CN102507895A - Fatigue life estimation method of cast steel joint with obvious defect in cast steel joints - Google Patents

Fatigue life estimation method of cast steel joint with obvious defect in cast steel joints Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN102507895A
CN102507895A CN2011103406225A CN201110340622A CN102507895A CN 102507895 A CN102507895 A CN 102507895A CN 2011103406225 A CN2011103406225 A CN 2011103406225A CN 201110340622 A CN201110340622 A CN 201110340622A CN 102507895 A CN102507895 A CN 102507895A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
cast steel
crack
steel node
node
formula
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN2011103406225A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
靳慧
莫建华
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Southeast University
Original Assignee
Southeast University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Southeast University filed Critical Southeast University
Priority to CN2011103406225A priority Critical patent/CN102507895A/en
Publication of CN102507895A publication Critical patent/CN102507895A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a fatigue life estimation method of a cast steel joint with an obvious defect in cast steel joints. The method comprises the following steps of; step 1, determining the original crack size a0 of the cast steel joint; step 2, determining the shape factor f of the original crack of a cast steel joint mould; step 3, determining the final crack size af of the cast steel joint mould; step 4, obtaining the fatigue crack propagation life N of the cast steel mould; and step 5, determining the fatigue life of the cast steel joint. According to the fatigue life estimation method of the cast steel joint with the obvious defect in the cast steel joints, basis is provided for the accurate calculation in a project, the application of the cast steel joint can be greatly promoted, and the appearance and the force of the structure can be improved.

Description

Be used for having in the cast steel node cast steel node fatigue life evaluation method of open defect
Technical field
The present invention provides the fatigue life evaluation method of cast steel node in a kind of civil engineering structure, also can be used for the life estimate of approximate material cast steel tie-point in other field.To the cast steel node under the band open defect situation, to estimating its fatigue lifetime.For open defect is arranged in the node, then be crackle, according to fracturing mechanics method estimation crack propagation life with the equivalence of intranodal casting flaw.
Background technology
Steel-casting is to become molten iron through the iron and steel high temperature melt, is poured into to shift to an earlier date in the ready-made mould, and the cooling back demoulding forms, and cast steel node is a kind of form of expression of steel-casting, is mainly used in the interface of steel construction in the field of civil engineering.Cast steel node adopts the casting technique cast to produce; Because the complicacy of technological process; To occur inevitably loosening, casting flaw such as slag inclusion, bubble, under Fatigue Load, these initial casting flaws have remarkable influence to the load-bearing capacity of cast steel node.Existing nondestructiving detecting means can carry out nondestructive examination to node easily; Site-directed quantitative provides the defect distribution and the size of intranodal; The present invention is divided into cast steel node the band open defect and is not with two kinds of situation of open defect according to result of detection, to estimating its fatigue lifetime.
For the cast steel node that has open defect, this moment materials used S-N (preliminary Fatigue Stress Amplitude life-span) curve to carry out the component fatigue life estimate inapplicable, must adopt other theory, defect influence is taken into account.Theory of Fracture Mechanics has been carried out fine elaboration and sufficient theoretical proof to the material internal crack propagation, and the estimation of fatigue life that is applied to the initial imperfection cast steel node is practicable.Integrated use fracturing mechanics method of the present invention; With all kinds of defective equivalences in the cast steel node is crackle; Through calculating the fitted shapes factor; Thickness according to fracture toughness of materials and place, defective place node is confirmed final crack size, calculates the crack Propagation life-span at last, confirms the fatigue lifetime of cast steel node.
Summary of the invention
Technical matters: the purpose of this invention is to provide a kind of fatigue life evaluation method that is used for having in the cast steel node cast steel node of open defect; Because cast steel node is formed by the casting technique casting; Can produce various casting flaws unavoidably in the production run; Therefore the present invention is directed to has open defect in the node, then carry out life estimate according to the fracturing mechanics method.
Technical scheme: for solving the problems of the technologies described above, the present invention proposes a kind of fatigue life evaluation method that is used for having in the cast steel node cast steel node of open defect, this method comprises the steps:
Step 1: confirm cast steel node initial crack size a 0:
If the defective in the cast steel node is detected by non-destructive detecting device, and this defective is independent, the original dimension a of the equivalent crackle of defective in the cast steel 0The same with the size of defective independent in the cast steel;
If defective is detected by non-destructive detecting device, and be intensive, the original dimension a of the equivalent crackle of defective in the cast steel 0Should be the same with intensive defect distribution area size in the cast steel node;
Step 2: the form factor f that confirms the initial crack of cast steel node model:
Set up the cast steel node model of a plurality of band initial cracks, the crack length in each model is different; Obtain the stress strength factor K under each initial crack length a through the finite element numerical method, the expression formula of K does
K = f ( a t ) σ π a Formula 9
In the formula: K is a stress intensity factor; A is an initial crack length; T is place, crackle place, the thickness of cast steel node; σ is a stress; F is a form factor, is the function about a;
Obtain the form factor f in the model that initial crack length is a by formula 9,, simulate the expression formula f (a) of form factor f about a according to the f value under the different initial crack length; And then can obtain the expression formula of stress intensity factor range Δ K:
ΔK ( a ) = f · Δσ · π · a
Wherein Δ σ is the peaked scope of first principal stress;
Step 3: the final crack size a that confirms the cast steel node model f:
Final crack size a fFracture toughness according to material is calculated:
a c = 1 π ( K Ic Fσ ) 2 Formula 10
In the formula: a cBe critical crack size; K IcBe the cast steel material fracture toughness; F is a form factor, and σ is a stress;
Getting 0.9t is the maximum crack length of allowing appearance, and t is a cracks node wall thickness, then compares critical crack size a cWith the size of the maximum crack length 0.9t that allows appearance, getting smaller value is final crack length a f
Initial crack is more and more longer, and when reaching the length of final crackle, cast steel node has just ruptured;
Step 4: the crack Propagation life-span N that obtains the cast steel node model:
Confirm and calculate three variable a by above step 0, a fAnd Δ K, the crack Propagation life-span, N was:
N = ∫ a 0 a f Da C ( Δ K ) m = ∫ a 0 a f Da C ( FΔ σ π a ) m Formula 11
C, m are respectively the cast steel material constants in the formula; Final crack length a f, σ is a stress, the original dimension a of the equivalent crackle of defective in the cast steel 0, f is a form factor, stress intensity factor range Δ K;
Step 5: confirm the fatigue lifetime of cast steel node:
The 4th crack Propagation life-span N that draws of step is the estimation of fatigue life value of cast steel node divided by safety coefficient n, and safety coefficient is chosen according to related specifications according to the significance level of cast steel node.
Preferably, defective described in the step 1 is a pore, or is mingled with.
Beneficial effect:
Cast steel node is aesthetic in appearance, reasonable stress, and it is as new engineering material and engineering structure pattern, and is more and more wider in Application in Civil Engineering.Cast steel node is formed by the casting technique casting, can produce various casting flaws unavoidably in the production run, and the life estimation method of the cast steel node of band defective does not also have at present, has limited the application of cast steel node.It is a kind of with the fatigue life evaluation method of defective by cast steel node that the present invention provides, and for the accurate Calculation in the engineering provides foundation, can promote the application of cast steel node greatly, improves the outward appearance of structure and stressed.
Description of drawings
Fig. 1 is the matched curve figure of f (a).
Embodiment
The present invention will be described below with reference to accompanying drawings.
A kind of fatigue life evaluation method that is used for having in the cast steel node cast steel node of open defect, it is characterized in that: this method comprises the steps:
Step 1: confirm cast steel node initial crack size a 0:
If the defective in the cast steel node is detected by non-destructive detecting device, and this defective is independent, the original dimension a of the equivalent crackle of defective in the cast steel 0The same with the size of defective independent in the cast steel;
If defective is detected by non-destructive detecting device, and be intensive, the original dimension a of the equivalent crackle of defective in the cast steel 0Should be the same with intensive defect distribution area size in the cast steel node;
Step 2: the form factor f that confirms the initial crack of cast steel node model:
Set up the cast steel node model of a plurality of band initial cracks, the crack length in each model is different; Obtain the stress strength factor K under each initial crack length a through the finite element numerical method, the expression formula of K does
K = f ( a t ) σ π a Formula 9
In the formula: K is a stress intensity factor; A is an initial crack length; T is place, crackle place, the thickness of cast steel node; σ is a stress; F is a form factor, is the function about a;
Obtain the form factor f in the model that initial crack length is a by formula 9,, simulate the expression formula f (a) of form factor f about a according to the f value under the different initial crack length; And then can obtain the expression formula of stress intensity factor range Δ K:
ΔK ( a ) = f · Δσ · π · a
Wherein Δ σ is the peaked scope of first principal stress;
Step 3: the final crack size a that confirms the cast steel node model f:
Final crack size a fFracture toughness according to material is calculated:
a c = 1 π ( K Ic Fσ ) 2 Formula 10
In the formula: a cBe critical crack size; K IcBe the cast steel material fracture toughness; F is a form factor, and σ is a stress;
Getting 0.9t is the maximum crack length of allowing appearance, and t is a cracks node wall thickness, then compares critical crack size a cWith the size of the maximum crack length 0.9t that allows appearance, getting smaller value is final crack length a f
Initial crack is more and more longer, and when reaching the length of final crackle, cast steel node has just ruptured;
Step 4: the crack Propagation life-span N that obtains the cast steel node model:
Confirm and calculate three variable a by above step 0, a fAnd Δ K, the crack Propagation life-span, N was:
N = ∫ a 0 a f Da C ( Δ K ) m = ∫ a 0 a f Da C ( FΔ σ π a ) m Formula 11
C, m are respectively the cast steel material constants in the formula; Final crack length a f, σ is a stress, the original dimension a of the equivalent crackle of defective in the cast steel 0, f is a form factor, stress intensity factor range Δ K;
Step 5: confirm the fatigue lifetime of cast steel node:
The 4th crack Propagation life-span N that draws of step is the estimation of fatigue life value of cast steel node divided by safety coefficient n, and safety coefficient is chosen according to related specifications according to the significance level of cast steel node.
Defective described in the step 1 is a pore, or is mingled with.
At first cast steel node is carried out nondestructive examination, according to result of detection cast steel node is divided into the band open defect and is not with two kinds of situation of open defect then through nondestructiving detecting means.
Open defect is arranged in the cast steel node
Its calculation procedure is following:
1, confirms initial crack size a 0:
Because defect kind is a lot, different in the node, there be also having of surface buried in inside, having single also has intensively, and when carrying out life estimate, it work as and quantizes to handle fibrous root according to the scope of all kinds of defectives, big young pathbreaker, and equivalence is quite big or small crackle.The position of at first equivalent crackle should be identical with defective locations, and according to defect shape, equivalent crackle can be divided into surface crack, embed crack and penetrated crack.If defective is bigger, be single, the original dimension a of equivalent crackle 0Should be suitable with the size of individual defect; If defective is less, be intensive, the original dimension a of equivalent crackle 0Should be suitable with the defect distribution area size.
2, confirm form factor f:
Set up the cast steel node model of a plurality of band initial cracks, the crack length in each model is different.Through each crack length a of numerical calculations such as finite element iUnder stress strength factor K i, K iExpression formula do
K = f ( a t ) σ πa - - - ( 9 )
In the formula: K is a stress intensity factor; A is a crack length; T is a thickness of slab; σ is a stress; F is a form factor, is the function about a.
Calculating crack length by formula (9) is a iModel in form factor f i, according to the f under the different crack lengths iValue simulates the expression formula f (a) of form factor f about a.And then can obtain the expression formula of stress intensity factor range Δ K:
Δ K I ( a ) = f · Δσ · π · a
Wherein Δ σ is the peaked scope of first principal stress.
3, confirm final crack size a f:
Final crack size a fCan calculate according to the fracture toughness of material:
a c = 1 π ( K Ic fσ ) 2 - - - ( 10 )
In the formula: a cBe critical crack size; K IcBe fracture toughness of materials; F is a form factor.
Because generally do not allow the existence of penetrated crack in the engineering, get 0.9t (t is a cracks node wall thickness) again, then compare a for allowing the maximum crack length of appearance cWith the size of 0.9t, getting smaller value is final crack length a f
4, calculate the crack Propagation life-span:
Confirm and calculate three variable a by above step 0, a fAnd Δ K, according to Theory of Fracture Mechanics, the crack Propagation life-span, N was:
N = ∫ a 0 a f da C ( ΔK ) m = ∫ a 0 a f da C ( fΔσ πa ) m - - - ( 11 )
C, m are material constants in the formula.
5, confirming of designed life:
Go on foot the crack Propagation life-span N that calculates is cast steel node divided by safety coefficient n estimation of fatigue life value with the 4th.
The cast steel node that open defect is arranged
The cast steel node that open defect arranged directly Material Used S-N curve is estimated fatigue lifetime, must the utilization Theory of Fracture Mechanics.The crackle initial length is designated as a 0, the crackle final lengths is designated as a f, stress intensity factor range is designated as Δ K, and crackle is from a 0Expand to a fFatigue lifetime be designated as N, then the calculating formula of life-span N is:
N = ∫ a 0 a f da C ( ΔK ) m - - - ( 5 )
C, m are material constant.
Solve following formula, need to confirm three variable a 0, a fAnd Δ K.
1. confirm initial crack size a 0:
Because defect kind is a lot, different in the node, there be also having of surface buried in inside, having single also has intensively, and when carrying out life estimate, it work as and quantizes to handle fibrous root according to the scope and big young pathbreaker of all kinds of defectives, and equivalence is quite big or small crackle.The position of at first equivalent crackle should be identical with defective locations, and according to defect shape, equivalent crackle can be divided into surface crack, embed crack and penetrated crack.If defective is bigger, be single, the original dimension a of equivalent crackle 0Should be suitable with the size of individual defect; If defective is less, be intensive, the original dimension a of equivalent crackle 0Should be suitable with the defect distribution area size.
2. confirm final crack size a f:
Final crack size a fCan calculate according to the fracture toughness of material:
a c = 1 π ( K Ic fσ ) 2 - - - ( 6 )
In the formula: a cBe critical crack size; K IcBe fracture toughness of materials; F is a form factor.
Because generally do not allow the existence of penetrated crack in the engineering, get 0.9t (t is a cracks node wall thickness) again, then compare a for allowing the maximum crack length of appearance cWith the size of 0.9t, getting smaller value is final crack length a f
3. calculating stress strength factor range delta K.
Set up the cast steel node model of a plurality of band initial cracks, the crack length in each model is different.Through each crack length a of numerical calculations such as finite element iUnder stress strength factor K i, K iExpression formula do
K = f ( a t ) σ πa - - - ( 7 )
In the formula: K is a stress intensity factor; A is a crack length; T is a thickness of slab; σ is a stress; F is a form factor, is the function about a.
Calculating crack length by formula (7) is a iModel in form factor f i, according to the f under the different crack lengths iValue simulates the expression formula f (a) (the matched curve figure of f (a) as accompanying drawing 1 shown in) of form factor f about a.And then can obtain the expression formula of stress intensity factor range Δ K:
Δ K I ( a ) = f · Δσ · π · a - - - ( 8 )
Wherein Δ σ is the peaked scope of first principal stress.
The above is merely preferred embodiments of the present invention; Protection scope of the present invention is not exceeded with above-mentioned embodiment; As long as the equivalence that those of ordinary skills do according to disclosed content is modified or changed, all should include in the protection domain of putting down in writing in claims.

Claims (2)

1. fatigue life evaluation method that is used for having in the cast steel node cast steel node of open defect, it is characterized in that: this method comprises the steps:
Step 1: confirm cast steel node initial crack size a 0:
If the defective in the cast steel node is detected by non-destructive detecting device, and this defective is independent, the original dimension a of the equivalent crackle of defective in the cast steel 0The same with the size of defective independent in the cast steel;
If defective is detected by non-destructive detecting device, and be intensive, the original dimension a of the equivalent crackle of defective in the cast steel 0Should be the same with intensive defect distribution area size in the cast steel node;
Step 2: the form factor f that confirms the initial crack of cast steel node model:
Set up the cast steel node model of a plurality of band initial cracks, the crack length in each model is different; Obtain the stress strength factor K under each initial crack length a through the finite element numerical method, the expression formula of K does
K = f ( a t ) σ π a Formula 9
In the formula: K is a stress intensity factor; A is an initial crack length; T is place, crackle place, the thickness of cast steel node; σ is a stress; F is a form factor, is the function about a;
Obtain the form factor f in the model that initial crack length is a by formula 9,, simulate the expression formula f (a) of form factor f about a according to the f value under the different initial crack length; And then can obtain the expression formula of stress intensity factor range Δ K:
ΔK ( a ) = f · Δσ · π · a
Wherein Δ σ is the peaked scope of first principal stress;
Step 3: the final crack size a that confirms the cast steel node model f:
Final crack size a fFracture toughness according to material is calculated:
a c = 1 π ( K Ic Fσ ) 2 Formula 10
In the formula: a cBe critical crack size; K IcBe the cast steel material fracture toughness; F is a form factor, and σ is a stress;
Getting 0.9t is the maximum crack length of allowing appearance, and t is a cracks node wall thickness, then compares critical crack size a cWith the size of the maximum crack length 0.9t that allows appearance, getting smaller value is final crack length a f
Initial crack is more and more longer, and when reaching the length of final crackle, cast steel node has just ruptured;
Step 4: the crack Propagation life-span N that obtains the cast steel node model:
Confirm and calculate three variable a by above step 0, a fAnd Δ K, the crack Propagation life-span, N was:
N = ∫ a 0 a f Da C ( Δ K ) m = ∫ a 0 a f Da C ( FΔ σ π a ) m Formula 11
C, m are respectively the cast steel material constants in the formula; Final crack length a f, σ is a stress, the original dimension a of the equivalent crackle of defective in the cast steel 0, f is a form factor, stress intensity factor range Δ K;
Step 5: confirm the fatigue lifetime of cast steel node:
The 4th crack Propagation life-span N that draws of step is the estimation of fatigue life value of cast steel node divided by safety coefficient n, and safety coefficient is chosen according to related specifications according to the significance level of cast steel node.
2. the fatigue life evaluation method that is used for having in the cast steel node cast steel node of open defect according to claim 1, it is characterized in that: defective described in the step 1 is a pore, or is mingled with.
CN2011103406225A 2011-11-01 2011-11-01 Fatigue life estimation method of cast steel joint with obvious defect in cast steel joints Pending CN102507895A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN2011103406225A CN102507895A (en) 2011-11-01 2011-11-01 Fatigue life estimation method of cast steel joint with obvious defect in cast steel joints

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN2011103406225A CN102507895A (en) 2011-11-01 2011-11-01 Fatigue life estimation method of cast steel joint with obvious defect in cast steel joints

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN102507895A true CN102507895A (en) 2012-06-20

Family

ID=46220001

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN2011103406225A Pending CN102507895A (en) 2011-11-01 2011-11-01 Fatigue life estimation method of cast steel joint with obvious defect in cast steel joints

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN102507895A (en)

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104807697A (en) * 2014-01-27 2015-07-29 中国石油天然气集团公司 Steel structure safe fracture toughness determination method and steel structure design safety checking method
CN106769823A (en) * 2017-01-13 2017-05-31 重庆交通大学 Method based on the damaged in-service drag-line residual life of Defect Equivalent treatment assessment oversheath
CN107677786A (en) * 2017-08-28 2018-02-09 西北工业大学 Cast steel shrinkage defect ranking method
CN108828069A (en) * 2018-06-19 2018-11-16 北京领示科技有限公司 A kind of key component fatigue life based on ultrasonic quantitative data determines longevity method
CN109142529A (en) * 2018-08-27 2019-01-04 佛山科学技术学院 A kind of high-strength titanium alloy electro-beam welding joint super high cycle fatigue life-span prediction method
CN109163990A (en) * 2018-08-28 2019-01-08 中国科学院金属研究所 A kind of measurement method of axially loaded high cycle fatigue crack initiating life
CN109740295A (en) * 2019-02-27 2019-05-10 南京市特种设备安全监督检验研究院 A kind of vibrative mechanism residual Life Calculation method with crack defect
CN109759737A (en) * 2019-01-29 2019-05-17 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 GIL aluminum alloy piping welding pipe safety assessment method containing gas hole defect
CN110763758A (en) * 2019-09-12 2020-02-07 中国航发北京航空材料研究院 Method for determining relation between defects and fatigue performance based on nondestructive testing
CN111611687A (en) * 2020-04-15 2020-09-01 岭东核电有限公司 Defect evaluation method and device for metal expansion joint and electronic equipment
CN111783243A (en) * 2020-06-18 2020-10-16 东南大学 Metal structure fatigue crack propagation life prediction method based on filtering algorithm
WO2021004501A1 (en) * 2019-07-11 2021-01-14 上海理工大学 Fatigue-strength-based structural full-field lightweight level quantitative evaluation method

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2002286606A (en) * 2001-03-26 2002-10-03 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Method of evaluating fatigue crack developing speed of steel product
CN102221473A (en) * 2010-04-14 2011-10-19 广州市特种机电设备检测研究院 Method for estimating remaining fatigue life of main metal structure of crane

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2002286606A (en) * 2001-03-26 2002-10-03 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Method of evaluating fatigue crack developing speed of steel product
CN102221473A (en) * 2010-04-14 2011-10-19 广州市特种机电设备检测研究院 Method for estimating remaining fatigue life of main metal structure of crane

Non-Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
HALDIMANN-STURM S.C.等: "Fatigue design of cast steel nodes in tubular bridge structures", 《INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE》 *
尹双增: "《断裂、损伤理论及应用》", 31 December 1992, 清华大学出版社 *
张康达 等: "《压力容器手册 下》", 31 August 1990, 劳动人事出版社 *
张鹏: "30t轴重货车转向架摇枕的疲劳寿命估算及断裂安全性评价", 《中国硕士学位论文全文数据库工程科技Ⅰ辑》 *
王和慧等: "回转窑液压挡轮的应力强度与疲劳断裂分析", 《机械强度》 *
白秉三: "《断裂力学》", 31 August 1992, 辽宁大学出版社 *
石理国等: "海上平台管节点疲劳性能研究", 《中国造船》 *

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104807697A (en) * 2014-01-27 2015-07-29 中国石油天然气集团公司 Steel structure safe fracture toughness determination method and steel structure design safety checking method
CN106769823A (en) * 2017-01-13 2017-05-31 重庆交通大学 Method based on the damaged in-service drag-line residual life of Defect Equivalent treatment assessment oversheath
CN107677786A (en) * 2017-08-28 2018-02-09 西北工业大学 Cast steel shrinkage defect ranking method
CN108828069A (en) * 2018-06-19 2018-11-16 北京领示科技有限公司 A kind of key component fatigue life based on ultrasonic quantitative data determines longevity method
CN109142529B (en) * 2018-08-27 2021-08-03 佛山科学技术学院 Method for predicting ultrahigh cycle fatigue life of high-strength titanium alloy electron beam welding joint
CN109142529A (en) * 2018-08-27 2019-01-04 佛山科学技术学院 A kind of high-strength titanium alloy electro-beam welding joint super high cycle fatigue life-span prediction method
CN109163990A (en) * 2018-08-28 2019-01-08 中国科学院金属研究所 A kind of measurement method of axially loaded high cycle fatigue crack initiating life
CN109759737A (en) * 2019-01-29 2019-05-17 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 GIL aluminum alloy piping welding pipe safety assessment method containing gas hole defect
CN109740295A (en) * 2019-02-27 2019-05-10 南京市特种设备安全监督检验研究院 A kind of vibrative mechanism residual Life Calculation method with crack defect
WO2021004501A1 (en) * 2019-07-11 2021-01-14 上海理工大学 Fatigue-strength-based structural full-field lightweight level quantitative evaluation method
CN110763758A (en) * 2019-09-12 2020-02-07 中国航发北京航空材料研究院 Method for determining relation between defects and fatigue performance based on nondestructive testing
CN111611687A (en) * 2020-04-15 2020-09-01 岭东核电有限公司 Defect evaluation method and device for metal expansion joint and electronic equipment
CN111611687B (en) * 2020-04-15 2023-12-01 岭东核电有限公司 Defect evaluation method and device for metal expansion joint and electronic equipment
CN111783243A (en) * 2020-06-18 2020-10-16 东南大学 Metal structure fatigue crack propagation life prediction method based on filtering algorithm
CN111783243B (en) * 2020-06-18 2021-02-26 东南大学 Metal structure fatigue crack propagation life prediction method based on filtering algorithm

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN102507895A (en) Fatigue life estimation method of cast steel joint with obvious defect in cast steel joints
Qian et al. Fatigue and residual strength of concrete-filled tubular X-joints with full capacity welds
Wu et al. Damage monitoring of masonry structure under in-situ uniaxial compression test using acoustic emission parameters
Zhang et al. A comparative study on five approaches to evaluate double-K fracture toughness parameters of concrete and size effect analysis
Cao et al. Damage mechanism of slab track under the coupling effects of train load and water
Guagliano et al. Experimental and numerical analysis of sub-surface cracks in railway wheels
Qiu et al. Dynamic behavior of a running crack crossing mortar-rock interface under impacting load
Wang et al. Effect of pitting degradation on ductile fracture initiation of steel butt-welded joints
Zhang et al. An experimental study on the lateral pressure of fresh concrete in formwork
CN109668782A (en) A method of measurement concrete initial fracture toughness
Cheng et al. Stringer longitudinal bending–induced fatigue failure of stringer-to-floor beam welded connections in orthotropic steel railway bridge decks
Schmitt et al. Damage mechanics analysis (Gurson model) and experimental verification of the behaviour of a crack in a weld-cladded component
Aygül et al. An investigation of distortion-induced fatigue cracking under variable amplitude loading using 3D crack propagation analysis
CN107923830B (en) Method for characterizing the cracking mechanism of a fracture surface of a material
Wang et al. Experimental study of interfacial adhesion performance of prefabricated UHPC-NC diagonal shear groove
CN102507896A (en) Fatigue lifetime estimation method of cast steel joint without open defects in cast steel joints
Zhang et al. Shear behaviours and roughness degeneration based on a quantified rock joint surface description
Wang et al. Effect of water absorption ratio on tensile strength of red sandstone and morphological analysis of fracture surfaces
Samadlou et al. Propagation pattern for a two-dimensional subsurface crack under a moving contact pressure
Huang et al. Experimental investigation on the concrete fracture process zone using electronic speckle pattern interferometry
CN106769392A (en) Test steel bridge deck and epoxy asphalt mixture are mated formation the method for interface cracking resistance
Monroe et al. Simulation of deformation and hot tear formation using a visco-plastic model with damage
Lim et al. Bond characteristics and transfer length of prestressing strand in pretensioned concrete structures
Liao et al. Fatigue resistance of rib-to-bimetallic steel deck welded joints in orthotropic steel bridge decks
Zhang et al. Experimental and numerical investigations into responses of buried R/C frames subjected to impulsive loadings

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
C02 Deemed withdrawal of patent application after publication (patent law 2001)
WD01 Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication

Application publication date: 20120620