CN102521696A - Method for screening errors in electronic proofreading system - Google Patents
Method for screening errors in electronic proofreading system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN102521696A CN102521696A CN2011104094714A CN201110409471A CN102521696A CN 102521696 A CN102521696 A CN 102521696A CN 2011104094714 A CN2011104094714 A CN 2011104094714A CN 201110409471 A CN201110409471 A CN 201110409471A CN 102521696 A CN102521696 A CN 102521696A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- mistake
- school
- investigation
- examined
- common
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Stored Programmes (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a method for screening errors in an electronic proofreading system. The method comprises the following steps: the electronic proofreading system forcibly requires to screen common errors (namely, a plurality of quality control points are preset in a classifying manner) of electronic drawings before related personnel submit the electronic drawings or suggestions through the electronic proofreading system, and screening results of common errors (namely, a plurality of quality control points are preset in a classifying manner)) are stored into the electronic proofreading system. The error screening method is adopted to avoid the problem that the proofreading personnel ignores the errors within the quality control points and the condition that the same errors are frequently proposed to waste a lot of time, so that the proofreading quality and efficiency are fundamentally improved.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of mistake arrange distinguish method, the mistake arrange distinguish method in the system is examined in particularly a kind of electronics school.
Background technology
Along with popularizing of computer, the high speed development of software industry, the management of the prospective design industrial application of information technology has also obtained swift and violent development and has popularized.The development of information system management and the universal people's work that made things convenient for to a great extent.Along with the popularization and application of project management software, made informationalized project management be greatly improved in the last few years, in order to improve designing quality, it is indispensable examining for the school of design drawing.In the prior art, process is examined in the school generally will pass through following steps: (1) design, and the designer uses the design tool design drawing; (2) check and correction, the press corrector carries out the check and correction of drawing according to designer's drawing, and proposes the check and correction suggestion; (3) audit, the auditor according to check and correction through after drawing carry out the audit of drawing, and audit opinion is proposed; (4) approval, the drawing that the authorizing officer passes through according to audit carries out the final affirmation of drawing, also can propose suggestion for revision.In above step, each link personnel all need carry out the proposition that suggestion is examined in the school, confirms.
Yet; In establishing the careful process in school; Because a lot of schools are examined suggestion and repeated to propose, and also are the mistakes that the designer often violates, often propose identical mistake and spent a lot of times thereby cause the school to examine personnel's needs; Especially for the designer who has just crossed the threshold, then the school is examined personnel and is carried out the school and examine workload and just can not despise.
Summary of the invention
The technical matters that the present invention will solve provides a kind of electronics school and examines the mistake arrange distinguish method in the system; Force investigation (being that qualifying point is preset) through common mistake; Force the designer to check oneself; The careful personnel in standard school carry out the school by qualifying point and examine, and avoid leak school leakage to examine, and fundamentally improve quality and efficient that the school is examined.
For solving the problems of the technologies described above; The mistake arrange distinguish method in the system is examined in electronics of the present invention school; It is characterized in that: before the related personnel submits electronic drawing or suggestion through said electronics school in the careful system; Said electronics school is examined system's mandatory requirement said electronic drawing is carried out common mistake investigation, and common mistake investigation result is kept in the careful system in said electronics school.
Preferably, also be included in before said electronics school examines system and submit said electronic drawing or suggestion to, the said related personnel of system alert carries out common mistake investigation.
Preferably, the electronics school is examined in the system and is preserved a common fault library, is used to supply said related personnel to check investigation one by one.
Preferably, be divided into must investigation content and optional investigation content two kinds for the content in the said common fault library.
Preferably, said common fault library is provided with when examining system initialization in said electronics school, in system's operational process, safeguards and revise the content of said common fault library.
Preferably, said electronics school is examined in the system, and said related personnel comprises the designer, press corrector, auditor and authorizing officer.
Preferably, the careful system in said electronics school gathers all mistake investigation results automatically.
Mistake arrange distinguish method of the present invention; Directly adopted last time the technical management means to reduce even eliminate the method for frequent fault through examine system in the electronics school; Force investigation (being that qualifying point is preset) through common mistake, force the designer to check oneself, the careful personnel in standard school carry out the school by qualifying point and examine; Avoid leak school leakage to examine, fundamentally improve quality and efficient that the school is examined.Under the heavy situation of design objective, reduce the workload that personnel are examined in the school, thereby for guaranteeing that designing quality provides effective informationization technology means.
Description of drawings
Below in conjunction with accompanying drawing and embodiment the present invention is done further detailed explanation:
Fig. 1 is a mistake arrange distinguish method process flow diagram of the present invention;
Fig. 2 is a specific embodiment of the present invention.
The practical implementation method
In the careful system in electronics school, preserve a common fault library, the setting of this common mistake content (i.e. preset several qualifying points of classification) when system initialization, just can be provided with, and in operational process, the content of common mistake can be safeguarded and revised.Content in the said common fault library is divided into must investigation content and optional investigation content two kinds.
Establish, the school, examine, crowd personnel in the design cycle process, the electronics school is examined to set in the system and is reminded the handler to carry out common mistake investigation automatically, mode is: contrast the design error in the common fault library, one by one investigation.This prompting investigation is to be combined in the design school to examine in the flow process, force to carry out, thereby after guaranteeing that the related personnel must carry out the mistake investigation, flow process just can go on, and is easy and simple to handle, effective.With informationalized means, realized wanting under the traditional approach quality administration idea that realizes technically always.
Mistake arrange distinguish method of the present invention (referring to Fig. 1); Before related personnel (designer, press corrector, auditor and authorizing officer) submits electronic drawing or suggestion through the electronics school in the careful system; The electronics school is examined system's mandatory requirement electronic drawing is carried out common mistake investigation, and common mistake investigation result is kept in the careful system in electronics school.
In system was examined in electronics of the present invention school, Project design mistake investigation system and the Project design workflow management operation that combines was closely reminded automatically in the design cycle management and is investigated, and compulsory execution investigation system.
Concrete operation (referring to Fig. 2) is when to be the designer after design objective is accomplished with paper document submit check and correction to; In management software, also to make corresponding submit operation; Automatically corresponding corresponding common mistake content in software; Require the designer to investigate one by one and check, confirm that the common mistake that is provided with in the common fault library does not exist, and just can submit to the press corrector.Thereby, just carried out for the first time effectively investigation in the link that the designer checks oneself.
For press corrector and auditor, at the check and correction drawing, when filling in the document examination of electronics school, system also can remind the school to examine personnel automatically, and the common mistake that the designer has investigated is checked, and after check is passed through, just can submit to next stage to examine link.It is obstructed out-of-date to check, and can remind the designer to revise, and system gathers these records (promptly all mistake investigation results) automatically.If any a plurality of press correctors or auditor, these a plurality of press correctors and auditor all need carry out common mistake investigation.
Claims (7)
1. the mistake arrange distinguish method in the system is examined in an electronics school; It is characterized in that: before the related personnel submits electronic drawing or suggestion through said electronics school in the careful system; Said electronics school is examined system's mandatory requirement said electronic drawing is carried out common mistake investigation, and common mistake investigation result is kept in the careful system in said electronics school.
2. mistake arrange distinguish method as claimed in claim 1 is characterized in that: also be included in before said electronics school examines system and submit said electronic drawing or suggestion to, the said related personnel of system alert carries out common mistake investigation.
3. mistake arrange distinguish method as claimed in claim 1 is characterized in that: said electronics school is examined in the system and is preserved a common fault library, is used to supply said related personnel to check investigation one by one.
4. mistake arrange distinguish method as claimed in claim 3 is characterized in that: the content in the said common fault library is divided into must investigation content and optional investigation content two kinds.
5. mistake arrange distinguish method as claimed in claim 4 is characterized in that: said common fault library is provided with when examining system initialization in said electronics school, in system's operational process, safeguards and revise the content of said common fault library.
6. like each described mistake arrange distinguish method in the claim 1 to 5, it is characterized in that: said electronics school is examined in the system, and said related personnel comprises the designer, press corrector, auditor and authorizing officer.
7. mistake arrange distinguish method as claimed in claim 6 is characterized in that: said electronics school is examined system and is gathered all mistake investigation results automatically.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN2011104094714A CN102521696A (en) | 2011-12-09 | 2011-12-09 | Method for screening errors in electronic proofreading system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN2011104094714A CN102521696A (en) | 2011-12-09 | 2011-12-09 | Method for screening errors in electronic proofreading system |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN102521696A true CN102521696A (en) | 2012-06-27 |
Family
ID=46292607
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN2011104094714A Pending CN102521696A (en) | 2011-12-09 | 2011-12-09 | Method for screening errors in electronic proofreading system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN102521696A (en) |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102222118A (en) * | 2011-07-25 | 2011-10-19 | 江苏现代造船技术有限公司 | Method for establishing ship detailed design drawing database |
| CN102236842A (en) * | 2011-06-30 | 2011-11-09 | 内蒙古电力勘测设计院 | Method and system for archiving finished products during electric power design |
-
2011
- 2011-12-09 CN CN2011104094714A patent/CN102521696A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102236842A (en) * | 2011-06-30 | 2011-11-09 | 内蒙古电力勘测设计院 | Method and system for archiving finished products during electric power design |
| CN102222118A (en) * | 2011-07-25 | 2011-10-19 | 江苏现代造船技术有限公司 | Method for establishing ship detailed design drawing database |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| 张树森: "勘测设计一体化平台系统的图形校审设计与实现", 《铁路计算机应用》 * |
| 田江: "设计流程管理系统之设计思想探析", 《有色金属设计》 * |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| WO2020233330A1 (en) | Batch testing method, apparatus, and computer-readable storage medium | |
| WO2021088400A1 (en) | Document review method, apparatus and system, device, and storage medium | |
| CN106489149A (en) | A kind of data mask method based on data mining and mass-rent and system | |
| CN102521446A (en) | Verification method of electronic drawings | |
| CN108985707B (en) | Method for rapidly judging authenticity of resume content | |
| CN107908550A (en) | A kind of software defect statistical processing methods and device | |
| CN103810092A (en) | Application system testing method and device | |
| JP2016105270A (en) | Lean product modeling system and method | |
| CN104281523A (en) | Demand testability analysis method and system | |
| Ashok et al. | Role of XBRL in promoting the integrated reporting in Indian scenario | |
| CN106293654A (en) | Java programming exercise question automatic judging method and system | |
| CN104615540A (en) | Code standard management system | |
| CN104850692B (en) | A kind of intelligent wiring design method for chip design | |
| García-Mireles | Environmental sustainability in software process improvement: a systematic mapping study | |
| CN102521696A (en) | Method for screening errors in electronic proofreading system | |
| US8239362B1 (en) | Using metadata fragments as authoritative manufacturing work instructions | |
| CN110533392A (en) | A kind of realization method and system confirming capital settlement attribution data unit | |
| Nöhrer et al. | Positive effects of utilizing relationships between inconsistencies for more effective inconsistency resolution (NIER track) | |
| CN102043708A (en) | Erp software test system | |
| US9275358B1 (en) | System, method, and computer program for automatically creating and submitting defect information associated with defects identified during a software development lifecycle to a defect tracking system | |
| Jiang et al. | A BIM-based code checking approach for green construction | |
| Thomas et al. | An innovative and automated solution for NERC PRC-027-1 compliance | |
| CN110807132A (en) | Enterprise project data management system | |
| Norziaton et al. | Ownership structure firms in Malaysia: Internal audit function and audit fees | |
| CN106251093A (en) | A kind of support checks and accepts the acceptance of work method that attribute dynamically configures |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| C02 | Deemed withdrawal of patent application after publication (patent law 2001) | ||
| WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20120627 |