CN102542144A - Ship performance evaluation method - Google Patents
Ship performance evaluation method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN102542144A CN102542144A CN201010612954XA CN201010612954A CN102542144A CN 102542144 A CN102542144 A CN 102542144A CN 201010612954X A CN201010612954X A CN 201010612954XA CN 201010612954 A CN201010612954 A CN 201010612954A CN 102542144 A CN102542144 A CN 102542144A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- ship
- evaluation
- performance
- score value
- valuation
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Abstract
The invention discloses a ship performance evaluation method, which not only adopts direct parameter comparison and relative coefficient comparison, but also carries out comprehensive evaluation on the main performance of the ship by an innovative subjective evaluation method from five different angles of performance advance property, construction economy, operation economy, ship form applicability and arrangement advance property, and can simultaneously evaluate the comprehensive economic technology indexes of the ship from the angles of ship construction party (shipyard) and user party (shipowner). Therefore, the evaluation method is more comprehensive and objective in the ship performance evaluation, has comparability and traceability of credibility in the evaluation result, has popularization and application value in ship industries in China, and is expected to have certain theoretical significance and engineering practical application value in ship design scheme argumentation, ship form optimization, ship scientific research achievement evaluation and the like in China.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to valuation of ship performance method in, particularly a kind of sea transport boats and ships performance multi-angle evaluation method.
Background technology
The Chinese vessel industry gets at the beginning of the international shipping market from it; Always the catch up with and surpass target of the advanced ship-related products of Japan and Korea S's shipyard, but be the problem that Shipbuilding of China circle is paid close attention to how from the main performance level that quantizes to go to estimate ship-related products with objective angle as oneself always.
The evaluation of boats and ships at present is general sets a reference ship type according to the ship type earlier, then several ship types (sample ship type) relatively of Dynamic Selection.Select for use boats and ships that the more advanced Japan and Korea S shipyard of performance builds as the reference ship type in principle, for each ship type, the reference ship type have only one and during certain in remain unchanged.Make like this and estimate the mode that forms fixed correlation between ship type and the reference ship type, make evaluation result that suitable credibility and comparability arranged.It is main that sample ship type provides ship type and the design institute of design and shipyard previous generation ship type with the ship type of Japan and Korea S's shipyard design-build, external design corporation.
At present the evaluation method of boats and ships generally is divided into direct parameter relative method and two kinds of relative coefficient relative methods, and the direct parameter relative method is exactly that difference and percentage that differs and corresponding chart are directly compared, listed to the main performance data of evaluation boats and ships and the data of reference ship type/sample ship type.The relative coefficient relative method adopts to the evaluation boats and ships of not shipmate kind of the characteristics relative coefficient that calculates of coefficient formulas relatively, and International Maritime Organization (IMO) (IMO) efficiency design index and baseline value ratio, and output " multiaxis radar type " comparison diagram.
There is a general shortcoming in above-mentioned two kinds of evaluation methods, are exactly that evaluation result can not quantize, have certain limitation and one-sidedness, and therefore the evaluation to boats and ships tends to occur error.From " eight or five " beginning, relevant ministries and commissions of country have progressively strengthened shipbuilding industry innovation supporting dynamics, and the design institute of China and shipbuilding enterprise have strengthened ship type exploitation dynamics and scientific research input, and also design-build goes out the many types of world-class boats and ships that have.But on the whole, compare bigger gap in addition with the design of Japan and Korea S shipyards, the advanced boats and ships built.Therefore shipbuilding industry is badly in need of a kind of practicality and the evaluation method that can quantize comes ship type development and design proposal are estimated.
Summary of the invention
To the deficiency of above-mentioned prior art, the technical matters that the present invention will solve provides a kind of practicality and the evaluation method that can quantize comes ship type development and design proposal are carried out evaluation method.
For solving the problems of the technologies described above, the present invention adopts following technical scheme:
A kind of valuation of ship performance method, it comprises the steps:
(1) set a reference ship type, and according to the some sample ships of reference ship type Dynamic Selection type;
(2) the valuation of ship performance index is divided into advanced in performance property, construction economy, operation economy, ship type adaptability and advanced five scoring items of configuration; Again with each scoring item based on need further resolving into different groups; And the weight coefficient of each group of setting; Then subjective innovative point in each group or thin of evaluation are enumerated, itemized, and each subitem is set corresponding score value and weight coefficient;
(3) adopt direct parameter comparison method or relative coefficient comparison method to compare to estimating ship type and sample ship type; Draw the score value of each subitem; Draw the score value of each group then based on the different weight coefficient of each subitem, draw the score value of each scoring item again based on the different weight coefficient of each group;
(4) score value with each scoring item adopts multiaxis radar type comparison diagram to represent, or sets the respective weights coefficient for each scoring item score value again and represent with the form of estimating total points at last.
Preferably, different weight coefficients being set in step (4) will estimate total points and be divided into construction side and estimate total points and user and estimate aspect two of the total points.
Preferably, in step (3), each scoring item all is provided with the certain basis branch.
Preferably, the equal value of said weight coefficient is based on the analytical hierarchy process of operational research.
Technique scheme has following beneficial effect: this valuation of ship performance method not only adopts direct parameter comparison, relative coefficient relatively; And the boats and ships main performance is carried out comprehensive evaluation from advanced in performance property, the innovative point subjective estimate method of building economy, operation economy, ship type adaptability and advanced five different angles of configuration; The angle that can take into account shipbuilding side's (shipyard) and user (shipowner) is simultaneously weighed the mixed economy technical indicator of boats and ships; Therefore adopt this evaluation method more comprehensive, objective to the evaluation of ship performance; Evaluation result have suitable credibility mutually than property and trackability; Shipbuilding industry has application value in China, will have certain theoretical significance and engineering actual application value to China's Ship Design demonstration, the optimization of ship type, the evaluation of boats and ships scientific payoffs etc.
Description of drawings
The boats and ships that Fig. 1 draws for the embodiment of the invention are estimated score multiaxis radar type comparison diagram
Embodiment
Below in conjunction with accompanying drawing preferred embodiment of the present invention is described in detail.
When this valuation of ship performance method is implemented; At first set a reference ship type; And according to the some sample ships of reference ship type Dynamic Selection type, it is main that sample ship type provides ship type and the design institute of design and shipyard previous generation ship type with the ship type of Japan and Korea S's shipyard design-build, external design corporation.For each ship type, the reference ship type have only one and during certain in remain unchanged, make like this and estimate the mode that forms fixed correlation between ship type and the reference ship type, make evaluation result that suitable credibility and comparability arranged.
Then the valuation of ship performance index is divided into advanced in performance property, construction economy, operation economy, ship type adaptability and advanced five scoring items of configuration; Again each scoring item is further resolved into different groups; And the weight coefficient of each group of setting; Grouping can be carried out according to actual needs,, Ship Structure overall like: boats and ships, cargo system, ship equipment and fitting-out, engine room facilities and system, marine electrical equipment, designing technique and build process etc.Then more subjective innovative point in each group or thin of evaluation are enumerated, itemized; And again each subitem is set corresponding score value and weight coefficient; Each subitem all should be set the corresponding weights coefficient, and the value of weight coefficient is based on the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) of operational research.
After the score value of each subitem and weight coefficient configure; Adopt direct parameter relative method or relative coefficient relative method to compare to estimating ship type and sample ship type; Draw the score value of each subitem; Draw the score value of each group then according to the different weight coefficient of each subitem, draw the score value of each scoring item again according to the different weight coefficient of each group, consider to ship performance only above-mentioned five scoring item evaluations to be still had certain limitation and one-sidedness; Therefore, each scoring item will be provided with limitation and the one-sidedness that certain basis score value (end branch) dwindles subjective assessment.Can the score value of each scoring item be adopted multiaxis radar type comparison diagram to represent (as shown in Figure 1) at last.
Also can set the corresponding weights coefficient to the score value of each scoring item as required, evaluation result just can show with the form of total points like this.Can be as required in the actual evaluation process be divided into the side of constructioning evaluation total points Pb and user and estimate two of total points Po and stress face estimating total points; Two weight coefficients that stress the face setting are respectively Wb and Wo.
Construction side estimates total points Pb computing formula like this
The user estimates total points Po computing formula
Can gather into table with estimating total points, carry out ranking, contrast respectively, can draw like this estimating the overall evaluation of ship performance according to two scores that stress face.
This valuation of ship performance method not only adopts direct parameter comparison, relative coefficient relatively; And the boats and ships main performance is carried out comprehensive evaluation from advanced in performance property, the innovative point subjective estimate method of building economy, operation economy, ship type adaptability and advanced five different angles of configuration; The angle that can take into account shipbuilding side's (shipyard) and user (shipowner) is simultaneously weighed the mixed economy technical indicator of boats and ships; Therefore adopt this evaluation method more comprehensive, objective to the evaluation of ship performance; Evaluation result have suitable credibility mutually than property and trackability; Shipbuilding industry has application value in China, will have certain theoretical significance and engineering actual application value to China's Ship Design demonstration, the optimization of ship type, the evaluation of boats and ships scientific payoffs etc.This evaluation method is applicable to the real ship Performance Analysis of bulk freighter, crude oil carrier, product carrier/chemical tanker, container ship and liquefied gas carrier, and other ship kind also can be with reference to application.
More than the valuation of ship performance method that the embodiment of the invention provided has been carried out detailed introduction; For one of ordinary skill in the art; According to the thought of the embodiment of the invention, on embodiment and range of application, all can change to some extent, so this description only is used in the embodiment of the invention is described; Should not be construed as limitation of the present invention, all any changes of making according to design philosophy of the present invention are all within protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (4)
1. a valuation of ship performance method is characterized in that it comprises the steps:
(1) set a reference ship type, and according to the some sample ships of reference ship type Dynamic Selection type;
(2) the valuation of ship performance index is divided into advanced in performance property, construction economy, operation economy, ship type adaptability and advanced five scoring items of configuration; Again with each scoring item based on need further resolving into different groups; And the weight coefficient of each group of setting; Then subjective innovative point in each group or thin of evaluation are enumerated, itemized, and each subitem is set corresponding score value and weight coefficient;
(3) adopt direct parameter comparison method or relative coefficient comparison method to compare to estimating ship type and sample ship type; Draw the score value of each subitem; Draw the score value of each group then based on the different weight coefficient of each subitem, draw the score value of each scoring item again based on the different weight coefficient of each group;
(4) score value with each scoring item adopts multiaxis radar type comparison diagram to represent, or sets the respective weights coefficient for each scoring item score value again and represent with the form of estimating total points at last.
2. valuation of ship performance method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: different weight coefficients is set in step (4) will estimates total points and be divided into construction side and estimate total points and user and estimate aspect two of the total points.
3. valuation of ship performance method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: in step (3), each scoring item all is provided with the certain basis branch.
4. valuation of ship performance method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: the equal value of said weight coefficient is based on the analytical hierarchy process of operational research.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201010612954XA CN102542144A (en) | 2010-12-29 | 2010-12-29 | Ship performance evaluation method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201010612954XA CN102542144A (en) | 2010-12-29 | 2010-12-29 | Ship performance evaluation method |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN102542144A true CN102542144A (en) | 2012-07-04 |
Family
ID=46349018
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201010612954XA Pending CN102542144A (en) | 2010-12-29 | 2010-12-29 | Ship performance evaluation method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN102542144A (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103970023A (en) * | 2014-03-08 | 2014-08-06 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | Level analysis based ship steering gear equivalence analysis method |
| CN104778353A (en) * | 2015-04-01 | 2015-07-15 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司江汉油田分公司勘探开发研究院 | Deep well brine resource evaluation method |
| CN112562120A (en) * | 2020-12-16 | 2021-03-26 | 镇江赛尔尼柯自动化有限公司 | Tugboat-based intelligent ship energy efficiency management method |
| WO2023220864A1 (en) * | 2022-05-16 | 2023-11-23 | 广东逸动科技有限公司 | Evaluation method, evaluation apparatus, electronic device, and computer-readable storage medium |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4071898A (en) * | 1976-06-14 | 1978-01-31 | Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Company | Ship performance analyzer |
| EP0215500A2 (en) * | 1985-09-06 | 1987-03-25 | Shell Internationale Researchmaatschappij B.V. | Method and system for monitoring ship performance |
| CN101519117A (en) * | 2009-04-17 | 2009-09-02 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | Ship rudder/wing rudder-fin/wing fin combined control method |
-
2010
- 2010-12-29 CN CN201010612954XA patent/CN102542144A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4071898A (en) * | 1976-06-14 | 1978-01-31 | Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Company | Ship performance analyzer |
| EP0215500A2 (en) * | 1985-09-06 | 1987-03-25 | Shell Internationale Researchmaatschappij B.V. | Method and system for monitoring ship performance |
| CN101519117A (en) * | 2009-04-17 | 2009-09-02 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | Ship rudder/wing rudder-fin/wing fin combined control method |
Non-Patent Citations (7)
| Title |
|---|
| 刘永葆等: "AHP在大型船舶动力系统总体性能分析中的应用研究", 《海军工程大学学报》 * |
| 刘郑国等: "基于AHP法的舰炮武器系统设计方案决策", 《舰船电子工程》 * |
| 张勇慧等: "基于AHP的运输船舶多目标模糊综合评判", 《系统工程理论与实践》 * |
| 张志勇: "用德尔菲法建立船舶行业数字化评价指标体系", 《DEFENSE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY》 * |
| 曾广武等: "舰艇综合性能优化中的层次分析模糊综合评判方法及其程序系统开发", 《中国舰船研究》 * |
| 李碧英: "绿色船舶及其评价指标体系研究", 《中国造船》 * |
| 许立坤等: "船东风险评估及实证研究", 《中国造船》 * |
Cited By (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103970023A (en) * | 2014-03-08 | 2014-08-06 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | Level analysis based ship steering gear equivalence analysis method |
| CN104778353A (en) * | 2015-04-01 | 2015-07-15 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司江汉油田分公司勘探开发研究院 | Deep well brine resource evaluation method |
| CN104778353B (en) * | 2015-04-01 | 2017-11-17 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司江汉油田分公司勘探开发研究院 | Deep-well Brine resources evaluation method |
| CN112562120A (en) * | 2020-12-16 | 2021-03-26 | 镇江赛尔尼柯自动化有限公司 | Tugboat-based intelligent ship energy efficiency management method |
| WO2023220864A1 (en) * | 2022-05-16 | 2023-11-23 | 广东逸动科技有限公司 | Evaluation method, evaluation apparatus, electronic device, and computer-readable storage medium |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Lindstad et al. | Decarbonizing maritime transport: The importance of engine technology and regulations for LNG to serve as a transition fuel | |
| Endresen et al. | A historical reconstruction of ships' fuel consumption and emissions | |
| Barreiro et al. | Review of ship energy efficiency | |
| Brynolf et al. | Environmental assessment of marine fuels: liquefied natural gas, liquefied biogas, methanol and bio-methanol | |
| CN102542144A (en) | Ship performance evaluation method | |
| Winebrake et al. | Pollution tradeoffs for conventional and natural gas-based marine fuels | |
| Thompson | Virtual hull monitoring of a naval vessel using hindcast data and reconstructed 2-D wave spectra | |
| Tronstad Lund et al. | Global-mean temperature change from shipping toward 2050: improved representation of the indirect aerosol effect in simple climate models | |
| Thompson | Fatigue damage variation within a class of naval ships | |
| Anantharaman et al. | Data analysis to evaluate reliability of a main engine | |
| Kao et al. | AIS-based scenario simulation for the control and improvement of ship emissions in ports | |
| Ridwan et al. | Potensi umkm dalam penguatan bumdes desa cempaka dengan pendekatan abcd di era pandemi covid-19 | |
| Zhu et al. | New insight into the wave-induced nonlinear vertical load effects of ultra-large container ships based on experiments | |
| Seo et al. | An analysis of container port efficiency in ASEAN | |
| Chen et al. | Response based design metocean conditions for a permanently moored FPSO during tropical cyclones: Estimation of greenwater risk | |
| Agis et al. | Unintentional consequences of the golden era of the Offshore Oil & Gas industry | |
| Aynur et al. | The determination of Turkish container ports performance with TOPSIS multiple criteria decision making method | |
| Perčić et al. | Alternative fuels for the marine sector and their applicability for purse seiners in a life-cycle framework | |
| Lin et al. | Multi-parameter stochastic inversion for first and second moment mass properties of a model-scale ship with topside ice accumulation | |
| Hörteborn et al. | Economic incentives and technological limitations govern environmental impact of LNG feeder vessels | |
| Li et al. | Prediction of stress spectra under low-period sea states | |
| Butarbutar et al. | Prospect of LNG as Marine Fuel in Indonesia: An Economic Review for a Case Study of 600 TEU Container Vessel | |
| Yang et al. | Promising strategies for the reduction of pollutant emissions from working vessels in offshore wind farms: The example of Taiwan | |
| Abdullah et al. | Economies of Scale in Seaborne Coal Transportation: A Case Study of İSDEMİR Port | |
| Islam et al. | Strategies to reduce carbon footprint in port and terminal operations: evidence from a developing country |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| C12 | Rejection of a patent application after its publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20120704 |