CN102522101A - Test method for determining whether storage system vibration reaches standard or not - Google Patents
Test method for determining whether storage system vibration reaches standard or not Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN102522101A CN102522101A CN2011104217625A CN201110421762A CN102522101A CN 102522101 A CN102522101 A CN 102522101A CN 2011104217625 A CN2011104217625 A CN 2011104217625A CN 201110421762 A CN201110421762 A CN 201110421762A CN 102522101 A CN102522101 A CN 102522101A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- hard disk
- test
- cabinet
- testing
- standard
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Landscapes
- Testing Electric Properties And Detecting Electric Faults (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a test method for determining whether storage system vibration reaches a standard or not, belonging to the storage system technology field. Test software is performance test software Iometre. The method is employing different positions and different environments to test hard disk performance and comparing performance test results of different conditions to measure whether a system reaches the standard or not. The method concretely comprises the following steps: (1) placing a hard disk outside a cabinet for testing, and operating Iometre to test sequential write performance of the hard disk; (2) placing the above single hard disk at each position of a storage cabinet to operate Iometre to test the sequential write performance of the hard disk, wherein the position is influenced by cabinet hardware, and carrying out comparison to check whether the influence of the cabinet hardware is large or not; (3) placing the above single hard disk on a full disk position to test Iometre hard disk sequential write performance, and determining whether resonant vibration between hard disks is large or not. Compared with the prior art, the method has the characteristics of low cost, a simple and convenient operation method, an accurate test result and the like.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to the memory system technologies field, specifically a kind of method of testing of judging that storage system vibration is whether up to standard.
Background technology
Hard disk is being brought into play more and more important effect in storage system, disk to go offline for the stability of system and safety of data be a very big threat, so the stability of disk is directly determining the stability and the security of storage system.
According to collecting a large amount of fault analysis statistical study that hard disk carries out; Cause the reason of hard disk failure to mainly contain three: 1, because the internet, applications client; The read-write flow is bigger, causes magnetic head tracking access time longer, so magnetic head and dish face contact probability increase greatly; When pressure increases suddenly,, air-flow increases thereby increasing the probability that causes magnetic head close contact dish face dish face.(causing that easily magnetic head flight height reduces) causes easily that also magnetic head and video disc bump when 2, power supply is unstable or during sudden power, causes scuffing.The waveform of recording disk when power supply is unstable, the figure that spreads out is very abnormal, very easily causes hard disk failure and the life-span that shortens hard disk.3, the vibration of storage system is defective: the vibration of cabinet is defective, and the mutual vibration effect between the disk chassis disk is vibrated such as a hard disk, can cause that other hard disk responds to, and magnetic head and dish face bump.Thereby cause the hard disk disk body to be scratched hard disk corruptions.
About the vibration problem of the 3rd storage system, at present modal is exactly to buy vibration analyzer to test, though test result is more directly perceived; Specialty accurately; But have two problems: 1, cost is high, and generally about several ten thousand yuan, cost is too high for the previous vibration analyzer price of order.2, vibration analyzer can only be tested certain data in a flash.Can not be simple and clear find out long data.
In sum, if adopt the vibration of vibration analyzer test macro, not only cost is high, and testing complex is loaded down with trivial details.
Summary of the invention
Whether technical assignment of the present invention provides a kind of can be fast simple test storage system aspects vibratility aspect qualified; Whether need to improve, judge that whether up to standard storage system vibrate method of testing so that increase stability and safety of data a kind of of system.
Technical assignment of the present invention realizes that by following mode testing software is performance test software I ometre, and method is the position different environment of taking different; The testing hard disk performance; Whether through the The performance test results under the different situations relatively, come the measurement system up to standard, the concrete grammar step is:
(1), test the outer monolithic hard disk of cabinet: a monolithic hard disk is placed the test of cabinet outside, move Iometre testing hard disk sequential write performance, the test duration is ten minutes; Can get ten minutes mean value like this, guarantee that the result is accurate, avoid the test of certain time point of vibration analyzer, exist fortuitous event to take place and the error that causes;
(2), test cabinet hardware vibration situation: Iometre testing hard disk sequential write performance is moved in each position that influenced by cabinet hardware that above-mentioned monolithic hard disk is placed on the storage cabinet, and each test duration is ten minutes; Can and step (1) more whether influenced by cabinet hardware bigger;
(3), testing hard disk resonance situation: above-mentioned monolithic hard disk is placed on test I ometre hard disk sequential write performance on the dishful position, and the time is ten minutes, can judge whether resonance is bigger between the hard disk.
The monolithic hard disk is 16 hard-disk slots.
In the step (2); Can from 16 hard-disk slots of above-mentioned monolithic hard disk, choose three to four positions according to the cabinet particular location; Can and step (1) more whether influenced by cabinet hardware bigger; Standard is 5%-7%, if relatively differ number percent below 5%, explains that the cabinet vibration is all right; Between 5%-7%, explain that the vibration situation is general, also have improvements; If surpass 7%, explain that the cabinet vibrational system is undesired, do not pass through, need design improvement again.
In the step (3), judge whether resonance is bigger between the hard disk, and standard is 5%-7%,, explain that the resonance of cabinet hard disk is all right if relatively differ number percent below 5%; Between 5%-7%, explain that the resonance situation is general, also have improvements; If surpass 7%, explain that the hard disk situation that resonates is undesired, do not pass through, need design casing structure again and hard disk support bracket improves.
Of the present inventionly a kind ofly judge storage system vibration whether method of testing up to standard have the following advantages:
1, reduces cost;
2, the testing mean of getting ten minutes makes the result more accurate, and the value of avoiding an intercepting to put sometime causes the result inaccurate because of fortuitous event;
3, method of operating is simple and convenient, and test environment does not need vibration analyzer, and operating personnel need not understand the vibration analyzer relevant knowledge yet.Thereby, have good value for applications.
Embodiment
With reference to specific embodiment to of the present invention a kind of judge storage system vibration method of testing up to standard done below explanation at length.
Embodiment:
A kind of method of testing of judging that storage system vibration is whether up to standard of the present invention; Testing software is performance test software I ometre; Method is the position different environment of taking different, the testing hard disk performance, through the The performance test results under the different situations relatively; Whether come the measurement system up to standard, the concrete grammar step is:
(1), test the outer monolithic hard disk of cabinet: a monolithic hard disk is placed the test of cabinet outside, move Iometre testing hard disk sequential write performance, the test duration is ten minutes; Can get ten minutes mean value like this, guarantee that the result is accurate, avoid the test of certain time point of vibration analyzer, exist fortuitous event to take place and the error that causes;
(2), test cabinet hardware vibration situation: Iometre testing hard disk sequential write performance is moved in each position that influenced by cabinet hardware that above-mentioned monolithic hard disk is placed on the storage cabinet, and each test duration is ten minutes; Can and step (1) more whether influenced by cabinet hardware bigger;
(3), testing hard disk resonance situation: above-mentioned monolithic hard disk is placed on test I ometre hard disk sequential write performance on the dishful position, and the time is ten minutes, can judge whether resonance is bigger between the hard disk.
The monolithic hard disk is 16 hard-disk slots.
In the step (2); Can from 16 hard-disk slots of above-mentioned monolithic hard disk, choose three to four positions according to the cabinet particular location; Can and step (1) more whether influenced by cabinet hardware bigger; Standard is 5%-7%, if relatively differ number percent below 5%, explains that the cabinet vibration is all right; Between 5%-7%, explain that the vibration situation is general, also have improvements; If surpass 7%, explain that the cabinet vibrational system is undesired, do not pass through, need design improvement again.
In the step (3), judge whether resonance is bigger between the hard disk, and standard is 5%-7%,, explain that the resonance of cabinet hard disk is all right if relatively differ number percent below 5%; Between 5%-7%, explain that the resonance situation is general, also have improvements; If surpass 7%, explain that the hard disk situation that resonates is undesired, do not pass through, need design casing structure again and hard disk support bracket improves.
A kind of method of testing of judging that storage system vibration is whether up to standard of the present invention except that the described technical characterictic of instructions, is the known technology of those skilled in the art.
Claims (4)
1. method of testing of judging that storage system vibration is whether up to standard; It is characterized in that testing software is performance test software I ometre; Method is the position different environment of taking different, the testing hard disk performance, through the The performance test results under the different situations relatively; Whether come the measurement system up to standard, the concrete grammar step is:
(1), test the outer monolithic hard disk of cabinet: a monolithic hard disk is placed the test of cabinet outside, move Iometre testing hard disk sequential write performance, the test duration is ten minutes;
(2), test cabinet hardware vibration situation: Iometre testing hard disk sequential write performance is moved in each position that influenced by cabinet hardware that above-mentioned monolithic hard disk is placed on the storage cabinet, and each test duration is ten minutes; Can and step (1) more whether influenced by cabinet hardware bigger;
(3), testing hard disk resonance situation: above-mentioned monolithic hard disk is placed on test I ometre hard disk sequential write performance on the dishful position, and the time is ten minutes, can judge whether resonance is bigger between the hard disk.
2. a kind of method of testing of judging that storage system vibration is whether up to standard according to claim 1 is characterized in that the monolithic hard disk is 16 hard-disk slots.
3. a kind of method of testing of judging that storage system vibration is whether up to standard according to claim 1 and 2; It is characterized in that in the step (2); Can from 16 hard-disk slots of above-mentioned monolithic hard disk, choose three to four positions according to the cabinet particular location, can and step (1) more whether influenced by cabinet hardware bigger, standard is 5%-7%; If relatively differ number percent, explain that the cabinet vibration is all right below 5%; Between 5%-7%, explain that the vibration situation is general, also have improvements; If surpass 7%, explain that the cabinet vibrational system is undesired, do not pass through, need design improvement again.
4. a kind of method of testing of judging that storage system vibration is whether up to standard according to claim 1; It is characterized in that in the step (3), judge whether resonance is bigger between the hard disk, and standard is 5%-7%; If relatively differ number percent, explain that the resonance of cabinet hard disk is all right below 5%; Between 5%-7%, explain that the resonance situation is general, also have improvements; If surpass 7%, explain that hard disk resonance situation is undesired, do not pass through.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN2011104217625A CN102522101A (en) | 2011-12-16 | 2011-12-16 | Test method for determining whether storage system vibration reaches standard or not |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN2011104217625A CN102522101A (en) | 2011-12-16 | 2011-12-16 | Test method for determining whether storage system vibration reaches standard or not |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN102522101A true CN102522101A (en) | 2012-06-27 |
Family
ID=46292996
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN2011104217625A Pending CN102522101A (en) | 2011-12-16 | 2011-12-16 | Test method for determining whether storage system vibration reaches standard or not |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN102522101A (en) |
Cited By (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104636225A (en) * | 2015-03-05 | 2015-05-20 | 浪潮电子信息产业股份有限公司 | Method for assessment of influences of server vibration on performances of magnetic disk |
| CN104637498A (en) * | 2015-02-25 | 2015-05-20 | 浪潮电子信息产业股份有限公司 | Method for testing effects on hard disk performance caused by system-level vibration |
| CN106776254A (en) * | 2016-12-09 | 2017-05-31 | 郑州云海信息技术有限公司 | A kind of automated testing method for assessing rack vibration to hard disk performance influence |
| CN108052441A (en) * | 2017-12-29 | 2018-05-18 | 郑州云海信息技术有限公司 | A kind of test method, system, device and the storage medium of hard disk performance level |
| CN108520762A (en) * | 2018-03-21 | 2018-09-11 | 西安交通大学 | Batch hard disk accelerated degradation test method and device under a kind of vibration environment |
| CN112326168A (en) * | 2020-10-23 | 2021-02-05 | 苏州浪潮智能科技有限公司 | Device and method for testing vibration performance of case fan module |
| CN112650635A (en) * | 2020-12-22 | 2021-04-13 | 宁畅信息产业(北京)有限公司 | Hard disk performance test method and simulated hard disk |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101872320A (en) * | 2010-04-16 | 2010-10-27 | 浪潮电子信息产业股份有限公司 | Method for reliability, performance test and statistic of SSD(Solid State Disk) |
| CN102087855A (en) * | 2009-12-08 | 2011-06-08 | 鸿富锦精密工业（深圳）有限公司 | Rotating vibration test system and method of storage equipment |
-
2011
- 2011-12-16 CN CN2011104217625A patent/CN102522101A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102087855A (en) * | 2009-12-08 | 2011-06-08 | 鸿富锦精密工业（深圳）有限公司 | Rotating vibration test system and method of storage equipment |
| CN101872320A (en) * | 2010-04-16 | 2010-10-27 | 浪潮电子信息产业股份有限公司 | Method for reliability, performance test and statistic of SSD(Solid State Disk) |
Cited By (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104637498A (en) * | 2015-02-25 | 2015-05-20 | 浪潮电子信息产业股份有限公司 | Method for testing effects on hard disk performance caused by system-level vibration |
| CN104637498B (en) * | 2015-02-25 | 2018-06-19 | 浪潮电子信息产业股份有限公司 | It is a kind of to test the system-level method for shaking and being influenced on hard disk performance |
| CN104636225A (en) * | 2015-03-05 | 2015-05-20 | 浪潮电子信息产业股份有限公司 | Method for assessment of influences of server vibration on performances of magnetic disk |
| CN106776254A (en) * | 2016-12-09 | 2017-05-31 | 郑州云海信息技术有限公司 | A kind of automated testing method for assessing rack vibration to hard disk performance influence |
| CN108052441A (en) * | 2017-12-29 | 2018-05-18 | 郑州云海信息技术有限公司 | A kind of test method, system, device and the storage medium of hard disk performance level |
| CN108520762A (en) * | 2018-03-21 | 2018-09-11 | 西安交通大学 | Batch hard disk accelerated degradation test method and device under a kind of vibration environment |
| CN112326168A (en) * | 2020-10-23 | 2021-02-05 | 苏州浪潮智能科技有限公司 | Device and method for testing vibration performance of case fan module |
| CN112650635A (en) * | 2020-12-22 | 2021-04-13 | 宁畅信息产业(北京)有限公司 | Hard disk performance test method and simulated hard disk |
| CN112650635B (en) * | 2020-12-22 | 2024-01-30 | 宁畅信息产业(北京)有限公司 | Hard disk performance test method and simulated hard disk |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN102522101A (en) | Test method for determining whether storage system vibration reaches standard or not | |
| US6950967B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for manufacture test processing a disk drive installed in a computer system | |
| US6412089B1 (en) | Background read scanning with defect reallocation | |
| CN102568522B (en) | The method of testing of hard disk performance and device | |
| US8448013B2 (en) | Failure-specific data collection and recovery for enterprise storage controllers | |
| US20090161243A1 (en) | Monitoring Disk Drives To Predict Failure | |
| US8418005B2 (en) | Methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture to diagnose temperature-induced memory errors | |
| US8904244B2 (en) | Heuristic approach for faster consistency check in a redundant storage system | |
| Shah et al. | Reliability analysis of disk drive failure mechanisms | |
| US20100262857A1 (en) | Data storage device including a failure diagnostic log | |
| US20070028041A1 (en) | Extended failure analysis in RAID environments | |
| US9099136B2 (en) | Method and system for hard disk drive throughput optimization using position error signaling | |
| CN102004693A (en) | System performance test method and device | |
| US7236321B1 (en) | Method for preventing data loss in a hard disk drive by projecting reduction in helium concentration using insitu non-repeatable runout | |
| US20140317443A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for testing a storage system | |
| Huang et al. | Characterizing disk health degradation and proactively protecting against disk failures for reliable storage systems | |
| US11237893B2 (en) | Use of error correction-based metric for identifying poorly performing data storage devices | |
| US8843781B1 (en) | Managing drive error information in data storage systems | |
| US7574918B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for detecting vibrations from a mechanical component | |
| EP1717811A2 (en) | Method and apparatus for time correlating deffects found on hard disks | |
| Lu et al. | Perseus: A {Fail-Slow} detection framework for cloud storage systems | |
| CN110928786A (en) | Testing method and device for financial program | |
| Shah et al. | Disk drive vintage and its effect on reliability | |
| CN102999504A (en) | Hard disk testing data analyzing method | |
| US7881006B2 (en) | Long-term asymmetry tracking in magnetic recording devices |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| C02 | Deemed withdrawal of patent application after publication (patent law 2001) | ||
| WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20120627 |