CN102625365B - Method for mobility robustness optimization (MRO) and mobility load balancing (MLB) and base station - Google Patents
Method for mobility robustness optimization (MRO) and mobility load balancing (MLB) and base station Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN102625365B CN102625365B CN201210074014.9A CN201210074014A CN102625365B CN 102625365 B CN102625365 B CN 102625365B CN 201210074014 A CN201210074014 A CN 201210074014A CN 102625365 B CN102625365 B CN 102625365B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- msub
- mrow
- ttt
- hys
- mro
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 31
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 16
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 20
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000010295 mobile communication Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
Abstract
The embodiment of the invention provides a method for mobility robustness optimization (MRO) and mobility load balancing (MLB) and a base station, which relate to the field of mobile communication and can be used for performing joint optimization on MRO and MLB functions synchronously to increase the overall performance of a system. The method comprises the steps of: setting frequencies fd, fMLB, fSPSA (Simultaneous Perturbation Stochastic Approximation), fMRO and fSAT (Saturation Threshold) according to a frequency setting rule; sending updated Rho c, HOF (Handover Failure), HPP (Handover Ping-Pong) and CDR (Call Drop Rate) to a corresponding controller at the frequency fd; updating Ocs (Cell-Specific Offset) according to updated Rho c by an MLB controller at the frequency fMLB; updating Hys* (Hysteresis) and TTT* (Time to Trigger) by an SPSA controller at the frequency fSPSA according to the updated HOF, HPP and CDR; updating Hys and TTTmro by an MRO controller at the frequency fMRO according to the updated HOF, HPP and CDR as well as the updated Hys* and TTT*; and updating TTT by an SAT controller at the frequency fSAT according to the updated Rhoc and the updated TTTmro.
Description
Technical Field
The present invention relates to the field of mobile communications, and in particular, to a method and a base station for mobility robustness optimization and mobility load balancing.
Background
In the LTE (Long Term Evolution) Project of 3GPP (3rd Generation Partnership Project), the number of network parameters is huge and the complexity is high, and if manual operation is adopted for configuring and managing the network parameters like the conventional network, the problems of high labor cost, high error rate and the like may occur. In order to reduce manual intervention in configuring and managing a base station (eNB) as much as possible, 3GPP proposes a Self-Organizing network (SON), which introduces an automation mechanism to reduce manual intervention, thereby reducing cost.
MRO (Mobility Robustness Optimization) and MLB (Mobility Load Balancing) are two important functions in ad hoc networks. The MLB changes the switching conditions by adjusting the switching parameter Ocs (the specific offset of the cell to the serving cell) to switch part of the users in the overloaded cell to the low-load neighboring cell in advance or delay the switching of the users in the neighboring cell to the overloaded cell, thereby balancing the load among the cells; the MRO changes the handover condition by adjusting the handover parameters TTT (Time to Trigger, Trigger Time) and hysteris (Hysteresis), thereby optimizing the network and avoiding or reducing radio link failure and unnecessary handover related to handover.
In the prior art, a base station independently optimizes the function of MRO or MLB, when the system triggers MLB to adjust Ocs for load balancing, a large number of radio link failures and unnecessary handovers occur, and when triggering MRO to reversely adjust TTT and Hys, the problem of system load imbalance occurs. That is, when the MRO and MLB independently adjust the parameters to optimize their own performance targets, optimization conflicts are caused, and the overall performance of the system is reduced.
Disclosure of Invention
The embodiment of the invention provides a method and a base station for mobile robustness optimization and mobile load balancing, which can synchronously carry out joint optimization on MRO and MLB functions and improve the comprehensive performance of a system.
In order to achieve the above purpose, the embodiment of the invention adopts the following technical scheme:
a method for mobile robustness optimization and mobile load balancing, comprising:
setting parameter update frequency f according to frequency setting principledMLB controller driving frequency f for mobile load balancingMLBOptimizing MRO controller drive frequency f by moving robustnessMROSAT driving frequency f of saturation threshold controllerSATAnd synchronous disturbance random approximation algorithm SPSA controller driveFrequency fSPSA;
At a frequency fdInputting updated cell load ρ to the MLB controller and SATcInputting updated handover failure rate HOF, handover ping-pong effect HPP and call drop rate CDR to the MRO controller and the SPSA controller;
MLB controller at frequency fMLBAccording to the updated rhocUpdating the specific offset Ocs of the user to the serving cell;
SPSA controller with frequency fSPSAUpdating hysteresis value perturbation value Hys according to the updated HOF, HPP and CDR*And time-to-trigger disturbance value TTT*And inputting the updated Hys to the MRO controller*And TTT*;
MRO controller at frequency fMROAccording to the updated HOF, HPP and CDR and the updated Hys*And TTT*Updating hysteresis value Hys and optimizing time to trigger TTTmroAnd inputting an updated TTT to the SATmro;
SAT at frequency fSATAccording to the updated rhocAnd the updated TTTmroThe time to trigger TTT is updated.
A base station, comprising:
a setting unit for setting the parameter update frequency f according to the frequency setting principledMLB controller driving frequency f for mobile load balancingMLBOptimizing MRO controller drive frequency f by moving robustnessMROSAT driving frequency f of saturation threshold controllerSATAnd synchronous disturbance random approximation algorithm SPSA controller driving frequency fSPSA;
A transmitting unit for transmitting at a frequency fdInputting updated cell load ρ to the MLB controller and SATcInputting updated HOF, switching ping-pong effect HPP and call drop rate CDR to the MRO controller and the SPSA controller;
MLB controller for controlling at frequency fMLBAccording to the updated rhocUpdating the specific offset Ocs of the user to the serving cell;
SPSA controller for controlling at a frequency fSPSAUpdating hysteresis value perturbation value Hys according to the updated HOF, HPP and CDR*And time-to-trigger disturbance value TTT*And inputting the updated Hys to the MRO controller*And TTT*;
MRO controller for controlling the frequency fMROAccording to the updated HOF, HPP and CDR and the updated Hys*And TTT*Updating hysteresis value Hys and optimizing time to trigger TTTmroAnd inputting an updated TTT to the SATmro;
SAT for use at frequency fSATAccording to the updated rhocAnd the updated TTTmroThe time to trigger TTT is updated.
The method and the base station for mobile robustness optimization and mobile load balancing provided by the technical scheme can be combined with the performance index rho of the MLBcAnd MRO performance indexes HOF, HPP and CDR continuously update TTT, and MRO and MLB functions are synchronously optimized in a combined manner, so that the comprehensive performance of the system is improved.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly described below, it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and for those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained according to the drawings without creative efforts.
Fig. 1 is a schematic flowchart of a method for mobility robustness optimization and mobility load balancing according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 2 is a block diagram of a base station according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
An embodiment of the present invention provides a method for mobility robustness optimization and mobility load balancing, as shown in fig. 1, the method includes the following steps:
101. setting parameter update frequency f according to frequency setting principledMLB controller drive frequency fMLBMRO controller drive frequency fMROSAT (Saturation threshold controller) driving frequency fSATAnd SPSA (Simultaneous particle swarm storage Stochastic Approximation) controller driving frequency fSPSA。
In this embodiment, the frequency setting principle includes: f isMLBIs less than or equal to fdSaid fSATIs equal to fdSaid fMROIs greater than fSPSASaid fSPSAF or moreHPI。
Wherein, the fHPIThe time for the performance of each controller to reach the stable state after the parameters Ocs, Hys and TTT are adjusted is the reciprocal of the time. For example, after adjusting the parameters Ocs, Hys and TTT, the performance of the MLB controller and the MRO controller fluctuates, if the time for the performance of the MLB controller to reach the steady state is 1s and the time for the MRO controller to reach the steady state is 5s, the time for the performance of the controllers to reach the steady state is 5s,therefore fHPI=1/5=0.2Hz。
Optionally, in this embodiment, f isHPIAt 0.2Hz, the base station may set the driving frequencies of the MLB controller, MRO controller, SAT, and SPSA controllers to: f. ofd=20Hz,fMLB=2Hz,fMRO=2Hz,fSAT=20Hz,fSPSA=0.2Hz。
102. At a frequency fdInputting updated cell load ρ to the MLB controller and SATcAnd inputting updated HOF (Handover failure rate), HPP (Handover Ping-Pong Ratio) and CDR (Call Drop Ratio) to the MRO controller and the SPSA controller.
In this embodiment, the base station will cycle by cycleTo statistically update the parameters, HOF, HPP and CDR. In the prior art, a base station calculates a performance index parameter ρ of an MLB controller according to parameters Ocs, Hys and TTT in each controllercAnd the performance indicator parameters HOF, HPP and CDR of the MRO controller, the specific calculation methods thereof being well known to those skilled in the art and not described in detail herein. The base station calculates rho obtained by calculation every 0.05scInputting the data into the MLB controller and the SAT, and updating the rho values in the MLB controller and the SATcAnd inputting the counted parameters HOF, HPP and CDR into the MRO controller and the SPSA controller, and updating the three parameter values HOF, HPP and CDR in the MRO controller and the SPSA controller.
103. MLB controller at frequency fMLBAccording to the updated rhocAnd updating the Ocs.
In this embodiment, the base station inputs updated ρ to the MLB controller every 0.05scValue, MLB controller every otherAccording to updates in MLBρcAnd calculating the parameter Ocs, and updating the parameter Ocs in the MLB controller.
Optionally, in an initial state, that is, when the MLB controller is driven for the first time, the parameter Ocs in the MLB controller is a preset initial value Ocs1。
When the MLB controller is driven for the ith (i is more than or equal to 1) time in a non-initial state, the Ocs is the OcsiSaid OcsiEvery 0.5s can be calculated according to the following formula:
Each base station serves a serving cell, r is a preset serving cell load target value, and if r is 0.5, the adjustment target of the MLB controller is represented to make the load of the serving cell half of the bearable load; r is 1, it means that the adjustment target of the controller is such that the load of the serving cell is full. If the load rho of the service cell counted by the current base stationcIf the load of the service cell is larger than r, the load of the service cell is adjusted to be smaller, and if the load of the service cell is counted by the current base station, rho is adjusted to be smallercLess than r will adjust the serving cell load in the larger direction. In this embodiment, the base station statistically updates the current load ρ every 0.05scThe MLB controller can track the current load rho in timecDifference from the target load r, the current load ρ is made by changing the value of OcscAnd continuously adjusting the load in the target direction to reach the preset target value r of the serving cell as much as possible. In addition, the specific value of r depends on the current network condition, and is the final target value of the load balancing of the serving cell.
Optionally, in this embodiment, the p is a function of the pcAnd Ocs of i-1 th updatei-1Calculating to obtain a0And b0There are two methods, one is a BGF (Bounded-Gain-forming) algorithm, and one is a slope estimation algorithm.
Wherein, the BGF algorithm is as follows:
the first time the MLB controller is driven, the a0And b0Is a preset constant value a1And b1. At the moment, the Ocs is a preset initial value Ocs1。
The a is in a non-initial state, i.e., the ith time the MLB controller is driven0And b0This can be calculated by the following method:
calculating a filtered signal matrix WiW is as describediThe following formula is satisfied: <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>W</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>α</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msub>
<mi>W</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>+</mo>
<msub>
<mi>α</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mi>Δt</mi>
<msup>
<mfenced open='[' close=']'>
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<msub>
<mi>ρ</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
</msub>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<msub>
<mi>Ocs</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
</mfenced>
<mi>T</mi>
</msup>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> wherein, W1=[ρc Ocs1],α0Is the low pass filter bandwidth constant, Δ t is the time step for invoking the BGF algorithm;
according to the WiCalculating a gain matrix PiSaid P isiThe following formula is satisfied:wherein, P1Is a preset initial value P0;Is PiThe derivative with respect to time t satisfies the following equation:λias a forgetting factor, the following formula is satisfied:||Pi||2the following formula is satisfied for the Euclidean norm of the gain matrix: <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mrow>
<mo>|</mo>
<mo>|</mo>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>|</mo>
<mo>|</mo>
</mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<msqrt>
<msub>
<mi>λ</mi>
<mi>max</mi>
</msub>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<msubsup>
<mi>P</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
<mi>T</mi>
</msubsup>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</msqrt>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> is thatThe characteristic value of (2).
According to the WiAnd PiCalculating an estimated parameter vectorThe above-mentionedThe following formula is satisfied: <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>+</mo>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mover>
<mo>^</mo>
<mo>·</mo>
</mover>
</mover>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mi>Δt</mi>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> wherein, <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mfenced open='[' close=']'>
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<msub>
<mi>α</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>a</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<msub>
<mi>b</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
</mfenced>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mover>
<mo>^</mo>
<mo>·</mo>
</mover>
</mover>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<msubsup>
<mi>W</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
<mi>T</mi>
</msubsup>
<msub>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<msub>
<mi>W</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>ρ</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
</msub>
<mo>.</mo>
</mrow>
</math>
according to the aboveCalculating the a0And b0When the i-th driving MLB controller calculates the Ocs, the a0Is equal to aiSaid b is0Is equal to bi(ii) a Wherein, the aiThe following formula is satisfied:b isiThe following formula is satisfied:
the slope estimation algorithm is as follows:
the first time the MLB controller is driven, the a0And b0Is a preset constant value a1And b1. At the moment, the Ocs is a preset initial value Ocs1。
The a is in a non-initial state, i.e., the ith time the MLB controller is driven0And b0This can be calculated by the following method:
calculating a filtered signal matrix WiW is as describediThe following formula is satisfied: <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>W</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>α</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msub>
<mi>W</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>+</mo>
<msub>
<mi>α</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mi>Δt</mi>
<msup>
<mfenced open='[' close=']'>
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<msub>
<mi>ρ</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
</msub>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<msub>
<mi>Ocs</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
</mfenced>
<mi>T</mi>
</msup>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> wherein, W1=[ρc Ocs1],α0Is the low pass filter bandwidth constant and Δ t is the time step to invoke the slope estimation algorithm.
According to the WiCalculating an estimated parameter vectorThe above-mentionedThe following formula is satisfied: <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>+</mo>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mover>
<mo>^</mo>
<mo>·</mo>
</mover>
</mover>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mi>Δt</mi>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> wherein, <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mfenced open='[' close=']'>
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<msub>
<mi>α</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>a</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<msub>
<mi>b</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
</mfenced>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mover>
<mo>^</mo>
<mo>·</mo>
</mover>
</mover>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<msubsup>
<mi>W</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
<mi>T</mi>
</msubsup>
<msub>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<msub>
<mi>W</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>ρ</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
</msub>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> and P is a preset gain matrix.
According to the aboveCalculating the a0And b0When the i-th driving MLB controller calculates the Ocs, the a0Is equal to aiSaid b is0Is equal to bi(ii) a Wherein, the aiThe following formula is satisfied:b isiThe following formula is satisfied:
104. SPSA controller with frequency fSPSAAccording toThe updated HOF, HPP and CDR and the updated TTT and Hys update hysteresis value perturbation values Hys*And time-to-trigger disturbance value TTT*And inputting the updated Hys to the MRO controller*And TTT*。
SPSA controller with periodThe Hys when the SPSA controller is driven for the jth time*Is equal to Hys* jThe TTT*Is equal to TTT* j;
Calculating Hys when the SPSA controller is driven for the 3n +1 th time*And TTT*Said Hys*And TTT*The following formula is satisfied:
Calculating loss parameters L + and TTT when the SPSA controller is driven for the 3n +2 times*And Hys*The L + and TTT*And Hys*The following formula is satisfied:
calculating the inverse loss parameter L-, Hys when the SPSA controller is driven for the 3n +3 times*And TTT*The L-TTT*And Hys*The following formula is satisfied:
it should be noted here that the HOF, HPP and CDR are updated every 0.05s, and the TTT and Hys are updated every 0.5 s.
105. MRO controller at frequency fMROAccording to the updated HOF, HPP and CDR and the updated Hys*And TTT*Updating hysteresis value Hys and optimizing time to trigger TTTmroAnd inputting an updated TTT to the SATmro。
Optionally, the MRO controller cyclesAccording to the Hys*And TTT*Calculating a gamma value, the gamma value satisfying the following formula:
if gamma is less than or equal to the preset lower limit value, Hys and TTTmroThe following formula is satisfied:
TTTmro=TTT*-ymro,Hys=Hys*;
if gamma is greater than or equal to a preset lower limit value and less than or equal to a preset upper limit value, Hys and TTTmroThe following formula is satisfied:
TTTmro=TTT*-ymro,Hys=Hys*-ymro。
if gamma is greater than or equal to a preset upper limit value, Hys and TTTmroThe following formula is satisfied:
TTTmro=TTT*,Hys=Hys*-ymro。
wherein, said ymroAt a frequency fMROCalculated according to the updated HOF, HPP and CDR, ymroSatisfy the requirement of w1、w2、w3Is a preset parameter weight value.
It should be noted that the preset lower limit and the preset upper limit may be set according to the specific situation of the actual scene, and are not fixed, and they function to make the ratio of Hys and TTT always stable within a proper range. In this embodiment, the preset lower limit value may be set to 20 °, and the preset upper limit value may be set to 80 °.
For a preset parameter weight value w1、w2、w3In general, operators place more importance on HOF and CDR, i.e., w1And w3General ratio w2Large, so that said ymroIn most cases positive values. Thus, the MRO controller is paired with the TTT*And Hys*The adjustment of (c) is generally to remain unchanged or to a small direction, i.e. to a direction more favorable for the HOF and CDR.
106. SAT at frequency fSATAccording to the updated rhocAnd the updated TTTmroThe time to trigger TTT is updated.
In a period ofAccording to rhocCalculating a value of l, the value of l satisfying the following formula:
l=1+(1-ρc)·15
if TTTmroIf the value is less than the value of l, the TTT is equal to the TTTmro;
If TTTmroAnd if the value is larger than the value of l, the TTT is equal to l.
I.e. the SAT is updated every 0.05s for TTT according to the MRO controller performance index parameters HOF, HPP and CDR and the MLB controller performance index parameter p, as can be seen from steps 104, 105, 106cAre jointly decided.
When the initial state of the base station, that is, when t is 0, the MLB controller, the SPSA controller, the MRO controller, and the SAT are sequentially driven, and the base station outputs the performance index parameter ρ to each controllercHOF, HPP and CDR, updated every 0.05 s.
Starting from t being 0s, driving the SAT once every 0.05s, and performing step 106 to update an adjustment parameter TTT influencing the MRO; driving the MLB controller, the MRO controller and the SAT once every 0.5s in sequence, performing steps 103, 105 and 106, and updating the adjusting parameters Ocs, Hys and TTT influencing the MRO and the MLB; the MLB controller, the SPSA controller, the MRO controller, and the SAT are sequentially driven every 5s, and steps 103, 104, 105, and 106 are performed.
An embodiment of the present invention further provides a base station, where the base station is configured to complete the foregoing method, and as shown in fig. 2, the base station includes: setting unit 201, transmitting unit 202, MLB controller 203, SPSA controller 204, MRO controller 205, SAT 206.
The setting unit 201 is configured to set a parameter update frequency f according to a frequency setting principledMLB controller driving frequency f for mobile load balancingMLBOptimizing MRO controller drive frequency f by moving robustnessMROSAT driving frequency f of saturation threshold controllerSATAnd synchronous disturbance random approximation algorithm SPSA controller drive frequency fspssa.
The frequency setting principle comprises: f isMLBIs less than or equal to fdSaid fSATIs equal to fdSaid fMROIs greater than fSPSASaid fSPSAF or moreHPI(ii) a Wherein, the fHPIThe time for the performance of each controller to reach the stable state after the parameters Ocs, Hys and TTT are adjusted is the reciprocal of the time. Optionally, at said fHPIIn the case of 0.2Hz, the setting unit 201 may set the driving frequencies of the MLB controller, the MRO controller, the SAT, and the SPSA controller to: f. ofd=20Hz,fMLB=2Hz,fMRO=2Hz,fSAT=20Hz,fSPSA=0.2Hz。
A transmitting unit 202 for transmitting at a frequency fdInputting updated cell load ρ to the MLB controller and SATcInputting the updated HOF, the switching ping-pong effect HPP and the call drop rate CDR to the MRO controller and the SPSA controller.
The base station will cycle by cycleTo statistically update the parameters, HOF, HPP and CDR. In the prior art, a base station calculates a performance index parameter ρ of an MLB controller according to parameters Ocs, Hys and TTT in each controllercAnd the performance indicator parameters HOF, HPP and CDR of the MRO controller, the specific calculation methods thereof being well known to those skilled in the art and not described in detail herein. The transmission unit 202 calculates the obtained ρ every 0.05scInputting the data into the MLB controller and the SAT, and updating the rho values in the MLB controller and the SATcAnd inputting the counted parameters HOF, HPP and CDR into the MRO controller and the SPSA controller, and updating the three parameter values HOF, HPP and CDR in the MRO controller and the SPSA controller. And the controllers jointly adjust the adjusting parameters Ocs, Hys and TTT of the MRO and MLB functions according to the continuously updated parameters, so that the system is comprehensive and optimal.
MLB controller 203 for controlling the frequency fMLBAccording to the updated rhocAnd updating the Ocs.
The transmitting unit 202 inputs the updated ρ to the MLB controller 203 every 0.05scValue, MLB controller 203 every otherAccording to the updated rho in MLBcAnd calculating the parameter Ocs, and updating the parameter Ocs in the MLB controller.
Optionally, in an initial state, that is, when the MLB controller is driven for the first time, the parameter Ocs in the MLB controller is a preset initial value Ocs1。
In a non-initial state, i.e., when the MLB controller 203 is driven i (i ≧ 1) th time, the Ocs is OcsiSaid OcsiEvery 0.5s can be calculated according to the following formula:
r is a preset serving cell load target value, if r is 0.5, it means that the adjustment target of the MLB controller 203 is such that the load of the serving cell of the cell is half of the bearable load; r is 1, it means that the adjustment target of the controller is such that the load of the serving cell is full. If the load rho of the cell serving cell counted by the current base stationcIf the load of the cell serving cell is larger than r, the load of the cell serving cell is adjusted to be smaller, and if the load of the cell serving cell is counted by the current base station, rhocLess than r will adjust the serving cell load in the larger direction. In this embodiment, the base station statistically updates the current load ρ every 0.05scThe MLB controller can track the current load rho in timecDifference from the target load r, the current load ρ is made by changing the value of OcscAnd continuously adjusting the load in the target direction to reach the preset target value r of the serving cell as much as possible. In addition, the specific value of r depends on the current network condition, and is the final target value of the load balancing of the serving cell.
Optionally, in this embodiment, the p is a function of the pcAnd Ocs of i-1 th updatei-1Calculating to obtain a0And b0There are two methods, one is the BGF algorithm and one is the slope estimation algorithm.
Wherein, the BGF algorithm is as follows:
the first time the MLB controller 203 is driven, the a0And b0Is a preset constant value a1And b1. At the moment, the Ocs is a preset initial value Ocs1。
The a is said at the non-initial state, i.e., the i-th time when the MLB controller 203 is driven0And b0This can be calculated by the following method:
calculating a filtered signal matrix WiW is as describediThe following formula is satisfied: <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>W</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>α</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msub>
<mi>W</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>+</mo>
<msub>
<mi>α</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mi>Δt</mi>
<msup>
<mfenced open='[' close=']'>
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<msub>
<mi>ρ</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
</msub>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<msub>
<mi>Ocs</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
</mfenced>
<mi>T</mi>
</msup>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> wherein, W1=[ρc Ocs1],α0Is the low pass filter bandwidth constant, Δ t is the time step for invoking the BGF algorithm;
according to the WiCalculating a gain matrix PiSaid P isiThe following formula is satisfied:wherein, P1Is a preset initial value P0;Is PiThe derivative with respect to time t satisfies the following equation:λias a forgetting factor, the following formula is satisfied:||Pi||2the following formula is satisfied for the Euclidean norm of the gain matrix: <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mrow>
<mo>|</mo>
<mo>|</mo>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>|</mo>
<mo>|</mo>
</mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<msqrt>
<msub>
<mi>λ</mi>
<mi>max</mi>
</msub>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<msubsup>
<mi>P</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
<mi>T</mi>
</msubsup>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</msqrt>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> is thatThe characteristic value of (2).
According to the WiAnd PiCalculating an estimated parameter vectorThe above-mentionedThe following formula is satisfied: <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>+</mo>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mover>
<mo>^</mo>
<mo>·</mo>
</mover>
</mover>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mi>Δt</mi>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> wherein, <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mfenced open='[' close=']'>
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<msub>
<mi>α</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>a</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<msub>
<mi>b</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
</mfenced>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mover>
<mo>^</mo>
<mo>·</mo>
</mover>
</mover>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<msubsup>
<mi>W</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
<mi>T</mi>
</msubsup>
<msub>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<msub>
<mi>W</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>ρ</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
</msub>
<mo>.</mo>
</mrow>
</math>
according to the aboveCalculating the a0And b0When the i-th driving MLB controller calculates the Ocs, the a0Is equal to aiSaid b is0Is equal to bi(ii) a Wherein, the aiThe following formula is satisfied:b isiThe following formula is satisfied:
the slope estimation algorithm is as follows:
the first time the MLB controller 203 is driven, the a0And b0Is a preset constant value a1And b1. At the moment, the Ocs is a preset initial value Ocs1。
The a is said at the non-initial state, i.e., the i-th time when the MLB controller 203 is driven0And b0This can be calculated by the following method:
calculating a filtered signal matrix WiW is as describediThe following formula is satisfied: <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>W</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>α</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msub>
<mi>W</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>+</mo>
<msub>
<mi>α</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mi>Δt</mi>
<msup>
<mfenced open='[' close=']'>
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<msub>
<mi>ρ</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
</msub>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<msub>
<mi>Ocs</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
</mfenced>
<mi>T</mi>
</msup>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> wherein, W1=[ρc Ocs1],α0Is the low pass filter bandwidth constant and Δ t is the time step to invoke the slope estimation algorithm.
According to the WiCalculating an estimated parameter vectorThe above-mentionedThe following formula is satisfied: <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>+</mo>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mover>
<mo>^</mo>
<mo>·</mo>
</mover>
</mover>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mi>Δt</mi>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> wherein, <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mfenced open='[' close=']'>
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<msub>
<mi>α</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>a</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<msub>
<mi>b</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
</mfenced>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mover>
<mo>^</mo>
<mo>·</mo>
</mover>
</mover>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<msubsup>
<mi>W</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
<mi>T</mi>
</msubsup>
<msub>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<msub>
<mi>W</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>ρ</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
</msub>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> and P is a preset gain matrix.
According to the aboveCalculating the a0And b0When the i-th driving MLB controller 203 calculates the Ocs, the a0Is equal to aiSaid b is0Is equal to bi(ii) a Wherein, the aiThe following formula is satisfied:b isiThe following formula is satisfied:
SPSA controller 204 for controlling the frequency fSPSAAccording to whatUpdating the HOF, HPP and CDR update hysteresis value perturbation value Hys*And time-to-trigger disturbance value TTT*And inputting the updated Hys to the MRO controller*And TTT*。
SPSA controller 204 cyclesThe Hys when the SPSA controller is driven for the jth time*Is equal to Hys* jThe TTT*Is equal to TTT* j;
Calculating Hys when the SPSA controller is driven for the 3n +1 th time*And TTT*Said Hys*And TTT*The following formula is satisfied:
Calculating loss parameters L + and TTT when the SPSA controller is driven for the 3n +2 times*And Hys*The L + and TTT*And Hys*The following formula is satisfied:
calculating the inverse loss parameter L-, Hys when the SPSA controller is driven for the 3n +3 times*And TTT*The L-TTT*And Hys*The following formula is satisfied:
It should be noted here that the HOF, HPP and CDR are updated every 0.05s, and the TTT and Hys are updated every 0.5 s.
MRO controller 205 for controlling the frequency fMROAccording to the updated HOF, HPP and CDR and the updated Hys*And TTT*Updating hysteresis value Hys and optimizing time to trigger TTTmroAnd inputting an updated TTT to the SATmro。
Optionally, the MRO controller cyclesAccording to the Hys*And TTT*Calculating a gamma value, the gamma value satisfying the following formula:
if gamma is less than or equal to the preset lower limit value, Hys and TTTmroThe following formula is satisfied:
TTTmro=TTT*-ymro,Hys=Hys*;
if gamma is greater than or equal to a preset lower limit value and less than or equal to a preset upper limit value, Hys and TTTmroThe following formula is satisfied:
TTTmro=TTT*-ymro,Hys=Hys*-ymro。
if gamma is greater than or equal to a preset upper limit value, Hys and TTTmroThe following formula is satisfied:
TTTmro=TTT*,Hys=Hys*-ymro。
wherein, said ymroAt a frequency fMROCalculated according to the updated HOF, HPP and CDR, ymroSatisfy the requirement of w1、w2、w3Is a preset parameter weight value.
It should be noted that the preset lower limit and the preset upper limit may be set according to the specific situation of the actual scene, and are not fixed, and they function to make the ratio of Hys and TTT always stable within a proper range. In this embodiment, the preset lower limit value may be set to 20 °, and the preset upper limit value may be set to 80 °.
For a preset parameter weight value w1、w2、w3In general, operators place more importance on HOF and CDR, i.e., w1And w3General ratio w2Large, so that said ymroIn most cases positive values. Thus, the MRO controller is paired with the TTT*And Hys*The adjustment of (c) is generally to remain unchanged or to a small direction, i.e. to a direction more favorable for the HOF and CDR.
SAT 206 for use at a frequency fSATAccording to the updated rhocAnd the updated TTTmroThe time to trigger TTT is updated.
SAT 206 in cyclesAccording to rhocCalculating a value of l, the value of l satisfying the following formula:
l=1+(1-ρc)·15
if TTTmroIf the value is less than the value of l, the TTT is equal to the TTTmro;
If TTTmroAnd if the value is larger than the value of l, the TTT is equal to l.
I.e. every 0.05s the SAT is updated with TTT, which is the performance index parameter HOF, HPP and CDR of the MRO controller and the performance index parameter p of the MLB controllercAre jointly decided.
As shown in fig. 2, the transmission unit 202 updates the parameter ρ every 0.05scHOF, HPP and CDR are sent to each controller so that each controller updates the parameters every 0.05 s.
At time t-0, the MLB controller, the SPSA controller, the MRO controller, and the SAT are sequentially operated once. In the next time, the SAT runs once every 0.05s, and the adjusting parameter TTT influencing the MRO is updated and updated; the MLB controller runs once every 0.5s, and updates an adjusting parameter Ocs influencing the MLB; the MRO controller runs once every 0.5s, and updates adjustment parameters Hys and TTT influencing the MROmroAnd TTTmroInputting to the SAT so that the SAT updates the TTT every 0.05 s; the SPSA updates Hys every 5s*And TTT*And combining said Hys*And TTT*Input to the MRO controller so that the MRO controller updates Hys and TTTmro。
The embodiment of the invention provides a method and a base station for mobile robustness optimization and mobile load balancing, which can be combined with performance index parameters HOF, HPP and CDR of an MRO controller and performance index parameter rho of an MLB controllercThe parameters Hys, TTT and Ocs are adjusted together, namely, two functions of mobile robustness optimization and mobile load balancing are adjusted jointly.
Those of ordinary skill in the art will understand that: all or part of the steps for implementing the method embodiments may be implemented by hardware related to program instructions, and the program may be stored in a computer readable storage medium, and when executed, the program performs the steps including the method embodiments; and the aforementioned storage medium includes: various media that can store program codes, such as ROM, RAM, magnetic or optical disks.
The above description is only for the specific embodiment of the present invention, but the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto, and any changes or substitutions that can be easily conceived by those skilled in the art within the technical scope of the present invention are included in the scope of the present invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the present invention shall be subject to the protection scope of the appended claims.
Claims (12)
1. A method for mobile robustness optimization and mobile load balancing, comprising:
setting parameter update frequency f according to frequency setting principledMLB controller driving frequency f for mobile load balancingMLBOptimizing MRO controller drive frequency f by moving robustnessMROSAT driving frequency f of saturation threshold controllerSATAnd synchronous disturbance random approximation algorithm SPSA controller driving frequency fSPSA;
At a frequency fdInputting updates to MLB controller and SATCell load of rhocInputting updated handover failure rate HOF, handover ping-pong effect HPP and call drop rate CDR to the MRO controller and the SPSA controller;
MLB controller at frequency fMLBAccording to the updated rhocUpdating the specific offset Ocs of the user to the serving cell;
SPSA controller with frequency fSPSAUpdating a hysteresis value perturbation value Hys and a trigger time perturbation value TTT according to the updated HOF, HPP and CDR, and inputting the updated Hys and TTT to the MRO controller;
MRO controller at frequency fMROUpdating hysteresis values Hys and optimal time-to-trigger TTT based on the updated HOF, HPP and CDR and the updated Hys and TTTmroAnd inputting an updated TTT to the SATmro;
SAT at frequency fSATAccording to the updated rhocAnd the updated TTTmroUpdating the time to trigger TTT;
the frequency setting principle comprises:
f isMLBIs less than or equal to fdSaid fSATIs equal to fdSaid fMROIs greater than fSPSASaid fSPSAF or moreHPI(ii) a Wherein, the fHPIThe time for the performance of each controller to reach the stable state after the parameters Ocs, Hys and TTT are adjusted is the reciprocal of the time.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the MLB controller is at a frequency fMLBAccording to the updated rhocThe updating Ocs specifically comprises the following steps:
when the MLB controller is driven for the ith time, the Ocs is updated to Ocsi;
When i is equal to 1, the Ocs is a preset initial value Ocs1;
When i is an integer greater than 1, the OcsiThe following formula is satisfied:
wherein r is a preset serving cell load target value; rho, Q and R are preset constants, a0And b0According to the updated rhocAnd Ocs of i-1 th updatei-1And (6) calculating.
3. The algorithm of claim 2, wherein a is0And b0According to the updated rhocAnd Ocs of i-1 th updatei-1The calculation specifically includes: calculating the a according to a BGF algorithm0And b0(ii) a Wherein the a is calculated according to the BGF algorithm0And b0The method comprises the following specific steps:
calculating a filtered signal matrix WiW is as describediThe following formula is satisfied:wherein, W1=[ρc Ocs1],α0Is the bandwidth constant of the low-pass filter, and Δ t is the time step for calling the BGF algorithm;
according to the WiCalculating a gain matrix PiSaid P isiThe following formula is satisfied:wherein, P1Is a preset initial value P0;Is PiThe derivative with respect to time t satisfies the following equation:λifor the forgetting factor, the following formula is satisfied||Pi||2The following formula is satisfied for the Euclidean norm of the gain matrix: is thatA characteristic value of (d);
according to the WiAnd PiCalculating an estimated parameter vectorThe above-mentionedThe following formula is satisfied: <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>+</mo>
<msub>
<mover>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mo>·</mo>
</mover>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mi>Δt</mi>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> wherein, <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mfenced open='[' close=']'>
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<msub>
<mi>α</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>a</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<msub>
<mi>b</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
</mfenced>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mover>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mo>·</mo>
</mover>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<msubsup>
<mi>W</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
<mi>T</mi>
</msubsup>
<msub>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<msub>
<mi>W</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>ρ</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
</msub>
<mo>;</mo>
</mrow>
</math>
according to the aboveCalculating the a0And b0When the i-th driving MLB controller calculates the Ocs, the a0Is equal to aiSaid b is0Is equal to bi(ii) a Wherein, the aiThe following formula is satisfied:b isiThe following formula is satisfied:
4. the algorithm of claim 2, wherein a is0And b0According to the rhocAnd Ocs of i-1 th updatei-1The calculation specifically includes: calculating the a according to a slope estimation algorithm0And b0(ii) a Wherein the a is calculated according to the slope estimation algorithm0And b0The method comprises the following specific steps:
calculating a filtered signal matrix WiW is as describediThe following formula is satisfied:wherein, W1=[ρc Ocs1],α0Is the low pass filter bandwidth constant, Δ t is the time step for invoking the slope estimation algorithm;
according to the WiCalculating an estimated parameter vectorThe above-mentionedThe following formula is satisfied: <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>+</mo>
<msub>
<mover>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mo>·</mo>
</mover>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mi>Δt</mi>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> wherein, <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mfenced open='[' close=']'>
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<msub>
<mi>α</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>a</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<msub>
<mi>b</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
</mfenced>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mover>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mo>·</mo>
</mover>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>P</mi>
<msubsup>
<mi>W</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
<mi>T</mi>
</msubsup>
<msub>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<msub>
<mi>W</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>ρ</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
</msub>
<mo>;</mo>
</mrow>
</math> the P is a preset gain matrix;
according to the aboveCalculating the a0And b0When the i-th driving MLB controller calculates the Ocs, the a0Is equal to aiSaid b is0Is equal to bi(ii) a Wherein, the aiThe following formula is satisfied:b isiThe following formula is satisfied:
5. the method of claim 1, wherein the SPSA controller is at a frequency fSPSAUpdating a hysteresis value perturbation value Hys and a trigger time perturbation value TTT according to the updated HOF, HPP and CDR, and inputting the updated Hys and TTT to the MRO controller specifically comprises:
SPSA controller with frequency fSPSAThe Hys is equal to Hys when the SPSA controller is driven for the j timejSaid TTT is equal to TTTj;
Then, when the SPSA controller is driven 3n +1 times, Hys and TTT are calculated, and satisfy the following equations:
calculating loss parameters L +, TTT and Hys when the SPSA controller is driven for the 3n +2 times, wherein the L +, TTT and Hys satisfy the following formulas:
calculating back loss parameters L-, Hys and TTT when the SPSA controller is driven for the 3n +3 times, wherein the L-, TTT and Hys satisfy the following formulas:
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the MRO controller is at a frequency fMROUpdating hysteresis values Hys and optimal time-to-trigger TTT based on the updated HOF, HPP and CDR and the updated Hys and TTTmroAnd inputting an updated TTT to the SATmroThe method specifically comprises the following steps:
at a frequency fMROCalculating a gamma value from the Hys and TTT, the gamma value satisfying the following formula:
if gamma is less than or equal to the preset lower limit value, Hys and TTTmroThe following formula is satisfied:
TTTmro=TTT*-ymrohys = Hys ″; wherein, said ymroAt a frequency fMROCalculated according to the updated HOF, HPP and CDR, ymroSatisfy the requirement ofw1、w2、w3The parameter weight value is preset;
if gamma is greater than or equal to a preset lower limit value and less than or equal to a preset upper limit value, Hys and TTTmroThe following formula is satisfied:
TTTmro=TTT*-ymro,Hys=Hys*-ymro;
if gamma is greater than or equal to a preset upper limit value, Hys and TTTmroThe following formula is satisfied:
TTTmro=TTT*,Hys=Hys*-ymro。
7. the method of claim 1 wherein the SAT is at a frequency fSATAccording to the updated rhocAnd the updated TTTmroThe update trigger time TTT specifically includes:
at a frequency fSATAccording to rhocCalculating a value of l, the value of l satisfying the following formula:
l=1+(1-ρc)·15
if TTTmroIf the value is less than the value of l, the TTT is equal to the TTTmro;
If TTTmroAnd if the value is larger than the value of l, the TTT is equal to l.
8. A base station, comprising:
a setting unit for setting the parameter update frequency f according to the frequency setting principledMLB controller driving frequency f for mobile load balancingMLBOptimizing MRO controller drive frequency f by moving robustnessMROSAT driving frequency f of saturation threshold controllerSATAnd synchronous disturbance random approximation algorithm SPSA controller driving frequency fSPSA;
A transmitting unit for transmitting at a frequency fdInputting updated cell load ρ to the MLB controller and SATcInputting updated HOF, switching ping-pong effect HPP and call drop rate CDR to the MRO controller and the SPSA controller;
MLB controller for controlling at frequency fMLBAccording to the updated rhocUpdating the specific offset Ocs of the user to the serving cell;
SPSA controller for controlling at a frequency fSPSAUpdating a hysteresis value perturbation value Hys and a trigger time perturbation value TTT according to the updated HOF, HPP and CDR, and inputting the updated Hys and TTT to the MRO controller;
MRO controller for controlling the frequency fMROUpdating hysteresis values Hys and optimal time-to-trigger TTT based on the updated HOF, HPP and CDR and the updated Hys and TTTmroAnd inputting an updated TTT to the SATmro;
SAT for use at frequency fSATAccording to said updateρcAnd the updated TTTmroUpdating the time to trigger TTT;
the frequency setting principle comprises: f isMLBIs less than or equal to fdSaid fSATIs equal to fdSaid fMROIs greater than fSPSASaid fSPSAF or moreHPI(ii) a Wherein, the fHPIThe time for the performance of each controller to reach the stable state after the parameters Ocs, Hys and TTT are adjusted is the reciprocal of the time.
9. The base station of claim 8, wherein the MLB controller is specifically configured to:
at a frequency fMLBDriving an MLB controller;
when the MLB controller is driven for the ith time, the Ocs is updated to Ocsi;
When i is equal to 1, the Ocs is a preset initial value Ocs1;
When i is an integer greater than 1, the OcsiThe following formula is satisfied:
wherein r is a preset serving cell load target value; rho, Q and R are preset constants, a0And b0According to the updated rhocAnd Ocs of i-1 th updatei-1Calculating to obtain;
wherein, the a0And b0According to the updated rhocAnd Ocs of i-1 th updatei-1The obtaining of the calculation specifically comprises calculating the a according to a BGF algorithm0And b0The method comprises the following specific steps:
calculating a filtered signal matrix WiW is as describediThe following formula is satisfied:wherein, W1=[ρc Ocs1],α0Is the bandwidth constant of the low-pass filter, and Δ t is the time step for calling the BGF algorithm;
according to the WiCalculating a gain matrix PiSaid P isiThe following formula is satisfied:wherein, P1Is a preset initial value P0;Is PiThe derivative with respect to time t satisfies the following equation:λias a forgetting factor, the following formula is satisfied:||Pi||2the following formula is satisfied for the Euclidean norm of the gain matrix: is thatA characteristic value of (d);
according to the WiAnd PiCalculating an estimated parameter vectorThe above-mentionedThe following formula is satisfied: <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>+</mo>
<msub>
<mover>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mo>·</mo>
</mover>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mi>Δt</mi>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> wherein, <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mfenced open='[' close=']'>
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<msub>
<mi>α</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>a</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<msub>
<mi>b</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
</mfenced>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mover>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mo>·</mo>
</mover>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<msubsup>
<mi>W</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
<mi>T</mi>
</msubsup>
<msub>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<msub>
<mi>W</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>ρ</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
</msub>
<mo>;</mo>
</mrow>
</math>
according to the aboveCalculating the a0And b0When the i-th driving MLB controller calculates the Ocs, the a0Is equal to aiSaid b is0Is equal to bi(ii) a Wherein, the aiThe following formula is satisfied:b isiThe following formula is satisfied:
or, calculating the a according to the slope estimation algorithm0And b0The method comprises the following specific steps:
calculating a filtered signal matrix WiW is as describediThe following formula is satisfied:wherein, W1=[ρc Ocs1],α0Is the bandwidth constant of the low-pass filter, and Δ t is the time step for calling the BGF algorithm;
according to the WiCalculating an estimated parameter vectorThe above-mentionedThe following formula is satisfied: <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>+</mo>
<msub>
<mover>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mo>·</mo>
</mover>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mi>Δt</mi>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> wherein, <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mfenced open='[' close=']'>
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<msub>
<mi>α</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>a</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<msub>
<mi>b</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
</mfenced>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mover>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mo>·</mo>
</mover>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>P</mi>
<msubsup>
<mi>W</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
<mi>T</mi>
</msubsup>
<msub>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> <math>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<msub>
<mi>W</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>^</mo>
</mover>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>ρ</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
</msub>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
</math> the P is a preset gain matrix;
according to the aboveCalculating the a0And b0When the i-th driving MLB controller calculates the Ocs, the a0Is equal to aiSaid b is0Is equal to bi(ii) a Wherein, the aiThe following formula is satisfied:b isiThe following formula is satisfied:
10. the base station of claim 8, wherein the SPSA controller is specifically configured to:
SPSA controller with frequency fSPSAThe Hys is equal to Hys when the SPSA controller is driven for the j timejSaid TTT is equal to TTTj;
Then, when the SPSA controller is driven 3n +1 times, Hys and TTT are calculated, and satisfy the following equations:
calculating loss parameters L +, TTT and Hys when the SPSA controller is driven for the 3n +2 times, wherein the L +, TTT and Hys satisfy the following formulas:
calculating back loss parameters L-, Hys and TTT when the SPSA controller is driven for the 3n +3 times, wherein the L-, TTT and Hys satisfy the following formulas:
11. The base station of claim 8, wherein the MRO controller is specifically configured to:
at a frequency fMROCalculating a gamma value from the Hys and TTT, the gamma value satisfying the following formula: <math>
<mrow>
<mi>γ</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mi>arctan</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>Hys</mi>
<mo>*</mo>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<mi>TTT</mi>
<mo>*</mo>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
</math>
if gamma is less than or equal to the preset lower limit value, Hys and TTTmroThe following formula is satisfied:
TTTmro=TTT*-ymrohys = Hys ″; wherein, said ymroAt a frequency fMROCalculated according to the updated HOF, HPP and CDR, ymroSatisfy the requirement ofw1、w2、w3The parameter weight value is preset;
if gamma is greater than or equal to a preset lower limit value and less than or equal to a preset upper limit value, Hys and TTTmroThe following formula is satisfied:
TTTmro=TTT*-ymro,Hys=Hys*-ymro;
if gamma is greater thanEqual to the preset upper limit value, Hys and TTTmroThe following formula is satisfied:
TTTmro=TTT*,Hys=Hys*-ymro。
12. the base station of claim 8, wherein the SAT is specifically configured for
At a frequency fSATAccording to rhocCalculating a value of l, the value of l satisfying the following formula:
l=1+(1-ρc)·15
if TTTmroIf the value is less than the value of l, the TTT is equal to the TTTmro;
If TTTmroAnd if the value is larger than the value of l, the TTT is equal to l.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201210074014.9A CN102625365B (en) | 2012-03-20 | 2012-03-20 | Method for mobility robustness optimization (MRO) and mobility load balancing (MLB) and base station |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201210074014.9A CN102625365B (en) | 2012-03-20 | 2012-03-20 | Method for mobility robustness optimization (MRO) and mobility load balancing (MLB) and base station |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN102625365A CN102625365A (en) | 2012-08-01 |
CN102625365B true CN102625365B (en) | 2014-07-30 |
Family
ID=46565006
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201210074014.9A Expired - Fee Related CN102625365B (en) | 2012-03-20 | 2012-03-20 | Method for mobility robustness optimization (MRO) and mobility load balancing (MLB) and base station |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN102625365B (en) |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103024749B (en) * | 2011-09-27 | 2016-01-13 | 华为技术有限公司 | A kind of method and apparatus of Dynamic Spectrum Management |
CN103906073B (en) * | 2012-12-28 | 2017-10-17 | 华为技术有限公司 | Covering and capacity optimization method, equipment and system |
EP2944119B1 (en) * | 2013-01-11 | 2017-05-17 | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | A method and a network node for improved resource utilization in a load balanced radio communication system |
CN105007594B (en) * | 2015-06-04 | 2018-06-15 | 重庆邮电大学 | A kind of method of combined optimization MLB and MRO in LTE-A heterogeneous networks |
CN110850712B (en) * | 2018-08-20 | 2023-08-22 | 富士电机株式会社 | Design device and design method for control device |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101626590A (en) * | 2009-08-04 | 2010-01-13 | 中国科学技术大学 | Method for preventing conflict between moving load balance and moving robustness optimization function |
CN101932015A (en) * | 2009-06-19 | 2010-12-29 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Handoff parameter adjusting method and device |
CN101990223A (en) * | 2009-08-03 | 2011-03-23 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Switching preprocessing method and base stations |
CN102111830A (en) * | 2009-12-28 | 2011-06-29 | 上海无线通信研究中心 | Method for distinguishing causes of radio link failure (RLF) |
WO2011131221A1 (en) * | 2010-04-19 | 2011-10-27 | Nokia Siemens Networks Oy | Method and device for data processing in a wireless network |
-
2012
- 2012-03-20 CN CN201210074014.9A patent/CN102625365B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101932015A (en) * | 2009-06-19 | 2010-12-29 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Handoff parameter adjusting method and device |
CN101990223A (en) * | 2009-08-03 | 2011-03-23 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Switching preprocessing method and base stations |
CN101626590A (en) * | 2009-08-04 | 2010-01-13 | 中国科学技术大学 | Method for preventing conflict between moving load balance and moving robustness optimization function |
CN102111830A (en) * | 2009-12-28 | 2011-06-29 | 上海无线通信研究中心 | Method for distinguishing causes of radio link failure (RLF) |
WO2011131221A1 (en) * | 2010-04-19 | 2011-10-27 | Nokia Siemens Networks Oy | Method and device for data processing in a wireless network |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN102625365A (en) | 2012-08-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN102625365B (en) | Method for mobility robustness optimization (MRO) and mobility load balancing (MLB) and base station | |
US20220272546A1 (en) | Network planning based on crowd-sourced access point data for 5g or other next generation network | |
Schmelz et al. | A coordination framework for self-organisation in LTE networks | |
US20230209586A1 (en) | Location aware radio resource management in co-existing public and non-public communication networks using predictions | |
Huang et al. | Self-adapting handover parameters optimization for SDN-enabled UDN | |
US10979986B1 (en) | Facilitating adaptive power spectral density with chromatic spectrum optimization in fifth generation (5G) or other advanced networks | |
US20200314821A1 (en) | Coordinated beam forming for 5g or other next generation network | |
Karam et al. | Performance analysis of ranking for QoS handover algorithm for selection of access network in heterogeneous wireless networks | |
CN113661676B (en) | Selecting an uplink transmission band in a wireless network | |
WO2021244765A1 (en) | Improving operation of a communication network | |
Iacoboaiea et al. | SON Coordination for parameter conflict resolution: A reinforcement learning framework | |
WO2021089863A1 (en) | Methods for controlling a configuration parameter in a telecommunications network and related apparatus | |
CN107395596A (en) | A kind of refusal service attack defending method based on redundant manipulator switching | |
Li et al. | Machine learning based handover performance improvement for LTE-R | |
Combes et al. | Coordination of autonomic functionalities in communications networks | |
Capdevielle et al. | Self-optimization of handover parameters in LTE networks | |
Qin et al. | AQ-learning approach for mobility robustness optimization in Lte-Son | |
Tashan et al. | Voronoi-based handover self-optimization technique for handover ping-pong reduction in 5G networks | |
CN104735730A (en) | Switchover optimization method suitable for target base station in heterogeneous network | |
US10757630B2 (en) | Network abstractor for advanced interactive SDN optimization | |
WO2022075899A1 (en) | Network slice dynamic congestion control | |
Singh et al. | Optimizing user association and activation fractions in heterogeneous wireless networks | |
US20220394727A1 (en) | Scheduling method, scheduling algorithm training method, related system, and storage medium | |
WO2023208451A1 (en) | Nr framework for beam prediction in the spatial domain | |
De Domenico et al. | Backhaul-aware small cell DTX based on fuzzy Q-Learning in heterogeneous cellular networks |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
C14 | Grant of patent or utility model | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee | ||
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20140730 Termination date: 20160320 |