CN102564844A - Method for measuring compact tension specimen fracture parameters by using double extensometers - Google Patents
Method for measuring compact tension specimen fracture parameters by using double extensometers Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN102564844A CN102564844A CN2011104523758A CN201110452375A CN102564844A CN 102564844 A CN102564844 A CN 102564844A CN 2011104523758 A CN2011104523758 A CN 2011104523758A CN 201110452375 A CN201110452375 A CN 201110452375A CN 102564844 A CN102564844 A CN 102564844A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- ctod
- curve
- extensometers
- load
- value
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Abstract
The invention discloses a novel method for measuring compact tension specimen fracture parameters by using double extensometers. The novel method comprises the following steps of: measuring two opening displacements by using the double extensometers; obtaining a crack tip opening displacement (CTOD) of a compact tension test through calculation by using a triangular relation; and calculating a CTOD value under each load and a nominal stress corresponding to the CTOD value, and obtaining a relation between the nominal stress and the CTOD, thereby obtaining a CTOD design curve of the compact tension test. The fracture parameter test method disclosed by the invention has the characteristics of simpleness, easy operation, simpleness for processing data, high precision of a critical CTOD value, comprehensive data, large information quantity, freeness from test precision influences of other parameters, such as strength, Young modulus, rotary factor and load, capabilities of obtaining the CTOD data of the whole test loading process and obtaining the CTOD design curve of the compact tension test under an actual board thickness condition.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of metal material fracture toughness technical field of measurement and test technology, particularly a kind of method that adopts two extensometers measurement compact tensile specimen fracture parameters.
Background technology
Crack tip opening displacement (hereinafter referred " CTOD " is expressed as " δ ") and CTOD design curve are the important parameters in the elastic-plastic fracture mechanics, are widely used in the safe reliability assessment of hardware.
At present, the measuring method to the critical CTOD value of compact tensile specimen mainly contains: flexibility method, profile method, the microscope direct method of measurement.The flexibility method test period is short, in practical operation, obtained using widely, but measuring accuracy is lower; Profile method and microscope direct method of measurement precision are high, but because the making complicacy of section causes the test period long, are not widely used.
(1) flexibility method
" Unified method of test for the determination of quasistatic fracture toughness " and " the uniform tests method of GB/T 21143-2007 metal material quasistatic fracture toughness " regulation adopts flexibility method to measure the CTOD value.Flexibility method is according to characteristic load p, opening displacement plasticity component V
p, crack length a and material parameter (yield strength R
P0.2, elastic modulus E), the computing formula of utilizing flexibility method to derive to obtain is calculated the CTOD value.This method is simple to operation; Test period is short, but because twiddle factor r has adopted unified recommendation, does not consider the influence of the strength of materials, specimen size and crack length; Can have influence on the computational accuracy of critical CTOD value, computational accuracy also receives yield strength R simultaneously
P0.2Influence with the elastic modulus E test error.
(2) profile method
Recommend among the appendix J of standard " the uniform tests method of GB/T 21143-2007 metal material quasistatic fracture toughness " to adopt profile method to measure the CTOD value.Profile method is with the section of the sample after the unloading; In enlargement factor is the opening displacement that 30 ~ 50 times microscopically is directly measured crack tip; This method principle is simple, measuring accuracy is high, but owing to be the crack tip opening displacement after the test unloading, measured value is the plasticity part δ of CTOD value
p, and section preparation process operation is complicated, and the test period is long, is not suitable for large-scale application.
(3) the microscope direct method of measurement
Document " A method for the metallographical measurement of the CTOD at cracking initiation and the role of reverse plasticity on unloading " has proposed a kind of method that adopts microscope directly to measure crack tip opening displacement; The operation of this method is consistent with profile method; Just the position of test is distinguished to some extent; This method measuring accuracy is high, but has the deficiency identical with profile method.
At present, the CTOD design curve mainly contains the design curve that records based on test in the standards such as design curve, CVDA-84 and JWES2805 that propose based on people such as D-B Model Design curve, Wells and Burdekin, the EPRI method design curve that EPRI-Electric Power Research Institute proposes.D-B modelling curve is based on certain hypothesis, the scope of application less (σ < 0.6 σ s); Wells, Burdekin, CVDA-84 and JWES2805 design curve are based on the design curve of test experience, and precision is relatively poor; The design curve that the EPRI method proposes is based on Finite Element Method and calculates, and precision is higher, but difficulty in computation is big, and does not consider the influence of actual plate thickness, can not provide the CTOD design curve under the actual (real) thickness.
(1) D-B modelling curve
D-B modelling curve be with real crack length and plastic zone radius as effective crack length, find the solution by Castigliano and to obtain crack tip opening displacement.D-B modelling curve has been ignored the material hardening effect when theory is found the solution, the scope of application is less, and only is applicable to that the central burst that is stretched is dull and stereotyped.
(2) Wells, Burdekin, CVDA-84 and JWES2805 design curve
People such as Wells, Burdekin uses foil gauge to test the relation of norminal strain and CTOD, and has drawn different design curves.People's such as Wells design curve is based on that a large amount of tests obtain, in theory analytically and unsuccessful.Standard such as CVDA-84 and JWES2805 has adopted the comparatively conservative result who obtains in people such as the Wells test to make design curve.These design curves are crossed all based on test, lack theoretical the support, and result of calculation is too conservative and only be applicable to that the central burst that is stretched is dull and stereotyped.
(3) EPRI design curve
The EPRI design curve adopts Finite Element Method to calculate the J integration, and calculates the CTOD design curve according to the relation of J integration and CTOD.EPRI design curve precision is high, be applicable to the compact tension specimen test, but difficulty in computation is big, and does not consider the influence of actual plate thickness can not provide the design curve under the actual plate thickness.
To compact tensile specimen, the public reported that can accurately measure the CTOD design curve method of testing under critical CTOD value and the actual (real) thickness condition is not simultaneously also arranged, there is not corresponding patent to announce yet.
Summary of the invention
Technical matters to be solved by this invention provides a kind of method that adopts two extensometers to measure the compact tensile specimen fracture parameters, and is simple to operate and can accurately measure CTOD design curve under critical CTOD value and the actual (real) thickness condition.
For the purpose that realizes solving the problems of the technologies described above, the present invention has adopted following technical scheme:
A kind of method that adopts two extensometers measurement compact tensile specimen fracture parameters of the present invention; Described parameter is critical CTOD value and CTOD design curve; CTOD is that crackle Free Surface each point actual measurement opening displacement curve cathetus partly is extrapolated to the resulting opening displacement of crack tip; Be characterised in that: adopt two extensometers to measure crackle place 2 different displacements of locating of plane respectively simultaneously, this two places displacement is expressed as V respectively
1, V
2Utilize the permanent principle of setting up of whole loading process intermediate cam shape relation; Calculate CTOD value and corresponding nominal stress under each load, obtained the relation curve of nominal stress σ and crack opening displacement δ, i.e. the CTOD design curve; The ratio of the plus load of σ representation unit thickness and the tough bandwidth that do not ftracture, concrete measuring method is:
1) adopting two extensometers to measure the P-V curve is two corresponding opening displacement V of maximum load point on load-displacement curve
1, V
2, utilize triangular relationship, calculate the CTOD critical value of compact tension specimen test, the CTOD critical value is the corresponding CTOD value of maximum load point on the P-V curve:
In the formula, δ is crack opening displacement, also is CTOD, and a is a crack length, and h is the distance of second extensometer apart from specimen surface, V
1, V
2Be respectively the opening displacement that two extensometers record; First extends counts apart from the nearer extensometer of crack tip, extends for second and counts apart from crack tip extensometer far away;
2) adopt two extensometers to record the V under each load
1, V
2Value; And (1) formula of bringing into is calculated CTOD value and corresponding nominal stress σ under each load; The σ calculating formula has obtained the series data point of nominal stress σ and corresponding C TOD suc as formula shown in (2), and data point is adopted least square fitting; Remove parameter c, the d of the exponential function in match (3) formula, promptly obtain the CTOD design curve of compact tension specimen test;
In the formula, σ is a nominal stress, and P is a load, and B is the thickness of sample, and W is a specimen width, and a is a crack length;
In the formula, δ is the CTOD value, and σ is a nominal stress, and c and d are the exponential function parameter.
The test philosophy of this patent is: adopt two extensometers opening displacement V of two diverse locations in real time record crackle plane, place respectively in the process of the test of the two extensometer test of compact tension specimen test CTOD simultaneously
1, V
2Variation with load; Utilize the similar calculating crack tip opening displacement of triangle CTOD, can obtain according to Similar Principle of Triangle:
Derivation draws the expression formula of crack tip opening displacement CTOD:
Wherein: δ---crack tip opening displacement
V
1, V
2---two opening displacements that extensometer records respectively
A---crack length
H---second extensometer is apart from the distance of specimen surface
The width of W---sample
R (W-a)---plastic hinge mechanism center of rotation is apart from the distance of crack tip
Through adopting technique scheme, the present invention has following beneficial effect:
The critical CTOD value of test gained is compared with flexibility method, and measuring accuracy is high, data processing is simple; Compare with the microscope direct method of measurement with profile method, the test period is short, and is simple to operate.Test gained CTOD design curve calculates between gained plane stress and the plane strain design curve at EPRI, has obtained the design curve under the actual (real) thickness.
Fracture parameter method of testing of the present invention is simple, data processing is simple; Critical CTOD value precision is high, not influenced by the measuring accuracy of other parameter such as intensity, Young modulus, twiddle factor, load etc.; Data are comprehensive, can obtain testing the CTOD data that load whole process; Contain much information, can obtain the CTOD design curve of the compact tension specimen test under the actual plate thickness condition.
Description of drawings
Fig. 1 is the two extensometer test of compact tension specimen test CTOD synoptic diagram.
Among the figure, 1-first extensometer, 2-second extensometer.Adopt two extensometers opening displacement V of two diverse locations in real time record crackle plane, place respectively in the process of the test simultaneously
1, V
2Variation with load.
Fig. 2 is the schematic diagram that utilizes the similar calculating crack tip opening displacement of triangle CTOD.
Fig. 3 is the P-V curve of compact tension specimen test, i.e. load-displacement curve.
Fig. 4 is the CTOD design curve of compact tension specimen test, i.e. σ-δ curve.
Fig. 5 is the comparison of the design curve of actual measurement design curve and the calculating of EPRI method.
Embodiment
Embodiment 1
Adopt two extensometer methods to test the fracture parameter of hull structural steel A36 steel plate; Compact tensile specimen is of a size of 20mm * 50mm * 48mm; Prefabricating fatigue crack length is 27.86mm, and two extensometers are clamped in specimen surface respectively and apart from the position of specimen surface 25mm.The mechanical property of this steel plate is following: yield strength 380MPa, tensile strength 530MPa, reduction of area 74.5%, elongation after fracture 33%, elastic modulus 217GPa.
Two extensometers write down the opening displacement V of 2 of tests simultaneously
1, V
2, to shut down when being loaded on maximum load, the load-displacement curve that measures is as shown in Figure 3.Two extensometers record maximum load respectively and put pairing opening displacement V
1, V
2Be respectively 2.23mm and 3.72mm.Bring test value into formula (1) and calculate critical CTOD value for 0.570mm.Record the V under each load
1, V
2Value is also calculated corresponding C TOD value and the series data point of corresponding nominal stress σ; It is as shown in Figure 4 that series data point line gets the CTOD design curve of compact tension specimen test; Typical data point to the curve among Fig. 4 adopts least square method to carry out match; The parameter c, the d that obtain exponential function are respectively 1.09 and 15.6, and (3) formula that parameter is brought into obtains CTOD design curve formula, shown in (3-2) formula:
Table 1 is a CTOD design curve typical data point.
Table 1 CTOD design curve typical data point
| σ（Mpa） | 80 | 83 | 85 | 88 | 90 | 93 | 95 |
| δ（mm） | 0.0053 | 0.0094 | 0.01369 | 0.0235 | 0.0334 | 0.0557 | 0.0776 |
| σ（Mpa） | 98 | 100 | 103 | 105 | 106 | 108 | 110 |
| δ（mm） | 0.1261 | 0.1728 | 0.2739 | 0.3700 | 0.4287 | 0.5739 | 0.7641 |
Calculate the CTOD value according to flexibility method and be 0.608mm, microscope direct method of measurement actual measurement CTOD value is 0.577, and result of calculation and flexibility method, microscopic method test result contrast as shown in table 2.The deviation of flexibility method and microscopic method measured value is 6.6%, and two extensometer method test value and microscopic method measured value deviation reduce to 1.2%.
Table 2 pair extensometer method, National Standard Method and the contrast of microscope mensuration δ test result
Calculate the compact tension specimen that obtains respectively under plane strain and the plane stress condition according to the EPRI method and test the CTOD design curve suc as formula shown in (3-3) and the formula (3-4).For compact tensile specimen; Compare CTOD design curve and pair CTOD design curve that the test of extensometer methods obtains that the EPRI method calculates, as shown in Figure 5: the CTOD design curve that test obtains is between plane stress that is calculated by the EPRI method and plane strain design curve.
(plane stress) (3-4)
Claims (1)
1. one kind is adopted two extensometers to measure the method for compact tensile specimen fracture parameter; It is characterized in that: described parameter is critical CTOD value and CTOD design curve; CTOD is that crackle Free Surface each point actual measurement opening displacement curve cathetus partly is extrapolated to the resulting opening displacement of crack tip; Be characterised in that: adopt two extensometers to measure crackle place 2 different displacements of locating of plane respectively simultaneously, this two places displacement is expressed as V respectively
1, V
2Utilize the permanent principle of setting up of whole loading process intermediate cam shape relation; Calculate CTOD value and corresponding nominal stress under each load, obtained the relation curve of nominal stress σ and crack opening displacement δ, i.e. the CTOD design curve; The ratio of the plus load of σ representation unit thickness and the tough bandwidth that do not ftracture, concrete measuring method is:
1) adopting two extensometers to measure the P-V curve is two corresponding opening displacement V of maximum load point on load-displacement curve
1, V
2, utilize triangular relationship, calculate the CTOD critical value of compact tension specimen test, the CTOD critical value is the corresponding CTOD value of maximum load point on the P-V curve:
In the formula, δ is crack opening displacement, also is CTOD, and a is a crack length, and h is the distance of second extensometer apart from specimen surface, V
1, V
2Be respectively the opening displacement that two extensometers record; First extends counts apart from the nearer extensometer of crack tip, extends for second and counts apart from crack tip extensometer far away;
2) adopt two extensometers to record the V under each load
1, V
2Value; And (1) formula of bringing into is calculated CTOD value and corresponding nominal stress σ under each load; The σ calculating formula has obtained the series data point of nominal stress σ and corresponding C TOD suc as formula shown in (2), and data point is adopted least square fitting; Remove parameter c, the d of the exponential function in match (3) formula, promptly obtain the CTOD design curve of compact tension specimen test;
(2)
In the formula, σ is a nominal stress, and P is a load, and B is the thickness of sample, and W is a specimen width, and a is a crack length;
In the formula, δ is the CTOD value, and σ is a nominal stress, and c and d are the exponential function parameter.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN2011104523758A CN102564844B (en) | 2011-12-30 | 2011-12-30 | Method for measuring compact tension specimen fracture parameters by using double extensometers |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN2011104523758A CN102564844B (en) | 2011-12-30 | 2011-12-30 | Method for measuring compact tension specimen fracture parameters by using double extensometers |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN102564844A true CN102564844A (en) | 2012-07-11 |
| CN102564844B CN102564844B (en) | 2013-07-31 |
Family
ID=46410849
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN2011104523758A Active CN102564844B (en) | 2011-12-30 | 2011-12-30 | Method for measuring compact tension specimen fracture parameters by using double extensometers |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN102564844B (en) |
Cited By (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105136531A (en) * | 2015-07-23 | 2015-12-09 | 成都航天龙宇质检技术有限公司 | Compact tensile sample used in material performance test |
| CN105486556A (en) * | 2015-12-04 | 2016-04-13 | 山东钢铁股份有限公司 | Steel plate strain impact sample processing method |
| CN105865901A (en) * | 2016-05-18 | 2016-08-17 | 中国石油集团海洋工程有限公司 | Double-propping head incubator for low-temperature CTOD (Crack Tip Opening Displacement) tests |
| CN106290000A (en) * | 2016-08-26 | 2017-01-04 | 中航动力股份有限公司 | A kind of sample for measuring high temperature fracture toughness and preparation method thereof |
| CN107121337A (en) * | 2017-03-14 | 2017-09-01 | 华北水利水电大学 | The method that fracture toughness and intensity are determined by the small-size test piece of bilateral joint-cutting |
| CN109580397A (en) * | 2019-01-29 | 2019-04-05 | 内蒙古科技大学 | A kind of method and device measuring fatigue crack growth rate |
| CN112393969A (en) * | 2020-10-27 | 2021-02-23 | 中国石油天然气集团有限公司 | Axial surface type crack steel pipe explosion test device and fracture resistance evaluation method thereof |
| CN116738780A (en) * | 2023-05-29 | 2023-09-12 | 天津大学 | Compact tensile sample fatigue crack propagation length and rate calculation method considering crack deflection |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101183058A (en) * | 2007-12-04 | 2008-05-21 | 浙江工业大学 | Calculating machinery of T type cuniform spreading load application test sample key point data |
| JP2009236540A (en) * | 2008-03-26 | 2009-10-15 | Ihi Corp | Fracture performance evaluation method of welded structure, and database apparatus |
| CN101726445A (en) * | 2008-10-23 | 2010-06-09 | 宝山钢铁股份有限公司 | Method and test specimen for acquiring material parameters related to metal plate strain rate |
| CN102023116A (en) * | 2010-10-14 | 2011-04-20 | 中国人民解放军空军工程大学 | Test analysis method for bolt connecting piece fatigue crack expanding |
-
2011
- 2011-12-30 CN CN2011104523758A patent/CN102564844B/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101183058A (en) * | 2007-12-04 | 2008-05-21 | 浙江工业大学 | Calculating machinery of T type cuniform spreading load application test sample key point data |
| JP2009236540A (en) * | 2008-03-26 | 2009-10-15 | Ihi Corp | Fracture performance evaluation method of welded structure, and database apparatus |
| CN101726445A (en) * | 2008-10-23 | 2010-06-09 | 宝山钢铁股份有限公司 | Method and test specimen for acquiring material parameters related to metal plate strain rate |
| CN102023116A (en) * | 2010-10-14 | 2011-04-20 | 中国人民解放军空军工程大学 | Test analysis method for bolt connecting piece fatigue crack expanding |
Cited By (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105136531B (en) * | 2015-07-23 | 2018-06-29 | 四川航天谦源科技有限公司 | For the compact tensile specimen of material properties test |
| CN105136531A (en) * | 2015-07-23 | 2015-12-09 | 成都航天龙宇质检技术有限公司 | Compact tensile sample used in material performance test |
| CN105486556A (en) * | 2015-12-04 | 2016-04-13 | 山东钢铁股份有限公司 | Steel plate strain impact sample processing method |
| CN105865901A (en) * | 2016-05-18 | 2016-08-17 | 中国石油集团海洋工程有限公司 | Double-propping head incubator for low-temperature CTOD (Crack Tip Opening Displacement) tests |
| CN105865901B (en) * | 2016-05-18 | 2018-12-11 | 中国石油集团海洋工程有限公司 | Low temperature CTOD test Double Tops head incubator |
| CN106290000A (en) * | 2016-08-26 | 2017-01-04 | 中航动力股份有限公司 | A kind of sample for measuring high temperature fracture toughness and preparation method thereof |
| CN107121337A (en) * | 2017-03-14 | 2017-09-01 | 华北水利水电大学 | The method that fracture toughness and intensity are determined by the small-size test piece of bilateral joint-cutting |
| CN107121337B (en) * | 2017-03-14 | 2019-09-24 | 华北水利水电大学 | The method that fracture toughness and intensity are determined by the small-size test piece of bilateral joint-cutting |
| CN109580397A (en) * | 2019-01-29 | 2019-04-05 | 内蒙古科技大学 | A kind of method and device measuring fatigue crack growth rate |
| CN112393969A (en) * | 2020-10-27 | 2021-02-23 | 中国石油天然气集团有限公司 | Axial surface type crack steel pipe explosion test device and fracture resistance evaluation method thereof |
| CN112393969B (en) * | 2020-10-27 | 2023-01-10 | 中国石油天然气集团有限公司 | Axial surface type crack steel pipe explosion test device and fracture resistance evaluation method thereof |
| CN116738780A (en) * | 2023-05-29 | 2023-09-12 | 天津大学 | Compact tensile sample fatigue crack propagation length and rate calculation method considering crack deflection |
| CN116738780B (en) * | 2023-05-29 | 2024-01-26 | 天津大学 | Compact tensile sample fatigue crack propagation length and rate calculation method considering crack deflection |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN102564844B (en) | 2013-07-31 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN102564844B (en) | Method for measuring compact tension specimen fracture parameters by using double extensometers | |
| CN103149024B (en) | The measurement apparatus of three-point bending mechanical property and method | |
| CN204718883U (en) | A kind of fixture for arbitrarily angled bending test | |
| CN104198313A (en) | Residual stress detection method based on instrumented indentation technology | |
| CN201828459U (en) | Measuring device for percentage elongation after fracture of tensile test piece | |
| CN103776707A (en) | Testing platform for concrete bent load | |
| CN202648597U (en) | Coupling sleeve step surface to stepped hole surface depth measuring gauge | |
| CN103234419A (en) | Forging length size online quantifying inspection tool | |
| JP5760244B2 (en) | Low cycle fatigue crack growth evaluation method | |
| CN204240906U (en) | Basic active piece lengths measurement mechanism | |
| CN202710416U (en) | Electro-hydraulic servo bending cyclic loading fatigue testing device | |
| CN202195993U (en) | Hardness testing device | |
| CN205909768U (en) | Utensil is examined to energy storage connecting rod depth of parallelism | |
| CN201688794U (en) | Quick position evaluation tool | |
| CN104655489A (en) | Method for measuring stress concentration at weld toe of butt joint of thick plates | |
| CN203981152U (en) | High and the parallelism detecting device of bearing bush radius projection | |
| CN207540916U (en) | A kind of device for drawing the novel curve of rock core relative hardness | |
| CN103196759B (en) | Detection apparatus and detection method of displacement of force application point used for testing rock fracture toughness | |
| CN102927935B (en) | A kind of single crystal hollow blade wall thickness ultrasonic detection method | |
| CN103383234A (en) | Device for measuring parallelism of guide rail swallow tail surface | |
| CN201373731Y (en) | Gradient-cutting automatic measuring instrument at end of steel pipe | |
| CN203657794U (en) | Deformation measurement device used under ultra high temperature environment | |
| CN103175460A (en) | Checking tool special for measuring depth of round-corner undercut groove of crankshaft | |
| CN201885656U (en) | Measuring device for height difference between planes | |
| CN103091162A (en) | Method for measuring prescribed total elongation strength Rt value of hot rolled coil |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| C14 | Grant of patent or utility model | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |