CN102279421A - Slope rock mass stability evaluation method - Google Patents
Slope rock mass stability evaluation method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN102279421A CN102279421A CN 201110120594 CN201110120594A CN102279421A CN 102279421 A CN102279421 A CN 102279421A CN 201110120594 CN201110120594 CN 201110120594 CN 201110120594 A CN201110120594 A CN 201110120594A CN 102279421 A CN102279421 A CN 102279421A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- sigma
- rho
- rock mass
- formula
- cell cube
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Abstract
As for a composite underground and surface exploitation mode, according to a spatial corresponding relation of a mining area, one part of two mining influence domains is mutually overlapped, which cause interaction and mutual superposition of a mining effect so that a composite dynamic system can be formed. Therefore, a slope rock mass deformation mechanism is more complex. The underground exploitation has three effects on the overlying rock mass in the influence domain. The effects comprises: a stratum change of an overlying rock stratum; integral intensity reduction; an influence of a stress field change in the domain. The third effect is generated because underground excavation changes the stress distribution of the original rock. In the influence domain, a stress value and a property in different space positions are different. Damages to the overlying rock mass caused by the underground excavation are divisional. The stress change divisional property can generate different change processes along with the subsequent excavation. The change processes can directly influence a stable state of the slope rock mass which means the stable state of the slope rock mass can be restricted or changed by an occurrence condition of the stress. Therefore, the above main influence factor should be taken into consideration during analyzing the stability of the slope rock mass. However, when processing such problems in the past, an analysis method under the influence of single open mining is approximately applied so that there are certain differences existing between a result and a reality. In the invention, a slope rock mass stability evaluation method is deduced based on the theoretical analysis so as to provide a scientific basis for a subsequent mining design of this kind of mines and safety productions.
Description
This method not only is suitable for the evaluation of the slope stability under the underground and open-air compound mining conditions, equally also is applicable to the evaluation of underground mining to slope, mountain area, hills body, railway bed stability; Can before exploitation, carry out necessary checking computations like this, to avoid or to reduce the economic loss that causes thus.
Background technology
Under underground and open-air compound mining influence, owing to the part in two kinds of mining influence territories comprises mutually, cause between them disturbance mutually, mutual superposition between the change of stress field process and homeostasis process, the essence variation has taken place in the initial stress of slope rock mass on the diverse location of space, and the variation of the slope rock mass stress field result of this two kinds of mining influence combined factors stack just, if ignore a certain influence factor, net result will there is some difference with actual conditions; Thereby have influence on the authenticity of theoretical evaluation.Thereby, need carry out the perfect of necessity to the relevant calculation method to the problems such as safety evaluatio under this type of mining condition, thereby for determining that reasonably the stability of slope situation provides scientific basis.
Summary of the invention
As shown in Figure 1, under underground and open-air compound mining influence, slope rock mass is except that the influence that change produced of STRESS VARIATION that produced by oprn-work and various environmental engineering conditions; Because slope rock mass is positioned within the underground mining influence territory, so the mechanics condition in the slope rock mass also will be subjected to underground influence of adopting effect.Generally speaking, the effect that underground mining produces three aspects to the last overlying strata body in the domain of influence, the i.e. variation in the reduction of the variation of superincumbent stratum layer position, bulk strength and the domain of influence planted agent field of force.Wherein the latter is because underground excavation has changed the stress distribution of protolith.In its domain of influence, stress value on different spatial size all is different with condition, so underground excavation has subregion to the destruction of last overlying strata body, and this STRESS VARIATION subregion will produce different change procedures with follow-up excavation.This change procedure will directly influence the steady state (SS) of slope rock mass, and the tax of this stress is just deposited the situation restriction or changed the stable condition of side slope body.Therefore, in the stability analysis of slope rock mass, this major influence factors should be taken into account.In Fig. 1, get a block abcd, and appoint therein and get a cell cube (Fig. 2); Because in underground mining influence territory, the cell cube both sides produce unbalanced move horizontally and cell cube produces unbalanced sedimentation up and down, make to produce horizontal strain and vertically strain (Fig. 2) in the cell cube; Wherein undergroundly adopt caused horizontal stress and be:
In the formula, b is a displacement factor, and E is the rock mass elastic modulus, and W (ρ) is the sinking value in cell cube left side, and opposite side sinking value is W (ρ+Δ ρ).
The sedimentation of cell cube top and bottom is inconsistent and vertical stress that produce is:
In the formula, E is the rock mass elastic modulus, and W (z), W (z-Δ z) are the sinking value of cell cube top and bottom.
Generally under underground mining influence, the sinking value of arbitrfary point is on the different depth of ground:
In the formula, W
MaxFor being Z in the degree of depth
iMaximum sinking value on the plane, R
zFor being Z in the degree of depth
iMaximum effect radius on the plane, A are productive area.
As shown in Figure 2, the skid resistance of bar block:
The sliding force of bar block:
As shown in Figure 1, the skid resistance of potential gliding mass and sliding force are respectively:
The stability factor of potential gliding mass is:
In the formula, r is a rock mass unit weight, α
iBe the angle between cell cube base mid point normal and the gravity vertical, ε
iBe the horizontal strain value of arbitrfary point in the cell cube, ε
IjBe the vertical strain value of arbitrfary point in the cell cube, C,
E is respectively rock mass cohesiveness, angle of internal friction and elastic modulus.
(10) formula is the theoretical formula that slope stability is calculated under underground and the Subaerial comprehensive mining effect.Wherein
With
Can obtain according to following method.
Can derive following parameters by (5) formula:
(1) along the horizontal strain of any direction
(2) the sinking distribution coefficient of on the strike principal section and tendency principal section:
(3) inclination and distortion
(4) move horizontally
(5) curvature distortion
In the formula, L
x, L
yBe respectively the horizontal projection value of the exploitation length of on the strike and across strike, all the other symbols are identical with the front.
Horizontal strain along the derivative of any direction is:
Vertically strain to the derivative of the degree of depth is:
In the formula, β is the rock stratum angle of critical deformation.
Can calculate the stability factor of potential gliding mass on the arbitrary section according to (1)~(20) formula.
Derive as can be seen by above-mentioned theory, the degree of stability of slope rock mass is directly related with the relative tertiary location between the underground exploiting field, the stability factor that is to say side slope be sink, move horizontally, the function of horizontal distortion, inclination and curvature; And be positioned on the different spatial of overlying strata body on the underground exploiting field, above-mentioned distortion parameter size is consistent anything but; Meanwhile, these value of consult volume sizes also depend on the acting in conjunction of multiple factors such as coal winning method, roof control method, architectonic distribution situation, lithology power; This shows, if ignore or do not consider underground influence of adopting, obviously be imperfection or irrational.Other computing method of Slope Stability Evaluation equally also can add underground mining influence factor, and its derivation therewith roughly the same.
Description of drawings
Fig. 1 concerns synoptic diagram for the present invention is underground with the Subaerial comprehensive exploitation;
Fig. 2 is a stress schematic diagram of the present invention;
Embodiment
In underground mining influence territory, the cell cube both sides produce unbalanced move horizontally and cell cube produces unbalanced sedimentation up and down, make to produce horizontal strain and vertically strain in the cell cube; Wherein undergroundly adopt caused horizontal stress and be:
In the formula, b is a displacement factor, and E is the rock mass elastic modulus, and W (ρ) is the sinking value in cell cube left side, and opposite side sinking value is W (ρ+Δ ρ).
The sedimentation of cell cube top and bottom is inconsistent and vertical stress that produce is:
In the formula, E is the rock mass elastic modulus, and W (z), W (z-Δ z) are the sinking value of cell cube top and bottom.
Generally under underground mining influence, the sinking value of arbitrfary point is on the different depth of ground:
In the formula, W
MaxFor being Z in the degree of depth
iMaximum sinking value on the plane, R
zFor being Z in the degree of depth
iMaximum effect radius on the plane, A are productive area.
The skid resistance of bar block:
The sliding force of bar block:
The skid resistance and the sliding force of potential gliding mass are respectively:
The stability factor of potential gliding mass is:
In the formula, r is a rock mass unit weight, α
iBe the angle between cell cube base mid point normal and the gravity vertical, ε
iBe the horizontal strain value of arbitrfary point in the cell cube, ε
IjBe the vertical strain value of arbitrfary point in the cell cube, C,
E is respectively rock mass cohesiveness, angle of internal friction and elastic modulus.
(10) formula is the theoretical formula that slope stability is calculated under underground and the Subaerial comprehensive mining effect.Wherein
With
Can obtain according to following method.
Can derive following parameters by (5) formula:
(1) along the horizontal strain of any direction
(2) the sinking distribution coefficient of on the strike principal section and tendency principal section:
(3) inclination and distortion
(4) move horizontally
(15)
(5) curvature distortion
In the formula, L
x, L
yBe respectively the horizontal projection value of the exploitation length of on the strike and across strike, all the other symbols are identical with the front.
Horizontal strain along the derivative of any direction is:
Vertically strain to the derivative of the degree of depth is:
In the formula, β is the rock stratum angle of critical deformation.
Can calculate the stability factor of potential gliding mass on the arbitrary section according to (1)~(20) formula.
Claims (2)
1. slope rock mass method for estimating stability, be not only applicable to side slope rock stability evaluation under the underground and open-air compound mining influence, equally also be applicable to the evaluation of underground mining to slope, mountain area, hills body, railway bed stability, it mainly may further comprise the steps:
Get a block abcd, and appoint therein and get a cell cube; Because in underground mining influence territory, the cell cube both sides produce unbalanced move horizontally and cell cube produces unbalanced sedimentation up and down, make to produce horizontal strain and vertically strain in the cell cube; Wherein undergroundly adopt caused horizontal stress and be:
In the formula, b is a displacement factor, and E is the rock mass elastic modulus, and W (ρ) is the sinking value in cell cube left side, and opposite side sinking value is W (ρ+Δ ρ).
The sedimentation of cell cube top and bottom is inconsistent and vertical stress that produce is:
In the formula, E is the rock mass elastic modulus, and W (z), W (z-Δ z) are the sinking value of cell cube top and bottom.
Generally under underground mining influence, the sinking value of arbitrfary point is on the different depth of ground:
In the formula, W
MaxFor being Z in the degree of depth
tMaximum sinking value on the plane, R
zFor being Z in the degree of depth
iMaximum effect radius on the plane, A are productive area.
The skid resistance of bar block:
The sliding force of bar block:
The skid resistance and the sliding force of potential gliding mass are respectively:
The stability factor of potential gliding mass is:
In the formula, r is a rock mass unit weight, α
iBe the angle between cell cube base mid point normal and the gravity vertical, ε
iBe the horizontal strain value of arbitrfary point in the cell cube, ε
IjBe the vertical strain value of arbitrfary point in the cell cube, C,
E is respectively rock mass cohesiveness, angle of internal friction and elastic modulus.
(10) formula is the theoretical formula that slope stability is calculated under underground and the Subaerial comprehensive mining effect.Wherein
With
Can obtain according to following method.
Can derive following parameters by (5) formula:
(1) along the horizontal strain of any direction
(2) the sinking distribution coefficient of on the strike principal section and tendency principal section:
(3) inclination and distortion
(4) move horizontally
(5) curvature distortion
In the formula, L
x, L
yBe respectively the horizontal projection value of the exploitation length of on the strike and across strike, all the other symbols are identical with the front.
Horizontal strain along the derivative of any direction is:
Vertically strain to the derivative of the degree of depth is:
In the formula, β is the rock stratum angle of critical deformation.
2. the method for claim 1 is primarily characterized in that the derivation to formula 10,19,20.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN 201110120594 CN102279421A (en) | 2011-05-11 | 2011-05-11 | Slope rock mass stability evaluation method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN 201110120594 CN102279421A (en) | 2011-05-11 | 2011-05-11 | Slope rock mass stability evaluation method |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN102279421A true CN102279421A (en) | 2011-12-14 |
Family
ID=45104971
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN 201110120594 Pending CN102279421A (en) | 2011-05-11 | 2011-05-11 | Slope rock mass stability evaluation method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN102279421A (en) |
Cited By (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103077270A (en) * | 2012-12-31 | 2013-05-01 | 河海大学 | Method for determining highest risk surface of side slope |
CN103485353A (en) * | 2013-09-24 | 2014-01-01 | 昆明理工大学 | Slope stability analysis slice method based on global optimization |
CN103713332A (en) * | 2013-12-26 | 2014-04-09 | 广西华锡集团股份有限公司 | Method for determining jointed rock mass roadway axis strike |
CN103729521A (en) * | 2014-01-20 | 2014-04-16 | 湖北工业大学 | Slide face boundary method for calculating slope stability |
CN103728664A (en) * | 2013-12-24 | 2014-04-16 | 辽宁工程技术大学 | Analysis method for stability of strip mine side slope in earthquake |
CN104504461A (en) * | 2014-12-09 | 2015-04-08 | 鞍钢集团矿业公司 | Method for predicating mine pit slope deformation destroy induced by conversion from surface mining to underground mining |
CN105332381A (en) * | 2015-11-10 | 2016-02-17 | 长安大学 | Method for analyzing stability of ribbed slope |
CN106326528A (en) * | 2016-08-09 | 2017-01-11 | 鞍钢集团矿业有限公司 | Method for predicting distribution rule of ground surface fissures induced by underground mining of surface mine end slope |
CN106503354A (en) * | 2016-11-01 | 2017-03-15 | 中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所 | A kind of unsaturation soil property stable slope computed improved method |
CN108446450A (en) * | 2018-02-23 | 2018-08-24 | 煤炭工业济南设计研究院有限公司 | A kind of analysis calculation method of building destruction degree by mining influence |
CN109033662A (en) * | 2018-08-06 | 2018-12-18 | 重庆交通大学 | Bedding rock sloper based on deformation excavates method for analyzing stability |
CN110348125A (en) * | 2019-07-12 | 2019-10-18 | 西安科技大学 | A kind of visualization method of discrimination of block stability |
CN110633542A (en) * | 2019-06-18 | 2019-12-31 | 贵州正业工程技术投资有限公司 | Group tension action spherical crown type slope stability evaluation method based on simple plane sliding method |
CN110737945A (en) * | 2019-10-25 | 2020-01-31 | 中冶长天国际工程有限责任公司 | method and device for determining section parameters of three-arch roadway |
CN110847141A (en) * | 2019-11-26 | 2020-02-28 | 山西省交通规划勘察设计院有限公司 | Slope gliding thrust calculation method based on deep displacement deformation monitoring |
CN113642941A (en) * | 2021-10-14 | 2021-11-12 | 西南交通大学 | Slope safety state analysis method, device and equipment and readable storage medium |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2000096571A (en) * | 1998-09-18 | 2000-04-04 | Hokuryo Jrc Kogyo Kk | Slope face cover for shoulder |
CN101538861A (en) * | 2009-04-21 | 2009-09-23 | 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 | Highway slope stability grading evaluation method |
-
2011
- 2011-05-11 CN CN 201110120594 patent/CN102279421A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2000096571A (en) * | 1998-09-18 | 2000-04-04 | Hokuryo Jrc Kogyo Kk | Slope face cover for shoulder |
CN101538861A (en) * | 2009-04-21 | 2009-09-23 | 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 | Highway slope stability grading evaluation method |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
《工程地质学报》 19981231 孙世国等 地下与露天复合采动影响下边坡岩体稳定性评价方法的研究 312-318 1-2 第6卷, 第4期 * |
Cited By (29)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103077270B (en) * | 2012-12-31 | 2015-04-29 | 河海大学 | Method for determining highest risk surface of side slope |
CN103077270A (en) * | 2012-12-31 | 2013-05-01 | 河海大学 | Method for determining highest risk surface of side slope |
CN103485353A (en) * | 2013-09-24 | 2014-01-01 | 昆明理工大学 | Slope stability analysis slice method based on global optimization |
CN103485353B (en) * | 2013-09-24 | 2015-08-12 | 昆明理工大学 | Based on the Analysis of Slope Stability slice method of global optimization |
CN103728664A (en) * | 2013-12-24 | 2014-04-16 | 辽宁工程技术大学 | Analysis method for stability of strip mine side slope in earthquake |
CN103728664B (en) * | 2013-12-24 | 2016-04-13 | 辽宁工程技术大学 | The analytical approach of a kind of open-pit slope stability in earthquake |
CN103713332A (en) * | 2013-12-26 | 2014-04-09 | 广西华锡集团股份有限公司 | Method for determining jointed rock mass roadway axis strike |
CN103713332B (en) * | 2013-12-26 | 2016-06-15 | 广西华锡集团股份有限公司 | A kind of crack rock laneway axis moves towards defining method |
CN103729521B (en) * | 2014-01-20 | 2017-07-11 | 湖北工业大学 | The slide face boundary that a kind of slope stability is calculated |
CN103729521A (en) * | 2014-01-20 | 2014-04-16 | 湖北工业大学 | Slide face boundary method for calculating slope stability |
CN104504461A (en) * | 2014-12-09 | 2015-04-08 | 鞍钢集团矿业公司 | Method for predicating mine pit slope deformation destroy induced by conversion from surface mining to underground mining |
CN105332381B (en) * | 2015-11-10 | 2018-03-20 | 长安大学 | A kind of reinforced slope method for analyzing stability |
CN105332381A (en) * | 2015-11-10 | 2016-02-17 | 长安大学 | Method for analyzing stability of ribbed slope |
CN106326528A (en) * | 2016-08-09 | 2017-01-11 | 鞍钢集团矿业有限公司 | Method for predicting distribution rule of ground surface fissures induced by underground mining of surface mine end slope |
CN106503354B (en) * | 2016-11-01 | 2019-06-04 | 中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所 | A kind of unsaturation soil property stable slope computed improved method |
CN106503354A (en) * | 2016-11-01 | 2017-03-15 | 中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所 | A kind of unsaturation soil property stable slope computed improved method |
CN108446450A (en) * | 2018-02-23 | 2018-08-24 | 煤炭工业济南设计研究院有限公司 | A kind of analysis calculation method of building destruction degree by mining influence |
CN108446450B (en) * | 2018-02-23 | 2021-07-02 | 通用技术集团工程设计有限公司 | Method for analyzing and calculating damage degree of building influenced by mining |
CN109033662B (en) * | 2018-08-06 | 2022-05-10 | 重庆交通大学 | Bedding slope excavation stability analysis method based on deformation |
CN109033662A (en) * | 2018-08-06 | 2018-12-18 | 重庆交通大学 | Bedding rock sloper based on deformation excavates method for analyzing stability |
CN110633542A (en) * | 2019-06-18 | 2019-12-31 | 贵州正业工程技术投资有限公司 | Group tension action spherical crown type slope stability evaluation method based on simple plane sliding method |
CN110633542B (en) * | 2019-06-18 | 2021-01-15 | 贵州正业工程技术投资有限公司 | Method for evaluating stability of spherical crown type slope under action of group tension based on plane sliding method |
CN110348125A (en) * | 2019-07-12 | 2019-10-18 | 西安科技大学 | A kind of visualization method of discrimination of block stability |
CN110348125B (en) * | 2019-07-12 | 2022-12-02 | 西安科技大学 | Visual discrimination method for stability of block |
CN110737945A (en) * | 2019-10-25 | 2020-01-31 | 中冶长天国际工程有限责任公司 | method and device for determining section parameters of three-arch roadway |
CN110847141B (en) * | 2019-11-26 | 2021-09-24 | 山西省交通规划勘察设计院有限公司 | Slope gliding thrust calculation method based on deep displacement deformation monitoring |
CN110847141A (en) * | 2019-11-26 | 2020-02-28 | 山西省交通规划勘察设计院有限公司 | Slope gliding thrust calculation method based on deep displacement deformation monitoring |
CN113642941A (en) * | 2021-10-14 | 2021-11-12 | 西南交通大学 | Slope safety state analysis method, device and equipment and readable storage medium |
CN113642941B (en) * | 2021-10-14 | 2022-01-07 | 西南交通大学 | Slope safety state analysis method, device and equipment and readable storage medium |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN102279421A (en) | Slope rock mass stability evaluation method | |
Peng | Topical areas of research needs in ground control–a state of the art review on coal mine ground control | |
Marcak et al. | Seismic activation of tectonic stresses by mining | |
Wang et al. | Numerical investigation of the dynamic mechanical state of a coal pillar during longwall mining panel extraction | |
Sui et al. | Interactions of overburden failure zones due to multiple-seam mining using longwall caving | |
Gao et al. | Evaluation of coal longwall caving characteristics using an innovative UDEC Trigon approach | |
Khalymendyk et al. | The mechanism of roadway deformation in conditions of laminated rocks | |
Luo et al. | Geomechanical modeling of stresses adjacent to salt bodies: Part 1—Uncoupled models | |
Tang | Applications of rock failure process analysis (RFPA) method | |
Suchowerska et al. | Horizontal stress under supercritical longwall panels | |
Yan et al. | An innovative approach for gateroad layout in highly gassy longwall top coal caving | |
Konicek et al. | Long-term Czech experiences with rockbursts with applicability to today’s underground coal mines | |
Das et al. | Evaluation of the effect of fault on the stability of underground workings of coal mine through DEM and statistical analysis | |
Li et al. | Impact of longwall mining on groundwater above the longwall panel in shallow coal seams | |
Yang et al. | Experimental investigation into stress-relief characteristics with upward large height and upward mining under hard thick roof | |
Dehghan et al. | 3-D modeling of rock burst in pillar No. 19 of Fetr6 chromite mine | |
Wu et al. | Deformation characteristics and mechanism of deep subsize coal pillar of the tilted stratum | |
Han et al. | Surface subsidence prediction method for coal mines with ultrathick and hard stratum | |
Pang et al. | Double-factor control method for calculating hydraulic support working resistance for longwall mining with large mining height | |
Huang et al. | Lagged settlement in sandy cobble strata and earth pressure on shield tunnel | |
Sun et al. | Numerical investigation of gob-side entry retaining through precut overhanging hard roof to control rockburst | |
Klemetti et al. | Longwall gateroad yield pillar response and model verification–a case study | |
Miller et al. | Structural analysis of faults related to a heterogeneous stress history: reconstruction of a dismembered gold deposit, Stawell, western Lachlan Fold Belt, Australia | |
Guo et al. | Using the Schwarz alternating method to identify critical water-resistant thickness between tunnel and concealed cavity | |
Van Dyke et al. | Moderate cover bleeder entry and standing support performance in a longwall mine: a case study |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
C02 | Deemed withdrawal of patent application after publication (patent law 2001) | ||
WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20111214 |