, AV 12represent that our carrying arms is numbered 1 aircraft attack enemy aircraft R 2attack apportioning cost, AV 1Nrepresent that our carrying arms is numbered 1 aircraft attack enemy aircraft R nattack apportioning cost, AV 21represent that our carrying arms is numbered 2 aircraft attack enemy aircraft R 1attack apportioning cost, AV zNrepresent that our carrying arms is numbered the aircraft attack enemy aircraft R of Z nattack apportioning cost.Entirety is attacked apportioning cost vector AV zN × 1=[AV 11, AV 12..., AV 1N, AV 21..., AV zN] in comprised the attack apportioning cost of our each weapon to each aircraft of enemy, comprise altogether ZN attack apportioning cost.
Entirety is attacked to apportioning cost vector AV zN × 1a middle ZN AV 11, AV 12..., AV 1N, AV 21..., AV zNattack apportioning cost and arrange according to order from big to small, obtain priority allocation value vector PAV zN × 1, vectorial dimension is ZN × 1.
Step 4: set population scale, greatest iteration step number and variation probability P m, to our weapon allocative decision, carry out all quantum chromosomes in quantum bit coding initialization population.Wherein, population scale is designated as NUM, it is chromosomal number in population, greatest iteration step number is designated as MAX, be the maximum cycle of step 5 to step 9, our weapon allocative decision refers to the concrete distribution method of our all weapon attacking enemy aircraft, and our each weapon that comprises entirety in our a weapon allocative decision is once attacked all independent subscheme in distribution at certain.In the present invention, adopt item chromosome to represent a kind of our weapon allocative decision.
In i our weapon allocative decision (being in i chromosome of population), by we weapon r (r ∈ 1,2, Z) enemy's aircraft of attacking carries out quantum bit coding, the gene segment length of each weapon equals the number N of enemy's aircraft, and therefore in i chromosome, gene position corresponding to we each weapon r is encoded to g i r = [ &alpha; i r 1 &beta; i r 1 | &alpha; i r 2 &beta; i r 2 | . . . | &alpha; i rN &beta; i rN ] , i &Element; 1,2 , . . . NUM , Wherein α irepresent that in i chromosome, we weapon r does not attack enemy's aircraft R 1quantum bit probability amplitude, wherein represent that in i chromosome, we weapon r attacks enemy's aircraft R 1quantum bit probability amplitude, represent that in i chromosome, we weapon r does not attack enemy's aircraft R 2probability amplitude, wherein represent that in i chromosome, we weapon r attacks enemy's aircraft R 2quantum bit probability amplitude, represent that in i chromosome, we weapon r does not attack enemy's aircraft R nquantum bit probability amplitude, wherein represent that in i chromosome, we weapon r attacks enemy's aircraft R nquantum bit probability amplitude.The gene section that comprises our Z all weapons in the item chromosome of our a weapon allocative decision, therefore a chromosome total length is ZN, being encoded to an of whole chromosome of i our all weapons g i = [ g i 1 | g i 2 | . . . | g i r | . . . | g i Z ] , i &Element; 1,2 , . . . NUM , Comprise z gene section, wherein r gene section is encoded to the gene position coding that we weapon r is corresponding g i r = [ &alpha; i r 1 &beta; i r 1 | &alpha; i r 2 &beta; i r 2 | . . . | &alpha; i rN &beta; i rN ] , i &Element; 1,2 , . . . NUM , Therefore in whole chromosome, include ZN gene position.Right g i = [ g i 1 | g i 2 | . . . | g i r | . . . | g i Z ] , i &Element; 1,2 , . . . NUM In each gene position launch completely according to each gene position coding after, from 1 to ZN serial number, the chromosome after renumbeing is:
g i = [ &alpha; i 1 &beta; i 1 | &alpha; i 2 &beta; i 2 | . . . | &alpha; i ( r - 1 ) &CenterDot; N + j &beta; i ( r - 1 ) &CenterDot; N + j | . . . | &alpha; i Z &CenterDot; N &beta; i Z &CenterDot; N ] = [ &alpha; i 1 &beta; i 1 | &alpha; i 2 &beta; i 2 | . . . | &alpha; i k &beta; i k | . . . | &alpha; i Z &CenterDot; N &beta; i Z &CenterDot; N ] - - - ( 10 ) ;
Wherein i ∈ 1,2 ... NUM, r ∈ 1,2 ..., Z, j ∈ 1,2 ..., N, k=(r-1) N+j and k ∈ 1,2 ..., ZN; represent in i chromosome the 1st, the 2nd ... (r-1) N+j ... ZN gene position do not attacked the quantum bit probability amplitude of enemy's aircraft, represent in i chromosome the 1st, the 2nd ... (r-1) N+j ... ZN gene position attacked the quantum bit probability amplitude of enemy's aircraft;
Each gene position of whole chromosome to our all weapons in population is carried out initialization, makes all gene position &alpha; i 1 &beta; i 1 , &alpha; i 2 &beta; i 2 . . . &alpha; i ( r - 1 ) &CenterDot; N + j &beta; i ( r - 1 ) &CenterDot; N + j . . . &alpha; i N &CenterDot; Z &beta; i N &CenterDot; Z All be initialized as same numerical value thereby make in every chromosome our each weapon attacking enemy aircraft identical with the probability of not attacking enemy's aircraft.
Step 5: quantum chromosomes is filtered to (being called " observation " in quantum calculation), determine the value of each gene position in chromosome.
To chromosome g i = [ &alpha; i 1 &beta; i 1 | &alpha; i 2 &beta; i 2 | . . . | &alpha; i k &beta; i k | . . . | &alpha; i Z &CenterDot; N &beta; i Z &CenterDot; N ] , i &Element; 1,2 , . . . NUM Filter, with random chance, each gene position of chromosome is carried out to value, for example: to first gene position &alpha; i 1 &beta; i 1 Filter, produce immediately the random number between 0 to 1, if random number is less than value after k gene position filtered is 1, otherwise is taken as 0, the chromosome g after filtering i' be:
g i &prime; = [ G i 1 | G i 2 | . . . | G i N - Z ] , i &Element; 1,2 , . . . NUM - - - ( 11 )
Wherein or 0 (k ∈ 1,2 ..., NZ), for the chromosome g after filtering ithe ' the k position gene position value, k is NZ the k in gene position.
Step 6: according to preferential attack apportioning cost vector corrected quantum chromosomes.
According to the preferential attack apportioning cost vector PAV obtaining in step 3 zN × 1, successively by the chromosome g after filtering i', i ∈ 1,2 ... the attack apportioning cost AV that NUM calculates according to formula (9) ijlittle and gene location be 0, makes chromosome meet our weapon and only attack enemy's aircraft, and each enemy's aircraft distributes at most 2 weapons to attack;
If the whole chromosome g after filtering i' in number be less than the total number Z of our weapon, according to preferential attack apportioning cost vector PAV zN × 1successively by the whole chromosome g after filtering i' middle attack apportioning cost AV ijlarge and gene location be 1.
Step 7: obtain through the threaten degree of enemy's aircraft to our aircraft after our weapon attacking according to the threat experimental formula after conversion, and find out historical optimum solution.
For the quantum bit coding that filters after stain colour solid gene position in step 4 is corresponded to and threatened in experimental formula, threaten degree objective function is carried out to following conversion:
E = min &Sigma; j = 1 N &Sigma; i = 1 M { th ji &CenterDot; [ &Pi; r = 1 Z ( 1 - th rj ) X rj ] }
= min &Sigma; i = 1 M &Sigma; j = 1 N { th ji &CenterDot; [ &Pi; r = 1 Z ( 1 - th rj ) X rj ] }
= min &Sigma; i = 1 M &Sigma; j - 1 N { th ji &CenterDot; [ &Pi; r = 1 Z ( 1 - th rj ) G j + ( r - 1 ) &CenterDot; N ] } - - - ( 12 )
Wherein: E represents threaten degree objective function, N is the total number of enemy's aircraft, and M is the total number of our aircraft, and Z is the total number of our weapon, G j+ (r-1) Nrepresent N gene position of j+ (r-1) of we the chromosome g' after filtering, j ∈ 1,2 ..., N, r ∈ 1,2 ..., ZN; If gene position G k=1 (k ∈ 1 ... 2, Z, 1, and by the known k=of corresponding relation (r-1) N+j in formula (10), represent that we is numbered the weapon attacking enemy aircraft R of r jif 0 represents that the weapon that we is numbered r do not attack enemy's aircraft R j.
Calculate the chromosome g ' after i article of filtration in population ithe threaten degree target function value E obtaining through formula (12) i(wherein i ∈ 1,2 ..., NUM), as i article of chromosomal current solution, in the current solution (the threaten degree target function value calculating according to formula (12) for the first time) of first generation individuality, find out the current solution of all chromosome E iin minimum value be designated as E as the historical optimum solution (abbreviation optimum solution) of population b, the chromosome g ' after corresponding filtration ifor filtering chromosome, the optimum of population is designated as g b', corresponding unfiltered chromosome g ifor the optimum chromosome g of population b.
If not first generation individuality (not being to carry out iteration through step 5 to nine for the first time), this generation every chromosomal current solution compare with historical optimum solution, if i individual chromosomal current solution E ibe less than historical optimum solution E b, i.e. E i< E b, by this chromosomal current solution E ivalue give E b, i.e. E b=E i, filter chromosome g by i i' give optimum to filter chromosome g b', i.e. g b'=g i', by i chromosome g igive optimum chromosome g b, i.e. g b=g i.So will obtain historical optimum solution E through step 7 at every turn b, the optimum chromosome g that filters b' and optimum chromosome g b.
Step 8: all chromosomes in population are carried out to the rotation of quantum door.
&alpha; k , &beta; k , = cos &theta; k - sin &theta; k sin &theta; k cos &theta; k &alpha; k &beta; k - - - ( 13 )
With reference to experimental formula (13), wherein α k, β kfor filtering the chromosomal quantum bit probability amplitude that will be rotated in prochromosome gene position, α ' k, β ' kfor filtering postrotational quantum bit probability amplitude in after stain colour solid gene position, θ krepresent quantum rotation angle.Inquiry quantum rotation angle θ ktable, is rotated θ in Quantum rotating gate to every chromosome kquestion blank as shown in table 1 under:
Table 1: θ in Quantum rotating gate kquestion blank
F in above-mentioned table (x) is target function value, is the threaten degree functional value of enemy's aircraft to our aircraft after our weapon attacking obtaining according to the threat experimental formula (12) after conversion in step 7; S (α kβ k) be θ ksymbol; b kand x kbe respectively k in the optimum chromosome that obtains in step 7 and the current chromosome solution that will carry out the rotation of quantum door (k ∈ 1,2 ..., ZN) and the value of individual gene position.Quantum door rotation diagram as shown in Figure 2, through after quantum door rotation, the probability amplitude of k gene position of postrotational chromosome by &alpha; k &beta; k Become &alpha; k , &beta; k , .
Step 9: filter chromosome g ' according to optimum bwith variation probability P m, all chromosomes in population are carried out to mutation operation.
To the chromosome g in population ii ∈ 1,2 ..., NUM carries out mutation operation.First produce at random a random number P, if P>=P m, the chromogene bit comparison after filtering;
Gene position comparison procedure is: by the chromosome g after filtering i' filter chromosome g ' with optimum bcarry out corresponding gene for relatively, by g ' bmiddle gene position is 1 and g i' gene position that middle gene position is 0 is taken out, if g i' in k (k ∈ 1,2 ..., ZN) and individual gene position is removed, and the chromosome g of corresponding filtered ik gene position probability amplitude meet by g iin two probability amplitudes of k gene position with exchange the g after exchange iin k gene position by &alpha; i k &beta; i k Become &beta; i k &alpha; i k , G iby g i = [ &alpha; i 1 &beta; i 1 | &alpha; i 2 &beta; i 2 | . . . | &alpha; i k &beta; i k | . . . | &alpha; i Z &CenterDot; N &beta; i Z &CenterDot; N ] Become g i = [ &alpha; i 1 &beta; i 1 | &alpha; i 2 &beta; i 2 | . . . | &beta; i k &alpha; i k | . . . | &alpha; i Z &CenterDot; N &beta; i Z &CenterDot; N ] ; If probability amplitude does not exchange.
If P < is P m, chromosome g iskip mutation process.
Step 10: judge whether iterations reaches greatest iteration step number MAX, if do not reach, returns to step 5, continue circulation; If iterations reaches MAX, exit circulation.
Step 11: after step 10 exits circulation, the optimum obtaining filters chromosome g ' bfor the air battle multiple goal allocative decision obtaining.

Claims (1)

1. the heuristic quantum genetic method that air battle multiple goal is distributed, is characterized in that: comprise following step:
Step 1: obtain current situation of battlefield from command and control center:
Step 2: obtain the current battlefield threat factor between aircraft between ourselves and the enemy by experimental formula;
We to the threat factor experimental formula of enemy's aircraft is at aircraft:
th ij = &omega; 1 th ij D ij th ij &epsiv; ij + &omega; 2 th ij V Bi - - - ( 1 )
Wherein subscript i represents our aircraft B i(i=1,2 ..., M), wherein M represents the total quantity of our aircraft, subscript j represents enemy's aircraft R j(j=1,2 ..., N), N represents the total quantity of enemy's aircraft, th ijrepresent our aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jthreat factor, represent our aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jdistance threaten the factor, represent our aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jangle threaten the factor, represent our aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jspeed threaten the factor, wherein ω 1with ω 2for non-negative weight coefficient, and meet ω 1+ ω 2=1;
We is aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jdistance threaten the factor be specially:
th ij D ij = { 1 - 1.0 D ij &le; Ra B D ij - Ra B Tr B - Ra B Ra B < D ij &le; Tr B 0.0 D ij > Tr B - - - ( 2 )
Wherein: D ijrepresent our aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jdistance, Ra brepresent our aircraft B ithe average effective operating distance of entrained weapon, Tr brepresent the maximum tracking range of our aircraft radars;
We is aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jangle threaten the factor be specially:
th ij &epsiv; ij = e - &lambda; 1 ( &pi;&epsiv; ij / 180 ) &lambda; 2 - - - ( 3 )
Wherein ε ijrepresent enemy's aircraft R jwith respect to we aircraft B ioff-axis angle, λ 1with λ 2for constant λ 1with λ 2generally, between 0 to 10, there is not the relation of mutual restriction in value;
We is aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jspeed threaten the factor be specially:
th ij V Bi = 1.0 V R j < 0.5 V B i 1.5 - V R j / V B i 0.5 V B i < V R j &le; 1.4 V B i 0.1 V R j > 1.4 V B i - - - ( 4 )
Wherein represent our aircraft B ispeed, represent enemy's aircraft R jspeed;
In like manner enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B ithreat experimental formula be:
th ji = &omega; 3 th ji D ji th ji &epsiv; ji + &omega; 4 th ji V Rj - - - ( 5 )
Wherein subscript j represents enemy's aircraft R j, subscript i represents our aircraft B i, th jirepresent enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B ithreat factor, represent enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B idistance threaten the factor, represent enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B iangle threaten the factor, represent enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B ispeed threaten the factor, ω 3with ω 4for non-negative weight coefficient, and meet ω 3+ ω 4=1;
Enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B idistance threaten the factor be specially:
th ji D ji = { 1 - 1.0 D ji &le; Ra R D ji - Ra R Tr R - Ra R Ra R < D ji &le; Tr R 0.0 D ji > Tr R - - - ( 6 )
Wherein D jirepresent enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B idistance, Ra rrepresent enemy's aircraft R jthe average effective operating distance of entrained weapon, Tr rrepresent the maximum tracking range of enemy's aircraft radars;
Enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B iangle threaten the factor be specially:
th ji &epsiv; ji = e - &lambda; 3 ( &pi;&epsiv; ji / 180 ) &lambda; 4 - - - ( 7 )
Wherein ε jirepresent our aircraft B iwith respect to enemy's aircraft R joff-axis angle, λ 3with λ 4for constant;
Enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B ispeed threaten the factor be specially:
th ji V Rj = 1.0 V B i < 0.5 V R j 1.5 - V B i / V R j 0.5 V R j < V B i &le; 1.4 V R j 0.1 V B i > 1.4 V R j - - - ( 8 )
Wherein represent enemy's aircraft R jspeed, represent our aircraft B ispeed;
Step 3: obtain all attack apportioning costs of each weapon of all our aircraft according to apportioning cost experimental formula, build the preferential apportioning cost vector of attacking:
We is aircraft B i(i=1,2 ..., M) and to enemy's aircraft R j(j=1,2 ..., N) apportioning cost experimental formula be:
AV ij = th ij &CenterDot; &Sigma; i = 1 M th ji - - - ( 9 )
Wherein th ijrepresent our aircraft B ito enemy's aircraft R jthreat factor, represent enemy's aircraft R jto we aircraft B ithreat, AV ijrepresent our aircraft B iattack enemy's aircraft R jattack apportioning cost;
According to apportioning cost experimental formula (9) calculate our all weapon r (r=1,2 ..., Z) and the aircraft B at this end of institute ithe entirety of all enemy's aircraft is attacked to apportioning cost vector AV zN × 1for
AV ZN×1=[AV 11,AV 12,…,AV 1N,AV 21,…,AV ZN],
Wherein Z is the total quantity of the entrained weapon of our all aircraft, AV 11represent that our carrying arms is numbered 1 aircraft attack enemy aircraft R 1attack apportioning cost, AV 12represent that our carrying arms is numbered 1 aircraft attack enemy aircraft R 2attack apportioning cost, AV 1Nrepresent that our carrying arms is numbered 1 aircraft attack enemy aircraft R nattack apportioning cost, AV 21represent that our carrying arms is numbered 2 aircraft attack enemy aircraft R 1attack apportioning cost, AV zNrepresent that our carrying arms is numbered the aircraft attack enemy aircraft R of Z nattack apportioning cost, entirety is attacked apportioning cost vector AV zN × 1=[AV 11, AV 12..., AV 1N, AV 21..., AV zN] in comprised the attack apportioning cost of our each weapon to each aircraft of enemy, comprise altogether ZN attack apportioning cost;
Entirety is attacked to apportioning cost vector AV zN × 1a middle ZN AV 11, AV 12,, AV 1N, AV 21,, AV zNattack apportioning cost and arrange according to order from big to small, obtain priority allocation value vector PAV zN × 1, vectorial dimension is ZN × 1;
Step 4: set population scale, greatest iteration step number and variation probability P mto our weapon allocative decision, carry out all quantum chromosomes in quantum bit coding initialization population, wherein population scale is designated as NUM, for chromosomal number in population, greatest iteration step number is designated as MAX, in i our weapon allocative decision, by we weapon r (r ∈ 1,2 ..., Z) and enemy's aircraft of attacking carries out quantum bit coding, the gene segment length of each weapon equals the number N of enemy's aircraft, and therefore in i chromosome, gene position corresponding to we each weapon r is encoded to g i r = [ &alpha; i r 1 &beta; r r 1 &alpha; i r 2 &beta; i r 2 . . . &alpha; i rN &beta; i rN ] , I ∈ 1,2 ... NUM, wherein represent that in i chromosome, we weapon r does not attack enemy's aircraft R 1quantum bit probability amplitude, wherein represent that in i chromosome, we weapon r attacks enemy's aircraft R 1quantum bit probability amplitude, represent that in i chromosome, we weapon r does not attack enemy's aircraft R 2probability amplitude, wherein represent that in i chromosome, we weapon r attacks enemy's aircraft R 2quantum bit probability amplitude, represent that in i chromosome, we weapon r does not attack enemy's aircraft R nquantum bit probability amplitude, wherein represent that in i chromosome, we weapon r attacks enemy's aircraft R nquantum bit probability amplitude, in the item chromosome of our a weapon allocative decision, comprise the gene section of our Z all weapons, therefore a chromosome total length is ZN, a whole chromosome of i our all weapons be encoded to gi=[gi 1| gi 2| ... | g ir| ... | gi z], i ∈ 1,2 ... NUM, comprises z gene section, and wherein r gene section is encoded to the gene position coding that we weapon r is corresponding g i r = [ &alpha; i r 1 &beta; r r 1 &alpha; i r 2 &beta; i r 2 . . . &alpha; i rN &beta; i rN ] , I ∈ 1,2 ... NUM, therefore includes ZN gene position in whole chromosome, right i ∈ 1,2 ... after each gene position in NUM is launched completely according to each gene position coding, from 1 to ZN serial number, the chromosome after renumbeing is:
g i = [ &alpha; i 1 &beta; i 1 &alpha; i 2 &beta; i 2 . . . &alpha; i ( r - 1 ) &CenterDot; N + j &beta; i ( r - 1 ) &CenterDot; N + j . . . &alpha; i Z &CenterDot; N &beta; i Z &CenterDot; N ] = [ &alpha; i 1 &beta; i 1 &alpha; i 2 &beta; i 2 . . . &alpha; i k &beta; i k . . . &alpha; i Z &CenterDot; N &beta; i Z &CenterDot; N ] - - - ( 10 )
Wherein i ∈ 1,2 ... NUM, r ∈ 1,2 ..., Z, j ∈ 1,2 ..., N, k=(r-1) N+j and k ∈ 1,2 ..., ZN; represent in i chromosome the 1st, the 2nd ... (r-1) N+j ... ZN gene position do not attacked the quantum bit probability amplitude of enemy's aircraft, represent in i chromosome the 1st, the 2nd ... (r-1) N+j ... ZN gene position attacked the quantum bit probability amplitude of enemy's aircraft;
Each gene position of whole chromosome to our all weapons in population is carried out initialization, makes all gene position &alpha; i 1 &beta; i 1 , &alpha; i 2 &beta; i 2 . . . &alpha; i ( r - 1 ) &CenterDot; N + j &beta; i ( r - 1 ) &CenterDot; N + j . . . &alpha; i Z &CenterDot; N &beta; i Z &CenterDot; N All be initialized as same numerical value thereby make in every chromosome our each weapon attacking enemy aircraft identical with the probability of not attacking enemy's aircraft;
Step 5: quantum chromosomes is filtered, determine the value of each gene position in chromosome;
To chromosome g i = &alpha; i 1 &beta; i 1 &alpha; i 2 &beta; i 2 . . . &alpha; i k &beta; i k ... &alpha; i Z &CenterDot; N &beta; i Z &CenterDot; N , I ∈ 1,2 ... NUM filters, and with random chance, each gene position of chromosome is carried out to value, produces immediately the random number between 0 to 1, if random number is less than value after k gene position filtered is 1, otherwise is taken as 0, the chromosome g ' after filtering ifor:
g i ' = [ G i 1 | G i 2 | . . . | G i N &CenterDot; Z | i &Element; 1,2 , . . . NUM - - - ( 11 )
Wherein or 0 (k ∈ 1,2 ..., NZ), for the chromosome g ' after filtering ik position gene position value, k is NZ the k in gene position;
Step 6: according to preferential attack apportioning cost vector corrected quantum chromosomes;
According to the preferential attack apportioning cost vector PAV obtaining in step 3 zN × 1, successively by the chromosome g ' after filtering i, i ∈ 1,2 ... the attack apportioning cost AV that NUM calculates according to formula (9) ijlittle and gene location be 0, makes chromosome meet our weapon and only attack enemy's aircraft, and each enemy's aircraft distributes at most 2 weapons to attack;
If the whole chromosome g ' after filtering iin number be less than the total number Z of our weapon, according to preferential attack apportioning cost vector PAV zN × 1successively by the whole chromosome g ' after filtering imiddle attack apportioning cost AV ijlarge and gene location be 1;
Step 7: obtain through the threaten degree of enemy's aircraft to our aircraft after our weapon attacking according to the threat experimental formula after conversion, and find out historical optimum solution;
For the quantum bit coding that filters after stain colour solid gene position in step 4 is corresponded to and threatened in experimental formula, threaten degree objective function is carried out to following conversion:
E = min &Sigma; j = 1 N &Sigma; i = 1 M { th ji &CenterDot; [ &Pi; r = 1 Z ( 1 - th rj ) X rj ] }
= min &Sigma; i = 1 M &Sigma; j = 1 N { th ji &CenterDot; [ &Pi; r = 1 Z ( 1 - th rj ) X rj ] } = min &Sigma; i = 1 M &Sigma; j = 1 N { th ji &CenterDot; [ &Pi; r = 1 Z ( 1 - th rj ) G j + ( r - 1 ) &CenterDot; N ] } - - - ( 12 )
Wherein: E represents threaten degree objective function, N is the total number of enemy's aircraft, and M is the total number of our aircraft, and Z is the total number of our weapon, G j+ (r-1) Nrepresent N gene position of j+ (r-1) of we the chromosome g' after filtering, j ∈ 1,2 ..., N, r ∈ 1,2 ..., ZN; If gene position
G k=1 (k ∈ 1,2 ..., ZN), and by the known k=of corresponding relation (r-1) N+j in formula (10), represent that we is numbered the weapon attacking enemy aircraft R of r jif 0 represents that the weapon that we is numbered r do not attack enemy's aircraft R j;
Calculate the chromosome g' after i article of filtration in population ithe threaten degree target function value E obtaining through formula (12) i, wherein i ∈ 1,2 ..., NUM, as i article of chromosomal current solution, in the current solution of first generation individuality, finds out the current solution of all chromosome E iin minimum value as the historical optimum solution of population, be designated as E b, the chromosome g' after corresponding filtration ifor filtering chromosome, the optimum of population is designated as g ' b, corresponding unfiltered chromosome g ifor the optimum chromosome g of population b;
If not first generation individuality, this generation every chromosomal current solution and historical optimum solution compare, if i chromosomal current solution E ibe less than historical optimum solution E b, i.e. E i< E b, by this chromosomal current solution E ivalue give E b, i.e. E b=E i, filter chromosome g ' by i igive the optimum chromosome g ' that filters i, i.e. g ' b=g ' i, by i chromosome g igive optimum chromosome g b, g b=g i;
Step 8: all chromosomes in population are carried out to the rotation of quantum door;
&alpha; k ' &beta; k ' = cos &theta; k - sin &theta; k sin &theta; k cos &theta; k &alpha; k &beta; k - - - ( 13 )
With reference to experimental formula (13), wherein α k, β kfor filtering the chromosomal quantum bit probability amplitude that will be rotated in prochromosome gene position, α ' k, β ' kfor filtering postrotational quantum bit probability amplitude in after stain colour solid gene position, θ krepresent quantum rotation angle, inquiry quantum rotation angle θ ktable, is rotated every chromosome, through after quantum door rotation, the probability amplitude of k gene position of postrotational chromosome by &alpha; k &beta; k Become &alpha; k ' &beta; k ' ;
Step 9: filter chromosome g' according to optimum bwith variation probability P m, all chromosomes in population are carried out to mutation operation;
To the chromosome g in population i(i ∈ 1,2 ..., NUM) and carry out mutation operation, produce first at random a random number P, if P>=P m, the chromogene bit comparison after filtering;
Gene position comparison procedure is: by the chromosome g ' after filtering ifilter chromosome g ' with optimum bcarry out corresponding gene for relatively, by g ' bmiddle gene position is 1 and g ' imiddle gene position is that 0 gene position is taken out, if g ' iin k (k ∈ 1,2 ..., ZN) and individual gene position is removed, and the chromosome g of corresponding filtered ik gene position probability amplitude meet by g iin two probability amplitudes of k gene position with exchange the g after exchange iin k gene position by &alpha; i k &beta; i k Become &beta; i k &alpha; i k , G iby g i = &alpha; i 1 &beta; i 1 &alpha; i 2 &beta; i 2 . . . &alpha; i k &beta; i k ... &alpha; i Z &CenterDot; N &beta; i Z &CenterDot; N Become g i = &alpha; i 1 &beta; i 1 &alpha; i 2 &beta; i 2 . . . &beta; i k &alpha; i k ... &alpha; i Z &CenterDot; N &beta; i Z &CenterDot; N ; If probability amplitude does not exchange;
If P < is P m, chromosome g iskip mutation process;
Step 10: judge whether iterations reaches greatest iteration step number MAX, if do not reach, returns to step 5, continue circulation; If iterations reaches MAX, exit circulation;
Step 11: after step 10 exits circulation, the optimum obtaining filters chromosome g' bfor the air battle multiple goal allocative decision obtaining.
CN201210147056.0A 2012-05-11 2012-05-11 Heuristic quantum genetic method of multi-target distribution in air war Expired - Fee Related CN102722751B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201210147056.0A CN102722751B (en) 2012-05-11 2012-05-11 Heuristic quantum genetic method of multi-target distribution in air war

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201210147056.0A CN102722751B (en) 2012-05-11 2012-05-11 Heuristic quantum genetic method of multi-target distribution in air war

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN102722751A CN102722751A (en) 2012-10-10
CN102722751B true CN102722751B (en) 2014-07-30

Family

ID=46948500

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201210147056.0A Expired - Fee Related CN102722751B (en) 2012-05-11 2012-05-11 Heuristic quantum genetic method of multi-target distribution in air war

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN102722751B (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103246818A (en) * 2013-05-15 2013-08-14 西北工业大学 TOPSIS-method multi-target threat ordering method based on information entropy
CN109376544B (en) * 2018-09-18 2022-04-29 浙江工业大学 Method for preventing community structure in complex network from being deeply excavated
CN112284188A (en) * 2020-09-25 2021-01-29 南京航空航天大学 Unmanned aerial vehicle attack and defense decision method based on self-adaptive step discrete wolf cluster algorithm

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101908097A (en) * 2010-07-13 2010-12-08 北京航空航天大学 Particle swarm optimization method for air combat decision

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7398257B2 (en) * 2003-12-24 2008-07-08 Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha Multiobjective optimization apparatus, multiobjective optimization method and multiobjective optimization program

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101908097A (en) * 2010-07-13 2010-12-08 北京航空航天大学 Particle swarm optimization method for air combat decision

Non-Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Majorization Of Artillery Fire Distribution Base On Quantum Genetic Algorithm;Wang zhiteng et al;《2011 Second International Conference on Intelligent System Design and Engineering Application》;20120107;337-340 *
Wang zhiteng et al.Majorization Of Artillery Fire Distribution Base On Quantum Genetic Algorithm.《2011 Second International Conference on Intelligent System Design and Engineering Application》.2012,337-340.
基于量子遗传算法的反舰导弹火力分配方法;武志东等;《计算机测量与控制》;20111231;第19卷(第12期);3005-3008 *
张鹏飞等.量子遗传算法在目标分配上的应用.《佳木斯大学学报( 自然科学版)》.2008,第26卷(第4期),497-499.
武志东等.基于量子遗传算法的反舰导弹火力分配方法.《计算机测量与控制》.2011,第19卷(第12期),3005-3008.
量子遗传算法在目标分配上的应用;张鹏飞等;《佳木斯大学学报( 自然科学版)》;20080731;第26卷(第4期);497-499 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN102722751A (en) 2012-10-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN106406346B (en) A kind of multiple no-manned plane collaboration rapid Cover search path planning method
CN112733421B (en) Task planning method for cooperation of unmanned aerial vehicle with ground fight
CN108549402B (en) Unmanned aerial vehicle group task allocation method based on quantum crow group search mechanism
CN101908097B (en) Particle swarm optimization method for air combat decision
CN111240353B (en) Unmanned aerial vehicle collaborative air combat decision method based on genetic fuzzy tree
CN106908066B (en) Unmanned aerial vehicle monitoring covering single-step optimization flight path planning method based on genetic algorithm
CN101286071B (en) Multiple no-manned plane three-dimensional formation reconfiguration method based on particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm
CN107832885B (en) Ship formation fire power distribution method based on self-adaptive migration strategy BBO algorithm
CN102722751B (en) Heuristic quantum genetic method of multi-target distribution in air war
CN103425840A (en) Cooperative air combat firepower distribution method based on improved multi-target leapfrog algorithm
CN103744290A (en) Hierarchical target allocation method for multiple unmanned aerial vehicle formations
CN103471592A (en) Multi-unmanned aerial vehicle route planning method based on bee colony collaborative foraging algorithm
CN105512769A (en) Unmanned aerial vehicle route planning system and unmanned aerial vehicle route planning method based on genetic programming
CN113031650B (en) Unmanned aerial vehicle cluster cooperative target distribution design method under uncertain environment
CN104950673A (en) Method for distributing targets cooperatively attacked by unmanned aerial vehicle group
CN101893441A (en) Unmanned aerial vehicle flight path optimization method based on deviation maximization and grey correlation analysis
CN110442146B (en) Unmanned aerial vehicle formation target allocation and space occupation combined decision-making method and system
Qiuni et al. Approach for air-to-air confrontment based on uncertain interval information conditions
CN112926825B (en) Multi-unmanned aerial vehicle task allocation method based on multi-target quantum krill group mechanism
Wei et al. UCAVs online collaborative path planning method based on dynamic task allocation
Tian et al. Research on Target Assignment of Multiple-UAVs Based on Improved Hybrid Genetic Algorithm
CN114020022B (en) Heterogeneous unmanned aerial vehicle collaborative hit task planning method and device
Xu et al. Solution of fire coordination scheme of equipment system based on fuzzy clustering-auction mechanism
Gu et al. Genetic vector ordinal optimization algorithm based on RSM for UCAV attack planning
Xiaoguang et al. Optimal attack threshold control for UAVs air combat on the condition of decoys jamming

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
C14 Grant of patent or utility model
GR01 Patent grant
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee

Granted publication date: 20140730

Termination date: 20150511

EXPY Termination of patent right or utility model