CN102507895A - Fatigue life estimation method of cast steel joint with obvious defect in cast steel joints - Google Patents
Fatigue life estimation method of cast steel joint with obvious defect in cast steel joints Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN102507895A CN102507895A CN2011103406225A CN201110340622A CN102507895A CN 102507895 A CN102507895 A CN 102507895A CN 2011103406225 A CN2011103406225 A CN 2011103406225A CN 201110340622 A CN201110340622 A CN 201110340622A CN 102507895 A CN102507895 A CN 102507895A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- cast steel
- crack
- steel node
- node
- formula
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to a fatigue life estimation method of a cast steel joint with an obvious defect in cast steel joints. The method comprises the following steps of; step 1, determining the original crack size a0 of the cast steel joint; step 2, determining the shape factor f of the original crack of a cast steel joint mould; step 3, determining the final crack size af of the cast steel joint mould; step 4, obtaining the fatigue crack propagation life N of the cast steel mould; and step 5, determining the fatigue life of the cast steel joint. According to the fatigue life estimation method of the cast steel joint with the obvious defect in the cast steel joints, basis is provided for the accurate calculation in a project, the application of the cast steel joint can be greatly promoted, and the appearance and the force of the structure can be improved.
Description
Technical field
The present invention provides the fatigue life evaluation method of cast steel node in a kind of civil engineering structure, also can be used for the life estimate of approximate material cast steel tie-point in other field.To the cast steel node under the band open defect situation, to estimating its fatigue lifetime.For open defect is arranged in the node, then be crackle, according to fracturing mechanics method estimation crack propagation life with the equivalence of intranodal casting flaw.
Background technology
Steel-casting is to become molten iron through the iron and steel high temperature melt, is poured into to shift to an earlier date in the ready-made mould, and the cooling back demoulding forms, and cast steel node is a kind of form of expression of steel-casting, is mainly used in the interface of steel construction in the field of civil engineering.Cast steel node adopts the casting technique cast to produce; Because the complicacy of technological process; To occur inevitably loosening, casting flaw such as slag inclusion, bubble, under Fatigue Load, these initial casting flaws have remarkable influence to the load-bearing capacity of cast steel node.Existing nondestructiving detecting means can carry out nondestructive examination to node easily; Site-directed quantitative provides the defect distribution and the size of intranodal; The present invention is divided into cast steel node the band open defect and is not with two kinds of situation of open defect according to result of detection, to estimating its fatigue lifetime.
For the cast steel node that has open defect, this moment materials used S-N (preliminary Fatigue Stress Amplitude life-span) curve to carry out the component fatigue life estimate inapplicable, must adopt other theory, defect influence is taken into account.Theory of Fracture Mechanics has been carried out fine elaboration and sufficient theoretical proof to the material internal crack propagation, and the estimation of fatigue life that is applied to the initial imperfection cast steel node is practicable.Integrated use fracturing mechanics method of the present invention; With all kinds of defective equivalences in the cast steel node is crackle; Through calculating the fitted shapes factor; Thickness according to fracture toughness of materials and place, defective place node is confirmed final crack size, calculates the crack Propagation life-span at last, confirms the fatigue lifetime of cast steel node.
Summary of the invention
Technical matters: the purpose of this invention is to provide a kind of fatigue life evaluation method that is used for having in the cast steel node cast steel node of open defect; Because cast steel node is formed by the casting technique casting; Can produce various casting flaws unavoidably in the production run; Therefore the present invention is directed to has open defect in the node, then carry out life estimate according to the fracturing mechanics method.
Technical scheme: for solving the problems of the technologies described above, the present invention proposes a kind of fatigue life evaluation method that is used for having in the cast steel node cast steel node of open defect, this method comprises the steps:
Step 1: confirm cast steel node initial crack size a
0:
If the defective in the cast steel node is detected by non-destructive detecting device, and this defective is independent, the original dimension a of the equivalent crackle of defective in the cast steel
0The same with the size of defective independent in the cast steel;
If defective is detected by non-destructive detecting device, and be intensive, the original dimension a of the equivalent crackle of defective in the cast steel
0Should be the same with intensive defect distribution area size in the cast steel node;
Step 2: the form factor f that confirms the initial crack of cast steel node model:
Set up the cast steel node model of a plurality of band initial cracks, the crack length in each model is different; Obtain the stress strength factor K under each initial crack length a through the finite element numerical method, the expression formula of K does
In the formula: K is a stress intensity factor; A is an initial crack length; T is place, crackle place, the thickness of cast steel node; σ is a stress; F is a form factor, is the function about a;
Obtain the form factor f in the model that initial crack length is a by formula 9,, simulate the expression formula f (a) of form factor f about a according to the f value under the different initial crack length; And then can obtain the expression formula of stress intensity factor range Δ K:
Wherein Δ σ is the peaked scope of first principal stress;
Step 3: the final crack size a that confirms the cast steel node model
f:
Final crack size a
fFracture toughness according to material is calculated:
In the formula: a
cBe critical crack size; K
IcBe the cast steel material fracture toughness; F is a form factor, and σ is a stress;
Getting 0.9t is the maximum crack length of allowing appearance, and t is a cracks node wall thickness, then compares critical crack size a
cWith the size of the maximum crack length 0.9t that allows appearance, getting smaller value is final crack length a
f
Initial crack is more and more longer, and when reaching the length of final crackle, cast steel node has just ruptured;
Step 4: the crack Propagation life-span N that obtains the cast steel node model:
Confirm and calculate three variable a by above step
0, a
fAnd Δ K, the crack Propagation life-span, N was:
C, m are respectively the cast steel material constants in the formula; Final crack length a
f, σ is a stress, the original dimension a of the equivalent crackle of defective in the cast steel
0, f is a form factor, stress intensity factor range Δ K;
Step 5: confirm the fatigue lifetime of cast steel node:
The 4th crack Propagation life-span N that draws of step is the estimation of fatigue life value of cast steel node divided by safety coefficient n, and safety coefficient is chosen according to related specifications according to the significance level of cast steel node.
Preferably, defective described in the step 1 is a pore, or is mingled with.
Beneficial effect:
Cast steel node is aesthetic in appearance, reasonable stress, and it is as new engineering material and engineering structure pattern, and is more and more wider in Application in Civil Engineering.Cast steel node is formed by the casting technique casting, can produce various casting flaws unavoidably in the production run, and the life estimation method of the cast steel node of band defective does not also have at present, has limited the application of cast steel node.It is a kind of with the fatigue life evaluation method of defective by cast steel node that the present invention provides, and for the accurate Calculation in the engineering provides foundation, can promote the application of cast steel node greatly, improves the outward appearance of structure and stressed.
Description of drawings
Fig. 1 is the matched curve figure of f (a).
Embodiment
The present invention will be described below with reference to accompanying drawings.
A kind of fatigue life evaluation method that is used for having in the cast steel node cast steel node of open defect, it is characterized in that: this method comprises the steps:
Step 1: confirm cast steel node initial crack size a
0:
If the defective in the cast steel node is detected by non-destructive detecting device, and this defective is independent, the original dimension a of the equivalent crackle of defective in the cast steel
0The same with the size of defective independent in the cast steel;
If defective is detected by non-destructive detecting device, and be intensive, the original dimension a of the equivalent crackle of defective in the cast steel
0Should be the same with intensive defect distribution area size in the cast steel node;
Step 2: the form factor f that confirms the initial crack of cast steel node model:
Set up the cast steel node model of a plurality of band initial cracks, the crack length in each model is different; Obtain the stress strength factor K under each initial crack length a through the finite element numerical method, the expression formula of K does
In the formula: K is a stress intensity factor; A is an initial crack length; T is place, crackle place, the thickness of cast steel node; σ is a stress; F is a form factor, is the function about a;
Obtain the form factor f in the model that initial crack length is a by formula 9,, simulate the expression formula f (a) of form factor f about a according to the f value under the different initial crack length; And then can obtain the expression formula of stress intensity factor range Δ K:
Wherein Δ σ is the peaked scope of first principal stress;
Step 3: the final crack size a that confirms the cast steel node model
f:
Final crack size a
fFracture toughness according to material is calculated:
In the formula: a
cBe critical crack size; K
IcBe the cast steel material fracture toughness; F is a form factor, and σ is a stress;
Getting 0.9t is the maximum crack length of allowing appearance, and t is a cracks node wall thickness, then compares critical crack size a
cWith the size of the maximum crack length 0.9t that allows appearance, getting smaller value is final crack length a
f
Initial crack is more and more longer, and when reaching the length of final crackle, cast steel node has just ruptured;
Step 4: the crack Propagation life-span N that obtains the cast steel node model:
Confirm and calculate three variable a by above step
0, a
fAnd Δ K, the crack Propagation life-span, N was:
C, m are respectively the cast steel material constants in the formula; Final crack length a
f, σ is a stress, the original dimension a of the equivalent crackle of defective in the cast steel
0, f is a form factor, stress intensity factor range Δ K;
Step 5: confirm the fatigue lifetime of cast steel node:
The 4th crack Propagation life-span N that draws of step is the estimation of fatigue life value of cast steel node divided by safety coefficient n, and safety coefficient is chosen according to related specifications according to the significance level of cast steel node.
Defective described in the step 1 is a pore, or is mingled with.
At first cast steel node is carried out nondestructive examination, according to result of detection cast steel node is divided into the band open defect and is not with two kinds of situation of open defect then through nondestructiving detecting means.
Open defect is arranged in the cast steel node
Its calculation procedure is following:
1, confirms initial crack size a
0:
Because defect kind is a lot, different in the node, there be also having of surface buried in inside, having single also has intensively, and when carrying out life estimate, it work as and quantizes to handle fibrous root according to the scope of all kinds of defectives, big young pathbreaker, and equivalence is quite big or small crackle.The position of at first equivalent crackle should be identical with defective locations, and according to defect shape, equivalent crackle can be divided into surface crack, embed crack and penetrated crack.If defective is bigger, be single, the original dimension a of equivalent crackle
0Should be suitable with the size of individual defect; If defective is less, be intensive, the original dimension a of equivalent crackle
0Should be suitable with the defect distribution area size.
2, confirm form factor f:
Set up the cast steel node model of a plurality of band initial cracks, the crack length in each model is different.Through each crack length a of numerical calculations such as finite element
iUnder stress strength factor K
i, K
iExpression formula do
In the formula: K is a stress intensity factor; A is a crack length; T is a thickness of slab; σ is a stress; F is a form factor, is the function about a.
Calculating crack length by formula (9) is a
iModel in form factor f
i, according to the f under the different crack lengths
iValue simulates the expression formula f (a) of form factor f about a.And then can obtain the expression formula of stress intensity factor range Δ K:
Wherein Δ σ is the peaked scope of first principal stress.
3, confirm final crack size a
f:
Final crack size a
fCan calculate according to the fracture toughness of material:
In the formula: a
cBe critical crack size; K
IcBe fracture toughness of materials; F is a form factor.
Because generally do not allow the existence of penetrated crack in the engineering, get 0.9t (t is a cracks node wall thickness) again, then compare a for allowing the maximum crack length of appearance
cWith the size of 0.9t, getting smaller value is final crack length a
f
4, calculate the crack Propagation life-span:
Confirm and calculate three variable a by above step
0, a
fAnd Δ K, according to Theory of Fracture Mechanics, the crack Propagation life-span, N was:
C, m are material constants in the formula.
5, confirming of designed life:
Go on foot the crack Propagation life-span N that calculates is cast steel node divided by safety coefficient n estimation of fatigue life value with the 4th.
The cast steel node that open defect is arranged
The cast steel node that open defect arranged directly Material Used S-N curve is estimated fatigue lifetime, must the utilization Theory of Fracture Mechanics.The crackle initial length is designated as a
0, the crackle final lengths is designated as a
f, stress intensity factor range is designated as Δ K, and crackle is from a
0Expand to a
fFatigue lifetime be designated as N, then the calculating formula of life-span N is:
C, m are material constant.
Solve following formula, need to confirm three variable a
0, a
fAnd Δ K.
1. confirm initial crack size a
0:
Because defect kind is a lot, different in the node, there be also having of surface buried in inside, having single also has intensively, and when carrying out life estimate, it work as and quantizes to handle fibrous root according to the scope and big young pathbreaker of all kinds of defectives, and equivalence is quite big or small crackle.The position of at first equivalent crackle should be identical with defective locations, and according to defect shape, equivalent crackle can be divided into surface crack, embed crack and penetrated crack.If defective is bigger, be single, the original dimension a of equivalent crackle
0Should be suitable with the size of individual defect; If defective is less, be intensive, the original dimension a of equivalent crackle
0Should be suitable with the defect distribution area size.
2. confirm final crack size a
f:
Final crack size a
fCan calculate according to the fracture toughness of material:
In the formula: a
cBe critical crack size; K
IcBe fracture toughness of materials; F is a form factor.
Because generally do not allow the existence of penetrated crack in the engineering, get 0.9t (t is a cracks node wall thickness) again, then compare a for allowing the maximum crack length of appearance
cWith the size of 0.9t, getting smaller value is final crack length a
f
3. calculating stress strength factor range delta K.
Set up the cast steel node model of a plurality of band initial cracks, the crack length in each model is different.Through each crack length a of numerical calculations such as finite element
iUnder stress strength factor K
i, K
iExpression formula do
In the formula: K is a stress intensity factor; A is a crack length; T is a thickness of slab; σ is a stress; F is a form factor, is the function about a.
Calculating crack length by formula (7) is a
iModel in form factor f
i, according to the f under the different crack lengths
iValue simulates the expression formula f (a) (the matched curve figure of f (a) as accompanying drawing 1 shown in) of form factor f about a.And then can obtain the expression formula of stress intensity factor range Δ K:
Wherein Δ σ is the peaked scope of first principal stress.
The above is merely preferred embodiments of the present invention; Protection scope of the present invention is not exceeded with above-mentioned embodiment; As long as the equivalence that those of ordinary skills do according to disclosed content is modified or changed, all should include in the protection domain of putting down in writing in claims.
Claims (2)
1. fatigue life evaluation method that is used for having in the cast steel node cast steel node of open defect, it is characterized in that: this method comprises the steps:
Step 1: confirm cast steel node initial crack size a
0:
If the defective in the cast steel node is detected by non-destructive detecting device, and this defective is independent, the original dimension a of the equivalent crackle of defective in the cast steel
0The same with the size of defective independent in the cast steel;
If defective is detected by non-destructive detecting device, and be intensive, the original dimension a of the equivalent crackle of defective in the cast steel
0Should be the same with intensive defect distribution area size in the cast steel node;
Step 2: the form factor f that confirms the initial crack of cast steel node model:
Set up the cast steel node model of a plurality of band initial cracks, the crack length in each model is different; Obtain the stress strength factor K under each initial crack length a through the finite element numerical method, the expression formula of K does
In the formula: K is a stress intensity factor; A is an initial crack length; T is place, crackle place, the thickness of cast steel node; σ is a stress; F is a form factor, is the function about a;
Obtain the form factor f in the model that initial crack length is a by formula 9,, simulate the expression formula f (a) of form factor f about a according to the f value under the different initial crack length; And then can obtain the expression formula of stress intensity factor range Δ K:
Wherein Δ σ is the peaked scope of first principal stress;
Step 3: the final crack size a that confirms the cast steel node model
f:
Final crack size a
fFracture toughness according to material is calculated:
In the formula: a
cBe critical crack size; K
IcBe the cast steel material fracture toughness; F is a form factor, and σ is a stress;
Getting 0.9t is the maximum crack length of allowing appearance, and t is a cracks node wall thickness, then compares critical crack size a
cWith the size of the maximum crack length 0.9t that allows appearance, getting smaller value is final crack length a
f
Initial crack is more and more longer, and when reaching the length of final crackle, cast steel node has just ruptured;
Step 4: the crack Propagation life-span N that obtains the cast steel node model:
Confirm and calculate three variable a by above step
0, a
fAnd Δ K, the crack Propagation life-span, N was:
C, m are respectively the cast steel material constants in the formula; Final crack length a
f, σ is a stress, the original dimension a of the equivalent crackle of defective in the cast steel
0, f is a form factor, stress intensity factor range Δ K;
Step 5: confirm the fatigue lifetime of cast steel node:
The 4th crack Propagation life-span N that draws of step is the estimation of fatigue life value of cast steel node divided by safety coefficient n, and safety coefficient is chosen according to related specifications according to the significance level of cast steel node.
2. the fatigue life evaluation method that is used for having in the cast steel node cast steel node of open defect according to claim 1, it is characterized in that: defective described in the step 1 is a pore, or is mingled with.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN2011103406225A CN102507895A (en) | 2011-11-01 | 2011-11-01 | Fatigue life estimation method of cast steel joint with obvious defect in cast steel joints |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN2011103406225A CN102507895A (en) | 2011-11-01 | 2011-11-01 | Fatigue life estimation method of cast steel joint with obvious defect in cast steel joints |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN102507895A true CN102507895A (en) | 2012-06-20 |
Family
ID=46220001
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN2011103406225A Pending CN102507895A (en) | 2011-11-01 | 2011-11-01 | Fatigue life estimation method of cast steel joint with obvious defect in cast steel joints |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN102507895A (en) |
Cited By (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104807697A (en) * | 2014-01-27 | 2015-07-29 | 中国石油天然气集团公司 | Steel structure safe fracture toughness determination method and steel structure design safety checking method |
CN106769823A (en) * | 2017-01-13 | 2017-05-31 | 重庆交通大学 | Method based on the damaged in-service drag-line residual life of Defect Equivalent treatment assessment oversheath |
CN107677786A (en) * | 2017-08-28 | 2018-02-09 | 西北工业大学 | Cast steel shrinkage defect ranking method |
CN108828069A (en) * | 2018-06-19 | 2018-11-16 | 北京领示科技有限公司 | A kind of key component fatigue life based on ultrasonic quantitative data determines longevity method |
CN109142529A (en) * | 2018-08-27 | 2019-01-04 | 佛山科学技术学院 | A kind of high-strength titanium alloy electro-beam welding joint super high cycle fatigue life-span prediction method |
CN109163990A (en) * | 2018-08-28 | 2019-01-08 | 中国科学院金属研究所 | A kind of measurement method of axially loaded high cycle fatigue crack initiating life |
CN109740295A (en) * | 2019-02-27 | 2019-05-10 | 南京市特种设备安全监督检验研究院 | A kind of vibrative mechanism residual Life Calculation method with crack defect |
CN109759737A (en) * | 2019-01-29 | 2019-05-17 | 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 | GIL aluminum alloy piping welding pipe safety assessment method containing gas hole defect |
CN110763758A (en) * | 2019-09-12 | 2020-02-07 | 中国航发北京航空材料研究院 | Method for determining relation between defects and fatigue performance based on nondestructive testing |
CN111611687A (en) * | 2020-04-15 | 2020-09-01 | 岭东核电有限公司 | Defect evaluation method and device for metal expansion joint and electronic equipment |
CN111783243A (en) * | 2020-06-18 | 2020-10-16 | 东南大学 | Metal structure fatigue crack propagation life prediction method based on filtering algorithm |
WO2021004501A1 (en) * | 2019-07-11 | 2021-01-14 | 上海理工大学 | Fatigue-strength-based structural full-field lightweight level quantitative evaluation method |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2002286606A (en) * | 2001-03-26 | 2002-10-03 | Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd | Method of evaluating fatigue crack developing speed of steel product |
CN102221473A (en) * | 2010-04-14 | 2011-10-19 | 广州市特种机电设备检测研究院 | Method for estimating remaining fatigue life of main metal structure of crane |
-
2011
- 2011-11-01 CN CN2011103406225A patent/CN102507895A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2002286606A (en) * | 2001-03-26 | 2002-10-03 | Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd | Method of evaluating fatigue crack developing speed of steel product |
CN102221473A (en) * | 2010-04-14 | 2011-10-19 | 广州市特种机电设备检测研究院 | Method for estimating remaining fatigue life of main metal structure of crane |
Non-Patent Citations (7)
Title |
---|
HALDIMANN-STURM S.C.等: "Fatigue design of cast steel nodes in tubular bridge structures", 《INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE》 * |
尹双增: "《断裂、损伤理论及应用》", 31 December 1992, 清华大学出版社 * |
张康达 等: "《压力容器手册 下》", 31 August 1990, 劳动人事出版社 * |
张鹏: "30t轴重货车转向架摇枕的疲劳寿命估算及断裂安全性评价", 《中国硕士学位论文全文数据库工程科技Ⅰ辑》 * |
王和慧等: "回转窑液压挡轮的应力强度与疲劳断裂分析", 《机械强度》 * |
白秉三: "《断裂力学》", 31 August 1992, 辽宁大学出版社 * |
石理国等: "海上平台管节点疲劳性能研究", 《中国造船》 * |
Cited By (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104807697A (en) * | 2014-01-27 | 2015-07-29 | 中国石油天然气集团公司 | Steel structure safe fracture toughness determination method and steel structure design safety checking method |
CN106769823A (en) * | 2017-01-13 | 2017-05-31 | 重庆交通大学 | Method based on the damaged in-service drag-line residual life of Defect Equivalent treatment assessment oversheath |
CN107677786A (en) * | 2017-08-28 | 2018-02-09 | 西北工业大学 | Cast steel shrinkage defect ranking method |
CN108828069A (en) * | 2018-06-19 | 2018-11-16 | 北京领示科技有限公司 | A kind of key component fatigue life based on ultrasonic quantitative data determines longevity method |
CN109142529B (en) * | 2018-08-27 | 2021-08-03 | 佛山科学技术学院 | Method for predicting ultrahigh cycle fatigue life of high-strength titanium alloy electron beam welding joint |
CN109142529A (en) * | 2018-08-27 | 2019-01-04 | 佛山科学技术学院 | A kind of high-strength titanium alloy electro-beam welding joint super high cycle fatigue life-span prediction method |
CN109163990A (en) * | 2018-08-28 | 2019-01-08 | 中国科学院金属研究所 | A kind of measurement method of axially loaded high cycle fatigue crack initiating life |
CN109759737A (en) * | 2019-01-29 | 2019-05-17 | 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 | GIL aluminum alloy piping welding pipe safety assessment method containing gas hole defect |
CN109740295A (en) * | 2019-02-27 | 2019-05-10 | 南京市特种设备安全监督检验研究院 | A kind of vibrative mechanism residual Life Calculation method with crack defect |
WO2021004501A1 (en) * | 2019-07-11 | 2021-01-14 | 上海理工大学 | Fatigue-strength-based structural full-field lightweight level quantitative evaluation method |
CN110763758A (en) * | 2019-09-12 | 2020-02-07 | 中国航发北京航空材料研究院 | Method for determining relation between defects and fatigue performance based on nondestructive testing |
CN111611687A (en) * | 2020-04-15 | 2020-09-01 | 岭东核电有限公司 | Defect evaluation method and device for metal expansion joint and electronic equipment |
CN111611687B (en) * | 2020-04-15 | 2023-12-01 | 岭东核电有限公司 | Defect evaluation method and device for metal expansion joint and electronic equipment |
CN111783243A (en) * | 2020-06-18 | 2020-10-16 | 东南大学 | Metal structure fatigue crack propagation life prediction method based on filtering algorithm |
CN111783243B (en) * | 2020-06-18 | 2021-02-26 | 东南大学 | Metal structure fatigue crack propagation life prediction method based on filtering algorithm |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN102507895A (en) | Fatigue life estimation method of cast steel joint with obvious defect in cast steel joints | |
Qian et al. | Fatigue and residual strength of concrete-filled tubular X-joints with full capacity welds | |
Wu et al. | Damage monitoring of masonry structure under in-situ uniaxial compression test using acoustic emission parameters | |
Zhang et al. | A comparative study on five approaches to evaluate double-K fracture toughness parameters of concrete and size effect analysis | |
Cao et al. | Damage mechanism of slab track under the coupling effects of train load and water | |
Guagliano et al. | Experimental and numerical analysis of sub-surface cracks in railway wheels | |
Qiu et al. | Dynamic behavior of a running crack crossing mortar-rock interface under impacting load | |
Wang et al. | Effect of pitting degradation on ductile fracture initiation of steel butt-welded joints | |
Zhang et al. | An experimental study on the lateral pressure of fresh concrete in formwork | |
CN109668782A (en) | A method of measurement concrete initial fracture toughness | |
Cheng et al. | Stringer longitudinal bending–induced fatigue failure of stringer-to-floor beam welded connections in orthotropic steel railway bridge decks | |
Schmitt et al. | Damage mechanics analysis (Gurson model) and experimental verification of the behaviour of a crack in a weld-cladded component | |
Aygül et al. | An investigation of distortion-induced fatigue cracking under variable amplitude loading using 3D crack propagation analysis | |
CN107923830B (en) | Method for characterizing the cracking mechanism of a fracture surface of a material | |
Wang et al. | Experimental study of interfacial adhesion performance of prefabricated UHPC-NC diagonal shear groove | |
CN102507896A (en) | Fatigue lifetime estimation method of cast steel joint without open defects in cast steel joints | |
Zhang et al. | Shear behaviours and roughness degeneration based on a quantified rock joint surface description | |
Wang et al. | Effect of water absorption ratio on tensile strength of red sandstone and morphological analysis of fracture surfaces | |
Samadlou et al. | Propagation pattern for a two-dimensional subsurface crack under a moving contact pressure | |
Huang et al. | Experimental investigation on the concrete fracture process zone using electronic speckle pattern interferometry | |
CN106769392A (en) | Test steel bridge deck and epoxy asphalt mixture are mated formation the method for interface cracking resistance | |
Monroe et al. | Simulation of deformation and hot tear formation using a visco-plastic model with damage | |
Lim et al. | Bond characteristics and transfer length of prestressing strand in pretensioned concrete structures | |
Liao et al. | Fatigue resistance of rib-to-bimetallic steel deck welded joints in orthotropic steel bridge decks | |
Zhang et al. | Experimental and numerical investigations into responses of buried R/C frames subjected to impulsive loadings |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
C02 | Deemed withdrawal of patent application after publication (patent law 2001) | ||
WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20120620 |