CN102279421A - Slope rock mass stability evaluation method - Google Patents

Slope rock mass stability evaluation method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN102279421A
CN102279421A CN 201110120594 CN201110120594A CN102279421A CN 102279421 A CN102279421 A CN 102279421A CN 201110120594 CN201110120594 CN 201110120594 CN 201110120594 A CN201110120594 A CN 201110120594A CN 102279421 A CN102279421 A CN 102279421A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
sigma
rho
rock mass
formula
cell cube
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN 201110120594
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
孙世国
宋志飞
冯少杰
陈静
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
North China University of Technology
Original Assignee
North China University of Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by North China University of Technology filed Critical North China University of Technology
Priority to CN 201110120594 priority Critical patent/CN102279421A/en
Publication of CN102279421A publication Critical patent/CN102279421A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Abstract

As for a composite underground and surface exploitation mode, according to a spatial corresponding relation of a mining area, one part of two mining influence domains is mutually overlapped, which cause interaction and mutual superposition of a mining effect so that a composite dynamic system can be formed. Therefore, a slope rock mass deformation mechanism is more complex. The underground exploitation has three effects on the overlying rock mass in the influence domain. The effects comprises: a stratum change of an overlying rock stratum; integral intensity reduction; an influence of a stress field change in the domain. The third effect is generated because underground excavation changes the stress distribution of the original rock. In the influence domain, a stress value and a property in different space positions are different. Damages to the overlying rock mass caused by the underground excavation are divisional. The stress change divisional property can generate different change processes along with the subsequent excavation. The change processes can directly influence a stable state of the slope rock mass which means the stable state of the slope rock mass can be restricted or changed by an occurrence condition of the stress. Therefore, the above main influence factor should be taken into consideration during analyzing the stability of the slope rock mass. However, when processing such problems in the past, an analysis method under the influence of single open mining is approximately applied so that there are certain differences existing between a result and a reality. In the invention, a slope rock mass stability evaluation method is deduced based on the theoretical analysis so as to provide a scientific basis for a subsequent mining design of this kind of mines and safety productions.

Description

A kind of slope rock mass method for estimating stability
This method not only is suitable for the evaluation of the slope stability under the underground and open-air compound mining conditions, equally also is applicable to the evaluation of underground mining to slope, mountain area, hills body, railway bed stability; Can before exploitation, carry out necessary checking computations like this, to avoid or to reduce the economic loss that causes thus.
Background technology
Under underground and open-air compound mining influence, owing to the part in two kinds of mining influence territories comprises mutually, cause between them disturbance mutually, mutual superposition between the change of stress field process and homeostasis process, the essence variation has taken place in the initial stress of slope rock mass on the diverse location of space, and the variation of the slope rock mass stress field result of this two kinds of mining influence combined factors stack just, if ignore a certain influence factor, net result will there is some difference with actual conditions; Thereby have influence on the authenticity of theoretical evaluation.Thereby, need carry out the perfect of necessity to the relevant calculation method to the problems such as safety evaluatio under this type of mining condition, thereby for determining that reasonably the stability of slope situation provides scientific basis.
Summary of the invention
As shown in Figure 1, under underground and open-air compound mining influence, slope rock mass is except that the influence that change produced of STRESS VARIATION that produced by oprn-work and various environmental engineering conditions; Because slope rock mass is positioned within the underground mining influence territory, so the mechanics condition in the slope rock mass also will be subjected to underground influence of adopting effect.Generally speaking, the effect that underground mining produces three aspects to the last overlying strata body in the domain of influence, the i.e. variation in the reduction of the variation of superincumbent stratum layer position, bulk strength and the domain of influence planted agent field of force.Wherein the latter is because underground excavation has changed the stress distribution of protolith.In its domain of influence, stress value on different spatial size all is different with condition, so underground excavation has subregion to the destruction of last overlying strata body, and this STRESS VARIATION subregion will produce different change procedures with follow-up excavation.This change procedure will directly influence the steady state (SS) of slope rock mass, and the tax of this stress is just deposited the situation restriction or changed the stable condition of side slope body.Therefore, in the stability analysis of slope rock mass, this major influence factors should be taken into account.In Fig. 1, get a block abcd, and appoint therein and get a cell cube (Fig. 2); Because in underground mining influence territory, the cell cube both sides produce unbalanced move horizontally and cell cube produces unbalanced sedimentation up and down, make to produce horizontal strain and vertically strain (Fig. 2) in the cell cube; Wherein undergroundly adopt caused horizontal stress and be:
ϵ = 1 E ( σ - μσ j ) - - - ( 1 )
σ = E · ϵ = E · b d 2 W ( ρ ) d ρ 2 - - - ( 2 )
In the formula, b is a displacement factor, and E is the rock mass elastic modulus, and W (ρ) is the sinking value in cell cube left side, and opposite side sinking value is W (ρ+Δ ρ).
The sedimentation of cell cube top and bottom is inconsistent and vertical stress that produce is:
ϵ j = 1 E ( σ j - μσ ) - - - ( 3 )
σ j = E · ϵ = E dW ( z ) dz - - - ( 4 )
In the formula, E is the rock mass elastic modulus, and W (z), W (z-Δ z) are the sinking value of cell cube top and bottom.
Generally under underground mining influence, the sinking value of arbitrfary point is on the different depth of ground:
w ( x , y ) = W max R z ∫ ∫ e - π ( x 2 + y 2 ) dxdy Z i - - - ( 5 )
In the formula, W MaxFor being Z in the degree of depth iMaximum sinking value on the plane, R zFor being Z in the degree of depth iMaximum effect radius on the plane, A are productive area.
As shown in Figure 2, the skid resistance of bar block:
Figure BSA00000492903900026
The sliding force of bar block:
T Ii = Σ j = 1 m Δz ij Δρ i · r sin α i + Δρ i 1 m Σ j = 1 m σ ij sin α i + Σ j = 1 m Δz ij σ i cos α i - - - ( 7 )
As shown in Figure 1, the skid resistance of potential gliding mass and sliding force are respectively:
T I = Σ i = 1 n T i T i , = Σ i = 1 n T i , - - - ( 8 )
The stability factor of potential gliding mass is:
In the formula, r is a rock mass unit weight, α iBe the angle between cell cube base mid point normal and the gravity vertical, ε iBe the horizontal strain value of arbitrfary point in the cell cube, ε IjBe the vertical strain value of arbitrfary point in the cell cube, C,
Figure BSA00000492903900032
E is respectively rock mass cohesiveness, angle of internal friction and elastic modulus.
Because:
Figure BSA00000492903900033
Figure BSA00000492903900034
Then (9) formula is:
Figure BSA00000492903900035
(10) formula is the theoretical formula that slope stability is calculated under underground and the Subaerial comprehensive mining effect.Wherein
Figure BSA00000492903900036
With
Figure BSA00000492903900037
Can obtain according to following method.
Can derive following parameters by (5) formula:
(1) along the horizontal strain of any direction
Figure BSA00000492903900038
(2) the sinking distribution coefficient of on the strike principal section and tendency principal section:
c x = { [ erf ( π ‾ x R z ) + 1 ] - [ erf ( π ‾ ( x - L x ) / R z ) + 1 ] } / 2 - - - ( 12 )
c y = { [ erf ( π ‾ y R z ) + 1 ] - [ erf ( π ‾ ( y - L y ) / R z ) + 1 ] } / 2 - - - ( 13 )
(3) inclination and distortion
i x = w max R z [ e - π x 2 R z 2 - e - π ( x - L x ) 2 R z 2 ] , i y = w max R z [ e - π y 2 R z 2 - e - π ( y - L y ) 2 R z 2 ] - - - ( 14 )
(4) move horizontally
u x = bw max [ e - π x 2 R z 2 - e - π ( x - L x ) 2 R z 2 ] u y = bw max [ e - π y 2 R z 2 - e - π ( y - L y ) 2 R z 2 ] - - - ( 15 )
(5) curvature distortion
k x = - 2 π w max R z [ x R z e - π x 2 R z 2 - x - L x R z e - π ( x - L x ) 2 R z 2 ] (16)
k y = - 2 π w max R z [ y R z e - π y 2 R z 2 - y - L y R z e - π ( y - L y ) 2 R z 2 ]
In the formula, L x, L yBe respectively the horizontal projection value of the exploitation length of on the strike and across strike, all the other symbols are identical with the front.
Horizontal strain along the derivative of any direction is:
dϵ dρ = 1 E ( dσ dρ - u dσ j dρ ) = 1 E ( dσ dρ - u dσ j dz dz dρ ) = 1 E ( dσ dρ - utgβ dσ j dρ ) - - - ( 17 )
Vertically strain to the derivative of the degree of depth is:
dϵ j dz = 1 E ( dσ j dz - u dσ dz ) = 1 E ( dσ j dz - u dσ dρ dρ dz ) = 1 E ( dσ j dz - u tgβ dσ dρ ) - - - ( 19 )
Figure BSA00000492903900048
In the formula, β is the rock stratum angle of critical deformation.
Can calculate the stability factor of potential gliding mass on the arbitrary section according to (1)~(20) formula.
Derive as can be seen by above-mentioned theory, the degree of stability of slope rock mass is directly related with the relative tertiary location between the underground exploiting field, the stability factor that is to say side slope be sink, move horizontally, the function of horizontal distortion, inclination and curvature; And be positioned on the different spatial of overlying strata body on the underground exploiting field, above-mentioned distortion parameter size is consistent anything but; Meanwhile, these value of consult volume sizes also depend on the acting in conjunction of multiple factors such as coal winning method, roof control method, architectonic distribution situation, lithology power; This shows, if ignore or do not consider underground influence of adopting, obviously be imperfection or irrational.Other computing method of Slope Stability Evaluation equally also can add underground mining influence factor, and its derivation therewith roughly the same.
Description of drawings
Fig. 1 concerns synoptic diagram for the present invention is underground with the Subaerial comprehensive exploitation;
Fig. 2 is a stress schematic diagram of the present invention;
Embodiment
In underground mining influence territory, the cell cube both sides produce unbalanced move horizontally and cell cube produces unbalanced sedimentation up and down, make to produce horizontal strain and vertically strain in the cell cube; Wherein undergroundly adopt caused horizontal stress and be:
ϵ = 1 E ( σ - μσ j ) - - - ( 1 )
σ = E · ϵ = E · b d 2 W ( ρ ) dρ 2 - - - ( 2 )
In the formula, b is a displacement factor, and E is the rock mass elastic modulus, and W (ρ) is the sinking value in cell cube left side, and opposite side sinking value is W (ρ+Δ ρ).
The sedimentation of cell cube top and bottom is inconsistent and vertical stress that produce is:
ϵ j = 1 E ( σ j - μσ ) - - - ( 3 )
σ j = E · ϵ = E dW ( z ) dz - - - ( 4 )
In the formula, E is the rock mass elastic modulus, and W (z), W (z-Δ z) are the sinking value of cell cube top and bottom.
Generally under underground mining influence, the sinking value of arbitrfary point is on the different depth of ground:
w ( x , y ) = W max R z ∫ ∫ e - π ( x 2 + y 2 ) dxdy Z i - - - ( 5 )
In the formula, W MaxFor being Z in the degree of depth iMaximum sinking value on the plane, R zFor being Z in the degree of depth iMaximum effect radius on the plane, A are productive area.
The skid resistance of bar block:
Figure BSA00000492903900056
The sliding force of bar block:
T Ii = Σ j = 1 m Δz ij Δρ i · r sin α i + Δρ i 1 m Σ j = 1 m σ ij sin α i + Σ j = 1 m Δz ij σ i cos α i - - - ( 7 )
The skid resistance and the sliding force of potential gliding mass are respectively:
T I = Σ i = 1 n T i T i , = Σ i = 1 n T i , - - - ( 8 )
The stability factor of potential gliding mass is:
In the formula, r is a rock mass unit weight, α iBe the angle between cell cube base mid point normal and the gravity vertical, ε iBe the horizontal strain value of arbitrfary point in the cell cube, ε IjBe the vertical strain value of arbitrfary point in the cell cube, C,
Figure BSA00000492903900065
E is respectively rock mass cohesiveness, angle of internal friction and elastic modulus.
Because:
Figure BSA00000492903900066
Then (9) formula is:
(10) formula is the theoretical formula that slope stability is calculated under underground and the Subaerial comprehensive mining effect.Wherein
Figure BSA00000492903900069
With Can obtain according to following method.
Can derive following parameters by (5) formula:
(1) along the horizontal strain of any direction
Figure BSA000004929039000611
(2) the sinking distribution coefficient of on the strike principal section and tendency principal section:
c x = { [ erf ( π ‾ x R z ) + 1 ] - [ erf ( π ‾ ( x - L x ) / R z ) + 1 ] } / 2 - - - ( 12 )
c y = { [ erf ( π ‾ y R z ) + 1 ] - [ erf ( π ‾ ( y - L y ) / R z ) + 1 ] } / 2 - - - ( 13 )
(3) inclination and distortion
i x = w max R z [ e - π x 2 R z 2 - e - π ( x - L x ) 2 R z 2 ] , i y = w max R z [ e - π y 2 R z 2 - e - π ( y - L y ) 2 R z 2 ] - - - ( 14 )
(4) move horizontally
u x = bw max [ e - π x 2 R z 2 - e - π ( x - L x ) 2 R z 2 ] u y = bw max [ e - π y 2 R z 2 - e - π ( y - L y ) 2 R z 2 ]
(15)
(5) curvature distortion
k x = - 2 π w max R z [ x R z e - π x 2 R z 2 - x - L x R z e - π ( x - L x ) 2 R z 2 ] (16)
k y = - 2 π w max R z [ y R z e - π y 2 R z 2 - y - L y R z e - π ( y - L y ) 2 R z 2 ]
In the formula, L x, L yBe respectively the horizontal projection value of the exploitation length of on the strike and across strike, all the other symbols are identical with the front.
Horizontal strain along the derivative of any direction is:
dϵ dρ = 1 E ( dσ dρ - u dσ j dρ ) = 1 E ( dσ dρ - u dσ j dz dz dρ ) = 1 E ( dσ dρ - utgβ dσ j dρ ) - - - ( 17 )
Vertically strain to the derivative of the degree of depth is:
dϵ j dz = 1 E ( dσ j dz - u dσ dz ) = 1 E ( dσ j dz - u dσ dρ dρ dz ) = 1 E ( dσ j dz - u tgβ dσ dρ ) - - - ( 19 )
Figure BSA00000492903900081
In the formula, β is the rock stratum angle of critical deformation.
Can calculate the stability factor of potential gliding mass on the arbitrary section according to (1)~(20) formula.

Claims (2)

1. slope rock mass method for estimating stability, be not only applicable to side slope rock stability evaluation under the underground and open-air compound mining influence, equally also be applicable to the evaluation of underground mining to slope, mountain area, hills body, railway bed stability, it mainly may further comprise the steps:
Get a block abcd, and appoint therein and get a cell cube; Because in underground mining influence territory, the cell cube both sides produce unbalanced move horizontally and cell cube produces unbalanced sedimentation up and down, make to produce horizontal strain and vertically strain in the cell cube; Wherein undergroundly adopt caused horizontal stress and be:
ϵ = 1 E ( σ - μσ j ) - - - ( 1 )
σ = E · ϵ = E · b d 2 W ( ρ ) d ρ 2 - - - ( 2 )
In the formula, b is a displacement factor, and E is the rock mass elastic modulus, and W (ρ) is the sinking value in cell cube left side, and opposite side sinking value is W (ρ+Δ ρ).
The sedimentation of cell cube top and bottom is inconsistent and vertical stress that produce is:
ϵ j = 1 E ( σ j - μσ ) - - - ( 3 )
σ j = E · ϵ = E dW ( z ) dz - - - ( 4 )
In the formula, E is the rock mass elastic modulus, and W (z), W (z-Δ z) are the sinking value of cell cube top and bottom.
Generally under underground mining influence, the sinking value of arbitrfary point is on the different depth of ground:
w ( x , y ) = W max R z ∫ ∫ e - π ( x 2 + y 2 ) dxdy Z i - - - ( 5 )
In the formula, W MaxFor being Z in the degree of depth tMaximum sinking value on the plane, R zFor being Z in the degree of depth iMaximum effect radius on the plane, A are productive area.
The skid resistance of bar block:
Figure FSA00000492903800016
The sliding force of bar block:
T Ii = Σ j = 1 m Δz ij Δρ i · r sin α i + Δρ i 1 m Σ j = 1 m σ ij sin α i + Σ j = 1 m Δz ij σ i cos α i - - - ( 7 )
The skid resistance and the sliding force of potential gliding mass are respectively:
T I = Σ i = 1 n T i T i , = Σ i = 1 n T i , - - - ( 8 )
The stability factor of potential gliding mass is:
Figure FSA00000492903800024
In the formula, r is a rock mass unit weight, α iBe the angle between cell cube base mid point normal and the gravity vertical, ε iBe the horizontal strain value of arbitrfary point in the cell cube, ε IjBe the vertical strain value of arbitrfary point in the cell cube, C,
Figure FSA00000492903800025
E is respectively rock mass cohesiveness, angle of internal friction and elastic modulus.
Because:
Figure FSA00000492903800026
Figure FSA00000492903800027
Then (9) formula is:
Figure FSA00000492903800028
(10) formula is the theoretical formula that slope stability is calculated under underground and the Subaerial comprehensive mining effect.Wherein
Figure FSA00000492903800029
With
Figure FSA000004929038000210
Can obtain according to following method.
Can derive following parameters by (5) formula:
(1) along the horizontal strain of any direction
Figure FSA000004929038000211
(2) the sinking distribution coefficient of on the strike principal section and tendency principal section:
c x = { [ erf ( π ‾ x R z ) + 1 ] - [ erf ( π ‾ ( x - L x ) / R z ) + 1 ] } / 2 - - - ( 12 )
c y = { [ erf ( π ‾ y R z ) + 1 ] - [ erf ( π ‾ ( y - L y ) / R z ) + 1 ] } / 2 - - - ( 13 )
(3) inclination and distortion
i x = w max R z [ e - π x 2 R z 2 - e - π ( x - L x ) 2 R z 2 ] , i y = w max R z [ e - π y 2 R z 2 - e - π ( y - L y ) 2 R z 2 ] - - - ( 14 )
(4) move horizontally
u x = bw max [ e - π x 2 R z 2 - e - π ( x - L x ) 2 R z 2 ] u y = bw max [ e - π y 2 R z 2 - e - π ( y - L y ) 2 R z 2 ]
(5) curvature distortion
k x = - 2 π w max R z [ x R z e - π x 2 R z 2 - x - L x R z e - π ( x - L x ) 2 R z 2 ] (16)
k y = - 2 π w max R z [ y R z e - π y 2 R z 2 - y - L y R z e - π ( y - L y ) 2 R z 2 ]
In the formula, L x, L yBe respectively the horizontal projection value of the exploitation length of on the strike and across strike, all the other symbols are identical with the front.
Horizontal strain along the derivative of any direction is:
dϵ dρ = 1 E ( dσ dρ - u dσ j dρ ) = 1 E ( dσ dρ - u dσ j dz dz dρ ) = 1 E ( dσ dρ - utgβ dσ j dρ ) - - - ( 17 )
Figure FSA000004929038000310
Vertically strain to the derivative of the degree of depth is:
dϵ j dz = 1 E ( dσ j dz - u dσ dz ) = 1 E ( dσ j dz - u dσ dρ dρ dz ) = 1 E ( dσ j dz - u tgβ dσ dρ ) - - - ( 19 )
Figure FSA00000492903800041
In the formula, β is the rock stratum angle of critical deformation.
2. the method for claim 1 is primarily characterized in that the derivation to formula 10,19,20.
CN 201110120594 2011-05-11 2011-05-11 Slope rock mass stability evaluation method Pending CN102279421A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN 201110120594 CN102279421A (en) 2011-05-11 2011-05-11 Slope rock mass stability evaluation method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN 201110120594 CN102279421A (en) 2011-05-11 2011-05-11 Slope rock mass stability evaluation method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN102279421A true CN102279421A (en) 2011-12-14

Family

ID=45104971

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN 201110120594 Pending CN102279421A (en) 2011-05-11 2011-05-11 Slope rock mass stability evaluation method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN102279421A (en)

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103077270A (en) * 2012-12-31 2013-05-01 河海大学 Method for determining highest risk surface of side slope
CN103485353A (en) * 2013-09-24 2014-01-01 昆明理工大学 Slope stability analysis slice method based on global optimization
CN103713332A (en) * 2013-12-26 2014-04-09 广西华锡集团股份有限公司 Method for determining jointed rock mass roadway axis strike
CN103729521A (en) * 2014-01-20 2014-04-16 湖北工业大学 Slide face boundary method for calculating slope stability
CN103728664A (en) * 2013-12-24 2014-04-16 辽宁工程技术大学 Analysis method for stability of strip mine side slope in earthquake
CN104504461A (en) * 2014-12-09 2015-04-08 鞍钢集团矿业公司 Method for predicating mine pit slope deformation destroy induced by conversion from surface mining to underground mining
CN105332381A (en) * 2015-11-10 2016-02-17 长安大学 Method for analyzing stability of ribbed slope
CN106326528A (en) * 2016-08-09 2017-01-11 鞍钢集团矿业有限公司 Method for predicting distribution rule of ground surface fissures induced by underground mining of surface mine end slope
CN106503354A (en) * 2016-11-01 2017-03-15 中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所 A kind of unsaturation soil property stable slope computed improved method
CN108446450A (en) * 2018-02-23 2018-08-24 煤炭工业济南设计研究院有限公司 A kind of analysis calculation method of building destruction degree by mining influence
CN109033662A (en) * 2018-08-06 2018-12-18 重庆交通大学 Bedding rock sloper based on deformation excavates method for analyzing stability
CN110348125A (en) * 2019-07-12 2019-10-18 西安科技大学 A kind of visualization method of discrimination of block stability
CN110633542A (en) * 2019-06-18 2019-12-31 贵州正业工程技术投资有限公司 Group tension action spherical crown type slope stability evaluation method based on simple plane sliding method
CN110737945A (en) * 2019-10-25 2020-01-31 中冶长天国际工程有限责任公司 method and device for determining section parameters of three-arch roadway
CN110847141A (en) * 2019-11-26 2020-02-28 山西省交通规划勘察设计院有限公司 Slope gliding thrust calculation method based on deep displacement deformation monitoring
CN113642941A (en) * 2021-10-14 2021-11-12 西南交通大学 Slope safety state analysis method, device and equipment and readable storage medium

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000096571A (en) * 1998-09-18 2000-04-04 Hokuryo Jrc Kogyo Kk Slope face cover for shoulder
CN101538861A (en) * 2009-04-21 2009-09-23 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 Highway slope stability grading evaluation method

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000096571A (en) * 1998-09-18 2000-04-04 Hokuryo Jrc Kogyo Kk Slope face cover for shoulder
CN101538861A (en) * 2009-04-21 2009-09-23 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 Highway slope stability grading evaluation method

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
《工程地质学报》 19981231 孙世国等 地下与露天复合采动影响下边坡岩体稳定性评价方法的研究 312-318 1-2 第6卷, 第4期 *

Cited By (29)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103077270B (en) * 2012-12-31 2015-04-29 河海大学 Method for determining highest risk surface of side slope
CN103077270A (en) * 2012-12-31 2013-05-01 河海大学 Method for determining highest risk surface of side slope
CN103485353A (en) * 2013-09-24 2014-01-01 昆明理工大学 Slope stability analysis slice method based on global optimization
CN103485353B (en) * 2013-09-24 2015-08-12 昆明理工大学 Based on the Analysis of Slope Stability slice method of global optimization
CN103728664A (en) * 2013-12-24 2014-04-16 辽宁工程技术大学 Analysis method for stability of strip mine side slope in earthquake
CN103728664B (en) * 2013-12-24 2016-04-13 辽宁工程技术大学 The analytical approach of a kind of open-pit slope stability in earthquake
CN103713332A (en) * 2013-12-26 2014-04-09 广西华锡集团股份有限公司 Method for determining jointed rock mass roadway axis strike
CN103713332B (en) * 2013-12-26 2016-06-15 广西华锡集团股份有限公司 A kind of crack rock laneway axis moves towards defining method
CN103729521B (en) * 2014-01-20 2017-07-11 湖北工业大学 The slide face boundary that a kind of slope stability is calculated
CN103729521A (en) * 2014-01-20 2014-04-16 湖北工业大学 Slide face boundary method for calculating slope stability
CN104504461A (en) * 2014-12-09 2015-04-08 鞍钢集团矿业公司 Method for predicating mine pit slope deformation destroy induced by conversion from surface mining to underground mining
CN105332381B (en) * 2015-11-10 2018-03-20 长安大学 A kind of reinforced slope method for analyzing stability
CN105332381A (en) * 2015-11-10 2016-02-17 长安大学 Method for analyzing stability of ribbed slope
CN106326528A (en) * 2016-08-09 2017-01-11 鞍钢集团矿业有限公司 Method for predicting distribution rule of ground surface fissures induced by underground mining of surface mine end slope
CN106503354B (en) * 2016-11-01 2019-06-04 中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所 A kind of unsaturation soil property stable slope computed improved method
CN106503354A (en) * 2016-11-01 2017-03-15 中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所 A kind of unsaturation soil property stable slope computed improved method
CN108446450A (en) * 2018-02-23 2018-08-24 煤炭工业济南设计研究院有限公司 A kind of analysis calculation method of building destruction degree by mining influence
CN108446450B (en) * 2018-02-23 2021-07-02 通用技术集团工程设计有限公司 Method for analyzing and calculating damage degree of building influenced by mining
CN109033662B (en) * 2018-08-06 2022-05-10 重庆交通大学 Bedding slope excavation stability analysis method based on deformation
CN109033662A (en) * 2018-08-06 2018-12-18 重庆交通大学 Bedding rock sloper based on deformation excavates method for analyzing stability
CN110633542A (en) * 2019-06-18 2019-12-31 贵州正业工程技术投资有限公司 Group tension action spherical crown type slope stability evaluation method based on simple plane sliding method
CN110633542B (en) * 2019-06-18 2021-01-15 贵州正业工程技术投资有限公司 Method for evaluating stability of spherical crown type slope under action of group tension based on plane sliding method
CN110348125A (en) * 2019-07-12 2019-10-18 西安科技大学 A kind of visualization method of discrimination of block stability
CN110348125B (en) * 2019-07-12 2022-12-02 西安科技大学 Visual discrimination method for stability of block
CN110737945A (en) * 2019-10-25 2020-01-31 中冶长天国际工程有限责任公司 method and device for determining section parameters of three-arch roadway
CN110847141B (en) * 2019-11-26 2021-09-24 山西省交通规划勘察设计院有限公司 Slope gliding thrust calculation method based on deep displacement deformation monitoring
CN110847141A (en) * 2019-11-26 2020-02-28 山西省交通规划勘察设计院有限公司 Slope gliding thrust calculation method based on deep displacement deformation monitoring
CN113642941A (en) * 2021-10-14 2021-11-12 西南交通大学 Slope safety state analysis method, device and equipment and readable storage medium
CN113642941B (en) * 2021-10-14 2022-01-07 西南交通大学 Slope safety state analysis method, device and equipment and readable storage medium

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN102279421A (en) Slope rock mass stability evaluation method
Peng Topical areas of research needs in ground control–a state of the art review on coal mine ground control
Marcak et al. Seismic activation of tectonic stresses by mining
Wang et al. Numerical investigation of the dynamic mechanical state of a coal pillar during longwall mining panel extraction
Sui et al. Interactions of overburden failure zones due to multiple-seam mining using longwall caving
Gao et al. Evaluation of coal longwall caving characteristics using an innovative UDEC Trigon approach
Khalymendyk et al. The mechanism of roadway deformation in conditions of laminated rocks
Luo et al. Geomechanical modeling of stresses adjacent to salt bodies: Part 1—Uncoupled models
Tang Applications of rock failure process analysis (RFPA) method
Suchowerska et al. Horizontal stress under supercritical longwall panels
Yan et al. An innovative approach for gateroad layout in highly gassy longwall top coal caving
Konicek et al. Long-term Czech experiences with rockbursts with applicability to today’s underground coal mines
Das et al. Evaluation of the effect of fault on the stability of underground workings of coal mine through DEM and statistical analysis
Li et al. Impact of longwall mining on groundwater above the longwall panel in shallow coal seams
Yang et al. Experimental investigation into stress-relief characteristics with upward large height and upward mining under hard thick roof
Dehghan et al. 3-D modeling of rock burst in pillar No. 19 of Fetr6 chromite mine
Wu et al. Deformation characteristics and mechanism of deep subsize coal pillar of the tilted stratum
Han et al. Surface subsidence prediction method for coal mines with ultrathick and hard stratum
Pang et al. Double-factor control method for calculating hydraulic support working resistance for longwall mining with large mining height
Huang et al. Lagged settlement in sandy cobble strata and earth pressure on shield tunnel
Sun et al. Numerical investigation of gob-side entry retaining through precut overhanging hard roof to control rockburst
Klemetti et al. Longwall gateroad yield pillar response and model verification–a case study
Miller et al. Structural analysis of faults related to a heterogeneous stress history: reconstruction of a dismembered gold deposit, Stawell, western Lachlan Fold Belt, Australia
Guo et al. Using the Schwarz alternating method to identify critical water-resistant thickness between tunnel and concealed cavity
Van Dyke et al. Moderate cover bleeder entry and standing support performance in a longwall mine: a case study

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
C02 Deemed withdrawal of patent application after publication (patent law 2001)
WD01 Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication

Application publication date: 20111214